Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

PyPotteryLens: An Open-Source Deep Learning Framework for Automated Digitisation of Archaeological Pottery Documentation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An open-source deep-learning framework digitizes archaeological pottery drawings at over 97% precision and recall.

desk verdict A useful open-source tool for pottery drawing digitisation, with solid detection results but a likely data leak in the classification validation split that inflates the headline numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11574 v1 pith:MANDLGA6 submitted 2024-12-16 cs.CV

Lorenzo Cardarelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords deeplearningarchaeologicalpotteryinstancesegmentationYOLOEfficientNetV2legacydatadigitalheritageopen-sourcesoftware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the laborious conversion of published pottery drawings into digital records can be automated without losing archaeological information. It introduces PyPotteryLens, an open-source pipeline that finds each vessel drawing on a scanned plate, cuts it out as a clean segmentation mask, classifies it as complete or fragmentary, standardizes its orientation, and exports the result as an image plus tabular metadata. The reported performance is precision and recall above 97% for detection and classification, with processing time reduced by 5× to 20× compared with manual recording, and the author argues that the approach generalizes to publications outside the training set. A reader should care because hundreds of thousands of legacy pottery illustrations are currently locked in print, and making them machine-readable would unlock larger comparative studies and new uses of deep learning in archaeology.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is YOLO instance segmentation, a single-shot network that predicts both boxes and per-pixel masks, fine-tuned on 4,097 manually annotated pottery instances from 13 Italian publications, paired with a custom multi-head EfficientNetV2 classifier, a shared convolutional backbone with three specialized classification heads, trained on 18,252 augmented images that cover all completeness and orientation combinations. The YOLO model makes clean contour extraction possible, and the multi-head classifier standardizes orientation and completeness. Around these models, a browser-based graphical interface keeps a human in the loop for correction and validation, and a self-annotation module writes corrected masks back into YOLO training format, closing a feedback loop that is meant to let the detector improve on each user's own publication styles.

What would settle it

Run the released models on a complete previously unpublished pottery plate from a region and artistic tradition well outside the training corpus, with ground-truth masks drawn by an independent archaeologist, and compute per-page precision and recall; the generalization claim is falsified if either metric falls clearly below the claimed 97% on an ordinary page, or if the model systematically attaches vessel contours to scale bars, shading, or other non-vessel elements. A minimal version of the same test is to publish numeric mAP, precision, and recall for the two extra-training contexts (Morel 1981; Dyrdahl and Montalvo 2022) rather than boxplot positions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single-class, segmentation-first deep-learning pipeline can be a practical digitization tool for archaeological pottery, not just a research prototype. Rather than returning bounding boxes, the YOLO model traces the outline of each pottery drawing, so decorations and non-vessel elements are excluded from the extracted record; a multi-head EfficientNetV2 classifier then assigns each extracted vessel a completeness label (ENT/FRAG) and two orientation labels (TOP/BOTTOM, LEFT/RIGHT), so every record is presented consistently. The paper reports mAP50 near 0.99 for detection, segmentation precision and recall above 0.96, classification precision and recall above 0.98, and a speed-up of 4.7× on the full Ponte Nuovo workflow, or about 20× when tabular data entry is excluded. The Osteria dell'Osa demonstration is offered as evidence that the standardized output is clean enough to train an unsupervised variational autoencoder that clusters over 2,300 drawings in about half an hour.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two publications not used in training are representative enough of diverse archaeological contexts and were labelled as reliably as the training data; the paper does not report numeric per-context metrics for them, and it concedes that unusual publication styles can make the model learn style rather than pottery.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Legacy pottery plates can be bulk-processed into per-vessel image files with associated metadata, turning print-only corpora into queryable digital archives.
  • The archaeologist's role shifts from tracing and cutting out drawings to verifying and correcting machine output, with the paper reporting the largest time gains in report generation, post-processing, and card creation.
  • Extracted masks can be recycled as training data through the self-annotation module, allowing the detector to be fine-tuned on a user's own materials and publication styles.
  • Standardized, clean vessel images are directly usable as training input for other machine-learning analyses; the paper demonstrates this with an unsupervised VAE that clusters over 2,300 pottery drawings in about half an hour.
  • The modular design means the same pipeline of document processing, segmentation, classification, and export can be retrained for other artifact classes such as lithics or metal objects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is that a third out-of-corpus evaluation on a non-Western or non-Mediterranean publication tradition would be the strongest stress test, since the two current extra-training contexts are limited in number and are reported without per-context numeric precision or recall.
  • The self-annotation feedback loop could amplify an annotator's systematic blind spots: a model fine-tuned on user-corrected masks learns what the user chose to correct, not necessarily what is true.
  • Because the pipeline already outputs clean object masks rather than boxes, a natural next step not taken in the paper is to compute morphological vessel measurements directly from the masks, turning the digitization tool into a quantitative metrology tool.
  • The reported speed-up is measured against one experienced manual recorder, so the practical gain will vary with the user's manual proficiency and the structure of the source publication.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PyPotteryLens, an open-source deep-learning framework for automatically detecting, segmenting, classifying, and digitising archaeological pottery drawings from legacy publications. The system combines YOLOv8/YOLOv11 instance segmentation with a multi-head EfficientNetV2 classifier and a Gradio-based user interface, plus a self-annotation module. The authors report detection/segmentation precision and recall near 97% on a validation set, classification precision and recall above 98%, a 4.7× to 20× reduction in processing time compared to manual recording in a single case study, and qualitative evidence of generalisation to two publications outside the training set.

