Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions

Bernardo Ballotta; Jacopo Lupi; Leandro Ayarde-Henr\'iquez; Stephen Dooley

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 12 references

Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A subset of ten conformers per anomer retains more than 80% of the Boltzmann population of D-xylopyranose from 298 to 1068 K, defining the kinetically relevant conformational space for pyrolysis kinetics.

desk verdict Useful DLPNO-quality conformer library for both xylopyranose anomers, but the 10-conformer '>80% population' claim is an artifact of renormalizing to the 1%-cutoff-reduced space and needs to be reframed. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12847 v1 pith:IMPW5UXE submitted 2024-12-17 physics.chem-ph

Bernardo Ballotta , Jacopo Lupi , Leandro Ayarde-Henríquez , Stephen Dooley This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-ph

keywords xylopyranoseconformationalanalysishemicellulosepyrolysismetadynamicsGFN2-xTBBoltzmannpopulationmRRHOanomericratio

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which three-dimensional shapes of D-xylopyranose, the sugar unit of hemicellulose, actually exist in the gas phase at temperatures where biomass undergoes fast pyrolysis (298-1068 K). Using a coarse semi-empirical search followed by high-level refinement, it finds 44 distinct conformers of the α anomer and 59 of the β anomer within about 10 kcal/mol of each anomer's lowest energy structure. The authors then use Boltzmann statistics on computed free energies to show that a much smaller set, ten conformers per anomer, always contains more than 80% of the equilibrium population across the whole pyrolysis temperature range. The practical point is that future ab initio kinetic studies of xylopyranose decomposition can restrict themselves to these twenty structures without losing the chemically relevant reactive states. The result also gives a gas-phase α/β anomeric ratio of 61:39 at 298 K, consistent with earlier reports of a slight preference for the α form in the absence of solvent.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the Boltzmann population distribution built on Gibbs free energies rather than bare electronic energies. Populations are computed as $N_i/N = g_i e^{-\Delta G_i/k_B T} / \sum_j g_j e^{-\Delta G_j/k_B T}$ using mRRHO free energies, where the modified rigid-rotor harmonic-oscillator treatment of Grimme supplies anharmonic corrections for hindered hydroxyl rotations and low-frequency ring modes. A population cut-off (discarding conformers below 1% relative abundance) reduces the 44/59 conformer lists to 23/31, and a further selection isolates the ten per anomer that maintain >80% of the population across all three reference temperatures; these selections are then proposed as the input manifold for ab initio kinetic calculations.

What would settle it

Re-run the conformational search with different metadynamics seeds or a longer simulation, or scan the hydroxyl dihedral grid at the rDSD level, and check whether any new conformer appears within about 1 kcal mol−1 of α-C1 (or enters the top ten in free energy at 1068 K). Finding such a missed minimum would directly falsify the claim that the proposed ten conformers per anomer cover >80% of the equilibrium population across the pyrolysis temperature range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a rigorously reduced conformational space for both anomers of D-xylopyranose under pyrolysis conditions. The metadynamics search with the GFN2-xTB Hamiltonian generated 57 α and 73 β candidate minima; after reoptimization and vibrational analysis at the revDSD-PBEP86-D3(BJ) level, and single-point energies at DLPNO-CCSD(T)/F12, 44 α and 59 β distinct conformers remained, spanning roughly 10 kcal mol−1 in zero-point-corrected electronic energy. Using modified rigid-rotor harmonic-oscillator free energies, the authors computed Boltzmann populations at 298, 678, and 1068 K and found that the five lowest-energy conformers hold 95% of the α population at 298 K (97% for β), with the population spreading to higher-energy conformers as temperature rises. From this analysis they define a selection of ten conformers per anomer whose combined relative abundance stays above 80% over the entire 298-1068 K range, and they argue that this twenty-conformer set is the kinetically relevant conformational space for multiconformational ab initio studies of pyrolysis reaction kinetics.

