Photonic torons, topological phase transition and tunable spin monopoles

Cheng-Wei Qiu; Haijun Wu; Haiwen Wang; Nilo Mata-Cervera; Yijie Shen; Zhihan Zhu

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Photonic torons, topological phase transition and tunable spin monopoles

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first experimental construction of photonic spin torons in free-space vector structured light, with continuous topological phase transitions to hopfions, skyrmioniums, and tunable spin monopole pairs.

desk verdict First experimental polar spin torons in light, but the 3D topology is inferred through paraxial longitudinal fields; needs a nonparaxial check before the strongest claims are citation-ready. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08083 v1 pith:I7DEBWUV submitted 2024-12-11 physics.optics

Haijun Wu , Nilo Mata-Cervera , Haiwen Wang , Zhihan Zhu , Cheng-Wei Qiu , Yijie Shen This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics

keywords photonicspintoronsmonopolestopologicalphasetransitionvectorstructuredlightopticalskyrmionshopfionsskyrmioniumemergentmagneticfield

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first experimental creation of torons in a light field. Torons are three-dimensional chiral spin textures that combine a stack of skyrmion layers with a pair of point defects; they had previously appeared only as nonpolar structures in liquid crystals, while polar torons existed only in theoretical models. The authors build the toron from the spin angular momentum density of a shaped vector laser beam, and by tuning two mode coefficients they drive the same field through four topological phases: toron, hopfion, skyrmionium, and monopole pair. They also show continuous control of the toron's handedness and of the helicity of each spin monopole. This makes free-space light a reconfigurable platform for studying topological quasiparticles and synthetic magnetic monopoles.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the normalized photonic spin vector $s(x,y,z)=S/|S|$, where $S=(1/4\omega)[\epsilon_0\,\mathrm{Im}(E^*\times E)+\mu_0\,\mathrm{Im}(H^*\times H)]$ is the total spin angular momentum density of the monochromatic field. A toron is defined by two point zeros of $s$ on the propagation axis; any sphere enclosing a zero has the spin direction covering the unit sphere once (winding number in $\pi_2(S^2)=\mathbb{Z}$), and between the zeros the texture is a stack of 2D skyrmion layers with $N_{sk}=\pm1$. The field is engineered as $E_\perp=\alpha\psi_{0,0}e_R+[\beta\psi_{0,0}-(1-\beta)\psi_{0,1}]e_L$, a superposition of two Laguerre-Gaussian modes in opposite circular polarizations; the longitudinal components needed for the third spin dimension come from the paraxial Lax relations $E_z=(i/k)\nabla\cdot E_\perp$ and $H_z=(i/k)\nabla\cdot H_\perp$. Tuning $\alpha$ and $\beta$ moves the system across a phase diagram, and the fiber-bundle picture of isospin lines shows the toron as a twisted connection between two hyperbolic monopoles. The Skyrme number $N_{sk}$ and Hopf number $N_{hp}$ label the phases, while the emergent magnetic field $B^{(\mathrm{em})}_i=\epsilon_{ijk}s\cdot(\partial_j s\times\partial_k s)/2$ supplies the source-sink picture of the monopole pair.

What would settle it

Reconstruct the same spin distribution from the measured transverse modes using full nonparaxial Maxwell propagation and locate the zeros of $S$: if the two zeros at $z=\pm z_m$ disappear, split, or change winding, the assignment of the toron and monopole-pair phases fails. A related but weaker check is to measure the longitudinal field component directly and compare its phase and amplitude with the Lax prediction near the zeros.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the photonic spin density of a focused vector beam can carry exact polar toron topology, not just the Stokes-vector textures used for earlier optical hopfions. Starting from a two-mode superposition of right- and left-circular Laguerre-Gaussian beams with weights α and β, the authors compute the total spin density $S=(1/4\omega)[\epsilon_0\,\mathrm{Im}(E^*\times E)+\mu_0\,\mathrm{Im}(H^*\times H)]$, normalize it, and show that its zeros form a monopole-antimonopole pair connected by twisted isospin fibers. Tuning $(\alpha,\beta)$ along the phase diagram passes through hopfion, toron, monopole-pair, and skyrmionium phases meeting at a four-phase junction. The same control continuously rotates the transverse spin around each monopole, giving tunable helicity, while the source-sink character of the emergent magnetic field stays fixed. These are, the paper argues, the first experimental observations of spin skyrmions, hopfions, torons, and monopole pairs in free-space light.

