Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Non-Hermitian delocalization in 1D via emergent compactness

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Paired gain and loss sites can delocalize a 1D disordered chain, exact mobility edge found

desk verdict A novel SU(2)-compactness mechanism gives a solid delocalized side in a non-Hermitian disordered chain, but the claimed exact mobility edge is missing a proof of localization outside, and one supporting statement is demonstrably false. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12490 v2 pith:JFUIU7PF submitted 2024-12-17 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Liang-Hong Mo , Zhenyu Xiao , Roderich Moessner , Hongzheng Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph MSC 82B4481Q12 PACS 72.15.Rn
keywords non-HermitianlocalizationAndersonmobilityedgetransfermatrixSU(2)compactnessimaginarypotentialdisorderLyapunovexponentparticipationratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether purely on-site gain and loss, without non-reciprocal hopping or quasiperiodic structure, can delocalize eigenstates in a one-dimensional disordered chain. It answers yes, provided the random imaginary potential is arranged in minimal 'dipolar' pairs $(+iV, -iV)$ of random orientation. For real eigenvalues inside a sharp mobility edge given by $-4E^2 + E^4 + 2E^2V^2 + V^4 = 0$, the two-letter transfer matrices $M$ and $N$ can be simultaneously similarity-transformed into compact SU(2) matrices, so the Lyapunov exponent vanishes and the localization length diverges. Outside this region localization is expected. The fraction of delocalized states depends on twisted boundary conditions and grows as a power law with system size for generic twist angles.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the pair of dipolar transfer matrices $M$ and $N$, each a two-site block with imaginary potential of opposite sign, together with the condition $\mathrm{tr}(MN) \le 2$. Because $M = N^*$ and $\mathrm{tr}(M) \in [-2,2]$, both have unit-modulus eigenvalues; a normalized eigenvector matrix $P$ diagonalizes $M$, and if $\mathrm{tr}(MN) \le 2$ the quantity $(b^*d - bd^*)(-a^*c + ac^*) \le 0$, so a further rescaling $W$ makes $U = W^{-1}P^{-1}P^*W$ an SU(2) matrix. Thus $PW$ simultaneously conjugates $M$ and $N$ into SU(2), and compactness of the group forces a random product to have zero Lyapunov exponent.

