Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

New Physics at the Muon (Synchrotron) Ion Collider: MuSIC for several scales

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the proposed muon-ion collider MuSIC can surpass current experimental limits in searches for leptoquarks, muonphilic Z' bosons, axion-like particles, and sterile neutrinos.

desk verdict First MuSIC BSM sensitivity study, with a solid LFV/sterile-neutrino core but an under-specified coherent-scattering treatment that likely overestimates the high-mass Z' and ALP reach. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13289 v1 pith:LIQ3CTPQ submitted 2024-12-17 hep-ph hep-ex

Hooman Davoudiasl , Hongkai Liu , Roman Marcarelli , Yotam Soreq , Sokratis Trifinopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords muon-ioncollidernewphysicssearchesleptoquarkmuonphilicZ'bosonaxion-likeparticlessterileneutrinodipoleportalcoherentscatteringdisplacedvertex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a proposed muon-ion collider called MuSIC, built with a TeV-scale muon beam colliding with protons or heavy ions, can discover physics beyond the Standard Model. It argues that the answer is yes for four benchmark scenarios: a leptoquark that mixes muons and taus, a new vector boson that couples mainly to muons, axion-like particles coupled to photons, and a heavy sterile neutrino reached through a transition magnetic moment. In each case the paper derives projected exclusion limits and compares them with current constraints and with other planned experiments, concluding that MuSIC either outperforms those competitors or fills a complementary region of parameter space. The significance would be a new physics program at a facility that is already being discussed as the successor to the next-generation electron-ion facility and as a stepping stone to a future multi-TeV muon collider.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the combination of a muon beam's valence leptonic partons with coherent photon scattering off heavy ions. When the ion stays intact, the virtual photon flux is enhanced by $Z^2$, which boosts production of muonphilic $Z'$ bosons and axion-like particles; the large beam energies then give the produced particles high boosts toward the far-backward detector, enabling displaced-vertex searches. For leptoquarks and sterile neutrinos, the muon's valence lepton content initiates tree-level partonic processes whose backgrounds are suppressed by the detector's rapidity coverage and by kinematic cuts. The paper uses effective-photon and lepton-parton-distribution approximations, together with a benchmark detector model inherited from electron-ion collider studies, to turn these mechanisms into projected exclusion curves.

What would settle it

Measure the elastic nuclear form factor of gold (or the chosen ion) at squared momentum transfers corresponding to $Z'$ masses between 1 and 20 GeV, or run a fixed-target muon-on-gold test beam and look for the predicted displaced di-muon rate; if the coherent rate falls below the $Z^2$-scaled prediction, the paper's $Z'$ and ALP reach projections are too optimistic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that MuSIC, a future muon-ion collider with a 1 TeV muon beam and 400 inverse femtobarns of integrated luminosity, offers a distinctive and competitive window onto new physics across widely different mass scales. For a 2 TeV leptoquark, the clean muon beam's valence lepton content initiates a tree-level muon-to-tau conversion process that can beat both the current and high-luminosity hadron-collider reach. For a muonphilic $Z'$ between the dimuon threshold and about 20 GeV, coherent scattering from gold ions multiplies the production cross section by $Z^2$, and a far-backward spectrometer picks up the boosted displaced di-muon decays. The same coherent photon-fusion mechanism lets MuSIC probe axion-like particles up to roughly 200 GeV and match the effective Higgs-photon coupling, while the dipole-mediated up-scattering of neutrinos to sterile neutrinos can extend current bounds to masses near 500 GeV. The conclusion is that this facility could simultaneously serve as a new-physics hunter and as a demonstrator for muon-collider technology.

Load-bearing premise

The projected reach for the $Z'$ and axion-like-particle searches assumes that heavy ions stay intact during the collision so that the production rate is enhanced by the square of the ion's atomic number at all the momentum transfers needed; if the ion breaks up or the enhancement drops at higher mediator masses, those limits weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A MuSIC with a 1 TeV muon beam would probe a muonphilic $Z'$ from the dimuon threshold to about 20 GeV in a region currently unconstrained by existing experiments.
  • The same collider would extend axion-like-particle sensitivity in the photon-coupling plane to ALP masses around 200 GeV, beyond what existing beam-dump and electron-positron bounds cover.
  • For a 2 TeV leptoquark coupling to bottom quarks and the second and third lepton generations, MuSIC could surpass current hadron-collider limits on the relevant couplings.
  • Sterile-neutrino searches via the dipole operator could reach masses up to about 500 GeV, extending present bounds and competing with future hadron and lepton colliders in different mass ranges.
  • The effective Higgs-photon coupling could be probed in the same photon-fusion search, giving the facility a Standard Model physics measurement alongside its new-physics reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coherent $Z^2$ enhancement holds at the momentum transfers needed for $Z'$ masses up to about 20 GeV, the same far-backward strategy should also apply to other photon-coupled mediators such as dark photons and millicharged particles, a direction the paper does not quantify.
  • The muon beam's valence leptonic content suggests that other lepton-flavor-sensitive searches studied for future electron-proton colliders, such as charged-lepton-flavor-violating contact interactions, could transfer to MuSIC with comparable or better reach.
  • Because the paper treats muon and anti-muon beams as nearly interchangeable for these channels, a future design could optimize the beam choice for cost or cooling rather than for this physics program.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that a future Muon (Synchrotron) Ion Collider (MuSIC) with a TeV-scale muon beam and 400 fb^-1 would provide competitive or complementary sensitivity in four BSM scenarios: LFV leptoquarks (Section 2), muonphilic Z' bosons produced by muon bremsstrahlung off gold ions (Section 3), axion-like particles produced by coherent photon fusion (Section 4), and heavy sterile neutrinos via a transition magnetic moment (Section 5). The projections are compared to HL-LHC, muon beam dumps, FCC-ee, LHeC, and other future experiments. The central technical ingredients are event generation with MadGraph and LePDF, displaced-vertex and prompt-search strategies, and a claimed Z^2 coherent-scattering enhancement for the ion-beam processes.