Load-bearing premise

The 3D spin texture is reconstructed by adding longitudinal field components through the paraxial Lax formulas; the point zeros that define the toron and monopole pair are therefore inferred from this approximation rather than directly measured, so the whole topological classification depends on that approximation being accurate at the experimental beam radius of $8\lambda$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single structured-light setup can now host four topologically distinct 3D spin states and continuously switch between any two of them by varying two real parameters, because the four nontrivial phases meet at one junction.
Optical spin torons are genuinely polar and classified by $\pi_2(S^2)$, unlike liquid-crystal torons whose head-tail symmetry gives $\pi_2(S^2/\mathbb{Z}_2)$, so they realize the polar toron that had been predicted in magnets but not observed.
Because the spin texture is insensitive to the intermodal phase between the two circular components, these quasiparticles should be less perturbed by phase noise than Stokes-vector skyrmions and hopfions, giving them higher topological stability.
The ability to tune monopole helicity and toron chirality independently, while preserving the emergent magnetic field's source-sink structure, offers a control knob for spin-orbit interactions and for transferring topology from light to matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the reconstruction uses paraxial Lax relations at a beam radius of $8\lambda$; a natural next check is full nonparaxial propagation of the same measured modes to see whether the two point zeros survive, since the entire toron classification rests on them.
Beyond the paper: the same two-mode superposition recipe should transfer to other wave systems with a spin-like vector density, such as acoustic, elastic, or water waves, because the construction needs only a complex vector field and a Gauss-law constraint.
Beyond the paper: if the zeros are robust, the isospin fibers connecting the monopole pair could serve as reconfigurable guiding tracks for nanoparticle motion or chiral light-matter interaction, a use the paper mentions only as a future possibility.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper delivers the first experimental construction of polar spin torons and tunable spin monopoles in free-space structured light, using a clean superposition of LG modes. The phase diagram and the chirality/helicity control are convincing as far as they go. But the 3D spin texture — the actual toron — is reconstructed, not measured: the longitudinal field comes from the paraxial Lax relations applied to the measured transverse field. Since the toron's point zeros are exactly where the spin vanishes, and those zeros are sensitive to small perturbations, I'd want a nonparaxial propagation check or a direct measurement of Ez/Hz before treating the first-observation claim as settled.

What's new: torons previously existed in liquid crystals (nonpolar) and were proposed in optics by Wang & Fan (refs 16,17). This paper experimentally realizes the polar version in photonic spin, shows transitions among toron/hopfion/skyrmionium/monopole-pair, and demonstrates tunable monopole helicity and toron chirality. The field construction is explicit and the topological classification uses measured spin field, not fitted parameters. That's a real step for structured light.

What's good: the experimental data show clear evolution of the spin textures, and the measured monopole angles match simulation in Fig. 4f. The proof that Stokes-vector polarization fields cannot host point defects (Supp. S7) is useful. The distinction between polar and nonpolar order parameters is well made.

