Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 41 references

Optical Power Beaming in the Lunar Environment

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electrostatically lofted lunar dust significantly attenuates ground-to-ground laser power in sunlit regions, making optical power beaming more viable in permanently shadowed areas or during lunar night.

desk verdict Solid T-matrix and Gaussian-beam toolkit, but the headline "significant dust attenuation" rests on a centimeters-as-meters slip and 15 km links that violate the paper's own line-of-sight limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14083 v1 pith:4AKYJCMX submitted 2024-12-18 physics.optics physics.space-ph

Mohamed Naqbi , Sebastien Loranger , Gunes Karabulut Kurt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.space-ph
keywords opticalpowerbeamingloftedlunardustattenuationT-matrixmethodGaussianbeamtheorypermanentlyshadowedregionsnightwirelesstransmission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that electrostatically lofted lunar dust is a first-order obstacle for ground-to-ground optical power beaming in sunlit polar regions, causing exponential attenuation that grows with distance and shrinks with height. The authors model dust extinction with the T-matrix method for elongated spheroid particles and combine it with Gaussian beam propagation to optimize transmitter and receiver apertures. They find that raising a link only a few metres above the surface removes most of the dust penalty, and that with optimal focusing, multi-kilowatt power can be delivered over tens of kilometres with reasonable aperture sizes. The practical upshot is that on the Moon, dark regions—permanently shadowed craters or the lunar night—are the favourable places for OPB, not illuminated ones.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the exponential dust transmission law $\eta_{\text{dust}}(h,z) = \exp[-n(h)\,\langle C_{\text{ext}}\rangle\,z]$, which ties the near-surface dust number density $n(h)$ (Eq. 21, a least-squares fit from published dusty-plasma theory) to the orientation-averaged extinction cross-section $\langle C_{\text{ext}}\rangle$ obtained with the T-matrix method—a numerical light-scattering technique for non-spherical particles—and to the path length $z$. Gaussian beam theory supplies the companion design equations: the transmitter–receiver aperture relation and the focusing-lens equations that determine the maximum achievable range for a given aperture pair. The T-matrix calculation converts the elongated, irregular shape of lunar dust into a computable extinction cross-section, while the radiative-transfer assumptions reduce multiple-scattering effects to a single exponential.

What would settle it

Set up a 1064 nm laser and receiver on an illuminated polar region, both about half a metre above the ground at a known short distance apart, and compare the received power with what Eq. (21) predicts; if the measured loss is much smaller than predicted at these heights, the central attenuation claim is overestimated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that small charged dust grains lofted by photoelectric charging in sunlit lunar polar regions produce substantial extinction at 1064 nm: along a 5 km ground-to-ground path near the surface the dust transmission efficiency drops sharply, and a 5 kW transmitter delivering over 15 km yields 774 W at 0.5 m height versus 1947 W at 9 m height, where the dust influence becomes negligible. The attenuation law is $\eta_{\text{dust}} = \exp[-n(h)\,\langle C_{\text{ext}}\rangle\,z]$, with the number density $n(h)$ following a logarithmic profile fitted to published dusty-plasma models and the orientation-averaged extinction cross-section $\langle C_{\text{ext}}\rangle$ computed by the T-matrix method for prolate spheroids with aspect ratio 1.428 and complex refractive index $1.733+i0.05$. The paper further shows that a focusing lens extends the maximum transmission distance when the receiver sits within or near the Rayleigh range, while a collimated beam is optimal far beyond it.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion stands on a published curve for how many dust grains float at each height near the surface—fitted without error bars and stated as valid only below 868 cm—plus the assumption that this density is the same all along the beam.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lunar OPB systems in illuminated regions should be designed with elevation: raising both transmitter and receiver to several metres nearly eliminates dust-induced loss, so masts or towers become part of the power architecture.
  • Permanently shadowed regions and the lunar night, where electrostatic lofting is negligible, are the preferred sites for ground-to-ground optical power delivery.
  • With optimal focusing, a given transmitter–receiver aperture pair can reach targets far beyond the Rayleigh range; when the target is far outside that range, a collimated beam performs just as well as a focused one.
  • Delivering multiple kilowatts over distances up to tens of kilometres is feasible with current technology, provided the dust penalty is managed by height or by choosing a dark site.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same exponential dust-attenuation framework could be applied to other dusty, low-gravity bodies such as Mars or asteroids by substituting the appropriate density profile; the height-versus-attenuation trade-off would likely recur wherever electrostatic lofting operates.
  • If future measurements revise the fitted dust density downward, the paper's absolute numbers (e.g., the height at which dust loss becomes negligible) would shrink, but the qualitative guidance to prefer shadowed or night locations would probably survive because it depends on the presence of electrostatic lofting, not its exact magnitude.
  • A natural testable extension is a dedicated lunar lander experiment that measures near-surface laser extinction at several heights; such data would both validate Eq. (21) and de-risk engineering decisions for operational OPB systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript models ground-to-ground optical power beaming (OPB) on the lunar surface, combining a T-matrix treatment of light scattering by electrostatically lofted dust with Gaussian beam propagation and transmitter/receiver aperture optimization. The central quantitative claim is that dust attenuation is significant for near-surface links in illuminated regions, making permanently shadowed regions or lunar night preferable, and that with optimized focusing, OPB can span tens of kilometers with reasonable aperture sizes. The optical-aperture analysis is self-contained and standard, but the dust-attenuation conclusion is based on path geometries that the paper's own line-of-sight model rules out.

