Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 53 references

On the B\"acklund transform and the stability of the line soliton of the KP-II equation on $\mathbb R^2$

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A rigorous Bäcklund transform is constructed for KP-II on the plane, and its image is shown to be a codimension-1 manifold, yielding codimension-1 L2 stability of the line soliton at sharp regularity.

desk verdict A real construction of the KP-II Bäcklund transform, but the codimension-1 range theorem rests on an unproved uniqueness claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12530 v1 pith:HO6C2FSJ submitted 2024-12-17 math.AP

Lorenzo Pompili This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP
keywords linemathbbstabilityacklundequationsolitontransformcodimension-1
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the KP-II equation, a two-dimensional version of the KdV equation used to model shallow water waves. A line soliton is a wave that moves without changing shape, is constant in the transversal direction, and is infinitely long. Previous work by Mizumachi proved that under small perturbations the soliton remains close to a modulated version of itself, but that proof did not use the equation's hidden integrable structure. This paper constructs a Bäcklund transform, a nonlinear operation that formally adds a line soliton to any small solution. The construction works by solving a forced viscous Burgers equation through the Cole-Hopf transformation, which turns the nonlinear problem into a linear heat equation with a potential.

The main new finding is that this addition map does not cover all small perturbations of the line soliton. Its image is a codimension-1 manifold, meaning exactly one scalar condition must be satisfied. The paper defines this condition through a functional Φ computed from a solution of an auxiliary linear equation. Restricting to perturbations satisfying Φ=0, the authors prove L2 modulational stability of the line soliton with data of sharp Sobolev regularity, a result they frame as complementary to Mizumachi's. They also construct a similar addition map for a class of multisolitons and conjecture that the missing degree of freedom corresponds to the long-time phase shift of the soliton.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem D and Corollary E: for small g in Yε(R²), Φ(g)=0 holds if and only if g+φ is in the range of the Bäcklund transform B(u,γ0)=u−2∂xV(u,γ0), and consequently the line soliton is modulationally stable in L2 under perturbations in the analytic codimension-1 manifold N={g∈Yε | Φ(g)=0, ‖g‖Yε<δ}. If the paper is correct, the KP-II flow commutes with B for a suitable time-dependent parameter, and the distance to modulated solitons is comparable to the size of the underlying zero solution.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem that the range is exactly codim-1 relies on the uniqueness claim in the proof of Theorem D that two solutions w1 and w2 of the forced Burgers equation (5.2) that lie in L3,∞(R2) ∩ cosh(x)L2(R2) with the same forcing g must coincide. This claim is used to show that when Φ(g)≠0 the constructed w cannot be produced by the Bäcklund map, since it is in L3,∞ but not L3. The paper's proof of the claim depends on a sketched mapping property of the operator ∂xT and a bootstrap on half-planes, and this is the most fragile point in the range characterization.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a rigorous Bäcklund transform for the KP-II equation on R2. Theorem A classifies solutions of the forced viscous Burgers equation (M) near a modulated kink: for small u in Hdot^{-1/2,0}(R2) and gamma0 in R there is a unique solution v of the form v = tanh(alpha) + ... with alpha = alpha(y), yielding a one-parameter family V(u,gamma0). The associated soliton addition map B(u,gamma0) = u - 2 d_x V(u,gamma0) satisfies two-sided L2 bounds (Corollary B) and commutes with the KP-II flow for a suitable time-dependent parameter (Theorem C), so that images of small solutions are solutions near a modulated line soliton. The central structural claim is Theorem D: in a small ball of a weighted space Y_epsilon, the range of B around the line soliton is exactly the analytic codimension-1 manifold {g : Phi(g) = 0}, with Phi defined through a backward parabolic problem and related to singular terms in the scattering data. The forward direction of Theorem D, together with Theorem C, yields Corollary E: codimension-1 modulational L2-stability of the line soliton at sharp regularity. Section 6 constructs a similar addition map for (k,1)-multisolitons. The paper ends with conjectures linking Phi to the asymptotic phase shift in Mizumachi's theory and to the removability of the codimension-1 condition.

