Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Emergent Equilibrium in All-Optical Single Quantum-Trajectory Ising Machines

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single Gaussian quantum trajectory of a multimode two-photon-driven optical system samples spin configurations according to a Boltzmann distribution of the encoded Ising Hamiltonian, with effective temperature set by pump strength.

desk verdict A plausible but under-evidenced claim of emergent Boltzmann sampling in an all-optical parametric network; worth a referee but not yet a citation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12768 v1 pith:YRS24P4R submitted 2024-12-17 quant-ph physics.comp-phphysics.optics

Jacopo Tosca , Marcello Calvanese Strinati , Claudio Conti , Cristiano Ciuti This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.comp-phphysics.optics PACS 42.50.-p42.65.Yj05.50.+q
keywords IsingmachinequantumtrajectoryGaussianapproximationBoltzmannsamplingopticalparametricoscillatordissipativecouplingemergentthermalequilibriumcombinatorialoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single Gaussian quantum trajectory of a multimode optical system can act as an ultra-fast Boltzmann sampler for Ising problems. In the proposed all-optical machine, N modes are driven by two-photon pumping and coupled only through non-local loss operators that encode the coupling matrix J_ij; at each instant the sign of Re α_i defines an Ising spin. Long-time statistics of these spin configurations follow the Boltzmann law P(E) ∝ $e^{{−E/k_B T_eff}}$, with effective temperature set by the pump strength relative to threshold. This means the ground state becomes the most probable outcome without any electronic feedback, and lower temperatures (and stronger ground-state bias) are reached simply by raising the pump. The result is supported numerically for both spin-glass and binary random graphs.

What carries the argument

The Gaussian quantum trajectory formalism: the state is carried by first moments α_j=⟨a_j⟩ and second moments u_nm, v_nm, evolving under heterodyne unravelling. The Ising interaction enters through non-local jump operators Γ̂^{(3)}_{i,j} = \sqrt{|J_{ij}|}(\hat a_i − (J_{ij}/|J_{ij}|)\hat a_j), combined with one-photon losses; these dissipators, not a Hamiltonian, encode the spin couplings. The threshold pump is obtained from linear stability of the mean-field equations, G_th=(γ−λ_max)/2, and the spin state is read out as sign(Re α_i).

What would settle it

Evolve the same few-mode system with an exact quantum master equation (or with non-Gaussian trajectory corrections) at the parameters of Figs. 3-4 and compare the long-time spin-sign distribution to P(E) ∝ $e^{{−E/k_B T_eff}}$; a measurable departure for N as small as 4-6 would break the claim. Alternatively, in an experiment, verify detailed balance in the inferred spin transitions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Emergent thermal equilibrium in a driven-dissipative all-optical Ising machine: for each single heterodyne trajectory solved at the Gaussian level, the time-marginal distribution of the spin configuration σ_i(t)=sign(Re α_i(t)) is Boltzmann-distributed with the encoded Ising energy, P(E) ∝ $e^{{−E/k_B T_eff}}$. The effective temperature decreases monotonically as the pump G rises above the threshold G_th=(γ−λ_max)/2, and the thermal law persists even in the limit G→0^+. The non-local jump operators Γ̂^{(3)}_{i,j}=\sqrt{|J_{ij}|}(\hat a_i − J_{ij}/|J_{ij}| \hat a_j) together with one-photon losses implement the spin-spin interaction purely dissipatively, with no Hamiltonian coupling between modes.