Where it's soft: (1) the paraxial Lax relations for Ez and Hz — at beam radius 8λ the correction is small (~1/(16π)), so likely fine, but topological labels are zero-set-sensitive; near the phase boundaries in Fig. 2a a small shift could change the classification. A nonparaxial simulation of the same superposition would close the loop. (2) The Nsk and Nhp values are non-integer (e.g., -0.9444), and the singularity-exclusion cutoff isn't specified. That's not fatal — it's standard to remove the singular region — but the paper should state the cutoff and show convergence. (3) No error bars or repeated measurements; for a first-experiment claim, some sense of reproducibility would help. (4) 'Digital propagation' via DMD is a numerical propagation of the measured transverse field, not actual propagation; that's fine, but should be described as such.

Who this is for: people working on topological photonics and structured light. It's a solid experimental contribution that needs revision but deserves a serious referee. I'd send it to review with a request for the nonparaxial check and clearer topological number conventions.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the experimental construction of photonic spin torons and related three-dimensional topological spin textures in a focused vector light field, together with a theoretical model and phase diagram. The transverse electric field is written as an explicit superposition of LG modes with right- and left-circular polarizations, Eq. (2), with real coefficients α and β as experimental knobs. The longitudinal field components are obtained from the paraxial Lax relations, Eq. (3) and the following text, and the normalized optical spin s = S/|S| is computed from Eq. (1). The authors classify the resulting textures as hopfion, toron, monopole pair, skyrmionium, or trivial states, show a topological phase diagram (Fig. 2a), and report experimental propagation tomographies for representative states (Fig. 3). They further demonstrate tuning of monopole helicity and toron chirality through (α, β) (Fig. 4). The central claim is that these measurements constitute the first experimental observation of polar photonic spin torons and tunable spin monopoles in free space.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a significant advance: it transfers the toron concept, previously known in liquid-crystal and magnetic systems, to free-space optical spin fields, and demonstrates experimentally controllable topological phase transitions among four nontrivial spin textures. The construction in Eq. (2) is explicit and parameter-free in the topological classification; α and β are experimental controls rather than fitted parameters, and the topological numbers are computed from the reconstructed field, not imposed. The digital-propagation and complex-amplitude-profiling methodology is a sensible route to three-dimensional spin-field tomography. The main risk to significance is that the 3D topology is established from longitudinal field components that are inferred, not directly measured, so the experimental claim is conditional on the accuracy of the paraxial longitudinal-field model.

major comments (2)

[Results, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] The reported topological numbers are not integers. For example, the toron in Fig. 3 reports Nsk|z=z0 = -0.9444 and Nhp = 0.0573, the monopole pair reports Nhp = -0.3786, and the hopfion reports Nsk|z=z0 = 0.0292 and Nhp = -0.9782. The text notes that the integral must avoid the neighborhood of the singularity, but the exclusion radius or criterion is not specified. Since the phase classification in Fig. 2a and the experimental/theory comparison in Fig. 3 rely on these numbers, the manuscript should state the exclusion procedure, show how the computed numbers converge as the cutoff shrinks, and provide uncertainty estimates from camera noise, interpolation (Supplementary Material S6), and DMD phase calibration. As it stands, the comparison is not quantitatively closed, and the phase-transition claim rests partly on qualitative texture inspection.
[Methods, Digital propagation for 3D topological structures] The digital propagation technique captures the transverse field at multiple z planes, but the longitudinal components are still reconstructed via Gauss's law under the paraxial approximation. The Methods section states that an interpolation method was applied because the beam radius of 8λ is too small for the CMOS camera to capture with sufficient resolution. This interpolation enters the input to the longitudinal-field reconstruction, so its effect on the inferred Ez and Hz should be evaluated. A simple sensitivity test would be to repeat the reconstruction from a downsampled or interpolated synthetic field and compare the resulting topological labels.

minor comments (4)

