Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Evidence that pre-processing in filaments drives the anisotropic quenching of satellite galaxies in massive clusters

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Across 11 massive CLASH clusters at $z\approx0.36$, satellite galaxies aligned with the brightest cluster galaxy's major axis are significantly more likely to be quenched than those along the minor axis, a signal that extends to at least…

desk verdict Solid confirmation of anisotropic quenching in CLASH clusters, but the new claims about the radial peak and the signal out to 2.5R200 rest on a photo-z membership cut that could be contaminated by anisotropic interlopers. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07834 v2 pith:6DY5BPE6 submitted 2024-12-10 astro-ph.GA

Harry Stephenson (Lancaster) , John Stott , Joseph Butler , Molly Webster , Jonathan Head This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords anisotropicquenchinggalaxyclusterssatellitegalaxiespre-processinglarge-scalestructurebrightestclusterpassivefractionCLASH
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyses 11 massive galaxy clusters from the CLASH survey at $z\approx 0.2$\textendash$0.5$ to test whether satellite galaxies along the brightest cluster galaxy's (BCG's) major axis are quenched more often than those along the minor axis. A clear anisotropic signal appears in both galaxy colour $(B-R)$ and passive fraction, with peaks along the major axis and a fitted period consistent with $180^\circ$. The signal remains significant out to at least $2.5R_{200}$ (the radius enclosing 200 times the cosmic critical density) and its amplitude peaks near $1.25R_{200}$, the first direct measurement of a radial peak. Because the passive fraction is higher along the major axis even at fixed local surface density, the authors conclude that pre-processing of galaxies as they fall in along cosmic filaments, rather than AGN-driven outflows from the BCG, drives anisotropic quenching in massive clusters.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a simple angular decomposition: median colour and passive fraction are binned in angle from the BCG major axis and fitted with $y = A\cos(f x) + c$, where the amplitude $A$ quantifies the anisotropic quenching strength. Radial structure is mapped by repeating the fit in $0.5R_{200}$-wide circular annuli out to $3R_{200}$, which reveals the peak at $1$\textendash$1.5R_{200}$. To separate density from mechanism, the local surface density of each satellite is computed from the 4th- and 5th-nearest-neighbour distances, and colours and passive fractions are compared along the two axes at fixed density.

What would settle it

A spectroscopic redshift survey of satellites at $1$\textendash$2.5R_{200}$ in the same CLASH clusters would settle the question: if the colour excess along the major axis disappears once only confirmed members are used, the extended signal is a membership artifact rather than true anisotropic quenching.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that anisotropic quenching in massive clusters is a large-scale structure phenomenon, not an AGN feedback effect. The paper reports the first anisotropic quenching measurement out to $3R_{200}$, significant to at least $2.5R_{200}$, with an amplitude peak at approximately $1.25R_{200}$ that the authors attribute to a build-up of backsplash galaxies at that radius. At fixed local surface density, the passive fraction is higher along the major axis, ruling out a simple density artifact and showing that satellites along the major axis have spent more time in dense, pre-processing environments. The paper reconciles earlier discrepant results by arguing that the same filament-fed pre-processing explains the anisotropic signal seen in both low- and high-mass systems.

Load-bearing premise

Cluster membership at radii beyond $R_{200}$ rests entirely on the photometric-redshift cut $\Delta z = 0.03(1+z)^{3.26}$, with no background subtraction; if the photo-$z$ scatter is underestimated or the cut admits an angle-dependent foreground/background population, the extended anisotropic signal could be artificially enhanced or mimicked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Anisotropic quenching is not confined to the cluster core; it persists to at least $2.5R_{200}$, so any model of satellite quenching must act before galaxies cross the virial boundary.
  • The radial peak at $\approx1.25R_{200}$ implicates backsplash galaxies, which pile up at this radius after orbiting through the cluster, as an important contributor to the signal.
  • The fixed-density passive fraction offset shows the effect cannot be explained away as a trivial density difference along the two axes.
  • AGN-fuelled X-ray cavities, which typically extend at most $\sim0.2R_{200}$, cannot be the primary cause of the signal in massive clusters; pre-processing in filaments is the preferred explanation.
  • The similar signal strength in the two magnitude-limited samples argues against ram-pressure stripping as the dominant driver, since low-mass satellites would be affected more strongly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If filament pre-processing is the cause, the anisotropic signal should correlate with the actual filament orientation, not just the BCG major axis; stacking the CLASH clusters with external filament tracers would test this.
  • The backsplash interpretation predicts a stronger $1.25R_{200}$ peak in relaxed clusters, where more satellites have completed an orbit; splitting the sample by relaxation state would test it.
  • A similar analysis in galaxy groups ($M_h \sim 10^{13} M_\odot$) should show a weaker anisotropic signal, since coherent filamentary infall is less established in lower-mass halos.
  • Measuring green-valley (post-starburst) fractions along both axes could reveal whether the quenching timescale is genuinely shorter along the major axis, as the fixed-density offset implies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper analyses satellite galaxy colour (B−R) and passive galaxy fraction as functions of the angle from the BCG major axis in 11 CLASH clusters at z ≈ 0.2–0.5, using Subaru/Suprime-Cam data. The authors report a significant sinusoidal anisotropic quenching signal within 1.5R200, with colour amplitude 0.14±0.01 and f_pass amplitude 0.063±0.006, both with periods consistent with 180°. They extend the analysis to 3R200, claim the signal remains significant out to at least 2.5R200, and report a radial peak of the amplitude at ≈1.25R200. They also show that f_pass is higher along the major axis for fixed local surface density at low densities, and conclude that pre-processing in large-scale structure, not AGN outflows, drives anisotropic quenching in massive clusters.

