Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Evolution of the Accretion Disk and Corona During the Outburst of the Neutron Star Transient MAXI J1807+132

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read During MAXI J1807+132's 2023 outburst, the X-ray corona contracted as the accretion disk's inner edge moved inward.

desk verdict Solid, well-executed NICER analysis of one more atoll transient; the headline frequency-radius correlation needs a controlling test for luminosity before you lean on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08171 v1 pith:SG536PMS submitted 2024-12-11 astro-ph.HE

Sandeep K. Rout , Teo Munoz-Darias , Jeroen Homan , Montserrat Armas Padilla , David M. Russell , Kevin Alabarta , Payaswini Saikia This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords NeutronstarLow-massX-raybinaryAccretiondiskCoronatimingSpectralstatetransitionsAtollsourceMAXIJ1807+132
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MAXI J1807+132 is a neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary whose 2023 outburst was caught by NICER from first detection through a bright reflare. The paper tries to establish how the inner accretion disk and the hot corona change geometry as the source moves through hard, intermediate, and soft states. Its central result is that the characteristic frequency of the X-ray variability and the spectroscopically inferred inner disk radius move together: across the hard and intermediate states they are anti-correlated with Spearman coefficient -0.87, indicating that the corona contracts as the disk's inner edge moves inward. If correct, this links two independently measured quantities and turns the break frequency into a probe of disk truncation in neutron star transients.

What carries the argument

The two load-bearing observables are independently calibrated: the inner disk radius from the diskbb normalization (with the color-to-effective-temperature correction $\kappa=1.7$ and the zero-torque boundary correction $\zeta=0.4$) and the characteristic frequency $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$ of the band-limited noise (broadband variability that cuts off at high frequencies), obtained by fitting a zero-centroid Lorentzian to each power spectrum. $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$ is the Fourier frequency at which the broadband noise dissipates maximum power and traces the break frequency. The argument runs through the Spearman correlation between these two quantities ($\rho = -0.87$, $p \approx 5\times10^{-9}$), interpreted through a fluctuation-propagation picture in which the low-frequency break tracks the transition radius of the accretion flow; a smaller $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ therefore means a more compact corona.

