Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Islands, Double Holography, and the Entanglement Membrane

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that, in a double-holographic model of an eternal black hole coupled to baths, the late-time Page curve is quantitatively the entanglement-membrane Page curve of a chaotic many-body system.

desk verdict Probe-brane membrane derivation of the Page curve is clean and new; the generic-θ extension is an openly flagged scaling argument that needs a quantitative check. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15070 v1 pith:LJL5TFD6 submitted 2024-12-19 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elgr-qcquant-ph

Hanzhi Jiang , Mike Blake , Anthony P. Thompson This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elgr-qcquant-ph
keywords entanglementmembranedoubleholographyPagecurvequantumextremalislandsHawkingradiationAdS/BCFTPlanckbraneentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a semi-classical gravity computation of the Page curve and a coarse-grained chaotic many-body computation are the same calculation, not merely analogous ones. The arena is a double-holographic model: an eternal two-sided AdS$_d$ black hole with $d>2$, each side coupled to a flat non-gravitating bath, so that the quantum extremal island rule is geometrized by ordinary extremal surfaces in one higher dimension. In the late-time, large-subregion limit those extremal surfaces project to entanglement membranes and give $S(R)=2s_{\rm th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)\min(v_E t,b)$, with Page time $t_P=b/v_E$. The paper then shows that this is the Page curve of the Blake-Thompson entanglement-membrane model, thereby making the gravity-vs-quantum-chaos correspondence quantitative.

What carries the argument

The central object is the entanglement membrane, a coarse-grained surface whose minimal action computes the time-dependent entanglement entropy. The load-bearing mechanism is double holography followed by projection: the quantum extremal island rule in $d$ dimensions is converted into ordinary HRT surfaces in an AdS$_{d+1}$ bulk, and those surfaces are projected along constant infalling time onto the boundary, which in the large-subregion scaling limit yields the membrane action with tension $E(v)$ fixed by the black-brane geometry. The identity that carries the argument is the Page curve $S(R)=2s_{\rm th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)\min(v_E t,b)$, realized by the competition between a $v=0$ membrane (entanglement growth at speed $v_E$) and two $\pm v_B$ membranes exiting through the boundary (saturation at the coarse-grained entropy).

What would settle it

Compute the exact island HRT surface in the backreacted $\theta<\pi/2$ geometry (for instance from the numerical $d=4$ solution) at $b\gg\Gamma$, project it along constant infalling time, and compare the projection with the $\pm v_B$ lines and the area with $2s_{\rm th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)b$ at leading order in the large-$b$ scaling. Any order-$\Lambda$ difference would restrict the membrane equivalence to the tensionless probe brane.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Page curve in a double-holographic black hole model is exactly the curve of membrane theory. The Hartman-Maldacena surface, which grows linearly in time through the black hole interior, projects along constant infalling time to a $v=0$ membrane; the static island surfaces that end on the Planck brane project to two membranes of slope $\pm v_B$ that exit through the $x=0$ boundary. Minimizing between these two configurations gives $S(R)=2s_{\rm th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)\min(v_E t,b)$, with $t_P=b/v_E$. This is the same Page curve that was obtained for two chaotic systems each coupled to a bath in the Blake-Thompson model, and the paper gives the dictionary between the two models: equal entropy densities and a reservoir backed off by a distance $b$ from the boundary. For the tensionless probe brane the geometry is exact; for general $\theta<\pi/2$ the paper argues that brane backreaction shifts the extremal surfaces only at subleading order when $b$ is large, so the membrane description survives.

