Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 102 references

Structure and Dynamic Evolution of Interfaces between Polymer Solutions and Gels and Polymer Interdiffusion: A Molecular Dynamics Study

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that at an interface between a crosslinked polymer gel and a semidilute solution of identical free polymers, the interfacial tension and the local interfacial width both increase with free-polymer concentration, in…

desk verdict First simulation study of polymer gel/solution interfaces, with solid dynamics and percolation results; the headline gamma-w_int correlation rests on a degenerately fitted capillary wave model and should be treated as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11346 v1 pith:USH7QWT6 submitted 2024-12-16 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechphysics.chem-ph

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechphysics.chem-ph
keywords gel-solutioninterfacecapillarywavesinterfacialtensionpolymernetworkinterdiffusionpercolationmoleculardynamicssimulationcore-shellmicrogel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens where a crosslinked polymer gel meets a semidilute solution of identical free polymers, a geometry central to making core–shell hydrogel particles. Using coarse-grained molecular dynamics, it shows the interface is not a liquid–liquid-like boundary: after an initial osmotic compression followed by swelling, the interface reaches local equilibrium on the time scale of about 100 chain relaxations, and its two key parameters, the interfacial tension and the local interfacial width, both rise as the free-polymer concentration increases. That positive correlation is the opposite of liquid–liquid interfaces, where a narrower interface carries more tension because the two components are more incompatible. The authors argue that here tension comes from elasticity and entropy rather than incompatibility, and they extract it with a capillary wave model modified for gel elasticity. If right, the result gives processing control: shell concentration and crosslinking time set the strength of the connection between core and shell.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a capillary wave model generalized to an elastic interface. The interface is described by a height field $h(y,z)$ with an effective Hamiltonian $$H = \int dy\,dz\, \left[ \gamma \left(1 + \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\tfrac{\partial h}{\partial y}\right)^2 + \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\tfrac{\partial h}{\partial z}\right)^2\right) + \tfrac{1}{2} B $h^{2}$ \right],$$ where $\gamma$ is the surface stress and $B$ an elastic coupling to the gel. Thermal equipartition then gives height correlations $\langle |\hat{h}(\mathbf{q})|^2 \rangle = k_B T / (B + \gamma q^2)$, and the apparent interfacial width as a function of lateral block size becomes $$$w^{2}$ = w_{\mathrm{int}}^2 + \frac{k_B T}{8\gamma}\ln\left(\frac{1 + g b_{\mathrm{int}}^2}{1 + g L_\$parallel^{2}$}\right) + \frac{k_B T}{4\gamma}\ln\left(\frac{L_\parallel}{b_{\mathrm{int}}}\right),$$ with $g = B/(4\pi^2\gamma)$. The authors fit this expression to block-size-resolved width data, and use an independent bulk-modulus estimate to discard the unphysical high-$B$ branch of the fit, which lets them read off $\gamma$ and track $w_{\mathrm{int}}$.

What would settle it

Simulate the same gel–solution system but measure the bulk modulus of the gel independently at each absorbed-polymer concentration, fix $B$ to that measured value in the capillary-wave formula, and re-extract $\gamma$ and $w_{\mathrm{int}}$. If the fitted intrinsic width no longer increases with concentration, the reported positive correlation is an artifact of the four-parameter fit rather than a property of the interface. A second decisive check is to run the same block-size analysis on a simulated liquid–liquid interface with known anticorrelated $\gamma$ and $w_{\mathrm{int}}$; the fitting protocol must recover that anticorrelation to be trustworthy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a qualitative inversion of the usual interface rule. For interfaces between demixed liquids, interfacial tension and interfacial width are anticorrelated; in Cahn–Hilliard-type theories they are inversely proportional. For the gel–solution interface simulated here, both increase with the concentration of free polymers, and the increase is roughly linear for the tension. The same monomers make up the gel strands and the free chains, so incompatibility plays no role; the interfacial tension is a surface stress set by gel elasticity, and the swelling caused by penetrating polymers both widens the interface and stiffens the gel, raising the tension. The paper also establishes the time course: the gel first compresses under osmotic pressure and then swells as polymers diffuse in, the interfacial region locally equilibrates after roughly one hundred chain relaxation times while the gel as a whole keeps absorbing polymer, and free chains inside the gel undergo a percolation transition at a local density of order the overlap concentration.