Significance. If the reported performance holds up, this is a practically useful contribution to digital heritage and computational archaeology: it addresses a real bottleneck (legacy pottery drawings locked in printed publications), provides an open-source and modular tool with a UI aimed at non-programmers, and includes a self-annotation loop that can generate further training data. The time-saving and standardised-output aspects are directly relevant to archaeology workflows. The paper also ships code, documentation, and models on GitHub/HuggingFace, which supports reproducibility. The two external-context tests, while limited, are a commendable step beyond simple within-corpus validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2.2, Table 3] The classifier training/validation split is ambiguous and potentially leaky. The text states that 4,563 base instances are manually augmented to 8 configurations each, giving 18,252 examples, and then "80% of the images are used for training and the remaining 20% for validation." If the 80/20 split was applied over the 18,252 augmented images (as the phrasing suggests), the same original vessel will appear in both training and validation in different orientations, and the near-99% classification metrics in Table 3 would partly reflect recognition of already-seen vessels rather than classification of unseen pottery. Please clarify whether the split was stratified by base instance (or by publication) and report the number of distinct base vessels in each fold. This is load-bearing for the abstract's classification accuracy claim.
  2. [§4.1, Figure 7] The generalisation claim is not supported by the reported numbers. Section 4.1 states that the model's performance on the two extra-training contexts (Morel 1981; Dyrdahl and Montalvo 2022) "aligned closely with training results," but these contexts appear only as individual points on boxplots (Figure 7) with no numeric mAP, precision, or recall values. Without quantitative results for these two external publications, the assertion of "robust generalisation capabilities" in the Abstract is unsubstantiated. Please provide the actual metric values for each external context, or explicitly mark them as qualitative observations.
  3. [§4.3.1, Abstract] The time-saving claim is inconsistent with the reported overall speed-up. The Abstract states that the framework reduces processing time "by up to 5× to 20×," but Section 4.3.1 reports that the overall speed-up for the Ponte Nuovo case study was 4.7×, with 20× achieved only after excluding the Tabular information input phase. The lower bound of the claimed range (5×) is not met by the overall measured value. Please reconcile these numbers and present the speed-up as a range of per-step speed-ups, with the overall 4.7× clearly distinguished from the conditional 20× figure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] The statement "YOLOv8 has a higher Precision than YOLOv11 (≈ 10%)" is numerically wrong: Table 2 shows box precision 0.972 vs. 0.966, a difference of about 0.6 percentage points, not 10%. Please correct this to avoid misleading readers.
  2. [§4.1, Figure 7] The boxplots in Figure 7 are described as showing "model's validation performance metrics," but the figure caption does not specify what the boxes represent (e.g., per-page metrics, per-publication metrics, or per-annotation metrics). Adding axis labels and a clear caption would improve interpretability.
  3. [§3.4] The section heading reads "Harware and Software used"; this should be "Hardware and Software used."
  4. [§3.2.3] The self-annotation module is described as enabling "self-training," but it is actually a manual-correction-plus-export workflow that produces new training data for later fine-tuning. Using a term like "human-in-the-loop annotation" or "iterative re-training" would be more accurate and avoid confusion with self-supervised learning.
  5. [§4.3.2] The VAE case study is presented as a demonstration, but the architecture description is sparse (only the loss and β value are given). Since the paper does not claim this as a central contribution, a brief sentence pointing to a repository or prior publication would suffice.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Classification validation split over augmented images makes the reported >97% classification metrics a recognition of training vessels rather than a prediction on new data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2.2 (training split) and Section 4.2 (validation metrics)]
    "These base images are manually augmented to account for all possible orientation combinations (e.g., FRAG-TOP-RIGHT, FRAG-TOP-LEFT), resulting in 8 distinct configurations per instance and a comprehensive training set of 18,252 examples. In this training, 80% of the images are used for training and the remaining 20% for validation."