Load-bearing premise

All numerical evidence comes from Gaussian (first- and second-moment) trajectory equations; if non-Gaussian quantum fluctuations change the sign statistics of Re[α_i], the Boltzmann result may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The most probable sampled configuration after long time is the Ising ground state, with an exponential advantage over higher-energy states.
  • Increasing the pump above threshold lowers the effective temperature, sharpening the Boltzmann distribution toward low-energy solutions without changing the coupling matrix.
  • Because encoding is purely dissipative and readout is instantaneous, sampling is limited by optical timescales rather than feedback electronics.
  • Boltzmann statistics survive at vanishing pump, so thermal sampling does not depend on operating above the oscillation threshold.
  • A single trajectory's time statistics are sufficient; no ensemble of devices or repeated fresh-state runs are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the thermal law persists under non-Gaussian corrections, the same dissipative encoding could be ported to other driven-dissipative platforms (e.g., microwave or exciton-polariton lattices) to obtain fast Boltzmann sampling.
  • The fitted T_eff(G) curve and the energy crossing point of the distributions suggest a calibration procedure: measure P(E) at two pump values and infer the machine's effective temperature, then use it to tune the sampling bias.
  • A direct consequence not tested in the paper: the spin dynamics should satisfy detailed balance; measuring transition rates between spin configurations in the trajectory would provide a stricter test of equilibration than the energy histogram.
  • For practical optimization, the relevant figure is the time-to-solution to reach the ground state with target probability; the paper's single-trajectory statistics imply this time scales with 1/P(E_gs), offering a concrete benchmark for hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies N degenerate optical modes driven by a two-photon pump and coupled through non-local dissipative jump operators that encode an Ising coupling matrix J. Using Gaussian quantum trajectories (SM Eqs. S.4-S.6), the authors define an instantaneous Ising spin from sign(Re[alpha_i(t)]), compute the Ising energy, and construct the time-marginal distribution P(E) from a single long trajectory (t_max = 20,000/gamma, 200,000 samples). They report that P(E) is exponential in E for both SK and K graphs at several pump strengths, extract an effective temperature by fitting, and find that T_eff decreases with pump above threshold. The paper interprets this as emergent thermal equilibrium and proposes the system as an ultrafast all-optical Boltzmann sampler.

Significance. If the configuration-level Boltzmann claim survives scrutiny, the result would be significant: a single quantum trajectory of a dissipative all-optical network would autonomously sample from an Ising distribution with the temperature set by the pump, without feedback. The paper is transparent about the model (jump operators, Gaussian-moment closure), and the SM provides explicit evolution equations, which is a strength. The SK energy histograms are also nontrivial evidence because the two-fold degeneracy is uniform, so an exponential P(E) carries genuine information about the configuration weights. However, the evidence is not yet at the level of the central claim: the K-graph prediction is misstated, and stationarity, ergodicity, fitting quality, and the validity of the Gaussian truncation are not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3, K graph, and accompanying text] The central claim is a Boltzmann distribution over configurations, P(sigma) proportional to exp(-E(sigma)/(k_B T_eff)), but the only numerical evidence shown is the energy histogram P(E). For the K graph, the text states that the energy multiplicity n(E) is strongly non-uniform; therefore the correct Boltzmann prediction is P_B(E) = n(E) exp(-E/(k_B T_eff))/Z, not the formula P_B(E) = exp(-E/(k_B T_eff))/Z that is plotted. As written, the comparison in the right panel of Fig. 3 is not a test of the Boltzmann hypothesis. Please report configuration-level probabilities, or at minimum P(E)/n(E), and test whether configurations inside a degenerate energy shell are equally probable.
  2. [Figs. 3-4 and text on emergent thermal equilibrium] Equilibrium is asserted without stationarity or ergodicity diagnostics. The paper does not report whether the first and second halves of the trajectory give the same histogram, does not give autocorrelation or mixing times, and does not use multiple independent trajectories; with 200,000 samples from a single trajectory, the effective number of independent samples may be much smaller if the spins flip slowly. Please add these diagnostics and error bars based on trajectory-to-trajectory variability.
  3. [Fig. 4 and the effective-temperature fitting procedure] Because T_eff is fitted from the same P(E) that is used to claim equilibrium, the exponential fit has a slope and a normalization as free parameters and cannot by itself validate the Boltzmann form. Please report residuals or goodness-of-fit metrics, compare the fit against alternative functional forms (e.g., a quadratic in E), and provide an independent consistency check, such as T_eff extracted from a different observable or from a split-half analysis of the same trajectory.
  4. [SM Eqs. (S.4)-(S.6) and Conclusions] All numerical results use the Gaussian moment closure for a system with two-photon loss, and the manuscript explicitly defers non-Gaussian noise to future work. Because the central claim concerns the statistics generated by quantum noise, this closure is load-bearing: without a benchmark against an exact master-equation solution for small N, or a quantitative validity criterion, the observed exponential energy statistics could be a truncation artifact. Please add such a benchmark or clearly restrict the claim to the validity regime of the Gaussian approximation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The first line has a malformed bracket, 'langle[H, O rangle]dt'; it should be langle[H, O]rangle dt.
  2. [Fig. 2] The heat maps lack a colorbar label and axis labels; please state explicitly that the color scale is Re(alpha_i) and indicate the time-axis units.
  3. [SM Eq. (S.5)] The terms involving sum_j sqrt(eta) appear to have unbalanced parentheses; please re-check the equation.
  4. [Text after Fig. 3] The statement that for the SK graph 'all different spin configurations are associated to different energies' followed by 'n(E)=2' should be clarified: the factor 2 comes from the global sigma -> -sigma symmetry.
  5. [Main text, larger-N claim] The sentence 'Similar results have however been checked for larger values of N' should be supported by a figure or at least a table in the SM.
  6. [Reference [33]] The bibliography entry contains the phrase 'published on 2024/12/02'; please use a standard citation format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Boltzmann statistics are extracted by fitting P(E), not derived from a fitted parameter, and the Ising coupling enters as an input to the dissipator rather than as an output of the analysis.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the paper's derivation chain. The Ising coupling matrix J is an input parameter of the model, fixed by the choice of dissipators, and is not fitted to the data. The central claim is that the time-marginal distribution P(E) follows a Boltzmann form; the paper fits the effective temperature T_eff from the same histogram, but that is a standard characterization of an observed distribution, not a prediction generated from the fitted value. The exponential form is not guaranteed by the equations of motion: the Gaussian-trajectory SDEs (SM Eqs. S.4-S.6) define a stochastic process over continuous quadratures, and the fact that the sign statistics of Re(alpha_i) approximate a Boltzmann distribution over the discrete Ising configurations is a nontrivial emergent result. The Gaussian approximation is imported from external references [21,22], not from the present authors, and the paper explicitly flags non-Gaussian effects as future work. Self-citations [14,16,31] concern the physical realization and known mean-field limitations; they are not load-bearing for the emergent-equilibrium claim. I also note two evidentiary weaknesses that are not circularity: the numerical evidence tests only the aggregated energy histogram P(E), never configuration-level probabilities P(sigma), and for the K graph the quoted Boltzmann formula P_B(E)=exp(-E/k_B T_eff)/Z omits the energy-shell multiplicity n(E), which the paper itself states is strongly non-uniform. These concerns bear on whether the Boltzmann claim is fully established, but they do not amount to the claim being equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Gaussian approximation, the sign-to-spin mapping, ergodicity of a single trajectory, and the assumed validity of the two-photon Hamiltonian. T_eff is fitted, so it is a free parameter rather than a derived quantity.

