pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.15134 · v2 · submitted 2024-12-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Use of Faulty States in Cat-Code Error Correction

Michael Hanks , Soovin Lee , Nicolo Lo Piparo , Shin Nishio , William J. Munro , Kae Nemoto , M.S. Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords cat codesbosonic codesquantum error correctionsyndrome extractionancillary statesteleportation circuitfault tolerance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cat code quantum error correction works with many-component bridge states outside the code space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the teleportation-based correction circuit for cat codes and shows that ancillary states need not be perfect cat states themselves. It proposes instead the use of many-component bridge states that can still perform syndrome extraction. This matters because preparing ideal cat states requires strong nonlinear interactions that are currently a hardware bottleneck. A sympathetic reader would see this as relaxing the demands on state preparation while preserving the ability to correct errors in bosonic systems.

Core claim

The class of acceptable ancillary states for cat-code error correction is broader than typically acknowledged; many-component bridge states, though not in the cat code space, remain capable of syndrome extraction in the regime where nonlinear interactions are the limiting factor.

What carries the argument

The teleportation-based correction circuit using bridge states to perform syndrome extraction without requiring the full nonlinear strength needed for ideal cat-state preparation.

If this is right

  • Syndrome extraction becomes possible in hardware where strong nonlinear interactions remain unavailable.
  • Preparation of ancillary states can use weaker or different interactions than those required for cat states.
  • The overall resource overhead for cat-code maintenance may decrease because fewer ideal states are needed.
  • Fault-tolerant architectures built from cat codes become feasible at lower interaction strengths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar relaxation of ancillary-state requirements might apply to other rotationally symmetric bosonic codes.
  • Hardware experiments could test bridge-state performance by varying the number of components while measuring logical error rates.
  • The approach may reduce the calibration burden on control systems that must generate precise cat states.

Load-bearing premise

The teleportation-based correction circuit can employ these bridge states for syndrome extraction without introducing uncorrectable errors or requiring the same nonlinear interactions.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in which bridge states are used in the teleportation circuit and produce logical errors that the cat code cannot correct.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15134 by Kae Nemoto, Michael Hanks, M.S. Kim, Nicolo Lo Piparo, Shin Nishio, Soovin Lee, William J. Munro.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the binning procedure for heterodyne phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Modular Photon Number Measurement shown in Figure 1 (c). Final state fidelities and their probabilities, with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Example photon number distribution for a displaced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Tele-correction as shown in Figure 1 (a), with a Yurke-Stoler input state to the first rail. These states are displaced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bosonic codes have seen a resurgence in interest for applications as varied as fault tolerant quantum architectures, quantum enhanced sensing, and entanglement distribution. Cat codes have been proposed as low-level elements in larger architectures, and the theory of rotationally symmetric codes more generally has been significantly expanded in the recent literature. The fault-tolerant preparation and maintenance of cat code states as a stand-alone quantum error correction scheme remains however limited by the need for robust state preparation and strong inter-mode interactions. In this work, we consider the teleportation-based correction circuit for cat code quantum error correction. We show that the class of acceptable ancillary states is broader than is typically acknowledged, and exploit this to propose the use of many-component ``bridge'' states which, though not themselves in the cat code space, are nonetheless capable of syndrome extraction in the regime where non-linear interactions are a limiting factor.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the teleportation-based error-correction circuit for cat codes and argues that the class of usable ancillary states is larger than conventionally assumed. It introduces many-component 'bridge' states lying outside the cat-code space that are nevertheless claimed to enable syndrome extraction, thereby relaxing the requirement for strong nonlinear interactions.