    The validation split is described as over the 18,252 augmented images, not over the 4,563 base instances. Since each base instance contributes 8 augmented images, a random 80/20 split over images places, with near-certainty, augmented versions of the same original drawing in both training and validation. The reported ~99% validation accuracy (Table 3) therefore measures the model's ability to classify already-seen vessels under different orientations, not its ability to classify new pottery. The claimed 'robust classification reliability' and the abstract's 'over 97% precision and recall in classification tasks' reduce to recognition of the training data by construction.

full rationale

The detection and segmentation evaluation uses a held-out 20% split of annotated pages and an external test on two publications (Morel 1981; Dyrdahl and Montalvo 2022), so that part is self-contained. The classification evaluation, however, is described as partitioning the 18,252 augmented images without stratifying by the 4,563 base instances from which they are derived. Under that described procedure, validation images share their source drawing with training images, so the near-100% validation accuracy (Table 3) is not an out-of-sample prediction but a recognition of augmented copies of training vessels. This partially undermines the abstract's combined >97% claim, though the detection component remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This paper's central claims are empirical, not derivational, so the ledger contains no invented physical entities. The main 'free parameters' are an unstated inference threshold and trained model checkpoints whose exact values or hashes are not given. The load-bearing assumptions are about annotation quality, the sufficiency of two external test contexts, and the representativeness of a single timing experiment.