Significance. If the dust-attenuation results were robust, the paper would fill a real gap by quantifying a poorly understood environmental loss for lunar power beaming. The T-matrix and Gaussian beam calculations are standard, and the aperture-optimization section is credible and complete. However, the internal inconsistency between the 15 km examples and the line-of-sight limits undermines the headline claim; once the examples are moved to allowed geometries, the predicted dust loss is modest (at most ~15% at the lowest height). The paper remains potentially useful as a design-oriented model, but its main conclusion needs substantial revision rather than a minor correction.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III.B.1 and §III.B.2, Eq. (23)] The dust-attenuation examples that motivate the abstract's claim of significant attenuation use 15 km links at heights of 0.5–9 m (e.g., 5 kW gives 774 W at 0.5 m and 1947 W at 9 m). Equation (23) gives a maximum line-of-sight of approximately 2.6 km at h = 0.5 m and 11.2 km at h = 9 m on a spherical Moon with R = 1737 km; the 15 km example is geometrically impossible for all four heights. Using the attenuation coefficients implied by the 15 km numbers (α ≈ 6.2e-5, 3.2e-5, 1.3e-5, and 0.7e-6 m^-1 for h = 0.5, 2, 5, and 9 m) at the corresponding LoS-valid distances gives η_dust ≈ 0.85, 0.85, 0.90, and 0.99, so the dust loss is at most ~15% in the allowed regime, not the ~60% loss suggested by the 15 km case. Since the paper's own Limitations subsection restricts the model to 'a few kilometers at most,' the quantitative basis for the 'significant attenuation' conclusion is unsupported. The paper should recompute the dust-loss figures at geometrically consistent distances or explicitly restrict the claim to elevated transmitter/receiver configurations.
  2. [§II.B.1, hypothesis (5) and §III.B.2] The radiative-transfer model adopts the hypothesis that the particle distribution is 'uniform along the optical path,' and Section III.B.2 later notes this is valid only for distances 'typically below 5 km.' For a 15 km path at h = 0.5 m, the beam's height over a spherical Moon varies by more than 16 m at the chord midpoint, so the dust density n(h) is far from uniform; using the surface value n(0.5 m) along the entire path overestimates the integrated attenuation by a large factor. To make the dust-loss calculation physically consistent, the authors should integrate n(h(z)) along the actual ray path (e.g., using h(z) = h_t + z^2/(8R) to first order) or explicitly restrict the analysis to paths where the flat-surface assumption holds.
  3. [§II.B.3, Eqs. (21) and (17)] The dust number density profile n(h) = −4.166e8 ln(h/868) is a least-squares fit from Ref. [30] with no stated uncertainty, and it diverges as h → 0. The mean extinction cross-section in Eq. (17) is computed by averaging ⟨C_ext(r)⟩ over a uniform distribution of radii from 0 to 200 nm, but no justification or sensitivity analysis is provided for this implicit size distribution. Because η_dust = exp(−n⟨C_ext⟩z) is exponential in the product of these quantities, a factor-of-two change in either n or ⟨C_ext⟩ changes a 15% loss to roughly 28% or 4% at a few kilometers, which is enough to alter the qualitative conclusion. The authors should state the uniform-size-distribution assumption explicitly, discuss the divergence of Eq. (21) at small h, and provide sensitivity of the central results to the density and size-distribution parameters.
  4. [§II.B.3 and §IV] The conclusion that OPB is more suitable in permanently shadowed regions or during lunar night relies on the statement that electrostatic lofting is negligible in dark regions, for which Ref. [8] is cited. Ref. [8] is a self-cited conference paper that is not summarized or independently verified in this manuscript. Because this is a load-bearing premise for the dark-region recommendation, the authors should summarize the evidence from Ref. [8] (or cite independent measurements/models) so the reader can assess the claim without retrieving an external paper.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§II.B.3, Eq. (17)] In Eq. (17), the integral is missing the differential element dr; it should read ∫_{r_min}^{r_max} ⟨C_ext(r)⟩ dr.
  2. [§III.B.1, before Figure 7] The sentence 'For a realistic transmission distance of 5 km, the losses are estimated' is incomplete and does not state the estimated value; either give the number or remove the sentence.
  3. [§III.B.2, Eq. (23)] The derivation of Eq. (23) is said to be in the appendix, but no appendix is present in the manuscript; please include the derivation or remove the reference to the appendix.
  4. [Table I] The term 'EHCE' in Table I is not defined in the text; η_Rx is used elsewhere, so the table should use consistent notation.
  5. [§II.B.3] The phrase 'the density tends to vary only slightly with the subsolar angle' is vague; please give the expected range of variation or cite a specific figure from Ref. [30].
  6. [Figure 4 caption] Figure 4 caption mentions 'the average particle size marker used' but does not define how it is computed in the caption; the definition in Section II.B.3 should be referenced.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The illuminated-region dust attenuation is a self-contained calculation; the darker-region recommendation is imported from the authors' own Ref. [8] and is load-bearing, but the central quantitative result remains independent.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section II.B.3 (Lunar Dust Attenuation Model), after Eq. (21); echoed in the Abstract.]
    "We do not analyze the effect in dark regions since [8] has shown this effect to be negligible. ... The results indicate that LLD significantly attenuates ground-to-ground optical power transmission in illuminated regions, thus making OPB more suitable in darker areas, such as permanently shadowed regions or during the lunar night."

