Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

The skein valued mirror of the topological vertex

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the topological vertex — the combinatorial partition function of topological string theory — is the skein-valued count of holomorphic curves in C3 with boundary on three toric Lagrangian solid tori.

desk verdict Impressive algebraic core, honest geometric sketch; worth a serious referee but needs the triangle cancellation written out. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15454 v1 pith:SU3FLYGB submitted 2024-12-19 math.SG hep-th

Tobias Ekholm , Pietro Longhi , Vivek Shende This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SGhep-th MSC 53D3753D42
keywords topologicalvertexskein-valuedcurvecountingHOMFLYPTskeinmoduletoricLagrangianboundaryconditionsholomorphiccurvesoperatorrecursionskewSchurfunctionsmirrorsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish the original geometric meaning of the topological vertex: a purely combinatorial object from topological string theory that takes three partitions and returns a Laurent series. The authors prove that this object equals the count of holomorphic curves in complex 3-space with boundary on three special Lagrangian solid tori, where the count is valued in the HOMFLYPT skein module of the boundary. Their route is to derive three operator equations that must annihilate the count from 1-parameter families of curves at infinity, show algebraically that these equations determine the count uniquely, and identify the unique solution with the topological vertex. If the proof is right, string theory's basic building block for toric Calabi-Yau geometries is now a theorem in symplectic geometry rather than a conjecture.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the three skein-valued operators A1, A2, A3 in the skein algebra of R \times $T^{2}$, each a signed monomial combination of P_{i,j} curves on the three boundary tori. They are obtained from the boundary of 1-dimensional moduli spaces: after Morsifying the Reeb chords, rigid holomorphic disks and triangles at infinity are counted, and Proposition 15 chooses signs, framing monomials, and capping paths so that the six triangle contributions cancel in pairs. The operators act on the W_{\$\lambda$,\emptyset} basis of the annulus skein, and the action formulas from [26] translate A_i \cdot Z = 0 into a recursion (R^i_j) on the coefficients T_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3}. Skew Schur and Pieri identities show that this recursion has a unique solution, which is the topological vertex formula.