free parameters (5)
  • YOLOv8/YOLOv11 trained weights = checkpoints on HuggingFace (path not specified in paper)
    All detection and segmentation metrics in Table 2 are properties of these fitted weights; the paper does not report parameter counts, seeds, or exact checkpoint hashes.
  • EfficientNetV2 multi-head classifier weights = not reported in paper
    Classification metrics in Table 3 depend on these trained weights; exact training configuration is only partially documented.
  • YOLO inference confidence threshold = not reported; described as user-adjustable
    Precision and recall are operating-point dependent; the reported single values do not mention the threshold used.
  • Classifier augmentation multiplier = 8 configurations per instance
    The 18,252 training examples are generated by manual augmentation; classification difficulty is reduced because orientation labels are directly tied to the geometric transforms.
  • VAE beta and latent dimension = beta=0.00025, latent=128
    Chosen by hand for the Osteria dell'Osa demonstration; does not affect the main digitisation claims.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 4,097 manual annotations from 13 publications are correct and representative of pottery drawings in Italian protohistoric publications.
    Invoked in Section 3.2.1; if labels are noisy or style-biased, the reported detection quality and generalization do not hold.
  • domain assumption The extra-training contexts (Morel 1981; Dyrdahl and Montalvo 2022) provide reliable ground truth for out-of-distribution evaluation.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 and Figure 7; the paper gives no numeric scores or annotation protocol for these contexts.
  • domain assumption The 8 augmented orientation labels (FRAG-TOP-LEFT etc.) are semantically valid and the classifier learns vessel orientation rather than image orientation.
    Section 3.2.2; a classifier can trivially learn the geometric transform applied, making the high orientation accuracy uninformative about pottery content.
  • standard math The YOLO framework's implementation of IoU, mAP, precision, and recall is correct.
    Equations 1 to 5 define the metrics; correctness is assumed from the library implementation, not verified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The single Ponte Nuovo timing session is representative of expert manual and automated workflows.
    Section 4.3.1; the author runs both sides of the comparison, with no independent users or repetitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PyPotteryLens: An Open-Source Deep Learning Framework for Automated Digitisation of Archaeological Pottery Documentation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MANDLGA6

@misc{pith2026241211574,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PyPotteryLens: An Open-Source Deep Learning Framework for Automated Digitisation of Archaeological Pottery Documentation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MANDLGA6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11574}
}
read the original abstract

Archaeological pottery documentation and study represents a crucial but time-consuming aspect of archaeology. While recent years have seen advances in digital documentation methods, vast amounts of legacy data remain locked in traditional publications. This paper introduces PyPotteryLens, an open-source framework that leverages deep learning to automate the digitisation and processing of archaeological pottery drawings from published sources. The system combines state-of-the-art computer vision models (YOLO for instance segmentation and EfficientNetV2 for classification) with an intuitive user interface, making advanced digital methods accessible to archaeologists regardless of technical expertise. The framework achieves over 97\% precision and recall in pottery detection and classification tasks, while reducing processing time by up to 5x to 20x compared to manual methods. Testing across diverse archaeological contexts demonstrates robust generalisation capabilities. Also, the system's modular architecture facilitates extension to other archaeological materials, while its standardised output format ensures long-term preservation and reusability of digitised data as well as solid basis for training machine learning algorithms. The software, documentation, and examples are available on GitHub (https://github.com/lrncrd/PyPottery/tree/PyPotteryLens).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11574 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Object detection (left) versus instance segmentation (right). The example illustrates the principal benefits of the segmentation approach, which enables the removal of each element that falls outside the target area. Example by Moretti et al. (1963). 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic diagram shows the workflow of the proposed system. Made with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An annotated page by Parise Badoni and Ruggeri Giove (1980) using the software [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Some examples of the styles used in the representation of archaeological ceramics. From left to right: Bianco [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A plot showing how new training data is created by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The user interface of PyPotteryLens. The tab for manual control of segmentation masks is shown. In this analysis two key mAP variants are evaluated: mAP50 (Equation 2) : This metric considers detections to be successful if they achieve at least 50% IoU with ground trut…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Series of boxplots showing model’s validation performance metrics. Specific extra-training set contexts are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Series of plot showing different classification performance metrics, including Loss and Accuracy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Confusion matrices for validation set and, more generally, for the integration of DL techniques into archaeological research. All the experiments are performed on a desktop PC with an Intel i7-12700K CPU and 32GB of RAM. 4.3.1 Comparison with manual recording: Ponte Nu…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Barplot showing execution time (s) for each task [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 2D embedding of the learned latent space. Clear groupings are visible and structured in an interpretable way. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: k-nearest neighbors of selected samples. Neighbors suggest clear morphological similarity analysis, enhancing the quality of archaeological research. The inclusion of manual correction tools for both vision and classification models ensure that archaeological expertis…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abid, Abubakar, Ali Abdalla, Ali Abid, Dawood Khan, Abdulrahman Alfozan, and James Zou. 2019. ``Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wild.'' https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.02569