What would settle it

Measure the inner disk radius independently during the same outburst---for example with a relativistic reflection fit to the Fe K$\alpha$ line profile or, if pulsations are found, with timing of the magnetospheric radius---and check whether it really shrinks by about a factor of 40 while the $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$--$R_{\mathrm{in}}$ correlation holds; a reflection-based radius that stays constant, or a correlation that disappears when the diskbb normalization is replaced, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using NICER data covering MJD 60132--60162, the authors decompose each spectrum into a multicolor disk blackbody (diskbb), a single-temperature boundary-layer blackbody, and a Comptonized power law (nthComp). The disk normalization, converted to a physical inner radius $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ with assumed distance (1--5 kpc), inclination (30--60 deg), and correction factors $\kappa = 1.7$ and $\zeta = 0.4$, shows the disk truncated far out in the hard state, plunging inward by roughly a factor of 40 within three days, then sitting at a nearly constant last stable orbit through the intermediate, soft, and reflare states. The power spectra are band-limited noise whose characteristic frequency $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$ increases as the disk moves in; the Spearman correlation between $\nu_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ is $-0.87$ ($p \approx 5\times10^{-9}$). The paper interprets this as the corona filling the region between the neutron star and the truncated disk and contracting as the disk approaches, with a brief outward disk excursion and coronal expansion during a hard-state dip before the final decay.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on converting the fitted brightness of the disk component into a physical inner disk radius using assumed values for distance and viewing angle and fixed correction factors; if that conversion does not trace the true truncation radius, the frequency-radius correlation and the magnetic-field estimate lose their quantitative grounding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The break frequency of the band-limited noise can serve as a distance-independent proxy for the inner disk radius in atoll neutron-star transients.
  • Because the disk reaches a roughly constant last stable orbit in the intermediate and soft states, the measured radius can be combined with the magnetospheric-radius relation to bracket the neutron star's magnetic field strength (about $10^8$ G at 1 kpc and $10^{10}$ G at 5 kpc).
  • The brief hard excursion around MJD 60147, when the disk recedes and the boundary layer becomes unconstrained, shows that the corona's size follows the disk truncation radius rather than luminosity alone.
  • The reflare after the main outburst, with about 10 percent rms but very low hardness, shows that a soft-color state can still host strong variability and a sizable Comptonized component.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the anti-correlation between break frequency and inner radius holds across many atoll sources, the break frequency could be used to compare disk truncation between objects without needing distance or inclination, a test that existing archival X-ray data could carry out.
  • Beyond the paper: the reflare's low hardness but roughly 10 percent rms may point to variable absorption or a clumpy outflow rather than a fundamentally different accretion state; a coordinated X-ray and optical campaign during a future reflare could distinguish these.
  • Beyond the paper: the same analysis applied to a black hole transient observed with NICER could test whether corona-shrinking with disk inward motion is a general accretion phenomenon or something particular to neutron stars with a hard surface and magnetic field.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. MAXI J1807+132 is a neutron star low-mass X-ray binary that underwent a rapid rise and full spectral state transition in 2023. The paper presents NICER spectral and timing analyses of this outburst, fitting the spectra with TBfeo*(bbodyrad+diskbb+nthComp) and the power spectra with a single Lorentzian. The authors find that the source moves from a hard to a soft state through an intermediate state, shows hysteresis in the hardness–intensity and rms–intensity diagrams, and that the disk inner radius (derived from the diskbb normalization) decreases by a factor of 40 over a few days, reaching a stable value that they identify with the last stable orbit. They report a strong anti-correlation (Spearman ρ = −0.87, p ≈ 5 × 10−9) between the characteristic frequency of the band-limited noise and the disk inner radius, which they interpret as a shrinking corona. They also estimate the magnetic field strength and a lower limit on the spin period under the assumption that the disk is truncated by the magnetosphere.