[Figure 3 caption] The caption says panels a-h, but the main text discusses only a-d, e, and f; please clarify what panels g and h show or renumber the panels consistently.
[Figure 4 caption] In the caption, 'momopoles' appears twice; this should read 'monopoles'.
[Discussion] The sentence 'which we offers greater flexibility' contains a grammatical error; it should be 'which offers greater flexibility'.
[Discussion] The claim that each nontrivial phase is 'the first experimental report of free-space optical spin textures' should be stated more carefully, distinguishing spin textures from previously observed Stokes-vector textures (refs. 31, 33, 58, 59), so that the novelty claim is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the topological spin structures are constructed from a stated field ansatz and measured transverse data, not fitted or derived from their own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. It defines the optical spin S via Eq. (1), designs the transverse field E⊥ via Eq. (2) with control parameters α and β, obtains H⊥ via Eq. (3), and obtains Ez and Hz using the standard paraxial Lax relations (Ref. [55]). The topological numbers Nsk and Nhp are then computed from the resulting normalized spin field, not imposed or fitted. The phase diagram in Fig. 2 is a classification of this deterministic model; the experimental section measures E⊥ and reconstructs Ez through Gauss's law, so the 3D spin texture is a model-dependent reconstruction rather than a direct measurement. That is a physical-validity limitation (paraxial approximation at 8λ beam radius could affect zero-set topology), but it is not circularity: the output topological labels are functions of the measured transverse data through a stated relation, and no parameter is fit to the target labels. Self-citations provide background, prior theoretical monopole models, and structured-light context; none carries the load-bearing derivation, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work. The claim is a construction/demonstration, not an independent prediction reducing to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical fields or particles are introduced; the structures are configurations of the standard optical spin density. The main unverified inputs are the paraxial longitudinal-field model and the boundary choices in computing topological numbers.

free parameters (3)

alpha (α) = 0.18, 0.33, 0.48, 0.6, 0.8 in examples
Complex amplitude coefficient of the RCP LG00 component; tuned by hand to select toron, hopfion, skyrmionium, or monopole-pair phases; not fitted to data.
beta (β) = 0.33, 0.47, 0.55, 0.7, 0.86 in examples
Complex amplitude coefficient controlling the LCP mode superposition; tuned by hand; determines phase region and chirality.
Spin-zero exclusion radius in Nsk/Nhp integrals = not specified
Topological numbers are computed after excluding a neighborhood of the spin singularities; the reported toron Nsk values (-0.9444, -0.9738, -0.9915) depend on this cutoff, and its size is not stated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Paraxial Lax approximation gives longitudinal fields Ez=(i/k)nabla dot E_perp and Hz=(i/k)nabla dot H_perp
Used to construct the full 3D spin field from measured transverse field; may fail for tightly focused beams.
domain assumption Slowly varying envelope approximation relates transverse magnetic field to electric field via H_perp = (-Ey/Z0, Ex/Z0)
Used in Eq. (3) before deriving longitudinal components.
standard math The spin field S, normalized as s=S/|S|, is a valid order parameter with homotopy group pi2(S2)=Z
Basis for defining Skyrme and Hopf numbers; a standard topological classification.
domain assumption Measured transverse wavefunction and digital propagation reproduce the true 3D field
3D tomography is synthesized by DMD phase encoding, not by direct volumetric measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photonic torons, topological phase transition and tunable spin monopoles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I7DEBWUV

@misc{pith2026241208083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photonic torons, topological phase transition and tunable spin monopoles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I7DEBWUV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08083}
}

read the original abstract

Creation and control of topological complex excitations play crucial roles in both fundamental physics and modern information science. Torons are a sophisticated class of 3D chiral polar topological structures with both skyrmionic quasiparticle textures and monopole point defects, so far only observed in liquid crystal nonpolar models. Here, we experimentally construct torons with the photonic spin of vector structured light and demonstrate the topological phase transitions among diverse topological states: torons, hopfions, skyrmioniums and monopole pairs. We can also continually tune the toron's chirality and the helical spin textures of emerging monopole pairs. The birth of photonic torons and tunable monopoles opens a flexible platform for studying nontrivial light-matter interaction and topological informatics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08083 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** f shows a toron with opposite chirality to the cases of Figs. 3b and 3e. Tuning spin monopole helicity Synthetic magnetic monopole is an important physical concept, however, how to tune the monopole texture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Lin, Z.-K. et al. Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid-state lattices. Nature Re- views Physics 5, 483–495 (2023)

work page 2023
[2]