Significance. If the coherent-scattering modeling is correct, this is a useful first BSM phenomenology study for a proposed post-EIC facility, and it connects the MuSIC concept to ongoing discussions about future muon and lepton-ion colliders. The paper is transparent about several idealized assumptions, such as background-free displaced searches, perfect photon efficiency, and fixed detector acceptances, and it uses public tools (LePDF, HighPT, MadGraph) rather than proprietary code. The standout claims are the high-mass reach of the Z' search and the ALP reach up to ~200 GeV, both of which rest on the ion-coherence enhancement; the lack of a quantified nuclear form factor or coherence cut makes these particular predictions load-bearing and currently unsupported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (3.4)] The cross section d^2 sigma(mu Au -> mu Au Z')/d gamma d eta used in Eq. (3.4) is never derived, and no nuclear form factor or coherence cutoff is specified. For gold (R_A ~ 7 fm), coherent scattering requires momentum transfers Q^2 << (1/R_A)^2 ~ (28 MeV)^2, while the claimed reach extends to m_Z' ~ 20 GeV, which requires virtualities orders of magnitude above this scale. The text acknowledges that the Z^2 enhancement is reduced as the emitted mass grows, but it does not quantify the suppression. The high-mass portion of the MuSIC exclusion curve in Fig. 2, and hence the central comparison with the 1.5 TeV beam-dump benchmark, depends on this missing input and could be substantially overestimated.
  2. [Section 4] The ALP search via coherent photon fusion mu Au -> mu Au a uses the same Z^2 enhancement as the Z' search, but no equivalent-photon flux factor or coherence condition is given. The reach up to m_a ~ 200 GeV (and the displaced search around m_a ~ 1 GeV) is therefore not supported by a documented calculation. Inserting a realistic gold form factor would likely suppress the high-mass ALP reach, changing the comparison with LHeC and FCC-ee in the upper part of Fig. 3.
  3. [Appendix A] The kinematical distributions in Fig. 5 are normalized to unit area, so they cannot validate the absolute cross sections used in the Z' and ALP projections. If the normalization itself is already computed after imposing a form-factor or coherence cut, that cut should be stated explicitly; if not, the integral in Eq. (3.4) is ambiguous.
  4. [Section 6] The concluding claim that MuSIC 'either outperforms the competing future experiments or complements them' is based directly on the four scenarios analyzed, but for the Z' and ALP cases it inherits the unresolved coherent-scattering issue. The statement should be qualified until the form-factor dependence is quantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, detector discussion] The text says charged particles with pseudo-rapidities eta < 6 will be reconstructed within the B0 spectrometer; for the far-backward (negative-eta) region this should likely read eta < -6 or |eta| > 6, and the current wording is confusing.
  2. [Appendix B, caption] The bottom-left panel caption refers to the 'azimuthal angle between the missing energy and the photo'; this should be 'photon'.
  3. [Table 1] The header 'Search F eatures' contains a typo and should read 'Search Features'.
  4. [Section 5, comparison text] The sentence 'The MuSIC is comparable to the LEP1 with 200 pb^-1 [126] (~4 million Z bosons [142])' is awkward; the cited integrated luminosity and Z-boson count should be clarified, since LEP1's total luminosity is usually quoted as ~200 pb^-1 per experiment and the number of Z bosons is about 4 million per experiment.
  5. [Figure 2 and text] The experiment is referred to as both 'FASERnu2' (figure) and 'FASERnu' (text); the notation should be unified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the MuSIC projections are independent computations from explicit Lagrangians and standard cross-section machinery; self-citations appear only as non-load-bearing tools.

full rationale

The paper's four projections are fresh calculations based on explicit simplified Lagrangians (Eqs. (2.1), (3.1), (4.1), (5.1)) and standard cross-section, PDF, and Monte Carlo machinery. The MuSIC beam parameters are taken from external accelerator studies [17,18]; the comparison projections (HL-LHC via HighPT, the beam-dump study [42], and the LHeC/FCC-ee ALP curves [99,100]) are independent published results. Self-citations appear in non-load-bearing roles: LePDF [63] is a public code used to obtain lepton PDFs whose formalism originates in [61,62]; [35] supplies the EIC ALP comparison curve rather than the MuSIC calculation; and [34] motivates the minimum decay length cut, while the background-free assumption is an independent modeling choice. None of these citations is invoked to forbid alternatives or to import a uniqueness theorem. The only notable weakness is the unstated nuclear form factor or coherence cut in the Z' and ALP coherent-scattering estimates; that is a correctness and modeling risk, not a circular reduction, because the reach curves are not set equal to an input assumption by construction. Even if the form-factor modeling is wrong, the claims would be overestimated rather than true by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce any new particles or forces; it studies simplified BSM models from the literature. Its free parameters are mainly assumed detector efficiencies and cuts, all explicitly stated. The key unstated assumptions are the validity of the lepton PDF framework for muons and the coherent scattering treatment for ions.

