Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Thermodynamics and DC conductivity of 2D anisotropic fluids from axion holography

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a charged 2+1-dimensional fluid with a single linear axion remains thermodynamically stable at all studied charge and anisotropy, while its DC conductivity along the broken direction vanishes at large anisotropy and…

desk verdict Solid single-axion holography with a clean stability analysis and an interesting MIT, but the large-anisotropy story rests on a conjecture and Eq. (3.51) has a typo. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08538 v2 pith:4WGP5LU7 submitted 2024-12-11 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-ph

Alfonso Ballon-Bayona , Jonathan P. Shock , Dimitrios Zoakos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elhep-ph
keywords axionholographyanisotropicconformalfluidDCconductivitymetal-insulatortransitiondimensionalreductionAdS4blackbranemomentumrelaxationthermodynamicstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a slice of gauge-gravity duality with a single linear axion field can describe a 2+1-dimensional quantum fluid with translations broken along one spatial direction. The authors claim the fluid's thermodynamics remain those of a conformal fluid and remain stable no matter how strong the charge density or anisotropy becomes. The main physical payoff is transport: the DC conductivity along the broken direction is finite, falls to zero as the anisotropy grows, and switches from metallic to insulating behavior at a critical anisotropy that grows with charge density. If correct, this shows that anisotropy alone, without disorder or an extra coupling between the axion and the gauge field, can drive a metal-insulator transition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the single linear axion $\chi = a x$ in the Einstein-Maxwell-Axion action, which breaks translations along $x$ while leaving the gravitational background homogeneous; the black brane ansatz has metric $ds^2 = -U(r) dt^2 + dr^2/U(r) + e^{2V(r)} dx^2 + e^{2W(r)} dy^2$ and gauge field $f(r) dt$. The axion slope $a$ acts as an intensive thermodynamic variable conjugate to an anisotropisation density $\Phi$, and the transport argument runs on the horizon formula $\sigma_{xx} = e^{W-V}|_{r_h} + 4Q^2/(a^2 e^{W+V}|_{r_h})$ for the DC conductivity along $x$. At large anisotropy, the conjectured endpoint is the geometry $AdS_3 \times \mathbb{R}$ of appendix B, which is the mechanism by which the fluid reduces from a 2+1 CFT to a 1+1 CFT and the conductivity along $x$ goes to zero.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to compute subleading corrections in $1/\hat{a}$ from the full numerical solution and test whether the entropy slope approaches $s_{\infty,1} = 16\sigma\pi^2/(3\sqrt{6})$ and the conductivity $\sigma_{xx}$ falls exactly as predicted; if no interpolation from an $AdS_4$ boundary to the $AdS_3 \times \mathbb{R}$ infrared geometry exists with those coefficients, the dimensional-reduction claim loses its quantitative support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the charged $AdS_4$ black brane with a single linear axion $\chi = a x$ is the holographic dual of a 2+1-dimensional conformal fluid that is thermodynamically stable for every value of charge and anisotropy studied, with the stability criteria $\chi_\Phi > 0$, $\chi_\mu > 0$, and $C_{Q,\Phi} > 0$ verified numerically. The paper further claims that the DC conductivity along the broken $x$ direction, expressed at the horizon as $\sigma_{xx} = w_{h,0}/v_{h,0} + 4Q^2/(a^2 w_{h,0} v_{h,0})$, vanishes in the large-anisotropy limit because the system dimensionally reduces to a 1+1 CFT, and that the conductivity changes from metallic to insulating at a critical anisotropy $\hat{a}_c$ that depends on the dimensionless charge $\hat{Q}$.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative large-anisotropy results rest on the conjecture that the exact zero-charge solution $AdS_3 \times \mathbb{R}$ is the deep-infrared endpoint of the full numerical solution, even though the paper notes that it is not clear how to impose UV boundary conditions on that analytic solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, a minimal homogeneous holographic model without disorder produces a finite DC conductivity and a metal-insulator transition purely from anisotropy.
  • The DC conductivity along the broken direction vanishes as $\hat{a} \to \infty$, so the fluid becomes a perfect insulator in that direction while remaining a perfect conductor along $y$.
  • The thermodynamic stability criteria $\chi_\Phi > 0$, $\chi_\mu > 0$, and $C_{Q,\Phi} > 0$ hold for all studied charge and anisotropy, so the anisotropic fluid is not destabilised by strong deformation.
  • The split in the speeds of sound, $c_{s,x}^2 \to 0$ and $c_{s,y}^2 \to 1$, provides a sharp signature of the RG flow from a 2+1 CFT to a 1+1 CFT.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the large-anisotropy extrapolation is confirmed, the same single-axion mechanism should produce a metal-insulator transition in the two-axion model with unequal slopes, with a finite, direction-dependent conductivity matrix instead of an infinite component.
  • Beyond the paper: the monotonic increase of the critical anisotropy with charge density suggests that density is a control knob for the transition, which could be tested in a holographic lattice or an ultracold atomic realisation.
  • Beyond the paper: the extreme transport asymmetry at large anisotropy implies strongly directional electrical and thermal response, so measurements of directional resistivity could distinguish this mechanism from disorder-driven transitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies Einstein-Maxwell-axion theory in AdS4 with a single linear axion χ = a x, constructing a holographic dual of a 2+1-dimensional anisotropic conformal fluid at finite charge density. It derives the fluid thermodynamics from the holographically renormalised action, obtains exact identities relating energy, pressures, entropy, chemical potential and anisotropisation density, and computes the DC conductivity along the broken direction. The authors supplement an analytic perturbative solution for small anisotropy with a full numerical solution for generic parameters. They report that the thermodynamic stability criteria are satisfied, that the entropy grows linearly in the anisotropy at large anisotropy with a slope fixed by a Q=0 AdS3 solution, that the DC conductivity vanishes in that limit as a consequence of dimensional reduction, and that the model exhibits an anisotropy-driven metal-insulator transition.

