Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Thermal dilepton polarization and dynamics of the QCD plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that measuring the polarization of lepton pairs from the quark-gluon plasma can reveal the plasma's pre-equilibrium stage, which hadronic observables cannot reach.

desk verdict A clean, genuinely new calculation of dilepton polarization with NLO rates; the LO/NLO sign change is robust, but the pre-equilibrium claims outrun the effective-temperature approximation used to estimate them. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15052 v3 pith:6VEVZ6SA submitted 2024-12-19 nucl-th hep-phnucl-ex

Xiang-Yu Wu , Han Gao , Bailey Forster , Charles Gale , Greg Jackson , Sangyong Jeon This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-phnucl-ex
keywords thermaldileptonpolarizationheavy-ioncollisionsquark-gluonplasmanext-to-leading-orderratesphotonspectralfunctionpre-equilibriumstagelambda_thetaPb-Pb5.02TeV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the polarization of lepton pairs emitted by the quark-gluon plasma carries information about the plasma's earliest moments that hadronic observables cannot reach. Using next-to-leading-order thermal rates embedded in a multi-stage simulation of 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb collisions, it predicts that the anisotropy coefficient $\lambda_\theta$ in the intermediate invariant-mass window (about 1 to 3 GeV) changes sign and grows in magnitude when gluon-mediated processes are included, compared with leading-order quark-antiquark annihilation. The same coefficient, plotted against transverse momentum, is predicted to be sensitive to the ratio of gluons to quarks during the pre-equilibrium phase. The paper's central claim is that the measurable angular pattern of dielectrons can serve as a direct probe of thermalization dynamics.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the polarization coefficient $\lambda_\theta$ defined from the angular distribution of the lepton pair in the helicity frame, expressible as $$\lambda_\$\theta$ = \frac{3(\chi - \frac{1}{3})(1-4\xi)\,\rho_\$\Delta$}{\frac{4}{3}(1+2\xi)\,\rho_V - (\chi - \frac{1}{3})(1-4\xi)\,\rho_\$\Delta$},$$ with $\rho_\Delta = \rho_T - \rho_L$ the difference between transverse and longitudinal photon spectral functions and $\chi$ a boost factor encoding the local flow. This identity turns dilepton angular anisotropy into a direct readout of the spectral-function difference, which vanishes in vacuum and is strongly suppressed at large $M/T$. The paper feeds NLO+LPM spectral functions into a multi-stage hydrodynamic simulation, with a pre-equilibrium stage evaluated at an effective temperature, to produce predicted $\lambda_\theta(M)$ and $\lambda_\theta(p_T)$ for 0-20% central Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV.

What would settle it

In central 0-20% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, measure the dielectron angular distribution in the invariant-mass window 1 < M < 3 GeV, extract $\lambda_\theta$ as a function of transverse momentum, and compare with the NLO prediction's sign and rising trend; observing the LO-like near-zero or negative values instead would refute the claim that gluon-mediated processes govern the polarization there.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the polarization anisotropy coefficient $\lambda_\theta$ of thermal dileptons is a qualitatively different observable from the dilepton yield: it depends on the difference $\rho_T - \rho_L$ between the transverse and longitudinal photon spectral functions, not on their sum. In the low-mass limit the virtual photon should behave like a real photon, giving positive $\lambda_\theta$ near 1, but leading-order $q\bar{q}\to\gamma^*$ has vanishing phase space there, so only the next-to-leading-order processes (gluon Compton scattering and modified annihilation, supplemented by Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal resummation) produce the expected behavior. In the intermediate mass window, the authors find that NLO rates shift $\lambda_\theta$ from near zero or negative to clearly positive values, and that its transverse-momentum dependence tracks the gluon-to-quark ratio, making the pre-equilibrium stage visible. The paper presents this as the first NLO-based phenomenological study of dilepton polarization at LHC energies.