free parameters (5)
  • b-tagging efficiency = 80%
    Assumed acceptance for b-jets in the leptoquark search, chosen by hand based on ATLAS performance (Sec. 2).
  • tau hadronic acceptance = 75%
    Assumed 'medium' working point for tau hadronic decay identification (Sec. 2).
  • muon detection efficiency = 86%
    Assumed efficiency for detecting dimuon final states in the Z' displaced search (Sec. 3).
  • photon detection efficiency = 100%
    The paper assumes 'a perfect photon detection efficiency' for the ALP search (Sec. 4), an optimistic simplification.
  • displaced vertex inner cut = 1 mm
    ℓ_min chosen to reject prompt backgrounds in the Z' search (Sec. 3), assumed to render the search background-free.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The lepton PDFs from LePDF correctly describe the partonic content of a 1 TeV muon beam.
    The leptoquark and Z' cross sections depend on treating the muon as a source of valence leptons and electroweak bosons via lepton PDFs (Sec. 2, 3).
  • domain assumption The equivalent photon approximation with coherent Z^2 enhancement is valid for muon-gold scattering in the kinematic regime of interest.
    The Z' and ALP production cross sections rely on coherent scattering off intact gold nuclei (Sec. 3, 4), but no form factor or coherence condition is shown.
  • domain assumption The displaced vertex searches are background-free after the ℓ_min cut.
    The Z' search assumes ℓ_min=1 mm suffices to eliminate prompt backgrounds, and the ALP displaced search assumes negligible backgrounds (Sec. 3, 4).
  • domain assumption The dominant ALP prompt background is light-by-light scattering and can be controlled to yield a clean signal.
    The ALP prompt search assumes perfect photon detection and a reducible light-by-light background (Sec. 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New Physics at the Muon (Synchrotron) Ion Collider: MuSIC for several scales." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LIQ3CTPQ

@misc{pith2026241213289,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New Physics at the Muon (Synchrotron) Ion Collider: MuSIC for several scales},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LIQ3CTPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13289}
}
read the original abstract

A Muon (Synchrotron) Ion Collider (MuSIC) can be the successor to the Electron-Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory, as well as the ideal demonstrator facility for a future multi-TeV Muon Collider. Besides its rich nuclear physics and Standard Model particle physics programs, in this work we show that the MuSIC with a TeV-scale muon beam offers also a unique opportunity to probe New Physics. In particular, the relevant searches have the potential to surpass current experimental limits and explore new regimes of the parameter space for a variety of Beyond the Standard Model scenarios including: lepton-flavor violating leptoquarks, muonphilic vector boson interactions, axion-like particles coupling to photons, and heavy sterile neutrinos. Depending on the particular case, the sensitivity of the searches in the MuSIC may span a wide range of energy scales, namely from sub-GeV particles to the few TeV New Physics mediators. Our analysis demonstrates that the MuSIC can strike a powerful chord in the search for New Physics, thanks to unique combination of features that amplify its capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Forward Neutrino Flux and its Secondaries at a 10 TeV Muon Collider

    hep-ph 2026-08

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abada et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 474

    2019

  2. [2]

    Abada et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2 , Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 261–623

    2019

  3. [3]

    Abada et al., FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3 , Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 755–1107

    2019

  4. [4]

    Stratakis et al., A Muon Collider Facility for Physics Discovery, 2203.08033

    Muon Collidercollaboration, D. Stratakis et al., A Muon Collider Facility for Physics Discovery, 2203.08033

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider , Eur

    C. Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 864, [2303.08533]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Accettura et al., Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC) , 2407.12450

    International Muon Collidercollaboration, C. Accettura et al., Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC) , 2407.12450

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Accardi et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all , Eur

    A. Accardi et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all , Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 268, [ 1212.1701]. – 14 – 50 100 150 2000.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 -2 -1 0 1 2 30.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0 π/4 π/2 3π/4 π 5π/4 3π/2 7π/4 2π0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Figure 6 . Unity-no...

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    E. C. Aschenauer et al., eRHIC Design Study: An Electron-Ion Collider at BNL , 1409.1633

    arXiv

Show all 167 references
  1. [9]

    I. F. Ginzburg, Physics at future e p, gamma p (linac-ring) and mu p colliders , Turk. J. Phys. 22 (1998) 607–610

    1998

  2. [10]

    Sultansoy, The PostHERA era: Brief review of future lepton hadron and photon hadron colliders, hep-ph/9911417

    S. Sultansoy, The PostHERA era: Brief review of future lepton hadron and photon hadron colliders, hep-ph/9911417

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Y. C. Acar, A. N. Akay, S. Beser, A. C. Canbay, H. Karadeniz, U. Kaya et al., Future circular collider based lepton–hadron and photon–hadron colliders: Luminosity and physics , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 871 (2017) 47–53, [ 1608.02190]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A. C. Canbay, U. Kaya, B. Ketenoglu, B. B. Oner and S. Sultansoy, SppC based energy frontier lepton-proton colliders: luminosity and physics , Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017 (2017) 4021493, [ 1704.03534]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ketenoglu, Main parameters of SppC-based ”linac-ring eA” and ”ring-ring muA” colliders, 1811.05129

