Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Non-collapsing of Ricci shrinkers with bounded curvature

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a simply connected Ricci shrinker with $|\mathrm{Rm}|\le A$ and finite second homotopy group has entropy $\mu(g)\ge -C(n,A)$, ruling out collapse under bounded curvature.

desk verdict A substantial non-collapsing theorem whose proof has one load-bearing convexity step that is asserted but not justified; worth refereeing if that gap can be closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13546 v1 pith:UYQAXLXR submitted 2024-12-18 math.DG

Conghan Dong , Yu Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C4453E2053C2353C21
keywords Riccishrinkerentropynon-collapsingBakry-ÉmeryconditionGromov-Hausdorfflimittorusactionsecondvariationdiffeomorphismfiniteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a uniform non-collapsing theorem for Ricci shrinkers under a curvature bound and a mild topological hypothesis. If a simply connected Ricci shrinker with $|\mathrm{Rm}| \le A$ and finite second homotopy group had entropy tending to $-\infty$, its unit balls would shrink to zero volume; the paper shows this cannot happen, so the entropy is bounded below by a constant $C(n,A)$. The proof analyzes the collapsed limit, shows the collapse is a stable torus fibration, and constructs a noncompact $\mathbb{R}$-bundle over the limit on which the Ricci-shrinker equation leaves the Bakry-Émery lower bound $\mathrm{Rc}(g_W)+\nabla^2 \bar{f}_W \ge \tfrac12 g_W$. A second-variation argument along the noncompact fibers then contradicts the existence of the collapse. The same method, after a Ricci-flow smoothing step, yields a volume lower bound for a wider class of smooth metric measure spaces satisfying only $\mathrm{Rc}+\nabla^2 f \ge \kappa g$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\mathbb{R}$-bundle $W$ over the collapsing limit $X$, constructed by unwrapping one circle factor of the torus action that realizes the collapse. Bounded curvature collapsing theory first gives a singular fibration of the manifolds over the limit, and the topological hypotheses turn the fibers into tori with a stable action; the paper then lifts the fibration to the frame bundle, unwraps a circle to a real line, and quotients back down to obtain $W$. On the regular part $R_W$, a density function $\mu$ built from the fiber metrics through O'Neill tensors (the tensors that measure the geometry of a Riemannian submersion) is added to the limiting potential, yielding the key inequality (4.16). The contradiction comes from the second variation formula: along a minimizing geodesic on a noncompact $\mathbb{R}$-orbit, the curvature lower bound forces an integral estimate whose left side grows linearly with the orbital distance while the right side remains bounded.