What would settle it

Compute the coefficient of W_{\square,\emptyset} \otimes W_{\square,\emptyset} \otimes W_{\emptyset,\emptyset} in the geometric count directly from Lemma 9 (one disk plus one nodal annulus) and compare it with the vertex formula value 1 + ($q^{{1/2}}$ - $q^{{-1/2}}$)^{-2}; more decisively, list the six triangle terms of Proposition 15 with their proven signs and framing monomials and verify the pairwise cancellation explicitly, since a single surviving triangle would produce a nonzero term in A1 \cdot Z that the recursion forbids.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in the skein-valued curve counting formalism of [18], the paper considers Z_{C3,L1,L2,L3}, the partition function of holomorphic curves in C3 with boundary on three toric Lagrangian solid tori L1, L2, L3, expanded in the basis W_{\lambda_1,\emptyset} \otimes W_{\lambda_2,\emptyset} \otimes W_{\lambda_3,\emptyset} of the skein of the three-torus boundary. The main geometric theorem is that three explicit skein elements A1, A2, A3, built from the P_{i,j} basis of the skein algebra of R \times $T^{2}$, annihilate this count: A_i \cdot Z = 0. These operators are obtained by counting rigid curves in the symplectization at infinity and cancelling the triangle contributions in pairs after a Morsification of the Reeb chords; the same operators dequantize to the augmentation variety of the Legendrian link. An algebraic theorem shows that the annihilation equations, with initial condition T_{\emptyset,\emptyset,\emptyset} = 1, have the unique solution T_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3} = (-1)^{|\lambda_1|+|\lambda_2|+|\lambda_3|} C_{\lambda_1^t,\lambda_2^t,\lambda_3^t}, where C is the topological vertex defined by skew Schur functions. Hence the vertex is the skein-valued curve count.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on a cancellation computation carried out by hand and figures: after a small generic perturbation of the contact form at infinity, the only boundary configurations are three disk families and two triangle families, and the triangles cancel in pairs once signs, framing monomials, and capping paths are chosen; if any hidden configuration or a sign mismatch survives, the claimed operator equations and the identification with the vertex do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The topological vertex is not merely a combinatorial rule: it is the skein-valued holomorphic curve count for three toric Lagrangian solid tori in C3, giving the first rigorous geometric proof of its original string-theoretic interpretation.
  • The recursion system (R^i_j) with initial condition T_{\emptyset,\emptyset,\emptyset} = 1 characterizes the vertex uniquely, so any future geometric or algebraic construction satisfying these equations must agree with the vertex.
  • The operators A_i annihilate the count and dequantize to the augmentation variety of the Legendrian link at infinity, so the paper constructs a skein-valued quantization of that mirror curve.
  • The framework extends to the other three fillings of the same Legendrian link, where the same cancellation argument yields explicit skein-valued partition functions for disk, annulus, and twisted annulus contributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could turn Proposition 15 into a fully computational check: enumerate the six triangle configurations with explicit signs and framing monomials in a computer algebra implementation; if any pair fails to cancel, the operator equation would be corrected before the rest of the paper is affected.
  • Because the algebraic uniqueness theorem shows the vertex is the only solution of the A_i equations, the same skein-valued mirror construction might be carried out for other toric Calabi-Yau geometries with toric Lagrangian boundaries, replacing the three torus factors by more general skein modules.
  • The U(1) specialization and dequantization suggest a concrete testable bridge: the same recursion, specialized to one-row partitions, should reproduce the augmentation variety of the Legendrian link; comparing with existing DGA computations would provide an independent check of the sign conventions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the skein-valued count of holomorphic curves in C^3 with boundary on three special Lagrangian solid tori, and claims that this count is computed by the topological vertex. The argument has three parts: an algebraic recursion (Theorem 1) showing that a certain system of six operator equations, together with the empty configuration count 1, uniquely determines the coefficients T_{λ1,λ2,λ3} as signed versions of the topological vertex; a symmetric-function and skein-algebra computation (Proposition 2) showing that the operator equations A_i · Z = 0 are equivalent to that recursion; and a geometric derivation (Theorem 3) of the operator equations from curve counts at infinity, relying on a Morsification of the Reeb chord families and Proposition 15, which asserts cancellation of all triangle contributions. The paper concludes with Corollary 4 identifying the geometric count with the topological vertex, and with appendices containing U(1) specializations and conjectural formulas for other fillings.