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02569 2019

  2. [2]

    Adams, William Y., and Ernest W. Adams. 1991. Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558207

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558207 1991

  3. [3]

    Allison, Penelope. 2008. ``Dealing with Legacy Data - an Introduction.'' Internet Archaeology, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.24.8

    work page doi:10.11141/ia.24.8 2008

  4. [4]

    Amini, Massih-Reza, Vasilii Feofanov, Loic Pauletto, Lies Hadjadj, Emilie Devijver, and Yury Maximov. 2024. ``Self-Training: A Survey.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.12040

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.12040 2024

  5. [5]

    Anichini, Francesca, Nachum Dershowitz, Nevio Dubbini, Gabriele Gattiglia, Barak Itkin, and Lior Wolf. 2021. ``The Automatic Recognition of Ceramics from Only One Photo: The ArchAIDE App.'' Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 36 (April): 102788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102788

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Bianco Peroni, Vera, Renato Peroni, and Alessandro Vanzetti. 2010. La Necropoli Del Bronzo Finale Di Pianello Di Genga. Grandi Contesti e Problemi Della Protostoria Italiana 13. Borgo San Lorenzo ( FI ) [ i.e. Florence, Italy ] : All'insegna del giglio

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Bickler, Simon H. 2021. ``Machine Learning Arrives in Archaeology.'' Advances in Archaeological Practice 9 (2): 186--91. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2021.6

    doi:10.1017/aap.2021.6 2021

  8. [8]

    Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria, ed. 1992. La Necropoli Laziale Di Osteria Dell'osa. Roma: Quasar

    work page 1992

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Orengo, and Iban Berganzo-Besga

    Buławka, Nazarij, Hector A. Orengo, and Iban Berganzo-Besga. 2024. ``Deep Learning-Based Detection of Qanat Underground Water Distribution Systems Using HEXAGON Spy Satellite Imagery.'' Journal of Archaeological Science 171 (November): 106053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2024.106053

    2024

  2. [10]

    Buranelli, F. 1983. La Necropoli Villanoviana "Le Rose" Di Tarquinia. Quaderni Del Centro Di Studio Per l'archeologia Etrusco-Italica 6

    1983

  3. [11]

    Cacciari, I., and G. F. Pocobelli. 2022. ``Machine Learning: A Novel Tool for Archaeology.'' In Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis, edited by Sebastiano D'Amico and Valentina Venuti, 961--1002. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60016-7_33

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Cardarelli, Andrea, and Luigi Malnati, eds. 2003. Atlante Dei Beni Archeologici Della Provincia Di Modena. Volume III . Collina e Alta Pianura, Tomo 2 . Firenze: All'insegna del giglio

    2003

  5. [13]

    Cardarelli, Lorenzo. 2022. ``A Deep Variational Convolutional Autoencoder for Unsupervised Features Extraction of Ceramic Profiles. A Case Study from Central Italy.'' Journal of Archaeological Science 144 (August): 105640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2022.105640

    2022

  6. [14]

    Caspari, Gino, and Pablo Crespo. 2019. ``Convolutional Neural Networks for Archaeological Site Detection -- Finding `Princely' Tombs.'' Journal of Archaeological Science 110 (October): 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.104998

    2019

  7. [15]

    Chiaramonte Treré, Cristina, and Vincenzo D'Ercole. 2003. La Necropoli Di Campovalanot. Ombe Orientalizzanti e Arcaiche. I. BAR 1177. Oxford: J.; E. Hedges

    2003

  8. [16]

    Chiaramonte Treré, Cristina, Vincenzo D'Ercole, Cecilia Scotti, and Giorgio Baratti, eds. 2010. La Necropoli Di Campovalano: Tombe Orientalizzanti e Arcaiche. II . BAR International Series 2174. Oxford: Archaeopress