Load-bearing premise

The whole reduction is only as complete as the initial semi-empirical search: if CREST/GFN2-xTB metadynamics missed any low-energy minimum, then the energy ranking, the Boltzmann weights, and the final ten-conformer subsets could all be missing a kinetically important structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Kinetic models of hemicellulose pyrolysis can start with these twenty conformers instead of a single lowest-energy structure, so computed barriers and rate constants will reflect the actual reactive population.
At 1068 K roughly 35% of the population leaves the low-energy manifold; any single-conformer or few-conformer treatment would miss that fraction, so multiconformational rate calculations are necessary at pyrolysis temperatures.
The gas-phase α/β ratio of 61:39 at 298 K provides a clean benchmark for force-field and implicit-solvent models, which must reproduce this intrinsic preference before adding solvation.
The temperature dependence of relative free energies identifies which conformers change rank with temperature, guiding where explicit anharmonicity or hindered-rotor treatments matter most.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same reduced-set workflow could be applied to xylofuranose or to glucopyranose to test whether ten conformers per monomer is a general rule for pyranose sugars at high temperature, or an accident of xylose's symmetry.
The population cut-off is thermodynamic, not kinetic; whether the ten-conformer set also carries the reaction flux depends on transition-state energies, so a natural next test is to compute key decomposition rate constants with the full and reduced sets and compare the resulting product yields.
Because the paper notes solvent reverses the α/β preference, adding implicit solvation or microsolvated water could shift the ten-conformer selection; a useful extension would map how the subset changes with water activity relevant to condensed-phase pyrolysis.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a solid, useful computational study, and the main deliverable—a DLPNO-quality conformer library with temperature-dependent populations for both xylopyranose anomers—is worth having. But the paper's headline convenience claim is currently overstated. The 10-conformer subsets that 'remain above 80%' are 80% of the truncated space left after removing conformers below 1% population, not 80% of the full Boltzmann population. By the paper's own Table 6, at 1068 K you need 22 α-conformers to reach 92% and 26 β-conformers to reach 85%. The text and conclusions don't consistently carry the 'renormalized' caveat, so a reader will walk away thinking ten conformers capture four-fifths of the real population at pyrolysis temperatures. They don't. That's a fixable framing problem, but it's the central practical claim, so it needs to be fixed before anyone builds a kinetic model on it.

What is genuinely new: no earlier study gives both anomers at this level (rDSD geometries/frequencies, DLPNO-CCSD(T)/F12 single points, mRRHO thermochemistry) over 298–1068 K. The 44/59 conformer sets, the puckering labels, and the explicit population tables are a useful reference. The anomeric ratio check against experiment (61/39 in favor of α) is a reasonable validation, and the population calculation is definitional, not a fit, so there is no circularity problem.

Soft spots beyond the normalization issue: the SI is missing from the version I saw, including Cartesian coordinates and the numerical thermochemical tables, so independent verification is impossible right now; there are broken cross-references and at least one temperature inconsistency (678 vs 673 K); and there is no uncertainty estimate on the populations, which matters because the mRRHO treatment and the 0.982 frequency scale factor carry real model dependence. The completeness of the CREST/GFN2-xTB search is the usual unknown; it would be good to see at least a statement about replicate sampling or a test of the iMTD-GC parameters, but I wouldn't call that a fatal flaw—it's inherent to this kind of conformational exploration.

Bottom line: this paper deserves referee time. The calculation is careful, the data are useful, and the main flaw is a reporting/normalization problem rather than a methodological one. For a reader building multipath pyrolysis kinetics, the work is valuable even after the caveat is made explicit—you just need to either soften the 10-conformer claim or present it honestly as '10 conformers capture >80% of the reduced space, and the reduced space itself retains roughly 94% of the full population at 1068 K.' I'd send it to review, ask for the SI, and ask for a rewrite of Sections 3.3 and the abstract to align with Table 6.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a computational conformational analysis of alpha- and beta-D-xylopyranose in the gas phase over the temperature range 298–1068 K. Conformers are generated with the CREST/GFN2-xTB metadynamics workflow, reoptimized and characterized at the revDSD-PBEP86-D3(BJ)/jun-cc-pVTZ level, with single-point energies refined at the DLPNO-CCSD(T)-F12/cc-pVTZ-F12 level. Thermochemical properties are computed with the mRRHO approximation, and Boltzmann populations are derived from relative Gibbs free energies. The authors report 44 alpha and 59 beta conformers, identify a 1% population cutoff that reduces the space to 23 and 31 conformers, and recommend a subset of 10 conformers per anomer as "kinetically relevant" for future multiconformational kinetic studies. They also report an anomeric ratio of 61:39 favoring alpha at 298 K, consistent with some prior gas-phase studies.