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is a landmark result: it would be the first rigorous geometric proof that the topological vertex, defined combinatorially by skew Schur functions, equals a holomorphic curve count with Lagrangian boundary in C^3. The algebraic part of the paper — Theorem 1 and Proposition 2 — is clean, checkable, and appears sound; it gives a genuinely useful recursion for the vertex. The geometric part is much more delicate: Theorem 3 rests on a skein-valued SFT compactness/gluing framework and on Proposition 15, whose proof is only sketched with figures and choices. The paper is honest about this, explicitly calling the search for canceling combinations 'an art rather than a science' (Section 3.1), but for the central claim to be load-bearing the cancellation must be demonstrated with explicit, checkable data. The appendices are exploratory and would need separate justification if they are intended as theorems. Overall the result is significant and plausible, but the geometric proof as written is not complete enough for the announced conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.6, Proposition 15] Proposition 15 is the load-bearing step in the proof of Theorem 3: it asserts that after Morsification all triangle contributions to the capped operators A_j cancel in pairs, leaving the three disk families whose skein classes are identified with the P^{(k)}_{i,j} terms. The proof as written is not checkable. It says that cancellation is 'at least plausible', then asserts 'We next show there in fact is such a cap' and refers to Figures 4–10, but the six triangle tangles are never written down explicitly: their boundary arcs on each Λ_j, negative Reeb-chord endpoints, framings, capping paths, spin-structure signs, and a-monomials are not listed. The reader cannot verify the pairwise cancellation, the signs, or the framing monomials from the text. Since the equation A_j · Z_{C^3,L_1,L_2,L_3} = 0 is derived exclusively from this cancellation, a hidden surviving triangle, wrong sign, or framing mismatch would invalidate Theorem 3 and hence Corollary 4. I request an explicit accounting of the six triangle contributions and their pairings, rather than a figure-based assertion.
  2. [§3.6, after Lemma 11] The Morsification step must not only cancel the two families of triangles appearing in Lemma 11(ii), but also ensure that the perturbation does not create additional rigid curves or additional flow trees with the chosen positive puncture at c_{k,k}. The proof invokes [9, Theorem 1.1] in one sentence, but does not enumerate the possible Morse flow trees after the perturbation. Lemma 11 enumerates Bott-rigid curves before Morsification; it does not automatically control all rigid configurations after perturbing the contact form and adding Morse flows. This gap is separate from the sign/framing issue in Proposition 15 and needs to be addressed explicitly, for example by showing that the only flow trees with positive puncture at a minimum are exactly the five types listed.
  3. [§3.7, coefficient determination] The final step of the proof of Theorem 3 determines the nine coefficients a^{(k)}_{i,j} of A_1 by matching leading terms in A_1 · Z, using the fact that the a^{(k)}_{i,j} are monomials and the sign pattern (−1)^{i+j}. This step is sound only if the set of P^{(k)}_{i,j} terms is exactly the nine listed and if Proposition 15 provides the asserted geometric identification of those terms. Since Proposition 15 is not demonstrated, the coefficient determination inherits the same gap. In addition, the sign rule 'any two disks have the same sign if and only if the restriction of the spin structure to their boundaries is the same' is asserted without a precise comparison of the spin-structure restrictions for the nine disks; a short derivation from the chosen spin structure in Section 3.5 would make this checkable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3, Lemma 9] The phrase 'nodal annuls' should read 'nodal annuli'; also, the proof of part (b) relies on a Floer gluing theorem for a family of disks but does not specify the version of the gluing theorem used or the exact perturbation setup, which would be helpful for readers who want to verify the transversality claim.