    2010

  9. [17]

    Clarke, David L. 1968. Analytical Archaeology. London: Routledge

    1968

  10. [18]

    Cosentino, Serena, Vincenzo D'Ercole, and Gianfranco Mieli, eds. 2001. La Necropoli Di Fossa. Vol. 1: Le Testimonianze Più Antiche. Documenti Dell'abruzzo Antico. Pescara: Carsa

    2001

  11. [19]

    ---------. 2004. La Necropoli Di Fossa. Vol. 2: I Corredi Orientalizzanti e Arcaici. Pescara: Carsa

    2004

  12. [20]

    Omer, Cunlin Zhang, Qunxi Zhang, Yirong Ma, Zhiyang Zhang, et al

    Cui, Jingwen, Ning Tao, Akam M. Omer, Cunlin Zhang, Qunxi Zhang, Yirong Ma, Zhiyang Zhang, et al. 2024. ``Attention-Enhanced u-Net for Automatic Crack Detection in Ancient Murals Using Optical Pulsed Thermography.'' Journal of Cultural Heritage 70 (November): 111--19. https://...

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    D'Orazio, Marco, Andrea Gianangeli, Francesco Monni, and Enrico Quagliarini. 2024. ``Automatic Monitoring of the Biocolonisation of Historical Building's Facades Through Convolutional Neural Networks ( CNN ).'' Journal of Cultural Heritage 70 (November): 80--89. https://doi.or...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Roosevelt

    Demján, Peter, Peter Pavúk, and Christopher H. Roosevelt. 2023. ``Laser-Aided Profile Measurement and Cluster Analysis of Ceramic Shapes.'' Journal of Field Archaeology 48 (1): 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2022.2128549

    2023

  15. [23]

    Dosovitskiy, Alexey, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, et al. 2021. ``An Image Is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929

    2021 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dumoulin, Vincent, Jonathon Shlens, and Manjunath Kudlur. 2017. ``A Learned Representation for Artistic Style.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.07629

    2017 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dyrdahl, Eric, and Carlos Montalvo. 2022. ``Insights into a First Millennium BC (800 -- 400 Cal BC ) Social Network: Excavations at Las Orquídeas in the Northern Ecuadorian Sierra.'' Journal of Global Archaeology, February, § 1--78 Seiten. https://doi.org/10.34780/CYAS-A0WB

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Emmitt, Joshua, Sina Masoud-Ansari, Rebecca Phillipps, Stacey Middleton, Jennifer Graydon, and Simon Holdaway. 2022. ``Machine Learning for Stone Artifact Identification: Distinguishing Worked Stone Artifacts from Natural Clasts Using Deep Neural Networks.'' Edited by Jyotismi...

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Rubat Borel

    Giaretti, M., and F. Rubat Borel. 2006. ``Le Strutture e i Reperti Archeologici.'' In Navigando Lungo l'eridano. La Necropoli Protogolasecchiana Di Morano Sul Po, edited by M. Venturino Gambari, 89--186

    2006

  20. [28]

    Gualandi, Maria Letizia, Gabriele Gattiglia, and Francesca Anichini. 2021. ``An Open System for Collection and Automatic Recognition of Pottery Through Neural Network Algorithms.'' Heritage 4 (1): 140--59. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4010008

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    He, Kaiming, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2015. ``Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.03385

    2015 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Jegham, Nidhal, Chan Young Koh, Marwan Abdelatti, and Abdeltawab Hendawi. 2024. ``Evaluating the Evolution of YOLO (You Only Look Once) Models: A Comprehensive Benchmark Study of YOLO 11 and Its Predecessors.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00201

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Jing, Yongcheng, Yezhou Yang, Zunlei Feng, Jingwen Ye, Yizhou Yu, and Mingli Song. 2018. ``Neural Style Transfer: A Review.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.04058

    2018 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Jocher, Glenn, Jing Qiu, and Ayush Chaurasia. 2023. ``Ultralytics YOLO .'' https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

