Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Entropy as a Design Principle in the Photosystem II Supercomplex

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Photosystem II reconciles efficient trapping and photoprotection by giving each protein subunit its own entropy–enthalpy driving profile, with entropy tunable through LHCII binding.

desk verdict New entropy decomposition of PSII dynamics is suggestive, but the disorder-averaging method undermines the quantitative claims; needs revision before the design-principle story can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12418 v1 pith:N7VOAJG4 submitted 2024-12-16 physics.chem-ph q-bio.BM

Johanna L. Hall , Shiun-Jr Yang , David T. Limmer , Graham R. Fleming This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phq-bio.BM
keywords photosystemIIexcitationenergytransferentropyfreelandscapeLHCIIantennanonphotochemicalquenchingpopulationcontractiontimestochasticthermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Photosystem II must do two opposing jobs: capture light with near-perfect efficiency and safely dissipate excess energy as heat. This paper argues that it accomplishes both by using entropy, not just energy, as a design variable. Simulating exciton relaxation on a structure-based rate matrix, the authors find that each protein subunit has a characteristic entropy–enthalpy balance: D1-side subunits drive directed, enthalpic transfer toward the reaction center, while D2-side and peripheral subunits spread excitations entropically, providing alternate pathways and inter-monomer routes. They further show that adding or removing LHCII antenna complexes tunes the entropic part of the free energy landscape, letting the complex adapt to light conditions. If correct, this reframes the flat PSII energy landscape as a feature rather than a puzzle.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a structure-based exciton rate matrix $\mathbf{K}$ built from the crystal structures of the C2S2 and C2S2M2 supercomplexes, with rates computed using quantum rate theory and organized into domains by coupling strength. Exciton populations evolve as $\mathbf{P}(t) = e^{\mathbf{K}t}\mathbf{P}(0)$, and because the rates satisfy detailed balance with respect to a Boltzmann distribution, the authors interpret the Shannon entropy of the population distribution as thermodynamic entropy. The free energy decomposition is $\Delta G(t) = \Delta H(t) - T\Delta S(t)$, and the population contraction time, defined as the time when entropy reaches its maximum, is the key observable used to classify subunits.