Significance. The paper provides a valuable, well-sampled view of a neutron star transient during a full outburst, and the analysis is careful in several respects: the hydrogen column density is tied across all observations, two background models are used for consistency checks, and background-dominated epochs are excluded from the timing analysis. The empirical correlation between a timing frequency and a spectral radius is based on standard, publicly available tools and, if physically interpreted as a shrinking corona, would be an interesting addition to the sparse literature on disk–corona evolution in neutron star systems. However, the central interpretation is contingent on the correlation not being an artifact of a common dependence on accretion rate, and on the diskbb normalization in the hard state truly tracing the truncation radius. The magnetic field estimate also requires a clearer physical justification. These issues are addressed in the major comments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Figure 8] The reported Spearman correlation of −0.87 between the characteristic frequency and the disk inner radius is the central evidence for the claim that the corona shrinks as the disk moves inward. Because both quantities are likely to depend on the accretion rate—the break frequency in LMXBs is known to scale with luminosity (Wijnands & van der Klis 1999), and the diskbb normalization is directly related to the disk flux—this correlation could reflect a common dependence on count rate rather than a causal disk–corona coupling. The manuscript does not test for this: no partial correlation controlling for count rate or unabsorbed flux is given, nor is the correlation shown in flux bins. Without such a control, the physical interpretation is not uniquely supported. I request that the authors add a partial Spearman correlation or equivalent analysis, or at minimum discuss why the observed correlation cannot be explained by the shared luminosity trend.
  2. [Section 3.1.2 and Section 4] In the hard states that contribute most to the correlation, the boundary-layer component is not required by the spectral fits. The paper argues that the single thermal component modeled with diskbb is the disk, based on a statistically preferred fit and consistency with the overall evolution, but it does not demonstrate that the diskbb normalization is an unambiguous tracer of the truncation radius in those states. If the thermal component is significantly contaminated by, or actually represents, boundary-layer emission, then the inferred radius evolution—and therefore the frequency–radius correlation that forms the paper's main claim—would lose its physical grounding. A quantitative model comparison (e.g., fitting the hard-state spectra with a single absorbed blackbody as well as diskbb, and checking which is consistent with the expected disk temperature–radius relation) would substantially strengthen the argument.
  3. [Section 4, magnetic field estimate] The magnetic field estimate appears to use the 'last stable orbit' radius—the minimum value of the disk inner radius during the soft state—as the Alfvén radius in the magnetospheric truncation formula. In the soft state the disk is expected to be at the ISCO rather than truncated by the magnetic field; if the magnetosphere is inside the ISCO, the formula does not apply. The paper does not state explicitly which R_in was used in the B calculation, and the resulting range (0.8 × 10^8 to 4.3 × 10^10 G) spans two orders of magnitude, with the high end inconsistent with typical atoll sources. The authors should clarify the choice of R_in, justify the magnetospheric assumption in the context of the soft-state geometry, or remove this estimate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1.1] There is a typo in 'the 1 − 10 keV range range' which should read 'range'.
  2. [Section 3.1.2] The derived disk and boundary-layer temperatures (Tin ≈ 0.03–0.11 keV, kT ≈ 0.15–0.25 keV) are much lower than those typically observed in neutron star LMXBs. The paper notes this but does not discuss whether such low temperatures are physically expected or what they imply for the reliability of the thermal component decomposition; a brief comment would be helpful.
  3. [Section 4] The phrase 'two independently measured quantities' is misleading, since the characteristic frequency and the diskbb normalization are derived from the same observations and both evolve with the source state, even though they come from different analysis products. Rephrasing to something like 'measured from independent analysis products' would be more precise.
  4. [Section 4] The jet detections cited as 'Rout et al. 2025, in preparation' and 'Rout et al. 2024, in preparation' are not verifiable by the reader; please either describe the evidence in the text or provide a published reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the ν_max–R_in correlation is an empirical relation between separately fitted quantities; no claim reduces by construction.

full rationale

The paper's main result is an empirical Spearman correlation (r = -0.87, p ~ 5e-9) between the characteristic frequency of a band-limited Lorentzian fitted to power spectra and an inner-disk radius obtained from the diskbb normalization. Nothing in the fitting equations makes ν_max a function of N_diskbb or vice versa: ν_max comes from the Lorentzian width/centroid in the timing analysis, while R_in is a monotone transform of the spectral normalization with external constants (κ, ζ, distance, inclination). The magnetic-field and spin-period estimates apply standard literature relations (Ibragimov & Poutanen 2009; Cackett et al. 2009; Degenaar et al. 2017) to fitted spectral quantities, which is an inference, not a prediction that is forced by construction. The in-preparation self-citations (Rout et al. 2024, 2025) about jet emission appear only in the speculative coronal-geometry discussion and are not load-bearing for the central correlation; they are an unverifiable-reference concern rather than a circular step. The skeptic's common-luminosity confound is a legitimate physical/statistical alternative, but it does not make the correlation definitional, since a correlation mediated by a common driver is still not an identity between the two measured quantities. I find no circular reduction in the paper's derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard X-ray spectral and timing models, assumed source distance/inclination, and a set of correction factors from the literature. The paper's physical radius estimates and magnetic field inference are all model-dependent, though the empirical correlations (hysteresis, frequency-radius) are direct observables.