  2. [§3.6, proof of Proposition 15] The text says 'we pick the location ... to lie close to the evaluation map' and refers to dashed circles in the figures, but the figures are not accompanied by a legend explaining how red dots, dashed circles, black dots, and curve segments correspond to evaluation maps, neighborhoods, chord minima, and Morse flows. A precise caption or an explicit coordinate description would substantially improve readability and checkability.
  3. [§3.7, sign rule] The statement 'the sign in front of a^{(k)}_{i,j} is always (−1)^{i+j}' is introduced without deriving it from the chosen spin structures and framings; as written it is a claim that the reader must take on faith, even though it is used to fix two of the coefficients a^{(1)}_{0,1} and a^{(1)}_{1,0}.
  4. [Appendix B] Several formulas in Appendix B are introduced by 'one can show' or 'we content ourselves with recording without proof'; if these are meant to be conjectural, they should be labeled as such, and if they are meant to be theorems, they need proofs or at least precise statements of the geometric input used.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical and wording issues: 'obtianed' in Proposition 15, 'postive' in the caption of Figure 8, 'wtite' in the discussion of ⋆_f in Appendix B, and inconsistent use of 'a' vs. 'a_i' in the operator formulas in the introduction versus Section 3.7. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: geometric operator equations are calibrated by independent disk/annulus counts, and the topological vertex formula enters only as the unique algebraic solution.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is not circular. Theorem 1 establishes by Schur-function manipulation that T_{λ1,λ2,λ3}=(-1)^{|λ1|+|λ2|+|λ3|} C_{λ1^t,λ2^t,λ3^t} is the unique solution of the recursion system (R^i_j) with T_{∅,∅,∅}=1; the recursion is derived from a skew-Schur/Pieri identity, not from the geometric count. Proposition 2 converts the recursion into the operator equations A_i·Z=0 using the action formulas for P_{i,j} on W_{λ,∅}, quoted from the independent Morton–Samuelson paper [26]. Theorem 3 derives A_i·Z=0 from SFT compactness and gluing, the explicit rigid curves in Lemma 11, and the triangle-cancellation argument of Proposition 15. The undetermined monomial coefficients in A_i are fixed in Section 3.7 by matching the geometrically computed leading coefficients z_{∅,∅,∅}=1, z_{∅,∅,□}=-(q^{1/2}-q^{-1/2})^{-1}, and z_{∅,□,□}=z_{□,∅,□}=1+(q^{1/2}-q^{-1/2})^{-2}; these are inputs computed from disks and annuli (Lemma 9), not from the topological vertex formula. The vertex appears only at the end, as the unique algebraic solution of the resulting equations. Spin-structure and framing choices that affect signs and monomials are conventions defining the skein-valued count, and the paper explicitly notes that other choices would shift signs and transposes. The main weakness is that Proposition 15 is proven by a figure-based sketch, but a gap or unverified geometric claim is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. No equation is defined in terms of the target, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted in the central argument; q and a are skein variables, and the geometric choices are conventions rather than fitted numbers. The heavy input is external: the invariance of skein-valued curve counts, SFT gluing, and the Morse flow tree correspondence. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Skein-valued curve counting is well-defined and invariant.
    Invoked throughout; Z_{C3,L1,L2,L3} is defined in the framework of [18,16,15], which supplies compactness, transversality, and cancellation of boundary terms via skein relations.
  • domain assumption SFT compactness and gluing at transverse Reeb chords.
    Used in Section 3.1 to write the master equation A^-_rho · Z^+_{W,L} = 0, identifying boundaries of 1-dimensional moduli with symplectization curves glued to interior curves.
  • domain assumption No low-index Reeb orbit breaking in the S5 boundary.
    Section 3.1 explicitly omits breaking at orbits, asserting there are no orbits of low enough index; this is necessary for the simple gluing equation.
  • domain assumption Morse flow tree correspondence of [9, Theorem 1.1].
    Section 3.6 identifies Bott-degenerate holomorphic curves with flow trees after Morsification; this is a substantial external theorem.
  • domain assumption Floer gluing theorem for annuli in Lemma 9(b).
    The single annulus contribution is established by saying gluing arguments are standard; this underlies the leading terms used to fix operator coefficients.
  • standard math Skew Schur and Pieri/Littlewood-Richardson identities.
    Section 1's Lemmas 5 and 6 use standard symmetric function identities; these are standard and not in question.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The skein valued mirror of the topological vertex." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SU3FLYGB