Significance. If the error-propagation analysis is sound, the result would meaningfully widen the design space for ancillary-state preparation in bosonic QEC, reducing reliance on experimentally demanding nonlinear resources and potentially accelerating near-term demonstrations of cat-code fault tolerance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main-text circuit analysis] The central claim that bridge states outside the rotational-symmetry subspace still map all deviations to correctable errors rests on an unstated assumption about the teleportation circuit. No explicit derivation of the effective error channel (interaction Hamiltonian plus measurement) is supplied showing that components outside the code space preserve the parity-extraction property without introducing uncorrectable errors on the data mode.
  2. [Section describing the proposed bridge-state protocol] The weakest assumption identified—that the teleportation circuit employing bridge states requires no additional nonlinear interactions—is not accompanied by a concrete Hamiltonian or Kraus-map calculation confirming that the syndrome extraction remains faithful.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the bridge-state components is introduced without a clear definition of the rotational symmetry subspace they occupy; a short appendix tabulating the overlap with the cat-code basis would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the referee's report. We have carefully considered the major comments regarding the need for explicit derivations in our analysis of bridge states for cat-code error correction. Below, we provide point-by-point responses and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and main-text circuit analysis] The central claim that bridge states outside the rotational-symmetry subspace still map all deviations to correctable errors rests on an unstated assumption about the teleportation circuit. No explicit derivation of the effective error channel (interaction Hamiltonian plus measurement) is supplied showing that components outside the code space preserve the parity-extraction property without introducing uncorrectable errors on the data mode.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation would strengthen the presentation. The original manuscript relies on the established properties of the teleportation-based circuit for cat codes, where the ancillary state interacts via a controlled-phase or similar gate to extract parity. However, to address this, we will add a new subsection deriving the effective error channel step by step, showing how the multi-component bridge states ensure that any deviation in the data mode is projected onto correctable error subspaces without uncorrectable leakage. This derivation will use the standard beam-splitter or dispersive interaction Hamiltonian appropriate for the circuit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section describing the proposed bridge-state protocol] The weakest assumption identified—that the teleportation circuit employing bridge states requires no additional nonlinear interactions—is not accompanied by a concrete Hamiltonian or Kraus-map calculation confirming that the syndrome extraction remains faithful.

    Authors: The manuscript argues that bridge states can be prepared and used with linear optics or existing resources, avoiding strong nonlinearities for the syndrome extraction itself. To make this rigorous, the revised manuscript will include an explicit Hamiltonian for the interaction (e.g., a cross-Kerr or beam-splitter Hamiltonian between data and ancilla) and the corresponding Kraus operators post-measurement, verifying that the syndrome extraction fidelity is preserved for the bridge states. We believe this will confirm the claim without requiring additional nonlinear resources beyond those in standard cat-code protocols. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent extension of ancillary-state class

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the acceptable ancillary states for teleportation-based cat-code correction include many-component bridge states outside the code space—is presented as an observation and proposal without reduction to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or derivation steps in the abstract or described content equate the output to the input by construction; the argument relies on an expanded class of states for syndrome extraction, which is treated as an independent broadening rather than a tautology or renamed prior result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven assertion that bridge states preserve syndrome information in the teleportation circuit. This is a domain assumption about bosonic mode dynamics with no independent evidence supplied in the abstract. No free parameters or numerical fits are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics of bosonic modes and teleportation-based error correction circuits apply without modification.
    The work operates entirely within established quantum information theory for continuous-variable systems.
invented entities (1)
  • bridge states no independent evidence
    purpose: Multi-component ancillary states outside the cat code space used for syndrome extraction
    New class of states introduced to relax nonlinear interaction requirements; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1466 out tokens · 40432 ms · 2026-05-23T07:10:59.426133+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Modular Photon Number Measurement In the modular photon number measurement of Fig- ure 1 (c), we are able to account for relative phases be- tween coherent states in the probe subsystem. Using a coherent state |β⟩ as the target input subsystem and a YS state of amplitudeα as the probe, we have 1√ N NX m=1 eiξm e− |β| 2 ∞X n=0 βn √ n! |n⟩| − αeiϕme−i4π n K...

    work page

  2. [2]

    βan,µK/2 p (an,µK/2)! δbn′ ,ν K′/2 p (bn′,νK ′/2)! # |an,µK/2⟩ ⊗

    Relative Phases in Tele-correction While the relative phases of the YS states can be cor- rected in modular photon number measurements, it may be expected that they would remain detrimental in tele- correction as these states do not have the photon number distribution of true cat code states. This turns out not to be the case; below we explore the perform...

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Shor, inProceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foun- dations of Computer Science (IEEE Comput

    P. Shor, inProceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foun- dations of Computer Science (IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 1994) pp. 124–134

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    The cost of solving linear differential equations on a quantum com- puter: fast-forwarding to explicit resource counts

    D. Jennings, M. Lostaglio, R. B. Lowrie, S. Pallister, and A. T. Sornborger, The cost of solving linear differential equations on a quantum computer: Fast-forwarding to explicit resource counts (2023), arXiv:2309.07881 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    K.Zaman, A.Marchisio, M.A.Hanif,andM.Shafique,A Survey on Quantum Machine Learning: Current Trends, Challenges, Opportunities, and the Road Ahead (2023), arXiv:2310.10315 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Pan, G.-L

    D. Pan, G.-L. Long, L. Yin, Y.-B. Sheng, D. Ruan, S. X. Ng, J. Lu, and L. Hanzo, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials26, 1898 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Pirandola, U

