Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Efficient Oriented Object Detection with Enhanced Small Object Recognition in Aerial Images

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that adding a wavelet-based feature pyramid and dynamic Ghost convolution to YOLOv8s yields an oriented detector that matches or beats state-of-the-art rotated detectors on aerial benchmarks while using fewer parameters…

desk verdict A sensible module combination, but the experimental evidence is internally contradictory and the UCAS-AOD comparison is not credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12562 v1 pith:KYFGCXIR submitted 2024-12-17 cs.CV

Zhifei Shi , Zongyao Yin , Sheng Chang , Xiao Yi , Xianchuan Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords orientedobjectdetectionrotatedboundingboxaerialimagessmallYOLOv8lightweightnetworkwavelettransformfeaturepyramid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a rotated-bounding-box detector for aerial images, built on YOLOv8s, aimed at detecting small objects without a heavy computational footprint. It introduces three components: an Adaptive Scale Feature Pyramid (ASFP) that reuses P2-layer detail cheaply, a wavelet-transform C2f module (C2f-WTC) that enlarges receptive fields with logarithmic parameter growth, and a C2f-Ghost Dynamic Convolution module (C2f-GDC) that keeps parameters low. The reported results are 78.32 mAP on DOTAv1.0, 67.32 mAP on DIOR-R, and 97.86 mAP on UCAS-AOD with 21.6M parameters, competitive with or better than larger models such as DecoupleNet and S2A-Net. The paper's point is that small-object sensitivity and efficiency can be combined in a single-stage oriented detector.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a set of three modules inserted into YOLOv8s. ASFP distills small-object-rich features from the P2 layer using SPDConv and merges them into the P3 detection path, avoiding the computational blow-up of a dedicated P2 detection head. C2f-WTC applies a recursive Haar wavelet transform to split features into low- and high-frequency sub-bands, runs small-kernel convolutions per sub-band, and recombines with the inverse wavelet transform, yielding larger effective receptive fields at logarithmic parameter cost. C2f-GDC replaces bottleneck convolutions with dynamic expert convolutions whose added parameters scale with the number of experts, not kernel size. The OKM-CSP module with global, large, and local branches carries multi-scale feature extraction inside the neck.

What would settle it

Re-run the proposed model and the compared methods under one identical protocol: the same split of UCAS-AOD, the same input resolution, and the same mAP metric, and check whether the 95.83 mAP YOLOv8s baseline and the 97.86 mAP final result persist. If the baseline drops to the published 89-90 range under the standard protocol, the claimed small-object advantage is a protocol artifact rather than a property of the modules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a YOLOv8s backbone augmented with ASFP, C2f-WTC, and C2f-GDC can outperform or match heavier oriented detectors while using fewer parameters. On DOTAv1.0 it reports 78.32 mAP against DecoupleNet's 78.04; on DIOR-R it reports 67.32 mAP with 21.6M parameters and 52.8 GFLOPs against DecoupleNet's 23.3M parameters and 92.3 GFLOPs; on UCAS-AOD it reports 97.86 mAP against S2A-Net's 89.99. The central assertion is that small-object detail can be recovered from the P2 layer without the usual cost of a full extra detection layer, and that wavelet-decomposed convolutions give multi-scale receptive fields whose parameter count grows logarithmically rather than quadratically with receptive field size.

