Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper extends the generalized Wilson line approach to gravitational scattering of spinning bodies, deriving a spin-1/2 soft Wilson line from the supersymmetric worldline and a classical Wilson line that reproduces known 2PM spin…

desk verdict A solid methodological extension of GWL to spin with a known-result cross-check; the classical spin power counting is the main caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16049 v1 pith:JRE6TXTF submitted 2024-12-20 hep-th

Domenico Bonocore , Anna Kulesza , Johannes Pirsch This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords generalizedWilsonlinesgravitationalscatteringspinpost-Minkowskianexpansionworldlineformalismsupersymmetricsoftgravitontheoremseikonalphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to bring spinning bodies into the generalized Wilson line (GWL) framework for gravitational scattering, where classical post-Minkowskian observables are computed as vacuum expectation values of Wilson-like operators rather than by traditional amplitude methods. Starting from the N=1 supersymmetric worldline model of a relativistic particle, the authors derive a spin-1/2 soft GWL that exponentiates next-to-soft graviton emissions, and a classical GWL whose vacuum expectation value generates classical observables linear in spin. The central payoff is a manifest map from the worldline's Grassmann spin variables to the classical spin tensor, so the classical limit can be taken at the Lagrangian level without matching to a separate effective field theory. The method is validated by reproducing the known 1PM and 2PM eikonal phases for spin-orbit scattering.

What carries the argument

The key object is the N=1 supersymmetric worldline model of a relativistic particle in a curved background, quantized with px-ordering and fermion doubling. The conserved supercharge $Q$, evaluated at asymptotic time, reduces to the free Dirac numerator and guarantees that the background field does not contribute to the spin structure of the dressed propagator. The soft expansion then organizes the path integral into an exponential of vertices built from the Lorentz generator $\sigma^{ab}=\frac{i}{4}[\gamma^{a},\gamma^{b}]$ and, classically, from the spin tensor $S^{ab}$. The classical GWL replaces the soft Green function $-\min(t,s)$ with the time-symmetric $|t-s|/2$, implementing an uninterrupted worldline from $-\infty$ to $+\infty$.

What would settle it

Compute the 2PM eikonal phase at quadratic order in spin using the same classical GWL and compare with known results; if the $\psi \to \sqrt{\lambda}\,\psi$ scaling and the neglect of spin-fluctuation loops fail to reproduce those results, the central assumption is falsified. Alternatively, check the predicted exponentiation of the next-to-soft graviton factor by computing the two-graviton emission with fermionic matter at next-to-eikonal order and verifying that no spin-dependent correlation appears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that generalized Wilson lines, previously constructed for scalar particles, can be extended to spinning particles in two forms. At the quantum level, the spin-1/2 soft GWL is derived from first principles in the N=1 supersymmetric worldline model; it exponentiates the single-emission next-to-soft graviton factor and shows that two-graviton correlations remain spin-independent because gravity is abelian in this sector. At the classical level, the classical GWL is obtained by rescaling the Grassmann variables as $\psi \to \sqrt{\lambda}\,\psi$ and using time-symmetric worldline Green functions $G_{\rm cl.}(t,s)=|t-s|/2$; its vacuum expectation value yields the 2PM eikonal phase, including the linear-in-spin term, in agreement with existing results. The paper also shows that the soft expansion provides a direct map from Grassmann variables to the classical spin tensor $S^{ab}=i\eta^{a}\eta^{b}$, removing the need for an effective-field-theory matching step.