What would settle it

Numerically compute the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda_L = \lim_{N\to\infty} (1/N) \log ||T_{\text{tot}}^{(N)}||$ for a long random word of $M$ and $N$ at energies just outside the curve $\mathrm{tr}(MN) = 2$ for fixed $V$. If $\lambda_L$ vanishes, or if the participation ratio of real-energy eigenstates scales linearly with $L$ in that region, the claimed mobility edge is wrong. Alternatively, at exactly $\mathrm{tr}(MN) = 2$, check whether the $W$-rescaling exists: if $(b^*d - bd^*)(-a^*c + ac^*) = 0$ forces $W$ to degenerate and no simultaneous SU(2) conjugation exists, the boundary is not exact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that emergent compactness, not non-reciprocity or quasiperiodicity, is enough to defeat standard one-dimensional localization in a non-Hermitian chain with random imaginary potential disorder. When the disorder is made dipolar -- each disorder block containing one gain and one loss site -- the elementary transfer matrices $M = T_+ T_-$ and $N = T_- T_+$ are complex conjugates with real trace. For any real energy with $\mathrm{tr}(MN) \le 2$, the paper constructs a similarity transformation (using a diagonalizing matrix $P$ and a rescaling $W$) that maps both $M$ and $N$ into SU(2) simultaneously. Since SU(2) is compact, a random product of such matrices cannot grow, giving zero Lyapunov exponent and infinite localization length. The equality $\mathrm{tr}(MN) = 2$ yields the exact mobility edge $-4E^2 + E^4 + 2E^2V^2 + V^4 = 0$, matching participation-ratio numerics.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp phase boundary assumes that every energy outside the SU(2) region indeed gives a positive Lyapunov exponent for the random $M/N$ product; the paper cites a standard random-product theorem for this but does not prove it for this specific two-letter alphabet, and on the boundary $\mathrm{tr}(MN) = 2$ the constructed similarity transformation via $W$ can degenerate, so the exactness of the boundary is not fully pinned down by the written proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All real-energy eigenstates in the SU(2) region are delocalized, with participation ratio scaling linearly with system size in finite-size numerics.
  • The mobility edge is exactly the curve $-4E^2 + E^4 + 2E^2V^2 + V^4 = 0$, separating delocalized from localized real eigenstates.
  • For generic twist angle $K$, the number of delocalized real eigenstates grows as $L^\alpha$ with $\alpha$ between 0.2 and 0.4, so delocalized states survive in the thermodynamic limit; for periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions the count remains small.
  • Most complex-energy eigenstates are localized, but eigenvalues with sufficiently small imaginary part show delocalized scaling up to numerically accessible sizes.
  • Tuning the twisted boundary condition $K$ controls how many real energies and delocalized states appear in the spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same emergent-compactness mechanism could apply to other two-letter transfer-matrix alphabets of conjugate pairs with real trace, such as non-Hermitian hopping phases or modified disorder distributions, whenever $\mathrm{tr}(MN) \le 2$ holds.
  • Because the scaling exponent $\alpha$ is less than 1, the fraction of delocalized states vanishes in the thermodynamic limit even though their number diverges; whether this affects transport in the infinite-size limit is an open question the paper does not settle.
  • The strong boundary-condition sensitivity hints that the real-energy density can be engineered by spectral twist, which could be probed experimentally in photonic waveguide arrays with controlled gain and loss.
  • The spectrum's D2 symmetry, proven via the trace being a polynomial in $E^2$, may generalize to other purely imaginary disorder ensembles and yield paired real energies beyond the dipolar construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a 1D nearest-neighbor tight-binding chain with reciprocal hopping and a random binary imaginary on-site potential arranged in balanced ±iV dipoles. The disorder enters through the random orientation of each dipole, giving two transfer matrices M and N. The central claim is that for real energies satisfying tr(MN) ≤ 2, the two matrices can be simultaneously transformed by a fixed similarity transformation into SU(2) matrices, so every random product of them has a zero Lyapunov exponent, an infinite localization length, and delocalized eigenstates. This condition is shown to be equivalent to -4E^2 + E^4 + 2E^2V^2 + V^4 ≤ 0, yielding an exact mobility edge. Exact diagonalization and participation-ratio scaling are used to confirm delocalized states inside this region and localized states outside, with the number of delocalized real-energy states growing as a power law for generic twisted boundary conditions. The paper also discusses states with small imaginary energy and a D2 spectral symmetry.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable analytically tractable example of an exact mobility edge in a genuinely random 1D non-Hermitian system, with a clear mechanism (emergent compactness) and experimentally accessible predictions. The SU(2) construction for the delocalized side is elegant, essentially self-contained, and not circular: the mobility edge is derived from a trace inequality rather than fitted, and the participation-ratio numerics independently support the delocalized phase. The main caveat is that the exactness of the mobility edge on the localized side is not proven in the present manuscript, and one of the stated justifications for it is false in an open region. The paper deserves a major revision rather than rejection, because the gap is repairable by adding a proof of positivity of the Lyapunov exponent outside the compact region or by reframing the exactness claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Emergent compactness, paragraph after Fig. 1(b)] The exact mobility edge rests on the statement that in the red region 'both M and N have an eigenvalue larger than one, thus they do not belong to any compact subgroup of SL(2,C); therefore localization is expected.' This statement is false for an open part of the red region. From Eq. (21), tr(M)=E^2+V^2-2 and det(M)=1, so for 0<E^2+V^2<4 the eigenvalues of M are complex conjugates of modulus 1; the same holds for N. For example, E=0.5 and V=1.5 satisfy tr(MN)>2 (the mobility-edge polynomial evaluates to 5.25>0) but give E^2+V^2=2.5, so neither M nor N has an eigenvalue of modulus greater than 1. Consequently, Furstenberg's theorem cannot be invoked through the stated eigenvalue property, and the paper gives no proof that every random word with tr(MN)>2 has a positive Lyapunov exponent in this elliptic regime. Because the sharp mobility edge is a central claim, either this positivity must be proved (for instance by showing that the semigroup generated by M and N is non-compact and irreducible, or by an explicit lower bound on the Lyapunov exponent), or the exactness claim must be weakened.
  2. [Appendix, Eq. (14)-(16) and the sentence before Eq. (5)] The simultaneous SU(2) construction is only worked out for (b*d-bd*)(-a*c+ac*)<0, and the equality case is dismissed by the sentence 'When the equal sign is taken, the matrix P is sufficient.' On the boundary tr(MN)=2, however, the product is zero for generic boundary points, so one of the off-diagonal entries of P^{-1}P* vanishes; the W construction in Eq. (14) then degenerates, and the appendix's case division maps this to the triangular Case 2, which is excluded by Condition 1. The manuscript therefore does not actually prove that the boundary of the blue region is delocalized, although the text explicitly asserts that the black line is included. A separate treatment of the boundary, or an explicit statement that the boundary is understood only as a limit, is needed for the claimed exact mobility edge.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix, opening of the proof] The stated condition is tr(MN) in [-2,2], but Condition 3 and Eq. (4) in the main text only impose tr(MN) ≤ 2; please clarify whether the lower bound is automatic for the dipolar model or is an additional requirement.
  2. [Eq. (14)] The square root in the definition of W has two branches; specify the chosen branch and explain why the resulting similarity transformation is single-valued.
  3. [Fig. 1(c) caption and main text] The caption says the fraction of eigenstates is around 10^-4 for K=0 and pi, whereas the main text reports a ~10^-2 fraction of real energies and a ~10^-4 fraction of delocalized states; please make the caption and text consistent.
  4. [Eq. (9)] The participation ratio is defined for normalized right eigenvectors; for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian it would be helpful to state explicitly that no biorthogonal normalization is used and to justify this choice for the localization diagnostic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the mobility edge is derived from an explicit algebraic similarity transformation of the transfer matrices, and the numerics provide an independent check.