    B. Ketenoglu, Main parameters of SppC-based ”linac-ring eA” and ”ring-ring muA” colliders, 1811.05129

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    U. Kaya, B. Ketenoglu, S. Sultansoy and F. Zimmermann, Luminosity and Physics Considerations on HL-LHC and HE-LHC based mu-p Colliders , 1905.05564

    1905 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cheung and Z

    K. Cheung and Z. S. Wang, Physics potential of a muon-proton collider , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 116009, [ 2101.10476]. – 15 –

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dagli, B

    B. Dagli, B. Ketenoglu and S. Sultansoy, Review of Muon-Proton Collider Proposals: Main Parameters, 2206.00037

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Acosta and W

    D. Acosta and W. Li, A muon–ion collider at BNL: The future QCD frontier and path to a new energy frontier of µ+µ− colliders, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1027 (2022) 166334, [2107.02073]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Acosta, E

    D. Acosta, E. Barberis, N. Hurley, W. Li, O. Miguel Colin, Y. Wang et al., The potential of a TeV-scale muon-ion collider , JINST 18 (2023) P09025, [ 2203.06258]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hatta, Accessing the gravitational form factors of the nucleon and nuclei through a massive graviton, Phys

    Y. Hatta, Accessing the gravitational form factors of the nucleon and nuclei through a massive graviton, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) L051502, [ 2311.14470]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Agostini et al., The Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC , J

    LHeC, FCC-he Study Groupcollaboration, P. Agostini et al., The Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC , J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 110501, [ 2007.14491]

    2021

  13. [21]

    J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansouli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin et al., Muon Colliders, 1901.06150

    1901 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Terzani et al., Measurement of directional muon beams generated at the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator, 2411.02321

    D. Terzani et al., Measurement of directional muon beams generated at the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator, 2411.02321

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Aritome et al., Acceleration of positive muons by a radio-frequency cavity , 2410.11367

    S. Aritome et al., Acceleration of positive muons by a radio-frequency cavity , 2410.11367

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gonderinger and M

    M. Gonderinger and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electron-to-Tau Lepton Flavor Violation at the Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP 11 (2010) 045, [ 1006.5063]. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 047 (2012)]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Liu and B

    Y. Liu and B. Yan, Searching for the axion-like particle at the EIC* , Chin. Phys. C 47 (2023) 043113, [ 2112.02477]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Cirigliano, K

    V. Cirigliano, K. Fuyuto, C. Lee, E. Mereghetti and B. Yan, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation at the EIC , JHEP 03 (2021) 256, [ 2102.06176]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli and E. T. Neil, Lepton-flavor-violating ALPs at the Electron-Ion Collider: a golden opportunity , JHEP 02 (2023) 071, [ 2112.04513]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    B. Yan, Z. Yu and C. P. Yuan, The anomalous Zbb¯ couplings at the HERA and EIC , Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136697, [ 2107.02134]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    H. T. Li, B. Yan and C. P. Yuan, Jet charge: A new tool to probe the anomalous Zbb ¯ couplings at the EIC , Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137300, [ 2112.07747]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Batell, T

    B. Batell, T. Ghosh, T. Han and K. Xie, Heavy neutral leptons at the Electron-Ion Collider , JHEP 03 (2023) 020, [ 2210.09287]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. L. Zhang et al., Search for e→τ charged lepton flavor violation at the EIC with the ECCE detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1053 (2023) 168276, [ 2207.10261]

    2023

  24. [32]

    Yan, Probing the dark photon via polarized DIS scattering at the HERA and EIC , Phys

    B. Yan, Probing the dark photon via polarized DIS scattering at the HERA and EIC , Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137384, [ 2203.01510]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Boughezal, A

    R. Boughezal, A. Emmert, T. Kutz, S. Mantry, M. Nycz, F. Petriello et al., Neutral-current electroweak physics and SMEFT studies at the EIC , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 016006, [2204.07557]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli and E. T. Neil, Displaced signals of hidden vectors at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 075017, [ 2307.00102]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Balkin, O

    R. Balkin, O. Hen, W. Li, H. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Soreq et al., Probing axion-like particles at the Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP 02 (2024) 123, [ 2310.08827]. – 16 –

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli and E. T. Neil, Flavor-violating ALPs, electron g-2, and the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 115013, [ 2402.17821]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Wang, X.-K

    H.-L. Wang, X.-K. Wen, H. Xing and B. Yan, Probing the four-fermion operators via the transverse double spin asymmetry at the Electron-Ion Collider , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 095025, [2401.08419]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    X.-K. Wen, B. Yan, Z. Yu and C. P. Yuan, Dihadron azimuthal asymmetry and light-quark dipole moments at the Electron-Ion Collider , 2408.07255

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. K. Adkins et al., Design of the ECCE Detector for the Electron Ion Collider , 2209.02580

  32. [40]

    Far-Forward and Far-Backward Detectors at the Electron-Ion Collider

    EPIC collaboration, “ Far-Forward and Far-Backward Detectors at the Electron-Ion Collider .” https://indico.jlab.org/event/344/contributions/10559/

  33. [41]

    Cesarotti, S

    C. Cesarotti, S. Homiller, R. K. Mishra and M. Reece, Probing New Gauge Forces with a High-Energy Muon Beam Dump , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 071803, [ 2202.12302]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cesarotti and R

    C. Cesarotti and R. Gambhir, The new physics case for beam-dump experiments with accelerated muon beams, JHEP 05 (2024) 283, [ 2310.16110]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Sieber, D

    H. Sieber, D. V. Kirpichnikov, I. V. Voronchikhin, P. Crivelli, S. N. Gninenko, M. M. Kirsanov et al., Probing hidden sectors with a muon beam: Implication of spin-0 dark matter mediators for the muon (g-2) anomaly and the validity of the Weisz¨ acker-Williams approach, Phys. ...