Load-bearing premise

The classical limit assumes the worldline Grassmann spin variables scale as $\psi \to \sqrt{\lambda}\,\psi$ and that every diagram containing a loop of the dynamical spin fluctuation is non-classical and can be discarded; change that scaling and the classical Wilson line, hence the 2PM observables, change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spin-1/2 soft GWL implies that next-to-soft graviton emissions exponentiate for fermionic matter, with spin entering only through single-graviton vertices at next-to-eikonal order.
  • The classical GWL provides a route to classical observables for spinning bodies without matching to a worldline effective field theory, since the spin tensor is read off directly from the Grassmann boundary data.
  • At 2PM, the scalar and linear-in-spin eikonal phases computed from the GWL vacuum expectation value agree with the literature, validating the power counting and boundary conditions.
  • The paper's mapping of single- and double-graviton GWL vertices onto on-shell heavy-mass amplitudes indicates a direct equivalence between worldline-based and amplitude-based formulations of classical gravitational scattering.
  • Because the worldline degrees of freedom are integrated out first, the GWL representation may allow Wilson-line renormalization techniques to be applied to classical spin observables at higher PM orders.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the map $S^{ab}=i\eta^{a}\eta^{b}$ is as direct as claimed, the same classical GWL should reproduce the quadratic-in-spin 2PM observables without new vertices; computing that sector would test the power counting and the neglect of spin-fluctuation loops.
  • The predicted spin-independence of two-graviton soft correlations at next-to-eikonal order could be checked against explicit two-graviton soft limits for fermions, where the scalar double-emission structure should appear unchanged up to single-emission spin factors.
  • Because the classical limit is imposed by rescaling the worldline Grassmann variables, the same formalism might be extendable to higher-spin particles by enlarging the worldline supersymmetry, a direction the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the generalized Wilson line (GWL) approach to gravitational scattering of spinning bodies. In Section 2 the authors derive, from the N=1 supersymmetric worldline model, a soft GWL for spin-1/2 particles (eq. 2.81), treating in detail fermion doubling, px-ordering, and the asymptotic limit of the dressed propagator. The result generalizes the exponentiation of next-to-soft single-emission theorems to an arbitrary number of off-shell soft gravitons, with spin entering only through a single next-to-eikonal vertex. In Section 3 the paper constructs a classical GWL by changing the boundary conditions to a line extending from -infinity to +infinity and by enhancing the scaling of the Grassmann spin variables (eqs. 3.5, 3.14, 3.20, 3.21). The vacuum expectation value of two classical GWLs is then used to compute the conservative eikonal phase at 1PM and 2PM order, reproducing known scalar and linear-in-spin results (eqs. 3.28-3.31). The paper also comments on the relation between the GWL, WQFT, and HEFT formalisms.

Significance. If the classical GWL construction is accepted, the paper provides a compact operator formalism that connects soft factorization with PM observables for spinning bodies and that may open the way to applying Wilson-line renormalization techniques to classical scattering. The soft GWL result, in particular the absence of spin-dependent double-graviton correlations at next-to-eikonal order, is a concrete and falsifiable prediction. The explicit map from Grassmann boundary data to the classical spin tensor is a useful clarification, and the rederivation of the known 1PM and 2PM phases is a genuine validation. The main weakness is that the classical spin power counting in Section 3.2 is assumed rather than derived; this assumption is load-bearing for the classical GWL and therefore limits the strength of the paper's central claim until it is independently justified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.2, eqs. (3.4)-(3.5) and (3.14)-(3.20)] The classical GWL depends crucially on the additional rescaling psi -> sqrt(lambda) psi and on the assertion that all diagrams containing a psi-tilde loop are non-classical and can be discarded. This is presented as a power-counting prescription rather than derived from a systematic hbar expansion of the soft GWL. In particular, the psi-tilde^a psi-tilde^b term in eq. (3.14) is dropped without a quantitative comparison to the retained double-graviton vertices of eq. (3.20); if that term contributed at the same order, the spin-dependent parts of the classical GWL and of the 2PM phase in eq. (3.31) would change. The agreement with the literature at linear order in spin and at 2PM is a nontrivial check, but it is a single data point and does not by itself fix the power counting for higher PM orders or higher spin multiplicities. I request a direct hbar -> 0 check from the soft GWL, or an equivalent first-principles derivation of the spin scaling, together with a statement of the conditions under which psi-loops are negligible in the classical limit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'we identity the suitable generalization' should read 'we identify the suitable generalization'.
  2. [Section 2.3, eq. (2.81)] The notation fW_p(0, infinity; x_i) is used before the meaning of the arguments (0, infinity) is explained; a brief definition at first use would improve readability.
  3. [Section 3.2, eq. (3.5)] The notation partial_[b h_a]_mu is not standard and should be explicitly defined, since it appears in a load-bearing Lagrangian before the index structure is made clear.
  4. [Section 3.5, eqs. (3.32)-(3.33)] The claimed correspondence with HEFT amplitudes is schematic: A_HEFT_3 and A_HEFT_4 are not defined, and the equalities are not derived or checked against the explicit 2PM results of Section 3.4. If the matching is not completed, these relations should be labeled as a conjecture or an expectation rather than a proven equivalence.
  5. [Section 3.3, eq. (3.21)] The shorthand 'hat delta(x)' is used for the delta function before it is defined; the definition should appear earlier or immediately at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spin-dependent GWLs are derived from the N=1 supersymmetric worldline action with no fitted parameters, and the 2PM observables are checked against independent literature results.