full rationale

The central claim is that for real energies satisfying tr(MN) ≤ 2, the two-letter random product of M = T+T− and N = T−T+ is compact: an explicit similarity transformation using the eigenvector matrix P and the auxiliary matrix W maps both letters into SU(2), forcing a zero Lyapunov exponent and an infinite localization length. This is a direct algebraic derivation from the explicit forms of M and N in the Appendix; the condition tr(MN) ≤ 2 is computed, not fitted, and the mobility-edge curve −4E^2 + E^4 + 2E^2V^2 + V^4 = 0 is exactly the equality tr(MN) = 2. No fitted parameter enters the analytical prediction, and the numerical participation ratios are an independent check of the delocalized and localized regions. Self-citations in the reference list are background material and are not load-bearing for the transfer-matrix derivation; the only external theorem invoked, Furstenberg's theorem, is a standard classical result. The weakest step is the localized side, where the paper infers localization from the statement that both M and N have an eigenvalue larger than one, and this is not fully proved for the whole red region; however, that is a proof gap and a possible correctness concern, not a circular reduction of the claim to its inputs. The paper does not define delocalization as the SU(2) condition, nor does it quote the mobility edge from the numerics. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends only on standard linear algebra, Furstenberg's theorem, and the stated transfer-matrix/Lyapunov correspondence. The model parameters V and K are external control knobs, not fitted constants; the fitted scaling exponent alpha characterizes finite-size asymptotics and does not enter the mobility-edge derivation. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Furstenberg's theorem: a random product of matrices in a non-compact semisimple Lie group generically has positive Lyapunov exponent.
    Invoked to argue localization outside the SU(2) region, in the section 'Emergent compactness' and Ref. [62].
  • standard math SU(2) is compact, so any product of SU(2) matrices has norm 1 and a zero Lyapunov exponent.
    Used to convert the simultaneous similarity transformation into an infinite localization length, in the section 'Emergent compactness'.
  • domain assumption The localization length is the inverse of the transfer-matrix Lyapunov exponent.
    Standard 1D transfer-matrix relation, stated in 'The model' with Refs. [59-61].
  • domain assumption The nearest-neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian with on-site imaginary potential is the physical model, and eigenstates are right eigenvectors of H.
    The entire analysis is built on this model and on the transfer-matrix representation of its Schrödinger equation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Hermitian delocalization in 1D via emergent compactness." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JFUIU7PF