What would settle it

One concrete check: try to build a sequence of simply connected Ricci shrinkers with $|\mathrm{Rm}|\le A$, finite $\pi_2$, and $\operatorname{Vol}_g(B_g(p,1))\to 0$; the theorem says none exists. At the proof level, examine the regular set $R_W$ of the $\mathbb{R}$-bundle $W$ produced by the unwrapping and look for a minimizing geodesic between two regular points on the same $\mathbb{R}$-orbit that leaves $R_W$; exhibiting one would remove the contradiction argument's force.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for every Ricci shrinker $(M^n,g,f)$ with $|\mathrm{Rm}| \le A$, $M$ simply connected, and $\pi_2(M)$ finite, the entropy satisfies $\mu(g) \ge -C(n,A)$. By Lemma 2.3 this is equivalent to a uniform lower bound $\operatorname{Vol}_g(B_g(p,1)) \ge c(n,A)>0$, so the statement is genuinely non-collapsing. The proof is by contradiction: a sequence with $\mu(g_i)\to -\infty$ converges in the pointed Gromov-Hausdorff sense to a lower-dimensional orbifold, the collapse is realized by a stable $T^k$-action, and an unwrapping of one circle factor produces an $\mathbb{R}$-bundle $W$ over the limit. On the regular part of $W$ the limiting potential, augmented by a density function coming from the torus fibers, satisfies $\mathrm{Rc}(g_W)+\nabla^2 \bar{f}_W \ge \tfrac12 g_W$. The second variation formula for a minimizing geodesic joining two points on a noncompact $\mathbb{R}$-orbit then gives an inequality whose left side grows without bound while the right side stays finite. Theorem 1.4 extends the same conclusion to the class $\mathcal N(n,A,\kappa)$ defined by $|\mathrm{Rm}|\le A$, $|\nabla^2 f|\le A$, and $\mathrm{Rc}+\nabla^2 f\ge \kappa g$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the premise, stated in one sentence in Section 4 just before the second-variation estimate, that the regular part of the constructed $\mathbb{R}$-bundle $W$ is geodesically convex, so the minimizing geodesic between two regular points on the same orbit never enters the singular set; if that convexity fails for the metric produced by the unwrapping, the contradiction collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Corollary 1.2: for fixed $n$ and $A$, only finitely many diffeomorphism types of simply connected $n$-manifolds with finite $\pi_2$ admit a Ricci shrinker metric with $|\mathrm{Rm}|\le A$.
  • A uniform entropy lower bound is equivalent to a uniform lower bound on unit-ball volume, so the theorem is a non-collapsing statement in the usual geometric sense.
  • The non-collapsing bound extends to all spaces in the class $\mathcal N(n,A,\kappa)$ satisfying only the Bakry-Émery inequality, after a Ricci-flow smoothing step.
  • If the theorem is right, any sequence of such shrinkers with entropy tending to $-\infty$ is impossible, so the moduli space of these shrinkers has no collapsing boundary component.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not stated in the paper, but the unwrapping construction is probably reusable: any collapsing sequence with bounded curvature and a Bakry-Émery lower bound should produce an $\mathbb{R}$-bundle limit satisfying the same inequality, so the non-collapsing phenomenon may extend to other geometric flows.
  • The proof's reliance on geodesic convexity of the regular set could be bypassed: if one proved directly that minimizing geodesics between regular points on the same $\mathbb{R}$-orbit stay regular for the specific quotient metric, the external isotropy lemma would not be needed.
  • Since Ricci shrinkers have finite fundamental group, the simply-connected hypothesis may be replaceable by a condition on the universal cover, with the finite-second-homotopy assumption applied there.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a uniform lower bound for Perelman's entropy of n-dimensional simply connected Ricci shrinkers with bounded curvature and finite second homotopy group: if |Rm|≤A, then μ(g)≥−C(n,A). By Lemma 2.3 this is equivalent to a uniform non-collapsing bound Vol(B_g(p,1))≥c(n,A). The proof is by contradiction: assuming μ→−∞, the authors use Cheeger–Fukaya–Gromov collapsing theory to obtain T^k-invariant approximations and a stable limit, unwrap a circle factor to construct a noncompact R-bundle W over the collapsing limit, derive the Bakry–Emery inequality Rc(g_W)+Hess(\bar f_W)≥(1/2)g_W on the regular stratum RW, and reach a contradiction from the second variation of minimizing geodesics inside a single R-orbit. Section 5 extends the theorem to a class of smooth metric measure spaces satisfying only Rc+∇²f≥κg, after a Ricci-flow smoothing step.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it provides a new compactness/non-collapsing result for Ricci shrinkers under only curvature and topological assumptions, and it generalizes to the Bakry–Emery setting the Petrunin–Rong–Tuschmann non-collapsing strategy. The paper contains substantial technical content: the collapsing fibration, the use of finite π2 to obtain stable T^k-actions, the unwrapping construction, and the second-variation estimate are all developed with quantitative lemmas. The extension to metric measure spaces is an interesting and plausible strengthening. However, the proof currently rests on an unverified geodesic-convexity assertion for the regular set RW, so the central claim is plausible but not fully established in the version under review.