Significance. If fully established, the model is a minimal holographic realisation of an anisotropy-driven metal-insulator transition and of dimensional reduction from a 2+1-dimensional CFT to a 1+1-dimensional CFT. The paper contains several solid internal checks: the trace condition (3.32), the exact pressure identity (3.46), the agreement between entropy from the on-shell action and from the Bekenstein-Hawking area, and the reduction of the DC formula (C.15) to known isotropic results. The perturbative and numerical solutions agree in the small-anisotropy regime, and the large-anisotropy entropy slope is obtained analytically from the exact Q=0 solution (B.4), not fitted. The main significance is conditional, however, because the most novel large-anisotropy statements rely on an unproven IR endpoint conjecture.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2 and Appendix B] The large-anisotropy claims—Eq. (4.6), the c_{s,y}^2→1 flow, and the abstract's statement that the DC conductivity vanishes 'as a consequence of dimensionality reduction'—rest on identifying the exact Q=0 solution (B.4) as the deep-IR endpoint of the full charged anisotropic brane. This identification is not derived: (B.4) is AdS3×R rather than asymptotically AdS4, and Appendix B explicitly says 'it is not clear how to impose the boundary conditions in the UV' for the expansion around it. The numerical agreement of the entropy slope is suggestive but does not exclude other near-horizon geometries with the same scaling. I ask for a matched asymptotic expansion, or an independent argument that the full solution approaches (B.4) on a growing radial window; otherwise these central statements should be explicitly labelled as conjectural, and the vanishing of σxx should be derived directly from the horizon formula (3.49).
  2. [§4.5 and Conclusions] The statement that the fluid is thermodynamically stable 'for any value of the anisotropy' extrapolates beyond the presented evidence. The stability criteria (2.29) are verified analytically only in the small-â, small-ˆQ regime (Appendix A.2) and numerically over finite ranges (figures 6 and 7, with â up to about 10 or 50). Since the large-â endpoint conjecture of Appendix B is not available as a proof, the unbounded claim is unsupported. Please either extend the scan and provide an asymptotic stability argument, or restrict the claim to the range actually studied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Appendix B] The text says 'those two solutions do not have an AdS5 nature'; since the bulk is four-dimensional, this should read 'AdS4 nature'.
  2. [Throughout] There are several small typos: 'Harnoll-Kovtun' (p. 33), 'therm' (p. 17), 'stess tensor' (p. 30), and 'metalic' (p. 28) should be corrected.
  3. [§2 and §3] The same symbol V is used for the field-theory volume in §2 and for a metric function in §3. This is confusing; please use a different symbol or explicitly note the clash.
  4. [Figure 8] The three curves do not coincide at â=0 as expected from the isotropic limit c_{s,x}^2=1/2. Since the authors attribute this to numerical differentiation, an error estimate or a more accurate computation would make the comparison quantitative.
  5. [§4.3] The asymptotic fit f∞,3≈−0.24 is quoted without an error estimate or the fitting range in â; please provide both.
  6. [Appendix C and §3.4] The factor-4 redefinition of the currents, explained in a footnote in Appendix C, is easy to miss; the convention should be stated together with the main DC formula (3.49).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DC conductivity and large-anisotropy entropy slope are derived from independent horizon-data and exact-solution calculations; the large-anisotropy endpoint identification is a stated conjecture, not a fitted or renamed input.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the equations of motion (3.7) follow from the action (3.1); the small-anisotropy perturbative solution (Appendix A) and the full numerical solution (§4.1) are matched to the AdS4 boundary; holographic renormalisation yields F, E and P ((3.27)–(3.31)); thermodynamic identities ((2.15)–(2.20)) then give S, μ, Φ and the stability criteria (2.29), which are verified numerically against the gravity data. The DC conductivity formula (C.15) is the standard horizon formula reproduced from the independent calculations of [14,30]; in the isotropic limits it reduces to the known results, so it is not an input dressed as a prediction. The large-anisotropy entropy slope s∞,1 = 16σπ²/(3√6) is computed from the exact Q=0 solution (B.4), not fitted to the numerical curve, and the numerical entropy and speed-of-sound plots provide independent checks. The weakest point is the identification of (B.4) as the deep-IR endpoint of the full charged anisotropic brane; the paper explicitly labels this a conjecture and states in Appendix B that 'it is not clear how to impose the boundary conditions in the UV'. That is an admitted extrapolation and a genuine rigor/correctness risk for the dimensional-reduction explanation of σxx → 0, but it is not circular: the endpoint solution is not defined in terms of the conductivity or entropy results it is used to explain. Self-citations (notably [28], used for magnetic-enthalpy terminology and stability analogies) are not load-bearing; the stability criteria are derived in §2.3 and validated numerically in this paper, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to exclude alternatives. The central quantitative claims are therefore self-contained against the model's own equations and against external benchmarks, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard holographic tools (renormalized on-shell action, horizon formula for DC transport) plus one acknowledged conjecture (the Q=0 endpoint (B.4) controlling the large-â regime). The only number fitted to output data is the auxiliary large-â coefficient f∞,3 of the free energy. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated; the axion is a standard ingredient and the AdS3 IR geometry is an emergent endpoint, not an invented entity. Model inputs are the action (3.1) with c = 4 and ℓ = 1, plus the ensemble variables Q and a.

