Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Gold diamond Nanocomposites Efficiently Generate Hydrated Electrons upon Absorption of Visible Light

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Detonation nanodiamonds decorated with gold nanoparticles absorb visible light and emit hydrated electrons into water, providing a biocompatible, visible-light-driven source of the strongest aqueous reducing agent.

desk verdict A credible proof-of-principle for visible-light hydrated electron generation from a gold-nanodiamond composite, but the reported efficiency is an upper bound until the 700-nm transient band is spectrally deconvolved. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07785 v1 pith:N2QJUOO6 submitted 2024-11-25 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Silvia Orlanducci , Giuseppe Ammirati , Alessandro Bellucci , Daniele Catone , Lionel C. Gontard , Faustino Martelli , Roberto Matassa , Alessandra Paladini
show 3 more authors
Francesco Toschi Stefano Turchini Patrick O'Keeffe
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hydratedelectronsdetonationnanodiamondgoldnanoparticlesplasmonicstransientabsorptionspectroscopyvisiblelightphotocatalysissp2carbonsolarenergyconversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors set out to prove that a composite of detonation nanodiamond and gold nanoparticles (AuNP@DND) can absorb visible light and emit electrons into water, forming hydrated electrons, the most powerful reducing agent available for photochemistry. They show that pumping a water suspension of these particles at 500 nm produces a transient absorption band centered near 720 nm, the fingerprint of the hydrated electron, with an injection efficiency of about 0.20% and with 40–50% of the signal removed by a nitrate electron scavenger. Neither bare nanodiamonds nor bare gold nanoparticles produce an observable signal under the same conditions, supporting a mechanism in which the gold plasmon enhances the absorption of visible light by sp2-hybridized carbon islands on the diamond surface, which then release single electrons into the surrounding water. If correct, this is the first demonstration of a biocompatible, non-toxic composite generating hydrated electrons directly from visible light, opening a route to solar-driven reduction of N2 and CO2 and to wastewater treatment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the AuNP@DND nanocomposite—detonation nanodiamonds (3–5 nm) decorated with quasi-spherical gold nanoparticles (average 33 ± 15 nm), synthesized by reducing a gold complex on the DND surface. The working mechanism is a two-stage enhancement: the gold localized surface plasmon resonance amplifies the local electric field at the diamond surface, which in turn boosts the weak visible absorption of sp2-hybridized carbon islands (fullerene-like reconstructions) on the DND; electrons excited from these defect states are then emitted into the aqueous environment, forming hydrated electrons that are detected through their characteristic transient absorption at about 720 nm. The paper also uses the KI/CTTS photoionization system as a calibration reference for identifying hydrated electron dynamics, and the nitrate scavenger as a chemical control for the assignment.

What would settle it

Perform the same 500 nm pump experiment on AuNP@DND in D2O instead of H2O and track the shape and peak of the transient band: the hydrated-electron absorption shifts measurably upon deuteration, so if the 700–750 nm band does not shift correspondingly and follow the known deuterated-electron kinetics, the assignment to hydrated electrons is wrong. A complementary check is to titrate a saturating electron scavenger such as N2O or high-concentration nitrate and confirm that the residual 720 nm signal tends to zero rather than persisting with the same spectral shape.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that AuNP@DND nanocomposites serve as an efficient visible-light-driven source of hydrated electrons in water. The key experimental evidence is a photoinduced absorption band at 700–750 nm, peaked around 725 nm, that appears within about 5 ps of a 500 nm pump pulse and is partially quenched (40–50%) by added nitrate ions, a known electron scavenger. From the band intensity the authors derive a hydrated electron density of roughly 3.1 × $10^{14}$ $cm^{-3}$ and a photon-to-electron injection efficiency of about 0.20%, with a linear, single-photon pump-power dependence. The effect requires both components: bare DNDs and bare AuNPs separately show no detectable hydrated electron signal under identical visible excitation, and the pump-wavelength dependence shows the efficiency rising on the high-energy side of the gold plasmon resonance. The authors interpret the process as plasmonic enhancement, in a SERS-like manner, of the sub-bandgap absorption of sp2 islands on the DND surface, followed by electron emission into water, possibly through an intermediate charge-transfer-to-solvent state.

