Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 62 references

QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification Network for Fisheye Images

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QueryCDR claims that a single network, guided by user-selectable learnable queries, rectifies fisheye images at every tested distortion degree without retraining.

desk verdict A genuinely new control mechanism for fisheye rectification, but the generalization claim is only tested on the nine fine-tuned distortion levels, not on unseen ones. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13496 v2 pith:JGJZDDUC submitted 2024-12-18 cs.CV

Pengbo Guo , Chengxu Liu , Xingsong Hou , Xueming Qian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords fisheyeimagerectificationcontrollablelearnablequeriesdistortion-awarecontrolappearanceflowCNN-Transformerhybridgeneralizationwithoutretrainingrestoration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that one fisheye-rectification network can handle the full range of distortion strengths without being retrained for each lens. The design replaces a single scalar degradation level with learnable spatial queries: the user selects or interpolates a query, and the network modulates its own features at every layer according to that query. On a nine-level synthetic benchmark built from COCO, QueryCDR reports the best image-quality metrics PSNR and SSIM at every level, averaging 20.32 dB against 18.53 dB for the previous best method. If this holds, fisheye cameras with different fields of view would no longer force retraining or a separate model per distortion degree.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM): a set of learnable queries, each the same spatial size as the input image, encoding position-dependent distortion patterns instead of a single number. DLQM extracts a query into per-layer control conditions through convolutions and fully connected layers, and two modulating blocks apply them: the Controllable Convolution Modulating Block (CCMB) predicts a dynamic fusion ratio between original and controlled features, while the Controllable Attention Modulating Block (CAMB) uses the controlled feature as the attention query to capture long-range distortion mappings. Together they let one network adjust its rectification strength purely from the query input.

What would settle it

On real fisheye images from lenses with different fields of view, pick the nearest trained query, rectify, and measure the residual curvature of straight scene lines or compare against calibration-based undistortion. If the rectified outputs keep visible line curvature at distortion levels away from the nine anchors, or if the quality gap to a per-degree retrained model grows with distance from the anchors, the central no-retraining claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that distortion rectification can be controlled by position-dependent latent queries rather than a scalar degradation index. During training, the nine learnable queries in the Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM) each absorb the latent spatial mapping of one distortion degree; at inference, the chosen query is converted layer by layer into control conditions that steer both local convolution modulation and global attention modulation. The paper's evidence is that this design outperforms every compared method at every distortion level on the COCO fisheye benchmark, and that interpolating between queries produces smooth intermediate rectifications.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the four-parameter polynomial model used to synthesize training images faithfully represents the distortion of real fisheye cameras, so the query-conditioned mappings learned on synthetic data remain valid in practice; the paper validates this only qualitatively on WoodScape.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single trained model can replace per-distortion retraining: switching from mild to severe distortion only requires selecting a different query.
  • Query interpolation gives continuous control, so users can produce rectifications at distortion strengths between the trained anchors.
  • The hybrid CNN/Transformer architecture trades off quality and cost, with the 6C+5A configuration giving the best measured balance of PSNR, SSIM, FLOPs, and parameter count.
  • Ablations show that spatial query conditions outperform scalar or fixed-position controls, indicating that position-dependent control is what enables the generalization.
  • Qualitative results on WoodScape indicate that the synthetic-trained queries carry over to real fisheye images, although the paper reports no quantitative real-world metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the query set forms a continuous manifold, a natural next step is to regress the query from the image itself, making rectification fully automatic rather than user-selected.
  • The same query-conditioned modulation could apply to other spatially structured degradations, such as radial vignetting, non-uniform motion blur, or panoramic projections, where scalar controls are too coarse.
  • Measuring line straightness on WoodScape rectifications would quantitatively test whether the synthetic four-parameter distortion family actually covers real lenses; the paper only offers qualitative evidence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes QueryCDR, a fisheye image rectification network that uses a set of learnable queries as controllability conditions. A Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM) maps a user-supplied query to layer-wise control conditions, and two modulating blocks (CCMB and CAMB) inject these conditions into a U-shaped rectification network. The model is pre-trained on a single distortion degree and fine-tuned on nine degrees d1–d9, then evaluated on a test set built with the same nine degrees. The authors report large quantitative gains over prior methods on the COCO fisheye benchmark and show qualitative results on the real-world WoodScape dataset. The central claim is that the model can rectify images with varying distortion degrees without retraining, and that interpolating between queries yields continuous control for any degree.