Load-bearing premise

For $\theta<\pi/2$, the argument assumes that when the reservoir is very large compared with the backreaction scale of the brane, the brane changes the island surfaces only by order-one amounts, so their leading-order projections and areas match the tensionless probe-brane case; the paper does not compute the extended boundary location and relies on this expectation rather than a proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Page time in this setup is exactly $t_P=b/v_E$: for a given reservoir size $b$, the crossover from linear growth to saturation is controlled by the entanglement velocity of the dual field theory.
  • The saturated entropy is $2s_{\rm th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)b$, which is the coarse-grained entropy of the gravitating system including the large piece of bath; this makes the saturation value a geometric quantity.
  • The Planck brane acts as a boundary through which saturated membranes can exit, giving a concrete realization of the membrane-theory saturation mechanism in a gravitational setting.
  • In $d>2$ the ordinary, non-degenerate membrane theory applies, so the double-holographic Page curve is captured by the standard membrane action rather than the generalized 2d CFT version.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension: if the $\theta<\pi/2$ claim holds, the membrane tension $E(v)$ in this whole family of models is determined by the far-from-brane AdS$_{d+1}$-Schwarzschild region alone; computing $E(v)$ from the exact backreacted metric should show no order-$\Lambda$ dependence on the brane angle.
  • The dictionary with the Blake-Thompson model suggests a general rule for double holography: endpoints of HRT surfaces on a codimension-one brane appear as membrane endpoints on an effective boundary, so the brane tension and profile control only subleading data such as the endpoint location.
  • The joining-quench result in the appendix indicates a concrete next step: once the brane profile for an evaporating black hole is known, the same projection should yield the full evaporating Page curve in $d>2$, extending the equivalence beyond eternal black holes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a derivation of entanglement membrane theory from a double-holographic model of an eternal two-sided asymptotically AdS_d (d>2) black hole coupled to flat d-dimensional baths. In the probe-brane limit θ=π/2, where the bulk is exactly planar AdS_{d+1}-Schwarzschild, the authors show that the Hartman-Maldacena surface projects to a v=0 membrane and the island surfaces project to ±v_B membranes exiting through the x=0 boundary, yielding the Page curve (4.4) with Page time t_P=b/v_E. For generic θ<π/2 they argue the same membrane description holds to O(Λ) when b≫Γ, where Γ is the backreaction length scale, because the brane backreaction and the unknown extension boundary x_b are O(1) effects. They compare the resulting membrane picture to the Blake-Thompson random-circuit model and obtain a matching dictionary. An appendix applies joining-quench membrane theory to evaporating black holes before the Page time.

Significance. If the central derivation is accepted, the paper provides a concrete and economical bridge between semiclassical island calculations and the modern entanglement-membrane framework: the membrane parameters v_E and v_B are not fitted but inherited from holographic membrane theory, and the saturated membrane configuration realizes the finite-system 'exit through boundary' mechanism. The probe-brane calculation is clean and largely analytic, and the paper is honest about the heuristic nature of the generic-θ extension. The main value is as a proof of principle that double holography can be projected into membrane language, and as a useful dictionary for future comparisons. However, the abstract's unqualified d>2 claim is stronger than what is actually established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, footnote 20] The extension from the exactly solvable θ=π/2 probe-brane limit to generic θ<π/2 is load-bearing for the abstract and the concluding claim, but it is not established. The text asserts that for b≫Γ the backreaction of the Planck brane and the unknown extended boundary x_b are O(1) effects, so that the island surfaces and the HM surface are unchanged to O(Λ). However, x_b is never computed, Γ is not defined quantitatively, and footnote 20 explicitly relies on belief rather than proof for the O(1) nature of the differences within the continuous family of extremal surfaces. Because no analytic metric for θ<π/2 is known (only the d=4 numerical solution of [33]), the statement that the membrane theory and the Page curve (4.4) hold for generic θ is an unproven assertion. This should be either proved/quantified using the numerical metric or removed from the abstract and conclusion by restricting the central claim to the tensionless probe-brane case.
  2. [§4.2, HM surface paragraph] The same missing control affects the claim that before the Page time the HM surface is unaffected by the brane backreaction to O(Λ). The sentence 'the HM surface will be located in regions where the (d+1)-dimensional bulk geometry is well approximated by the AdS_{d+1}-Schwarzschild black hole' is plausible but unquantified; no argument shows that the portion of the surface near the brane contributes at most O(1) to the area or that the projected membrane endpoint is not shifted by an O(Λ) amount. Since the membrane projection is itself only valid to O(Λ) in the scaling limit (2.4), an O(1) ambiguity in the brane region is not obviously harmless. A quantitative estimate from the numerical solution of [33], or a restriction of the claim to the probe-brane limit, is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4.6)] The relation between the reservoir distance b and the QES location a appears to have a wrong coefficient. From (2.12) and the definition v_B = sqrt(-f'(1)/(2(d-1))), one obtains b ~ -log(1-a)/(2(d-1)v_B), hence a ≈ 1 - exp[-2(d-1)v_B b], not 1 - exp[-d v_B b] as written. The two expressions differ for all d>2; please check and correct.
  2. [§4.2] The length scale Γ is introduced only as 'the distance scale over which the backreaction of the brane has a significant effect on the geometry'. Since the condition b≫Γ is essential to the argument, Γ should be defined in terms of the brane angle θ, the horizon radius, and the black-hole parameters, or at least estimated for the numerical solution of [33].
  3. [Throughout] There are a number of typos and minor wording issues: 'As such the the portion of island surfaces' in §4.2; 'generalisating' in §1; 'forevaporating' in §5; 'fine-graned' in §5. These should be corrected in a final pass.
  4. [§4.3, abstract] The word 'equivalence' in the abstract may overstate what is shown, because the membrane tension and velocities are inherited from the holographic membrane theory and the match to Blake-Thompson is made by identifying S_BH = s_th b after the fact. I suggest saying 'correspondence' or explicitly describing the dictionary.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The gravity-side membrane derivation is self-contained; the match to the Blake–Thompson many-body model is a parameter dictionary set up by modifying that model, so the only circularity is confined to the claimed equivalence, not to the core Page-curve calculation.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.3, 'Relation to the Blake-Thompson Model', around Eq. (4.8)]
    "To modify the Blake-Thompson model to our model, one can either let R and B be the same chaotic many-body system by setting ˜sth = sth, or discard B and back off the reservoir a distance b from the x = 0 boundary. Afterward, one can glue the two-sided setup along the u = 0 slice, as in Figure 2. The resulting membrane theory is depicted in Figure 9."