free parameters (10)
  • NH (hydrogen column density) = 2.616e21 cm^-2
    Tied across all spectra; absorbs soft X-rays and affects thermal component normalizations.
  • O abundance = 0.800 solar
    Left free to fix soft X-ray residuals; affects the model continuum shape.
  • Fe abundance = upper limit 0.13 solar
    Could not be constrained; fixed at best-fit value in subsequent fits.
  • Per-observation diskbb normalization = 6.05e8 down to 5e5
    Directly converted into the inner disk radius, the paper's central physical quantity.
  • Per-observation bbodyrad normalization = 6.49e3 down to 3.76e2
    Converted into the boundary layer radius; affects distance discussion.
  • Photon index Gamma = ~2 (main outburst), 1.3-1.8 (reflare)
    Governs the power-law (coronal) flux fraction.
  • Distance = 1-5 kpc (range)
    Chosen from prior optical/X-ray correlation; directly scales the radii.
  • Inclination = 30-60 deg (range)
    Chosen as extreme cases; affects diskbb radius.
  • Color correction kappa = 1.7
    From Shimura & Takahara (1995), used to convert color temperature to effective temperature.
  • Torque correction zeta = 0.4
    From Kubota et al. (1998), adjusts flux for non-zero inner torque.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The X-ray spectrum of the neutron star is described by TBfeo*(bbodyrad+diskbb+nthComp).
    Standard decomposition for NS LMXBs; the paper uses it throughout Section 3.1.2.
  • domain assumption The diskbb normalization maps to the inner disk radius via R_in = kappa^2 * zeta * (norm/D10)^0.5 * ... (standard formula).
    The paper applies color and torque corrections to infer radii in Section 4.
  • domain assumption The break frequency of the band-limited noise traces the outer radius of the corona or transition radius.
    Used to interpret the frequency-radius correlation in Section 4; based on propagation models (Churazov et al. 2001; Marcel et al. 2018).
  • domain assumption The disk halts at the magnetospheric (Alfven) radius when estimating the magnetic field.
    Used with the Ibragimov & Poutanen (2009) relation in Section 4.
  • domain assumption The source distance lies between 1 and 5 kpc.
    Adopted from Jimenez-Ibarra et al. (2019); all radius and luminosity estimates depend on it.
  • domain assumption Distance-luminosity relationships and Eddington fraction thresholds for state transitions apply to this source.
    Used to argue against small distance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of the Accretion Disk and Corona During the Outburst of the Neutron Star Transient MAXI J1807+132." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SG536PMS

@misc{pith2026241208171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of the Accretion Disk and Corona During the Outburst of the Neutron Star Transient MAXI J1807+132},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SG536PMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08171}
}
read the original abstract