Significance. If the generalization claim were fully supported, this would be a useful step toward practical fisheye rectification, since one model could serve multiple distortion levels and users could control the output by selecting or interpolating queries. The paper is clearly structured, the code is released, and the ablations in Tables 2–4 are systematic and internally consistent. However, the headline claim is currently supported only for the nine distortion levels used in fine-tuning, not for unseen degrees. The real-world validation is exclusively qualitative, and the query-selection protocol for real images is unspecified. As presented, the contribution is a controllable conditional rectification network for nine trained degrees, not a demonstrated generalization to a continuum of distortion degrees. The proposed mechanism is plausible and the reported numbers are strong, but the missing held-out-degree evaluation is load-bearing for the paper's main claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Sec. 4.2, Tab. 1] The test set uses exactly the nine distortion degrees d1–d9 that were used for fine-tuning (Eq. (13)), and the user supplies a query Qi corresponding to the test degree. Therefore Tab. 1 does not measure generalization to unseen distortion degrees; it measures performance on nine trained conditions. The claims in Sec. 4.2 ('achieves the best performance across all distortion degrees without retraining') and Sec. 3.2 ('smooth continuous rectification for any distortion degree') go beyond what these experiments show. Please add a quantitative evaluation on held-out degrees, e.g., test on d1.5, d2.5, ..., d8.5 using interpolated queries (and possibly extrapolated queries for d0/d10), with PSNR/SSIM and a comparison to the same baselines at those degrees. Without such an experiment, the central generalization claim is unsupported.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Sec. 3.4] The control mechanism requires the user to supply a query that corresponds to the distortion degree of the input image. During fine-tuning Eq. (13) explicitly pairs Qi with di, and at test time Tab. 1 uses the same Qi for each di. The paper does not state how a user obtains the correct Qi for a real-world image that was not generated with a known parameter. This makes the 'without retraining' claim operationally dependent on prior knowledge of the distortion degree. Please specify the query-selection protocol for real images, or add an automatic query-prediction module, and report how the queries were chosen for the WoodScape examples in Fig. 5.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Fig. 5] Real-world validation is only qualitative. No quantitative metric is reported on the WoodScape dataset, and there is no comparison against baselines. Since the model is trained entirely on synthetic data from a four-parameter polynomial model, the synthetic-to-real generalization claim requires stronger evidence. At minimum, report a measurable rectification quality score (e.g., line straightness, LPIPS against a corrected reference, or residual distortion parameters) and state the query used for each real image.
  4. [Sec. 4.1, Tab. 1, Tab. 2] The comparison with baselines may conflate the benefit of the query mechanism with the benefit of per-degree specialization. The baselines are retrained on all nine degrees jointly but do not receive a per-degree condition, whereas QueryCDR is fine-tuned with a distinct query per degree and can thereby specialize its behavior per degree. The 'W/o Control' row in Tab. 2 replicates the PCN numbers and does not establish what the proposed U-shaped backbone achieves without control. Please add an ablation that trains the QueryCDR backbone on the nine degrees with a single query (or with a scalar degree embedding of comparable capacity) to isolate the contribution of DLQM.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (2)] The notation Ql_c is used for both the control condition at layer l and the input to layer l+1; please clarify the dimensions of the FC outputs and state explicitly that when Eq. (3) is used inside layer l, Qc refers to Ql_c.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The interpolation examples Q1.25 = 0.75Q1 + 0.25Q2 and Q8.5 = 0.5Q8 + 0.5Q9 are shown in the figure caption, but the paper does not report any quantitative evaluation of interpolated queries on the COCO test set. Please either add such an evaluation or soften the 'any distortion degree' wording.
  3. [Sec. 4.1] The experimental settings describe 40,000 pre-training images and 18,000 fine-tuning images, but do not specify how many of these come from COCO versus Places2, and Tab. 1 reports only COCO. Please clarify the dataset split and report Places2 results if they are available.
  4. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (6)] In the definition of control-attention, the projection matrices WQ, WK, WV are said to map to R^{m×C}; please specify the relationship between m and the channel dimension C, and whether m equals C in the experiments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the learnable queries are conditional inputs trained on disjoint training images, and the reported test metrics are forward predictions; the same-degree train/test design limits the generalization claim but does not make it circular.