Load-bearing premise

The headline accuracy numbers assume the same training splits, input resolutions, and evaluation conventions as the published numbers they are compared with, so the reported gains over competitors stand only if those protocols match.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On DOTAv1.0, the method reports 78.32 mAP, surpassing S2A-Net's 76.11 with clear gains on small vehicles (70.29 AP) and storage tanks (75.60 AP).
  • On DIOR-R, it reports 67.32 mAP with 21.6M parameters and 52.8 GFLOPs, beating DecoupleNet's 67.08 mAP at lower computational cost.
  • On UCAS-AOD, it reports 97.86 mAP, with per-class AP of 96.32 for cars and 99.21 for airplanes.
  • Ablation on UCAS-AOD attributes a 0.52-point gain to ASFP alone and shows the combined modules reach 97.86 mAP against a YOLOv8s baseline of 95.83, at an added parameter cost of about 10M.
  • The parameter count of 21.6M with the reported FLOPs suggests the architecture is positioned for deployment on resource-constrained platforms such as drones or edge devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reported comparisons assume identical evaluation protocols, then the wavelet-plus-P2 recipe could plausibly transfer to other single-stage detectors or to segmentation backbones, since it targets low-level detail without a full high-resolution detection head.
  • A direct testable extension is to vary input resolution on DOTAv1.0: if ASFP's small-object gain is real, it should persist or grow at lower resolutions where P2 detail matters most.
  • Because the paper's own YOLOv8s baseline already scores 95.83 mAP on UCAS-AOD while every published competitor sits near 89, the 97.86 result is meaningful only if the training split, input size, and metric match those of the compared methods.
  • The dynamic expert convolution in C2f-GDC is architecture-agnostic, so its parameter savings could be measured on other backbones to see whether the efficiency gain is specific to YOLOv8s.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a YOLOv8-based oriented object detector for aerial imagery, combining three modules: ASFP (an adaptive scale feature pyramid that merges P2/P3 features through OKM-CSP), C2f-WTC (a C2f variant using Haar wavelet transforms), and C2f-GDC (a C2f variant using ghost dynamic convolutions). The authors report mAP values of 78.32 on DOTAv1.0, 67.32 on DIOR-R, and 97.86 on UCAS-AOD with 21.6M parameters, and claim that the model matches or exceeds state-of-the-art oriented detectors while being more lightweight. The paper includes architecture figures, equations, comparison tables, and an ablation study on UCAS-AOD.