Significance. If established, Theorem D would provide the first exact description of the range of a Bäcklund transform for KP-II on the whole plane, and Corollary E would give the first L2-stability statement for the line soliton at sharp (L2) regularity, with the codimension-1 restriction honestly identified as an intrinsic obstruction rather than a mere technical artifact. The paper's strengths are substantial: the Cole-Hopf superposition formulas (Definition 3.20, Proposition 3.19) are explicit and constructive; Theorem C is proved in detail, including a well-posedness result around modulated solitons (Proposition 4.7); the forward implication of Theorem D rests on a coherent parabolic Hardy-space mechanism; and the conjectured equivalence h = 0 iff Phi(g) = 0 is a concrete, falsifiable prediction connecting the transform to known long-time behavior. The reservations below are concentrated in the proof of Theorem D: the 'only if' direction is not established as written (Major Comments 1 and 2), and the forward direction contains an arithmetic inconsistency concerning the admissible range of epsilon (Major Comment 3). Theorem C and Corollary E do not depend on the 'only if' direction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.6 (Claim in the proof of Theorem D)] The uniqueness Claim is not established. It asserts that any two solutions w1, w2 in L^{3,∞}(R2) ∩ cosh(x)L2(R2) of equation (5.2) with the same forcing must coincide. The contraction argument requires the restriction 1_{y<M0}(w1+w2) to be small in X = L^{3,∞} ∩ cosh^ε L2 for M0 sufficiently negative. The cosh^ε L2 part of the tail does tend to zero (since cosh^ε(x) ≤ cosh(x) for ε ≤ 1), but the L^{3,∞} part need not: the function f = Σ_n n 1_{[-n^{-4},0]×[-n,-n+1]} belongs to L^{3,∞}(R2) ∩ L2(R2) and satisfies ‖1_{y<-M}f‖_{L^{3,∞}} ≳ 1 for every M (its distribution function satisfies |{|f|>α}| ≈ Σ_{n≥α} n^{-4} ≈ α^{-3}, so α |{|f|>α}|^{1/3} = O(1)). Membership in L^{3,∞} ∩ cosh(x)L2 therefore imposes no decay in y. The same gap invalidates the claim that a homogeneous linear solution 'must be zero by sending y0 to −∞', which presupposes ‖z(y0)‖_{L1+L∞} → 0 as y0 → −∞. Because this uniqueness is exactly what forces w = w′ when Φ(g) ≠ 0, the 'only if' direction of Theorem D is unproved as written. Corollary E is not affected: its stability statement uses only the forward implication Φ(g) = 0 ⇒ g + φ in the range of B, which is independent of the Claim.
  2. [Section 5.6 (proof of Theorem D, second half)] The strict non-integrability assertion 'ψx, w ∈ L^{3,∞}(R2) \ L3(R2)' when Φ(g) ≠ 0 is supported only by 'a quick study of the kernel of Γ− − Γ+'. This assertion is load-bearing: it is the property that contradicts w′ ∈ L3(R2) at the end of the proof. The text establishes the weak-L³ membership (via Γ± ∈ L^{3,∞} and sech²hψ ∈ L1) but not the failure of the L3-integrability, which requires a quantitative lower bound on the singular part of II = ½ ∂x^{-1}(Γ− − Γ+)(sech²hψ). As printed this is a plausibility argument, not a proof; and even after repair, the contradiction is complete only once the uniqueness Claim of Major Comment 1 is available.
  3. [Section 5.6 (Theorem D, forward implication)] The weighted-estimate step in the Hardy-space check contains an arithmetic inconsistency. The text sets 1/p = (1−θ)/1 + θ/2 and states that '1 > θ > 3/(3+2ε) ⇔ δ := θε − 3/p′ > 0'. From the displayed interpolation relation one obtains p = 2/(2−θ), hence p′ = 2/θ and 3/p′ = 3θ/2, so δ = θ(ε − 3/2). Thus δ > 0 requires ε > 3/2, and the displayed threshold θ > 3/(3+2ε) is not equivalent (it corresponds to θε > 3(1−θ)/2). Since Theorem D and Corollary E are stated for every ε > 0, the proof as written does not cover ε ≤ 3/2. This issue is localized and likely repairable — for example by a direct Lp estimate using the (1+|y|)^ε decay of the data, or by restricting the statements to ε > 3/2 — but as printed it is an error.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The clause 'which the potential for generalization to multisolitons' is grammatically incomplete in both the abstract and the introduction; it should presumably read 'with the potential for generalization to multisolitons'.
  2. [Section 5.7] 'Polinomially localized perturbations' should be 'polynomially localized perturbations'.
  3. [Section 5.6] 'Derivating in x' should be 'differentiating with respect to x'; the same typo appears twice in the second half of the proof of Theorem D.
  4. [Cross-reference list in Section 1.4] The entries 'The map V is a generalization of V up to a change of variables' and 'The map V→→ is a time-dependent version of V' use indistinguishable symbols; the intended notation with the vector parameter ⃗λ (as in Propositions 3.19 and 4.17) should be restored.
  5. [Proof of Lemma 3.1] The large-data uniqueness argument is compressed ('The uniqueness for large v ∈ L3 is a consequence of the uniqueness for small v, translation invariance, and the fact that ...'); since this uniqueness underpins the elementary solutions v± used throughout Sections 3 and 4, a fuller statement or a reference would improve verifiability.
  6. [Section 5.5] Estimate (5.6) depends on the bound ‖Γ±(x,·)‖_{L2(Ry)} ≲ log^{1/2}(|x|) + ⟨x⟩^{-1/4}, which is stated without derivation; a short proof would help the reader verify the weighted claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the range characterization and stability result are derived from independent analytic constructions, with no fitted parameters or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. Theorem D defines the functional Φ by solving the linear parabolic equation (5.4) with potential h = Rg and then sets Φ(h) to the limiting mass of the solution; it is not defined in terms of membership in the range of B. The equivalence Φ(g) = 0 iff g + φ is in the range of B is proved by constructing the solution w of the forced Burgers equation (5.2) and comparing its regularity (L3 versus L3,∞) with solutions produced by Theorem A. Corollary E then uses this equivalence as a theorem, not as a hypothesis. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity, and no uniqueness or existence theorem is imported from the author's own prior work. The most delicate step, the uniqueness claim for solutions of (5.2) in L3,∞ ∩ cosh(x)L2 in the proof of Theorem D, is a substantive mathematical assertion whose proof is sketched; if it fails, the codimension-1 range characterization would be unproved, but this is a correctness risk, not a circularity. The only conditional aspect is that Corollary E proves stability under the paper's explicitly constructed manifold N, which is a legitimate structural theorem rather than a circular definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no numerical constants to data. It relies on background well-posedness theorems, standard integrable-structure identities, and classical parabolic estimates. The Bäcklund transform, the map V, and the functional Φ are mathematical constructions with explicit definitions, not entities requiring independent physical evidence.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption KP-II small-data global well-posedness in ˙H^{-1/2,0}(R^2) (Hadac-Herr-Koch)
    Used to give meaning to the flow u(t) in Theorem C and to ensure smallness is propagated; Theorem 4.5 is imported from [15].
  • standard math Integrable-structure identities: Lax pair, Miura map, and equivalence of (M-mKP-II) with mKP-II
    Section 2 derives the forced Burgers equation (M) and the Bäcklund transform from these algebraic identities; the paper proves the formal equivalences but relies on the standard Lax-pair theory.
  • standard math Linear heat-kernel estimates for parabolic operators, including anisotropic Besov, BMO, and Hardy spaces
    Appendix A proves these from classical Fourier analysis; they are used throughout to solve (M) and (5.4) and to prove Theorem D.
  • domain assumption Well-posedness of KP-II in Bourgain spaces X^{b,b1,s} around the line soliton (Molinet-Saut-Tzvetkov)
    The paper adapts [43, Theorem 1.2] in Proposition 4.7, and relies on the original theorem as a black box for the unmodulated case.
  • standard math Cole-Hopf transformation converts Burgers-type equations into linear heat equations with potential
    Used in Proposition 3.19 and Proposition 4.17 to construct explicit solutions by superposing elementary solutions; this is a classical algebraic identity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the B\"acklund transform and the stability of the line soliton of the KP-II equation on $\mathbb R^2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HO6C2FSJ