major comments (1)
  1. The contradiction argument requires that the minimizing geodesic γ from w0 to wl lie entirely in the regular stratum RW, since (4.16) and the second variation estimate (4.17) are established only on RW. The only justification supplied is the sentence 'Since RW is geodesically convex by Kleiner's isotropy lemma [32]'. This is a load-bearing assertion, and none of the hypotheses needed for the lemma are verified for the specific space W=Z/G constructed in this section. The paper does not establish a lower curvature bound on (Z,g_Z) or (W,g_W) outside RW; the only inequality available is the Bakry–Emery inequality (4.16) on RW itself. If Kleiner's lemma requires nonnegative sectional curvature or some special isotropy condition, those hypotheses are not shown to hold here; if it is intended as a general fact about orbit spaces, the authors should state it precisely, since in general finite-group orbit spaces can have minimizing geodesics between regular points passing through singular strata. Without geodesic convexity of RW, the application of (4.17) along γ is unjustified and the contradiction (4.19) does not follow. This gap must be repaired by proving the needed convexity for this W or by replacing the step with an argument that does not require the entire minimizing geodesic to avoid the singular part.
minor comments (4)
  1. In the final bound of (4.19), the notation 'B_gW(w,1)' should refer to a fixed ball around w0, and the second supremum is written over [d_l, d_l-1], which is reversed; it should be [d_l-1, d_l].
  2. The sentence 'The estimates for the potential function and its gradient are derived using Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.4' is misleading: after the smoothing step of Theorem 5.10, the relevant estimates are those of Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 (and Proposition 5.7), not the Ricci-flow Lemma 5.4.
  3. Because the convexity of RW is cited to Kleiner's PhD thesis [32], the authors should quote the exact statement of the isotropy lemma and its hypotheses in the paper; the thesis is not readily accessible and the current one-sentence invocation is not verifiable by the reader.
  4. The text contains several typographical artifacts, for example 'Y u Li' in the author line and 'nelement' in Section 5; these should be cleaned before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: Theorem 1.1 is proved by contradiction with external collapsing machinery; self-citations are independent structural lemmas, and the Kleiner convexity assertion is a non-circular correctness caveat.

full rationale

The derivation chain assumes entropy tending to -infinity and obtains a contradiction through Cheeger-Fukaya-Gromov nilpotent structure, Rong's T^k-action stability, the unwrapping construction, inequality (4.16) obtained from O'Neill's formula, and the second variation estimate (4.17)-(4.19). No parameter is fitted and no output quantity is defined in terms of an input quantity. The cited results co-authored by the authors ([31], [33], [34]) supply the entropy-volume equivalence (Lemma 2.3), entropy identities, and Ricci-shrinker compactness; these are parameter-free prior results whose assumptions do not include the target uniform entropy bound, so they constitute independent support rather than circular premises. The only flagged step is the sentence immediately before (4.17), 'Since RW is geodesically convex by Kleiner's isotropy lemma [32]', which is load-bearing but external; whether it applies to the particular quotient W constructed in the paper is a verification gap, not a reduction of the theorem to its own assumptions. The paper therefore exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical constants are fitted; all constants C(n,A), C(n,A,kappa) arise from estimates with quantified dependencies. The R-bundle W and intermediate spaces Z and F are constructed objects within the proof, not independently postulated entities with falsifiable consequences.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Cheeger-Fukaya-Gromov collapsing theory: sequences with |Rm| <= A and collapsing entropy admit pure N-structures and singular fibrations over a lower-dimensional limit.
    Used as black box to obtain the fibration Phi_i and frame bundle fibration in Theorem 3.10; cited to [12],[13],[21],[22],[23],[11],[46].
  • standard math Local structure of the collapsing limit: X is an orbifold away from a singular set of codimension at least 3 and f_X is smooth in orbifold sense.
    Proposition 3.6, based on [38, Theorem 1.1], used to set up unwrapping over the regular part.
  • standard math Rong's fibration/torus theorem: under the topological assumptions, the nilpotent fibers are tori T^k and the structure group reduces to T^k; the T^k-action commutes with SO(n) or Spin(n).
    Propositions 3.13 and 3.14, cited to [45], Malcev rigidity [36], and homotopy exact sequences.
  • standard math Topological stability lemma of Petrunin-Tuschmann: principal T^k-bundles over a simply connected base with finite pi_2 total space are weakly G-diffeomorphic up to GL(Z,k) automorphism.
    Proposition 4.1 uses [44, Key Lemma 2.6] to identify all F_i up to diffeomorphism; this is the point where finite second homotopy group enters.
  • domain assumption Kleiner's isotropy lemma implies RW is geodesically convex in W.
    Invoked in Section 4 before (4.17) to ensure minimizing geodesics stay in the regular set; the hypotheses of the lemma for the constructed quotient metric are not discussed.
  • standard math Ricci flow existence, Shi estimates, and heat kernel estimates for complete noncompact manifolds with bounded curvature.
    Section 5 relies on [48],[47],[16],[10],[49] to smooth M(n,A,kappa) spaces and create uniform higher-order estimates.
  • standard math Second variation formula and index form inequality for minimizing geodesics.
    Equation (4.17) in Section 4; standard Riemannian geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-collapsing of Ricci shrinkers with bounded curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UYQAXLXR