    The advertised 'quantitative equivalence' is exhibited by altering the Blake-Thompson model [47], a prior paper by two of the present authors, so that its membrane configuration coincides with the double-holography one. With \tilde{s}_{th}=s_{th} and the black-hole region replaced by a boundary offset b, the saturation value 2S_BH=2\tilde{s}_{th}\alpha in Eq. (4.8) becomes 2s_{th}\mathrm{vol}(\partial A)b, making Eq. (4.8) identical to Eq. (4.4) and the Page times t_P=S_BH/(s_{th}v_E) and t_P=b/v_E equal by construction. This is a parameter dictionary rather than an independent prediction; the gravity-side Page-curve derivation in Section 4.1 does not rely on this identification.

full rationale

The core derivation of the Page curve from double holography is self-contained: the Hartman-Maldacena surface is projected to a v=0 membrane and the island surfaces to ±v_B lines, with the v_B projection re-derived in Section 2 from Eqs. (2.11)-(2.13) rather than merely imported from [56]. The membrane tension E(v), v_E, and v_B are taken from prior independent holographic membrane theory [54,56], with [56] coauthored by one of the present authors but used only for a fact also derived in the text. Section 4.2's extension to θ<π/2 rests on the unquantified O(1)-backreaction assumption and footnote 20's 'We believe', which is a correctness risk or missing proof, not circularity. The only concrete by-construction matching is the Blake–Thompson comparison in Section 4.3, where parameters are identified after the fact to make the two Page curves coincide. Because that identification does not feed back into the gravity calculation, the overall circularity is minor and non-load-bearing, giving score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; b and theta are model parameters with specified limits. The calculation rests on standard holographic frameworks and on two explicit ad hoc assumptions about O(1) subleading effects in the backreacted brane geometry. The invented_entities list is empty because the paper introduces no new physical entities, only the bookkeeping construct of an extended boundary, which is treated as subleading.

free parameters (2)
  • Reservoir distance b = Lambda b with Lambda >> 1
    Physical scale set by the reservoir placement; taken to be large so island surfaces enter the membrane scaling regime. Not fitted to data.
  • Brane angle theta = theta = pi/2 or theta < pi/2
    Boundary condition of the AdS/BCFT construction; the main derivation is at theta = pi/2 and the generalization assumes backreaction is subleading for theta < pi/2.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The HRT/QES prescription computes entanglement entropy and Page curves in semiclassical gravity.
    Invoked in Section 3 (eq. 3.1) and Section 4 to identify entropy of radiation with extremal surfaces.
  • domain assumption The double-holographic AdS/BCFT construction with Neumann junction condition (3.3) geometrizes the quantum extremal island rule to ordinary HRT surfaces.
    Section 3, equations (3.2)-(3.3), following [33,35,66,67].
  • domain assumption For d>2 with theta < pi/2, a backreacted brane solution exists and asymptotes to planar AdS_{d+1}-Schwarzschild away from the brane.
    Section 3, citing [33]; used in Section 4.2 to replace the actual metric by (3.5) at O(Lambda).
  • domain assumption In the scaling limit (2.4), the HRT surface's radial dynamics decouples and the area functional reduces to the membrane action with tension E(v).
    Section 2, equations (2.3)-(2.6), from [54].
  • ad hoc to paper For theta < pi/2 and b >> Gamma, brane backreaction and the unknown extended boundary x_b are O(1) effects, so island surfaces match the probe brane case at O(Lambda).
    Section 4.2: 'these are O(1) effects that are subleading in large b limit', no estimate from the numerical metric is given.
  • ad hoc to paper The continuous family of island extremal surfaces found in [33] has O(1) differences in area, so all give entropy (4.3) to O(Lambda).
    Footnote 20: 'We believe that in the large b limit ... the difference among this family ... is an O(1) effect'.
  • domain assumption For evaporating black holes before the Page time, the d>2 joining quench is qualitatively the same as the JT case and is described by the Cardy-brane membrane theory of [55].
    Appendix A, first paragraph; the authors state expectation and use the AdS-Schwarzschild membrane tension heuristically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Islands, Double Holography, and the Entanglement Membrane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LJL5TFD6