Haldane, F. D. M. Nobel lecture: Topological quantum matter. Reviews of Modern Physics89, 040502 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

A., Felser, C

Bernevig, B. A., Felser, C. & Beidenkopf, H. Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials. Nature 603, 41–51 (2022)

2022
[4]

Han, L. et al. High-density switchable skyrmion-like po- lar nanodomains integrated on silicon. Nature 603, 63–67 (2022)

2022
[5]

Chen, S. et al. All-electrical skyrmionic magnetic tunnel junction. Nature 627, 522–527 (2024)

2024
[6]

& Cros, V

Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1–15 (2017)

2017
[7]

& Zheludev, N

Papasimakis, N., Fedotov, V., Savinov, V., Raybould, T. & Zheludev, N. Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space. Nature Materials 15, 263–271 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

& Shen, Y

Wan, Z., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Fu, X. & Shen, Y. Ultra- degree-of-freedom structured light for ultracapacity in- formation carriers. ACS Photonics10, 2149–2164 (2023)

2023

Show all 59 references

[9]

Carrigan Jr, R. A. & Trower, W. P. Magnetic monopoles. Nature 305, 673–678 (1983)

1983
[10]

& Sondhi, S

Castelnovo, C., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Nature 451, 42–45 (2008)

2008
[11]

& Zhang, S.-C

Qi, X.-L., Li, R., Zang, J. & Zhang, S.-C. Inducing a magnetic monopole with topological surface states. Sci- ence 323, 1184–1187 (2009)

2009
[12]

& Verbeeck, J

B´ ech´ e, A., Van Boxem, R., Van Tendeloo, G. & Verbeeck, J. Magnetic monopole field exposed by electrons. Nature Physics 10, 26–29 (2014)

2014
[13]

Kanazawa, N. et al. Direct observation of the statics and dynamics of emergent magnetic monopoles in a chiral magnet. Physical Review Letters125, 137202 (2020)

2020
[14]

Rana, A. et al. Three-dimensional topological mag- netic monopoles and their interactions in a ferromagnetic meta-lattice. Nature nanotechnology18, 227–232 (2023)

2023
[15]

I., Edelstein, S., Serena, P

Marqu´ es, M. I., Edelstein, S., Serena, P. A., de Larrinzar, B. C. L. & Garcia-Mart ´ ın, A. Magneto-optical particles in isotropic spinning fields mimic magnetic monopoles. Physical Review Letters133, 046901 (2024)

2024
[16]

Wang, H., Wojcik, C. C. & Fan, S. Topological spin defects of light. Optica 9, 1417–1423 (2022)

2022
[17]

& Fan, S

Wang, H. & Fan, S. Photonic spin hopfions and monopole loops. Physical Review Letters131, 263801 (2023)

2023
[18]

Tsesses, S. et al. Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields. Science 361, 993–996 (2018)

2018
[19]

Du, L., Yang, A., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Deep- subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a con- fined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momen- tum. Nature Physics 15, 650–654 (2019)

2019
[20]

Davis, T. J. et al. Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with deep subwavelength resolution. Science 368 (2020)

2020
[21]

Bogdanov, A. N. & Panagopoulos, C. Physical founda- tions and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Reviews Physics 2, 492–498 (2020)

2020
[22]

et al.Two-dimensional skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and ferromagnets

Foster, D. et al.Two-dimensional skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and ferromagnets. Nature Physics 15, 655–659 (2019)

2019
[23]

Dai, Y. et al. Plasmonic topological quasiparticle on the nanometre and femtosecond scales. Nature 588, 616–619 (2020)