Significance. If the extended-radius claims hold, this would be an important result: it would be the first direct measurement of a radial peak in anisotropic quenching amplitude and the first detection of the signal at 2.5–3R200, with implications for the relative roles of pre-processing versus AGN feedback. The paper is clearly written and uses publicly available data, and the central inner signal (within 1.5R200) appears robust, with a fitted period consistent with 180° and f_pass amplitude in excess of 5σ. The main value of the paper is therefore in the extended radial and density analyses, but these rest on a photometric membership selection whose contamination is not quantified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2] The cluster membership selection is a single colour-independent photometric redshift cut, Δz = 0.03(1+z_cluster)^3.26, with no background or foreground subtraction. At the median cluster redshift z ≈ 0.36 this window is Δz ≈ 0.08, corresponding to a line-of-sight depth of roughly 300 Mpc, i.e., several hundred R200. Because BCG major axes are aligned with the surrounding cosmic web (as cited in Section 4.2, e.g., Smith et al. 2023), the same filaments that feed the cluster can contribute an angle-dependent interloper population whose galaxies are already pre-processed and hence redder or more passive. This can produce or boost precisely the anisotropic signal reported at 1.25–2.5R200. The inner signal below R200 is less exposed to this effect and is consistent with previous work, but the abstract claims of a radial peak at ≈1.25R200 and significance out to 2.5R200 are not established until this selection effect is quantified, e.g., by comparing with an equal-area background sample or by reweighting by photo-z probability.
  2. [Section 3.1, Figures 3 and 6] The claim that the anisotropic quenching amplitude has a radial peak at ≈1.25R200 is supported only by a ~2σ drop to the adjacent annulus in the −16.8 mag sample, while in the −18.6 mag sample the peak amplitude is consistent with the surrounding annuli (amplitude 0.16±0.03 at 1–1.5R200 versus 0.15±0.04 at 1.5–2R200). Moreover, no formal significance test is reported for the individual annulus amplitudes, so the statement that the signal 'remains significant out to at least 2.5R200' is not quantified. The abstract's claim that this is the first direct measurement of a radial peak is therefore overstated; the data are consistent with a plateau as well as with a peak.
  3. [Sections 3.1 and 3.2] The passive-fraction measurement is not an independent probe of the colour measurement: the sample is split at (B−R)_corr = 1.45, a cut chosen from the same colour distribution that defines the colour signal, and the f_pass angular signal is a non-linear transformation of the same colours. Consequently, the >5σ amplitude quoted for f_pass in Section 3.2 should not be presented as an independent confirmation of the colour signal. This does not weaken the inner detection, but the two analyses should be described as correlated tests rather than independent ones.
  4. [Section 4.2] The conclusion that pre-processing in large-scale structure, rather than AGN outflows, drives anisotropic quenching rests on the density profiles shown in Figures 9 and 10, which are computed from the same photometric member sample. Given the broad photo-z window and the absence of background subtraction (see first major comment), the density contrast between major and minor axes at fixed cluster-centric radius could be inflated by anisotropic interlopers. A direct test with spectroscopically confirmed members in the outer annuli, or with a field-subtracted density estimate, is needed before the causal conclusion can be accepted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Figures 7–8 captions] The text states that galaxies are defined as being along an axis if within ±15° of that axis, but the captions of Figures 7 and 8 say ±30°; please reconcile the opening angle used.
  2. [Section 2] The text refers to spectroscopic redshifts for cluster members in 'MACS2129', but Table 1 lists the cluster as RXJ2129; this appears to be a typo that should be corrected.
  3. [Equation 2] The surface density formula is written as log10(4/π d^2_n), which is ambiguous; it should be log10(4/(π d_n^2)) (and similarly for the 5th-nearest-neighbour term).
  4. [Section 2] The statement that MACS1311 'only had R_C data available from Subaru' conflicts with Table 1, which lists B842, V843, and z'_IMACS from other instruments; please clarify that only the R_C band is from Subaru.
  5. [Section 2, k-correction] The k-and-evolution correction uses an SSP model for quiescent galaxies, which may be less appropriate for star-forming galaxies; a brief sensitivity test using a different template set would help assess this systematic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The derivation chain is self-contained observationally; the only concerns are a non-independent f_pass statistic, a minor non-load-bearing self-citation, and a photo-z membership systematic, none of which make a central result reduce to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

No load-bearing circularity is present. The central anisotropic quenching amplitudes are measured from CLASH/Subaru photometry and fitted with a cosine model (Equation 1); no parameter fitted in one part of the analysis is renamed as a prediction in another. The f_pass measurement is a dichotomized version of the same (B−R)_corr. colour used for the colour signal, so it is not an independent confirmation of the colour result, but it is a companion statistic rather than a derivation that reduces to its inputs. The self-citation to Stott (2022) is used for the prior CLASH analysis and k-correction details, and it is not load-bearing; independent literature is cited for the alignment and pre-processing interpretation (e.g., Smith et al. 2023; Kuchner et al. 2021; Karp et al. 2023; Zakharova et al. 2025). The extended 2.5–3R200 claim rests on the Section 2 photometric-redshift membership cut Δz = 0.03(1+z)^3.26 with no background subtraction; this is a selection systematic that could affect the correctness of the extended signal, but it is not a circularity. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation and the non-independence of f_pass, not a derivation that is equivalent to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central detection is an empirical measurement; the main data-driven choices are the passive colour cut and the photo-z membership window. Both are listed as free parameters because they are fit to or selected from the data and the claims depend on them. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Colour cut for passive/SF split = (B-R)_corr = 1.45
    Chosen as the midpoint between the two peaks of the colour distribution of all CLASH galaxies in the redshift range, not calibrated against spectra or SED fits. The passive fraction signal depends on this threshold.
  • Photo-z membership relation coefficients = slope 3.26 +/- 1.05, intercept -1.56 +/- 0.19 in log10(2 sigma_phz) vs log10(1+z)
    Fit to spectroscopic redshifts in a subset of CLASH clusters. The resulting Delta z = 0.03(1+z)^3.26 window defines cluster membership and is the only membership filter at large radii.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard LambdaCDM cosmology (Omega_L = 0.7, Omega_m = 0.3, H0 = 70 km/s/Mpc) and Chabrier IMF.
    Stated in Section 1; used for distances, R200, masses, and k-corrections.
  • domain assumption BPZ photometric redshifts from Umetsu et al. (2014) are accurate enough for membership selection.
    Invoked in Section 2; the membership cut is calibrated against spec-z for some clusters but not all.
  • domain assumption The BCG major-axis position angle from Molino et al. (2017), combined with visual BCG identification, defines the anisotropic reference frame.
    All angular measurements are relative to this position angle, and no PA uncertainty is propagated.
  • domain assumption The (B-R) colour after k-corrections is a reliable star-forming/passive indicator for z ~ 0.2-0.5 galaxies.
    Used to define both the colour signal and f_pass; the split at 1.45 is derived from the same colour distribution.
  • domain assumption X-ray cavity sizes from the literature (typically 15-300 kpc) are representative for CLASH clusters.
    Used in Section 4.1 to rule out AGN as the cause of the signal beyond about 0.2R200.
  • domain assumption The 4th and 5th nearest-neighbour surface density traces the local environment relevant for quenching.
    Used in Section 3.3 to test density dependence; the choice of n = 4,5 follows common practice in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence that pre-processing in filaments drives the anisotropic quenching of satellite galaxies in massive clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6DY5BPE6