@misc{pith2026241215070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Islands, Double Holography, and the Entanglement Membrane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LJL5TFD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15070}
}
abstract

The quantum extremal island rule allows us to compute the Page curves of Hawking radiation in semi-classical gravity. In this work, we study the connection between these calculations and the thermalisation of chaotic quantum many-body systems, using a coarse-grained description of entanglement dynamics known as the entanglement membrane. Starting from a double-holographic model of eternal two-sided asymptotically AdS$_d$ ($d>2$) black hole each coupled to a flat $d$-dimensional bath, we show that the entanglement dynamics in the late-time, large-subregion limit is described by entanglement membrane, thereby establishing a quantitative equivalence between a semi-classical gravity and a chaotic quantum many-body system calculation of the Page curve.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions , SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [ 1911.09666]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [35]

    Geng and A

    H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands , JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [ 2006.02438]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [47]

    The Page curve from the entanglement membrane

    M. Blake and A.P. Thompson, The Page curve from the entanglement membrane , JHEP 11 (2023) 016 [ 2306.13140]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [54]

    Mezei, Membrane theory of entanglement dynamics from holography , Phys

    M. Mezei, Membrane theory of entanglement dynamics from holography , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 106025 [ 1803.10244]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [1]

    Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun

    S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

    1975

  6. [2]

    Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse , Phys

    S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460

    work page 1976

  7. [3]

    Page, Average entropy of a subsystem , Phys

    D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [ gr-qc/9305007]

    arXiv 1993

  8. [4]

    Page, Information in black hole radiation , Phys

    D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083]

    arXiv 1993

Show all 76 references
  1. [5]

    Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [6]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [7]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [8]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [9]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [10]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [ 0705.0016]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [11]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [ 1307.2892]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [12]

    Engelhardt and A.C

    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime , JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [ 1408.3203]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [13]

    Czech, J.L

    B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [ 1204.1330]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [14]

    Headrick, V.E

    M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 (2014) 162 [ 1408.6300]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [15]

    Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class

    A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [ 1211.3494]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [16]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [ 1411.7041]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [17]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [ 1601.05416]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [18]

    Jafferis, A

    D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [ 1512.06431]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [19]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels , Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031011 [ 1704.05839]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [20]

    Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]

    G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]. – 22 –

    2020 arXiv

  17. [21]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole , JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [ 1905.08762]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [22]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [ 1908.10996]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [23]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064]

    1999 arXiv

  20. [24]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [ hep-th/0011156]

    2001 arXiv

  21. [25]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes , Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [ 1306.0533]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [26]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon , 1910.11077

    1910 arXiv

  23. [27]

    Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity , Nucl

    R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343

    1985

  24. [28]

    Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions , Phys

    C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41

    1983

  25. [29]

    Almheiri and J

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014 [1402.6334]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [30]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space , PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [ 1606.01857]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [31]

    Engels¨ oy, T.G

    J. Engels¨ oy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139 [ 1606.03438]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [32]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory , J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [ hep-th/0405152]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Hartman and J

    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [ 1303.1080]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [36]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath , SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 103 [ 2012.04671]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [37]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity , JHEP 01 (2022) 182 [ 2107.03390]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [38]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Entanglement phase structure of a holographic BCFT in a black hole background , JHEP 05 (2022) 153 [2112.09132]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system , Phys