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Batell, H

    B. Batell, H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, E. T. Neil and S. Trojanowski, Lepton-flavor-violating ALP signals with TeV-scale muon beams , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 075039, [2407.15942]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Fayet and M

    P. Fayet and M. O. Olea-Romacho, Searching for a new light gauge boson with axial couplings in muon beam dump experiments , JHEP 07 (2024) 223, [ 2405.02104]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Hamada, R

    Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, H. Takaura and M. Yoshida, µTRISTAN, PTEP 2022 (2022) 053B02, [ 2201.06664]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Aad et al., Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 051801, [ 2002.12223]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 07 (2021) 208, [2103.02708]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for heavy resonances and quantum black holes in e µ, e τ , and µτ final states in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 05 (2023) 227, [ 2205.06709]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch, HighPT: A tool for high- pT Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model , Comput. Phys. Commun. 289 (2023) 108749, [ 2207.10756]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Dorˇ sner, S

    I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Koˇ snik,Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders , Phys. Rept. 641 (2016) 1–68, [ 1603.04993]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton Number as the Fourth Color , Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 275–289. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703–703 (1975)]. – 17 –

    1974

  45. [53]

    Bordone, C

    M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies , Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 317–323, [ 1712.01368]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Greljo and B

    A. Greljo and B. A. Stefanek, Third family quark–lepton unification at the TeV scale , Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 131–138, [ 1802.04274]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Blanke and A

    M. Blanke and A. Crivellin, B Meson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 011801, [ 1801.07256]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Guadagnoli, M

    D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud and P. Stangl, The Dark Side of 4321 , JHEP 10 (2020) 084, [2005.10117]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. J. Baker, D. A. Faroughy and S. Trifinopoulos, Collider signatures of coannihilating dark matter in light of the B-physics anomalies , JHEP 11 (2021) 084, [ 2109.08689]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Marzocca, U

    D. Marzocca, U. Min and M. Son, Bottom-Flavored Mono-Tau Tails at the LHC , JHEP 12 (2020) 035, [ 2008.07541]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Asadi, R

    P. Asadi, R. Capdevilla, C. Cesarotti and S. Homiller, Searching for leptoquarks at future muon colliders , JHEP 10 (2021) 182, [ 2104.05720]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Azatov, F

    A. Azatov, F. Garosi, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Salko and S. Trifinopoulos, New physics in b → sµµ: FCC-hh or a muon collider? , JHEP 10 (2022) 149, [ 2205.13552]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    T. Han, Y. Ma and K. Xie, High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L031301, [ 2007.14300]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    T. Han, Y. Ma and K. Xie, Quark and gluon contents of a lepton at high energies , JHEP 02 (2022) 154, [ 2103.09844]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Garosi, D

    F. Garosi, D. Marzocca and S. Trifinopoulos, LePDF: Standard Model PDFs for high-energy lepton colliders , JHEP 09 (2023) 107, [ 2303.16964]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, R. Nathvani and R. S. Thorne, Ad Lucem: QED Parton Distribution Functions in the MMHT Framework , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 811, [1907.02750]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Aad et al., Search for new phenomena in pp collisions in final states with tau leptons, b-jets, and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for new phenomena in pp collisions in final states with tau leptons, b-jets, and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 112005, [ 2108.07665]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Aad et al., Search for leptoquarks decaying into the b τ final state in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10 (2023) 001, [2305.15962]

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for leptoquarks decaying into the b τ final state in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10 (2023) 001, [2305.15962]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Batell, N

    B. Batell, N. Lange, D. McKeen, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Muon anomalous magnetic moment through the leptonic Higgs portal , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 075003, [ 1606.04943]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    BaBar collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 011102, [ 1606.03501]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Geiregat et al., First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys

    CHARM-II collaboration, D. Geiregat et al., First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 271–275

    1990

  62. [70]

    CCFR collaboration, S. R. Mishra et al., Neutrino Tridents and W Z Interference , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 3117–3120

    1991

  63. [71]

    Altmannshofer, S

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091801, [1406.2332]. – 18 –

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Galon, E

    I. Galon, E. Kajamovitz, D. Shih, Y. Soreq and S. Tarem, Searching for muonic forces with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 011701, [ 1906.09272]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ariga, R

    A. Ariga, R. Balkin, I. Galon, E. Kajomovitz and Y. Soreq, Hunting muonic forces at emulsion detectors, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 035003, [ 2305.03102]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    C.-Y. Chen, J. Kozaczuk and Y.-M. Zhong, Exploring leptophilic dark matter with NA64- µ, JHEP 10 (2018) 154, [ 1807.03790]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran and A. Whitbeck, M3: a new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g − 2)µ and dark matter at Fermilab , JHEP 09 (2018) 153, [1804.03144]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22–24

    1991

  69. [77]

    Foot, New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization? , Mod

    R. Foot, New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization? , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 527–530

    1991

  70. [78]

    X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model , Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118–2132

    1991

  71. [79]

    J. F. Kamenik, Y. Soreq and J. Zupan, Lepton flavor universality violation without new sources of quark flavor violation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035002, [ 1704.06005]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Delaunay, T