free parameters (3)
  • Effective temperature T_eff = Values shown in Fig. 4, decreasing above G/G_th = 1.25; no closed-form expression
    Obtained by least-squares fit of the single-trajectory histogram P(E) to e^{-E/(k_B T_eff)}/Z. The claimed control of temperature by pump is an empirical trend, not a prediction.
  • Normalization constant Z of the fitted Boltzmann distribution = Implicit in fit
    Fitted alongside T_eff to match the histogram; it carries both the truncation and normalization ambiguities.
  • Two-photon loss ratio eta/gamma = 0.1
    Chosen by hand for all reported runs; its effect on the emergent equilibrium and T_eff(G) is not explored.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The quantum state can be truncated to Gaussian first- and second-order moments for the full driven-dissipative dynamics, including the nonlinear two-photon loss channel.
    All simulations use the Gaussian trajectory equations in SM (S.4)-(S.6); non-Gaussian corrections are not checked. The conclusions section lists non-Gaussian noise as future work.
  • ad hoc to paper The sign of Re[alpha_i(t)] at any time defines the Ising spin sigma_i, and the mean-field Ising energy E = -1/2 sum J_ij sigma_i sigma_j is the relevant statistical weight for these signs.
    The paper constructs spin states and energies this way but gives no derivation that the stationary distribution of sign configurations is governed by this Hamiltonian; it is validated only by the fitted exponential.
  • domain assumption A single trajectory sampled for t_max = 20,000/gamma with 200,000 samples is ergodic over the spin configuration space.
    No autocorrelation times, mixing diagnostics, or multiple-trajectory averages are reported; histogram statistics are taken from one trajectory.
  • domain assumption Weak pump depletion and large pump-mode intrinsic loss justify the two-photon driving Hamiltonian H = i hbar G/2 sum(a_i^dag^2 - a_i^2).
    Stated in the theoretical framework for weak pump depletion and large pump mode intrinsic loss without a quantitative check of these conditions for N=10 simulations.
  • standard math Heterodyne unraveling of the Lindblad master equation yields physical single-trajectory statistics.
    This is a standard quantum trajectory method (refs. 21, 22, 25, 26), not introduced or questioned in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent Equilibrium in All-Optical Single Quantum-Trajectory Ising Machines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YRS24P4R