Load-bearing premise

The measurement hinges on assuming that the 700–750 nm transient absorption at 5 ps delay is entirely due to fully hydrated electrons; the nitrate scavenger only removes 40–50% of that signal, so if partially hydrated states, plasmon-derived absorption, or other transients contribute the rest, the reported electron densities and the 0.20% efficiency would be too high.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Visible light, including the solar spectrum, could replace UV light for producing hydrated electrons from diamond-based materials, making solar homogeneous photocatalysis of N2 and CO2 reduction feasible in principle.
  • The composite provides a non-toxic, biocompatible source of solvated electrons that could be applied to wastewater treatment, including degradation of persistent pollutants such as PFOS, and to nanomedicine.
  • The linear, single-photon dependence of the injection means ordinary solar fluxes can drive the process, not just intense laser pulses.
  • Tuning the AuNP-to-DND ratio, the size and shape of the gold particles, and the DND surface termination (for example hydrogenation) should raise the 0.20% injection efficiency substantially.
  • The pump-wavelength dependence indicates that photons on the high-energy side of the plasmon resonance give the best yields, directing the design of optimized plasmonic-diamond photocatalysts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the enhancement is described as SERS-like local field amplification, the yield should vary strongly with AuNP size, shape, and interparticle spacing; testing this systematically could raise efficiency by orders of magnitude.
  • The efficiency measured at 5 ps is an upper bound for practical photocatalysis, since many electrons recombine geminately on picosecond timescales; measuring the microsecond-lived fraction, as was done for UV-excited DNDs, is needed to estimate the true photochemical quantum yield.
  • The residual 650–700 nm absorption that the authors attribute to incomplete hydration suggests a distribution of partially solvated electron states; if resolved in time, this could directly probe the injection energy and the surface state involved.
  • The proposed mechanism implies that both the plasmon resonance and the sp2-island donor states must overlap in energy; a two-color pump-probe experiment separating plasmon excitation from direct DND excitation could distinguish local-field enhancement from hot-electron injection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that aqueous dispersions of gold-nanoparticle-decorated detonation nanodiamonds (AuNP@DNDs) exhibit a transient absorption band centered near 725 nm after visible (475–600 nm) femtosecond excitation, which the authors attribute to hydrated electrons. Supporting experiments include a calibration with photoionized KI, a nitrate scavenger that quenches 40–50% of the 700–750 nm signal, control measurements on pure water, bare DNDs, and bare AuNPs, and a linear power dependence of the signal. From the transient absorbance at 5 ps the authors derive a hydrated-electron density and an injection efficiency of about 0.20% at 500 nm excitation, and they propose that the mechanism is plasmonic enhancement of sub-bandgap electron emission from sp2-related surface states on diamond.