    The headline comparative conclusion that OPB is more suitable in darker areas is not derived in this manuscript: the dark-region dust density is never modeled, and the premise that electrostatic lofting is negligible there is supported only by Ref. [8], a prior paper by the same three authors. No independent calculation, measurement, or reproduced code for the dark-region density appears here, and the cited result is not machine-checked in the text. Removing that self-citation removes the only stated support for the darker-region branch of the central conclusion, so that branch reduces to the authors' own earlier unshown result. The illuminated-region attenuation calculation is independent and non-circular.

full rationale

The main quantitative derivation is not circular: Eq. (13), ηdust = exp(−n0⟨Cext⟩z), follows from radiative transfer with external optical constants [33], T-matrix cross-sections [26], [28], and the literature density profile Eq. (21) from Popel et al. [30]. No parameter is fitted to the paper's own conclusions, and the Gaussian-beam aperture optimization in Section III.B.3 is textbook optics. The score is 4 rather than 0 because the abstract's recommendation in favor of darker regions relies on the authors' own Ref. [8] for the claim that electrostatic lofting is negligible there; that is a load-bearing self-citation, though the rest of the paper has independent content. Separately, the 15 km numerical examples in Section III.B.1 are inconsistent with the model's own line-of-sight limit Eq. (23) and with the Section III.B.2 caveat that the uniform-density model is valid 'typically a few kilometers at most'; this is a correctness/consistency problem, not a circularity, so it does not increase the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the results rest entirely on literature values for dust density, shape, and refractive index, plus standard scattering and beam propagation models. The free parameters are all inherited from prior measurements or commercial laser specifications, but they are load-bearing because the central attenuation estimate is linearly sensitive to them.