full rationale

QueryCDR's derivation chain is self-contained. DLQM defines a set of learnable queries Qs, Eq. (13) trains each Qi on images of degree di, and at inference the user supplies a query to modulate features through CCMB and CAMB. The Table 1 evaluations use test images disjoint from the 18,000 fine-tuning images, so the reported PSNR/SSIM values are genuine predictions conditional on a user-selected query rather than reconstructions of training labels. The concern that the test set uses the same nine distortion degrees d1-d9 as fine-tuning is a real scope limitation on the claim of generalization to unseen distortion degrees; only qualitative interpolation examples (Q1.25, Q8.5) are shown with no quantitative results at interpolated or extrapolated queries, and the real-world WoodScape validation is qualitative only. However, this missing evidence is not circularity: no test query, test label, or test output is fitted by the reported procedure, and the paper does not claim the model infers the distortion degree from the image. There is also no load-bearing self-citation (references [28]-[31] are background low-level-vision citations, not premises), no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in by citation; the controllable blocks are new architectural components evaluated by ablation. The synthetic-data assumption about the four-parameter polynomial model is a validity assumption, not a circular derivation. Overall, the central claim is independently testable, and the flaws are experimental scope and missing quantitative generalization evidence rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the synthetic distortion model, the one-dimensional ordering of distortion degrees, and the reliability of the pretrained flow module. The method introduces no derived physical constants; the query set is a learned parameterization of the control space.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of distortion levels N = 9
    The query set size is chosen by the authors and defines the granularity of control; it is used for both fine-tuning and testing.
  • Distortion degree values d1..d9 = Not specified in the paper
    The mapping from each degree to the four-parameter polynomial coefficients is inherited from prior datasets but never stated, which blocks exact reproduction of the synthetic data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The four-parameter polynomial model accurately represents fisheye distortion in real images.
    Invoked in Sec. 4.1 for synthetic data generation; real-world results are only qualitative (Sec. 4.2).
  • domain assumption The distortion space is a one-dimensional continuum that can be discretized into ordered levels d1..d9 and represented by distinct learnable queries.
    Assumed throughout Sec. 3.2 and 3.4; query interpolation (Fig. 3) assumes smoothness that is only shown visually.
  • domain assumption The appearance flow estimation module from PCN provides a valid coarse rectification for all distortion degrees.
    Used in Sec. 3.1 as the first stage; if the flow fails at high distortion, the whole pipeline suffers.
  • standard math Attention softmax, layer normalization, and feed-forward networks behave as assumed.
    These are standard components used in CAMB (Sec. 3.3) without proof, as is normal for deep learning papers.
invented entities (1)
  • Learnable query set Qs = {Q1..Q9}
    purpose: Provides per-distortion-degree control conditions injected into the rectification network
    The queries are learned embeddings with no external referent; they cannot be validated outside this paper's training data and do not correspond to any measurable physical quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification Network for Fisheye Images." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JGJZDDUC

@misc{pith2026241213496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification Network for Fisheye Images},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JGJZDDUC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13496}
}
read the original abstract