Significance. If the empirical claims were reliable, the paper would offer a practically useful lightweight oriented detector, and the module designs are clearly described. The reporting of parameter and FLOP counts in Tables II and IV is a useful feature. However, the central comparison is undermined by internal inconsistencies and by an apparent protocol mismatch: the vanilla YOLOv8s baseline already exceeds all cited UCAS-AOD methods by a large margin, and the text contradicts its own tables. As a result, the claimed state-of-the-art performance is not currently established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III.C, Tables III and V] The UCAS-AOD results imply a protocol mismatch that invalidates the headline comparison. Table V reports the unmodified YOLOv8s baseline at 95.83 mAP50, while Table III lists the best prior method (S2A-Net) at 89.99. The proposed modules add at most 2.03 points over the baseline (97.86 vs 95.83), so the 5.84-point gap between a vanilla baseline and all cited methods cannot be explained by the proposed architecture. This gap points to different training splits, input resolutions, label conventions (rotated vs horizontal boxes), IoU thresholds, or test subsets. Because the protocols of the cited methods are not specified and the numbers are evidently not comparable, the claimed superiority of 97.86 vs 89.99 is unsupported. The same concern extends to the DOTAv1.0 and DIOR-R comparisons in Tables I and II, where cited results are taken from their original papers.
  2. [Section III.C vs Table I] The text states that for small vehicles (SV) the model achieves 70.29 AP and for storage tanks (ST) 75.60 AP. With the column order stated in Table I (PL, BD, BR, GTF, SV, LV, SH, TC, BC, ST, SBF, RA, HA, SP, HC), the Ours row gives SV=82.90, ST=70.29, and SBF=75.60. The prose values are therefore assigned to the wrong categories, and the table itself must be re-verified.
  3. [Section III.D vs Table V] The ablation narrative does not match the table. The text says ASFP increases mAP by 0.52%, but the S row gives 97.03 vs the baseline 95.83, a 1.20-point gain. The text credits C2f-WTC with 97.84, but the W-only row is 96.94; 97.84 is the S+W row. These mismatches mean the ablation study, which is the main evidence for the individual contributions, is not internally consistent.
  4. [Section III.C, Tables II and IV] The reported computational cost for the proposed model is inconsistent. Table II lists Ours as 21.6M parameters and 52.8 G FLOPs at 800x800 input, while Table IV lists Ours as 21.6M/11.4M parameters and 93.0/76.3 G FLOPs. If both entries describe the same YOLOv8s-based model, the discrepancy in FLOPs needs clarification; if they describe different configurations, the efficiency comparison in Table II is not the one claimed in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.A, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The text states that the okbranch and identity have channel ratios e and (1-e), but the equations define x'=e/(1+e)x and x''=1/(1+e)x. For e=0.25, these give 0.2/0.8 rather than 0.25/0.75. Please align the equations with the stated split.
  2. [Section II.B, Eq. (7)] The formula for C2f-GDC uses Ydynamic1 but never uses Ydynamic2; please correct the notation or the equation.
  3. [References] References [17] and [18] cite the same paper; the duplicate should be removed.
  4. [Author list] The author list contains '4th Yi Xiao' followed immediately by '7th XianChuan Yu', which appears to omit the 5th and 6th authors; please fix the numbering.
  5. [Section III.A] The paper states a 5:2:3 split into 755/302/452 images, which sums to 1509; please reconcile with the dataset size and standard split.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's equations are definitions and standard transforms, and its headline numbers are empirical measurements rather than quantities forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is modular engineering rather than a derivation: Eq. (1)-(2) define the OKM-CSP channel split with a tuned constant e=0.25; Eq. (4)-(5) restate the Haar wavelet transform and the WTConv composition; Eq. (6)-(7) define dynamic convolution and the C2f-GDC residual form. None of these equations takes as input the quantity it purports to output. The headline mAP values are empirical measurements from Tables I-III and V, not quantities obtained by fitting a parameter and then re-predicting the same data. The hyperparameter e is a chosen constant, and the gains attributed to the S/W/G modules are ablation measurements. Even though some prose numbers are misaligned with the tables (the SV/ST/SBF values, the 0.52 vs 1.20 ASFP gain, and the attribution of 97.84 to W alone), those are internal-consistency or reporting errors rather than circular reductions. The concern that a plain YOLOv8s baseline reaches 95.83 mAP on UCAS-AOD while cited methods are near 89 suggests different evaluation protocols is a legitimate threat to the validity of the SOTA comparison, but protocol mismatch is not a self-referential derivation. There are no self-citations carrying a load-bearing argument, and no predicted quantity is equivalent by construction to a fitted input. Therefore no circular step is exhibited and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new theoretical entities. It depends on a handful of hand-set hyperparameters and, more importantly, on unverified equivalence between its evaluation protocol and those of published baselines.

free parameters (3)
  • e (OKM-CSP channel split ratio) = 0.25
    Chosen by hand for better performance; not derived. It controls how much of the feature map enters the OmniKernel branch.
  • M (number of dynamic convolution experts) = not specified
    The number of expert kernels in Eq. (6) is a free design choice, but the paper never states its value.
  • Wavelet decomposition level = not specified
    The recursion in Eq. (4) is applied to XLL, but the number of decomposition levels is not given, yet it affects receptive field and computational cost.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption YOLOv8s baseline is a fair starting point for comparison with the cited oriented detectors.
    Section III.B uses YOLOv8s pretrained on ImageNet with a rotated head, but the paper does not explain how the competitor baselines were adapted to the same training pipeline, so the comparison rests on an unstated protocol equivalence.
  • domain assumption The UCAS-AOD split is the same as the one used by the cited methods.
    Section III.A states the dataset was split 5:2:3 following 'DOTA's standard split ratio,' which is not a defined DOTA convention and may differ from the splits used to produce the published numbers in Table III.
  • domain assumption The reported FLOPs are measured under comparable input sizes.
    Table II reports 52.8 G FLOPs at 800x800, while Table IV reports 93.0 G for the same model without specifying input size; the discrepancy is unexplained.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient Oriented Object Detection with Enhanced Small Object Recognition in Aerial Images." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYFGCXIR

@misc{pith2026241212562,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient Oriented Object Detection with Enhanced Small Object Recognition in Aerial Images},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYFGCXIR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12562}
}
read the original abstract

Achieving a balance between computational efficiency and detection accuracy in the realm of rotated bounding box object detection within aerial imagery is a significant challenge. While prior research has aimed at creating lightweight models that enhance computational performance and feature extraction, there remains a gap in the performance of these networks when it comes to the detection of small and multi-scale objects in remote sensing (RS) imagery. To address these challenges, we present a novel enhancement to the YOLOv8 model, tailored for oriented object detection tasks and optimized for environments with limited computational resources. Our model features a wavelet transform-based C2f module for capturing associative features and an Adaptive Scale Feature Pyramid (ASFP) module that leverages P2 layer details. Additionally, the incorporation of GhostDynamicConv significantly contributes to the model's lightweight nature, ensuring high efficiency in aerial imagery analysis. Featuring a parameter count of 21.6M, our approach provides a more efficient architectural design than DecoupleNet, which has 23.3M parameters, all while maintaining detection accuracy. On the DOTAv1.0 dataset, our model demonstrates a mean Average Precision (mAP) that is competitive with leading methods such as DecoupleNet. The model's efficiency, combined with its reduced parameter count, makes it a strong candidate for aerial object detection, particularly in resource-constrained environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12562 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of our model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of OKM-CSP 1) C2f-Wavelet Transform Convolution (C2f-WTC): The C2f module in YOLOv8 is pivotal for object detection but encounters limitations in feature extraction due to localized convolution operations, particularly with complex images. To address these challenges, we introduce the C2f-Wavelet Transform Convolution (C2f-WTC), which leverages wavelet transforms to enhance receptive fields while minimizing… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparative detection results displayed in three rows for clarity. The top row shows the original images from the UCAS-AOD (a, b, c) and DOTAv1.0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The top row displays feature maps from the C2f-WTC (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A comprehensive review of object detection with deep learning

    Ravpreet Kaur and Sarbjeet Singh. A comprehensive review of object detection with deep learning. Digital Signal Processing , 132:103812, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Segmentation based rotated bounding boxes prediction and image synthesizing for object detection of high resolution aerial images

    Yingming Wang, Lijun Wang, Huchuan Lu, and You He. Segmentation based rotated bounding boxes prediction and image synthesizing for object detection of high resolution aerial images. Neurocomputing, 388:202–211, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Pointobb: Learning oriented object detection via single point supervision

    Junwei Luo, Xue Yang, Yi Yu, Qingyun Li, Junchi Yan, and Yansheng Li. Pointobb: Learning oriented object detection via single point supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 16730–16740, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Learning high-precision bounding box for rotated object detection via kullback-leibler divergence

    Xue Yang, Xiaojiang Yang, Jirui Yang, Qi Ming, Wentao Wang, Qi Tian, and Junchi Yan. Learning high-precision bounding box for rotated object detection via kullback-leibler divergence. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:18381–18394, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Learning a rotation invariant detector with rotatable bounding box

    Lei Liu, Zongxu Pan, and Bin Lei. Learning a rotation invariant detector with rotatable bounding box. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.09405 , 2017

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recogni- tion

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recogni- tion. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 37:1904–1916, 2015

    work page 1904

  7. [7]

    Yolov6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications

    Chuyi Li, Lulu Li, Hongliang Jiang, Kaiheng Weng, Yifei Geng, Liang Li, Zaidan Ke, Qingyuan Li, Meng Cheng, Weiqiang Nie, et al. Yolov6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02976 , 2022

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Feature pyramid networks for object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Doll ´ar, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariha- ran, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117–2125, 2017. TABLE I EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF THE BASELINE NETWORK ON THE DOTAV1.0 DATASET. LV: LARGE VEHICLE. SP: SWIMMI...

    work page 2017

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Path aggregation network for instance segmentation

    Shu Liu, Lu Qi, Haifang Qin, Jianping Shi, and Jiaya Jia. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 8759–8768, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Ghostnet: More features from cheap operations

    Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Qi Tian, Jianyuan Guo, Chunjing Xu, and Chang Xu. Ghostnet: More features from cheap operations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1580–1589, 2020. TABLE IV OVERVIEW OF METHODS , BACKBONE , AND PAR...