Load-bearing premise

The pre-equilibrium contribution is modeled as a thermal plasma at an effective temperature extracted from the pre-equilibrium evolution model, an estimation the authors explicitly label; if that approximation is not quantitatively reliable, the claimed sensitivity of $\lambda_\theta$ to the pre-equilibrium stage is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the low-mass region ($M < 1$ GeV), the NLO prediction gives a sizable positive $\lambda_\theta$, whereas the LO prediction is near zero and negative; a measurement can directly distinguish the two production mechanisms.
  • In the intermediate-mass window (1-3 GeV), the predicted rise of $\lambda_\theta$ with transverse momentum signals a larger gluon-to-quark ratio during pre-equilibrium than in thermal equilibrium.
  • Dilepton polarization reaches information about the pre-equilibrium stage that hadronic observables do not, because the weighted average over the full evolution keeps early-time contributions visible.
  • At high invariant mass ($M > 3$ GeV), QGP dileptons are predicted to be almost unpolarized, consistent with the expectation that Drell-Yan production dominates there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the transverse-momentum dependence of $\lambda_\theta$ in the intermediate mass window could be used to rank different pre-equilibrium models beyond the effective-temperature treatment used here, since each model predicts a different gluon-to-quark ratio at early times.
  • The same polarization observable could be applied to smaller collision systems such as p+Pb or high-multiplicity pp collisions, where the pre-equilibrium phase occupies a larger fraction of the fireball lifetime and the predicted signal would be stronger.
  • A natural experimental next step is to use vertex identification of dilepton decays so that semileptonic charm and beauty decays, which the authors identify as a major background, can be subtracted cleanly enough for the intermediate-mass polarization measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical study of the polarization anisotropy coefficient \lambda_\theta of thermal dileptons in Pb+Pb collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, using next-to-leading-order (NLO) thermal emission rates that include LPM resummation. The emission rates are combined with iEBE-MUSIC hydrodynamic profiles and a K\o{}MP\o{}ST-based description of the pre-equilibrium stage. The authors derive a compact expression for \lambda_\theta in terms of the longitudinal-transverse spectral function difference, compute it as a function of invariant mass and transverse momentum, and report a qualitative sign change from LO to NLO in the low-mass region, with NLO results approaching the real-photon limit as M/T\to 0. They also estimate the pre-equilibrium contribution and conclude that intermediate-mass dileptons probe the thermal equilibration process and the pre-equilibrium gluon-to-quark ratio.

Significance. If the results are robust, the paper introduces a new observable, dilepton polarization, that can discriminate between leading-order quark-antiquark annihilation and NLO gluon-mediated production in the low- and intermediate-mass regions, and that may be sensitive to the pre-equilibrium stage. The derivation of Eq. (7) is transparent, the simulation framework is inherited from a calibrated prior study, and Fig. 1 explicitly demonstrates that the qualitative LO/NLO difference persists for \alpha_s in the range 0.1-0.3, which supports the robustness of that particular claim. The main weakness is the quantitative reliability of the pre-equilibrium contribution, which underlies the abstract's assertion that intermediate-mass dileptons are probes of thermal equilibration.