Load-bearing premise

The whole interfacial-tension extraction rests on assuming that the gel–solution interface can be represented as a flat height field with a single isotropic surface stress and one elastic coupling, and that the four-parameter fit reliably separates that stress from the intrinsic width after the large-$B$ branch is discarded.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The interface between a gel and an identical-polymer solution behaves as an elastic, entropic interface: raising free-polymer concentration makes it both wider and more tense, so interfacial structure can be tuned by solution concentration alone.
  • In core–shell hydrogel fabrication, the degree of interfacial stitching saturates at a value near that of random Gaussian coils, but only after times of order 100 chain relaxation times; crosslinking early gives weak connectivity, crosslinking late gives strong connectivity.
  • Once the local density of free chains inside the gel exceeds roughly the overlap concentration, they form a spanning cluster that interpenetrates the network; this percolating cluster should further strengthen the core–shell bond after crosslinking.
  • Because the apparent width measured from density profiles is inflated by capillary waves, comparisons between systems of different lateral sizes must account for the logarithmic broadening when quoting interfacial widths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the positive $\gamma$–$w$ correlation is generic, it suggests a design rule for layered hydrogel assembly: load-bearing interfaces can be made simultaneously broader and more energetic by raising the polymer content, which is the opposite of what incompatibility-driven interfaces permit.
  • A direct mechanical test would settle the interpretation: independently measure the surface stress (for example, by deforming a gel slab and applying the Shuttleworth relation) and compare it to the capillary-wave $\gamma$; agreement would confirm the fit's physical branch.
  • The mesh-size dependence is a natural next target: the mechanism predicts that at fixed solution concentration, softer (larger-mesh) gels should show smaller $\gamma$ and possibly a different $w_{\mathrm{int}}$, which could be tested by varying strand length without changing chemistry.
  • The reported percolation threshold of order the overlap concentration, if it persists in equilibrated systems, would let experimentalists estimate how deep into a core the shell-polymer network extends before crosslinking, purely from diffusion time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of the interface between a crosslinked gel slab (diamond network topology) and a semidilute solution of identical linear polymers in implicit good solvent. It reports two dynamical regimes (initial osmotic compression followed by swelling), characterizes interdiffusion and interfacial integration (DII, Σ), identifies a percolation transition of free chains inside the gel near the overlap concentration, and analyzes interfacial fluctuations using a capillary-wave model extended with an elastic coupling term B. The central claim is that both the interfacial tension γ and the intrinsic interfacial width w_int increase with increasing free-polymer concentration, in contrast to the anticorrelation expected for liquid-liquid interfaces.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a genuinely novel and counterintuitive result for gel-solution interfaces, with practical relevance for core-shell microgel fabrication. The dynamic observations (compression/swelling, DII saturation, percolation onset) are based on direct density and connectivity measurements and appear robust. The capillary-wave derivation in the appendix is self-contained, and the analysis code is provided on GitHub, which are strengths. However, the headline γ-w_int correlation rests on a four-parameter fit of Eq. (19) that the authors themselves call 'somewhat brash' and that involves a branch-selection step based on the bulk modulus of a bare gel. Since the branch selection is load-bearing for the central claim, the significance is conditional on resolving the identifiability of γ.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.II.2] The two-branch fit degeneracy is not resolved by the stated constraints on w_int and b_int. The authors discard the branch with B > 0.5 ε/σ^4 by comparing to the bulk modulus of a bare gel (SI S2), but the gel in the simulated interface contains absorbed free polymers whose concentration increases with ρ_sol^f and which stiffen the gel; the relevant elastic coupling B for the interface with absorbed chains is not measured. If the true B is neither branch, or if B increases with concentration, the chosen B=0 branch can absorb the concentration dependence into γ, producing a spurious positive correlation. Please provide a direct cross-check, e.g., fit the height spectrum ⟨|h(q)|²⟩ = k_B T / (B + γ q²) from the simulation, or test the predicted lateral box-size dependence in Eq. (19). Without such a check, the specific claim that γ (rather than a fitting artifact) increases with ρ_sol^f is not established.
  2. [III.II.2] The authors state that γ is reliable because constraining w_int or b_int does not affect γ and B, but that only addresses the internal correlation among the intrinsic-width parameters, not the branch-selection problem. The branch selection is an external constraint based on a different system (bare gel). Please report the fitting range of b, the number of independent data points, the full covariance matrix of the four-parameter fit, and the sensitivity of the resulting γ(ρ_sol^f) to the assumed B (e.g., re-fit with B fixed at several values spanning the bare-gel estimate). This would allow readers to judge whether the positive trend in Figures 11(b) and 12(b) is robust to the branch choice.
  3. [III.I.2] The criterion for local interfacial equilibrium is based on saturation of density profiles, DII, and Σ at t ~ 100 τ_d, but capillary waves on the largest lateral length scales have the slowest relaxation times and may not be equilibrated on that timescale. The paper does not show any time dependence of the apparent width w^2(b) at large b between t ≈ 100 τ_d and the end of the simulation (1.28×10^6 τ ≈ 240 τ_d). If the long-wavelength height modes are still evolving, the extracted γ could be biased. Please check the stationarity of w^2(b) at large b or justify why the capillary-wave modes are equilibrated on the same timescale as the local density profiles.
minor comments (5)
  1. [VI] The word 'ansiotropic' should be 'anisotropic' in the Supporting Information video description.
  2. [Fig. 5] The caption contains the stray text 'mull, gel' that appears to be a typographical artifact and should be removed.
  3. [References] The reference for free radical polymerization is malformed and should be corrected to list the authors and journal properly.
  4. [IV] The word 'strenghtens' should be 'strengthens' in the final paragraph of the Conclusions.
  5. [III.I.2] In the definition of d, it should be stated explicitly that the sum over j runs over monomers of a single free polymer crossing the interface; the current notation is ambiguous about whether j runs over all monomers in the system.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the capillary-wave fit is self-contained, and the reported gamma-w_int correlation is an empirical extraction rather than a fitted input disguised as a prediction.

full rationale

The central claim is that the interfacial tension and intrinsic width both increase with free-polymer concentration. This is presented as an extracted simulation result, not as a prediction derived from the model. The interfacial tension gamma is an output of fitting Eq. (19) to block-size-dependent apparent widths; it is not inserted as an input, and the same curve also supplies w_int. The capillary-wave expression is derived in the appendix from the interface Hamiltonian (14) via the equipartition theorem, so the fit is not relying on the paper's own conclusion. The self-citations to prior capillary-wave work (e.g., refs. 88, 96, 98) support the standard convolution/broadening formalism and are independently testable; they do not carry the specific claim that gamma and w_int are positively correlated. The branch selection between B > 0.5 and B ~ 1e-9 is a modeling judgment based on an independent bulk-modulus estimate; even if that judgment is debatable (the bare-gel modulus does not directly measure B for a gel containing absorbed chains, and the units of B and K differ), it is a correctness/identifiability concern rather than a circular reduction. No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to produce, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative conclusions rest on fitted parameters, especially gamma, w_int, b_int, and B, and on modeling assumptions about the capillary wave description of the gel-solution interface. The qualitative dynamic results, compression, swelling, local equilibration, and DII saturation, are more direct measurements and depend mainly on the standard simulation model.