    2020

  3. [11]

    Ghostnetv2: Enhance cheap operation with long-range attention

    Yehui Tang, Kai Han, Jianyuan Guo, Chang Xu, Chao Xu, and Yunhe Wang. Ghostnetv2: Enhance cheap operation with long-range attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:9969–9982, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    A lightweight and multiscale network for remote sensing image scene classification

    Lin Bai, Qingxin Liu, Cuiling Li, Chunlin Zhu, Zhen Ye, and Meng Xi. A lightweight and multiscale network for remote sensing image scene classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 19:1–5, Fig. 3. Comparative detection results displayed in three rows for clari...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Lo-det: Lightweight oriented object detection in remote sensing images

    Zhanchao Huang, Wei Li, Xiang-Gen Xia, Hao Wang, Feiran Jie, and Ran Tao. Lo-det: Lightweight oriented object detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 60:1–15, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Photorealistic style transfer via wavelet transforms

    Jaejun Yoo, Youngjung Uh, Sanghyuk Chun, Byeongkyu Kang, and Jung-Woo Ha. Photorealistic style transfer via wavelet transforms. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 9036–9045, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    M-rwtl: Learning signal-matched rational wavelet transform in lifting framework

    Naushad Ansari and Anubha Gupta. M-rwtl: Learning signal-matched rational wavelet transform in lifting framework. IEEE Access , pages 12213–12227, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Yolov8n bt: Research on classroom learning behavior recognition algorithm based on improved yolov8n

    Qingtang Liu, Ruyi Jiang, Qi Xu, Deng Wang, Zhiqiang Sang, Xinyu Jiang, and Linjing Wu. Yolov8n bt: Research on classroom learning behavior recognition algorithm based on improved yolov8n. IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  9. [18]

    Detection method of the seat belt for workers at height based on uav image and yolo algorithm

    Yuzheng Liu, Jianxun Zhang, Lei Shi, Mingxiang Huang, Linyu Lin, Lingfeng Zhu, Xianglu Lin, and Chuanlei Zhang. Detection method of the seat belt for workers at height based on uav image and yolo algorithm. Array, 22:100340, 2024

    2024

  10. [19]

    Decou- plenet: A lightweight backbone network with efficient feature decoupling for remote sensing visual tasks

    Wei Lu, Si-Bao Chen, Qing-Ling Shu, Jin Tang, and Bin Luo. Decou- plenet: A lightweight backbone network with efficient feature decoupling for remote sensing visual tasks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024

    2024

  11. [20]

    No more strided convolutions or pooling: A new cnn building block for low-resolution images and small objects

    Raja Sunkara and Tie Luo. No more strided convolutions or pooling: A new cnn building block for low-resolution images and small objects. In Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases , pages 443–459. Springer, 2022

    2022

  12. [21]

    Omni-kernel network for image restoration

    Yuning Cui, Wenqi Ren, and Alois Knoll. Omni-kernel network for image restoration. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 1426–1434, 2024

    2024

  13. [22]

    Parameternet: Parameters are all you need for large-scale visual pretraining of mobile networks

    Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Jianyuan Guo, and Enhua Wu. Parameternet: Parameters are all you need for large-scale visual pretraining of mobile networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 15751–15761, 2024

    2024

  14. [23]

    Dota: A large- scale dataset for object detection in aerial images

    Gui-Song Xia, Xiang Bai, Jian Ding, Zhen Zhu, Serge Belongie, Jiebo Luo, Mihai Datcu, Marcello Pelillo, and Liangpei Zhang. Dota: A large- scale dataset for object detection in aerial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pa...