@misc{pith2026241207834,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence that pre-processing in filaments drives the anisotropic quenching of satellite galaxies in massive clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6DY5BPE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07834}
}
abstract

We use a sample of 11 $z\approx0.2-0.5$ ($z_{\text{med.}} = 0.36$) galaxy clusters from the Cluster Lensing And Supernovae survey with Hubble (CLASH) to analyse the angular dependence of satellite galaxy colour $(B-R)$ and passive galaxy fraction ($f_{\text{pass.}}$) with respect to the major axis of the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). This phenomenon has been dubbed as \say{anisotropic quenching}, \say{angular conformity} or \say{angular segregation}, and it describes how satellite galaxies along the major axis of the BCG are more likely to be quenched than those along the minor axis. A highly significant anisotropic quenching signal is found for satellites, with a peak in $(B-R)$ and $f_{\text{pass.}}$ along the major axis. We are the first to measure anisotropic quenching out to cluster-centric radii of $3R_{200}$ ($R_{200\text{, med.}} \approx 933$ \si{\kilo\parsec}). We find that the signal is significant out to at least $2.5R_{200}$, and the amplitude of the signal peaks at $\approx1.25R_{200}$. This is the first time a radial peak of the anisotropic quenching signal has been measured directly. We suggest that this peak could be caused by a build-up of backsplash galaxies at this radius. Finally, we find that $f_{\text{pass.}}$ is significantly higher along the major axis for fixed values of local surface density. The density drops less rapidly along the major axis and so satellites spend more time being pre-processed here compared to the minor axis. We therefore conclude that pre-processing in large-scale structure, and not active galactic nuclei outflows (AGN), is the cause of the anisotropic quenching signal in massive galaxy clusters, however this may not be the cause in lower mass halos.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07834 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anisotropic quenching signal in colour-angle space for satellite galaxies within 1.5𝑅200. The left panels show the sinusoidal signal overlayed on the whole population of individual satellites (black points) in this plane, and the right panels just show the binned medians and the sinusoid fits. The red points and fit in Figure 1b are the anisotropic signal using an absolute 𝑅-band completeness limit of −16.8 mag, and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The amplitude of the anisotropic quenching signal at different cluster-centric radii. The points represent the amplitude of the fit for all satel￾lites within the corresponding 𝑅/𝑅200 radius. The errors are the uncertainty on the amplitude of the anisotropic quenching signal. The top panel (red points) indicate the radially evolving amplitude for satellites using our −16.8 absolute 𝑅-band magnitude completeness limi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The amplitude of the anisotropic quenching signal in colour-angle space within 0.5𝑅200-wide circular annuli as a function of cluster-centric radius. The points represent the amplitude of the fit within each annulus, and the corresponding 𝑅/𝑅200 value is the central value of the annulus. The error bars are the uncertainty on the amplitude of the anisotropic quenching signal. The dashed step function represents the ra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Anisotropic quenching signal in 𝑓pass.-angle space for satellite galaxies within 1.5𝑅200 using a −16.8 mag completeness limit in 𝑅-band. The red points and fit in the left panel are the anisotropic signal using an absolute 𝑅-band completeness limit of −16.8 mag, and th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The amplitude of the anisotropic quenching signal in 𝑓pass.-angle space within 0.5𝑅200-wide circular annuli as a function of cluster-centric radius. The points represent the amplitude of the fit within each annulus, and the corresponding 𝑅/𝑅200 value is the central val…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The distribution of (𝐵 − 𝑅)corr. against local surface density of satellite galaxies that are ±30° from either the minor or major axis. In the left panel, the solid red circles and solid blue squares represent the median (𝐵 − 𝑅)corr. in surface density bins for galaxie…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The top panel shows the distribution of median 𝑓pass. values in local surface density bins of satellite galaxies that are ±30° from either the minor or major axis. The red points (blue squares) indicate the 𝑓pass. values along the major (minor) axis. The error on 𝑓pass…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The relationship between local surface density and distance from the cluster centre in units of log10 (𝑅/𝑅200 ). The red points (blue squares) indicate the median surface density values along the major (minor) axis in cluster-centric distance bins. The error bars repr…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MIGHTEE-HI: Environmental effects of cosmic filaments on extragalactic HI detections in the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Filaments in the cosmic web measurably change how often galaxies are detected in HI, reducing detections in low-density late-type galaxies and enhancing them in massive early-type galaxies.