@misc{pith2026241212490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Hermitian delocalization in 1D via emergent compactness},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JFUIU7PF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12490}
}
read the original abstract

Potential disorder in 1D leads to Anderson localization of the entire spectrum. Upon sacrificing hermiticity by adding non-reciprocal hopping, the non-Hermitian skin effect competes with localization. We find another route for delocalization, which involves imaginary potential disorder. While an entirely random potential generally still leads to localization, imposing minimal spatial structure to the disorder can protect delocalization: it endows the concomitant transfer matrix with an SU(2) structure, whose compactness in turn translates into an infinite localization length. The fraction of delocalized states can be tuned by the choice of boundary conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic for the emergent compact structure. The overall gray region denotes the non-compact SL(2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Scaling of the participation ratio (PR) for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) PR for the entire complex spectrum. Our simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  2. [2]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1355 (2008), arXiv:0707.4378 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization, Physical review letters 118, 266601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Li, R.-L

    J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological anderson insulator, Physical review letters 102, 136806 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Titum, E

    P. Titum, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Anomalous floquet-anderson insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump, Physical Review X 6, 021013 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    St¨ utzer, Y

    S. St¨ utzer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lind- ner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Pho- tonic topological anderson insulators, Nature 560, 461 (2018)

    2018

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Physical review let- ters 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    Feinberg and A

    J. Feinberg and A. Zee, Non-hermitian random matrix theory: Method of hermitian reduction, Nucl. Phys. B 504, 579 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    Feinberg and A

    J. Feinberg and A. Zee, Non-Hermitian localization and delocalization, Phys. Rev. E 59, 6433 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Regensburger, M.-A

    A. Regensburger, M.-A. Miri, C. Bersch, J. N¨ ager, G. On- ishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Obser- vation of defect states in pt-symmetric optical lattices, Physical review letters 110, 223902 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    B. Xu, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Integer quantum magnon Hall plateau-plateau transition in a spin-ice model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 220403(R) (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    K. Ding, G. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental re- alization, Physical Review X 6, 021007 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Martinez Alvarez, J

    V. Martinez Alvarez, J. Barrios Vargas, and L. Foa Tor- res, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Physical Review B 97, 121401 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological Phases of Non- Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Non- hermitian many-body localization, Physical review let- ters 123, 090603 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    A. F. Tzortzakakis, K. G. Makris, and E. N. Economou, Non-Hermitian disorder in two-dimensional optical lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014202 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Wang and X

    C. Wang and X. R. Wang, Level statistics of extended states in random non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165114 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Huang and B

    Y. Huang and B. I. Shklovskii, Anderson transition in three-dimensional systems with non-Hermitian disorder, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014204 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- hermitian boundary modes and topology, Physical review letters 124, 056802 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Huang and B

    Y. Huang and B. I. Shklovskii, Spectral rigidity of non- Hermitian symmetric random matrices near the Ander- son transition, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064212 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Kawabata and S

    K. Kawabata and S. Ryu, Nonunitary Scaling Theory of Non-Hermitian Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 166801 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    X. Luo, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Universality Classes of the Anderson Transitions Driven by Non-Hermitian Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 090402 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    X. Luo, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Transfer matrix study of the Anderson transition in non-Hermitian sys- tems (2021), arXiv:2103.05239 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    X. Luo, Z. Xiao, K. Kawabata, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shin- dou, Unifying the Anderson transitions in Hermitian and non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022035 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zhu and J