Fisheye image rectification aims to correct distortions in images taken with fisheye cameras. Although current models show promising results on images with a similar degree of distortion as the training data, they will produce sub-optimal results when the degree of distortion changes and without retraining. The lack of generalization ability for dealing with varying degrees of distortion limits their practical application. In this paper, we take one step further to enable effective distortion rectification for images with varying degrees of distortion without retraining. We propose a novel Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification network for fisheye images (QueryCDR). In particular, we first present the Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM), which defines the latent spatial relationships for different distortion degrees as a series of learnable queries. Each query can be learned to obtain position-dependent rectification control conditions, providing control over the rectification process. Then, we propose two kinds of controllable modulating blocks to enable the control conditions to guide the modulation of the distortion features better. These core components cooperate with each other to effectively boost the generalization ability of the model at varying degrees of distortion. Extensive experiments on fisheye image datasets with different distortion degrees demonstrate our approach achieves high-quality and controllable distortion rectification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13496 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Different approaches to fisheye image distortion rectification. (a) Regression￾Based: Using a neural network to predict distortion-related parameters, then apply rectification algorithms R for rectification. (b) Generation-Based: Input the distorted fisheye image and directly generate the rectified image end-to-end. (c) Control-Based: Users provide control conditions to guide the rectification process, resulting in … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of our proposed Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification network (QueryCDR). The Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM) extracts control conditions from user-given queries and feeds them layer by layer into the rectification network. The rectification network is composed of Controllable Con￾volution Modulating Blocks (CCMB) and Controllable Attention Modulating Blocks (CAMB), which modul… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Given an input image, QueryCDR can accurately produce results with different rectification degrees by feeding different queries. Moreover, by interpolating between different queries, we can achieve smooth continuous rectification for any distortion degree. For examples, Q1.25 = 0.75Q1 + 0.25Q2, and Q8.5 = 0.5Q8 + 0.5Q9. 3.2 Distortion-aware Learnable Query Mechanism (DLQM) To achieve control over the rectification p… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results on synthetic fisheye images. method SC [40], regression-based methods DeepCalib [4] and Blind [23], and generation-based DR-GAN [24], PCN [52], DDA [54] and SimFIR [10]. For a fair comparison, we followed existing works [10,24,52,54] employing Peak …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results on real-world fisheye images. methods perform well [10, 24, 52, 54], QueryCDR still outperforms the second best method [54] by 0.60 dB of PSNR and 0.013 of SSIM. This further demon￾strates the outstanding generalization ability of QueryCDR. Qualitat…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual results of different modulation methods. This is because the controllable mechanism effectively assists the rectification network in distinguishing between different degrees of distortion, thereby enhanc￾ing the generalization capability of the rectification net…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 (2016)

    Ba, J.L., Kiros, J.R., Hinton, G.E.: Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 (2016)

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(8), 1327–1333 (2005)

    Barreto, J.P., Araujo, H.: Geometric properties of central catadioptric line images and their application in calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(8), 1327–1333 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05) Volume 1

    Barreto, J.P., Daniilidis, K.: Fundamental matrix for cameras with radial distor- tion. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05) Volume 1. vol. 1, pp. 625–632. IEEE (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH European Conference on Visual Media Production

    Bogdan, O., Eckstein, V., Rameau, F., Bazin, J.C.: Deepcalib: A deep learning approach for automatic intrinsic calibration of wide field-of-view cameras. In: Pro- ceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH European Conference on Visual Media Production. pp. 1–10 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Journal of mathematical imaging and vision45, 31–45 (2013)

    Bukhari, F., Dailey, M.N.: Automatic radial distortion estimation from a single image. Journal of mathematical imaging and vision45, 31–45 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    IEEE transactions on image processing25(11), 5187– 5198 (2016)

    Cai, B., Xu, X., Jia, K., Qing, C., Tao, D.: Dehazenet: An end-to-end system for single image haze removal. IEEE transactions on image processing25(11), 5187– 5198 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Cai, H., He, J., Qiao, Y., Dong, C.: Toward interactive modulation for photo- realistic image restoration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 294–303 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Machine vision and applications 13, 14–24 (2001)

    Devernay, F., Faugeras, O.: Straight lines have to be straight. Machine vision and applications 13, 14–24 (2001)

    work page 2001

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    Duan, Z., Tezcan, O., Nakamura, H., Ishwar, P., Konrad, J.: Rapid: rotation-aware people detection in overhead fisheye images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. pp. 636–637 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Feng, H., Wang, W., Deng, J., Zhou, W., Li, L., Li, H.: Simfir: A simple frame- work for fisheye image rectification with self-supervised representation learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 12418–12427 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    In: 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Urtasun, R.: Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. In: 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3354–3361. IEEE (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Communications of the ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Guo, J., Han, K., Wu, H., Tang, Y., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Xu, C.: Cmt: Convolu- tional neural networks meet vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12175–12185 (2022) 16 P. Guo et al

    2022

  6. [14]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intel- ligence 29(8), 1309–1321 (2007)

    Hartley, R., Kang, S.B.: Parameter-free radial distortion correction with center of distortion estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intel- ligence 29(8), 1309–1321 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    He, J., Dong, C., Qiao, Y.: Modulating image restoration with continual levels via adaptive feature modification layers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 11056–11064 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XX 16

    He, J., Dong, C., Qiao, Y.: Interactive multi-dimension modulation with dynamic controllable residual learning for image restoration. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XX 16. pp. 53–68. Springer (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    He,K.,Zhang,X.,Ren,S.,Sun,J.:Deepresiduallearningforimagerecognition.In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition

    Henrique Brito, J., Angst, R., Koser, K., Pollefeys, M.: Radial distortion self- calibration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition. pp. 1368–1375 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

    Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence33(12), 2410– 2422 (2011)

    Kukelova, Z., Pajdla, T.: A minimal solution to radial distortion autocalibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence33(12), 2410– 2422 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision

    Kumar, V.R., Klingner, M., Yogamani, S., Milz, S., Fingscheidt, T., Mader, P.: Syndistnet: Self-supervised monocular fisheye camera distance estimation syner- gized with semantic segmentation for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applicat...