    C. Delaunay, T. Ma and Y. Soreq, Stealth decaying spin-1 dark matter , JHEP 02 (2021) 010, [2009.03060]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Krnjaic, G

    G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo and K. Tobioka, Probing Muonphilic Force Carriers and Dark Matter at Kaon Factories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 041802, [1902.07715]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Balkin, C

    R. Balkin, C. Delaunay, M. Geller, E. Kajomovitz, G. Perez, Y. Shpilman et al., Custodial symmetry for muon g-2 , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 053009, [ 2104.08289]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Bandyopadhyay, S

    T. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chakraborty and S. Trifinopoulos, Displaced searches for light vector bosons at Belle II , JHEP 05 (2022) 141, [ 2203.03280]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu et al., Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump , Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3375

    1988

  77. [85]

    Abbiendi et al., Multiphoton production in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 181-GeV to 209-GeV , Eur

    OPAL collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Multiphoton production in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 181-GeV to 209-GeV , Eur. Phys. J. C 26 (2003) 331–344, [ hep-ex/0210016]

    2003 arXiv

  78. [86]

    D¨ obrich, J

    B. D¨ obrich, J. Jaeckel, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Ringwald and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, ALPtraum: ALP production in proton beam dump experiments , JHEP 02 (2016) 018, [ 1512.03069]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Jaeckel and M

    J. Jaeckel and M. Spannowsky, Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 482–487, [ 1509.00476]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou and T. Melia, Searching for Axionlike Particles with Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 171801, [ 1607.06083]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 044, [ 1708.00443]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Aloni, C

    D. Aloni, C. Fanelli, Y. Soreq and M. Williams, Photoproduction of Axionlike Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 071801, [ 1903.03586]. – 19 –

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Larin et al., A New Measurement of the π0 Radiative Decay Width, Phys

    PrimEx collaboration, I. Larin et al., A New Measurement of the π0 Radiative Decay Width, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 162303, [ 1009.1681]

    2011 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Abudin´ en et al.,Search for Axion-Like Particles produced in e+e− collisions at Belle II , Phys

    Belle-II collaboration, F. Abudin´ en et al.,Search for Axion-Like Particles produced in e+e− collisions at Belle II , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 161806, [ 2007.13071]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Ablikim et al., Search for an axion-like particle in radiative J/ ψ decays, Phys

    BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., Search for an axion-like particle in radiative J/ ψ decays, Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137698, [ 2211.12699]

    2023

  86. [94]

    J. R. Pybus et al., Search for axion-like particles through nuclear Primakoff production using the GlueX detector , Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138790, [ 2308.06339]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Axionlike particles at F ASER: The LHC as a photon beam dump , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055021, [ 1806.02348]

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    D¨ obrich, J

    B. D¨ obrich, J. Jaeckel and T. Spadaro,Light in the beam dump - ALP production from decay photons in proton beam-dumps , JHEP 05 (2019) 213, [ 1904.02091]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 046 (2020)]

    2019 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Bai et al., New physics searches with an optical dump at LUXE , Phys

    Z. Bai et al., New physics searches with an optical dump at LUXE , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115034, [ 2107.13554]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [98]

    M. J. Dolan, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Revised constraints and Belle II sensitivity for visible and invisible axion-like particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 094, [ 1709.00009]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 190 (2021)]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Rebello Teles, D

    P. Rebello Teles, D. d’Enterria, V. P. Gon¸ calves and D. E. Martins, Searches for axionlike particles via γγ fusion at future e+e- colliders , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 055003, [2310.17270]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Yue, M.-Z

    C.-X. Yue, M.-Z. Liu and Y.-C. Guo, Searching for axionlike particles at future ep colliders, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015020, [ 1904.10657]

    2019 arXiv

  93. [101]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  94. [102]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  95. [103]

    Berezhiani, L

    Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti, Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 286–296, [ hep-ph/0009290]

    2001 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Hook, Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem , Phys

    A. Hook, Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 141801, [1411.3325]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Fukuda, K

    H. Fukuda, K. Harigaya, M. Ibe and T. T. Yanagida, Model of visible QCD axion , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 015021, [ 1504.06084]

    2015 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Gherghetta, N

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata and M. Shifman, A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 115010, [ 1604.01127]

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Dimopoulos, A

    S. Dimopoulos, A. Hook, J. Huang and G. Marques-Tavares, A collider observable QCD axion, JHEP 11 (2016) 052, [ 1606.03097]

    2016 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe, Factoring the Strong CP Problem , JHEP 12 (2018) 029, [1710.04213]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    M. K. Gaillard, M. B. Gavela, R. Houtz, P. Quilez and R. Del Rey, Color unified dynamical axion, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 972, [ 1805.06465]. – 20 –

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    A. Hook, S. Kumar, Z. Liu and R. Sundrum, High Quality QCD Axion and the LHC , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 221801, [ 1911.12364]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Gherghetta and M

    T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen, A Composite Higgs with a Heavy Composite Axion , JHEP 12 (2020) 094, [ 2007.10875]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer and Y. Shirman, UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups , JHEP 04 (2020) 031, [ 1912.02197]

    2020 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Gavela, P

    B. Gavela, P. Qu ´ ılez and M. Ramos,The QCD axion sum rule , JHEP 04 (2024) 056, [2305.15465]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Challenges for heavy QCD axion inflation , JCAP 10 (2021) 057, [2105.10493]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Nomura and J