free parameters (1)
  • f∞,3 = ≈ -0.24
    Coefficient of the leading â³ term in F̂(â>>1), obtained by polynomial fit to numerical data in §4.3. Presented as an observation, not used as an input to any derivation; auxiliary to the central claims.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality maps the Einstein-Maxwell-Axion bulk to a strongly coupled boundary fluid (gauge-gravity duality).
    Invoked throughout; first stated in §1, used to identify the bulk on-shell action with the boundary Gibbs free energy in §3.3.
  • domain assumption The massless bulk axion χ = a x is dual to a marginal operator of conformal dimension Δ=3, so the deformation preserves conformality of the boundary theory.
    §3.1, citing [30,31]; this makes the boundary fluid conformal for all a and underlies the trace-vanishing result (3.32).
  • domain assumption The homogeneous diagonal ansatz (3.6) (U, V, W, f) with a single linear axion captures the physical class of solutions; uniqueness of the regular solution is not proven.
    §3.1, Eq. (3.6); the ansatz solves the equations of motion, but no no-hair-type uniqueness theorem is given.
  • standard math Thermodynamic stability in the canonical ensemble is equivalent to positivity of χΦ, χµ and CQ,Φ (leading principal minors of the Hessian of the internal energy).
    §2.3, following Landau-Lifshitz [27] and the authors' previous work [28]; the criteria are then checked numerically in §4.4-4.5.
  • domain assumption DC conductivities are obtained from horizon data of regular (infalling) perturbations following [30]; the result (C.15) is adopted with a current normalization chosen so the isotropic large-a limit gives σ→1.
    Appendix C, Eqs. (C.12)-(C.15); the normalization convention is noted in the footnote of that appendix.
  • ad hoc to paper For â >> Q̂ the full numerical solution is approximated in the deep IR by the exact Q=0 solution (B.4) (AdS3 × R), so its entropy slope s∞,1 and conductivity scaling apply to the full model.
    §4.2 and Appendix B; the paper flags this as a conjecture and notes that boundary conditions for (B.4) are unclear, but the large-â entropy and conductivity claims rely on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics and DC conductivity of 2D anisotropic fluids from axion holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4WGP5LU7

@misc{pith2026241208538,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics and DC conductivity of 2D anisotropic fluids from axion holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4WGP5LU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08538}
}
abstract