full rationale

The central derivations are self-contained rather than circular. The soft spin-1/2 GWL in eq. (2.81) is obtained by evaluating the path-integral representation of the LSZ-truncated dressed Dirac propagator, eqs. (2.64)-(2.65), built from the standard N=1 supersymmetric worldline action in a curved background. The only spin-dependent vertex, eq. (2.79), follows from the explicit spin-connection coupling in the worldline Lagrangian, and the symbol map i eta^a eta^b -> sigma^{ab} is a conventional identification, not a fit to the final observables. The classical GWL in eqs. (3.20)-(3.21) is obtained from the same Lagrangian by the stated classical power counting psi -> sqrt(lambda) psi and by changing the worldline boundary conditions, encoded in G_cl = |t-s|/2; neither ingredient is tuned to reproduce the 2PM results. The validation step compares the computed eikonal phases, eqs. (3.28)-(3.31), with independent calculations in refs. [22,104-107], which is an external benchmark rather than an input. Self-citations to ref. [13] provide the scalar baseline and the earlier GWL framework, but the spin-dependent extension and the two-graviton spin correlations are derived here. The classical spin scaling is a physical assumption whose correctness can be questioned, but that is a correctness or validity concern, not a circularity concern, because the target 2PM spin observables are not used as inputs anywhere in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation introduces no new particles, forces, or fitted parameters. It relies on the standard supersymmetric worldline model, a spin map, and power-counting assumptions.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The N=1 supersymmetric worldline model describes a massive spin-1/2 particle coupled to gravity.
    Used in Section 2 to define the dressed propagator and derive the GWL.
  • domain assumption The symbol map i eta^a eta^b -> sigma^{ab} (eq. 2.78) and the classical identification i eta^a eta^b = S^{ab} (eq. 3.3).
    Relates worldline Grassmann boundary data to the spin tensor.
  • ad hoc to paper In the classical limit, spin variables are rescaled as psi -> sqrt(lambda) psi and psi loops are non-classical.
    Section 3.2 power counting; if wrong, the classical GWL would change.
  • domain assumption The classical limit of the scattering amplitude corresponds to the strict Regge limit, where the PM expansion matches the soft expansion.
    Section 3.1; underpins the identification of the eikonal phase from GWL VEVs.
  • domain assumption The time-symmetric Green function G_cl = |t-s|/2 (eq. 3.10) governs the classical worldline correlators.
    Replaces the soft Green function; motivated by the uninterrupted worldline from -infinity to +infinity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRE6TXTF

@misc{pith2026241216049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRE6TXTF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16049}
}
abstract