major comments (1)
  1. [Thermal Dilepton Phenomenology (Fig. 2 caption and following paragraph); Summary] The pre-equilibrium contribution to \lambda_\theta (the curves labeled 'pre-eq.' in Figs. 2 and 3) is computed by evaluating equilibrium thermal spectral functions at an effective temperature extracted from K\o{}MP\o{}ST, as stated in the Fig. 2 caption and the following paragraph. This treatment cannot represent the pre-equilibrium stage's gluon-dominated chemical composition, which controls the relative strength of q\bar{q} annihilation versus gluon Compton channels, nor its momentum-space anisotropy, to which \lambda_\theta is explicitly sensitive (cf. the Introduction's discussion of Ref. [41]). The effective temperature carries only the local energy density and does not fix the quark fugacity or the anisotropy of the momentum distribution; the magnitude and even the sign of the 'pre-eq.' contributions are therefore not controlled by the calculation. Since the abstract's assertion that intermediate-mass dileptons 'indeed probes of the thermal equilibration process' and the Summary's statement that polarization is 'highly sensitive to the preequilibrium evolution' rest on these curves, the quantitative support for those claims is not established. The authors do label the pre-eq result as an 'estimation,' but the conclusions outrun that caveat. This point should be addressed either by a non-equilibrium calculation (e.g., QCD kinetic theory or anisotropic-hydrodynamics-based rates) or by explicitly downgrading the pre-eq curves to illustrative estimates and softening the conclusions accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract's claim of being 'the first theoretical study' should be qualified in light of earlier theoretical work on dilepton polarization in heavy-ion collisions (Refs. [37,39,41]); please clarify what specifically distinguishes the present calculation from those studies.
  2. [Eq. (11)] In Eq. (11), the denominator of the weight function is typeset as '((1+\lambda_\theta(P,T))/3)'; the intended expression is presumably '(1+\lambda_\theta(P,T)/3)', which is dimensionally consistent with the integration over the angular distribution in Eq. (6). Please correct the notation.
  3. [Theoretical Setup (after Fig. 1)] In the sentence after Fig. 1, 'but also in the IMR [59]The rest of our study' is missing a period after '[59]'.
  4. [Thermal Dilepton Phenomenology (Figs. 2 and 3)] The absolute values of \lambda_\theta in Figs. 2 and 3 are presented without uncertainty bands; while the \alpha_s variation is shown in Fig. 1, the adoption of \alpha_s=0.3 and the model calibration should be discussed as sources of theoretical uncertainty.
  5. [Introduction] The notation for the invariant-mass ranges is inconsistent: 'M >∼ 1 GeV', 'M <∼ 1 GeV', and 'M >∼ 3 GeV' appear with inconsistent spacing; please standardize the symbols (e.g., using \gtrsim and \lesssim) throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polarization coefficient is a genuine output of independently anchored spectral functions and calibrated hydrodynamics; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation of lambda_theta is self-contained: Eq. (7) follows from the emission rate in Eq. (1) and the tensor decomposition in Eqs. (3)-(4), and the event-space average in Eq. (11) is an explicit weighted average over fluid cells, not an implicit self-consistency condition. The LO and NLO spectral functions used in Fig. 1 and in the phenomenological curves are taken from published perturbative calculations (Laine 2013; Jackson 2019; Ghisoiu-Laine; Jackson-Laine) and are cross-checked against lattice QCD estimates from the HotQCD Collaboration. These are external, independently checkable inputs; they are not fitted to the polarization observable. The hydrodynamic and pre-equilibrium backgrounds come from the iEBE-MUSIC framework and KMPST with 'the same setup as in Ref. [2]'; although some of these references share authors with the present paper, they are calibrated to hadronic observables and are not fitted to lambda_theta. The pre-equilibrium contribution is explicitly labeled an 'estimation' in the Fig. 2 caption and in the Summary, so it is not being presented as a first-principles prediction. The central LO-versus-NLO comparison is a genuine output of the spectral functions and does not reduce to any fitted parameter or to the definition of lambda_theta. No circular step is present; the self-citations are part of an established research program but are not load-bearing for the paper's central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation has two categories of inputs: perturbative thermal rates with a hand-chosen fixed coupling, and a calibrated hydrodynamic model. Neither is fitted to the polarization observable, so the circularity burden is low. The main model-dependence is the pre-equilibrium effective-temperature treatment and the fixed strong coupling constant.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha_s (strong coupling constant) = 0.3
    Used for the NLO plus LPM rates in the full simulations; Fig. 1 shows sensitivity to 0.1-0.3 only in an approximate estimate, not in the full polarization results.
  • iEBE-MUSIC model calibration parameters (initial conditions, shear viscosity, etc.) = Calibrated to hadronic observables in Ref. [9]
    The temperature and flow profiles that determine the polarization are inherited from the authors' earlier calibrated model setup; these parameters are not refit to dilepton polarization.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local thermal equilibrium in each fluid cell, with temperature T and flow velocity u, so that thermal dilepton rates apply.
    Used throughout the phenomenology; the pre-equilibrium stage is treated with an effective temperature, which the authors flag as an estimation.
  • domain assumption The combined NLO plus LPM resummed spectral functions accurately describe the thermal photon spectral density in the low and intermediate mass ranges.
    Central input for the polarization; the paper relies on prior calculations and compares qualitatively with lattice QCD rather than proving the rates from first principles in this work.
  • domain assumption Baryon chemical potential can be neglected at LHC energies.
    Stated in the phenomenology section; the rates are evaluated at zero baryon density.
  • domain assumption In the intermediate mass range, thermal dileptons dominate the polarization signal; Drell-Yan and heavy-flavor contributions are negligible or can be subtracted with future vertex detectors.
    The paper explicitly sets these processes out of scope, which is necessary for the intermediate-mass claim to be testable.
  • ad hoc to paper The pre-equilibrium phase is modeled by KMPST with an effective temperature, and thermal rates are used during that phase.
    This is an approximation introduced for this study; the authors call the resulting polarization an estimation, so the quantitative result depends on a modeling choice not derived from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal dilepton polarization and dynamics of the QCD plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6VEVZ6SA