Low-mass X-ray binaries with a neutron star as the primary object show a complex array of phenomenology during outbursts. The observed variability in X-ray emission primarily arises from changes in the innermost regions of the accretion disk, neutron star surface, and corona. In this work, we present the results of a comprehensive X-ray spectral and timing analysis of the neutron star transient MAXI J1807+132 during its 2023 outburst using data from the NICER observatory. The outburst is marked by a very rapid rise in the count rate by about a factor of 20 in a day. The source undergoes full state transitions and displays hysteresis effect in the hardness and rms intensity diagrams. Spectral analysis with a three-component model is consistent with disk truncation during the hard states and reaching the last stable orbit during the intermediate and soft states. We discuss the different values of the last stable radius in the context of possible distance of the source and magnetic field strength. The characteristic frequencies throughout the hard and intermediate states are found to be strongly correlated with the inner radius of the disk. Together with the spectral and fast variability properties, we attempt to trace the evolution of the size of the corona along the outburst. Following the main outburst, the source undergoes a high amplitude reflare wherein it shows a complex behavior with relatively high variability (10 %), but low hardness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08171 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The NICER lightcurve of MAXI J1807+132 containing all observations in the 1 − 10 keV range. The points marked with triangles represent upper limits for non￾detections, while all the rest are significant detections. The different states along the outburst are marked by different colors. 2020). Rapid variability, produced from the hard X-ray emitting region close to the compact object, is primarily studied through pow… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Hardness-intensity diagram (HID) of MAXI J1807+132 during the 2023 outburst. The hardness ratio is defined as the ratio of count rates in 2 − 10 keV to 0.5 − 2 keV bands, and the total count rate is in the 0.5 − 10 keV range. Right: Color-color diagram (CCD) of the source during the same period. The source is in the island branch during the beginning and end of the outburst, and in the banana branch during res… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Hardness-rms diagram (HRD) of MAXI J1807+132 during the 2023 outburst. The hardness ratio is the same as that defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: A typical time-averaged spectrum with the individual model components observed on MJD 60138.68 (ObsId 6634010104). The dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed lines represent the disk, BL, and corona respectively. Right: Power spectrum of the same observation fitted by a …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal evolution of the best-fitting model parameters for all the X-ray spectra. The top two panels show the temperature and normalization of the two thermal components - disk and BL. The third panel depicts the evolution of the photon index and normalization of the …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of the fluxes of the individual model components (left), and the fraction of thermal and comptonization flux (right). soft state through an intermediate state, and then back to the hard state at a lower luminosity (Mu˜noz-Darias et al. 2014, ; [PITH_FUL…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Values of the BL radius (left) and inner-disk radius (right) obtained from the best-fitting normalization of the respective thermal components. while the latter is just in the ballpark, although still a factor of a few higher (Cackett et al. 2010; Miller et al. 2011; L…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The correlation between the characteristic fre￾quency of the power spectra with the disk inner radius from the beginning until the end of the excursion in the hard state. of the power spectrum (Churazov et al. 2001; Kawamura et al. 2022). The characteristic frequency o…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    2020, , 497, 3896, 10.1093/mnras/staa2168

    Alabarta , K., Altamirano , D., M \'e ndez , M., et al. 2020, , 497, 3896, 10.1093/mnras/staa2168

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2168 2020

  5. [5]

    C., Altamirano , D., Jaisawal , G

    Albayati , A. C., Altamirano , D., Jaisawal , G. K., et al. 2021, , 501, 261, 10.1093/mnras/staa3657

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3657 2021

  6. [6]

    2017, , 467, 290, 10.1093/mnras/stx020

    Armas Padilla , M., Ueda , Y., Hori , T., Shidatsu , M., & Mu \ n oz-Darias , T. 2017, , 467, 290, 10.1093/mnras/stx020

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx020 2017

  7. [7]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  8. [8]

    2000, , 131, 571, 10.1086/317374

    Asai , K., Dotani , T., Nagase , F., & Mitsuda , K. 2000, , 131, 571, 10.1086/317374

    doi:10.1086/317374 2000

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    2013, , 773, 117, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/117

    Asai , K., Matsuoka , M., Mihara , T., et al. 2013, , 773, 117, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/117

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics

    Bahramian , A., & Degenaar , N. 2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics. Edited by Cosimo Bambi and Andrea Santangelo, 120, 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    2024, , 529, 4311, 10.1093/mnras/stae541

    Banerjee , S., & Homan , J. 2024, , 529, 4311, 10.1093/mnras/stae541

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    1990, , 230, 103

    Belloni , T., & Hasinger , G. 1990, , 230, 103

    1990

  5. [13]

    2002, , 572, 392, 10.1086/340290

    Belloni , T., Psaltis , D., & van der Klis , M. 2002, , 572, 392, 10.1086/340290

    2002 doi

  6. [14]

    M., & Motta , S

    Belloni , T. M., & Motta , S. E. 2016, Transient Black Hole Binaries , ed. C. Bambi , Vol. 440 (Springer), 61, 10.1007/978-3-662-52859-4_2

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Beloborodov , A. M. 1999, , 510, L123, 10.1086/311810

    1999 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Altamirano , D., Patruno , A., et al

    Cackett , E. M., Altamirano , D., Patruno , A., et al. 2009, , 694, L21, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L21

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Miller , J

    Cackett , E. M., Miller , J. M., Ballantyne , D. R., et al. 2010, , 720, 205, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/205

