Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

IDEA-Bench: How Far are Generative Models from Professional Designing?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.11767 v1 pith:FXA6INUS submitted 2024-12-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modeldesignidea-benchmodelstasksgenerativeimagesvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world design tasks - such as picture book creation, film storyboard development using character sets, photo retouching, visual effects, and font transfer - are highly diverse and complex, requiring deep interpretation and extraction of various elements from instructions, descriptions, and reference images. The resulting images often implicitly capture key features from references or user inputs, making it challenging to develop models that can effectively address such varied tasks. While existing visual generative models can produce high-quality images based on prompts, they face significant limitations in professional design scenarios that involve varied forms and multiple inputs and outputs, even when enhanced with adapters like ControlNets and LoRAs. To address this, we introduce IDEA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark encompassing 100 real-world design tasks, including rendering, visual effects, storyboarding, picture books, fonts, style-based, and identity-preserving generation, with 275 test cases to thoroughly evaluate a model's general-purpose generation capabilities. Notably, even the best-performing model only achieves 22.48 on IDEA-Bench, while the best general-purpose model only achieves 6.81. We provide a detailed analysis of these results, highlighting the inherent challenges and providing actionable directions for improvement. Additionally, we provide a subset of 18 representative tasks equipped with multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based auto-evaluation techniques to facilitate rapid model development and comparison. We releases the benchmark data, evaluation toolkits, and an online leaderboard at https://github.com/ali-vilab/IDEA-Bench, aiming to drive the advancement of generative models toward more versatile and applicable intelligent design systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MultiRef: Controllable Image Generation with Multiple Visual References

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MultiRef-bench shows that current image generators that accept multiple visual references still fail to combine them reliably, with the best tested model OmniGen reaching only 66.6% synthetic and 79.0% real-world alig...

  2. MADI: Masking-Augmented Diffusion with Inference-Time Scaling for Visual Editing

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A masking-augmented diffusion objective plus pause-token inference scaling modestly improves instruction adherence and source preservation for OmniGen-based image editing.

Pith tools