    2021

  14. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszár, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al.: Photo-realistic single image super- resolution using a generative adversarial network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and...

    2017

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Li, X., Zhang, B., Sander, P.V., Liao, J.: Blind geometric distortion correction on images through deep learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 4855–4864 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology30(3), 725–733 (2019)

    Liao, K., Lin, C., Zhao, Y., Gabbouj, M.: Dr-gan: Automatic radial distortion rectification using conditional gan in real-time. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology30(3), 725–733 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 3707–3718 (2020)

    Liao, K., Lin, C., Zhao, Y., Xu, M.: Model-free distortion rectification framework bridged by distortion distribution map. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 3707–3718 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    IEEE transactions on Image Processing 21(12), 4844–4857 (2012)

    Lin, L., Lu, Y., Pan, Y., Chen, X.: Integrating graph partitioning and matching for trajectory analysis in video surveillance. IEEE transactions on Image Processing 21(12), 4844–4857 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    In: Computer Vision– ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13

    Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., Zitnick, C.L.: Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In: Computer Vision– ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13. pp. 740–755...

    2014

  20. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Liu, C., Wang, X., Li, S., Wang, Y., Qian, X.: Fsi: Frequency and spatial interactive learning for image restoration in under-display cameras. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 12537–12546 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification Network 17 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Liu, C., Wang, X., Xu, X., Tian, R., Li, S., Qian, X., Yang, M.H.: Motion-adaptive separable collaborative filters for blind motion deblurring. In: Proceedings of the QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllable Distortion Rectification Network 17 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liu, C., Yang, H., Fu, J., Qian, X.: Learning trajectory-aware transformer for video super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 5687–5696 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing32, 4742–4756 (2023)

    Liu, C., Yang, H., Fu, J., Qian, X.: 4d lut: learnable context-aware 4d lookup table for image enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing32, 4742–4756 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Mei, C., Rives, P.: Single view point omnidirectional camera calibration from pla- nar grids. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3945–3950. IEEE (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Mou, C., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Dong, C., Zhang, J., Shan, Y.: Metric learning based interactive modulation for real-world super-resolution. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 723–740. Springer (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems49(7), 1419–1434 (2018)

    Muhammad, K., Ahmad, J., Lv, Z., Bellavista, P., Yang, P., Baik, S.W.: Efficient deep cnn-based fire detection and localization in video surveillance applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems49(7), 1419–1434 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Peng, Z., Huang, W., Gu, S., Xie, L., Wang, Y., Jiao, J., Ye, Q.: Conformer: Local features coupling global representations for visual recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 367–376 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Plaut, E., Ben Yaacov, E., El Shlomo, B.: 3d object detection from a single fisheye image without a single fisheye training image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3659–3667 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 93, 101–114 (2011)

    Puig, L., Bastanlar, Y., Sturm, P., Guerrero, J.J., Barreto, J.: Calibration of central catadioptric cameras using a dlt-like approach. International Journal of Computer Vision 93, 101–114 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Rashed, H., Mohamed, E., Sistu, G., Kumar, V.R., Eising, C., El-Sallab, A., Yoga- mani, S.: Generalized object detection on fisheye cameras for autonomous driving: Dataset, representations and baseline. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Compu...

    2021

  31. [39]

    In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2016: 13th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part III 13

    Rong, J., Huang, S., Shang, Z., Ying, X.: Radial lens distortion correction us- ing convolutional neural networks trained with synthesized images. In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2016: 13th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Pa...