@misc{pith2026241215454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The skein valued mirror of the topological vertex},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SU3FLYGB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15454}
}
read the original abstract

We count holomorphic curves in complex 3-space with boundaries on three special Lagrangian solid tori. The count is valued in the HOMFLYPT skein module of the union of the tori. Using 1-parameter families of curves at infinity, we derive three skein valued operator equations which must annihilate the count, and which dequantize to a mirror of the geometry. We show algebraically that the resulting equations determine the count uniquely, and that the result agrees with the topological vertex from topological string theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15454 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. HOMFLYPT skein relations in the variable z = q 1/2 − q −1/2 . Let us review the geometric setup. We work in the formalism of skein-valued curve count￾ing, which is a mathematically rigorous framework for counting holomorphic curves of all genera with Lagrangian boundary conditions L in a Calabi-Yau 3-fold X [18, 16, 15]. Recall that the skein module of L is generated by framed curves, subject to the relations of [P… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fillings and take Λ1 with θ1 = 0, Λ2 with θ2 = 2π 9 , and Λ3 with θ3 = 4π 9 . Noting that a shift by 2π 3 takes Λj to itself, we write Λk for the shift by 2πk 9 . 3.3. Leading disk and annulus contributions. We will determine the details of the skein operator equation using information about the simplest compact curves with boundary on one or two toric branes on different legs. These curves are as follows. Lemma 9. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The boundaries of three disks on the torus at infinity. It is then elementary to determine the curves in (ii) and (iii). We illustrate by two examples. A curve in (ii) is given by the sector bounded by R+ and e i 2π 3 R+ with a slit in the ray e i 2π 9 R+ or with a slit in the ray e i 4π 9 R+. A curve in (iii) is given by the sector bounded by R+ and e i 4π 9 with a slit in the ray e i 2π 9 R+. □ 3.5. Framing, 4-cha… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The location of the minimal action Reeb chords ckk which is also the image of the evaluation maps at the positive puncture of the triangles with positive puncture at ckk and negative punctures at bk,k+2 and ak+2,k+3 or at ak,k+1 and bk+1,k+3. that flow lines from evalu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The evaluation map ev of the Reeb chords at the negative end in the triangle with positive puncture c11 and negative punctures a12 and b21. Since the triangle lies in a fiber, the negative end point of a12 agrees with the negative endpoint of c11 and the positive endpo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Triangles with positive puncture at c11. Red dots indicate eval￾uation maps, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Triangles with positive puncture at c22. Notation as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Triangles with postive puncture at c33. Notation as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Capping disks for the positive punctures for cancellation of trian￾gles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Different choices of Morse flow lines in Bott manifolds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Topological strings and integrable hierarchies

    Mina Aganagic, Robbert Dijkgraaf, Albrecht Klemm, Marcos Marino, and Cumrun Vafa. Topological strings and integrable hierarchies. Communications in mathematical physics , 261:451–516, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Topological Strings, D-Model, and Knot Contact Homology

    Mina Aganagic, Tobias Ekholm, Lenhard Ng, and Cumrun Vafa. Topological Strings, D-Model, and Knot Contact Homology. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 18(4):827–956, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    The Topological vertex

    Mina Aganagic, Albrecht Klemm, Marcos Marino, and Cumrun Vafa. The Topological vertex. Commun. Math. Phys. , 254:425–478, 2005. THE SKEIN V ALUED MIRROR OF THE TOPOLOGICAL VERTEX 27

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Large N duality, mirror symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for knots

    Mina Aganagic and Cumrun Vafa. Large N duality, mirror symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for knots. arXiv:1204.4709

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs

    Mina Aganagic and Cumrun Vafa. Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs. hep- th/0012041

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    A Pieri rule for skew shapes

    Sami Assaf and Peter McNamara. A Pieri rule for skew shapes. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 118(1):277–290, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Bourgeois, Y

    F. Bourgeois, Y. Eliashberg, H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder. Compactness results in symplectic field theory. Geom. Topol., 7:799–888, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Knot contact homology, string topol- ogy, and the cord algebra

    Kai Cieliebak, Tobias Ekholm, Janko Latschev, and Lenhard Ng. Knot contact homology, string topol- ogy, and the cord algebra. J. ´Ec. polytech. Math. , 4:661–780, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Morse flow trees and Legendrian contact homology in 1-jet spaces

    Tobias Ekholm. Morse flow trees and Legendrian contact homology in 1-jet spaces. Geom. Topol., 11:1083–1224, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Rational symplectic field theory over Z2 for exact Lagrangian cobordisms

    Tobias Ekholm. Rational symplectic field theory over Z2 for exact Lagrangian cobordisms. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 10(3):641–704, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Duality between Lagrangian and Legendrian invariants

    Tobias Ekholm and Yankı Lekili. Duality between Lagrangian and Legendrian invariants. Geometry & Topology, 27(6):2049–2179, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    The worldsheet skein D-module and basic curves on Lagrangian fillings of the Hopf link conormal