A generalization of Wilson line operators at subleading power in the soft expansion has been recently introduced as an efficient building block of gravitational scattering amplitudes for non-spinning objects. The classical limit in this picture corresponds to the strict Regge limit, where the Post-Minkowskian (PM) expansion corresponds to the soft expansion, interpreted as a sum over correlations of soft emissions. Building on the well-studied worldline model with ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetry, in this work we extend the generalized Wilson line (GWL) approach to the case of spinning gravitating bodies. Specifically, at the quantum level we derive from first-principles a representation for the spin $1/2$ GWL that is relevant for the all-order factorization of next-to-soft gravitons with fermionic matter, thus generalizing the exponentiation of single-emission next-to-soft theorems. At the classical level, we identity the suitable generalization of Wilson line operators that enables the generation of classical spin observables at linear order in spin. Thanks to the crucial role played by the soft expansion, the map from Grassmann variables to classical spin is manifest. We also comment on the relation between the GWL approach and the Worldline Quantum Field Theory as well as the Heavy Mass Effective Theory formalism. We validate the approach by rederiving known results in the conservative sector at 2PM order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16049 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagrams contributing to the eikonal phase at 1PM. Dots represent spin ver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Diagrams contributing to the 2PM eikonal phase. Dots represent spin vertices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects

    hep-th 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First computation of the O(G^3 S^2) momentum-space gravitational waveform for two scattering spinning black holes, plus the leading three-body spinning waveform.

  2. First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The O(G^3) conservative and radiation-reaction classical observables for spinning black-hole scattering are extended to quartic order in spin, with all-order-in-spin radiation reaction beyond the aligned-spin limit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Resummation of large infrared corrections using Wilson loops,

    G. P. Korchemsky and G. Marchesini, “Resummation of large infrared corrections using Wilson loops,” Phys. Lett. B313 (1993) 433–440

    1993

  2. [2]

    Back-To-Back Jets in QCD,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Back-To-Back Jets in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B193 (1981) 381. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 213, 545 (1983)]

    1981

  3. [3]

    An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, “An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,” Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 114020, hep-ph/0011336. 40

    arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    Soft-collinear gravity,

    M. Beneke and G. Kirilin, “Soft-collinear gravity,” JHEP 09 (2012) 066, 1207.4926

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Soft collinear effective theory and heavy to light currents beyond leading power,

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann, “Soft collinear effective theory and heavy to light currents beyond leading power,” Nucl. Phys. B643 (2002) 431–476, hep-ph/0206152

    arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Soft Theorems from Effective Field Theory,

    A. J. Larkoski, D. Neill, and I. W. Stewart, “Soft Theorems from Effective Field Theory,” JHEP 06 (2015) 077, 1412.3108

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Soft-collinear gravity with fermionic matter,

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and D. Schwienbacher, “Soft-collinear gravity with fermionic matter,” JHEP 03 (2023) 076, 2212.02525

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B828 (2010) 317–374, 0807.1095

    arXiv 2010

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,

    S. Caron-Huot, “Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,” JHEP 07 (2011) 058, 1010.1167

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Path integral approach to eikonal and next-to-eikonal exponentiation,

    E. Laenen, G. Stavenga, and C. D. White, “Path integral approach to eikonal and next-to-eikonal exponentiation,” JHEP 03 (2009) 054, 0811.2067

    2009 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Asymptotic dynamics on the worldline for spinning particles,

    D. Bonocore, “Asymptotic dynamics on the worldline for spinning particles,” JHEP 02 (2021) 007, 2009.07863

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Factorization Properties of Soft Graviton Amplitudes,

    C. D. White, “Factorization Properties of Soft Graviton Amplitudes,” JHEP 05 (2011) 060, 1103.2981

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Classical and quantum gravitational scattering with Generalized Wilson Lines,

    D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza, and J. Pirsch, “Classical and quantum gravitational scattering with Generalized Wilson Lines,” JHEP 03 (2022) 147, 2112.02009

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP 02 (2019) 137, 1811.10950

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,” JHEP 11 (2020) 106, 2006.01184

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dynamics of Binary Systems to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Dynamics of Binary Systems to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,” 2106.08276

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 2, 024041, 2102.08339

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Radiated momentum in the post-Minkowskian worldline approach via reverse unitarity,

    M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi, “Radiated momentum in the post-Minkowskian worldline approach via reverse unitarity,” JHEP 11 (2021) 228, 2110.10140. 41