    2023

  25. [33]

    Kingma, Diederik P., and Max Welling. 2013. ``Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114

    2013 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gorelik, Volker Heyd, Ralf Lämmel, Yoan Diekmann, and Maxime Brami

    Klein, Kevin, Alyssa Wohde, Alexander V. Gorelik, Volker Heyd, Ralf Lämmel, Yoan Diekmann, and Maxime Brami. 2024. `` AutArch : An AI -Assisted Workflow for Object Detection and Automated Recording in Archaeological Catalogues.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.17978

    2024 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Le, Quan, Luis Miralles-Pechuán, Shridhar Kulkarni, Jing Su, and Oisín Boydell. 2020. ``An Overview of Deep Learning in Industry.'' In Data Analytics and AI , by Jay Liebowitz, edited by Jay Liebowitz, 1st ed., 65--98. Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003019855-5

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Lodi, Andrea, Silvano Martello, and Daniele Vigo. 2002. ``Recent Advances on Two-Dimensional Bin Packing Problems.'' Discrete Applied Mathematics 123 (1): 379--96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(01)00347-X

    2002 doi

  29. [37]

    Maerten, Anne-Sofie, and Derya Soydaner. 2024. ``From Paintbrush to Pixel: A Review of Deep Neural Networks in AI -Generated Art.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.10913

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Mao, Anqi, Mehryar Mohri, and Yutao Zhong. 2023. ``Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07288

    2023 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Marwick, Ben, Jade D'Alpoim Guedes, C Michael Barton, Lynsey Bates, Michael Baxter, Andrew Bevan, Elizabeth Bollwerk, et al. 2017. ``Open Science in Archaeology.'' SAA Archaeological Record 17 (September): 8--14. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6XX

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    McInnes, Leland, John Healy, and James Melville. 2018. `` UMAP : Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction.'' arXiv :1802.03426 [ Cs, Stat ] . http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Morel, Jean-Paul. 1981. Céramique Campanienne: Les Formes. Bibliothèque Des Écoles Françaises d'athènes Et de Rome [ Ser. 1 ] 244. Roma: École Française

    1981

  34. [42]

    De Agostino, J

    Moretti, M., A. De Agostino, J. B. Ward-Perkins, R. Staccioli, A Vianello P., D. Ridgway, J. Close-Brooks, and M. T. Amorelli Falcioni. 1963. ``Veio (Isola Farnese). -- Scavi in Una Necropoli Villanoviana in Località «Quattro Fontanili».'' Notizie Degli Scavi Di Antichità XVII...

    1963

  35. [43]

    Navarro, Pablo, Celia Cintas, Manuel Lucena, José Manuel Fuertes, Claudio Delrieux, and Manuel Molinos. 2021. ``Learning Feature Representation of Iberian Ceramics with Automatic Classification Models.'' Journal of Cultural Heritage 48 (March): 65--73. https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Navarro, Pablo, Celia Cintas, Manuel Lucena, José Manuel Fuertes, Rafael Segura, Claudio Delrieux, and Rolando González-José. 2022. ``Reconstruction of Iberian Ceramic Potteries Using Generative Adversarial Networks.'' Scientific Reports 12 (1): 10644. https://doi.org/10.1038/...

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Orton, Clive, and Michael Hughes. 2013. Pottery in Archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    Pacciarelli, Marco. 1999. Torre Galli: La Necropoli Della Prima Età Del Ferro: Scavi Paolo Orsi, 1922-23. Studi e Testi. Soveria Mannelli (Catanzaro): Rubbettino

    1999

  39. [47]

    Ruggeri Giove

    Parise Badoni, F., and M. Ruggeri Giove. 1980. Alfedena, La Necropoli Di Campo Consolino. Scavi 1974-1979

    1980

  40. [48]