    Tobias Ekholm, Pietro Longhi, and Lukas Nakamura. The worldsheet skein D-module and basic curves on Lagrangian fillings of the Hopf link conormal. arxiv:2407.09836

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Higher genus knot contact homology and recursion for colored HOMFLY-PT polynomials

    Tobias Ekholm and Lenhard Ng. Higher genus knot contact homology and recursion for colored HOMFLY-PT polynomials. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 24(8):2067–2145, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Colored HOMFLYPT counts holomorphic curves, arXiv:2101.00619

    Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende. Colored HOMFLYPT counts holomorphic curves, arXiv:2101.00619

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Counting bare curves

    Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende. Counting bare curves. arXiv:2406.00890

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ghost bubble censorship

    Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende. Ghost bubble censorship. arXiv:2212.05835

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Skein recursion for holomorphic curves and invariants of the unknot

    Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende. Skein recursion for holomorphic curves and invariants of the unknot. arXiv:2012.15366

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Skeins on branes, arXiv:1901.08027

    Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende. Skeins on branes, arXiv:1901.08027

    1901 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Eliashberg, A

    Y. Eliashberg, A. Givental, and H. Hofer. Introduction to symplectic field theory. pages 560–673. 2000. GAF A 2000 (Tel Aviv, 1999)

    2000

  12. [20]

    Sectorial descent for wrapped Fukaya categories

    Sheel Ganatra, John Pardon, and Vivek Shende. Sectorial descent for wrapped Fukaya categories. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 37(2):499–635, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    A basis for the full Homfly skein of the annulus

    Richard Hadji and Hugh Morton. A basis for the full Homfly skein of the annulus. Mathematical Pro- ceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 141(1):81–100, 2006

    2006

  14. [22]

    Applications of polyfold theory I: The polyfolds of Gromov-Witten theory

    Helmut Hofer, Krzysztof Wysocki, and Eduard Zehnder. Applications of polyfold theory I: The polyfolds of Gromov-Witten theory. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 248(1179), 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    A mathematical theory of the topological vertex

    Jun Li, Chiu-Chu Melissa Liu, Kefeng Liu, and Jian Zhou. A mathematical theory of the topological vertex. Geom. Topol., 13(1):527–621, 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory, I

    Davesh Maulik, Nikita Nekrasov, Andrei Okounkov, and Rahul Pandharipande. Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory, I. Compositio Mathematica, 142(5):1263–1285, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Gromov- Witten/Donaldson-Thomas correspondence for toric 3-folds

    Davesh Maulik, Alexei Oblomkov, Andrei Okounkov, and Rahul Pandharipande. Gromov- Witten/Donaldson-Thomas correspondence for toric 3-folds. Inventiones mathematicae , 186:435–479, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    The HOMFLYPT skein algebra of the torus and the elliptic Hall algebra

    Hugh Morton and Peter Samuelson. The HOMFLYPT skein algebra of the torus and the elliptic Hall algebra. Duke Mathematical Journal , 166(5):801–854, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Quantum Calabi-Yau and Classical Crystals

    Andrei Okounkov, Nikolai Reshetikhin, and Cumrun Vafa. Quantum Calabi-Yau and Classical Crystals. Progress in Mathematics, 244:597–618, 2006

    2006

  20. [28]

    Knot invariants and topological strings

    Hirosi Ooguri and Cumrun Vafa. Knot invariants and topological strings. Nucl. Phys. , B577:419–438, 2000

    2000

  21. [29]

    Quantum mirrors of cubic planar graph Legendrians

    Matthias Scharitzer and Vivek Shende. Quantum mirrors of cubic planar graph Legendrians. arXiv:2304.01872. 28 TOBIAS EKHOLM, PIETRO LONGHI, AND VIVEK SHENDE Department of Mathematics and Centre for Geometry and Physics Uppsala University, Box 480, 751 06 Uppsala, Sweden and In...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.