Significance. If the assignment of the 700–750 nm transient signal is correct, the work provides a visible-light-driven, biocompatible source of hydrated electrons, which would be relevant to solar photocatalysis, wastewater treatment, and photoredox chemistry. The paper has several genuine strengths: the hydrated-electron molar absorptivity is taken from the external Buxton compilation, the KI calibration provides a positive control for the detection window, the nitrate scavenger experiment gives a chemically specific test, and the linear power dependence supports a one-photon injection process. The manuscript is also careful to include controls for water, bare DND, and bare AuNP. The main weakness is that the quantitative efficiency claim rests on an assumption—that the 5 ps, 700–750 nm signal is exclusively hydrated electrons—that is not fully established by the data presented, because the scavenger leaves a substantial unquenched component and the bare-AuNP control is not reported in the relevant probe window.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Figure 4, and Table 1] The central assumption that the 700–750 nm transient at 5 ps is solely due to hydrated electrons is not established. The nitrate scavenger quenches only 40–50% of the signal, and the residual unquenched component is not spectrally characterized. The paper itself acknowledges in Section 3.3 that signal in the 650–700 nm range may include contributions from incomplete hydration or from overlap of plasmon and solvated-electron signals, and it is not shown that such contributions are absent at 700–750 nm. Because Table 1 converts ΔA = 0.00098 OD directly into n = 3.1×10^14 cm^-3 and ξ = 0.20%, any non-electron contribution to this ΔA would directly bias the reported density and efficiency upward. The authors should provide a spectral decomposition of the quenched versus unquenched components, test higher nitrate concentrations to determine whether the residual can be fully scavenged, or otherwise characterize the non-scavengeable component before reporting a quantitative injection efficiency.
  2. [Section 3.3 and SI S1.6] The bare-AuNP control is insufficient to exclude a plasmonic transient absorption in the 700–750 nm probe window. The manuscript states that solvated electrons could not be observed from bare AuNPs at 550 nm, but it does not report whether bare AuNPs exhibit any transient absorption at 700–750 nm at the pump wavelengths used for the efficiency extraction (e.g., 475–550 nm). Since the assignment of the AuNP@DND signal depends on the absence of other transient contributions in that specific window, the authors should present the bare-AuNP transient absorption data in the 700–750 nm range under comparable excitation conditions.
  3. [Table 1 and Figure 5] The reported efficiencies and their wavelength dependence are given without uncertainties. The Au concentration is quoted as 80 ± 20 μg/ml, yet the ΔA values, derived densities, and injection efficiencies in Table 1 and Figure 5 have no error bars, and the number of replicate measurements is not stated. Without this information the reader cannot assess whether the wavelength dependence in Figure 5 is significant or whether the difference between the KI calibration and the AuNP@DND sample is meaningful. The authors should provide standard deviations or confidence intervals for ΔA, n, and ξ, and propagate the concentration uncertainty where relevant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and formatting artifacts, such as 'D ND', 'p rocess', 'process es', 'AuNP@DnD', and inconsistent hyphenation of 'nanodiamonds'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Equation and Section 3.3] The definition of Nph in the efficiency calculation is not explicit. It appears to be the number of incident pump photons per unit volume rather than the number of absorbed photons; if so, the quantity should be labeled an incident-photon injection efficiency, and the expression for Nph should be given explicitly.
  3. [Section 2.4] The statement that the Au concentration is 'estimated to be 80 ± 20 μg/ml from absorbance measurements' would benefit from an explicit calibration method or a reference to the supporting information, since this value is used to describe the sample and could be relevant to reproducibility.
  4. [Figure 5] The open symbols for the efficiency at 600 nm where 'no hydrated electron signal was observed' should be clarified, for example by indicating the detection limit as an upper bound rather than plotting a zero value, to avoid implying a measured efficiency of zero.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: central yield rests on an external literature cross-section and direct transient-absorption measurement.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central quantitative claim—that AuNP@DNDs produce hydrated electrons with an injection efficiency of about 0.20% at 500 nm—is obtained by converting a measured transient absorbance at 700–750 nm into a hydrated-electron density using the Lambert-Beer law and the literature molar absorption coefficient of the hydrated electron (Buxton 1988, ref. 2), which is an external, parameter-free benchmark independent of the present results. The assignment of the band to hydrated electrons is additionally supported by a nitrate scavenger experiment and by a KI control measurement that calibrates the detection channel. The wavelength-dependent efficiencies in Figure 5 are directly extracted from measured optical densities and pump fluences; they are reported measurements, not predictions fitted to the claimed conclusion. The paper does explicitly flag the load-bearing spectral assumption ('we can assume that the transient signal at these wavelengths and at this delay is only due to the induced absorbance of the hydrated electrons') and later acknowledges a possible residual contribution in the 650–700 nm range; this is a spectral-assignment assumption that creates a correctness or overestimation risk, not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs. The self-citations present (refs. 38–42) cover the AuNP@DND synthesis route, previous characterization, and the femtosecond setup; they are incidental to the physical measurement and are not used to justify the hydrated-electron assignment or the efficiency value. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no result is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to establish. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the paper should receive a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims rest on two main assumptions: the purity of the 700-750 nm transient signal and the applicability of the literature molar absorption coefficient. No new free parameters are introduced; the measured power-law exponent (n=1) is a characterization rather than a fitted parameter. The mechanism, gold plasmon enhancement of sp2-island absorption, is a hypothesis explicitly flagged as uncertain and is not needed for the basic claim of hydrated electron generation.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The transient absorption at 700-750 nm at a delay of 5 ps is solely due to hydrated electrons, with no significant contribution from other transient species.
    Stated in Section 3.3 just before Table 1; used to convert optical density to hydrated electron density via the Lambert-Beer law. If false, the reported efficiencies are overestimated.
  • domain assumption The molar absorption coefficient of hydrated electrons in the AuNP@DND suspension equals the literature value of 1.90e7 mol^-1 cm^2.
    Taken from Buxton (ref 2) and applied without correction for the composite environment; the paper provides no in-situ calibration.
  • domain assumption The DND surfaces contain sp2 islands that give weak visible absorption, as inferred from prior literature rather than directly probed here.
    Used in Section 3.3 to explain the sub-bandgap absorption and emission mechanism, following Buchner (ref 24) and Thalassinos (ref 44).
  • domain assumption The control measurements on bare DND and bare AuNP are representative of the components in the composite, and no solution-phase synergy other than the composite itself produces the signal.
    Controls in Section 3.3 and SI S1.6/S5 show no hydrated electron signal from water, bare DND at 530 nm, or bare AuNP; if these controls were not representative, the composite-specific claim would weaken, though the central detection of hydrated electrons could still hold.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gold diamond Nanocomposites Efficiently Generate Hydrated Electrons upon Absorption of Visible Light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N2QJUOO6