free parameters (7)
  • gamma (interfacial tension / surface stress) = values shown in Figures 11(b) and 12(b), roughly linear increase with rho_sol^f
    Extracted from a four-parameter fit of interfacial width vs block size to Eq. (19). The authors report large errors and a branch selection.
  • w_int^2 (intrinsic squared interfacial width) = varies with rho_sol^f; values not tabulated, large errors reported
    Same four-parameter fit; the authors note w_int and b_int strongly depend on each other.
  • b_int (intrinsic length scale) = not reported directly; strongly correlated with w_int
    Same fit; the authors note that constraining one parameter only affects the other, not B or gamma.
  • B (elastic coupling constant in capillary wave Hamiltonian) = chosen branch approximately 1e-9 epsilon/sigma^4, zero within error; alternative branch greater than 0.5 rejected
    Determined from the same fit; the authors selected the near-zero branch as physically reasonable based on the bulk modulus of the bare gel.
  • rho_f,eq (equilibrium density of free monomers in the gel center) = estimated from fit to Eq. (4), shown in inset of Figure 5(a)
    Used to infer the final density inside the gel and to locate the percolation threshold.
  • rho* (overlap concentration) from equation of state = approximately 0.024 to 0.025 sigma^-3
    Fitted via the de Gennes scaling expression Eq. (S1) in the SI; an alternative estimate from Rg gives about 0.06 sigma^-3.
  • Chain contact cutoff for clustering = 2 sigma
    Chains are considered connected if at least two monomers from different chains are within 2 sigma; this hand-chosen cutoff affects the percolation results.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Kremer-Grest bead-spring model with WCA and FENE potentials faithfully represents polymer physics in a good solvent.
    Section II defines the model; the results depend on this being representative of real polymer solutions and gels.
  • domain assumption A regular diamond-lattice network is a relevant model for tetra-PEG gels and for the microgel cores of interest.
    Sections I and II motivate the network choice by correlation with experimental tetrafunctional crosslinker chemistry.
  • domain assumption The gel-solution interface can be represented as a single-valued height function h(y,z) with no overhangs and with negligible coupling between the two slab interfaces.
    Section III.II.2 and the Appendix state 'Neglecting overhangs, we describe the surface by a function h(y,z)' and treat each surface independently.
  • domain assumption The effective interface Hamiltonian (Eq. 14) with isotropic surface stress gamma and elastic constant B captures the capillary fluctuations of this interface.
    Section III.II.2 introduces Eq. (14); the authors explicitly ignore possible anisotropy of gamma for anisotropic gels.
  • standard math The apparent interfacial width w^2 is the convolution of an intrinsic profile with a Gaussian height distribution, giving w^2 = w_int^2 + (pi/2) <h^2> (Eq. 18).
    Section III.II.2, Eqs. (17) and (18), a standard capillary wave broadening result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structure and Dynamic Evolution of Interfaces between Polymer Solutions and Gels and Polymer Interdiffusion: A Molecular Dynamics Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/USH7QWT6

@misc{pith2026241211346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structure and Dynamic Evolution of Interfaces between Polymer Solutions and Gels and Polymer Interdiffusion: A Molecular Dynamics Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/USH7QWT6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11346}
}
read the original abstract

Letting free polymers diffuse from solution into a crosslinked polymer gel is often a crucial processing step in the synthesis of multiphase polymer-based gels, e.g., core-shell microgels. Here we use coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to obtain molecular insights into this process. We consider idealized situations where the gel is modeled as a regular polymer network with the topology of a diamond lattice, and all free polymers and strands have the same length and consist of the same type of monomer. After bringing the gel and the polymer solution into contact, two time regimes are observed: An initial compression of the gel caused by the osmotic pressure of the solution, followed by an expansion due to swelling. We characterize the time evolution of density profiles, the penetration of free polymers into the gel and the connection between the gel and solution phase. The interfacial structure locally equilibrates after roughly 100 chain relaxation times. At late times, the free chains inside the gel undergo a percolation transition if the polymer concentration in the gel exceeds a critical value, which is of the same order as the overlap concentration. The fluctuations of the interface can be described by a capillary wave model that accounts for the elasticity of the gel. Based on this, we extract the interfacial tension of the gel-solution interface. Interestingly, both the interfacial tension and the local interfacial width increase with increasing free polymer concentration - in contrast to liquid-liquid interfaces, where these two quantities are typically anticorrelated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of a regular bulk diamond network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Setup of diffusive interpenetration study: A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Maximum gradient of the rescaled monomer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Monomer density in the solution phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Monomer densities at the center of the gel slab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) DII vs scaled time t/τd for various concen￾trations ρsolf . (b) Scaled areal density Σ of free chain monomers with connection to the interface vs. scaled time t/τd. Dashed line indicates time after which Σ sat￾urates. The gel is anisotropic. of these polymers separ…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Figure (6) for the isotropic gel that both, the DII and Σ, saturate at about the same time as the local monomer density profiles. The saturation time can be as long as tsat ∼ 100τd. At late times beyond tsat, the local density profiles and the local connectivit…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a-c) Cluster formation of free chains within the gel region as viewed from top of the box (along z-axis) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Profiles of chain conformation parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Apparent squared interfacial width w 2 as a function of block size b (see text for explanation). The dashed lines represent the fit to Equation (19), see text for details. (b) Fitted value of interfacial tension γ vs polymer concentration ρsolf . The dashed line s…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematics of the method use for extracting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hydrogels: Recent Advances; Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials; Springer Singapore, 2018

    Thakur, V.; Thakur, M. Hydrogels: Recent Advances; Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials; Springer Singapore, 2018

  2. [2]

    Applications of Hydrogels with Special Physical Properties in Biomedicine

    Chen, G.; Tang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Chen, C.; Zhu, Z. Applications of Hydrogels with Special Physical Properties in Biomedicine . Polymers 2019, 11, 1420, DOI: doi:10.3390/polym11091420

  3. [3]