@misc{pith2026241212530,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the B\"acklund transform and the stability of the line soliton of the KP-II equation on $\mathbb R^2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HO6C2FSJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12530}
}
abstract

We study the Miura map of the KP-II equation on $\mathbb R^2$ and the resulting B\"acklund transform, which adds a line soliton to a given solution. This work aims to develop a complementary approach to T. Mizumachi's method for the $L^2$-stability of the line soliton, which the potential for generalization to multisolitons. We construct the B\"acklund transform by classifying solutions of the Miura map equation close to a modulated kink; this translates into studying eternal solutions of the forced viscous Burgers' equation under distinct boundary conditions at $\pm\infty$. We then show that its range, when intersected with a small ball in $|D_x|^{1/2} L^2(\mathbb R^2)\cap L^2(\mathbb R^2)\cap \langle{y}\rangle^{0-}\!L^1(\mathbb R^2)$, forms a codimension-1 manifold. We prove codimension-1 $L^2$-stability of the line soliton in the aforementioned weighted space as a corollary, providing the first stability result at sharp regularity. The codimension-1 condition in the range of the B\"acklund transform is an intrinsic property, and we conjecture that it corresponds to a known long time behavior of perturbed line solitons. The stability is expected to hold without this condition, as in Mizumachi's works. Finally, we show the construction of a multisoliton addition map for $(k,1)$-multisolitons, $k\geq 1$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz and D. E. Baldwin. Nonlinear shallow ocean -wave soliton interactions on flat beaches, Phys. Rev. E 86 (Sep 2012), 036305