  2. Identifying backsplash galaxies using machine learning

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Machine learning trained on The Three Hundred simulations identifies backsplash galaxies in cluster outskirts with ~75% purity/completeness, and has been applied to HI-tail galaxies in Virgo.

  3. On the relationship between the cosmic web and the alignment of galaxies and AGN jets

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Massive galaxies within about 11 Mpc of cosmic filaments align their optical major axes with the filaments, and their radio jets become more randomly oriented relative to the host within about 8 Mpc.

  4. The Environmental Quenching Mechanisms of Field Dwarf Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In TNG50, all quenched field dwarf galaxies are environmental casualties, split between backsplash from massive hosts and cosmic-web stripping in filaments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

188 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    K., et al., 2006, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/497917 , 162, 38

    Adelman‐McCarthy J. K., et al., 2006, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/497917 , 162, 38

    doi:10.1086/497917 2006

  2. [2]

    P., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/17 , 211, 17

    Ahn C. P., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/17 , 211, 17

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/17 2014

  3. [3]

    Aihara H., et al., 2018, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan] 10.1093/pasj/psx066 , 70, S4

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  4. [4]

    Aihara H., et al., 2022, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan] 10.1093/pasj/psab122 , 74, 247

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  5. [5]

    B., Christensen C

    Akins H. B., Christensen C. R., Brooks A. M., Munshi F., Applebaum E., Engelhardt A., Chamberland L., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe2ab , 909, 139

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe2ab 2021

  6. [6]

    Ando M., Shimasaku K., Ito K., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac3251 , 519, 13

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3251 2023

  7. [7]

    Annunziatella M., et al., 2016, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527399 , 585, A160

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527399 2016

  8. [8]

    E., et al., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt2129 , 439, 48

    Applegate D. E., et al., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt2129 , 439, 48

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2129 2014

Show all 188 references
  1. [9]

    C., Groth E

    Argyres P. C., Groth E. J., Peebles P. J. E., Struble M. F., 1986, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/114025 , 91, 471

    1986 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , 47, 481

    2009

  3. [11]

    G., Prada F., Zentner A

    Azzaro M., Patiri S. G., Prada F., Zentner A. R., 2007, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00282.x , 376, L43

    2007

  4. [12]

    Baade D., et al., 1999, The Messenger, 95, 15

    1999

  5. [13]

    D., Power C., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa3979 , 501, 5948

    Bakels L., Ludlow A. D., Power C., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa3979 , 501, 5948

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    L., Navarro J

    Balogh M. L., Navarro J. F., Morris S. L., 2000, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/309323 , 540, 113

    2000 doi

  7. [17]

    E., Hernquist L., 1996, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/177957 , 471, 115

    Barnes J. E., Hernquist L., 1996, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/177957 , 471, 115

    1996 doi

  8. [18]

    H., Hearin A

    Behroozi P., Wechsler R. H., Hearin A. P., Conroy C., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz1182 , 488, 3143

    2019 doi

  9. [19]

    Ben \' tez N., 2000, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/308947 , 536, 571

    2000 doi

  10. [20]

    P., Haines C

    Bianconi M., Smith G. P., Haines C. P., McGee S. L., Finoguenov A., Egami E., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx167 , 473, L79

    2018 doi

  11. [21]

    Binggeli B., 1982, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 107, 338

    1982

  12. [22]

    B \^ rzan L., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa1594 , 496, 2613

    2020 doi

  13. [23]

    Biviano A., et al., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321955 , 558, A1

    2013 doi

  14. [24]

    C., Edge A

    Boehringer H., Voges W., Fabian A. C., Edge A. C., Neumann D. M., 1993, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/264.1.L25 , 264, L25

    1993 doi

  15. [25]

    R., Kofman L., Pogosyan D., 1996, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/380603a0 , 380, 603

    Bond J. R., Kofman L., Pogosyan D., 1996, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/380603a0 , 380, 603

    1996 doi

  16. [26]

    Boselli A., et al., 2014, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424419 , 570, A69

    2014 doi

  17. [27]

    G., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/432713 , 628, L101

    Brainerd T. G., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/432713 , 628, L101

    2005 doi

  18. [28]

    B., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/0067-0049/226/1/6 , 226, 6

    Brammer G. B., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/0067-0049/226/1/6 , 226, 6

    2016 doi

  19. [30]

    A., 1984, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/162519 , 285, 426

    Butcher H., Oemler Jr. A., 1984, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/162519 , 285, 426

    1984 doi

  20. [31]

    Byrd G., Valtonen M., 1990, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/168362 , 350, 89

    1990 doi

  21. [32]

    Carter D., Metcalfe N., 1980, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/191.2.325 , 191, 325

    1980 doi

  22. [33]

    Catelan P., Theuns T., 1996, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/282.2.455 , 282, 455

    1996 doi

  23. [34]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/376392 , 115, 763

    2003 doi

  24. [35]

    Chartab N., et al., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab61fd , 890, 7

    2020 doi

  25. [36]

    Cielo S., Babul A., Antonuccio-Delogu V., Silk J., Volonteri M., 2018, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832582 , 617, A58

    2018 doi

  26. [37]

    C., Newman J

    Cooper M. C., Newman J. A., Madgwick D. S., Gerke B. F., Yan R., Davis M., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/432868 , 634, 833

    2005 doi

  27. [38]

    Cortese L., Gavazzi G., Boselli A., Iglesias-Paramo J., Carrasco L., 2004, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040381 , 425, 429

    2004 doi

  28. [39]

    C., O'Neil K., Sakai S., 2006, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064873 , 453, 847