    2018

  15. [24]

    Anchor-free oriented proposal generator for object detection

    Gong Cheng, Jiabao Wang, Ke Li, Xingxing Xie, Chunbo Lang, Yanqing Yao, and Junwei Han. Anchor-free oriented proposal generator for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60:1– 11, 2022

    2022

  16. [25]

    Orientation robust object detection in aerial images using deep convolutional neural network

    Haigang Zhu, Xiaogang Chen, Weiqun Dai, Kun Fu, Qixiang Ye, and Jianbin Jiao. Orientation robust object detection in aerial images using deep convolutional neural network. In 2015 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP) , pages 3735–3739. IEEE, 2015

    2015

  17. [26]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei- Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009

    2009

  18. [27]

    Align deep features for oriented object detection

    Jiaming Han, Jian Ding, Jie Li, and Gui-Song Xia. Align deep features for oriented object detection. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 60:1–11, 2021

    2021

  19. [28]

    Piou loss: Towards accurate oriented object detection in complex environments

    Zhiming Chen, Kean Chen, Weiyao Lin, John See, Hui Yu, Yan Ke, and Cong Yang. Piou loss: Towards accurate oriented object detection in complex environments. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16, pages 1...

    2020

  20. [29]

    Objects as points

    Xingyi Zhou, Dequan Wang, and Philipp Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl. Objects as points. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07850 , 2019

    1904 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Oriented objects as pairs of middle lines

    Haoran Wei, Yue Zhang, Zhonghan Chang, Hao Li, Hongqi Wang, and Xian Sun. Oriented objects as pairs of middle lines. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 169:268–279, 2020

    2020

  22. [31]

    Phase-shifting coder: Predicting accurate orientation in oriented object detection

    Yi Yu and Feipeng Da. Phase-shifting coder: Predicting accurate orientation in oriented object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13354– 13363, 2023

    2023

  23. [32]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 770–778, 2016

    2016

  24. [33]

    Arbitrary-oriented object detection in remote sensing images based on polar coordinates

    Lin Zhou, Haoran Wei, Hao Li, Wenzhe Zhao, Yi Zhang, and Yue Zhang. Arbitrary-oriented object detection in remote sensing images based on polar coordinates. IEEE Access, 8:223373–223384, 2020

    2020

  25. [34]

    Oriented object detection in aerial images with box boundary-aware vectors

    Jingru Yi, Pengxiang Wu, Bo Liu, Qiaoying Huang, Hui Qu, and Dimitris Metaxas. Oriented object detection in aerial images with box boundary-aware vectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 2150–2159, 2021

    2021

  26. [35]

    Scrdet: Towards more robust detection for small, cluttered and rotated objects

    Xue Yang, Jirui Yang, Junchi Yan, Yue Zhang, Tengfei Zhang, Zhi Guo, Xian Sun, and Kun Fu. Scrdet: Towards more robust detection for small, cluttered and rotated objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 8232–8241, 2019

    2019

  27. [36]

    Learning roi transformer for oriented object detection in aerial images

    Jian Ding, Nan Xue, Yang Long, Gui-Song Xia, and Qikai Lu. Learning roi transformer for oriented object detection in aerial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2849–2858, 2019

    2019

  28. [37]

    Gliding vertex on the horizontal bounding box for multi-oriented object detection

    Yongchao Xu, Mingtao Fu, Qimeng Wang, Yukang Wang, Kai Chen, Gui-Song Xia, and Xiang Bai. Gliding vertex on the horizontal bounding box for multi-oriented object detection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 43:1452–1459, 2020

    2020

  29. [38]

    Redet: A rotation- equivariant detector for aerial object detection

    Jiaming Han, Jian Ding, Nan Xue, and Gui-Song Xia. Redet: A rotation- equivariant detector for aerial object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2786–2795, 2021

    2021

  30. [39]

    Oriented reppoints for aerial object detection

    Wentong Li, Yijie Chen, Kaixuan Hu, and Jianke Zhu. Oriented reppoints for aerial object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1829– 1838, 2022