    Parisotto, Simone, Ninetta Leone, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, and Alessandro Launaro. 2022. ``Unsupervised Clustering of Roman Potsherds via Variational Autoencoders.'' Journal of Archaeological Science 142 (June): 105598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2022.105598

    2022

  41. [49]

    Perini, R. 1994. Scavi Archeologici Nella Zona Palafitticola Di Fiave'-Carrera. Parte III Campagne 1969-1976. Resti Della Cultura Materiale Ceramica

    1994

  42. [50]

    Pinder, David, Izumi Shimada, and David Gregory. 1979. ``The Nearest-Neighbor Statistic: Archaeological Application and New Developments.'' American Antiquity 44 (3): 430--45. https://doi.org/10.2307/279543

    1979 doi

  43. [51]

    Ramachandran, Prajit, Niki Parmar, Ashish Vaswani, Irwan Bello, Anselm Levskaya, and Jon Shlens. 2019. ``Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Models.'' In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2...

    2019

  44. [52]

    Ramesh, Aditya, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. ``Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.12092

    2021 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Read, Dwight W. 2009. Artifact Classification: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach. 1. paperback ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press

    2009

  46. [54]

    Redmon, Joseph, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. 2016. ``You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.02640

    2016 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    Albrecht, Hendrik F

    Sakai, Masato, Akihisa Sakurai, Siyuan Lu, Jorge Olano, Conrad M. Albrecht, Hendrik F. Hamann, and Marcus Freitag. 2024. `` AI -Accelerated Nazca Survey Nearly Doubles the Number of Known Figurative Geoglyphs and Sheds Light on Their Purpose.'' Proceedings of the National Acad...

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    Salzani, L., and Cecilia Colonna, eds. 2010. La Fragilità Dell'urna. I Recenti Scavi a Narde Necropoli Di Frattesina ( XII - IX Sec. A.c.), Catalogo Della Mostra

    2010

  49. [57]

    Salzani, Luciano. 2005. ``La Necropoli Protostorica Di Ponte Nuovo a Gazzo Veronese.'' Notizie Archeologiche Bergomensi 13: 7--111

    2005

  50. [58]

    Shepard, Anna Osler. 1985. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Repr. Publication / Carnegie Institution of Washington 609. Washington, DC : Carnegie Inst

    1985

  51. [59]

    Sinopoli, Carla M. 1991. Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. Boston, MA : Springer US . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9274-4

    1991 doi

  52. [60]

    Snow, Dean R. 2010. ``Making Legacy Literature and Data Accessible in Archaeology.'' Edited by B. Frischer, Webb Crawford, and D. Koller. Making History Interactive. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology ( CAA ). Proceedings of the 37th International Co...

    2010

  53. [61]

    Tan, Mingxing, and Quoc V. Le. 2021. `` EfficientNetV 2: Smaller Models and Faster Training.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.00298

    2021 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    Wada, Kentaro. 2024. ``Labelme: Image Polygonal Annotation with Python.'' https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5711226

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    Ward-Perkins, J. B., R. Staccioli, J. Close-Brooks, and A. Batchvarova. 1965. ``Veio (Isola Farnese). -- Continuazione Degli Scavi Nella Necropoli Villanoviana in Località «Quattro Fontanili».'' Notizie Degli Scavi Di Antichità XIX : 49--236

    1965

  56. [64]

    Weidig, Joachim, and Markus Egg. 2021. Bazzano -- Ein Gräberfeld Bei l'aquila (Abruzzen). Propylaeum. https://doi.org/10.11588/PROPYLAEUM.865

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    Zhao, Zhiyuan, Hengrui Kang, Bin Wang, and Conghui He. 2024. `` DocLayout - YOLO : Enhancing Document Layout Analysis Through Diverse Synthetic Data and Global-to-Local Adaptive Perception.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12628

    2024 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    princely

    Zhu, Jun-Yan, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A. Efros. 2020. ``Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks.'' arXiv . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.10593. CSLReferences document references.bib0000664000000000000000000023725514...

    2020 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.