What would settle it

A direct test would be time-resolved fluorescence or two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy on PSII that checks whether energy transfer from an LHCII chlorophyll shows the predicted two-phase behavior, with sub-picosecond entropic spreading followed by contraction on the tens-of-picoseconds scale, and whether removing M-LHCII complexes changes inter-monomer trapping rates in the predicted direction when one reaction center is closed. A clear mismatch in those timescales or in the direction of the M-LHCII effect would falsify the claim that entropy differences among subunits are the controlling design variable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the free energy landscape of the PSII supercomplex is organized so that entropy and enthalpy play different, complementary roles in different protein subunits, and this division of labor reconciles efficient trapping with photoprotection. The paper computes, for each initial excitation, the time-dependent entropy change $\Delta S(t) = -k_B \sum_i p_i(t) \ln p_i(t)$ and enthalpy change $\Delta H(t) = \sum_i p_i(t) E_i - E(0)$, and finds two dynamical phases: an early entropy-driven phase in which population spreads among near-degenerate states, and a later enthalpy-driven contraction toward the reaction center. The time of maximum entropy (the population contraction time) varies by subunit: fast contraction with high same-monomer trapping for CP43, CP26, and S-LHCII on the D1 side; slower, bidirectional spreading for CP47, CP29, and M-LHCII on the D2 side; and long uphill excursions at Chls a 610 and 612 in LHCII, proposed nonphotochemical quenching sites. When one reaction center is closed, D1-side states in that monomer show disproportionately elongated contraction times, keeping excitations available to reach the other open RC. The authors conclude that the entropic component is not fixed but is dynamically regulated by LHCII binding, making entropy a tunable design principle.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Shannon entropy of the exciton population distribution is the true thermodynamic entropy of the transfer process; this requires the rates to obey detailed balance with a Boltzmann distribution and the dynamics to be effectively Markovian, so any substantial coherence or memory effects in real PSII would break the entropy-based conclusions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because each subunit has its own entropy–enthalpy balance, PSII does not need an energy funnel; the flat landscape works through subunit-specific driving forces.
  • Plants can dynamically retune the entropy component by adding or removing LHCII complexes, changing connectivity and inter-monomer transfer without changing pigment energies.
  • Closing one reaction center does not cripple trapping: D1-side excitations in the closed monomer slow down, leaving more time to reach the other open RC, and the slowest population contraction stays below the fluorescence lifetime.
  • The long-lived uphill states at Chls a 610 and 612 in LHCII provide a concrete molecular target for nonphotochemical quenching.
  • Artificial light-harvesting designs can use these principles: fast directed pathways for trapping, plus redundant entropy-rich pathways for backup under variable conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the entropy-dominated spreading phase is a general strategy for robustness: any energy transfer network with many near-degenerate states could use entropy to maintain multiple pathways when one route is blocked.
  • The population contraction time could serve as a practical design metric for artificial systems, screening architectures for fast contraction under normal operation and slow contraction under stress.
  • Because the entropy term is derived from the probability distribution, the framework naturally connects to information-theoretic measures such as entropy production or mutual information between excitation and trap state.
  • A testable extension would be to mutate or reconstitute PSII with altered LHCII stoichiometry and measure whether the predicted shifts in population contraction times and same-monomer trapping probabilities appear in fluorescence kinetics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs structure-based rate matrices for the C2S2M2 and C2S2 Photosystem II supercomplexes, solves the resulting master equation for excitation population dynamics, and computes time-dependent changes in Shannon entropy and enthalpy for many initial excitation conditions. From these calculations the authors define a population contraction time and argue that different protein subunits play distinct functional roles: D1-side subunits direct energy toward the reaction center, D2-side subunits support bidirectional inter-monomer energy flow, and LHCII binding tunes the entropic character of the energy landscape. The central claims are that entropy is a design principle in PSII and that subunit-specific entropy/enthalpy balances enable both efficient trapping and photoprotection.

Significance. If the calculations are correct, the paper would provide a useful conceptual framework for interpreting PSII's flat energy landscape and would connect stochastic-thermodynamic quantities to structural biology. The strengths of the manuscript include its use of high-resolution structures, explicit comparison of C2S2M2 and C2S2 complexes, treatment of open and closed reaction centers, and the public availability of the rate-matrix construction code. However, the central quantitative results are computed from a single disorder-averaged rate matrix rather than from ensemble-averaged dynamics, and the interpretation of the Shannon entropy as a thermodynamic entropy is not fully justified. These issues affect the load-bearing comparisons across subunits and between complexes, so the design-principle conclusions are not yet supported in their present form.