free parameters (4)
  • Dust number density profile coefficients = n0 = -4.166e8 m^-3, h0 = 868 cm
    Taken from a least-squares fit in Popel et al. [30]; the attenuation coefficient is directly proportional to n(h), so errors propagate linearly into the central attenuation result.
  • Particle size range for mean extinction = 0 to 200 nm with uniform unweighted average
    The lofted size distribution is unknown [30]; the paper replaces the integral over r with C_ext evaluated at the mean, which biases the effective cross-section if the real distribution is skewed.
  • Beam quality factor M^2 = 5.9 (BPP = 2 mm.mrad)
    Chosen from commercially available fiber lasers; directly affects the required receiver diameter via Eq. (7) and therefore the aperture sizes shown in the optimization results.
  • Average particle aspect ratio = 1.4286 (c/a)
    Mean aspect ratio from the least-squares fit in Liu et al. [24]; Figure 5 shows the extinction cross-section varies with aspect ratio, so this parameter influences the attenuation magnitude.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Lunar dust particles can be represented as prolate spheroids with average aspect ratio 1.4286
    Based on Liu et al. [24] shape study; the T-matrix cross-section depends on this shape, and Figure 5 shows aspect ratio dependence.
  • domain assumption The complex refractive index of lunar dust is approximated by astronomical silicate (n = 1.733 + 0.05i at 1064 nm)
    The paper assumes the regolith is silicate-rich; actual dust composition varies by region and maturity, which affects absorption and scattering.
  • domain assumption Electrostatic lofting dominates ground-to-ground near-surface dust density; meteoritic ejecta contribution is negligible
    Justified by LADEE/LDEX [34]; this justifies using the electrostatic n(h) profile and excluding dark regions from the analysis.
  • domain assumption The dust density is uniform along the optical path and the surface is flat; the model is only valid for a few kilometers
    The authors state this in the Limitations section, restricting the attenuation model to short transmission distances.
  • standard math Radiative transfer simplifications: far-field, Twersky approximation, ergodicity, statistical independence, uniform distribution, convex medium
    Standard assumptions for low optical thickness, stated in Section II.B.1; necessary for the Beer-Lambert form of Eq. (13).
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian beam propagation with M^2 factor and the 87% capture criterion (R = w_R)
    The choice R = w_R is arbitrary (the paper acknowledges this) and sets the harvested-power scale in Eq. (4); other criteria would change the numbers but not the qualitative conclusions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical Power Beaming in the Lunar Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4AKYJCMX

@misc{pith2026241214083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical Power Beaming in the Lunar Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4AKYJCMX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14083}
}
read the original abstract

The increasing focus on lunar exploration requires innovative power solutions to support scientific research, mining, and habitation in the Moon's extreme environment. Optical power beaming (OPB) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional systems. However, the impact of lofted lunar dust (LLD) on optical transmissions remains poorly understood. This research addresses that gap by evaluating LLD-induced attenuation and optimizing OPB design for efficient power delivery over long distances. A combined theoretical and simulation-based approach is employed, utilizing the T-matrix method to model LLD attenuation and Gaussian beam theory to optimize transmission and receiver parameters. The results indicate that LLD significantly attenuates ground-to-ground optical power transmission in illuminated regions, thus making OPB more suitable in darker areas, such as permanently shadowed regions or during the lunar night. Furthermore, we demonstrate that OPB can operate over long distances on the Moon while maintaining reasonable aperture sizes through appropriate optical design optimizations. These findings highlight the potential of OPB as a reliable power solution for sustainable lunar exploration and habitation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14083 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ground-to-ground OPB on the lunar surface. In the Figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Parameters of beam propagation, based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 3D illustration of particle shape characterization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Averaged extinction cross-section as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Averaged extinction cross-section as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: clearly demonstrates that lunar dust can have a significant impact on transmission efficiency near the surface. Naturally, the greater the transmission distance, the more lunar dust interferes with the laser beam, through absorption and scattering mechanisms. For a rea…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Possible transmitter-receiver range on the Moon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maximum transmission distance as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Lunar dust and dusty plasmas: Recent develop- ments, advances, and unsolved problems,