    Retracted Article : Gel scaffolds and emerging applications in biomedicine

    Rajasekar, M.; Lavanya, M. Retracted Article : Gel scaffolds and emerging applications in biomedicine. RSC Advances 2022, 12, 15925--15949, DOI: doi:10.1039/D2RA00924B

  4. [4]

    P.; Gasiorowski, J

    Jung, J. P.; Gasiorowski, J. Z.; Collier, J. H. Fibrillar Peptide Gels in Biotechnology and Biomedicine. Biopolymers 2010, 94, 49--59, DOI: doi:10.1002/bip.21326

  5. [5]

    Mesoporous Materials Make Hydrogels More Powerful in Biomedicine

    Chen, H.; Qiu, X.; Xia, T.; Li, Q.; Wen, Z.; Huang, B.; Li, Y. Mesoporous Materials Make Hydrogels More Powerful in Biomedicine. Gels 2023, 9, 207, DOI: doi:10.3390/gels9030207

  6. [6]

    Components, mechanisms and applications of stimuli-responsive polymer gels

    Yuan, Z.; Ding, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, B.; Song, Z.; Meng, X.; Ma, X.; Gong, X.; Huang, Z.; Ma, S.; Xiang, S.; Xu, W. Components, mechanisms and applications of stimuli-responsive polymer gels. European Polymer Journal 2022, 177, 111473, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111473

  7. [7]

    A Review of Research Progress on the Performance of Intelligent Polymer Gel

    Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Guan, J.; Yang, P.; Asel, M. A Review of Research Progress on the Performance of Intelligent Polymer Gel. Molecules 2023, 28, 4246, DOI: doi:10.3390/molecules28104246

  8. [8]

    Horkay, F.; Douglas, J. F. In Gels and other soft amorphous solids; Horkay, F., Douglas, J., DelGado, E., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; ACS: 1155 sixteenth ST NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA, 2018; Vol. 1296; pp 1--13

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations

    Peppas, N.; Bures, P.; Leobandung, W.; Ichikawa, H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000, 50, 27--46, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-4

  2. [10]

    'Smart' polymers and what they could do in biotechnology and medicine

    Galaev, I.; Mattiasson, B. 'Smart' polymers and what they could do in biotechnology and medicine. Trends in biotechnology 1999, 17, 335—340, DOI: doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(99)01345-1

  3. [11]

    Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery

    Qiu, Y.; Park, K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001, 53, 321--339, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00203-4

  4. [12]

    Ullah, F.; Othman, M. B. H.; Javed, F.; Ahmad, Z.; Akil, H. M. Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2015, 57, 414--433, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053

  5. [13]

    A.; Fei, R.; Cote, G

    Abraham, A. A.; Fei, R.; Cote, G. L.; Grunlan, M. A. Self-Cleaning Membrane to Extend the Lifetime of an Implanted Glucose Biosensor. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2013, 5, 12832--12838, DOI: doi:10.1021/am4040653

  6. [14]

    C.; Lee, S

    Hou, Y.; Fei, R.; Burkes, J. C.; Lee, S. D.; Munoz-Pinto, D.; Hahn, M. S.; Grunlan, M. A. Thermoresponsive Nanocomposite Hydrogels: Transparency, Rapid Deswelling and Cell Release. Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering 2011, 1, 93--100, DOI: doi:10.1166/jbt.2011.1005

  7. [15]

    L.; Zulli, F.; Piovanelli, M.; Giordano, M.; Mazzolai, B.; Beccai, L.; Andreozzi, L

    Puleo, G. L.; Zulli, F.; Piovanelli, M.; Giordano, M.; Mazzolai, B.; Beccai, L.; Andreozzi, L. Mechanical and rheological behavior of pNIPAAM crosslinked macrohydrogel. Reactive & Functional Polymers 2013, 73, 1306--1318, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.07.004

  8. [16]

    Elastic anomaly near the critical point of volume phase transition in polymer gels

    Hirotsu, S. Elastic anomaly near the critical point of volume phase transition in polymer gels. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 903--905, DOI: doi:10.1021/ma00205a036

  9. [17]

    Thermo-responsive sandwiched-like membranes of IPN-PNIPAAm/PAAm hydrogels

    Guilherme, M.; Campese, G.; Radovanovic, E.; Rubira, A.; Tambourgi, E.; Muniz, E. Thermo-responsive sandwiched-like membranes of IPN-PNIPAAm/PAAm hydrogels. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 275, 187--194, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.019

  10. [18]

    Phase Behavior of Thermally Responsive Microgel Colloids

    Wu, J.; Zhou, B.; Hu, Z. Phase Behavior of Thermally Responsive Microgel Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 048304, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.048304

  11. [19]

    Adhesion and Mechanical Properties of PNIPAM Microgel Films and Their Potential Use as Switchable Cell Culture Substrates

    Schmidt, S.; Zeiser, M.; Hellweg, T.; Duschl, C.; Fery, A.; Möhwald, H. Adhesion and Mechanical Properties of PNIPAM Microgel Films and Their Potential Use as Switchable Cell Culture Substrates. Advanced Functional Materials 2010, 20, 3235--3243, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.10...