@misc{pith2026241207785,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gold diamond Nanocomposites Efficiently Generate Hydrated Electrons upon Absorption of Visible Light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N2QJUOO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07785}
}
read the original abstract

An efficient source of hydrated electrons generated by visible light has the potential to have a major impact on solar homogeneous catalysis. Diamond has potentially a high capability of emitting hydrated electrons, but only using ultraviolet light (lambda<225 nm). In this work, we demonstrate the efficient absorption of visible light by nanocomposites consisting of detonation nanodiamonds and gold nanoparticles (AuNP@DNDs), which subsequently emit electrons into the aqueous environment in which they are suspended. This has been done by exciting the AuNP@DND with visible laser light and monitoring the appearance and intensity of the transient absorption of hydrated electrons centered at around 720 nm. We suggest that this mechanism is made possible by the plasmonic enhancement of visible absorption by sp2-hybridized islands on the DND surface. Optimization of this process could lead to important breakthroughs in solar photocatalysis of energy-intensive reactions such as N2 and CO2 reduction as well as providing a non-toxic source of hydrated electrons for applications in wastewater management and nanomedicine.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07785 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Morphological study of self-assembled gold nanoparticles and nanodiamonds (AuNP@DND). a) SEM image illustrating the surface morphology. b) Histogram showing the frequency distribution of the AuNP size. The SEM image ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Hydrated Electron

    Herbert JM, Coons MP. The Hydrated Electron. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2017;68(1):447-472. doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-050816

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-050816 2017

  2. [2]

    Critical Review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH/⋅O − in Aqueous Solution

    Buxton GV, Greenstock CL, Helman WP, Ross AB. Critical Review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH/⋅O − in Aqueous Solution. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1988;17(2):513-886. doi:10.1063/1.555805

    work page doi:10.1063/1.555805 1988

  3. [3]

    Absorption Spectrum of the Hydrated Electron in Water and in Aqueous Solutions

    Hart EJ, Boag JW. Absorption Spectrum of the Hydrated Electron in Water and in Aqueous Solutions. J Am Chem Soc. 1962;84(21):4090-4095. doi:10.1021/ja00880a025

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00880a025 1962

  4. [4]

    Detection of Aqueous Solvated Electrons Produced by Photoemission from Solids Using Transient Absorption Measurements

    Bachman BF, Zhu D, Bandy J, Zhang L, Hamers RJ. Detection of Aqueous Solvated Electrons Produced by Photoemission from Solids Using Transient Absorption Measurements. ACS Meas Sci Au. 2022;2(1):46-56. doi:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00025

    work page doi:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.1c00025 2022

  5. [5]

    Plasmon-Generated Solvated Electrons for Chemical Transformations

    Solti D, Chapkin KD, Renard D, et al. Plasmon-Generated Solvated Electrons for Chemical Transformations. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(44):20183-20189. doi:10.1021/jacs.2c07768

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.2c07768 2022

  6. [6]

    Removing Estrogenic Steroids from Waters: The Role of Reducing Hydrated Electron Reactions

    Rickman KA, Mezyk SP. Removing Estrogenic Steroids from Waters: The Role of Reducing Hydrated Electron Reactions. J Adv Oxid Technol. 2011;14(1). doi:10.1515/jaots-2011- 0110

    work page doi:10.1515/jaots-2011- 2011

  7. [7]

    Reactivities of hydrated electrons with organic compounds in aqueous-phase advanced reduction processes