    S. Popel, L. Zelenyi, A. Golub’, and A. Dubinskii, “Lunar dust and dusty plasmas: Recent develop- ments, advances, and unsolved problems,” Plane- tary and Space Science , vol. 156, pp. 71–84, Jul

    work page

  2. [8]

    Impact of lunar dust on free space optical (fso) energy harvesting,

    M. Naqbi, S. Loranger, and G. Karabulut Kurt, “Impact of lunar dust on free space optical (fso) energy harvesting,” in 2024 IEEE Aerospace Con- ference, IEEE, Mar. 2024, pp. 1–9

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Return to the Moon: New perspectives on lunar exploration,

    Y . Lin, W. Yang, H. Zhang, et al. , “Return to the Moon: New perspectives on lunar exploration,” Science Bulletin , vol. 69, no. 13, pp. 2136–2148, Jul. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.04.051. (visited on 09/24/2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.04.051 2024

  4. [2]

    Lu- nar surface power architecture concepts,

    A. Marcinkowski, L. Carrio, S. Hilliard, et al., “Lu- nar surface power architecture concepts,” in 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar. 2023, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115621. (vis- ited on 09/24/2024)

    arXiv 2023

  5. [3]

    An analysis of power beaming for the moon and mars,

    M. W. Stavnes, “An analysis of power beaming for the moon and mars,” in 27th Intersociety Energy 10 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS VOL. XX, No. XX XXXXX 2022 Conversion Engineering Conference , Aug. 1992. DOI: 10.4271/929436. (visited on 09/24/2024)

    work page doi:10.4271/929436 2022

  6. [4]

    Laser power beaming for defense and security applications,

    T. J. Nugent Jr. and J. T. Kare, “Laser power beaming for defense and security applications,” in SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing , D. W. Gage, C. M. Shoemaker, R. E. Karlsen, and G. R. Gerhart, Eds., Orlando, Florida, United States, May 2011, p. 804 514. DOI: 10.1117/12.886169

    work page doi:10.1117/12.886169 2011

  7. [5]

    De- sign of a modular and orientable electrodynamic shield for lunar dust mitigation,

    M. Tisdale, I. Dul ´a, L. Pabon Madrid, et al., “De- sign of a modular and orientable electrodynamic shield for lunar dust mitigation,” inAIAA SCITECH Forum, 2022, p. 2623

    work page 2022

  8. [6]

    The lunar dust environment: Concerns for moon-based as- tronomy,

    M. Hor ´anyi, J. R. Szalay, and X. Wang, “The lunar dust environment: Concerns for moon-based as- tronomy,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 382, no. 2271, p. 20 230 075, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    Dusty plasma at the moon. challenges of model- ing and measurements,

    L. M. Zelenyi, S. I. Popel, and A. V . Zakharov, “Dusty plasma at the moon. challenges of model- ing and measurements,” Plasma Physics Reports , vol. 46, pp. 527–540, 2020

    2020

  2. [9]

    Impact ejecta and gardening in the lunar polar regions,

    J. R. Szalay, P. Pokorn ´y, Z. Sternovsky, Z. Kupiha, A. R. Poppe, and M. Horanyi, “Impact ejecta and gardening in the lunar polar regions,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 143–154, 2019

    2019

  3. [10]

    Lunar surface: Dust dynamics and regolith mechanics,

    J. E. Colwell, S. Batiste, M. Hor ´anyi, S. Robert- son, and S. Sture, “Lunar surface: Dust dynamics and regolith mechanics,” Reviews of Geophysics , vol. 45, no. 2, 2007

    2007

  4. [11]