    2017

  32. [40]

    Image Processing On Line6, 326–364 (2016)

    Santana-Cedrés, D., Gomez, L., Alemán-Flores, M., Salgado, A., Esclarín, J., Ma- zorra, L., Alvarez, L.: An iterative optimization algorithm for lens distortion cor- rection using two-parameter models. Image Processing On Line6, 326–364 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    In: Fourth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Systems (ICVS’06)

    Scaramuzza, D., Martinelli, A., Siegwart, R.: A flexible technique for accurate omnidirectional camera calibration and structure from motion. In: Fourth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Systems (ICVS’06). pp. 45–45. IEEE (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    In: European Conference on Com- puter Vision

    Shen, Z., Lin, C., Liao, K., Nie, L., Zheng, Z., Zhao, Y.: Panoformer: Panorama transformer for indoor 360 depth estimation. In: European Conference on Com- puter Vision. pp. 195–211. Springer (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    In: Computer Vision-ECCV 2004: 8th European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic, May 11-14, 2004

    Sturm, P., Ramalingam, S.: A generic concept for camera calibration. In: Computer Vision-ECCV 2004: 8th European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic, May 11-14, 2004. Proceedings, Part II 8. pp. 1–13. Springer (2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    Mirage 2003 pp

    Thormählen, T., Broszio, H., Wassermann, I.: Robust line-based calibration of lens distortion from a single view. Mirage 2003 pp. 105–112 (2003) 18 P. Guo et al

    2003

  37. [45]

    Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems 30 (2017)

    Vaswani,A.,Shazeer,N.,Parmar,N.,Uszkoreit,J.,Jones,L.,Gomez,A.N.,Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision35, 165–172 (2009)

    Wang, A., Qiu, T., Shao, L.: A simple method of radial distortion correction with centre of distortion estimation. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision35, 165–172 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Wang,W.,Guo,R.,Tian,Y.,Yang,W.:Cfsnet:Towardacontrollablefeaturespace for image restoration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4140–4149 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang, X., Yu, K., Dong, C., Tang, X., Loy, C.C.: Deep network interpolation for continuous imagery effect transition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1692–1701 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    In: Proceed- ings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops

    Wang, X., Yu, K., Wu, S., Gu, J., Liu, Y., Dong, C., Qiao, Y., Change Loy, C.: Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In: Proceed- ings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops. pp. 0–0 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Xue,Z.,Xue,N.,Xia,G.S.,Shen,W.:Learningtocalibratestraightlinesforfisheye image rectification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1643–1651 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing30, 5641–5651 (2021)

    Yang, C.Y., Chen, H.H.: Efficient face detection in the fisheye image domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing30, 5641–5651 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Yang, S., Lin, C., Liao, K., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y.: Progressively complementary networkforfisheyeimagerectificationusingappearanceflow.In:Proceedingsofthe IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 6348– 6357 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.01925 (2022)

    Yang, S., Lin, C., Liao, K., Zhao, Y.: Fishformer: Annulus slicing-based trans- former for fisheye rectification with efficacy domain exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.01925 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11785 (2023)

    Yang, S., Lin, C., Liao, K., Zhao, Y.: Dual diffusion architecture for fisheye im- age rectification: Synthetic-to-real generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11785 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    Yao, M., He, D., Li, X., Li, F., Xiong, Z.: Towards interactive self-supervised de- noising. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV)

    Yin, X., Wang, X., Yu, J., Zhang, M., Fua, P., Tao, D.: Fisheyerecnet: A multi- context collaborative deep network for fisheye image rectification. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 469–484 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Yogamani, S., Hughes, C., Horgan, J., Sistu, G., Varley, P., O’Dea, D., Uricár, M., Milz, S., Simon, M., Amende, K., et al.: Woodscape: A multi-task, multi- camera fisheye dataset for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Visi...

    2019

  50. [58]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017)

    Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., Zhang, L.: Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE transactions on image processing 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zhang, M., Yao, J., Xia, M., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.: Line-based multi-label energy optimization for fisheye image rectification and calibration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 4137– 4145 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Zhang, Y., You, S., Gevers, T.: Automatic calibration of the fisheye camera for egocentric 3d human pose estimation from a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. pp. 1772–1781 (2021) QueryCDR: Query-Based Controllabl...

    2021

  53. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zhang, Z., Jiang, Y., Shao, W., Wang, X., Luo, P., Lin, K., Gu, J.: Real-time controllable denoising for image and video. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 14028–14038 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 40(6), 1452–1464 (2017)

    Zhou, B., Lapedriza, A., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Places: A 10 million image database for scene recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 40(6), 1452–1464 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.