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung with Tidal Effects in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung with Tidal Effects in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 12, 121101, 2204.06556

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion,

    M. M. Riva, F. Vernizzi, and L. K. Wong, “Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 4, 044013, 2205.15295

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 02 (2021) 048, 2010.02865

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    SUSY in the sky with gravitons,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “SUSY in the sky with gravitons,” JHEP 01 (2022) 027, 2109.04465

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Conservative scattering of spinning black holes at fourth post-Minkowskian order,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, “Conservative scattering of spinning black holes at fourth post-Minkowskian order,” 2306.01714

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Waveforms from amplitudes,

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell, “Waveforms from amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 5, 056007, 2107.10193

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Light bending from eikonal in worldline quantum field theory,

    F. Bastianelli, F. Comberiati, and L. de la Cruz, “Light bending from eikonal in worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 02 (2022) 209, 2112.05013

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Classical Double Copy of Spinning Worldline Quantum Field Theory,

    F. Comberiati and C. Shi, “Classical Double Copy of Spinning Worldline Quantum Field Theory,” JHEP 04 (2023) 008, 2212.13855

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Classical off-shell currents,

    F. Comberiati and L. de la Cruz, “Classical off-shell currents,” JHEP 03 (2023) 068, 2212.09259

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gravitational quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework,

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, “Gravitational quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework,” JHEP 07 (2023) 128, 2210.09176

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gravitational dynamics at O(G6): perturbative gravitational scattering meets experimental mathematics,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Laporta, and P. Mastrolia, “Gravitational dynamics at O(G6): perturbative gravitational scattering meets experimental mathematics,” 2008.09389

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, “Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019), no. 23, 231104, 1909.02375

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, “Binary dynamics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,” Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 2, 024062, 2003.11891. 42

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach: potential contributions,

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, “The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach: potential contributions,” Nucl. Phys. B965 (2021) 115352, 2010.13672

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme,

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, “Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme,” JHEP 09 (2015) 219, 1501.04956

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    N 3LO gravitational spin-orbit coupling at order G 4,

    M. Levi, A. J. Mcleod, and M. Von Hippel, “N 3LO gravitational spin-orbit coupling at order G 4,” JHEP 07 (2021) 115, 2003.02827

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    N 3LO spin-orbit interaction via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects,

    J.-W. Kim, M. Levi, and Z. Yin, “N 3LO spin-orbit interaction via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects,” JHEP 05 (2023) 184, 2208.14949

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Classical worldlines from scattering amplitudes,

    Z. Capatti and M. Zeng, “Classical worldlines from scattering amplitudes,” 2412.10864

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes,

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola, and C. D. White, “The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes,” JHEP 06 (2024) 181, 2112.07556

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,” JHEP 11 (2019) 070, 1908.10308

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, “The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,” JHEP 09 (2023) 059, 2306.11454

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Schwarzschild Metric from Scattering Amplitudes to All Orders in GN,

    S. Mougiakakos and P. Vanhove, “Schwarzschild Metric from Scattering Amplitudes to All Orders in GN,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 11, 111601, 2405.14421

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018), no. 25, 251101, 1808.02489

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    From Boundary Data to Bound States,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From Boundary Data to Bound States,” JHEP 01 (2020) 072, 1910.03008

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist),

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist),” JHEP 02 (2020) 120, 1911.09130

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Conservative and radiative dynamics in classical relativistic scattering and bound systems,

    M. V. S. Saketh, J. Vines, J. Steinhoff, and A. Buonanno, “Conservative and radiative dynamics in classical relativistic scattering and bound systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.4 (2022), no. 1, 013127, 2109.05994. 43

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Boundary to bound dictionary for generic Kerr orbits,

    R. Gonzo and C. Shi, “Boundary to bound dictionary for generic Kerr orbits,” Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 8, 084065, 2304.06066