    W. Zhu and J. Gong, Hybrid skin-topological modes without asymmetric couplings, Physical Review B 106, 035425 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Y. Li, C. Liang, C. Wang, C. Lu, and Y.-C. Liu, Gain- loss-induced hybrid skin-topological effect, Physical Re- view Letters 128, 223903 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Zhang and Z

    T. Zhang and Z. Cai, Emergent non-hermitian physics 6 in a generalized lotka-volterra model, Physical Review B 108, 104304 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Manna and B

    S. Manna and B. Roy, Inner skin effects on non- hermitian topological fractals, communications physics 6, 10 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Zhu, X.-Q

    P. Zhu, X.-Q. Sun, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Higher rank chirality and non-hermitian skin effect in a topolec- trical circuit, Nature communications 14, 720 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Thompson, Y

    F. Thompson, Y. Huang, and A. Kamenev, Localiza- tion of Lindbladian fermions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174201 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    B. Li, C. Chen, and Z. Wang, Universal non- hermitian transport in disordered systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19905 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Z.-Y. Xing, S. Chen, and H. Hu, Universal spreading dynamics in quasiperiodic non-hermitian systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01301 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Halder, S

    D. Halder, S. Lahiri, and S. Basu, Competing topological phases in a non-hermitian time-reversal symmetry broken bernevig-hughes-zhang model, Physical Review B 110, 115132 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-hermitian systems, Physical review letters 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory of non-hermitian systems, Physical review letters 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effects, Physi- cal review letters 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phe- nomena: A review, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Z. Chen, K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, and S. Ryu, Field theory of non-hermitian disordered systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11878 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-hermitian quasicrystals, Physical review letters 122, 237601 (2019)

    S. Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-hermitian quasicrystals, Physical review letters 122, 237601 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Y. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Localization transi- tion, spectrum structure, and winding numbers for one- dimensional non-hermitian quasicrystals, Physical Re- view B 104, 024201 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Zhai, G.-Y

    L.-J. Zhai, G.-Y. Huang, and S. Yin, Cascade of the delocalization transition in a non-hermitian interpolat- ing aubry-andr´ e-fibonacci chain, Physical Review B104, 014202 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Quan- tum entanglement of non-hermitian quasicrystals, Phys- ical Review B 105, L121115 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980)

    1980

  39. [47]

    Liu and R

    Y. Liu and R. Riklund, Electronic properties of perfect and nonperfect one-dimensional quasicrystals, Physical Review B 35, 6034 (1987)

    1987

  40. [48]

    Axel and J

    F. Axel and J. Peyri` ere, Spectrum and extended states in a harmonic chain with controlled disorder: effects of the thue-morse symmetry, Journal of statistical physics 57, 1013 (1989)

    1989

  41. [49]

    Biddle, B

    J. Biddle, B. Wang, D. Priour Jr, and S. Das Sarma, Localization in one-dimensional incommensurate lat- tices beyond the aubry-andr´ e model, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 80, 021603 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Y. Wang, X. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Yao, S. Chen, J. You, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges, Physical Review Letters 125, 196604 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Basiri, Y

    A. Basiri, Y. Bromberg, A. Yamilov, H. Cao, and T. Kot- tos, Light localization induced by a random imaginary refractive index, Physical Review A 90, 043815 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Yusipov, T

    I. Yusipov, T. Laptyeva, S. Denisov, and M. Ivanchenko, Localization in open quantum systems, Physical review letters 118, 070402 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Tzortzakakis, K

    A. Tzortzakakis, K. Makris, A. Szameit, and E. Economou, Transport and spectral features in non-hermitian open systems, Physical Review Research 3, 013208 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, S. Longhi, and A. Szameit, Coexistence of dynamical delocalization and spectral lo- calization through stochastic dissipation, Nature Photon- ics 15, 576 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    B. C. Hall, Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representations (Springer, 2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Woit, Quantum theory, groups and representations, Vol

    P. Woit, Quantum theory, groups and representations, Vol. 4 (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    The localization length is defined as ξ(E) ≡ (mini |λi|)−1 for an eigenstate with energy E

    The corresponding Lyapunov exponents λi (i = 1, 2; λ1 ≥ λ2) are defined by the eigenvalues of limN →∞ log[(T (N ) tot )†T (N ) tot ]/2N . The localization length is defined as ξ(E) ≡ (mini |λi|)−1 for an eigenstate with energy E. For the 2 × 2 transfer matrix here, we always h...