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    2001, , 321, 759, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04056.x

    Churazov , E., Gilfanov , M., & Revnivtsev , M. 2001, , 321, 759, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04056.x

    2001

  11. [20]

    M., et al

    Degenaar , N., Pinto , C., Miller , J. M., et al. 2017, , 464, 398, 10.1093/mnras/stw2355

    2017 doi

  12. [21]

    Di Salvo , T., M \'e ndez , M., van der Klis , M., Ford , E., & Robba , N. R. 2001, , 546, 1107, 10.1086/318278

    2001 doi

  13. [22]

    2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (eds

    Di Salvo , T., Papitto , A., Marino , A., Iaria , R., & Burderi , L. 2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (eds. C. Bambi, 147, 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_103-1

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    2007, , 15, 1, 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    Done , C., Gierli \'n ski , M., & Kubota , A. 2007, , 15, 1, 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    2007 doi

  15. [24]

    C., Rees , M

    Fabian , A. C., Rees , M. J., Stella , L., & White , N. E. 1989, , 238, 729, 10.1093/mnras/238.3.729

    1989 doi

  16. [25]

    2016, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, ed

    Fender , R., & Mu \ n oz-Darias , T. 2016, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, ed. F. Haardt , V. Gorini , U. Moschella , A. Treves , & M. Colpi , Vol. 905, 65, 10.1007/978-3-319-19416-5_3

    2016 doi

  17. [26]

    P., Belloni , T

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004, , 355, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x

    2004

  18. [27]

    Frank , J., King , A., & Raine , D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK )

    2002

  19. [28]

    K., Muno , M

    Galloway , D. K., Muno , M. P., Hartman , J. M., Psaltis , D., & Chakrabarty , D. 2008, , 179, 360, 10.1086/592044

    2008 doi

  20. [29]

    K., in't Zand , J., Chenevez , J., et al

    Galloway , D. K., in't Zand , J., Chenevez , J., et al. 2020, , 249, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9f2e

    2020 doi

  21. [30]

    K., Ghosh , H., & Chakrabarti , S

    Garain , S. K., Ghosh , H., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 2014, , 437, 1329, 10.1093/mnras/stt1969

    2014 doi

  22. [31]

    2022, , 513, 4196, 10.1093/mnras/stac1202

    Garc \' a , F., Karpouzas , K., M \'e ndez , M., et al. 2022, , 513, 4196, 10.1093/mnras/stac1202

    2022 doi

  23. [32]

    C., Arzoumanian , Z., & Okajima , T

    Gendreau , K. C., Arzoumanian , Z., & Okajima , T. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8443, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 844313, 10.1117/12.926396

    2012 doi

  24. [33]

    R., & Sunyaev , R

    Gilfanov , M. R., & Sunyaev , R. A. 2014, Physics Uspekhi, 57, 377, 10.3367/UFNe.0184.201404e.0409

    2014

  25. [34]

    1989, , 225, 79

    Hasinger , G., & van der Klis , M. 1989, , 225, 79

    1989

  26. [35]

    2005, , 300, 107, 10.1007/s10509-005-1197-4

    Homan , J., & Belloni , T. 2005, , 300, 107, 10.1007/s10509-005-1197-4

    2005 doi

  27. [36]

    2001, , 132, 377, 10.1086/318954

    Homan , J., Wijnands , R., van der Klis , M., et al. 2001, , 132, 377, 10.1086/318954

    2001 doi

  28. [37]

    2009, , 400, 492, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15477.x

    Ibragimov , A., & Poutanen , J. 2009, , 400, 492, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15477.x

    2009

  29. [38]

    M., & Sanna , A

    Illiano , G., Papitto , A., Ambrosino , F., Zanon , A. M., & Sanna , A. 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, 16125, 1

    2023

  30. [40]

    Ingram , A., Done , C., & Fragile , P. C. 2009, , 397, L101, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x