2020
[24]

Yu, X. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95–98 (2018)

2018
[25]

Jani, H. et al. Antiferromagnetic half-skyrmions and bimerons at room temperature. Nature 590, 74–79 (2021)

2021
[26]

& Zheludev, N

Shen, Y., Hou, Y., Papasimakis, N. & Zheludev, N. I. Supertoroidal light pulses as electromagnetic skyrmions propagating in free space. Nature communications 12, 5891 (2021)

2021
[27]

Zdagkas, A. et al. Observation of toroidal pulses of light. Nature Photonics 16, 523–528 (2022)

2022
[28]

& Zhan, Q

Wan, C., Cao, Q., Chen, J., Chong, A. & Zhan, Q. Toroidal vortices of light. Nature Photonics 16, 519–522 (2022)

2022
[29]

k´ arm´ an vor- tex streets

Shen, Y., Papasimakis, N. & Zheludev, N. I. Non- diffracting supertoroidal pulses and optical “k´ arm´ an vor- tex streets”. Nature Communications 15, 4863 (2024)

2024
[30]

Zheng, F. et al. Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet. Nature 623, 718–723 (2023). 8

2023
[31]

et al.Topological transformation and free-space transport of photonic hopfions

Shen, Y. et al.Topological transformation and free-space transport of photonic hopfions. Advanced Photonics 5, 015001 (2023)

2023
[32]

Rybakov, F. N. et al. Magnetic hopfions in solids. APL materials 10 (2022)

2022
[33]

Sugic, D. et al. Particle-like topologies in light. Nature communications 12, 6785 (2021)

2021
[34]

Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Three-dimensional crystals of adaptive knots. Science 365, 1449–1453 (2019)

2019
[35]

Tang, J. et al. Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current-driven dynamics. Nature Nanotechnology 1–6 (2021)

2021
[36]

Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Static three- dimensional topological solitons in fluid chiral ferromag- nets and colloids. Nature materials 16, 426–432 (2017)

2017
[37]

& Tretiakov, O

G¨ obel, B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative mag- netic quasiparticles. Physics Reports 895, 1–28 (2021)

2021
[38]

& Smalyukh, I

Wu, J.-S. & Smalyukh, I. I. Hopfions, heliknotons, skyrmions, torons and both abelian and nonabelian vor- tices in chiral liquid crystals. Liquid Crystals Reviews10, 34–68 (2022)

2022
[39]

Shen, Y. et al. Optical skyrmions and other topologi- cal quasiparticles of light. Nature Photonics 18, 15–25 (2024)

2024
[40]

I., Lansac, Y., Clark, N

Smalyukh, I. I., Lansac, Y., Clark, N. A. & Trivedi, R. P. Three-dimensional structure and multistable opti- cal switching of triple-twisted particle-like excitations in anisotropic fluids. Nature materials 9, 139–145 (2010)

2010
[41]

Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Diversity of knot soli- tons in liquid crystals manifested by linking of preimages in torons and hopfions. Physical Review X 7, 011006 (2017)

2017
[42]

Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Surface anchoring as a con- trol parameter for stabilizing torons, skyrmions, twisted walls, fingers, and their hybrids in chiral nematics. Phys- ical Review E101, 042702 (2020)

2020
[43]

J., Smalyukh, I

Peixoto, J., Hall, D., Broer, D. J., Smalyukh, I. I. & Liu, D. Mechanical actuation via homeomorphic transforma- tions of topological solitons within polymer coatings. Ad- vanced Materials 36, 2308425 (2024)

2024
[44]

B., Wu, J.-S

Zhao, H., Tai, J.-S. B., Wu, J.-S. & Smalyukh, I. I. Liq- uid crystal defect structures with m¨ obius strip topology. Nature Physics 19, 451–459 (2023)

2023
[45]

Zhao, H., Malomed, B. A. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological solitonic macromolecules. Nature Communications 14, 4581 (2023)