    Y. Nomura and J. Thaler, Dark Matter through the Axion Portal , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 075008, [0810.5397]

    2009 arXiv

  108. [116]

    M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, A taste of dark matter: Flavour constraints on pseudoscalar mediators , JHEP 03 (2015) 171, [ 1412.5174]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 103 (2015)]

    2015 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Mcgehee, H. Murayama and K. Schutz, Strongly interacting massive particles through the axion portal , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115031, [ 1806.10139]

    2018 arXiv

  110. [118]

    P. J. Fitzpatrick, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Ovadia and Y. Soreq, Dark matter through the axion-gluon portal, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 075003, [ 2306.03128]

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report , Nucl

    R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report , Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447, [ 2103.05419]

    2022 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Z. Bern, A. De Freitas, L. J. Dixon, A. Ghinculov and H. L. Wong, QCD and QED corrections to light by light scattering , JHEP 11 (2001) 031, [ hep-ph/0109079]

    2001 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS , 1504.04956

    SHiP collaboration, M. Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS , 1504.04956

    arXiv

  114. [122]

    Albanese, J

    SHiP collaboration, R. Albanese, J. Alt, A. Alexandrov, S. Aoki, D. Aritunov, A. Bay et al., BDF/SHiP at the ECN3 high-intensity beam facility , tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2023

    2023

  115. [123]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, On search for a new light gauge boson from pi0 (eta) —> gamma + X decays in neutrino experiments , Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 307–313, [hep-ph/9802375]

    1998 arXiv

  116. [124]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, Limits on the magnetic moment of sterile neutrino and two photon neutrino decay , Phys. Lett. B 450 (1999) 165–172, [ hep-ph/9808370]

    1999 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Aaboud et al., Search for dark matter at √s = 13 TeV in final states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    ATLAS collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for dark matter at √s = 13 TeV in final states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 393, [ 1704.03848]

    2017 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Magill, R

    G. Magill, R. Plestid, M. Pospelov and Y.-D. Tsai, Dipole Portal to Heavy Neutral Leptons , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115015, [ 1803.03262]

    2018 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Ismail, S

    A. Ismail, S. Jana and R. M. Abraham, Neutrino up-scattering via the dipole portal at forward LHC detectors , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 055008, [ 2109.05032]

    2022 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Song, R. Ding and L. Chen, Neutrino dipole portal at electron colliders , Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137116, [ 2204.07802]. – 21 –

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Ovchynnikov and J.-Y

    M. Ovchynnikov and J.-Y. Zhu, Search for the dipole portal of heavy neutral leptons at future colliders, JHEP 07 (2023) 039, [ 2301.08592]

    2023 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Beltr´ an, P

    R. Beltr´ an, P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, C. Hati and M. Hirsch, Probing heavy neutrino magnetic moments at the LHC using long-lived particle searches , JHEP 07 (2024) 153, [2405.08877]

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Barducci and A

    D. Barducci and A. Dondarini, Neutrino dipole portal at a high energy µ−collider, JHEP 10 (2024) 165, [ 2404.09609]

    2024 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Coloma, P

    P. Coloma, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler and I. M. Shoemaker, Double-Cascade Events from New Physics in Icecube , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 201804, [ 1707.08573]

    2017 arXiv

  125. [133]

    I. M. Shoemaker and J. Wyenberg, Direct Detection Experiments at the Neutrino Dipole Portal Frontier, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075010, [ 1811.12435]

    2019 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Brdar, A

    V. Brdar, A. Greljo, J. Kopp and T. Opferkuch, The Neutrino Magnetic Moment Portal: Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Direct Detection , JCAP 01 (2021) 039, [ 2007.15563]

    2021 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Schwetz, A

    T. Schwetz, A. Zhou and J.-Y. Zhu, Constraining active-sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments at DUNE near and far detectors , JHEP 21 (2020) 200, [ 2105.09699]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Atkinson, P

    M. Atkinson, P. Coloma, I. Martinez-Soler, N. Rocco and I. M. Shoemaker, Heavy Neutrino Searches through Double-Bang Events at Super-Kamiokande, DUNE, and Hyper-Kamiokande, JHEP 04 (2022) 174, [ 2105.09357]

    2022 arXiv

  129. [137]

    P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, K. Fridell, J. Harz, C. Hati and S. Kulkarni, Probing active-sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments with photon emission from CE νNS, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 035036, [ 2110.02233]

    2022 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Barducci, W

    D. Barducci, W. Liu, A. Titov, Z. S. Wang and Y. Zhang, Probing the dipole portal to heavy neutral leptons via meson decays at the high-luminosity LHC , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 115009, [2308.16608]

    2023 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Li, Y.-F

    Y.-Y. Li, Y.-F. Li and S.-Y. Xia, Neutrino magnetic dipole portal with low energy neutrino nucleus scattering data , 2406.07477

    arXiv

  132. [140]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128, [ 1106.0522]

    2011 arXiv

  133. [141]

    N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy , Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614–1641, [ 0806.4194]

    2009 arXiv

  134. [142]

    R. A. mann, M. Lamont and S. Myers, A brief history of the lep collider , Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 109 (2002) 17–31. Proceedings of the 7th Topical Seminar

    2002

  135. [143]

    Senol, Anomalous Higgs Couplings at the LHeC , Nucl

    A. Senol, Anomalous Higgs Couplings at the LHeC , Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 293–299, [1212.6869]

    2013 arXiv

  136. [144]