    Cortese L., Gavazzi G., Boselli A., Franzetti P., Kennicutt R. C., O'Neil K., Sakai S., 2006, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064873 , 453, 847

    2006 doi

  29. [40]

    Cousins A. W. J., 1978, Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of South Africa, 37, 8

    1978

  30. [41]

    P., Pimbblet K

    Crossett J. P., Pimbblet K. A., Jones D. H., Brown M. J. I., Stott J. P., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw2228 , 464, 480

    2017 doi

  31. [42]

    Cui W., et al., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty2111 , 480, 2898

    2018 doi

  32. [43]

    Darvish B., Mobasher B., Sobral D., Rettura A., Scoville N., Faisst A., Capak P., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/113 , 825, 113

    2016 doi

  33. [46]

    Despali G., Giocoli C., Bonamigo M., Limousin M., Tormen G., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw3129 , 466, 181

    2017 doi

  34. [47]

    C., Lin W

    Dong X. C., Lin W. P., Kang X., Wang Y. O., Dutton A. A., Macci \`o A. V., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/2041-8205/791/2/L33 , 791, L33

    2014 doi

  35. [48]

    T., Tojeiro R., Kraljic K., 2022, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-022-01619-w , 6, 599

    Donnan C. T., Tojeiro R., Kraljic K., 2022, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-022-01619-w , 6, 599

    2022 doi

  36. [49]

    Dressler A., 1980, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/157753 , 236, 351

    1980 doi

  37. [50]

    A., 1987, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/114524 , 94, 899

    Dressler A., Shectman S. A., 1987, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/114524 , 94, 899

    1987 doi

  38. [51]

    Dressler A., et al., 2011, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/658908 , 123, 288

    2011 doi

  39. [52]

    M., Gladders M

    Dressler A., Oemler A., Poggianti B. M., Gladders M. D., Abramson L., Vulcani B., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/62 , 770, 62

    2013 doi

  40. [53]

    M., Putman M., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz139 , 490, L6

    D z ud z ar R., Kilborn V., Murugeshan C., Meurer G., Sweet S. M., Putman M., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz139 , 490, L6

    2019 doi

  41. [54]

    C., Henry J

    Ebeling H., Edge A. C., Henry J. P., 2001, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/320958 , 553, 668

    2001 doi

  42. [55]

    Ebeling H., Barrett E., Donovan D., 2004, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/422750 , 609, L49

    2004 doi

  43. [56]

    Einasto M., et al., 2020, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037982 , 641, A172

    2020 doi

  44. [58]

    Estrada N., et al., 2023, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245070 , 671, A146

    2023 doi

  45. [59]

    Etherington J., Thomas D., 2015, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stv999 , 451, 660

    2015 doi

  46. [60]

    S., White S

    Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., Davis M., Efstathiou G., 1988, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/166213 , 327, 507

    1988 doi

  47. [61]

    Fujita Y., 2004, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan] 10.1093/pasj/56.1.29 , 56, 29

    2004 doi

  48. [62]

    E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D

    Fukugita M., Ichikawa T., Gunn J. E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D. P., 1996, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/117915 , 111, 1748

    1996 doi

  49. [63]

    Gill S. P. D., Knebe A., Gibson B. K., 2005, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08562.x , 356, 1327

    2005

  50. [64]

    J., Makler M., Garc \' a Lambas D., Chalela M., Pereira M

    Gonzalez E. J., Makler M., Garc \' a Lambas D., Chalela M., Pereira M. E. S., Van Waerbeke L., Shan H., Erben T., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa3570 , 501, 5239

    2021 doi

  51. [65]

    Govoni F., et al., 2019, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aat7500 , 364, 981

    2019 doi

  52. [66]

    Grillo C., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/78 , 822, 78

    2016 doi

  53. [67]

    S., Shao S., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac1292 , 514, 390

    Gu Q., Guo Q., Zhang T., Cautun M., Lacey C., Frenk C. S., Shao S., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac1292 , 514, 390

    2022 doi

  54. [68]

    E., Gott III J

    Gunn J. E., Gott III J. R., 1972, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/151605 , 176, 1

    1972 doi

  55. [69]

    K., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfe2 , 866, 78

    Han S., Smith R., Choi H., Cortese L., Catinella B., Contini E., Yi S. K., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfe2 , 866, 78

    2018 doi

  56. [70]

    R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    2020 doi

  57. [71]

    M., Best P

    Heckman T. M., Best P. N., 2014, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 , 52, 589

    2014 doi

  58. [73]

    Hlavacek-Larrondo J., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/163 , 777, 163

    2013 doi

  59. [74]

    Hoosain M., et al., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae174 , 528, 4139

    2024 doi

  60. [75]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Kere s D., 2008, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/524362 , 175, 356

    2008 doi

  61. [76]

    F., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Cox T. J., Hernquist L., Narayanan D., Hayward C. C., Murray N., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt017 , 430, 1901

    2013 doi

  62. [77]

    E., Chen Y.-C., Rozo E., Rykoff E., Baxter E

    Huang H.-J., Mandelbaum R., Freeman P. E., Chen Y.-C., Rozo E., Rykoff E., Baxter E. J., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw1982 , 463, 222

    2016 doi

  63. [78]

    E., Chen Y.-C., Rozo E., Rykoff E., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx2995 , 474, 4772

    Huang H.-J., Mandelbaum R., Freeman P. E., Chen Y.-C., Rozo E., Rykoff E., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx2995 , 474, 4772

    2018 doi

  64. [79]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  65. [80]

    M., Gavazzi G., 2002, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011830 , 384, 383

    Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., Boselli A., Cortese L., V \' lchez J. M., Gavazzi G., 2002, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011830 , 384, 383

    2002 doi

  66. [81]