  12. [20]

    Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification

    Discher, D. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. FEBS Journal 2010, 7003

  13. [21]

    Hartmann, R.; Weidenbach, M.; Neubauer, M.; Fery, A.; Parak, W. J. Stiffness-Dependent In Vitro Uptake and Lysosomal Acidification of Colloidal Particles. Angewandte Chemi-International Edition 2015, 54, 1365--1368, DOI: doi:10.1002/anie.201409693

  14. [22]

    Core–Shell Microgels with Switchable Elasticity at Constant Interfacial Interaction

    Seuss, M.; Schmolke, W.; Drechsler, A.; Fery, A.; Seiffert, S. Core–Shell Microgels with Switchable Elasticity at Constant Interfacial Interaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2016, 8, 16317--16327, DOI: doi:10.1021/acsami.6b04339

  15. [23]

    V.; Balazs, A

    Biswas, S.; Yashin, V. V.; Balazs, A. C. Dynamic behavior of chemically tunable mechano-responsive hydrogels. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 10664--10674, DOI: doi:10.1039/D1SM01188J

  16. [24]

    V.; Aizenberg, M.; Aizenberg, J.; Balazs, A

    Chatterjee, R.; Biswas, S.; Yashin, V. V.; Aizenberg, M.; Aizenberg, J.; Balazs, A. C. Controllable growth of interpenetrating or random copolymer networks. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 7177--7187, DOI: doi:10.1039/D1SM00611H

  17. [25]

    P.; Zhou, L.; Biswas, S.; Klier, J.; Balazs, A

    Sonu, K. P.; Zhou, L.; Biswas, S.; Klier, J.; Balazs, A. C.; Emrick, T.; Peyton, S. R. Strain-Stiffening Hydrogels with Dynamic, Secondary Cross-Linking. Langmuir 2023, 39, 2659--2666, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03117, PMID: 36752594

  18. [26]

    M.; DeSimone, A

    Noselli, G.; Lucantonio, A.; McMeeking, R. M.; DeSimone, A. Poroelastic toughening in polymer gels: A theoretical and numerical study. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2016, 94, 33--46, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.04.017

  19. [27]

    Transient analysis of swelling-induced large deformations in polymer gels

    Lucantonio, A.; Nardinocchi, P.; Teresi, L. Transient analysis of swelling-induced large deformations in polymer gels. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2013, 61, 205--218, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2012.07.010

  20. [28]

    Structural properties and swelling behavior of randomly crosslinked polymer networks: A Monte Carlo study

    Sommer, J.-U. Structural properties and swelling behavior of randomly crosslinked polymer networks: A Monte Carlo study. Macromolecular Symposia 1994, 81, 139--152, DOI: doi:10.1002/masy.19940810116

  21. [29]

    Topological interactions in model polymer networks

    Everaers, R.; Kremer, K. Topological interactions in model polymer networks. Physical Review E 1999, 53, R37, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.53.R37

  22. [30]

    Entanglement effects in defect-free polymer networks

    Everaers, R. Entanglement effects in defect-free polymer networks. New Journal of Physics 1999, 1, 12, DOI: doi:10.1088/1367-2630/1/1/312

  23. [31]

    R.; Curro, J

    Rottach, D. R.; Curro, J. G.; Budzien, J.; Grest, G. S.; Svaneborg, C.; Everaers, R. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Polymer Networks Undergoing Sequential Cross-Linking and Scission Reactions. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 131--139, DOI: doi:10.1021/ma062139l

  24. [32]

    A.; Holm, C.; Kremer, K

    Mann, B. A.; Holm, C.; Kremer, K. Swelling of Polyelectrolyte Networks. Journal of Chemical Physics 2005, 122, 154903

  25. [33]

    Simulations explain the swelling behavior of hydrogels with alternating neutral and weakly acidic blocks

    Beyer, D.; Kosovan, P.; Holm, C. Simulations explain the swelling behavior of hydrogels with alternating neutral and weakly acidic blocks. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 10751--10760, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01916

  26. [34]

    Monte Carlo simulation of the gelation process of the aqueous polymer weak gel

    Yang, J.; Cao, X.; Zhang, K.; Song, X.; Qiu, F.; Xu, Y. Monte Carlo simulation of the gelation process of the aqueous polymer weak gel. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities-Chinese 2006, 27, 579--582

  27. [35]

    A.; Gelissen, A

    Brugnoni, M.; Scotti, A.; Rudov, A. A.; Gelissen, A. P. H.; Caumanns, T.; Radulescu, A.; Eckert, T.; Pich, A.; Potemkin, I. I.; Richtering, W. Swelling of a Responsive Network within Different Constraints in Multi-Thermosensitive Microgels. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 2662--2671,...

  28. [36]

    R.; Mrozek, R

    Sliozberg, Y. R.; Mrozek, R. A.; Schieber, J. D.; Kr\"oger, M.; Lenhart, J. L.; Andzelm, J. W. Effect of polymer solvent on the mechanical properties of entangled polymer gels: Coarse-grained molecular simulation. Polymer 2013, 54, 2555--2564, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.017

  29. [37]

    Effect of chain composition on the mechanical response of structural gel: A molecular dynamics simulation

    Fu, C.-L.; Jia, X.-Z.; Sun, Z.-Y.; An, L.-J. Effect of chain composition on the mechanical response of structural gel: A molecular dynamics simulation. Polymer 2014, 55, 4538--4545, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.006

  30. [38]

    Sean, D.; Slater, G. W. Langevin dynamics simulations of driven polymer translocation into a cross-linked gel. Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 653--658, DOI: doi:10.1002/elps.201600438

  31. [39]

    V.; Gumerov, R

    Anakhov, M. V.; Gumerov, R. A.; Potemkin, I. I. Stimuli-responsive aqueous microgels: properties and applications. Mendeleev Communications 2020, 30, 555--562, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2020.09.002

  32. [40]

    A.; Rudov, A

    Mourran, A.; Wu, Y.; Gumerov, R. A.; Rudov, A. A.; Potemkin, I. I.; Pich, A.; Möller, M. When Colloidal Particles Become Polymer Coils. Langmuir 2016, 32, 723--730, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03931

  33. [41]

    G.; Ciobanu, M.; Patrickios, C

    Tsalikis, D. G.; Ciobanu, M.; Patrickios, C. S.; Higuchi, Y. Model amphiphilic copolymer conetworks in the bulk: Dissipative particle dynamics simulations of their self-assembly and mechanical properties. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 9299--9311, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01392

  34. [42]

    Yong, X.; Kuksenok, O.; Balazs, A. C. Modeling free radical polymerization using dissipative particle dynamics. Polymer 2015, 72, 217--225, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.052, Macromolecular Engineering - Dedicated to Professor Krzysztof Matyjaszewski on th...