Significance. If the results are validated, the paper offers a useful conformer library and thermochemical dataset for xylopyranose, a key hemicellulose model compound. The electronic-structure protocol is high in quality for this class of molecules: double-hybrid DFT geometries and frequencies with DLPNO-CCSD(T)-F12 single-point energies represent a defensible level of theory, and the Boltzmann analysis is standard. The comparison of the anomeric ratio with literature values is a welcome check. However, the central practical deliverable—the claim that 10 conformers per anomer capture more than 80% of the conformational population—is, as stated in the abstract and conclusions, not supported by the paper's own full-population data. This overstatement, together with the absence of the supplementary tables and coordinates that the text repeatedly references, makes the manuscript unsuitable for acceptance in its current form.

major comments (3)

[Abstract, Section 3.2, Section 3.3, Table 6, Figure 9] The claim that 10 conformers per anomer maintain more than 80% of the Boltzmann population across 298–1068 K is inconsistent with the paper's own Table 6. At 1068 K, the table states that 22 alpha conformers (alpha-C1 to alpha-C22) are needed to describe 92% of the alpha population, and 26 beta conformers (beta-C1 to beta-C26) are needed to describe 85% of the beta population. Because these are cumulative subsets built from the most populated conformers, ten conformers cannot contain more than 80% of the full Boltzmann population at that temperature. The only interpretation consistent with Figure 9 is that the percentages are renormalized within the reduced conformational space obtained after discarding conformers with relative population below 1%, as stated in Section 3.2. The abstract and Conclusions present the 10-conformer, >80% statement without this caveat, overstating the practical recommendation. Please either revise the claim to specify the reduced-space normalization explicitly or recompute the coverage with respect to the full 44/59 conformer sets and report the actual number of conformers needed to reach a given coverage.
[Section 2.1 and Section 3.1] The completeness of the GFN2-xTB/CREST conformational search is not independently verified. The paper notes that a comprehensive search is computationally prohibitive and relies on the iMTD-GC algorithm, but no convergence check is reported (for example, repetition with different random seeds, comparison with an independent sampling method, or a plot of the number of new conformers versus simulation time). Since every downstream quantity—the energy ordering, the Boltzmann populations, and the proposed 10-conformer subsets—depends on the identified conformer set being effectively complete within the energy window of interest, the authors should provide some evidence of convergence or explicitly characterize the sensitivity of the reported populations to possible missing conformers.
[Throughout (Sections 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 2.2, Figure 8 caption)] The manuscript contains multiple unresolved cross-references to SI tables: "Table ??" in Section 3.1.1, "Table ??, reported in SI" in Section 3.1.2, "The SI tables ??, ?? report the numerical values" in Section 3.1.3, and "the Cartesian coordinates of the optimized geometries are reported in the SI" in Section 3.3. The SI is not included in the arXiv submission, so the numerical thermochemical tables and Cartesian coordinates on which the population analysis is based cannot be inspected. Without these data, the conformer assignments and the key numerical results (including the 10-conformer coverage) are not independently verifiable. Please provide the SI or include the essential numerical tables in the main text for review.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3.2] The word "neglectible" should be "negligible" in the sentence describing the population deviation after applying the cutoff.
[Section 4] The temperature is given as "673K" in the Conclusions paragraph ("at 298 K, 673K and 1068 K"), whereas 678 K is used throughout the rest of the manuscript; please unify.
[Section 3.1.3] The sentence introducing Table 5 refers to "the conformer structures most affected by entropic effects," but Table 5 is a list of conformer labels rather than structures; please rephrase for clarity.
[Section 2.2] The vibrational frequency scale factor of 0.982 is said to be "computed using the FREQ program." Please specify the underlying reference data and the exact functional/basis set for which this scale factor was derived, and cite the corresponding entry in the FREQ database.
[Figure 7] In the reproduced version of Figure 7, the horizontal lines indicating the population subsets are difficult to read; please ensure sufficient resolution and contrast in the final version.
[Table 4] The row for Schmidt et al. in the gas phase reports Delta-G = 0.05 kcal/mol favoring alpha (52/48), while the text in Section 1 states that "experimental values slightly favored the beta form"; this discrepancy between the table and the narrative should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the conformational populations and 10-conformer subsets are computed directly from the authors' own free energies, with an external anomeric-ratio comparison as an independent check.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: CREST/GFN2-xTB sampling, rDSD optimization and frequencies, DLPNO single-point energies, mRRHO thermochemistry, and Boltzmann populations from relative Gibbs free energies via Ni/N = g_i exp(-Ei/kBT) / sum_i g_i exp(-Ei/kBT). Each stage is an independent calculation; no parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted. The 10-conformer subset is selected from the computed populations, and its summed population is then reported; this is a definitional application of the authors' own free energies, not a fit and not a self-citation. The anomeric ratio 61:39 at 298 K is computed from the same populations and compared with, not adjusted to, literature values in Table 4, providing an external benchmark. The only self-citations (refs. 14 and 18) are background on xylopyranose pyrolysis and do not supply any uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted parameter. The paper's stated limitation that comprehensive exploration of the entire conformational space is 'computationally prohibitive' (Introduction, Section 2.1) is a completeness caveat, not a circular step. A possible reader concern that the 'total relative population remains above 80%' statement for the 10-conformer subsets is evaluated on the 1%-cutoff, renormalized reduced space (Sections 3.2 and 3.3) is an internal-consistency or presentation issue, not a circularity: the reduced-space populations still derive from the same Boltzmann formula, and the text discloses the renormalization. No quoted equation reduces to its own input, and no load-bearing argument rests on a self-citation. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard quantum-chemical assumptions (level of theory, harmonic/mRRHO thermochemistry) and on the completeness of the conformational search. No new physical entity is postulated. The main hand-set parameters are the vibrational scale factor and the population cut-off, both standard or transparently declared.