    2022

  31. [40]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021

    2021

  32. [41]

    Oriented r-cnn for object detection

    Xingxing Xie, Gong Cheng, Jiabao Wang, Xiwen Yao, and Junwei Han. Oriented r-cnn for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 3520–3529, 2021

    2021

  33. [42]

    Adaptive rotated con- volution for rotated object detection

    Yifan Pu, Yiru Wang, Zhuofan Xia, Yizeng Han, Yulin Wang, Weihao Gan, Zidong Wang, Shiji Song, and Gao Huang. Adaptive rotated con- volution for rotated object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 6589–6600, 2023

    2023

  34. [43]

    An empirical study of remote sensing pretraining

    Di Wang, Jing Zhang, Bo Du, Gui-Song Xia, and Dacheng Tao. An empirical study of remote sensing pretraining. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 61:1–20, 2022

    2022

  35. [44]

    Run, don’t walk: chasing higher flops for faster neural networks

    Jierun Chen, Shiu-hong Kao, Hao He, Weipeng Zhuo, Song Wen, Chul- Ho Lee, and S-H Gary Chan. Run, don’t walk: chasing higher flops for faster neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 12021–12031, 2023

    2023

  36. [45]

    Rethinking vision transformers for mobilenet size and speed

    Yanyu Li, Ju Hu, Yang Wen, Georgios Evangelidis, Kamyar Salahi, Yanzhi Wang, Sergey Tulyakov, and Jian Ren. Rethinking vision transformers for mobilenet size and speed. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 16889– 16900, 2023

    2023

  37. [46]

    Focal loss for dense object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Doll ´ar. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 2980–2988, 2017

    2017

  38. [47]

    Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks

    Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 39(6):1137– 1149, 2016

    2016

  39. [48]

    A general gaussian heatmap label assignment for arbitrary-oriented object detec- tion

    Zhanchao Huang, Wei Li, Xiang-Gen Xia, and Ran Tao. A general gaussian heatmap label assignment for arbitrary-oriented object detec- tion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 31:1895–1910, 2022

    1910

  40. [49]

    Dynamic coarse-to-fine learning for oriented tiny object detection

    Chang Xu, Jian Ding, Jinwang Wang, Wen Yang, Huai Yu, Lei Yu, and Gui-Song Xia. Dynamic coarse-to-fine learning for oriented tiny object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 7318–7328, 2023

    2023

  41. [50]

    Sparse label assignment for oriented object detection in aerial images

    Qi Ming, Lingjuan Miao, Zhiqiang Zhou, Junjie Song, and Xue Yang. Sparse label assignment for oriented object detection in aerial images. Remote Sensing, 13:2664, 2021

    2021

  42. [51]

    Cfc- net: A critical feature capturing network for arbitrary-oriented object detection in remote-sensing images

    Qi Ming, Lingjuan Miao, Zhiqiang Zhou, and Yunpeng Dong. Cfc- net: A critical feature capturing network for arbitrary-oriented object detection in remote-sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 60:1–14, 2021

    2021

  43. [52]

    Task interleaving and orientation estimation for high- precision oriented object detection in aerial images

    Qi Ming, Lingjuan Miao, Zhiqiang Zhou, Junjie Song, Yunpeng Dong, and Xue Yang. Task interleaving and orientation estimation for high- precision oriented object detection in aerial images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 196:241–255, 2023

    2023

  44. [53]

    Optimization for arbitrary-oriented object detection via representation invariance loss

    Qi Ming, Lingjuan Miao, Zhiqiang Zhou, Xue Yang, and Yunpeng Dong. Optimization for arbitrary-oriented object detection via representation invariance loss. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 19:1–5, 2021

    2021

  45. [54]

    Dynamic anchor learning for arbitrary-oriented object detection

    Qi Ming, Zhiqiang Zhou, Lingjuan Miao, Hongwei Zhang, and Linhao Li. Dynamic anchor learning for arbitrary-oriented object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pages 2355–2363, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.