    Daily R, Minakata D. Reactivities of hydrated electrons with organic compounds in aqueous-phase advanced reduction processes. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2022;8(3):543-574. doi:10.1039/D1EW00897H 20

    work page doi:10.1039/d1ew00897h 2022

  8. [8]

    Mechanism of N 2 Reduction to NH 3 by Aqueous Solvated Electrons

    Christianson JR, Zhu D, Hamers RJ, Schmidt JR. Mechanism of N 2 Reduction to NH 3 by Aqueous Solvated Electrons. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118(1):195-203. doi:10.1021/jp406535p

    work page doi:10.1021/jp406535p 2014

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    A new nitrogen fixation strategy: the direct formation of *N 2 − excited state on metal-free photocatalyst

    Niu X, Sun D, Shi L, et al. A new nitrogen fixation strategy: the direct formation of *N 2 − excited state on metal-free photocatalyst. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(10):6214-6222. doi:10.1039/D1TA00298H

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Hydroxyl radical production induced by plasma hydrogenated nanodiamonds under X-ray irradiation

    Kurzyp M, Girard HA, Cheref Y, et al. Hydroxyl radical production induced by plasma hydrogenated nanodiamonds under X-ray irradiation. Chem Commun. 2017;53(7):1237-

    2017

  3. [11]

    Recent advances in understanding the role of solvated electrons at the plasma-liquid interface of solution-based gas discharges

    Elg DT, Delgado HE, Martin DC, et al. Recent advances in understanding the role of solvated electrons at the plasma-liquid interface of solution-based gas discharges. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc. 2021;186:106307. doi:10.1016/j.sab.2021.106307

    2021

  4. [12]

    Multiphoton Ionization of Liquid Water with 3.0−5.0 eV Photons

    Crowell RA, Bartels DM. Multiphoton Ionization of Liquid Water with 3.0−5.0 eV Photons. J Phys Chem. 1996;100(45):17940-17949. doi:10.1021/jp9610978

    1996 doi

  5. [13]

    The ejection distribution of solvated electrons generated by the one-photon photodetachment of aqueous I− and two-photon ionization of the solvent

    Kloepfer JA, Vilchiz VH, Lenchenkov VA, Germaine AC, Bradforth SE. The ejection distribution of solvated electrons generated by the one-photon photodetachment of aqueous I− and two-photon ionization of the solvent. J Chem Phys. 2000;113(15):6288-

    2000

  6. [14]

    Nanosecond Transient Absorption of Hydrated Electrons and Reduction of Linear Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Sulfonates

    Maza WA, Breslin VM, Owrutsky JC, Pate BB, Epshteyn A. Nanosecond Transient Absorption of Hydrated Electrons and Reduction of Linear Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Sulfonates. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2021;8(7):525-530. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00383

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    Reduction of dinitrotoluene by hydrated electrons generated from UV irradiation of toluene in wastewater: Towards cleaner production

    Akbari A, Sadani M, Sedighizadeh A, et al. Reduction of dinitrotoluene by hydrated electrons generated from UV irradiation of toluene in wastewater: Towards cleaner production. J Clean Prod. 2019;238:117857. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117857

    2019

  8. [16]

    Unexpected Hydrated Electron Source for Preparative Visible-Light Driven Photoredox Catalysis

    Kerzig C, Guo X, Wenger OS. Unexpected Hydrated Electron Source for Preparative Visible-Light Driven Photoredox Catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(5):2122-2127. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b12223

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Can Hydrated Electrons be Produced from Water with Visible Light? ChemPhotoChem

    Pios S, Huang X, Domcke W. Can Hydrated Electrons be Produced from Water with Visible Light? ChemPhotoChem. 2021;5(7):680-690. doi:10.1002/cptc.202000305

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Mechanism for plasmon-generated solvated electrons

    Al-Zubeidi A, Ostovar B, Carlin CC, et al. Mechanism for plasmon-generated solvated electrons. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(3):e2217035120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2217035120

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Solvated dielectrons from optical excitation: An effective source of low-energy electrons

    Hartweg S, Barnes J, Yoder BL, et al. Solvated dielectrons from optical excitation: An effective source of low-energy electrons. Science. Published online May 25, 2023:eadh0184. doi:10.1126/science.adh0184

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Diamond surface functionalization: from gemstone to photoelectrochemical applications