free parameters (4)

Vibrational frequency scale factor = 0.982
Applied to ZPE and thermal corrections to account for harmonic approximation error; taken from the FREQ program's empirical database, not fitted to xylopyranose data.
Population cut-off = 1%
Hand-chosen threshold used to discard conformers with relative population below 1%, reducing 44 to 23 alpha and 59 to 31 beta conformers (Section 3.2).
Metadynamics bias parameters (k_i, alpha) = not reported
Parameters in Eq. 1 that control the biasing potential in CREST; values are not given in the text, though defaults in CREST are implied.
mRRHO symmetry numbers and hindered rotor temperatures = not reported
The mRRHO corrections (Section 2.2) require symmetry numbers and rotational temperatures for each internal rotor; these values are not listed, so the exact entropy corrections are not reproducible from the text.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption GFN2-xTB provides a potential energy surface reliable enough for CREST metadynamics to locate all chemically relevant conformers.
Invoked in Section 2.1; if false, the conformer sets are incomplete.
domain assumption Harmonic oscillator frequencies scaled by 0.982, with Grimme's mRRHO corrections, give accurate free energies up to 1068 K.
Invoked in Section 2.2; anharmonicity at high temperature is handled by an empirical correction rather than explicit anharmonic calculations.
domain assumption Gas-phase conformer populations are the appropriate ensemble for pyrolysis kinetics.
Stated in the Introduction and Conclusions; real pyrolysis involves condensed phases and reactive intermediates, so gas-phase populations are a proxy.
standard math The Boltzmann distribution over the found conformers is the correct weighting for reactivity.
Standard statistical mechanics, Section 2.3; assumes conformational interconversion is fast relative to reaction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IMPW5UXE

@misc{pith2026241212847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IMPW5UXE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12847}
}

abstract

Xylopyranose is the principal monosaccharide unit of hemicellulose, one of the three major biopolymers of lignocellulosic biomass. Understanding its decomposition mechanism is increasingly relevant for thermochemical biorefinery research such as pyrolysis. Significant efforts have been made to study its chemical and structural properties using both computational and experimental methods. However, due to its high structural flexibility and numerous hydroxyl groups, various metastable conformers arise. In this work, we performed a computational exploration of the conformational space of both anomeric forms, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ , of D-xylopyranose using the semi-empirical GFN2-xTB method in conjunction with metadynamics and density functional theory simulations for structural optimization and vibrational analysis. Xylopyranose conformers free energy and enthalpy variations are analyzed across temperatures typical of fast biomass pyrolysis (298-1068 K), with the Boltzmann population distribution of the most populated conformers determined. This study provides a detailed computational analysis of the conformational space and thermochemistry of xylopyranose. Additionally, 44 and 59 conformers of the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ anomers were found, for both of which a selection of 10 conformers based on Boltzmann population distribution analysis is performed to reduce the conformational space for ab initio studies of the pyrolysis reaction kinetics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions

Xylose predominantly exists in the pyranose form in both the condensed and gas phases 2,3. The pyranose struc- tures have two anomers, α and β, distinguished by the position of the hydroxyl group at the chiral carbon. In the planar Ha- worth projection, the α anomer has the hydroxyl group pointing downwards, in an axial position, while in the β anomer, it...

work page Pith review arXiv
[2]

As for β-D-xylopyranose, 23 conformers show high free energy variations throughout the relative energy range up to about 9 kcal mol−1. It can be observed that for β-D-xylopyranose most of these structures are 14 chair in the lower energy range up to about 4 kcal mol−1, while for higher energies the conformations with higher energy changes are three boat a...

work page 2013
[241]

Clark, J

37 T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, G. W. Spitznagel and P. V. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. , 1983, 4, 294–301. 38 B. Hu, Q. Lu, X.-y . Jiang, X.-c. Dong, M.-s. Cui, C.-q. Dong and Y.-p. Yang, Energy & Fuels , 2017, 31, 8291–8299. 39 G. Santra, N. Sylvetsky and J. M. Martin, J. Phys. Chem. A , 2019, 123, 5129–5143. 40 S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich and L. Goerigk, J. ...

work page 1983
[440]

Grimme, Chemistry – A European Journal , 2012, 18, 9955–

56 S. Grimme, Chemistry – A European Journal , 2012, 18, 9955–

work page 2012
[1358]

9 J. C. Boeyens, J. Chem. Crystallogr ., 1978, 8, 317–320. 10 I. Peña, S. Mata, A. Martín, C. Cabezas, A. M. Daly and J. L. Alonso, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2013, 15, 18243–18248. 11 X. Zhou, W. Li, R. Mabon and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy T echnol., 2017, 5, 52–79. 12 X. Zhou, W. Li, R. Mabon and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1240–1260. 1...

work page 1978
[2001]

Pfaendtner, X

61 J. Pfaendtner, X. Yu and L. J. Broadbelt, Theor . Chem. Acc., 2007, 118, 881–898. 62 P. Y. Ayala and H. B. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. , 1998, 108, 2314–2325. 63 R. B. McClurg, R. C. Flagan and W. A. Goddard III, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 6675–6680. 64 R. B. McClurg, J. Chem. Phys. , 1999, 111, 7163–7164. + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 1–13 | 13

work page 2007
[2007]

2 S. J. Angyal, Angew. Chem., 1969, 8, 157–166. 3 A. Hordvik, Acta Chem. Scand , 1971, 25, 2175–2182. 4 R. K. Schmidt, M. Karplus and J. W. Brady ,J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 1996, 118, 541–546. 5 C. Höög and G. Widmalm, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 6375–

work page 1969
[4720]

17 T. Kan, V. Strezov and T. J. Evans,Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 57, 1126–1140. 18 J. Lupi, L. Ayarde-Henríquez, M. Kelly and S. Dooley , J. Phys. Chem. A, 2024, 128, 1009–1024. 19 A. K. Burnham, X. Zhou and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy Fuels , 2015, 29, 2906–2918. 20 S. Hameed, A. Sharma, V. Pareek, H. Wu and Y. Yu, Biomass Bioenergy, 2019, 123, 104–1...

work page 2016

Show all 12 references

[6379]

6 H. B. Mayes, L. J. Broadbelt and G. T. Beckham, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1008–1022. 7 J. Iglesias-Fernández, L. Raich, A. Ardèvol and C. Rovira, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 1167–1177. + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 1–13 | 11 8 D. Cremer and J. Pople, J. Am. Chem. ...