  51. [59]

    Carmona, Exponential localization in one-dimensional disordered systems, Duke Mathematical Journal 49, 191 (1982)

    R. Carmona, Exponential localization in one-dimensional disordered systems, Duke Mathematical Journal 49, 191 (1982)

    1982

  52. [60]

    Comtet, C

    A. Comtet, C. Texier, and Y. Tourigny, Lyapunov expo- nents, one-dimensional anderson localization and prod- ucts of random matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical 46, 254003 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    Slevin and T

    K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Critical exponent for the An- derson transition in the three-dimensional orthogonal universality class, New J. Phys. 16, 015012 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Furstenberg, Noncommuting random products, Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society 108, 377 (1963)

    H. Furstenberg, Noncommuting random products, Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society 108, 377 (1963)

    1963

  55. [63]

    Bendix, R

    O. Bendix, R. Fleischmann, T. Kottos, and B. Shapiro, Optical structures with local-symmetry, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43, 265305 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    The analytical expression for the mobility edge is −4E2 + E4 + 2E2V 2 + V 4 = 0

  57. [65]

    Kohmoto, Localization problem and mapping of one- dimensional wave equations in random and quasiperiodic media, Physical Review B 34, 5043 (1986)

    M. Kohmoto, Localization problem and mapping of one- dimensional wave equations in random and quasiperiodic media, Physical Review B 34, 5043 (1986)

    1986

  58. [66]

    M. C. Zheng, D. N. Christodoulides, R. Fleischmann, and T. Kottos, Pt optical lattices and universality in beam dynamics, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 82, 010103 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Regensburger, C

    A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. On- ishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Parity– time synthetic photonic lattices, Nature 488, 167 (2012). 7

    2012

  60. [68]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of pt-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Physical review letters 103, 093902 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    L. Cong, J. Han, W. Zhang, and R. Singh, Temporal loss boundary engineered photonic cavity, Nature Communi- cations 12, 6940 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Q. Lin, T. Li, L. Xiao, K. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Topological phase transitions and mobility edges in non- hermitian quasicrystals, Physical Review Letters 129, 113601 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    A. Ma, T. Dai, J. Mao, Z. Fu, Y. Yang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Anisotropic quantum transport in a pro- grammable photonic topological insulator, Optica 11, 1533 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    S¨ usstrunk and S

    R. S¨ usstrunk and S. D. Huber, Classification of topo- logical phonons in linear mechanical metamaterials, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, E4767 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Ergodic and noner- godic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local hilbert space dimension, Physical Review Letters 126, 100603 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Granet, C

    E. Granet, C. Zhang, and H. Dreyer, Volume-law to area- law entanglement transition in a nonunitary periodic gaussian circuit, Physical Review Letters 130, 230401 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Emergent spatial structure and entanglement localization in floquet conformal field theory, Physical Review X 10, 031036 (2020). End Matter Appendix.— In the following, we prove that the condition tr(MN ) ∈ [−2, 2] leads to an emergent...

    2020

  68. [76]

    M, N are not triangular matrices and they satisfy M = N ∗

  69. [77]

    Non-Hermitian delocalization in 1D via emergent compactness

    tr( MN ) ≤ 2. Proof. Condition 1 and 2 imply that the eigenvalues of M and N are u + iv, u− iv with u2 + v2 = 1. Thus they can be expressed as M = P ΛP −1, P= a b c d , Λ = u + iv 0 0 u − iv , (10) N = P ∗Λ∗(P ∗)−1, (11) where each column of P is an eigenvector of M. For simpl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.