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    T. Aktosun. Inverse scattering transform, KdV, and soli tons. In Current trends in operator theory and its appli- cations, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., vol. 149, pages 1–22. Birkh¨ auser , Basel, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    M. A. Alejo, C. Mu˜ noz, and J. M. Palacios. On asymptotic s tability of the sine-Gordon kink in the energy space, Comm. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1, 581–636

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin. Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equatio ns. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamen tal Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 343. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Bringmann, R

    B. Bringmann, R. Killip, and M. Visan. Global well-posed ness for the fifth-order KdV equation in H −1(R), Ann. PDE 7 (2021), no. 2, Paper No. 21, 46

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Buckmaster and H

    T. Buckmaster and H. Koch. The Korteweg–de Vries equatio n at H −1 regularity, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire32 (2015), no. 5, 1071–1098

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Candy and S

    T. Candy and S. Herr. On the division problem for the wave m aps equation, Ann. PDE 4 (2018), no. 2, Paper No. 17, 61

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Chakravarty and Y

    S. Chakravarty and Y. Kodama. Classification of the line- soliton solutions of KPII, J. Phys. A 41 (2008), no. 27, 275209, 33

    work page 2008

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss. Extensions of Hardy spaces and their use in analysis, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), no. 4, 569–645

    1977

  2. [10]

    Fl¨ ugge.Practical quantum mechanics

    S. Fl¨ ugge.Practical quantum mechanics . Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, engli sh edition, 1999. Translated from the 1947 German original

    1999

  3. [11]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura . Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (Nov 1967), 1095–1097

    1967

  4. [12]

    G´ erard, T

    P. G´ erard, T. Kappeler, and P. Topalov. Sharp well-pos edness results of the Benjamin-Ono equation in H s(T, R) and qualitative properties of its solutions, Acta Math. 231 (2023), no. 1, 31–88

    2023

  5. [13]

    Grafakos

    L. Grafakos. Modern Fourier analysis . Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 250. Springer, New Yor k, third edition, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    M. Hadac. Well-posedness for the Kadomtsev-Petviashv ili II equation and generalisations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 12, 6555–6572

    2008

  7. [15]

    Hadac, S

    M. Hadac, S. Herr, and H. Koch. Well-posedness and scatt ering for the KP-II equation in a critical space, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire26 (2009), no. 3, 917–941

    2009

  8. [16]

    Harrop-Griffiths, R

    B. Harrop-Griffiths, R. Killip, and M. Vi¸ san. Sharp well -posedness for the cubic NLS and mKdV in H s(R), Forum Math. Pi 12 (2024), Paper No. e6, 86

    2024

  9. [17]

    John and L

    F. John and L. Nirenberg. On functions of bounded mean os cillation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (1961), 415–426

    1961

  10. [18]

    Kappeler and P

    T. Kappeler and P. Topalov. Global well-posedness of mK dV in L2(T, R), Comm. Partial Differential Equations 30 (2005), no. 1-3, 435–449

    2005

  11. [19]

    Kappeler and P

    T. Kappeler and P. Topalov. Global wellposedness of KdV in H −1(T, R), Duke Math. J. 135 (2006), no. 2, 327–360. 79

    2006

  12. [20]

    C. E. Kenig and S. N. Ziesler. Local well posedness for mo dified Kadomstev-Petviashvili equations, Differential Integral Equations 18 (2005), no. 10, 1111–1146

    2005

  13. [21]

    C. E. Kenig and Y. Martel. Global well-posedness in the e nergy space for a modified KP II equation via the Miura transform, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 6, 2447–2488

    2006

  14. [22]

    Killip, T

    R. Killip, T. Laurens, and M. Vi¸san. Sharp well-posedn ess for the Benjamin-Ono equation, Invent. Math. 236 (2024), no. 3, 999–1054

    2024

  15. [23]

    Killip and M

    R. Killip and M. Vi¸ san. KdV is well-posed in H −1, Ann. of Math. (2) 190 (2019), no. 1, 249–305

    2019

  16. [24]

    Killip and M

    R. Killip and M. Vi¸ san. Orbital stability of KdV multis olitons in H −1, Comm. Math. Phys. 389 (2022), no. 3, 1445–1473

    2022

  17. [25]

    Koch and X

    H. Koch and X. Liao. Conserved energies for the one dimen sional Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Adv. Math. 377 (2021), 107467

    2021

  18. [26]

    Koch and X

    H. Koch and X. Liao. Conserved energies for the one dimen sional Gross-Pitaevskii equation: low regularity case, Adv. Math. 420 (2023), Paper No. 108996, 61