  35. [43]

    Liu, Y.; Aizenberg, J.; Balazs, A. C. Using Dissipative Particle Dynamics to Model Effects of Chemical Reactions Occurring within Hydrogels. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, DOI: doi:10.3390/nano11102764

  36. [44]

    A.; Rudyak, V

    Gavrilov, A. A.; Rudyak, V. Y.; Chertovich, A. V. Computer simulation of the core-shell microgels synthesis via precipitation polymerization. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2020, 574, 393--398, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.064

  37. [45]

    Numerical modelling of non-ionic microgels: An overview

    Rovigatti, L.; Gnan, N.; Tavagnacco, L.; Moreno, A.; Zaccarelli, E. Numerical modelling of non-ionic microgels: An overview. Soft Matter 2019, 15, DOI: doi:10.1039/C8SM02089B

  38. [46]

    Mesoscale modeling of microgel mechanics and kinetics through the swelling transition

    Nikolov, S.; Fernandez-Nieves, A.; Alexeev, A. Mesoscale modeling of microgel mechanics and kinetics through the swelling transition. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 2018, 39, 47--62, DOI: doi:10.1007/s10483-018-2259-6

  39. [47]

    A.; Potemkin, I

    Geisel, K.; Rudov, A. A.; Potemkin, I. I.; Richtering, W. Hollow and Core–Shell Microgels at Oil–Water Interfaces: Spreading of Soft Particles Reduces the Compressibility of the Monolayer. Langmuir 2015, 31, 13145--13154, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03530

  40. [48]

    Esteves, A. C. C.; Lyakhova, K.; van der Ven, L. G. J.; van Benthem, R. A. T. M.; de With, G. Surface Segregation of Low Surface Energy Polymeric Dangling Chains in a Cross-Linked Polymer Network Investigated by a Combined Experimental-Simulation Approach. Macromolecules 2013,...

  41. [49]

    A.; Rovigatti, L.; Antonopoulou, M.-N.; Gnan, N.; Ninarello, A.; Isa, L.; Zaccarelli, E

    Camerin, F.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, M. A.; Rovigatti, L.; Antonopoulou, M.-N.; Gnan, N.; Ninarello, A.; Isa, L.; Zaccarelli, E. Microgels Adsorbed at Liquid-Liquid Interfaces: A Joint Numerical and Experimental Study. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 4548--4559, DOI: doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b00390

  42. [50]

    Microgels at Interfaces Behave as 2D Elastic Particles Featuring Reentrant Dynamics

    Camerin, F.; Gnan, N.; Ruiz-Franco, J.; Ninarello, A.; Rovigatti, L.; Zaccarelli, E. Microgels at Interfaces Behave as 2D Elastic Particles Featuring Reentrant Dynamics. Physical Review X 2020, 10, 031012, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031012

  43. [51]

    A.; Filippov, S

    Gumerov, R. A.; Filippov, S. A.; Richtering, W.; Pich, A.; Potemkin, I. I. Amphiphilic microgels adsorbed at oil-water interfaces as mixers of two immiscible liquids. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 3978--3986, DOI: doi:10.1039/c9sm00389d

  44. [52]

    Dynamics of entangled linear polymers: A molecular dynamics simulation

    Kremer, K.; Grest, G. Dynamics of entangled linear polymers: A molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Chemical Physics 1990, 92, 5057--5086, DOI: doi:10.1063/1.458541

  45. [53]

    A.; Fleck, F.; Hojdis, N.; Svaneborg, C

    Everaers, R.; Karimi-Varzaneh, H. A.; Fleck, F.; Hojdis, N.; Svaneborg, C. Kremer–Grest Models for Commodity Polymer Melts: Linking Theory, Experiment, and Simulation at the Kuhn Scale. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 1901--1916, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02428

  46. [54]

    A.; de Pablo , J

    Escobedo, F. A.; de Pablo , J. J. Molecular simulation of polymeric networks and gels: phase behavior and swelling. Physics Reports 1999, 318, 85--112, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00012-5

  47. [55]

    Dass, P. K., N. N; Mahato New perspective in free radical polymerization. Indian journal of technology 1993,

  48. [56]

    Exploration of ideal polymer networks

    Shibayama, M. Exploration of ideal polymer networks. Macromolecular Symposia 2017, 372, 7--13, DOI: doi:10.1002/masy.201600122

  49. [57]

    Microfluidic formation of monodisperse tetra-PEG hydrogel microbeads for cell encapsulation

    Watanabe, T.; Takeuchi, S. Microfluidic formation of monodisperse tetra-PEG hydrogel microbeads for cell encapsulation. 2016 IEEE 29th International conference on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS). 345 E 47TH ST, New York, NY 10017 USA, 2016; pp 718--720, 29th IEEE Inter...

  50. [58]

    Mechanical properties of a polymer network of Tetra - PEG gel

    Sugimura, A.; Asai, M.; Matsunaga, T.; Akagi, Y.; Sakai, T.; Noguchi, H.; Shibayama, M. Mechanical properties of a polymer network of Tetra - PEG gel. Polymer Journal 2013, 45, 300--306, DOI: doi:10.1038/pj.2012.149, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  51. [59]

    Analysis of the sustained release ability of bevacizumab-loaded tetra-PEG gel

    Murakami, T.; Hoshi, S.; Okamoto, F.; Sakai, T.; Katashima, T.; Naito, M.; Oshika, T. Analysis of the sustained release ability of bevacizumab-loaded tetra-PEG gel. Experimental Eye Research 2022, 223, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.exer.2022.109206

  52. [60]

    Polymer network formation mechanism of multifunctional poly(ethylene glycol)s in ionic liquid electrolyte with a lithium salt