    2009

  31. [41]

    R., & Motta , S

    Ingram , A. R., & Motta , S. E. 2019, , 85, 101524, 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101524

    2019

  32. [42]

    A., & Sunyaev , R

    Inogamov , N. A., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1999, Astronomy Letters, 25, 269, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9904333

    1999 doi arXiv

  33. [43]

    2019, , 484, 2078, 10.1093/mnras/sty3457

    Jim \'e nez-Ibarra , F., Mu \ n oz-Darias , T., Armas Padilla , M., et al. 2019, , 484, 2078, 10.1093/mnras/sty3457

    2019 doi

  34. [44]

    M., et al

    Karpouzas , K., M \'e ndez , M., Ribeiro , E. M., et al. 2020, , 492, 1399, 10.1093/mnras/stz3502

    2020 doi

  35. [45]

    2022, , 511, 536, 10.1093/mnras/stac045

    Kawamura , T., Axelsson , M., Done , C., & Takahashi , T. 2022, , 511, 536, 10.1093/mnras/stac045

    2022 doi

  36. [46]

    2007, , 671, 1990, 10.1086/522954

    Klu \'z niak , W., & Rappaport , S. 2007, , 671, 1990, 10.1086/522954

    2007 doi

  37. [47]

    1998, , 50, 667, 10.1093/pasj/50.6.667

    Kubota , A., Tanaka , Y., Makishima , K., et al. 1998, , 50, 667, 10.1093/pasj/50.6.667

    1998 doi

  38. [48]

    K., & Miller , M

    Lamb , F. K., & Miller , M. C. 2001, , 554, 1210, 10.1086/323148

    2001 doi

  39. [49]

    A., & Homan , J

    Lin , D., Remillard , R. A., & Homan , J. 2007, , 667, 1073, 10.1086/521181

    2007 doi

  40. [50]

    2009, , 696, 1257, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1257

    ---. 2009, , 696, 1257, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1257

    2009 doi

  41. [51]

    M., & Lovelace , R

    Long , M., Romanova , M. M., & Lovelace , R. V. E. 2005, , 634, 1214, 10.1086/497000

    2005 doi

  42. [52]

    M., Miller , J

    Ludlam , R. M., Miller , J. M., Barret , D., et al. 2019, , 873, 99, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0414

    2019 doi

  43. [53]

    J., & Coppi , P

    Maccarone , T. J., & Coppi , P. S. 2003, , 338, 189, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06040.x

    2003

  44. [54]

    J., Uttley , P., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R

    Maccarone , T. J., Uttley , P., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R. A. D., & Coppi , P. S. 2011, , 413, 1819, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18273.x

    2011

  45. [55]

    1986, , 308, 635, 10.1086/164534

    Makishima , K., Maejima , Y., Mitsuda , K., et al. 1986, , 308, 635, 10.1086/164534

    1986 doi

  46. [56]

    O., et al

    Marcel , G., Ferreira , J., Petrucci , P. O., et al. 2018, , 615, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732069

    2018 doi

  47. [57]

    2020, , 640, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037539

    Marcel , G., Cangemi , F., Rodriguez , J., et al. 2020, , 640, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037539

    2020 doi

  48. [58]

    2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol

    Markwardt , C., Arzoumanian , Z., Gendreau , K., Hare , J., & Nicer Team . 2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol. 21, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, 105.36

    2024

  49. [59]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 577, 10.1038/s41550-022-01617-y

    M \'e ndez , M., Karpouzas , K., Garc \' a , F., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 577, 10.1038/s41550-022-01617-y

    2022 doi

  50. [60]

    M., Maitra , D., Cackett , E

    Miller , J. M., Maitra , D., Cackett , E. M., Bhattacharyya , S., & Strohmayer , T. E. 2011, , 731, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/731/1/L7

    2011 doi

  51. [61]

