Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Ensembling Large Language Models with Process Reward-Guided Tree Search for Better Complex Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15797 v1 pith:3JXEDU3L submitted 2024-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languagereasoningmodelsensemblele-mctsmodelcomplexsearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite recent advances in large language models, open-source models often struggle to consistently perform well on complex reasoning tasks. Existing ensemble methods, whether applied at the token or output levels, fail to address these challenges. In response, we present Language model Ensemble with Monte Carlo Tree Search (LE-MCTS), a novel framework for process-level ensembling of language models. LE-MCTS formulates step-by-step reasoning with an ensemble of language models as a Markov decision process. In this framework, states represent intermediate reasoning paths, while actions consist of generating the next reasoning step using one of the language models selected from a predefined pool. Guided by a process-based reward model, LE-MCTS performs a tree search over the reasoning steps generated by different language models, identifying the most accurate reasoning chain. Experimental results on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach outperforms both single language model decoding algorithms and language model ensemble methods. Notably, LE-MCTS improves performance by 3.6% and 4.3% on the MATH and MQA datasets, respectively, highlighting its effectiveness in solving complex reasoning problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAHALO aligns LLMs to multiple objectives in one model via per-objective action heads and PRM-guided decoding, improving math, value, and tutoring metrics jointly.

  2. Beyond the First Error: Process Reward Models for Reflective Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A process reward model trained with Error Propagation and Error Cessation labels from an o1 judge outperforms existing PRMs on math selection and step-level scoring.

  3. GEMMAS: Graph-based Evaluation Metrics for Multi Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    GEMMAS proposes two graph-based metrics for multi-agent LLM collaboration, but its redundancy metric is defined using ground-truth answer correctness rather than actual information redundancy.

  4. Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A three-model, three-dataset LLM math evaluation using a multi-dimensional reasoning rubric, undermined by contradictory accuracy tables.

Pith tools