    S. S. Biswal, M. Patra and S. Raychaudhuri, Anomalous Triple Gauge Vertices at the Large Hadron-Electron Collider, 1405.6056

    arXiv

  137. [145]

    I. T. Cakir, O. Cakir, A. Senol and A. T. Tasci, Search for anomalous W W γand W W Z couplings with polarized e-beam at the LHeC , Acta Phys. Polon. B 45 (2014) 1947, [1406.7696]

    2014 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Kumar, X

    M. Kumar, X. Ruan, R. Islam, A. S. Cornell, M. Klein, U. Klein et al., Probing anomalous couplings using di-Higgs production in electron–proton collisions , Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 247–253, [1509.04016]. – 22 –

    2017 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Sun and X

    H. Sun and X. Wang, Exploring the Anomalous Top-Higgs FCNC Couplings at the electron proton colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 281, [ 1602.04670]

    2018 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Coleppa, M

    B. Coleppa, M. Kumar, S. Kumar and B. Mellado, Measuring CP nature of top-Higgs couplings at the future Large Hadron electron collider , Phys. Lett. B 770 (2017) 335–341, [1702.03426]

    2017 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Bernaciak, T

    C. Bernaciak, T. Plehn, P. Schichtel and J. Tattersall, Spying an invisible Higgs boson , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035024, [ 1411.7699]

    2015 arXiv

  142. [150]

    S. P. Das, J. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, S. Moretti, A. Rosado and R. Xoxocotzi,Flavor violating signatures of lighter and heavier Higgs bosons within the Two Higgs Doublet Model Type-III at the LHeC , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055003, [ 1503.01464]

    2016 arXiv

  143. [151]

    S. P. Das and M. Nowakowski, Light neutral CP-even Higgs boson within Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard model (NMSSM) at the Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055014, [ 1612.07241]

    2017 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Curtin, K

    D. Curtin, K. Deshpande, O. Fischer and J. Zurita, New Physics Opportunities for Long-Lived Particles at Electron-Proton Colliders , JHEP 07 (2018) 024, [ 1712.07135]

    2018 arXiv

  145. [153]

    H. Sun, X. Luo, W. Wei and T. Liu, Searching for the doubly-charged Higgs bosons in the Georgi-Machacek model at the electron-proton colliders , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095003, [1710.06284]

    2017 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Azuelos, H

    G. Azuelos, H. Sun and K. Wang, Search for singly charged Higgs bosons in vector-boson scattering at ep colliders , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 116005, [ 1712.07505]

    2018 arXiv

  147. [155]

    S. P. Das, J. Hernandez-Sanchez, S. Moretti and A. Rosado, Prospects for discovering a light charged Higgs boson within the NMSSM at the FCC-eh collider , 1806.08361

    arXiv

  148. [156]

    Delle Rose, O

    L. Delle Rose, O. Fischer and A. Hammad, Prospects for Heavy Scalar Searches at the LHeC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 (2019) 1950127, [ 1809.04321]

    2019 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Kuday, Resonant Production of Sbottom via RPV Couplings at the LHeC , J

    S. Kuday, Resonant Production of Sbottom via RPV Couplings at the LHeC , J. Korean Phys. Soc. 64 (2014) 1783–1787, [ 1304.2124]

    2014 arXiv

  150. [158]

    X.-P. Li, L. Guo, W.-G. Ma, R.-Y. Zhang, L. Han and M. Song, Single (anti-)top quark production in association with a lightest neutralino at the LHeC , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 014023, [1307.2308]

    2013 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Zhang, H

    R.-Y. Zhang, H. Wei, L. Han and W.-G. Ma, Probing L-violating coupling via sbottom resonance production at the LHeC , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29 (2014) 1450029, [ 1401.4266]

    2014 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Azuelos, M

    G. Azuelos, M. D’Onofrio, S. Iwamoto and K. Wang, Search for the SUSY electroweak sector at ep colliders, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095015, [ 1912.03823]

    2020 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Antusch, E

    S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer, Sterile neutrino searches at future e−e+, pp, and e−p colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1750078, [ 1612.02728]

    2017 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Lindner, F

    M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann and C. E. Yaguna, Left-Right Symmetry and Lepton Number Violation at the Large Hadron Electron Collider , JHEP 06 (2016) 140, [1604.08596]

    2016 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Antusch, O

    S. Antusch, O. Fischer and A. Hammad, Lepton-Trijet and Displaced Vertex Searches for Heavy Neutrinos at Future Electron-Proton Colliders , JHEP 03 (2020) 110, [ 1908.02852]

    2020 arXiv

  156. [164]

    A. Das, S. Jana, S. Mandal and S. Nandi, Probing right handed neutrinos at the LHeC and lepton colliders using fat jet signatures , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055030, [ 1811.04291]. – 23 –

    2019 arXiv

  157. [165]

    S. Jana, N. Okada and D. Raut, Displaced vertex and disappearing track signatures in type-III seesaw, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 927, [ 1911.09037]

    2022 arXiv

  158. [166]

    A. Das, S. Mandal and T. Modak, Testing triplet fermions at the electron-positron and electron-proton colliders using fat jet signatures , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 033001, [2005.02267]

    2020 arXiv

  159. [167]

    D’Onofrio, O

    M. D’Onofrio, O. Fischer and Z. S. Wang, Searching for Dark Photons at the LHeC and FCC-he, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 015020, [ 1909.02312]. – 24 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.