    Gaas solar cells for laser power beaming,

    L. C. Olsen, G. Dunham, D. A. Huber, F. W. Addis, N. Anheier, and E. P. Coomes, “Gaas solar cells for laser power beaming,” in NASA. Lewis Research Center, Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference, Aug. 1991

    1991

  5. [12]

    Gaas photovoltaic cells for laser power beaming at high power densities,

    S. Van Riesen, U. Schubert, and A. W. Bett, “Gaas photovoltaic cells for laser power beaming at high power densities,” in Proc. 17th Eur. PV Solar Energy Conf, Oct. 2001, pp. 18–21

    2001

  6. [13]

    High-intensity laser power beaming for long-range wireless power transmission,

    D. E. Raible, “High-intensity laser power beaming for long-range wireless power transmission,” in Proceedings of SPIE , vol. 7005, 2008, 70051F

    2008

  7. [14]

    Lasermotive wins $900,000 from nasa in space elevator games,

    NASA Administrator. “Lasermotive wins $900,000 from nasa in space elevator games,” NASA. (2009), [Online]. Available: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ dryden/status reports/power beam.html

    2009

  8. [15]

    Naval Research Laboratory, Researchers transmit energy with laser in historic power beam- ing demonstration , https : / / www

    U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Researchers transmit energy with laser in historic power beam- ing demonstration , https : / / www . nrl . navy . mil / Media / News / Article / 2504007 / researchers - transmit - energy - with - laser - in - historic - power - beaming-demonstra...

    2019

  9. [16]

    Surveyor observations of lunar horizon-glow,

    J. J. Rennilson and D. R. Criswell, “Surveyor observations of lunar horizon-glow,” The Moon , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 121–142, 1974

    1974

  10. [17]

    J. E. McCoy and D. R. Criswell, Evidence for a high altitude distribution of lunar dust . Pergamon Press, 1974

    1974

  11. [18]

    A per- manent, asymmetric dust cloud around the moon,

    M. Hor ´anyi, J. R. Szalay, S. Kempf, et al., “A per- manent, asymmetric dust cloud around the moon,” Nature, vol. 522, no. 7556, pp. 324–326, 2015

    2015

  12. [19]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Elec- tromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light , 7th ed. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1999. DOI: 10 . 1017 / CBO9781139644181

    1999

  13. [20]

    Defining and Measuring Laser Beam Quality,

    A. E. Siegman, “Defining and Measuring Laser Beam Quality,” en, in Solid State Lasers: New Developments and Applications , M. Inguscio and R. Wallenstein, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 1993, pp. 13–28. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2998- 9 2

    1993 doi

  14. [21]

    Photonics, High power fiber lasers , https://www

    I. Photonics, High power fiber lasers , https://www. ipgphotonics.com/products/lasers/industrial- cw- fiber-lasers/high-power-fiber-lasers, 2024

    2024

  15. [22]

    Focusing of spherical gaussian beams,

    S. A. Self, “Focusing of spherical gaussian beams,” Applied Optics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 658–661, 1983

    1983

  16. [23]

    M. I. Mishchenko, L. D. Travis, A. Lacis, and A. A. Lacis, Multiple scattering of light by particles: radiative transfer and coherent backscattering , 1. publ. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, ISBN : 978-0-521-83490-2

    2006

  17. [24]

    Characterization of lunar dust for toxicologi- cal studies. II: Texture and shape characteristics,

    Y . Liu, J. Park, D. Schnare, E. Hill, and L. A. Tay- lor, “Characterization of lunar dust for toxicologi- cal studies. II: Texture and shape characteristics,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering , vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 272–279, Oct. 2008, ISSN : 0893-1321, 1943-

    2008

  18. [25]

    Mooning over measurement,

    A. C. Debay. “Mooning over measurement,” NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017), [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/ blogs/taking-measure/mooning-over-measurement (visited on 10/03/2024)

    2017

  19. [26]

    M. I. Mishchenko, L. D. Travis, and A. A. Lacis, Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2002, ISBN : 0 521 78252 X. [Online]. Available: http : / / www. giss . nasa . gov /∼crmim / books.html

    2002

  20. [27]