@misc{pith2026241213546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-collapsing of Ricci shrinkers with bounded curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UYQAXLXR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13546}
}
read the original abstract

We establish a uniform entropy bound for simply connected Ricci shrinkers with a finite second homotopy group and a uniform curvature bound. Additionally, we extend the non-collapsing result to a broader class of smooth metric measure spaces satisfying Bakry-\'Emery conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Kleiner, Riemannian four-manifolds with nonnegative curvature and continuous symmetry, Ph.D

    B. Kleiner, Riemannian four-manifolds with nonnegative curvature and continuous symmetry, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1990

    work page 1990

  2. [31]

    Huang, Y

    S. Huang, Y . Li, B. Wang, On the regular-convexity of Ricci shrinker limit spaces , Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal), 77 1(2021), 99-136

    work page 2021

  3. [33]

    H. Li, Y . Li, B. Wang, On the structure of Ricci shrinkers , J. Funct. Anal., 280(2021), no.9, 108955

    work page 2021

  4. [34]

    Y . Li, B. Wang, Heat kernel on Ricci shrinkers , Calc. V ar. Partial. Di ffer. Equ. 59 (2020), article 194

    work page 2020

  5. [1]

    Bakas, S

    I. Bakas, S. Kong, L. Ni, Ancient solutions of Ricci flow on spheres and generalized Ho pf fibrations , J. Reine Angew. Math., 663 (2012), 209-248

    work page 2012

  6. [2]

    Bamler, C

    R. Bamler, C. Cifarelli, R. Conlon, A. Deruelle, A new complete two-dimensional shrinking gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci soliton, Geom. Funct. Anal. 34, 377–392 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [3]

    Burago, Y

    D. Burago, Y . Burago, S. Ivanov, A course in metric geometry, Graduate Studies in Mathemat- ics, vol. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R I, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [4]

    Bierstone, The equivariant covering homotopy property for di fferentiable G-fibre bundles , J

    E. Bierstone, The equivariant covering homotopy property for di fferentiable G-fibre bundles , J. Differential Geom. 8 (1973), 615-622,

    work page 1973

Show all 52 references
  1. [5]

    G. E. Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, volume 46 of Pure and applied mathematics. Academic, New Y ork, 1972

    1972

  2. [6]

    Buser, H

    P . Buser, H. Karcher, Gromov’s almost flat manifolds , Ast´ erisque 81, Soc. Math. France, Paris (1981)

    1981

  3. [7]

    Cao, B.-L

    H.-D. Cao, B.-L. Chen, X.-P . Zhu, Recent developments on Hamilton’s Ricci flow , Surveys in differential geometry, V ol. XII. Geometric flows, 47-112, Surv. Differ. Geom., 12, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2008. 32

    2008

  4. [8]

    H.-D. Cao, D. Zhou, On complete gradient shrinking Ricci solitons , J. Di ffer. Geom., 85(2010), no. 2, 175-186

    2010

  5. [9]

    Carrillo, L

    J. Carrillo, L. Ni, Sharp logarithmic Sobolev inequalities on gradient solito ns and applica- tions, Comm. Anal. Geom., 17 (4):721-753, 2009

    2009

  6. [10]

    A. Chau, L. F. Tam, C. J. Y u, Pseudolocality for the Ricci flow and applications , Canad. J. Math., V ol. 63(1), 2011, 55-85