    J.M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system , Phys. Rev. A 43 (1991) 2046

    1991

  34. [40]

    Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , Phys. Rev. E 50 (1994) [cond-mat/9403051]

    1994 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems , Nature 452 (2008) 854 [ 0708.1324]

    2008 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Shenker and D

    S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect , JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [1306.0622]. – 23 –

    2014 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Maldacena, S.H

    J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos , JHEP 08 (2016) 106 [1503.01409]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Vardhan, Void Formation in Operator Growth, Entanglement, and Unitarity , JHEP 03 (2021) 159 [ 1912.08918]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Vardhan, A dynamical mechanism for the Page curve from quantum chaos , JHEP 03 (2021) 088 [ 2002.05734]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [46]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hollander and A. Rolph, Page curves and replica wormholes from random dynamics, JHEP 07 (2024) 023 [ 2311.07655]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Jonay, D.A

    C. Jonay, D.A. Huse and A. Nahum, Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement, 1803.00089

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay and J. Haah, Quantum Entanglement Growth Under Random Unitary Dynamics , Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 031016 [ 1608.06950]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 174205 [ 1804.09737]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Entanglement Membrane in Chaotic Many-Body Systems , Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) 031066 [ 1912.12311]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Rampp, S.A

    M.A. Rampp, S.A. Rather and P.W. Claeys, Entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 033271 [ 2312.12509]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Vardhan and S

    S. Vardhan and S. Moudgalya, Entanglement dynamics from universal low-lying modes , 2407.16763

  47. [55]

    Mezei and J

    M. Mezei and J. Virrueta, Exploring the Membrane Theory of Entanglement Dynamics , JHEP 02 (2020) 013 [ 1912.11024]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Jiang, M

    H. Jiang, M. Mezei and J. Virrueta, The entanglement membrane in 2d CFT: reflected entropy, RG flow, and information velocity , 2411.16542

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Liu and S.J

    H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 011601 [ 1305.7244]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Liu and S.J

    H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement growth during thermalization in holographic systems , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066012 [ 1311.1200]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Roberts, D

    D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051 [1409.8180]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Mezei, On entanglement spreading from holography , JHEP 05 (2017) 064 [ 1612.00082]

    M. Mezei, On entanglement spreading from holography , JHEP 05 (2017) 064 [ 1612.00082]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos and T. Prosen, Entanglement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many-body quantum chaos , Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 021033 [ 1812.05090]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J.I. Cirac and T. Prosen, Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 094304 [ 1911.11175]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [1203.1044]

    V.E. Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [1203.1044]. – 24 –

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Mezei and D

    M. Mezei and D. Stanford, On entanglement spreading in chaotic systems , JHEP 05 (2017) 065 [1608.05101]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Caceres, A

    E. Caceres, A. Kundu, A.K. Patra and S. Shashi, Page curves and bath deformations , SciPost Phys. Core 5 (2022) 033 [ 2107.00022]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT , Phys

    T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [ 1105.5165]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Fujita, T

    M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [1108.5152]

    2011 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Grimaldi, J

    G. Grimaldi, J. Hernandez and R.C. Myers, Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part IV. Massive black holes on the brane , JHEP 03 (2022) 136 [ 2202.00679]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim. B 44S10 (1966) 1

    1966

  62. [70]

    Headrick, S

    M. Headrick, S. Kitchen and T. Wiseman, A New approach to static numerical relativity, and its application to Kaluza-Klein black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 035002 [ 0905.1822]

    2010 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Chen, R.C

    H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane , JHEP 12 (2020) 025 [ 2010.00018]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Chen, R.C

    H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane , JHEP 10 (2020) 166 [ 2006.04851]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dvali, G

    G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4-D gravity on a brane in 5-D Minkowski space , Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [ hep-th/0005016]

    2000 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Verheijden and E

    E. Verheijden and E. Verlinde, From the BTZ black hole to JT gravity: geometrizing the island , JHEP 11 (2021) 092 [ 2102.00922]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ugajin, Two dimensional quantum quenches and holography , 1311.2562

    T. Ugajin, Two dimensional quantum quenches and holography , 1311.2562

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Shimaji, T

    T. Shimaji, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Holographic Quantum Circuits from Splitting/Joining Local Quenches, JHEP 03 (2019) 165 [ 1812.01176]. – 25 –

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.