    Raymakers J, Haenen K, Maes W. Diamond surface functionalization: from gemstone to photoelectrochemical applications. J Mater Chem C. 2019;7(33):10134-10165. doi:10.1039/C9TC03381E 21

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Hydrogen plasma treated nanodiamonds lead to an overproduction of hydroxyl radicals and solvated electrons in solution under ionizing radiation

    Brun E, Girard HA, Arnault JC, Mermoux M, Sicard-Roselli C. Hydrogen plasma treated nanodiamonds lead to an overproduction of hydroxyl radicals and solvated electrons in solution under ionizing radiation. Carbon. 2020;162:510-518. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.063

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Photo-illuminated diamond as a solid-state source of solvated electrons in water for nitrogen reduction

    Zhu D, Zhang L, Ruther RE, Hamers RJ. Photo-illuminated diamond as a solid-state source of solvated electrons in water for nitrogen reduction. Nat Mater. 2013;12(9):836-

    2013

  15. [23]

    Quantum photoyield of diamond(111)—A stable negative-affinity emitter

    Himpsel FJ, Knapp JA, VanVechten JA, Eastman DE. Quantum photoyield of diamond(111)—A stable negative-affinity emitter. Phys Rev B. 1979;20(2):624-627. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.20.624

    1979 doi

  16. [24]

    Early dynamics of the emission of solvated electrons from nanodiamonds in water

    Buchner F, Kirschbaum T, Venerosy A, et al. Early dynamics of the emission of solvated electrons from nanodiamonds in water. Nanoscale. 2022;14(46):17188-17195. doi:10.1039/D2NR03919B

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO by diamond nanoparticles

    Zhang L, Hamers RJ. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO by diamond nanoparticles. Diam Relat Mater. 2017;78:24-30. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2017.07.005

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Selective Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Aqueous CO 2 to CO by Solvated Electrons

    Zhang L, Zhu D, Nathanson GM, Hamers RJ. Selective Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Aqueous CO 2 to CO by Solvated Electrons. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(37):9746-9750. doi:10.1002/anie.201404328

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Degradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) by sub-bandgap irradiation of hydrogen-terminated nanodiamond

    Maza WA, Breslin VM, Feygelson TI, et al. Degradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) by sub-bandgap irradiation of hydrogen-terminated nanodiamond. Appl Catal B Environ. 2023;325:122306. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122306

    2023

  20. [28]

    On the history of the discovery of nanodiamond synthesis

    Danilenko VV. On the history of the discovery of nanodiamond synthesis. Phys Solid State. 2004;46(4):595-599. doi:10.1134/1.1711431

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    High yield fabrication of fluorescent nanodiamonds

    Boudou JP, Curmi PA, Jelezko F, et al. High yield fabrication of fluorescent nanodiamonds. Nanotechnology. 2009;20(23):235602. doi:10.1088/0957- 4484/20/23/235602

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    Nanodiamond synthesis by pulsed laser ablation in liquids

    Amans D, Chenus AC, Ledoux G, et al. Nanodiamond synthesis by pulsed laser ablation in liquids. Diam Relat Mater. 2009;18(2-3):177-180. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2008.10.035

    2009 doi

  23. [31]

    Colloids of detonation nanodiamond particles for advanced applications

    Shvidchenko AV, Eidelman ED, Vul’ AYa, et al. Colloids of detonation nanodiamond particles for advanced applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;268:64-81. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2019.03.008

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Nanodiamonds for nanomedicine

    Xing Y, Dai L. Nanodiamonds for nanomedicine. Nanomed. 2009;4(2):207-218. doi:10.2217/17435889.4.2.207

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Diamond Thin Films Using Embedded Ag Nanoparticles

    Li S, Bandy JA, Hamers RJ. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Diamond Thin Films Using Embedded Ag Nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(6):5395-5403. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b13821 22

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    Photocatalytic reduction of nitrogen to ammonia on diamond thin films grown on metallic substrates

    Bandy JA, Zhu D, Hamers RJ. Photocatalytic reduction of nitrogen to ammonia on diamond thin films grown on metallic substrates. Diam Relat Mater. 2016;64:34-41. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2016.01.006

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Photoemission from diamond films and substrates into water: dynamics of solvated electrons and implications for diamond photoelectrochemistry