major comments (2)
  1. [II.A and Eq. (1)] The calculation of entropy uses the Shannon entropy of the exciton population distribution, S = -k_B sum_i p_i ln p_i, and the paper interprets this as the thermodynamic entropy in the free-energy decomposition of Eq. (2). The statement that the rates satisfy detailed balance with respect to a Boltzmann distribution is a consistency condition on the rate matrix, but it does not by itself establish that this population Shannon entropy equals the thermodynamic entropy of the exciton-phonon system; coherences, bath entropy, and non-Markovian effects are omitted. Since the paper's title and main conclusions are about entropy as a thermodynamic design principle, this identification needs either a derivation or an explicit statement that the quantity is a configurational entropy of the population distribution whose thermodynamic interpretation is an assumption.
  2. [III, Figs. 3-5 and Section II.A] The classification of subunits into D1-side directed trappers, D2-side bidirectional spreaders, and LHCII-mediated inter-monomer connectors is based on site-resolved population contraction times and same-monomer trapping probabilities computed from the single averaged rate matrix. Because disorder affects connectivity and trapping probabilities nonlinearly, these classifications could change under proper ensemble averaging. The paper should report per-realization statistics for contraction times and trapping probabilities, and the qualitative design conclusions should be shown to be robust to the disorder-averaging procedure before being presented as general design principles.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IV] The beginning of the Concluding Remarks contains the typo 'rIn' instead of 'In'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says 'In order of A-E, excitations are localized in...' but the figure contains panels A-H; the text should say A-H.
  3. [III] The phrase 'Chls a 610 and 612 of the LHCII (B) complexes' should be 'Chl a 610 and Chl a 612' for grammatical consistency.
  4. [III, Fig. S5] The text calls an R^2 value of 0.68 'not a very strongly correlated relationship'; this wording is surprising because 0.68 is usually considered a moderate-to-strong correlation, and the conclusion would be clearer if the authors stated the quantitative threshold they use.
  5. [II.A] The notation C2S2M2 appears with inconsistent spacing (e.g., 'C 2S2M2' in several places); please standardize throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: entropy and enthalpy are post-processing functionals of populations computed from a structure-based rate matrix; subunit comparisons are nontrivial outputs, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with crystal structures (5XNL, 3JCU), literature Hamiltonians, and the Modified Redfield/Generalized Forster rate-construction formalism, producing a rate matrix K. All reported quantities—ΔH(t)=Σ p_i(t)E_i − H(0), ΔS(t)=−k_BΣ p_i(t)ln p_i(t)+S(0), and the population contraction time defined as the entropy maximum—are computed by direct integration P(t)=e^{Kt}P(0) and are therefore model outputs, not fitted inputs or renamed targets. The subunit-specific design claims follow from comparing these outputs across initial conditions and across the C2S2M2 and C2S2 structures; for example, CP43 is computed to have a 13 ps average contraction time and 81% same-monomer trapping while CP47 has 24 ps and 59%, which is a non-tautological consequence of the connectivity of K. Self-citations (refs 12, 16, 32, 33) supply the rate-matrix construction and the stochastic-thermodynamic language, but the rate matrices are anchored to external structures and Hamiltonians and are checked against experimental D1/D2-side trapping trends (refs 13, 38, 39), so these citations are supporting evidence rather than circular premises. The disorder-averaging procedure described in Methods (averaging 500 rate matrices and propagating e^{⟨K⟩t}) is a modeling approximation that could bias entropy magnitudes, but this is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circularity: the contraction times and entropy curves are not defined in terms of the conclusions they are used to support. No step in the paper reduces a prediction to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the rate matrix model inherited from prior work, plus a set of interpretive assumptions about entropy and detailed balance. No new physical entities are introduced, and only the trap rate is a hand-chosen parameter in the present study.

free parameters (1)
  • Phenomenological RC trap rate = Not specified in main text
    Used to model open reaction centers as an irreversible sink; the rate value is taken from prior modeling work but not stated in the main text.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The rates satisfy detailed balance with respect to a Boltzmann distribution of each excitonic state
    Invoked in Methods to justify the thermodynamic interpretation of the master equation. If the real system has coherent or non-equilibrium effects, the free energy decomposition may not be exact.
  • domain assumption The Shannon entropy of the exciton population distribution equals the thermodynamic entropy
    The paper computes ΔS = -k_B Σ p_i ln p_i and treats it as the entropy in ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. This is an approximation for a quantum system; the exciton basis population entropy is not the full von Neumann entropy.
  • ad hoc to paper Averaging the 500 rate matrices before computing entropy is equivalent to ensemble averaging the entropy
    The paper states the entropy is based on the averaged rate matrix. This is a methodological choice that may not preserve the distribution of entropies across disorder realizations.
  • domain assumption An initial excitation is defined as the exciton state most localized in a given chlorophyll
    Used to map site-specific excitation to the exciton basis; the mapping is non-unique for delocalized states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entropy as a Design Principle in the Photosystem II Supercomplex." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N7VOAJG4