@misc{pith2026241212768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent Equilibrium in All-Optical Single Quantum-Trajectory Ising Machines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YRS24P4R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12768}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the dynamics of multi-mode optical systems driven by two-photon processes and subject to non-local losses, incorporating quantum noise at the Gaussian level. Our findings show that the statistics retrieved from a single Gaussian quantum trajectory exhibits emergent thermal equilibrium governed by an Ising Hamiltonian, encoded in the dissipative coupling between modes. The system's effective temperature is set by the driving strength relative to the oscillation threshold. Given the ultra-short time scales typical of all-optical devices, our study demonstrates that such multi-mode optical systems can operate as ultra-fast Boltzmann samplers, paving the way towards the realization of efficient hardware for combinatorial optimization, with promising applications in machine learning and beyond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top panel: Sketch of the considered system, de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Top panels: Heat map of the field quadratures Re( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Effective temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discovering autonomous quantum error correction via deep reinforcement learning

    quant-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An RL agent with curriculum learning discovered the autonomous QEC code |0L>=|4>, |1L>=|7> with a distance-1 cascaded recovery operator, which the paper claims beats breakeven under single- and double-photon loss.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J

    F. Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J. Phys. A 15, 3241 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Lucas, Ising formulations of many NP problems, Fron- tiers in Physics 2, 5 (2014)

    A. Lucas, Ising formulations of many NP problems, Fron- tiers in Physics 2, 5 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Mohseni, P

    N. Mohseni, P. L. McMahon, and T. Byrnes, Ising ma- chines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 363 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Byrnes, K

    T. Byrnes, K. Yan, and Y. Yamamoto, Accelerated opti- mization problem search using Bose-Einstein condensa- tion, New J. Phys. 13, 113025 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    M. W. Johnson, M. H. S. Amin, S. Gildert, T. Lant- ing, F. Hamze, N. Dickson, R. Harris, A. J. Berkley, J. Johansson, P. Bunyk, E. M. Chapple, C. Enderud, J. P. Hilton, K. Karimi, E. Ladizinsky, N. Ladizinsky, T. Oh, I. Perminov, C. Rich, M. C. Thom, E. Tolkacheva, C. J. S. Truncik, S. Uchaikin, J. Wang, B. Wilson, and G. Rose, Quantum annealing with manu...

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Kim, M.-S

    K. Kim, M.-S. Chang, S. Korenblit, R. Islam, E. E. Edwards, J. K. Freericks, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Quantum simulation of frustrated Ising spins with trapped ions, Nature 465, 590 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    H. Goto, K. Tatsumura, and A. R. Dixon, Combinatorial optimization by simulating adiabatic bifurcations in non- linear Hamiltonian systems, Sci. Adv.5, eaav2372 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    B¨ ohm, G

    F. B¨ ohm, G. Verschaffelt, and G. Van der Sande, A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimization problems, Nat. Commun. 10, 3538 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Tradonsky, I

    C. Tradonsky, I. Gershenzon, V. Pal, R. Chriki, A. A. Friesem, O. Raz, and N. Davidson, Rapid laser solver for the phase retrieval problem, Sci. Adv. 5, 10 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Z. Wang, A. Marandi, K. Wen, R. L. Byer, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Coherent Ising machine based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 88, 063853 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Ambs, Optical computing: A 60-year adventure, Adv

    P. Ambs, Optical computing: A 60-year adventure, Adv. Opt. Technol. 2010, 372652 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Yamamoto, T

    Y. Yamamoto, T. Leleu, S. Ganguli, and H. Mabuchi, Coherent Ising machines-quantum optics and neural net- work perspectives, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 160501 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    J. W. F. Woo and R. Landauer, Fluctuations in a para- metrically excited subharmonic oscillator, IEEE J. Quan- tum Electron QE-7, 435 (1971)

    1971

  6. [14]