    Ishikawa, A.; Ikeda, N.; Maeda, S.; Fujii, K. Polymer network formation mechanism of multifunctional poly(ethylene glycol)s in ionic liquid electrolyte with a lithium salt. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23, 16966--16972, DOI: doi:10.1039/d1cp02710g

  53. [61]

    Structure and physical properties of dried Tetra-PEG gel

    Nomoto, Y.; Matsunaga, T.; Sakai, T.; Tosaka, M.; Shibayama, M. Structure and physical properties of dried Tetra-PEG gel. Polymer 2011, 52, 4123--4128, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.06.053

  54. [62]

    Swelling and tensile properties of tetra-Polyethylene glycol via Coarse-Grained Molecular Models

    Wang, E.; Escobedo, F. Swelling and tensile properties of tetra-Polyethylene glycol via Coarse-Grained Molecular Models. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations 2017, 26, 1600098, DOI: doi:10.1002/mats.201600098

  55. [63]

    Connectivity and Structural Defects in Model Hydrogels: A Combined Proton NMR and Monte Carlo Simulation Study

    Lange, F.; Schwenke, K.; Kurakazu, M.; Akagi, Y.; Chung, U.-i.; Lang, M.; Sommer, J.-U.; Sakai, T.; Saalwaechter, K. Connectivity and Structural Defects in Model Hydrogels: A Combined Proton NMR and Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 666--9674, DOI: doi:10....

  56. [64]

    Reid, R.; Sgobba, M.; Raveh, B.; Rastelli, G.; Sali, A.; Santi, D. V. Analytical and Simulation-Based Models for Drug Release and Gel-Degradation in a Tetra-PEG Hydrogel Drug-Delivery System. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 7359--7369, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01598

  57. [65]

    Solvation Structure of Poly(ethylene glycol) in Ionic Liquids Studied by High-energy X-ray Diffraction and Molecular Dynamics Simulations

    Asai, H.; Fujii, K.; Nishi, K.; Sakai, T.; Ohara, K.; Umebayashi, Y.; Shibayama, M. Solvation Structure of Poly(ethylene glycol) in Ionic Liquids Studied by High-energy X-ray Diffraction and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 2369--2375, DOI: doi:10.1021/...

  58. [66]

    A.; Olsen, B

    Lin, T.-S.; Wang, R.; Johnson, J. A.; Olsen, B. D. Topological Structure of Networks Formed from Symmetric Four-Arm Precursors. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 1224--1231, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01829

  59. [67]

    D.; Chandler, D.; Andersen, H

    Weeks, J. D.; Chandler, D.; Andersen, H. C. Role of Repulsive Forces in Determining the Equilibrium Structure of Simple Liquids . The Journal of Chemical Physics 1971, 54, 5237--5247, DOI: doi:10.1063/1.1674820

  60. [68]

    Jin, S.; Collins, L. R. Dynamics of dissolved polymer chains in isotropic turbulence. New Journal of Physics 2007, 9, 360, DOI: doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/360

  61. [69]

    A.; Glaser, J.; Glotzer, S

    Anderson, J. A.; Glaser, J.; Glotzer, S. C. HOOMD-blue: A Python package for high-performance molecular dynamics and hard particle Monte Carlo simulations. Computational Materials Science 2020, 173, 109363, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109363

  62. [70]

    https://github.com/glotzerlab/fresnel

    Fresnel: A Visualization Package for HOOMD-blue. https://github.com/glotzerlab/fresnel

  63. [71]

    Theory of Polymer Dynamics; Oxford University Press: New York, 1986

    Doi, M.; Edwards, S. Theory of Polymer Dynamics; Oxford University Press: New York, 1986

  64. [72]

    Rubinstein, M.; Colby, R. H. Polymer Physics; Oxford University Press: New York, 2003

  65. [73]

    Interfacial Diffusion and Bonding in Multilayer Polymer Films: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation

    Shi, M.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Jiao, Z.; Yang, W.; Tan, J.; Ding, Y. Interfacial Diffusion and Bonding in Multilayer Polymer Films: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2016, 120, 10018--10029, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b04471

  66. [74]

    D.; Harper, E

    Ramasubramani, V.; Dice, B. D.; Harper, E. S.; Spellings, M. P.; Anderson, J. A.; Glotzer, S. C. freud: A Software Suite for High Throughput Analysis of Particle Simulation Data. Computer Physics Communications 2020, 254, 107275, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107275

  67. [75]

    Large lattice simulation of random site percolation

    Macleod, S.; Jan, N. Large lattice simulation of random site percolation. International Journal of Modern Physics C 1998, 9, 289--294, DOI: doi:10.1142/S0129183198000212

  68. [76]

    Conductivity Percolation on a Square Lattice with Core-Shell Particles

    Shida, K.; Sahara, R.; Tripathi, M.; Mizuseki, H.; Kawazoe, Y. Conductivity Percolation on a Square Lattice with Core-Shell Particles. Materials TranscationS 2010, 51, 771--774, DOI: doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2009329

  69. [77]

    Lebrecht, W.; Gonzalez, M. I. Discreet percolation in tridimensional networks. Revista Mexicana De Fisica 2011, 57, 344--349

  70. [78]

    Computer Simulation of Percolation in a Two-dimensional Square Network

    Okal, P. Computer Simulation of Percolation in a Two-dimensional Square Network. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 10th International conference on Nanomaterials: Applications & Properties (NAP-2020). 2020

  71. [79]

    E.; dos Santos Lucena , L.; Roux, S

    de Freitas , J. E.; dos Santos Lucena , L.; Roux, S. Percolation as a dynamical phenomenon. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 1999, 266, 81--85, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00579-2

  72. [80]

    Y.; Peijs, T

    Zhang, H.; Bilotti, E.; Tu, W.; Lew, C. Y.; Peijs, T. Static and dynamic percolation of phenoxy/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. European polymers Journal 2015, 68, 128--138, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.022

  73. [81]