@misc{pith2026241212418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entropy as a Design Principle in the Photosystem II Supercomplex},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N7VOAJG4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12418}
}
read the original abstract

Photosystem II (PSII) can achieve near-unity quantum efficiency of light harvesting in ideal conditions and can dissipate excess light energy as heat to prevent formation of reactive oxygen species under light stress. Understanding how this pigment-protein complex accomplishes these opposing goals is a topic of great interest that has so far been explored primarily through the lens of the system energetics. Despite PSII's known flat energy landscape, a thorough consideration of the entropic effects on energy transfer in PSII is lacking. In this work, we aim to discern the free energetic design principles underlying the PSII energy transfer network. To accomplish this goal, we employ a structure-based rate matrix and compute the free energy terms in time following a specific initial excitation to discern how entropy and enthalpy drive ensemble system dynamics. We find that the interplay between the entropy and enthalpy components differs among each protein subunit, which allows each subunit to fulfill a unique role in the energy transfer network. This individuality ensures PSII can accomplish efficient energy trapping in the RC, effective NPQ in the periphery, and robust energy trapping in the other-monomer RC if the same-monomer RC is closed. We also show that entropy, in particular, is a dynamically tunable feature of the PSII free energy landscape accomplished through regulation of LHCII binding. These findings help rationalize natural photosynthesis and provide design principles for novel, more efficient solar energy harvesting technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12418 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The pigment arrangement of the C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Entropy (solid line) and enthalpy (dashed line) components of the free energy change in time for initial excitations at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Population contraction time for each initial excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Probability that an initial excitation will be trapped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Population contraction times for the C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Physical Observers and Quantum Reconstructions

    quant-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a 'least self-impediment' principle showing that minimizing dissipation leads observers to retain only predictive information, supporting a core premise of relational quantum mechanics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. E. Blankenship, Molecular Mechanisms of Photosyn- thesis, 3rd edition (Wiley, Hoboken, 2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Wientjes, H

    E. Wientjes, H. Van Amerongen, and R. Croce, Quantum yield of charge separation in photosystem ii: Functional effect of changes in the antenna size upon light acclima- tion, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117, 11200 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Van Mieghem et al

    F. Van Mieghem et al. , Charge recombination reactions in photosystem ii. 1. yields, recombination pathways, and kinetics of the primary pair, Biochemistry 34, 4798 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    M”uller, X.-P

    P. M”uller, X.-P. Li, and K. K. Niyogi, Non- photochemical quenching. a response to excess light en- ergy, Plant Physiology 125, 1558 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    J. R. Durrant, L. B. Giorgi, J. Barber, D. R. Klug, and G. Porter, Characterisation of triplet states in isolated photosystem ii reaction centres: Oxygen quenching as a mechanism for photodamage, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1017, 167 (1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    Krieger-Liszkay, Singlet oxygen production in pho- tosynthesis, Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 337 (2004)

    A. Krieger-Liszkay, Singlet oxygen production in pho- tosynthesis, Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 337 (2004). 8

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    A. V. Ruban, Nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: Mechanism and effectiveness in protecting plants from photodamage, Plant Physiology 170, 1903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Ishikita, B

    H. Ishikita, B. Loll, J. Biesiadka, W. Saenger, and E.-W. Knapp, Redox potentials of chlorophylls in the photosys- tem ii reaction center, Biochemistry 44, 4118 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Genty, J.-M

    B. Genty, J.-M. Briantais, and N. R. Baker, The rela- tionship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluores- cence, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 990, 87 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    A. V. Ruban and S. Wilson, The mechanism of non- photochemical quenching in plants: Localization and driving forces, Plant Cell Physiology 62, 1063 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Mirkovic et al

    T. Mirkovic et al. , Light absorption and energy transfer in the antenna complexes of photosynthetic organisms, Chemical Reviews 117, 249 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    S.-J. Yang, D. J. Wales, E. J. Woods, and G. R. Fleming, Design principles for energy transfer in the photosystem ii supercomplex from kinetic transition networks, Nature Communications 15, 8763 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Leonardo et al., Bidirectional energy flow in the photo- system ii supercomplex, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry B 128, 7941 (2024)