@misc{pith2026241215052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal dilepton polarization and dynamics of the QCD plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6VEVZ6SA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15052}
}
abstract

We present the first theoretical study of the polarization of lepton pairs produced in $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC, using next-to-leading order (NLO) dilepton emission rates. These calculations employ a multi-stage framework to simulate the evolution of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, and to explore the sensitivity of polarization to early times. It is found that the intermediate invariant-mass dileptons are indeed probes of the thermal equilibration process, and go beyond the reach of hadronic observables. We compute the polarization anisotropy coefficient obtained with LO dilepton rates, and show that the LO and NLO results differ radically, both in trend and in magnitude, at low and intermediate lepton pair invariant masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15052 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Approximation to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the anisotropy coefficient λθ as a func￾tion of the invariant mass M in the 0%-20% centrality class for Pb+Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV. Notably, in the LMR the inclusion of NLO corrections changes the anisotropy coefficient qualitatively: λθ(M) shifts from a near-zero negative to a sizable positive value after con￾sidering the NLO correction (this feature is also evident in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The anisotropy coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermal Dilepton Polarization under Rotation or Magnetic Field in Heavy-ion Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Vorticity and magnetic fields induce characteristically different dilepton polarization spectra via modified quark propagators, with λ_θ decreasing monotonically under rotation but oscillating under magnetic fields du...

  2. Spin alignment of Quarkonia: A Possible Probe of Deconfined QCD matter in Pb+Pb Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV

    hep-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quarkonium spin alignment in heavy-ion collisions is predicted to increase with medium vorticity, but the model conflicts with current ALICE data at low transverse momentum.

  3. Thermal dilepton production within conformal viscous Gubser flow

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Thermal dilepton yields and effective temperatures are computed for conformal viscous Gubser flow, showing larger yields for lower q (larger systems) and higher effective temperatures for smaller systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [41]

    Dilepton Polariza- tion as a Signature of Plasma Anisotropy,

    Maurice Coquet, Michael Winn, Xiaojian Du, Jean-Yves Ollitrault, and Soeren Schlichting, “Dilepton Polariza- tion as a Signature of Plasma Anisotropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 232301 (2024), arXiv:2309.00555 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    The exploration of hot nuclear matter,

    Barbara V. Jacak and Berndt Muller, “The exploration of hot nuclear matter,” Science337, 310–314 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    Multimessenger heavy-ion colli- sion physics,

    Charles Gale, Jean-Fran¸ cois Paquet, Bj¨ orn Schenke, and Chun Shen, “Multimessenger heavy-ion colli- sion physics,” Phys. Rev. C105, 014909 (2022), arXiv:2106.11216 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [3]

    Production of photons in relativis- tic heavy-ion collisions,

    Jean-Fran¸ cois Paquet, Chun Shen, Gabriel S. Deni- col, Matthew Luzum, Bj¨ orn Schenke, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale, “Production of photons in relativis- tic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev.C93, 044906 (2016), arXiv:1509.06738 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Ther- mal Photons and Collective Flow at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider,

    Hendrik van Hees, Charles Gale, and Ralf Rapp, “Ther- mal Photons and Collective Flow at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider,” Phys. Rev. C84, 054906 (2011), arXiv:1108.2131 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2011

  6. [5]

    Electromagnetic ra- diation from relativistic nuclear collisions,

    Charles Gale and Kevin L. Haglin, “Electromagnetic ra- diation from relativistic nuclear collisions,” , 364–429 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306098

    arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Dilepton radiation from high temperature nuclear matter,

    Charles Gale and Joseph I. Kapusta, “Dilepton radiation from high temperature nuclear matter,” Phys. Rev. C35, 2107–2116 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [7]

    Dilepton Radiation at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron,

    Hendrik van Hees and Ralf Rapp, “Dilepton Radiation at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron,” Nucl. Phys. A 806, 339–387 (2008), arXiv:0711.3444 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Electric Conductivity of QCD Matter and Dilepton Spectra in Heavy-Ion Collisions,