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. Sham- sul Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P.Villoresi,andP.Wallden,AdvancesinOpticsandPho- tonics 12, 1012 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    M. A. Taylor and W. P. Bowen, Physics Reports615, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. Van Den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zale- tel, K. Temme, and A. Kandala, Nature618, 500 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, et al., Nature574, 505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Pan and P

    F. Pan and P. Zhang, Simulating the Sycamore quantum supremacy circuits (2021), arXiv:2103.03074 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Tindall, M

    J. Tindall, M. Fishman, E. M. Stoudenmire, and D. Sels, PRX Quantum5, 010308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    H.-J. Liao, K. Wang, Z.-S. Zhou, P. Zhang, and T. Xiang, Simulation of IBM’s kicked Ising experiment with Pro- jected Entangled Pair Operator (2023), arXiv:2308.03082 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Beguˇ si´ c and G

    T. Begušić and G. K.-L. Chan, Fast classical simulation of evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance (2023), arXiv:2306.16372 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Clinton, T

    L. Clinton, T. Cubitt, B. Flynn, F. M. Gambetta, J. Klassen, A. Montanaro, S. Piddock, R. A. Santos, and E. Sheridan, Nature Communications15, 211 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    N. C. Rubin, D. W. Berry, A. Kononov, F. D. Malone, T. Khattar, A. White, J. Lee, H. Neven, R. Babbush, and A. D. Baczewski, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2317772121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Gidney and M

    C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, Quantum5, 433 (2021). 8

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Limitations of Noisy Reversible Computation

    D. Aharonov, M. Ben-Or, R. Impagliazzo, and N. Nisan, Limitations of Noisy Reversible Computation (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9611028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  19. [19]

    Müller-Hermes, D

    A. Müller-Hermes, D. Stilck França, and M. M. Wolf, Journal of Mathematical Physics57, 022202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Raussendorf, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences 370, 4541 (2012)

    R. Raussendorf, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences 370, 4541 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Campbell, Nature Reviews Physics6, 160 (2024)

    E. Campbell, Nature Reviews Physics6, 160 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Ryan-Anderson, J

    C. Ryan-Anderson, J. G. Bohnet, K. Lee, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, J. P. Gaebler, D. Francois, A. Chernoguzov, D.Lucchetti, N.C.Brown, T.M.Gatterman, S.K.Halit, K. Gilmore, J. A. Gerber, B. Neyenhuis, D. Hayes, and R. P. Stutz, Physical Review X11, 041058 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Sundaresan, T

    N. Sundaresan, T. J. Yoder, Y. Kim, M. Li, E. H. Chen, G. Harper, T. Thorbeck, A. W. Cross, A. D. Córcoles, and M. Takita, Nature Communications14, 2852 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Evered, Alexandra A

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. B. Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. S. Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Nature 10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 2023

  25. [25]

    Acharya, I

    Google Quantum AI, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, R. Allen, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. As- faw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson,et al., Nature614, 676 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    R. K. Naik, N. Leung, S. Chakram, P. Groszkowski, Y. Lu, N. Earnest, D. C. McKay, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, Nature Communications8, 1904 (2017)

    work page 1904

  27. [27]

    Duckering, J

    C. Duckering, J. M. Baker, D. I. Schuster, and F. T. Chong, in 2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM In- ternational Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) (IEEE, Athens, Greece, 2020) pp. 173–185

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brandão, PRX Quantum3, 010329 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    K. Noh, C. Chamberland, and F. G. Brandão, PRX Quantum 3, 010315 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Y. Xu, Y. Wang, E.-J. Kuo, and V. V. Albert, PRX Quantum 4, 020342 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Rozpędek, K

    F. Rozpędek, K. P. Seshadreesan, P. Polakos, L. Jiang, and S. Guha, Physical Review Research5, 043056 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    P.-Z. Li, J. Dias, W. J. Munro, P. Van Loock, K. Nemoto, and N. Lo Piparo, Advanced Quantum Technologies7, 2300252 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    S. L. Braunstein, Nature394, 47 (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Phys- ical Review A59, 2631 (1999)

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Physical Re- view A64, 012310 (2001)

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    Pantaleoni, B

    G. Pantaleoni, B. Q. Baragiola, and N. C. Menicucci, Physical Review Letters125, 040501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    A.L.Grimsmo, J.Combes,andB.Q.Baragiola,Physical Review X10, 011058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Y. Shi, C. Chamberland, and A. Cross, New Journal of Physics 21, 093007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    A. M. Steane, Nature399, 124 (1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    Fault-Tolerant Postselected Quantum Computation: Schemes