    2011

  7. [11]

    Cheeger, K

    J. Cheeger, K. Fukaya, M. Gromov, Nilpotent Structures and Invariant Metrics on Collapsed Manifolds, Journal of the American Mathematical Society V ol. 5, No. 2 ( Apr., 1992), pp. 327-372

    1992

  8. [12]

    Cheeger, M

    J. Cheeger, M. Gromov, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while keeping their curva ture bounded. part I, J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), 309–346

    1986

  9. [13]

    Cheeger, M

    J. Cheeger, M. Gromov, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while keeping their curva ture bounded. part II, J. Di fferential Geom. 32 (1990), 269-298

    1990

  10. [14]

    Chen, Strong uniqueness of the Ricci flow , J

    B.-L. Chen, Strong uniqueness of the Ricci flow , J. Differ. Geom., 82(2009), no. 2, 363-382

    2009

  11. [15]

    X. Chen, Y . Li, On the geometry of asymptotically flat manifolds , Geom. Topol., 25(5):2469- 2572, 2021

    2021

  12. [16]

    B. Chow, P . Lu, L. Ni, Hamilton’s Ricci Flow , Lecture in Contemporary Mathematics, 3, Science Press and Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 77, meri can Mathematical Society, 2006

    2006

  13. [17]

    Cifarelli, R

    C. Cifarelli, R. J. Conlon, A. Deruelle, On finite time Type I singularities of the K¨ ahler–Ricci flow on compact K¨ ahler surfaces. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2024)

    2024

  14. [18]

    R. J. Conlon, A. Deruelle, S. Sun, Classification results for expanding and shrinking gradien t K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons, Geom. Topol., 28(1):267–351, 2024

    2024

  15. [19]

    Dong, Three-manifolds with bounded curvature and uniformly posi tive scalar curvature , The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33.6 (2023): 169

    C. Dong, Three-manifolds with bounded curvature and uniformly posi tive scalar curvature , The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33.6 (2023): 169

    2023

  16. [20]

    F. Fang, X. Rong, Positive Pinching, V olume and Second Betti Number, Geom. funct. anal. 9, 641-674 (1999)

    1999

  17. [21]

    Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension s, J

    K. Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension s, J. Di fferential Geom. V olume 25, Number 1 (1987), 139-156

    1987

  18. [22]

    Fukaya, A boundary of the set of the Riemannian manifolds with bounde d curvatures and diameters, J

    K. Fukaya, A boundary of the set of the Riemannian manifolds with bounde d curvatures and diameters, J. Di fferential Geom. V olume 28, Number 1 (1988), 1-21

    1988

  19. [23]

    Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension II, J

    K. Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension II, J. Math. Soc. Japan 41 (1989), 333-356

    1989

  20. [24]

    Fukaya, HausdorffConvergence of Riemannian Manifolds and Its Applications, Adv

    K. Fukaya, HausdorffConvergence of Riemannian Manifolds and Its Applications, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 1990: 143-238 (1990). 33

    1990

  21. [25]

    Gigli, Lecture notes on di fferential calculus on RCD spaces , Publ

    N. Gigli, Lecture notes on di fferential calculus on RCD spaces , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 54 (2018), no. 4, 855-918

    2018

  22. [26]

    Gromov, Almost flat manifolds , J

    M. Gromov, Almost flat manifolds , J. Di fferential Geom. 13(2): 231-241 (1978)

    1978

  23. [27]

    R. S. Hamilton, The formation of singularities in the Ricci flow , Surveys in Differential Geom., 2(1995), 7-136, International Press

    1995

  24. [28]

    Haslhofer, R

    R. Haslhofer, R. M¨ uller, A compactness theorem for complete Ricci shrinkers , Geom. Funct. Anal., 21(2011), 1091-1116

    2011

  25. [29]

    Haslhofer and R

    R. Haslhofer and R. M¨ uller, A note on the compactness theorem for 4d Ricci shrinkers , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 143(2015), 4433–4437

    2015

  26. [30]

    Huang, ǫ-regularity and structure of four-dimensional shrinking R icci solitons, Int