    Ralf Rapp, “Electric Conductivity of QCD Matter and Dilepton Spectra in Heavy-Ion Collisions,” (2024), arXiv:2406.14656 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Probing the equilibration of the QCD matter cre- ated in heavy-ion collisions with dileptons,

    Xiang-Yu Wu, Lipei Du, Charles Gale, and Sangyong Jeon, “Probing the equilibration of the QCD matter cre- ated in heavy-ion collisions with dileptons,” Phys. Rev. C110, 054904 (2024), arXiv:2407.04156 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Scaling of pre-equilibrium dilepton produc- tion in QCD Kinetic Theory,

    Oscar Garcia-Montero, Philip Plaschke, and S¨ oren Schlichting, “Scaling of pre-equilibrium dilepton produc- tion in QCD Kinetic Theory,” (2024), arXiv:2403.04846 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Intermedi- ate mass dileptons as pre-equilibrium probes in heavy ion collisions,

    Maurice Coquet, Xiaojian Du, Jean-Yves Ollitrault, Soeren Schlichting, and Michael Winn, “Intermedi- ate mass dileptons as pre-equilibrium probes in heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B821, 136626 (2021), arXiv:2104.07622 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Ellipticity of photon emission from strongly magnetized hot QCD plasma,

    Xinyang Wang, Igor A. Shovkovy, Lang Yu, and Mei Huang, “Ellipticity of photon emission from strongly magnetized hot QCD plasma,” Phys. Rev. D102, 076010 (2020), arXiv:2006.16254 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Photon polarization tensor in a magnetized plasma: Absorptive part,

    Xinyang Wang and Igor Shovkovy, “Photon polarization tensor in a magnetized plasma: Absorptive part,” Phys. Rev. D104, 056017 (2021), arXiv:2103.01967 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Rate and el- lipticity of dilepton production in a magnetized quark- gluon plasma,

    Xinyang Wang and Igor A. Shovkovy, “Rate and el- lipticity of dilepton production in a magnetized quark- gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. D106, 036014 (2022), arXiv:2205.00276 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Estimate of vir- tual photon polarization due to the intense magnetic field in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energies,

    Kento Kimura, Nicholas J. Benoit, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Chiho Nonaka, and Kenta Shigaki, “Estimate of vir- tual photon polarization due to the intense magnetic field in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energies,” (2024), arXiv:2411.01406 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    NA60 results on ther- mal dimuons,

    R. Arnaldiet al.(NA60), “NA60 results on ther- mal dimuons,” Eur. Phys. J. C61, 711–720 (2009), arXiv:0812.3053 [nucl-ex]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Virtual Photons Shed Light on the Early Temperature of Dense QCD Matter,

    Jessica Churchill, Lipei Du, Charles Gale, Greg Jackson, and Sangyong Jeon, “Virtual Photons Shed Light on the Early Temperature of Dense QCD Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 172301 (2024), arXiv:2311.06951 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant- mass observables,

    Jessica Churchill, Lipei Du, Charles Gale, Greg Jackson, and Sangyong Jeon, “Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant- mass observables,” Phys. Rev. C109, 044915 (2024), arXiv:2311.06675 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Dielectron produc- tion in central Pb−Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,

    Shreyasi Acharyaet al.(ALICE), “Dielectron produc- tion in central Pb−Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,” (2023), arXiv:2308.16704 [nucl-ex]

    2023

  13. [20]

    Measurements of di- electron production in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment,

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), “Measurements of di- electron production in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment,” Phys. Rev. C107, L061901 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Measurements of Dielec- tron Production in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV from the STAR Experiment,

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), “Measurements of Dielec- tron Production in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV from the STAR Experiment,” Phys. Rev. C92, 024912 (2015), arXiv:1504.01317 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Temperature Measurement of Quark-Gluon Plasma at Different Stages,

    “Temperature Measurement of Quark-Gluon Plasma at Different Stages,” (2024), arXiv:2402.01998 [nucl-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Evidence for the production of thermal-like muon pairs with masses above 1 GeV/c 2 in 158AGeV Indium-Indium Collisions,

    R Arnaldiet al.(NA60), “Evidence for the production of thermal-like muon pairs with masses above 1 GeV/c 2 in 158AGeV Indium-Indium Collisions,” Eur. Phys. J. C 59, 607–623 (2009), arXiv:0810.3204 [nucl-ex]