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    From boundary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin, and R. A. Porto, “From boundary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,” JHEP 04 (2022) 154, 2112.03976. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 002 (2022)]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,

    R. Gonzo and C. Shi, “Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 22, 221401, 2405.09687

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    High-energy scattering in QCD and cross singularities of Wilson loops,

    I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, “High-energy scattering in QCD and cross singularities of Wilson loops,” Nucl. Phys. B437 (1995) 127–162, hep-ph/9409446

    1995 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Evolution equation for gluon Regge trajectory,

    I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, “Evolution equation for gluon Regge trajectory,” Phys. Lett. B387 (1996) 346–354, hep-ph/9607229

    1996 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Celestial soft dressings from generalised Wilson lines,

    K. Nguyen, A. Rios Fukelman, and C. D. White, “Celestial soft dressings from generalised Wilson lines,” PoS CORFU2022 (2023) 289, 2304.01250

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Wilson line approach to gravity in the high energy limit,

    S. Melville, S. Naculich, H. Schnitzer, and C. White, “Wilson line approach to gravity in the high energy limit,” Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 2, 025009, 1306.6019

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Next-to-soft corrections to high energy scattering in QCD and gravity,

    A. Luna, S. Melville, S. Naculich, and C. White, “Next-to-soft corrections to high energy scattering in QCD and gravity,” JHEP 01 (2017) 052, 1611.02172

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Towards an S-matrix description of gravitational collapse,

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Towards an S-matrix description of gravitational collapse,” JHEP 02 (2008) 049, 0712.1209

    2008 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Infrared features of gravitational scattering and radiation in the eikonal approach,

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, and G. Veneziano, “Infrared features of gravitational scattering and radiation in the eikonal approach,” Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 6, 066008, 1812.08137

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation at O(G3),

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation at O(G3),” JHEP 07 (2021) 169, 2104.03256

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,” Phys. Lett. B818 (2021) 136379, 2101.05772

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Classical vs quantum eikonal scattering and its causal structure,

    B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella, and M. M. Riva, “Classical vs quantum eikonal scattering and its causal structure,” JHEP 04 (2023) 023, 2211.00085

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,” 2106.10256. 44

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 20, 201103, 2101.12688

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,” Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104029, hep-th/0409156

    2006 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020), no. 26, 261103, 2007.04977

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory approach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,

    G. K¨ alin, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, “Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory approach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,” JHEP 01 (2023) 140, 2207.00580

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Effective field theories of gravity and compact binary dynamics: A Snowmass 2021 whitepaper,

    W. D. Goldberger, “Effective field theories of gravity and compact binary dynamics: A Snowmass 2021 whitepaper,” in Snowmass 2021. 6, 2022. 2206.14249

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach I: Regularized Lagrangian,

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach I: Regularized Lagrangian,” Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 2, 024047, 1903.05113

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order,

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, “Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019), no. 24, 241605, 1902.10571

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach,

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, “The fifth-order post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach,” Nucl. Phys. B983 (2022) 115900, 2110.13822. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 985, 115991 (2022)]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    The 6th post-Newtonian potential terms at O(G4 N ),

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, “The 6th post-Newtonian potential terms at O(G4 N ),” Phys. Lett. B816 (2021) 136260, 2101.08630

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, “Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024), no. 9, 091402, 2308.14832

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, “Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory,” JHEP 10 (2024) 005, 2406.14770

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    The gluon jet function at two-loop order,

    T. Becher and G. Bell, “The gluon jet function at two-loop order,” Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 252–258, 1008.1936. 45

    2011 arXiv

  63. [71]

    First Subleading Power Resummation for Event Shapes,

    I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, G. Vita, and H. X. Zhu, “First Subleading Power Resummation for Event Shapes,” JHEP 08 (2018) 013, 1804.04665

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power,

    M. Beneke, A. Broggio, M. Garny, S. Jaskiewicz, R. Szafron, L. Vernazza, and J. Wang, “Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power,” JHEP 03 (2019) 043, 1809.10631