    1989, , 41, 97

    Mitsuda , K., Inoue , H., Nakamura , N., & Tanaka , Y. 1989, , 41, 97

    1989

  52. [62]

    1984, , 36, 741

    Mitsuda , K., Inoue , H., Koyama , K., et al. 1984, , 36, 741

    1984

  53. [63]

    P., Motta , S

    Mu \ n oz-Darias , T., Fender , R. P., Motta , S. E., & Belloni , T. M. 2014, , 443, 3270, 10.1093/mnras/stu1334

    2014 doi

  54. [64]

    Mu \ n oz-Darias , T., Motta , S., & Belloni , T. M. 2011, , 410, 679, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17476.x

    2011

  55. [65]

    F., & Kulkarni , A

    Narayan , R., S \"A dowski , A., Penna , R. F., & Kulkarni , A. K. 2012, , 426, 3241, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22002.x

    2012

  56. [66]

    A., Vaughan , B

    Nowak , M. A., Vaughan , B. A., Wilms , J., Dove , J. B., & Begelman , M. C. 1999, , 510, 874, 10.1086/306610

    1999 doi

  57. [67]

    2010, , 722, 909, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/909

    Patruno , A. 2010, , 722, 909, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/909

    2010 doi

  58. [68]

    1999, , 521, 332, 10.1086/307525

    Psaltis , D., & Chakrabarty , D. 1999, , 521, 332, 10.1086/307525

    1999 doi

  59. [69]

    A., & McClintock , J

    Remillard , R. A., & McClintock , J. E. 2006, , 44, 49, 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532

    2006 arXiv

  60. [70]

    A., Loewenstein , M., Steiner , J

    Remillard , R. A., Loewenstein , M., Steiner , J. F., et al. 2022, , 163, 130, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4ae6

    2022 doi

  61. [71]

    M., Alabarta , K., et al

    Saikia , P., Russell , D. M., Alabarta , K., et al. 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, 16119, 1

    2023

  62. [72]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Shakura , N. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1988, Advances in Space Research, 8, 135, 10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1

    1988 doi

  63. [73]

    2017, , 850, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f0

    Shidatsu , M., Tachibana , Y., Yoshii , T., et al. 2017, , 850, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f0

    2017 doi

  64. [74]

    1995, , 445, 780, 10.1086/175740

    Shimura , T., & Takahara , F. 1995, , 445, 780, 10.1086/175740

    1995 doi

  65. [75]

    E., Zhang , W., Swank , J

    Strohmayer , T. E., Zhang , W., Swank , J. H., et al. 1996, , 469, L9, 10.1086/310261

    1996 doi

  66. [76]

    V., Koldoba , A

    Ustyugova , G. V., Koldoba , A. V., Romanova , M. M., & Lovelace , R. V. E. 2006, , 646, 304, 10.1086/503379

    2006 doi

  67. [77]

    1989, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol

    van der Klis , M. 1989, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 262, Timing Neutron Stars, ed. H. \"O gelman & E. P. J. van den Heuvel , 27

    1989

  68. [78]

    1997, in Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy II, ed

    van der Klis , M. 1997, in Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy II, ed. G. J. Babu & E. D. Feigelson , 321. astro-ph/9704273

    1997 arXiv

  69. [79]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Vol

    van der Klis , M. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Vol. 39, 39--112

    2006

  70. [80]

    1999, , 514, 939, 10.1086/306993

    Wijnands , R., & van der Klis , M. 1999, , 514, 939, 10.1086/306993

    1999 doi

  71. [81]

    2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  72. [82]

    A., Johnson , W

    Zdziarski , A. A., Johnson , W. N., & Magdziarz , P. 1996, , 283, 193, 10.1093/mnras/283.1.193

    1996 doi

  73. [83]

    T., Done , C., & Smith , D

    \.Z ycki , P. T., Done , C., & Smith , D. A. 1999, , 309, 561, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02885.x

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.