    2009 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies,

    Ralf Rapp, “Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2013, 148253 (2013), arXiv:1304.2309 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [25]

    This channel is also included in the Drell-Yan process where initial quarks are sourced from the nPDFs of the colliding ions

  19. [26]

    NLO thermal dilepton rate at non-zero mo- mentum,

    M. Laine, “NLO thermal dilepton rate at non-zero mo- mentum,” JHEP11, 120 (2013), arXiv:1310.0164 [hep- ph]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Two-loop thermal spectral functions with general kinematics,

    G. Jackson, “Two-loop thermal spectral functions with general kinematics,” Phys. Rev. D100, 116019 (2019), arXiv:1910.07552 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Photon emission from ultrarelativistic plasmas,

    Peter Brockway Arnold, Guy D. Moore, and Laurence G. Yaffe, “Photon emission from ultrarelativistic plasmas,” JHEP11, 057 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0109064

    2001 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Photon emission from quark gluon 6 plasma: Complete leading order results,

    Peter Brockway Arnold, Guy D. Moore, and Lau- rence G. Yaffe, “Photon emission from quark gluon 6 plasma: Complete leading order results,” JHEP12, 009 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0111107 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Enhanced ther- mal production of hard dileptons by 3→2 processes,

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, and H. Zaraket, “Enhanced ther- mal production of hard dileptons by 3→2 processes,” JHEP07, 063 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0204145

    2002 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal resummation for dilep- ton production,

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, G. D. Moore, and H. Zaraket, “Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal resummation for dilep- ton production,” JHEP12, 006 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0211036 [hep-ph]

    2002

  25. [32]

    Interpolation of hard and soft dilepton rates,

    I. Ghisoiu and M. Laine, “Interpolation of hard and soft dilepton rates,” JHEP10, 083 (2014), arXiv:1407.7955 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Testing thermal photon and dilepton rates,

    G. Jackson and M. Laine, “Testing thermal photon and dilepton rates,” JHEP11, 144 (2019), arXiv:1910.09567 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Smooth interpolation be- tween thermal Born and LPM rates,

    J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, “Smooth interpolation be- tween thermal Born and LPM rates,” JHEP01, 173 (2022), arXiv:2110.07149 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    NLO contribu- tions

    From this point on, we consider the “NLO contribu- tions” to include the LPM resummation for smallMas in Refs. [32, 33]

  29. [36]

    Ther- mal dilepton production in heavy-ion collisions at beam- energy-scan (BES) energies,

    Jessica Churchill, Lipei Du, Bailey Forster, Han Gao, Greg Jackson, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale, “Ther- mal dilepton production in heavy-ion collisions at beam- energy-scan (BES) energies,” EPJ Web Conf.296, 07006 (2024), arXiv:2312.10166 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions,

    Enrico Speranza, Amaresh Jaiswal, and Bengt Friman, “Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 782, 395–400 (2018), arXiv:1802.02479 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Weak magnetic field effect on dilepton polarization in heavy-ion collisions,

    Minghua Wei and Li Yan, “Weak magnetic field effect on dilepton polarization in heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. D110, 054024 (2024), arXiv:2406.10041 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Polarization of Thermal Dilepton Radia- tion,

    Florian Seck, Bengt Friman, Tetyana Galatyuk, Hen- drik van Hees, Enrico Speranza, Ralf Rapp, and Jochen Wambach, “Polarization of Thermal Dilepton Radia- tion,” (2023), arXiv:2309.03189 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Also the centre-of-mass frame of the dilepton

  34. [42]

    Polarized photons from the early stages of relativistic heavy- ion collisions,

    Sigtryggur Hauksson and Charles Gale, “Polarized photons from the early stages of relativistic heavy- ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C109, 034902 (2024), arXiv:2306.10307 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The temperature is defined in the fluid rest frame

  36. [44]

    Kapusta and Charles Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    Joseph I. Kapusta and Charles Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    Mikko Laine and Aleksi Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, Vol. 925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma,

    H. Arthur Weldon, “Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma,” Phys. Rev. D 26, 1394 (1982)

    1982

  39. [47]

    Transport Properties of the Quark- Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective,

    Harvey B. Meyer, “Transport Properties of the Quark- Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective,” Eur. Phys. J. A47, 86 (2011), arXiv:1104.3708 [hep-lat]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Lattice constraints on the thermal photon rate,