    Temperature and time dependence of conductive network formation: Dynamic percolation and percolation time

    Zhang, C.; Wang, P.; Ma, C.; Wu, G.; Sumita, M. Temperature and time dependence of conductive network formation: Dynamic percolation and percolation time. Polymer 2006, 47, 466--473, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.053

  74. [82]

    Sol-gel transition behavior near critical concentration and connectivity

    Sakai, T.; Katashima, T.; Matsushita, T.; Chung, U.-I. Sol-gel transition behavior near critical concentration and connectivity . Polymer Journal 2016, 48, 629--634, DOI: doi:10.1038/pj.2015.124

  75. [83]

    P.; Straube, E

    Adhikari, N. P.; Straube, E. Interfacial Properties of Asymmetric Polymer Mixtures. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations 2003, 12, 499--507, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mats.200350017

  76. [84]

    P.; Auhl, R.; Straube, E

    Adhikari, N. P.; Auhl, R.; Straube, E. Interfacial Properties of Flexible and Semiflexible Polymers. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations 2002, 11, 315--325, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3919(20020301)11:3<315::AID-MATS315>3.0.CO;2-6

  77. [85]

    G.; Rothman, D

    Flekk y, E. G.; Rothman, D. H. Fluctuating hydrodynamic interfaces: Theory and simulation. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 53, 1622--1643, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.53.1622

  78. [86]

    Senapati, S.; Berkowitz, M. L. Computer Simulation Study of the Interface Width of the Liquid/Liquid Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 176101, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.176101

  79. [87]

    S.; Widom, B

    Rowlinson, J. S.; Widom, B. Molecular theory of capillarity; Oxford University Press, 1989

  80. [88]

    ``Intrinsic'' profiles and capillary waves at homopolymer interfaces: A Monte Carlo study

    Werner, A.; Schmid, F.; M\"uller, M.; Binder, K. ``Intrinsic'' profiles and capillary waves at homopolymer interfaces: A Monte Carlo study. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 59, 728--738, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.59.728

  81. [89]

    Sferrazza, M.; Xiao, C.; Jones, R. A. L.; Bucknall, D. G.; Webster, J.; Penfold, J. Evidence for Capillary Waves at Immiscible Polymer/Polymer Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 3693--3696, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3693

  82. [90]

    Momentum-dependent interfacial tension in polymer solutions

    Milchev, A.; Binder, K. Momentum-dependent interfacial tension in polymer solutions. Europhysics Letters 2002, 59, 81, DOI: doi:10.1209/epl/i2002-00162-1

  83. [91]

    Carelli, C.; Jones, R. A. L.; Young, R. N.; Cubitt, R.; Dalliesh, R.; Schmid, F.; Sferrazza, M. Approaching criticality in polymer-polymer systems. Physical Review E 2005, 72, 031807, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031807

  84. [92]

    The surface tension of solids

    Shuttleworth, R. The surface tension of solids. Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sec A 1950, 63, 444

  85. [93]

    H.; Snoeijer, J

    Weijs, J. H.; Snoeijer, J. H.; Andreotti, B. Capillarity of soft amorphous solids: A microscopic model for surface stress. Physical Review E 2014, 89, 042408, DOI: doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042408

  86. [94]

    Andreotti, B.; Snoeijer, J. H. In Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics; Davis, S., Moin, P., Eds.; 2020; Vol. 52; pp 285--308, DOI: doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060147

  87. [95]

    Theory of block copolymer interfaces in the strong segregation limit

    Semenov, A. Theory of block copolymer interfaces in the strong segregation limit. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 6617--6621, DOI: doi:10.1021/ma00076a047

  88. [96]

    Anomalous size-dependence of interfacial profiles between coexisting phases of polymer mixtures in thin-film geometry: A Monte Carlo simulation

    Werner, A.; Schmid, F.; Muller, M.; Binder, K. Anomalous size-dependence of interfacial profiles between coexisting phases of polymer mixtures in thin-film geometry: A Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Chemical Physics 1997, 107, 8175--8188, DOI: doi:10.1063/1.475118

  89. [97]

    Interfacial Properties of Active-Passive Polymer Mixtures

    Smrek, J.; Kremer, K. Interfacial Properties of Active-Passive Polymer Mixtures. Entropy 2018, 20, DOI: doi:10.3390/e20070520

  90. [98]

    Annual Reviews of Computational Physics VI; World Scientific, 1999; pp 59--127, DOI: doi:10.1142/9789812815569_0003

    Muller, M.; Schmid, F. Annual Reviews of Computational Physics VI; World Scientific, 1999; pp 59--127, DOI: doi:10.1142/9789812815569_0003

  91. [99]

    Characteristic Time and Length Scales in Melts of Kremer-Grest Bead-Spring Polymers with Wormlike Bending Stiffness

    Svaneborg, C.; Everaers, R. Characteristic Time and Length Scales in Melts of Kremer-Grest Bead-Spring Polymers with Wormlike Bending Stiffness. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 1917--1941, DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02437

  92. [100]

    A.; de Silva, B

    Kaptanoglu, A. A.; de Silva, B. M.; Fasel, U.; Kaheman, K.; Goldschmidt, A. J.; Callaham, J.; Delahunt, C. B.; Nicolaou, Z. G.; Champion, K.; Loiseau, J.-C.; Kutz, J. N.; Brunton, S. L. PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identification. Journal of...

  93. [101]

    statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python

    Seabold, S.; Perktold, J. statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. 9th Python in Science Conference. 2010

  94. [102]

    at Mainz, Staudingerweg 7-9, 55128 Mainz, Germany Torsten Gereon Linder Department of chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit\

    Ardell, A. J. Gradient energy, interfacial energy and interface width. Scripta Materialia 2012, 66, 423--426, DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.043 mcitethebibliography ms.tex0000664000000000000000000022676314727663770010762 0ustar rootroot [journal=mamobx,...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.