    Calvanese Strinati, D

    M. Calvanese Strinati, D. Pierangeli, and C. Conti, All- optical scalable spatial coherent Ising machine, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 054022 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Roychowdhury, A global Lyapunov function for the coherent Ising machine, NOLTA, IEICE 13, 227 (2022)

    J. Roychowdhury, A global Lyapunov function for the coherent Ising machine, NOLTA, IEICE 13, 227 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Calvanese Strinati, L

    M. Calvanese Strinati, L. Bello, E. G. Dalla Torre, and A. Pe’er, Can nonlinear parametric oscillators solve ran- dom Ising models?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 143901 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    K. P. Kalinin and N. G. Berloff, Complexity continuum within Ising formulation of NP problems, Comm. Phys. 5, 20 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    E. Ng, T. Onodera, S. Kako, P. L. McMahon, H. Mabuchi, and Y. Yamamoto, Efficient sampling of ground and low-energy Ising spin configurations with a coherent Ising machine, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013009 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Sakaguchi, K

    H. Sakaguchi, K. Ogata, T. Isomura, S. Utsunomiya, Y. Yamamoto, and K. Aihara, Boltzmann sampling by degenerate optical parametric oscillator network for structure-based virtual screening, Entropy 18, 365 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    B¨ ohm, D

    F. B¨ ohm, D. Alonso-Urquijo, G. Verschaffelt, and G. Van der Sande, Noise-injected analog Ising machines enable ultrafast statistical sampling and machine learn- ing, Nat. Commun. 13, 5847 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Verstraelen and M

    W. Verstraelen and M. Wouters, Temporal coherence of a photon condensate: A quantum trajectory description, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013804 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Verstraelen, R

    W. Verstraelen, R. Rota, V. Savona, and M. Wouters, Gaussian trajectory approach to dissipative phase transi- tions: The case of quadratically driven photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022037 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    R. Rota, F. Minganti, C. Ciuti, and V. Savona, Quan- tum critical regime in a quadratically driven nonlinear photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110405 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Kinsler and P

    P. Kinsler and P. D. Drummond, Quantum dynamics of the parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 43, 6194 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, 2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Verstraelen and M

    W. Verstraelen and M. Wouters, Gaussian quantum tra- jectories for the variational simulation of open quantum- optical systems, Appl. Sci. 8, 1427 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adi- abatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscilla- tors, J

    H. Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adi- abatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscilla- tors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 061015 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Sherrington and S

    D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, Solvable model of a spin-glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975)

    1975

  21. [29]

    Gries and F

    D. Gries and F. B. Schneider, A Logical Approach to Dis- crete Math (Springer-Verlag, 1993)

    1993

  22. [30]

    Leleu, Y

    T. Leleu, Y. Yamamoto, S. Utsunomiya, and K. Aihara, Combinatorial optimization using dynamical phase tran- sitions in driven-dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. E 95, 022118 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Calvanese Strinati, L

    M. Calvanese Strinati, L. Bello, A. Pe’er, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Theory of coupled parametric oscillators beyond coupled Ising spins, Phys. Rev. A 100, 023835 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Foss-Feig, P

    M. Foss-Feig, P. Niroula, J. T. Young, M. Hafezi, A. V. Gorshkov, R. M. Wilson, and M. F. Maghrebi, Emergent equilibrium in many-body optical bistability, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043826 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    V. G. Ramesh, J. Busink, R. E. R. Moesbergen, K. J. H. Peters, P. J. Ackermans, and S. R. K. Rodriguez, Stochastic thermodynamics of a linear optical cavity driven on resonance, ACS Photonics (2024), published on 2024/12/02

    2024

  26. [34]

    H. Goto, Z. Lin, and Y. Nakamura, Boltzmann sampling from the Ising model using quantum heating of coupled nonlinear oscillators, Sci. Rep. 8, 7154 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    M. H. Amin, E. Andriyash, J. Rolfe, B. Kulchytskyy, and R. Melko, Quantum Boltzmann Machine, Phys. Rev. X 6 8, 021050 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Emergent Equilibrium in All-Optical Single Quantum-Trajectory Ising Machines

    F. No´ e, S. Olsson, J. K¨ ohler and, and H. Wu, Boltz- mann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many- body systems with deep learning, Science 365, eaaw1147 (2019). Supplementary Material for the article: “Emergent Equilibrium in All-Optical Single Quantum-Trajectory I...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.