2014
[6674]

Klemm, B

58 D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H.-P. Fink and A. Bohn,Angew. Chem., 2005, 44, 3358–3393. 59 M. Karplus and J. A. McCammon, Nat. Struct. Biol. , 2002, 9, 646–652. 60 A. R. Leach, Molecular Modelling: Principles and Application , Pearson education,

2005
[7596]

26 L. P. Viegas, J. Phys. Chem. A , 2018, 122, 9721–9732. 27 L. P. Viegas, J. Phys. Org. Chem. , 2023, 36, e4470. 28 Z. Yang, X. Lin, J. Zhou, M. Hu, Y. Gai, W. Zhao, B. long and W. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 40437–40444. 29 K. H. Møller, R. V. Otkjær, N. Hyttinen, T. Kurtén an...

2018
[9964]

57 A. L. L. East and L. Radom, J. Chem. Phys. , 1997, 106, 6655–

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Ab Initio Conformational Analysis of $\alpha$/$\beta$-D-Xylopyranose at Pyrolysis Conditions

Xylose predominantly exists in the pyranose form in both the condensed and gas phases 2,3. The pyranose struc- tures have two anomers, α and β, distinguished by the position of the hydroxyl group at the chiral carbon. In the planar Ha- worth projection, the α anomer has the hydroxyl group pointing downwards, in an axial position, while in the β anomer, it...

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [2]

As for β-D-xylopyranose, 23 conformers show high free energy variations throughout the relative energy range up to about 9 kcal mol−1. It can be observed that for β-D-xylopyranose most of these structures are 14 chair in the lower energy range up to about 4 kcal mol−1, while for higher energies the conformations with higher energy changes are three boat a...

work page 2013

[3] [241]

Clark, J

37 T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, G. W. Spitznagel and P. V. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. , 1983, 4, 294–301. 38 B. Hu, Q. Lu, X.-y . Jiang, X.-c. Dong, M.-s. Cui, C.-q. Dong and Y.-p. Yang, Energy & Fuels , 2017, 31, 8291–8299. 39 G. Santra, N. Sylvetsky and J. M. Martin, J. Phys. Chem. A , 2019, 123, 5129–5143. 40 S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich and L. Goerigk, J. ...

work page 1983

[4] [440]

Grimme, Chemistry – A European Journal , 2012, 18, 9955–

56 S. Grimme, Chemistry – A European Journal , 2012, 18, 9955–

work page 2012

[5] [1358]

9 J. C. Boeyens, J. Chem. Crystallogr ., 1978, 8, 317–320. 10 I. Peña, S. Mata, A. Martín, C. Cabezas, A. M. Daly and J. L. Alonso, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2013, 15, 18243–18248. 11 X. Zhou, W. Li, R. Mabon and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy T echnol., 2017, 5, 52–79. 12 X. Zhou, W. Li, R. Mabon and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1240–1260. 1...

work page 1978

[6] [2001]

Pfaendtner, X

61 J. Pfaendtner, X. Yu and L. J. Broadbelt, Theor . Chem. Acc., 2007, 118, 881–898. 62 P. Y. Ayala and H. B. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. , 1998, 108, 2314–2325. 63 R. B. McClurg, R. C. Flagan and W. A. Goddard III, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 6675–6680. 64 R. B. McClurg, J. Chem. Phys. , 1999, 111, 7163–7164. + P V S O B M / B N F < Z F B S > < W P M > 1–13 | 13

work page 2007

[7] [2007]

2 S. J. Angyal, Angew. Chem., 1969, 8, 157–166. 3 A. Hordvik, Acta Chem. Scand , 1971, 25, 2175–2182. 4 R. K. Schmidt, M. Karplus and J. W. Brady ,J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 1996, 118, 541–546. 5 C. Höög and G. Widmalm, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 6375–

work page 1969

[8] [4720]

17 T. Kan, V. Strezov and T. J. Evans,Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 57, 1126–1140. 18 J. Lupi, L. Ayarde-Henríquez, M. Kelly and S. Dooley , J. Phys. Chem. A, 2024, 128, 1009–1024. 19 A. K. Burnham, X. Zhou and L. J. Broadbelt, Energy Fuels , 2015, 29, 2906–2918. 20 S. Hameed, A. Sharma, V. Pareek, H. Wu and Y. Yu, Biomass Bioenergy, 2019, 123, 104–1...

work page 2016