    A T-matrix method and computer code for randomly oriented, axially symmetric coated scatterers,

    A. Quirantes, “A T-matrix method and computer code for randomly oriented, axially symmetric coated scatterers,” Journal of Quantitative Spec- troscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 92, pp. 373– 381, May 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.08.004

    2005 doi

  21. [28]

    Smarties: User-friendly codes for fast and accu- rate calculations of light scattering by spheroids,

    W. R. C. Somerville, B. Augui ´e, and E. C. Le Ru, “Smarties: User-friendly codes for fast and accu- rate calculations of light scattering by spheroids,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 174, pp. 39–55, 2016

    2016

  22. [29]

    A new numerically stable implementation of the T- matrix method for electromagnetic scattering by AUTHOR ET AL.: SHORT ARTICLE TITLE 11 spheroidal particles,

    W. Somerville, B. Augui ´e, and E. Le Ru, “A new numerically stable implementation of the T- matrix method for electromagnetic scattering by AUTHOR ET AL.: SHORT ARTICLE TITLE 11 spheroidal particles,” Journal of Quantitative Spec- troscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 123, pp...

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    Po- larimetry of moonlight: A new method for deter- mining the refractive index of the lunar regolith,

    A. Fearnside, P. Masding, and C. Hooker, “Po- larimetry of moonlight: A new method for deter- mining the refractive index of the lunar regolith,” Icarus, vol. 268, pp. 156–171, Apr. 2016. DOI: 10. 1016/j.icarus.2015.11.038. (visited on 10/05/2023)

    2016

  24. [32]

    A new look at photometry of the moon,

    J. D. Goguen, T. C. Stone, H. H. Kieffer, and B. J. Buratti, “A new look at photometry of the moon,” Icarus, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 548–557, Aug. 2010. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . icarus . 2010 . 03 . 025. (visited on 10/05/2023)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Optical properties of interstellar graphite and silicate grains,

    B. T. Draine and H. M. Lee, “Optical properties of interstellar graphite and silicate grains,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 285, p. 89, Oct. 1984. DOI: 10.1086/162480. (visited on 10/05/2023)

    1984 doi

  26. [34]

    Lunar meteoritic gardening rate derived from in situ LADEE/LDEX measurements,

    J. R. Szalay and M. Hor ´anyi, “Lunar meteoritic gardening rate derived from in situ LADEE/LDEX measurements,” en, Geophysical Research Letters , vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 4893–4898, 2016, ISSN : 1944-

    2016

  27. [35]

    Dusty plasma system in the surface layer of the illuminated part of the moon,

    A. P. Golub’, G. G. Dol’nikov, A. V . Zakharov, et al., “Dusty plasma system in the surface layer of the illuminated part of the moon,” en, JETP Letters, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 182–187, Apr. 2012, ISSN : 1090-

    2012

  28. [36]

    Ingaas metamorphic laser ( λ = 1064 nm) power converters with over 44% efficiency,

    N. A. Kalyuzhnyy, V . M. Emelyanov, S. A. Mintairov, and M. Z. Shvarts, “Ingaas metamorphic laser ( λ = 1064 nm) power converters with over 44% efficiency,” in AIP Conference Proceedings , vol. 2012, AIP Publishing, Sep. 2018

    2012

  29. [37]

    Absorption and scattering by a sphere,

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, “Absorption and scattering by a sphere,” in Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1998, pp. 82–129, ISBN : 978-3- 527-61815-6. DOI: 10.1002/9783527618156.ch4. (visited on 10/05/2023). 12 IEEE TRANSACTION...

    1998 doi

  30. [2018]

    (visited on 09/24/2024)

    DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.010. (visited on 09/24/2024)

    2018 doi

  31. [5525]

    (visited on 10/05/2023)

    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21: 4(272). (visited on 10/05/2023)

    2008 doi

  32. [6487]

    (visited on 09/26/2024)

    DOI: 10.1134/S0021364012040054. (visited on 09/26/2024)

    2024 doi

  33. [8007]

    1002 / 2016GL069148

    DOI: 10 . 1002 / 2016GL069148. (visited on 08/17/2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.