    J. Ghiglieri, O. Kaczmarek, M. Laine, and F. Meyer, “Lattice constraints on the thermal photon rate,” Phys. Rev. D94, 016005 (2016), arXiv:1604.07544 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    An estimate for the thermal photon rate from lattice QCD,

    Bastian B. Brandt, Anthony Francis, Tim Harris, Har- vey B. Meyer, and Aman Steinberg, “An estimate for the thermal photon rate from lattice QCD,” EPJ Web Conf.175, 07044 (2018), arXiv:1710.07050 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Photon emissivity of the quark-gluon plasma: A lattice QCD analysis of the transverse chan- nel,

    Marco C` e, Tim Harris, Ardit Krasniqi, Harvey B. Meyer, and Csaba T¨ or¨ ok, “Photon emissivity of the quark-gluon plasma: A lattice QCD analysis of the transverse chan- nel,” Phys. Rev. D106, 054501 (2022), arXiv:2205.02821 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Photon and dilepton produc- tion rate in the quark-gluon plasma from lattice QCD,

    Harvey B. Meyer, Marco C` e, Tim Harris, Ardit Kras- niqia, and Csaba T¨ or¨ ok, “Photon and dilepton produc- tion rate in the quark-gluon plasma from lattice QCD,” PoSLA TTICE2022, 186 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Lattice QCD estimates of thermal photon production from the QGP,

    Sajid Ali, Dibyendu Bala, Anthony Francis, Greg Jack- son, Olaf Kaczmarek, Jonas Turnwald, Tristan Ueding, and Nicolas Wink (HotQCD), “Lattice QCD estimates of thermal photon production from the QGP,” Phys. Rev. D110, 054518 (2024), arXiv:2403.11647 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD,

    A. Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), “Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD,” Phys. Rev. D90, 094503 (2014), arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Although these results were at a pion massm π ≃ 320 MeV and not continuum extrapolated, the lattice was quite large withN s = 96 anda≃7 GeV −1

  47. [55]

    Shedding light on thermal photon and dilepton production,

    Greg Jackson, “Shedding light on thermal photon and dilepton production,” EPJ Web Conf.274, 05014 (2022), arXiv:2211.09575 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization,

    Pietro Faccioli, Carlos Lourenco, Joao Seixas, and Her- mine K. Wohri, “Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization,” Eur. Phys. J. C69, 657–673 (2010), arXiv:1006.2738 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Asymptotics of thermal spectral func- tions,

    S. Caron-Huot, “Asymptotics of thermal spectral func- tions,” Phys. Rev. D79, 125009 (2009), arXiv:0903.3958 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ul- traviolet asymptotics of scalar and pseudoscalar corre- lators in hot Yang-Mills theory,

    Laine, M. and Veps¨ al¨ ainen, M. and Vuorinen, A., “Ul- traviolet asymptotics of scalar and pseudoscalar corre- lators in hot Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP10, 010 (2010), arXiv:1008.3263 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Note that calculations to NNLO and beyond need to re- spect the fact thatρ L = 0 forM→0, andρ T =ρ L for M→ ∞

  52. [60]

    Hot QCD White Paper,

    M. Arslandoket al., “Hot QCD White Paper,” (2023), arXiv:2303.17254 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    (3+1)D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy- ion collisions,

    Schenke, Bj¨ orn and Jeon, Sangyong and Gale, Charles, “(3+1)D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy- ion collisions,” Phys. Rev.C82, 014903 (2010), arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Ellip- tic and triangular flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamics,

    Bj¨ orn Schenke, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale, “Ellip- tic and triangular flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 042301 (2011), arXiv:1009.3244 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Thermal Dileptons at LHC,

    H. van Hees and R. Rapp, “Thermal Dileptons at LHC,” J. Phys. G35, 054001.153 (2008), arXiv:0706.4443 [hep- ph]

    2008 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Dilepton emission in high-energy heavy-ion collisions with viscous hydrodynamics,

    Vujanovic, Gojko and Young, Clint and Schenke, Bj¨ orn and Rapp, Ralf and Jeon, Sangyong and Gale, Charles, “Dilepton emission in high-energy heavy-ion collisions with viscous hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. C89, 034904 (2014), arXiv:1312.0676 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.