    C. Leonardo et al., Bidirectional energy flow in the photo- system ii supercomplex, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry B 128, 7941 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    R. C. Jennings et al. , A study of photosystem ii fluo- rescence emission in terms of the antenna chlorophyll- protein complexes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioen- erg. 1183, 194 (1993)

    1993

  7. [15]

    R. C. Jennings, R. Bassi, F. M. Garlaschi, P. Dainese, and G. Zucchelli, Distribution of the chlorophyll spectral forms in the chlorophyll-protein complexes of photosys- tem ii antenna, Biochemistry 32, 3203 (1993)

    1993

  8. [16]

    D. I. G. Bennett, K. Amarnath, and G. R. Fleming, A structure-based model of energy transfer reveals the principles of light harvesting in photosystem ii supercom- plexes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9164 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Shibata, S

    Y. Shibata, S. Nishi, K. Kawakami, J.-R. Shen, and T. Renger, Photosystem ii does not possess a simple ex- citation energy funnel: Time-resolved fluorescence spec- troscopy meets theory, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 6903 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Croce and H

    R. Croce and H. Van Amerongen, Natural strategies for photosynthetic light harvesting, Nat. Chem. Biol.10, 492 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Wei et al

    X. Wei et al. , Structure of spinach photosystem ii–lhcii supercomplex at 3.2 ˚A resolution, Nature 534, 69 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Su et al., Structure and assembly mechanism of plant c2 s2 m2-type psii-lhcii supercomplex, Science 357, 815 (2017)

    X. Su et al., Structure and assembly mechanism of plant c2 s2 m2-type psii-lhcii supercomplex, Science 357, 815 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Ballottari, J

    M. Ballottari, J. Girardon, L. Dall’Osto, and R. Bassi, Evolution and functional properties of photosystem ii light harvesting complexes in eukaryotes, Biochim. Bio- phys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1817, 143 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    E. J. Boekema, H. Van Roon, F. Calkoen, R. Bassi, and J. P. Dekker, Multiple types of association of photosys- tem ii and its light-harvesting antenna in partially solubi- lized photosystem ii membranes, Biochemistry 38, 2233 (1999)

    1999

  15. [23]

    E. J. Boekema, H. Van Roon, J. F. L. Van Breemen, and J. P. Dekker, Supramolecular organization of pho- tosystem ii and its light-harvesting antenna in partially solubilized photosystem ii membranes, Eur. J. Biochem. 266, 444 (1999)

    1999

  16. [24]

    Caffarri, R

    S. Caffarri, R. Kouˇ ril, S. Kere ¨ ıche, E. J. Boekema, and R. Croce, Functional architecture of higher plant photo- system ii supercomplexes, EMBO J. 28, 3052 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Crepin and S

    A. Crepin and S. Caffarri, Functions and evolution of lhcb isoforms composing lhcii, the major light harvesting complex of photosystem ii of green eukaryotic organisms, Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 19, 699 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    J. P. Dekker and E. J. Boekema, Supramolecular organi- zation of thylakoid membrane proteins in green plants, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1706, 12 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Raszewski and T

    G. Raszewski and T. Renger, Light harvesting in photo- system ii core complexes is limited by the transfer to the trap: Can the core complex turn into a photoprotective mode?, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 4431 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Raszewski, W

    G. Raszewski, W. Saenger, and T. Renger, Theory of optical spectra of photosystem ii reaction centers: Loca- tion of the triplet state and the identity of the primary electron donor, Biophys. J. 88, 986 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    M¨ uh, M

    F. M¨ uh, M. E.-A. Madjet, and T. Renger, Structure- based simulation of linear optical spectra of the cp43 core antenna of photosystem ii, Photosynth. Res. 111, 87 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Mascoli, V