    Jian H.-Y., et al., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/acfc22 , 957, 85

    2023 doi

  67. [82]

    L., Morgan W

    Johnson H. L., Morgan W. W., 1953, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/145697 , 117, 313

    1953 doi

  68. [83]

    D., Wadsley J., Parker L

    Joshi G. D., Wadsley J., Parker L. C., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx803 , 468, 4625

    2017 doi

  69. [84]

    C., Yang X., Mao S., Mo H

    Kang X., Van Den Bosch F. C., Yang X., Mao S., Mo H. J., Li C., Jing Y. P., 2007, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11902.x , 378, 1531

    2007

  70. [85]

    Karp J. S. M., Lange J. U., Wechsler R. H., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd3e9 , 949, L13

    2023 doi

  71. [86]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x , 341, 33

    2003

  72. [87]

    Kawinwanichakij L., et al., 2017, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b75 , 847, 134

    2017 doi

  73. [88]

    L., et al., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1946 , 439, 28

    Kelly P. L., et al., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1946 , 439, 28

    2014 doi

  74. [89]

    Kiessling A., et al., 2015, @doi [Space Science Reviews] 10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6 , 193, 67

    2015 doi

  75. [90]

    Kirk D., et al., 2015, @doi [Space Science Reviews] 10.1007/s11214-015-0213-4 , 193, 139

    2015 doi

  76. [91]

    Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottl \"o ber S., Prada F., He S., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw248 , 457, 4340

    2016 doi

  77. [93]

    Kraljic K., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz3319 , 491, 4294

    2020 doi

  78. [94]

    V., Borgani S., 2012, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 , 50, 353

    Kravtsov A. V., Borgani S., 2012, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 , 50, 353

    2012 doi

  79. [95]

    G., Whitaker K

    Kriek M., Van Dokkum P. G., Whitaker K. E., Labb \'e I., Franx M., Brammer G. B., 2011, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/168 , 743, 168

    2011 doi

  80. [96]

    Kuchner U., et al., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab3419 , 510, 581

    2021 doi

  81. [97]

    G., Groth E

    Lambas D. G., Groth E. J., Peebles P. J. E., 1988, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/114695 , 95, 996

    1988 doi

  82. [98]

    B., Tinsley B

    Larson R. B., Tinsley B. M., Caldwell C. N., 1980, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/157917 , 237, 692

    1980 doi

  83. [99]

    I., Knebe A., Hoffman Y., Gottl \"o ber S., Yepes G., Steinmetz M., 2011, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17786.x , 411, 1525

    Libeskind N. I., Knebe A., Hoffman Y., Gottl \"o ber S., Yepes G., Steinmetz M., 2011, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17786.x , 411, 1525

    2011

  84. [100]

    I., Hoffman Y., Forero-Romero J., Gottlober S., Knebe A., Steinmetz M., Klypin A., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sts216 , 428, 2489

    Libeskind N. I., Hoffman Y., Forero-Romero J., Gottlober S., Knebe A., Steinmetz M., Klypin A., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sts216 , 428, 2489

    2013 doi

  85. [101]

    W., Kimble R

    MacKenty J. W., Kimble R. A., O'Connell R. W., Townsend J. A., 2008, in Jr. J. M. O., de Graauw M. W. M., MacEwen H. A., eds, Vol. 7010, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2008: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter. SPIE, p. 70101F, @doi 10.1117/12.790039 , https://doi.org/10.1...

    2008 doi

  86. [102]

    W., Kimble R

    MacKenty J. W., Kimble R. A., O'Connell R. W., Townsend J. A., 2010, in Jr. J. M. O., Clampin M. C., MacEwen H. A., eds, Vol. 7731, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2010: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave. SPIE, p. 77310Z, @doi 10.1117/12.857533 , https://doi.org/10.1...

    2010 doi

  87. [103]

    Macconi D., Grandi P., Gitti M., Vignali C., Torresi E., Brighenti F., 2022, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202143024 , 660, A32

    2022 doi

  88. [104]

    A., Sanchis T., Salvador-Sol \'e E., Solanes J

    Mamon G. A., Sanchis T., Salvador-Sol \'e E., Solanes J. M., 2004, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034155 , 414, 445

    2004 doi

  89. [105]

    B., et al., 2015, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stu2096 , 446, 2205

    Mantz A. B., et al., 2015, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stu2096 , 446, 2205

    2015 doi

  90. [106]

    B., et al., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw2250 , 463, 3582

    Mantz A. B., et al., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw2250 , 463, 3582

    2016 doi

  91. [107]

    N., Mezcua M., 2019, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4885 , 884, L45

    Mart \' n-Navarro I., Burchett J. N., Mezcua M., 2019, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4885 , 884, L45

    2019 doi

  92. [108]

    Mart \' n-Navarro I., Pillepich A., Nelson D., Rodriguez-Gomez V., Donnari M., Hernquist L., Springel V., 2021, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-021-03545-9 , 594, 187

    2021 doi

  93. [109]

    J., Muriel H., Coenda V., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stv2295 , 455, 127

    Mart \' nez H. J., Muriel H., Coenda V., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stv2295 , 455, 127

    2016 doi

  94. [110]

    L., Balogh M

    McGee S. L., Balogh M. L., Bower R. G., Font A. S., McCarthy I. G., 2009, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15507.x , 400, 937

    2009

  95. [111]

    McNamara B., Nulsen P., 2007, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625 , 45, 117

    2007 arXiv

  96. [112]

    R., Nulsen P

    McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., Wise M. W., Rafferty D. A., Carilli C., Sarazin C. L., Blanton E. L., 2005, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature03202 , 433, 45

    2005 doi

  97. [113]

    Mercurio A., Massarotti M., Merluzzi P., Girardi M., La Barbera F., Busarello G., 2003, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030971 , 408, 57