2023
[46]

Poy, G. et al. Interaction and co-assembly of optical and topological solitons. Nature Photonics 1–8 (2022)

2022
[47]

B., Hess, A

Tai, J.-S. B., Hess, A. J., Wu, J.-S. & Smalyukh, I. I. Field-controlled dynamics of skyrmions and monopoles. Science Advances10, eadj9373 (2024)

2024
[48]

Li, S. et al. Mutual conversion between a magnetic n´ eel hopfion and a n´ eel toron.Physical review B105, 174407 (2022)

2022
[49]

Liu, Y., Lake, R. K. & Zang, J. Binding a hopfion in a chiral magnet nanodisk. Physical Review B 98, 174437 (2018)

2018
[50]

Rays, waves, su (2) symmetry and geometry: toolkits for structured light

Shen, Y. Rays, waves, su (2) symmetry and geometry: toolkits for structured light. Journal of Optics23, 124004 (2021)

2021
[51]

& Dennis, M

Forbes, A., Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. Structured light. Nature Photonics 15, 253–262 (2021)

2021
[52]

& Forbes, A

He, C., Shen, Y. & Forbes, A. Towards higher- dimensional structured light. Light: Science & Appli- cations 11, 205 (2022)

2022
[53]

Wang, C.-J. et al. Formation of magnetic biskyrmions mediated by an intrinsic emergent monopole- antimonopole pair. npj Quantum Materials 7, 78 (2022)

2022
[54]

W., Ruokokoski, E., Kandel, S., M¨ ott¨ onen, M

Ray, M. W., Ruokokoski, E., Kandel, S., M¨ ott¨ onen, M. & Hall, D. Observation of dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field. Nature 505, 657–660 (2014)

2014
[55]

Lax, M., Louisell, W. H. & McKnight, W. B. From maxwell to paraxial wave optics. Physical Review A11, 1365 (1975)

1975
[56]

Y., Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F

Bliokh, K. Y., Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. J., Nori, F. & Za- yats, A. V. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nature Pho- tonics 9, 796–808 (2015)

2015
[57]

& Leuchs, G

Aiello, A., Banzer, P., Neugebauer, M. & Leuchs, G. From transverse angular momentum to photonic wheels. Nature Photonics 9, 789–795 (2015)

2015
[58]

Gao, S. et al. Paraxial skyrmionic beams. Physical Re- view A 102, 053513 (2020)

2020
[59]

Shen, Y., Mart ´ ınez, E. C. & Rosales-Guzm´ an, C. Gener- ation of optical skyrmions with tunable topological tex- tures. ACS Photonics 9, 296–303 (2022)

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lin, Z.-K. et al. Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid-state lattices. Nature Re- views Physics 5, 483–495 (2023)

work page 2023

[2] [2]

Haldane, F. D. M. Nobel lecture: Topological quantum matter. Reviews of Modern Physics89, 040502 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [3]

A., Felser, C

Bernevig, B. A., Felser, C. & Beidenkopf, H. Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials. Nature 603, 41–51 (2022)

2022

[4] [4]

Han, L. et al. High-density switchable skyrmion-like po- lar nanodomains integrated on silicon. Nature 603, 63–67 (2022)

2022

[5] [5]

Chen, S. et al. All-electrical skyrmionic magnetic tunnel junction. Nature 627, 522–527 (2024)

2024

[6] [6]

& Cros, V

Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1–15 (2017)

2017

[7] [7]

& Zheludev, N

Papasimakis, N., Fedotov, V., Savinov, V., Raybould, T. & Zheludev, N. Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space. Nature Materials 15, 263–271 (2016)

work page 2016

[8] [8]

& Shen, Y

Wan, Z., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Fu, X. & Shen, Y. Ultra- degree-of-freedom structured light for ultracapacity in- formation carriers. ACS Photonics10, 2149–2164 (2023)

2023