    V. Mascoli, V. Novoderezhkin, N. Liguori, P. Xu, and R. Croce, Design principles of solar light harvesting in plants: Functional architecture of the monomeric an- tenna cp29, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1861, 148156 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Novoderezhkin, A

    V. Novoderezhkin, A. Marin, and R. Van Grondelle, Intra- and inter-monomeric transfers in the light har- vesting lhcii complex: the redfield–f¨ orster picture, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17093 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Yang and G

    M. Yang and G. R. Fleming, Influence of phonons on exciton transfer dynamics: comparison of the redfield, f¨ orster, and modified redfield equations, Chem. Phys. 275, 355 (2002)

    2002

  25. [33]

    D. T. Limmer, Statistical Mechanics and Stochastic Ther- modynamics: A Textbook on Modern Approaches in and out of Equilibrium (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    H. H. Nguyen et al. , Charge separation in the pho- tosystem ii reaction center resolved by multispectral two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy, Sci. Adv. 9, eade7190 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    A. V. Ruban and F. Saccon, Chlorophyll a de-excitation pathways in the lhcii antenna, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 070902 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Van Grondelle and V

    R. Van Grondelle and V. I. Novoderezhkin, Energy trans- fer in photosynthesis: experimental insights and quanti- tative models, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 793 (2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    A. V. Ruban et al., Identification of a mechanism of pho- toprotective energy dissipation in higher plants, Nature 450, 575 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Yang et al., From antenna to reaction center: Path- ways of ultrafast energy and charge transfer in photosys- tem ii, Proc

    S.-J. Yang et al., From antenna to reaction center: Path- ways of ultrafast energy and charge transfer in photosys- tem ii, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2208033119 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    F. L. De Weerd, I. H. M. Van Stokkum, H. Van Ameron- gen, J. P. Dekker, and R. Van Grondelle, Pathways for en- ergy transfer in the core light-harvesting complexes cp43 and cp47 of photosystem ii, Biophys. J. 82, 1586 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    Gobets and R

    B. Gobets and R. Van Grondelle, Energy transfer and trapping in photosystem i, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1507, 80 (2001). 9

    2001

  33. [41]

    Sohoni et al

    S. Sohoni et al. , Phycobilisome’s exciton transfer ef- ficiency relies on an energetic funnel driven by chro- mophore–linker protein interactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 11659 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Amarnath, D

    K. Amarnath, D. I. G. Bennett, A. R. Schneider, and G. R. Fleming, Multiscale model of light harvesting by photosystem ii in plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 1156 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Sipka et al

    G. Sipka et al. , Light-adapted charge-separated state of photosystem ii: structural and functional dynamics of the closed reaction center, Plant Cell 33, 1286 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    R. A. Slattery, B. J. Walker, A. P. M. Weber, and D. R. Ort, The impacts of fluctuating light on crop perfor- mance, Plant Physiol. 176, 990 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Horton, Optimization of light harvesting and photo- protection: molecular mechanisms and physiological con- sequences, Philos

    P. Horton, Optimization of light harvesting and photo- protection: molecular mechanisms and physiological con- sequences, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 3455 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Albanese et al

    P. Albanese et al. , Dynamic reorganization of photo- system ii supercomplexes in response to variations in light intensities, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1857, 1651 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Kouˇ ril, E

    R. Kouˇ ril, E. Wientjes, J. B. Bultema, R. Croce, and E. J. Boekema, High-light vs. low-light: Effect of light acclimation on photosystem ii composition and organi- zation in arabidopsis thaliana, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 1827, 411 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Croce, Beyond ‘seeing is believing’: the antenna size of the photosystems in vivo, New Phytol

    R. Croce, Beyond ‘seeing is believing’: the antenna size of the photosystems in vivo, New Phytol. 228, 1214 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Caffarri, K

    S. Caffarri, K. Broess, R. Croce, and H. van Amerongen, Excitation energy transfer and trapping in higher plant photosystem ii complexes with different antenna sizes, Biophys. J. 100, 2094 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.