    Hamers RJ, Bandy JA, Zhu D, Zhang L. Photoemission from diamond films and substrates into water: dynamics of solvated electrons and implications for diamond photoelectrochemistry. Faraday Discuss. 2014;172:397-411. doi:10.1039/C4FD00039K

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Femtosecond Laser-Induced Electron Emission from Nanodiamond-Coated Tungsten Needle Tips

    Tafel A, Meier S, Ristein J, Hommelhoff P. Femtosecond Laser-Induced Electron Emission from Nanodiamond-Coated Tungsten Needle Tips. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;123(14):146802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.146802

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Nanodiamonds for field emission: state of the art

    Terranova ML, Orlanducci S, Rossi M, Tamburri E. Nanodiamonds for field emission: state of the art. Nanoscale. 2015;7(12):5094-5114. doi:10.1039/C4NR07171A

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Gold nanoparticles on nanodiamond for nanophotonic applications

    Orlanducci S, Cianchetta I, Tamburri E, et al. Gold nanoparticles on nanodiamond for nanophotonic applications. MRS Proc. 2012;1452:mrss12-1452-ff04-08. doi:10.1557/opl.2012.1175

    2012

  31. [39]

    Structural and morphological peculiarities of hybrid Au/nanodiamond engineered nanostructures

    Matassa R, Orlanducci S, Reina G, et al. Structural and morphological peculiarities of hybrid Au/nanodiamond engineered nanostructures. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):31163. doi:10.1038/srep31163

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Nanodiamonds and gold nanoparticles: a promising couple for CRM‐free photonics

    Reina G, Orlanducci S, Tamburri E, Matassa R, Rossi M, Terranova ML. Nanodiamonds and gold nanoparticles: a promising couple for CRM‐free photonics. Phys Status Solidi C. 2016;13(10-12):972-978. doi:10.1002/pssc.201600111

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Highly efficient plasmon-mediated electron injection into cerium oxide from embedded silver nanoparticles

    Pelli Cresi JS, Spadaro MC, D’Addato S, et al. Highly efficient plasmon-mediated electron injection into cerium oxide from embedded silver nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2019;11(21):10282-10291. doi:10.1039/C9NR01390C

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of semiconducting and plasmonic nanostructures and their hybrids

    Catone D, Di Mario L, Martelli F, et al. Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of semiconducting and plasmonic nanostructures and their hybrids. Nanotechnology. 2020;32(2):025703. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/abb907

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    The birth and evolution of solvated electrons in the water

    Novelli F, Chen K, Buchmann A, et al. The birth and evolution of solvated electrons in the water. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(8):e2216480120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2216480120

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Fluorescence and Physico-Chemical Properties of Hydrogenated Detonation Nanodiamonds

    Thalassinos G, Stacey A, Dontschuk N, et al. Fluorescence and Physico-Chemical Properties of Hydrogenated Detonation Nanodiamonds. C — J Carbon Res. 2020;6(1):7. doi:10.3390/c6010007

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Low-threshold electron emission from diamond

    Cui JB, Ristein J, Ley L. Low-threshold electron emission from diamond. Phys Rev B. 1999;60(23):16135-16142. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16135

    1999 doi

  38. [46]

    Persistent misconceptions regarding SERS

    Moskovits M. Persistent misconceptions regarding SERS. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15(15):5301. doi:10.1039/c2cp44030j 23

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    Direct Determination of Plasmon Enhancement Factor and Penetration Depths in Surface Enhanced IR Absorption Spectroscopy

    Tseng C, Pennathur AK, Blauth D, Salazar N, Dawlaty JM. Direct Determination of Plasmon Enhancement Factor and Penetration Depths in Surface Enhanced IR Absorption Spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2023;39(9):3179-3184. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02254

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Plasmonic hot carriers scratch the surface

    Kumar S, Habib A, Sundararaman R. Plasmonic hot carriers scratch the surface. Trends Chem. 2021;3(11):902-910. doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2021.08.006

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    Plasmon-induced resonant effects on the optical properties of Ag-decorated ZnSe nanowires

    Sivan AK, Di Mario L, Catone D, et al. Plasmon-induced resonant effects on the optical properties of Ag-decorated ZnSe nanowires. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(17):174001. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab68ba

    2020 doi

  42. [841]

    doi:10.1038/nmat3696

    doi

  43. [1240]

    doi:10.1039/C6CC08895C

    doi

  44. [6307]

    doi:10.1063/1.1309011

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.