    2003 doi

  98. [115]

    Merten J., et al., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/4 , 806, 4

    2015 doi

  99. [116]

    C., Hernquist L., 1994, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/187460 , 431, L9

    Mihos J. C., Hernquist L., 1994, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/187460 , 431, L9

    1994 doi

  100. [117]

    Miyazaki S., et al., 2002, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan] 10.1093/pasj/54.6.833 , 54, 833

    2002 doi

  101. [118]

    S., Ramsay S

    Miyazaki S., et al., 2012, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. SPIE, p. 84460Z, @doi 10.1117/12.926844 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926844

    2012 doi

  102. [119]

    Molino A., et al., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx1243 , 470, 95

    2017 doi

  103. [120]

    Monna A., et al., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx015 , p. stx015

    2017 doi

  104. [121]

    Moore B., Katz N., Lake G., Dressler A., Oemler A., 1996, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/379613a0 , 379, 613

    1996 doi

  105. [122]

    Moore B., Ghigna S., Governato F., Lake G., Quinn T., Stadel J., Tozzi P., 1999, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/312287 , 524, L19

    1999 doi

  106. [124]

    Nelson D., et al., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 , 475, 624

    2018 doi

  107. [125]

    Nelson D., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz2306 , 490, 3234

    2019 doi

  108. [126]

    Nulsen P. E. J., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., David L. P., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/430845 , 628, 629

    2005 doi

  109. [127]

    Oguri M., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stu1446 , 444, 147

    2014 doi

  110. [128]

    Oguri M., et al., 2018, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan] 10.1093/pasj/psx042 , 70, S20

    2018 doi

  111. [129]

    Okabe T., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz3057 , p. stz3057

    2019 doi

  112. [130]

    L., Mercurio A., Rosati P., Balestra I., Nonino M., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty1669 , 479, 2328

    Olave-Rojas D., Cerulo P., Demarco R., Jaff \'e Y. L., Mercurio A., Rosati P., Balestra I., Nonino M., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty1669 , 479, 2328

    2018 doi

  113. [131]

    E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 , 9, 10

    Oliphant T. E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 , 9, 10

    2007 doi

  114. [132]

    Olivares V., et al., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace359 , 954, 56

    2023 doi

  115. [133]

    A., 2016, @doi [The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review] 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3 , 24, 14

    Overzier R. A., 2016, @doi [The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review] 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3 , 24, 14

    2016 doi

  116. [134]

    K., Fabian A

    Panagoulia E. K., Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Hlavacek-Larrondo J., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stu1499 , 444, 1236

    2014 doi

  117. [135]

    J., Lambas D

    Paz D. J., Lambas D. G., Padilla N., Merchan M., 2006, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09934.x , 366, 1503

    2006

  118. [136]

    J., Sgr \'o M

    Paz D. J., Sgr \'o M. A., Merch \'a n M., Padilla N., 2011, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18518.x , 414, 2029

    2011

  119. [137]

    Peng Y.-j., et al., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193 , 721, 193

    2010 doi

  120. [138]

    J., Renzini A., Carollo M., 2012, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/4 , 757, 4

    Peng Y.-j., Lilly S. J., Renzini A., Carollo M., 2012, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/4 , 757, 4

    2012 doi

  121. [139]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature23462 , 548, 304

    Poggianti B. M., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature23462 , 548, 304

    2017 doi

  122. [140]

    Postman M., et al., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/428881 , 623, 721

    2005 doi

  123. [141]

    Postman M., et al., 2012, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/25 , 199, 25

    2012 doi

  124. [142]

    Putman M., Peek J., Joung M., 2012, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125612 , 50, 491

    2012 doi

  125. [143]

    A., McNamara B

    Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., Wise M. W., 2006, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/507672 , 652, 216

    2006 doi

  126. [144]

    L., Borgani S., De Propris R., Garc \' a Lambas D., Murante G., Rasia E., West M., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa1389 , 495, 2436

    Ragone-Figueroa C., Granato G. L., Borgani S., De Propris R., Garc \' a Lambas D., Murante G., Rasia E., West M., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa1389 , 495, 2436

    2020 doi

  127. [145]

    O., 1975, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/153820 , 200, 535

    Richstone D. O., 1975, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/153820 , 200, 535

    1975 doi

  128. [146]

    O., 1976, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/154213 , 204, 642

    Richstone D. O., 1976, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/154213 , 204, 642

    1976 doi

  129. [147]

    D., Parker L

    Roberts I. D., Parker L. C., Brown T., Joshi G. D., Hlavacek-Larrondo J., Wadsley J., 2019, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04f7 , 873, 42

    2019 doi

  130. [148]

    Rodriguez-Gomez V., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty3345 , 483, 4140

    2019 doi

  131. [149]

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Behroozi P., Primack J., Klypin A., Lee C., Hellinger D., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw1705 , 462, 893

    2016 doi

  132. [150]

    Rosati P., et al., 2014, The Messenger, 158, 48

    2014

  133. [151]

    S., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/104 , 785, 104

    Rykoff E. S., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/104 , 785, 104

    2014 doi

  134. [152]

    Sakai S., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., Van Der Hulst J. M., Moss C., 2002, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/342622 , 578, 842

    2002 doi

  135. [153]

    M., Mart \' nez H

    Salerno J. M., Mart \' nez H. J., Muriel H., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty3456 , 484, 2

    2019 doi

  136. [154]

    Santucci G., et al., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad713 , 521, 2671

    2023 doi

  137. [155]

    Sarron F., Adami C., Durret F., Laigle C., 2019, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935394 , 632, A49

    2019 doi

  138. [156]

    N., 1968, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/128626 , 80, 252

    Sastry G. N., 1968, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/128626 , 80, 252