    E. Knill, Fault-Tolerant Postselected Quantum Compu- tation: Schemes (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0402171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  42. [42]

    W. J. Munro, G. J. Milburn, and B. C. Sanders, Physical Review A62, 052108 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Jeong and M

    H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, Physical Review A65, 042305 (2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Physical Review A68, 042319 (2003)

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Science312, 83 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Ourjoumtsev, H

    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Nature448, 784 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    M.TakeokaandM.Sasaki,PhysicalReviewA 75,064302 (2007)

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, Physical Review Letters100, 030503 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Takahashi, K

    H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Physical Re- view Letters101, 233605 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    Arenz, C

    C. Arenz, C. Cormick, D. Vitali, and G. Morigi, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 224001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    M. J. Everitt, T. P. Spiller, G. J. Milburn, R. D. Wilson, and A. M. Zagoskin, Frontiers in ICT 1, 10.3389/fict.2014.00001 (2014)

    work page doi:10.3389/fict.2014.00001 2014

  52. [52]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, npj Quantum Informa- tion 3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Physical Review Letters57, 13 (1986)

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    Sherman and G

    B. Sherman and G. Kurizki, Physical Review A 45, R7674 (1992)

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    B. M. Garraway, B. Sherman, H. Moya-Cessa, P. L. Knight, and G. Kurizki, Physical Review A 49, 535 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    K. S. Lee, M. S. Kim, and V. B˘ uzek, Journal of the Op- tical Society of America B11, 1118 (1994)

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    G. S. Agarwal and P. K. Pathak, Physical Review A70, 053813 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Hastrup, J

    J. Hastrup, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Optics Letters45, 640 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Nehra, M

    R. Nehra, M. Eaton, O. Pfister, and A. Marandi, inCon- ference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (Optica Publishing Group, San Jose, California, 2022) p. FF2I.2

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Glancy, H

    S. Glancy, H. M. Vasconcelos, and T. C. Ralph, Physical Review A70, 022317 (2004)

    work page 2004

  61. [61]

    Li, C.-L

    L. Li, C.-L. Zou, V. V. Albert, S. Muralidharan, S. M. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Physical Review Letters 119, 030502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Physical Review X 9, 041053 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Guillaud, J

    J. Guillaud, J. Cohen, and M. Mirrahimi, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 72 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    A. S. Darmawan, B. J. Brown, A. L. Grimsmo, D. K. Tuckett, and S. Puri, PRX Quantum2, 030345 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Fukui, A

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, A. Okamoto, and K. Fujii, Physical Review X8, 021054 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Vuillot, H

    C. Vuillot, H. Asasi, Y. Wang, L. P. Pryadko, and B. M. Terhal, Physical Review A99, 032344 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Noh and C

    K. Noh and C. Chamberland, Physical Review A101, 012316 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    M. V. Larsen, C. Chamberland, K. Noh, J. S. Neergaard- Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, PRX Quantum2, 030325 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Hänggli, M

    L. Hänggli, M. Heinze, and R. König, Physical Review A 102, 052408 (2020). 9

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Itogawa, Y

    T. Itogawa, Y. Takada, Y. Hirano, and K. Fujii, Even more efficient magic state distillation by zero-level distil- lation (2024), arXiv:2403.03991 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates

    C. Gidney, N. Shutty, and C. Jones, Magic state cultiva- tion: Growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates (2024), arXiv:2409.17595 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Physical Review Let- ters 111, 120501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    N. Ofek, A. Petrenko, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, Y. Liu, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Na- ture 536, 441 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    V. V. Albert, C. Shu, S. Krastanov, C. Shen, R.-B. Liu, Z.-B. Yang, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and L. Jiang, Physical Review Letters116, 140502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Hillmann, F

    T. Hillmann, F. Quijandría, A. L. Grimsmo, and G. Fer- rini, PRX Quantum3, 020334 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    C. Oh, C. Lee, C. Rockstuhl, H. Jeong, J. Kim, H. Nha, and S.-Y. Lee, npj Quantum Information5, 10 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    L. S. Martin, W. P. Livingston, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, H. M. Wiseman, and I. Siddiqi, Nature Physics16, 1046 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Schöpf and P

    H. Schöpf and P. Supancic, The Mathematica Journal 16, 10.3888/tmj.16-11 (2014)

    work page doi:10.3888/tmj.16-11 2014

Showing first 80 references.