    2023

  19. [27]

    Koch and D

    H. Koch and D. Tataru. Conserved energies for the cubic n onlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in one dimension,Duke Math. J. 167 (2018), no. 17, 3207–3313

    2018

  20. [28]

    Koch and D

    H. Koch and D. Tataru. Multisolitons for the cubic NLS in 1-d and their stability, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 140 (2024), 155–270

    2024

  21. [29]

    H. Koch, D. Tataru, and M. Vi¸ san. Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves . Oberwolfach Seminars, vol. 45. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Koch and D

    H. Koch and D. Yu. Asymptotic stability of the sine-gord on kinks under perturbations in weighted sobolev norms. Preprint: arXiv:2308.07679, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Y. Kodama. KP solitons and the Grassmannians . SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics, vol. 22. Springe r, Singapore, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    T. Laurens. Global Well-Posedness for H −1(R) Perturbations of KdV with Exotic Spatial Asymptotics, Comm. Math. Phys. 397 (2023), no. 3, 1387–1439

    2023

  25. [33]

    P. G. Lemari´ e-Rieusset. Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem . Chapman & Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 431. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Rat on, FL, 2002

    2002

  26. [34]

    Lin and Q

    F. Lin and Q. S. Zhang. On ancient solutions of the heat eq uation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019), no. 9, 2006–2028

    2019

  27. [35]

    Merle and L

    F. Merle and L. Vega. L2 stability of solitons for KdV equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003 (2003), no. 13, 735–753

    2003

  28. [36]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. Stability of line solitons for the KP-II e quation in R2, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 238 (2015), no. 1125, vii+95

    2015

  29. [37]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. Stability of line solitons for the KP-II e quation in R2. II, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 148 (2018), no. 1, 149–198

    2018

  30. [38]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. The phase shift of line solitons for the KP -II equation. In Nonlinear dispersive partial differential equations and inverse scattering , Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 83, pages 433–495. Springer, Ne w York, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. Linear stability of elastic 2-line solit ons for the KP-II equation, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 82 (2024), no. 1, 115–226

    2024

  32. [40]

    Mizumachi and D

    T. Mizumachi and D. Pelinovsky. B¨ acklund transformat ion and L2-stability of NLS solitons, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2012 (2012), no. 9, 2034–2067

    2012

  33. [41]

    Mizumachi and Y

    T. Mizumachi and Y. Shimabukuro. Stability of Benney-L uke line solitary waves in 2 dimensions, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 5, 4238–4283

    2020

  34. [42]

    Mizumachi and N

    T. Mizumachi and N. Tzvetkov. Stability of the line soli ton of the KP-II equation under periodic transverse perturbations, Math. Ann. 352 (2012), no. 3, 659–690

    2012

  35. [43]

    Molinet, J.-C

    L. Molinet, J.-C. Saut, and N. Tzvetkov. Global well-po sedness for the KP-II equation on the background of a non-localized solution, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire28 (2011), no. 5, 653–676

    2011

  36. [44]

    R. O’Neil. Convolution operators and L(p, q ) spaces, Duke Math. J. 30 (1963), 129–142

    1963

  37. [45]

    R. S. Palais. The symmetries of solitons, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 34 (1997), no. 4, 339–403

    1997

  38. [46]

    Soria and P

    J. Soria and P. Tradacete. The least doubling constant o f a metric measure space, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 44 (2019), no. 2, 1015–1030

    2019

  39. [47]

    E. M. Stein. Singular integrals and differentiability properties of func tions. Princeton Mathematical Series, No

  40. [48]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970

    1970

  41. [49]

    E. M. Stein. Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality , and oscillatory integrals . Princeton Math- ematical Series, vol. 43. Princeton University Press, Prin ceton, NJ, 1993. With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III

    1993

  42. [50]

    B. Talbut. Low regularity conservation laws for the Ben jamin-Ono equation, Math. Res. Lett. 28 (2021), no. 3, 889–905. 80

    2021

  43. [51]

    Villarroel and M

    J. Villarroel and M. J. Ablowitz. On the initial value pr oblem for the KPII equation with data that do not decay along a line, Nonlinearity 17 (2004), no. 5, 1843–1866

    2004

  44. [52]

    D. Wu. The direct scattering problem for the perturbed G r(1, 2)/greaterorequalslant0 Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II solitons, Nonlin- earity 33 (2020), no. 12, 6729–6759

    2020

  45. [53]

    D. Wu. Stability of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili multi-lin e solitons. Preprint: arXiv:2205.07432, 2022. 81

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.