    1968 doi

  139. [157]

    L., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty3258 , 483, 2851

    Schaefer A. L., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty3258 , 483, 2851

    2019 doi

  140. [158]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/305772 , 500, 525

    1998 doi

  141. [159]

    B., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L36 , 782, L36

    Schmidt K. B., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L36 , 782, L36

    2014 doi

  142. [160]

    J., Peebles P

    Seldner M., Siebers B., Groth E. J., Peebles P. J. E., 1977, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/112039 , 82, 249

    1977 doi

  143. [161]

    Sereno M., Ettori S., Umetsu K., Baldi A., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sts186 , 428, 2241

    2013 doi

  144. [162]

    W., et al., 2017, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , 598, A104

    Shimwell T. W., et al., 2017, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , 598, A104

    2017 doi

  145. [163]

    W., et al., 2019, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833559 , 622, A1

    Shimwell T. W., et al., 2019, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833559 , 622, A1

    2019 doi

  146. [164]

    S., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/31 , 227, 31

    Shin J., Woo J.-H., Mulchaey J. S., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/31 , 227, 31

    2016 doi

  147. [165]

    Smargon A., Mandelbaum R., Bahcall N., Niederste-Ostholt M., 2012, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20923.x , 423, 856

    2012

  148. [166]

    Smith R., et al., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad2535 , 525, 4685

    2023 doi

  149. [167]

    Steyrleithner P., Hensler G., Boselli A., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa775 , 494, 1114

    2020 doi

  150. [168]

    P., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac089 , 511, 2659

    Stott J. P., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac089 , 511, 2659

    2022 doi

  151. [169]

    F., Rood H

    Struble M. F., Rood H. J., 1999, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/313274 , 125, 35

    1999 doi

  152. [170]

    Tempel E., et al., 2014, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423585 , 566, A1

    2014 doi

  153. [171]

    The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , 558, A33

    2013 doi

  154. [172]

    The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , 156, 123

    2018 doi

  155. [173]

    J., Botteon A., R \"o ttgering H

    Timmerman R., Van Weeren R. J., Botteon A., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., McNamara B. R., Sweijen F., B \^ rzan L., Morabito L. K., 2022, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243936 , 668, A65

    2022 doi

  156. [174]

    Treu T., et al., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/114 , 812, 114

    2015 doi

  157. [175]

    Treu T., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/60 , 817, 60

    2016 doi

  158. [176]

    Umetsu K., et al., 2012, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/56 , 755, 56

    2012 doi

  159. [177]

    Umetsu K., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/163 , 795, 163

    2014 doi

  160. [178]

    P., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa1837 , 496, 3841

    Vaughan S. P., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa1837 , 496, 3841

    2020 doi

  161. [179]

    Vega-Ferrero J., Yepes G., Gottl \"o ber S., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx282 , 467, 3226

    2017 doi

  162. [180]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , 17, 261

    2020 doi

  163. [181]

    Von Der Linden A., et al., 2014, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1945 , 439, 2

    2014 doi

  164. [182]

    J., Li C., Van Den Bosch F

    Wang Y., Yang X., Mo H. J., Li C., Van Den Bosch F. C., Fan Z., Chen X., 2008, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12927.x , 385, 1511

    2008

  165. [183]

    Wang K., Peng Y., Chen Y., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1169 , 523, 1268

    2023 doi

  166. [184]

    Weinberger R., et al., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw2944 , 465, 3291

    2017 doi

  167. [185]

    C., Brinkman B., Canizares C., Garmire G., Murray S., Van Speybroeck L

    Weisskopf M. C., Brinkman B., Canizares C., Garmire G., Murray S., Van Speybroeck L. P., 2002, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/338108 , 114, 1

    2002 doi

  168. [186]

    E., 2018, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629007 , 613, A4

    Welker C., Dubois Y., Pichon C., Devriendt J., Chisari N. E., 2018, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629007 , 613, A4

    2018 doi

  169. [187]

    V., Hatch N

    Werner S. V., Hatch N. A., Muzzin A., van der Burg R. F. J., Balogh M. L., Rudnick G., Wilson G., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab3484 , 510, 674

    2021 doi

  170. [188]

    J., 1994, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/268.1.79 , 268, 79

    West M. J., 1994, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/268.1.79 , 268, 79

    1994 doi

  171. [189]

    W., McNamara B

    Wise M. W., McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., Houck J. C., David L. P., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/512767 , 659, 1153

    2007 doi

  172. [190]

    C., Mo H

    Yang X., Van Den Bosch F. C., Mo H. J., Mao S., Kang X., Weinmann S. M., Guo Y., Jing Y. P., 2006, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10373.x , 369, 1293

    2006

  173. [191]

    K., Lee J., Jung I., Ji I., Sheen Y.-K., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321369 , 554, A122

    Yi S. K., Lee J., Jung I., Ji I., Sheen Y.-K., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321369 , 554, A122

    2013 doi

  174. [192]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/301513 , 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.1086/301513 , 120, 1579

    2000 doi

  175. [193]

    I., Mulchaey J

    Zabludoff A. I., Mulchaey J. S., 1998, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/311312 , 498, L5

    1998 doi

  176. [194]

    Zakharova D., McGee S., Vulcani B., De Lucia G., 2025, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452296 , 693, A113

    2025 doi

  177. [195]

    Zhang H., Zaritsky D., 2022, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9c64 , 941, 18

    2022 doi

  178. [196]

    R., Hatch N

    de Vos K., Merrifield M. R., Hatch N. A., 2024, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stae1403 , 531, 4383

    2024 doi

  179. [197]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , 556, A2

    2013 doi

  180. [198]

    van Uitert E., Joachimi B., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx756 , 468, 4502

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.