We investigate a strongly coupled finite-density anisotropic fluid in $2+1$ dimensions dual to an asymptotically AdS black brane that is a solution of Einstein-Maxwell-Axion theory in $3+1$ dimensions. Despite the anisotropy, the fluid thermodynamic properties align with those of a conformal fluid. Moreover, we show that the fluid is stable under the increase of the anisotropy parameter. Additionally, we analyse the DC conductivity of the anisotropic fluid, showing its compatibility with momentum dissipation due to translational symmetry breaking. In the limit of very large anisotropy we find that the DC conductivity vanishes as a consequence of dimensionality reduction. We also find that a metal-insulator transition arises driven by the anisotropy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger, Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas, and S. Sachdev, Holographic Quantum Matter. MIT Press, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Zaanen, Y.-W

    J. Zaanen, Y.-W. Sun, Y. Liu, and K. Schalm, Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    Building a Holographic Superconductor,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, “Building a Holographic Superconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 031601, arXiv:0803.3295 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Holographic Superconductors,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, “Holographic Superconductors,” JHEP 12 (2008) 015, arXiv:0810.1563 [hep-th]. – 39 –

    arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Introduction to Holographic Superconductors,

    G. T. Horowitz, “Introduction to Holographic Superconductors,” Lect. Notes Phys. 828 (2011) 313–347, arXiv:1002.1722 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Colloquium: Hydrodynamics and holography of charge density wave phases,

    M. Baggioli and B. Gout´ eraux, “Colloquium: Hydrodynamics and holography of charge density wave phases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 no. 1, (2023) 011001, arXiv:2203.03298 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Optical Conductivity with Holographic Lattices,

    G. T. Horowitz, J. E. Santos, and D. Tong, “Optical Conductivity with Holographic Lattices,” JHEP 07 (2012) 168, arXiv:1204.0519 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Further Evidence for Lattice-Induced Scaling,

    G. T. Horowitz, J. E. Santos, and D. Tong, “Further Evidence for Lattice-Induced Scaling,” JHEP 11 (2012) 102, arXiv:1209.1098 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    General Relativity and the Cuprates,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, “General Relativity and the Cuprates,” JHEP 06 (2013) 087, arXiv:1302.6586 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The thermoelectric properties of inhomogeneous holographic lattices,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “The thermoelectric properties of inhomogeneous holographic lattices,” JHEP 01 (2015) 035, arXiv:1409.6875 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,

    S. Nakamura, H. Ooguri, and C.-S. Park, “Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 044018, arXiv:0911.0679 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Holographic striped phases,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Holographic striped phases,” JHEP 08 (2011) 140, arXiv:1106.2004 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation,

    T. Andrade and B. Withers, “A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation,” JHEP 05 (2014) 101, arXiv:1311.5157 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Holography without translational symmetry,

    D. Vegh, “Holography without translational symmetry,” arXiv:1301.0537 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Momentum relaxation in holographic massive gravity,

    R. A. Davison, “Momentum relaxation in holographic massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 086003, arXiv:1306.5792 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Universal Resistivity from Holographic Massive Gravity,

    M. Blake and D. Tong, “Universal Resistivity from Holographic Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 10, (2013) 106004, arXiv:1308.4970 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Holographic Lattices Give the Graviton an Effective Mass,

    M. Blake, D. Tong, and D. Vegh, “Holographic Lattices Give the Graviton an Effective Mass,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 no. 7, (2014) 071602, arXiv:1310.3832 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Solid Holography and Massive Gravity,

    L. Alberte, M. Baggioli, A. Khmelnitsky, and O. Pujolas, “Solid Holography and Massive Gravity,” JHEP 02 (2016) 114, arXiv:1510.09089 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Holographic Axion Model: a simple gravitational tool for quantum matter,

    M. Baggioli, K.-Y. Kim, L. Li, and W.-J. Li, “Holographic Axion Model: a simple gravitational tool for quantum matter,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 no. 7, (2021) 270001, arXiv:2101.01892 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hall conductivity from dyonic black holes,

    S. A. Hartnoll and P. Kovtun, “Hall conductivity from dyonic black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 066001, arXiv:0704.1160 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Thermodynamics and Instabilities of a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,

    D. Mateos and D. Trancanelli, “Thermodynamics and Instabilities of a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,” JHEP 07 (2011) 054, arXiv:1106.1637 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,

    S. Jain, N. Kundu, K. Sen, A. Sinha, and S. P. Trivedi, “A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,” JHEP 01 (2015) 005, arXiv:1406.4874 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Black Rubber and the Non-linear Elastic Response of Scale Invariant Solids,

    M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, and O. Pujolas, “Black Rubber and the Non-linear Elastic Response of Scale Invariant Solids,” JHEP 09 (2020) 013, arXiv:2006.10774 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Nonlinear elasticity, yielding, and entropy in – 40 – amorphous solids,