    S. Huang, ǫ-regularity and structure of four-dimensional shrinking R icci solitons, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 5 (2020), 1511-1574

    2020

  27. [35]

    Y . Li, B. Wang, On K¨ ahler Ricci shrinker surfaces, arXiv:2301.09784

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    A. I. Malcev, On a class of homogeneous spaces , Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. No. 39 (1951), 276-307

    1951

  29. [37]

    Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curva ture, J

    A. Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curva ture, J. Reine Angew. Math. 645(2010), 125-153

    2010

  30. [38]

    Naber, G

    A. Naber, G. Tian, Geometric structures of collapsing Riemannian manifolds I , Surveys in geometric analysis and relativity, 439-66, Adv. Lect. Math . (ALM), 20, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2011

    2011

  31. [39]

    Naber, G

    A. Naber, G. Tian, Geometric structures of collapsing Riemannian manifolds I I, J. Reine Angew. Math. 744 (2018), 103-132

    2018

  32. [40]

    L. Ni, N. Wallach, On a classification of gradient shrinking solitons , Math. Res. Lett. 15(2008), no. 5, 941-955

    2008

  33. [41]

    O’Neill, The fundamental equations of a submersion, Michigan Math

    B. O’Neill, The fundamental equations of a submersion, Michigan Math. J. 13 (1966) 459-469

    1966

  34. [42]

    Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric appli cations, arXiv:math.DG/0211159

    G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric appli cations, arXiv:math.DG/0211159. 34

  35. [43]

    Petrunin, X

    A. Petrunin, X. Rong, W. Tuschmann, Collapsing vs. Positive Pinching, Geom. funct. anal. 9, 699–735 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    Petrunin, W

    A. Petrunin, W. Tuschmann, Diffeomorphism Finiteness, Positive Pinching, and Second Ho- motopy, Geom. funct. anal. 9, 736–774 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    Rong, On the Fundamental Groups of Manifolds of Positive Sectiona l Curvature, Ann

    X. Rong, On the Fundamental Groups of Manifolds of Positive Sectiona l Curvature, Ann. of Math.143, p. 397-411 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Rong, Convergence and Collapsing Theorems in Riemannian Geometry, Handbook of geo- metric analysis, No

    X. Rong, Convergence and Collapsing Theorems in Riemannian Geometry, Handbook of geo- metric analysis, No. 2, Advanced Lectures in Mathematics, I nt. Press, Somerville, MA, 2010, 193-299

    2010

  39. [47]

    Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds , J

    W.-X. Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds , J. Di ffer. Geom., 30(1989), no. 2, 223-301

    1989

  40. [48]

    Shi, Ricci deformation of the metric on complete noncompact Riem annian manifolds, J

    W.-X. Shi, Ricci deformation of the metric on complete noncompact Riem annian manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 30(2): 303-394 (1989)

    1989

  41. [49]

    Shi, Ricci flow and the uniformization on complete noncompact K¨ a hler manifolds , J

    W.-X. Shi, Ricci flow and the uniformization on complete noncompact K¨ a hler manifolds , J. Differential Geom. 45(1): 94-220 (1997)

    1997

  42. [50]

    Wylie, Complete shrinking Ricci solitons have finite fundamental g roup, Proc

    W. Wylie, Complete shrinking Ricci solitons have finite fundamental g roup, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,136(5) (2007), 1803-1806

    2007

  43. [51]

    Y okota, Perelman’s reduced volume and a gap theorem for the Ricci flow , Comm

    T. Y okota, Perelman’s reduced volume and a gap theorem for the Ricci flow , Comm. Anal. Geom.,17 (2009), no. 2, 227-263

    2009

  44. [52]

    Y okota, Addendum to ‘Perelman’s reduced volume and a gap theorem for the Ricci flow’ , Comm

    T. Y okota, Addendum to ‘Perelman’s reduced volume and a gap theorem for the Ricci flow’ , Comm. Anal. Geom., 20 (2012), no. 5, 949-955. Conghan Dong, Simons Laufer Mathematical Sciences Institu te, 17 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States, Email: conghan.dong@duke.edu. ...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.