    D. Pan, T. Ji, M. Baggioli, L. Li, and Y. Jin, “Nonlinear elasticity, yielding, and entropy in – 40 – amorphous solids,” Sci. Adv. 8 no. 22, (2022) abm8028, arXiv:2108.13124 [cond-mat.soft]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Thermoelectric transport in holographic quantum matter under shear strain,

    T. Ji, L. Li, and H.-T. Sun, “Thermoelectric transport in holographic quantum matter under shear strain,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 no. 1, (2023) 015401, arXiv:2208.08803 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 1, vol. 5 of Course of Theoretical Physics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980

    1980

  20. [28]

    Magnetising the N = 4 Super Yang-Mills plasma,

    A. Ballon-Bayona, J. P. Shock, and D. Zoakos, “Magnetising the N = 4 Super Yang-Mills plasma,” JHEP 06 (2022) 154, arXiv:2203.00050 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Strang, Introduction to Linear Algebra

    G. Strang, Introduction to Linear Algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley, MA, fourth ed., 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    Thermoelectric DC conductivities from black hole horizons,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Thermoelectric DC conductivities from black hole horizons,” JHEP 11 (2014) 081, arXiv:1406.4742 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Magnetothermoelectric Response from Holography,

    M. Blake, A. Donos, and N. Lohitsiri, “Magnetothermoelectric Response from Holography,” JHEP 08 (2015) 124, arXiv:1502.03789 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Holographic Q-lattices,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Holographic Q-lattices,” JHEP 04 (2014) 040, arXiv:1311.3292 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ¨Uber die physikalischen Grundlagen der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,

    F. Kottler, “ ¨Uber die physikalischen Grundlagen der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,” Annalen Phys. 361 no. 14, (1918) 401–462

    1918

  26. [34]

    Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory,

    L. J. Romans, “Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 383 (1992) 395–415, arXiv:hep-th/9203018

    1992 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, “Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 104026, arXiv:hep-th/9904197

    1999 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003

    2003

  29. [37]

    Coherent/incoherent metal transition in a holographic model,

    K.-Y. Kim, K. K. Kim, Y. Seo, and S.-J. Sin, “Coherent/incoherent metal transition in a holographic model,” JHEP 12 (2014) 170, arXiv:1409.8346 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Anisotropic plasma at finite U (1) chemical potential,

    L. Cheng, X.-H. Ge, and S.-J. Sin, “Anisotropic plasma at finite U (1) chemical potential,” JHEP 07 (2014) 083, arXiv:1404.5027 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Holographic quantum matter,

    S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas, and S. Sachdev, “Holographic quantum matter,” arXiv:1612.07324 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Magnetic Brane Solutions in AdS,

    E. D’Hoker and P. Kraus, “Magnetic Brane Solutions in AdS,” JHEP 10 (2009) 088, arXiv:0908.3875 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    On the interplay between magnetic field and anisotropy in holographic QCD,

    U. G¨ ursoy, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs, and J. F. Pedraza, “On the interplay between magnetic field and anisotropy in holographic QCD,” JHEP 03 (2021) 180, arXiv:2011.09474 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    On holographic disorder-driven metal-insulator transitions,

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, “On holographic disorder-driven metal-insulator transitions,” JHEP 01 (2017) 040, arXiv:1601.07897 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Holographic Phonons,

    L. Alberte, M. Ammon, A. Jim´ enez-Alba, M. Baggioli, and O. Pujol` as, “Holographic Phonons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 17, (2018) 171602, arXiv:1711.03100 [hep-th]. – 41 –

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601, arXiv:hep-th/0405231

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Breaking rotations without violating the KSS viscosity bound,

    M. Baggioli, S. Cremonini, L. Early, L. Li, and H.-T. Sun, “Breaking rotations without violating the KSS viscosity bound,” JHEP 07 (2023) 016, arXiv:2304.01807 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Shear viscoelasticity in anisotropic holographic axion model,

    L. Li, W.-J. Li, and X.-M. Kuang, “Shear viscoelasticity in anisotropic holographic axion model,” arXiv:2410.10161 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hydrodynamic modes in holographic multiple-axion model,

    L.-Z. Xia and W.-J. Li, “Hydrodynamic modes in holographic multiple-axion model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 no. 11, (2024) 1236, arXiv:2405.17092 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Mechanical stability of homogeneous holographic solids under finite shear strain,

    M. Baggioli, L. Li, W.-J. Li, and H.-T. Sun, “Mechanical stability of homogeneous holographic solids under finite shear strain,” JHEP 05 (2024) 198, arXiv:2311.16423 [hep-th]. – 42 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.