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Diagrammatic resummation of leading-logarithmic threshold effects at next-to-leading power,

    N. Bahjat-Abbas, D. Bonocore, J. Sinninghe Damst´ e, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza, and C. White, “Diagrammatic resummation of leading-logarithmic threshold effects at next-to-leading power,” JHEP 11 (2019) 002, 1905.13710

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Renormalization of the next-to-leading-power γγ → h and gg → h soft quark functions,

    M. Beneke, Y. Ji, and X. Wang, “Renormalization of the next-to-leading-power γγ → h and gg → h soft quark functions,” JHEP 05 (2024) 246, 2403.17738

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,” JHEP 09 (2019) 056, 1812.06895

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,” Phys. Lett. B843 (2023) 138049, 2210.12118

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Logarithmic soft theorems and soft spectra,

    F. Alessio, P. Di Vecchia, and C. Heissenberg, “Logarithmic soft theorems and soft spectra,” JHEP 11 (2024) 124, 2407.04128

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,

    Z. Liu, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, “Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,” JHEP 06 (2021) 012, 2102.10059

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, “Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,” JHEP 09 (2023) 183, 2307.04746

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,

    F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023), no. 2, 021601, 2205.07357

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S1∞S2∞),

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S1∞S2∞),” Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 2, 024050, 2304.13740

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S ∞),

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S ∞),” Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 14, 141102, 2205.02809

    2022 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),” Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023), no. 20, 201402, 2203.06202. 46

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part I,

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, “Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part I,” JHEP 03 (2023) 136, 2107.10179

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II,

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, “Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II,” JHEP 05 (2023) 211, 2212.07965

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,

    L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, “Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,” 2410.23271

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Covariant Compton Amplitudes in Gravity with Classical Spin,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, “Covariant Compton Amplitudes in Gravity with Classical Spin,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024), no. 19, 191603, 2309.11249

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Wave Equations for Arbitrary Spin From Quantization of the Extended Supersymmetric Spinning Particle,

    P. S. Howe, S. Penati, M. Pernici, and P. K. Townsend, “Wave Equations for Arbitrary Spin From Quantization of the Extended Supersymmetric Spinning Particle,” Phys. Lett. B215 (1988) 555–558

    1988

  81. [89]

    Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators,

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, “Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators,” 2411.08176

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Bonocore, A

    D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza, and J. Pirsch in preparation

  83. [91]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” 1404.4091

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Soft-Collinear Gravity and Soft Theorems,

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and R. Szafron, “Soft-Collinear Gravity and Soft Theorems,” Handbook of Quantum Gravity(2023) 2210.09336

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, “Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,” JHEP 10 (2021) 118, 2108.04216

    2021 arXiv

  86. [94]

    One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,” JHEP 06 (2023) 048, 2303.06111

    2023 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, “Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,” JHEP 02 (2024) 026, 2310.04405

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    dimensional regularization for N=1 supersymmetric sigma models and the worldline formalism,

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, and A. Zirotti, “dimensional regularization for N=1 supersymmetric sigma models and the worldline formalism,” Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 104009, hep-th/0211134

    2003 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Bastianelli and P

    F. Bastianelli and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Path integrals and anomalies in curved space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2006. 47

    2006

  90. [98]

    One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint,

    F. Bastianelli and R. Bonezzi, “One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint,” JHEP 07 (2013) 016, 1304.7135

    2013 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Worldline path integrals for the graviton,

    F. Bastianelli and M. D. Paciarini, “Worldline path integrals for the graviton,” Class. Quant. Grav.41 (2024), no. 11, 115002, 2305.06650

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Worldline master formulas for the dressed electron propagator, part 1: Off-shell amplitudes,

    N. Ahmadiniaz, V. Banda Guzm´ an, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. Edwards, and C. Schubert, “Worldline master formulas for the dressed electron propagator, part 1: Off-shell amplitudes,” 2004.01391

    2004 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Worldline path integral for the massive Dirac propagator: A four-dimensional approach,

    C. Alexandrou, R. Rosenfelder, and A. W. Schreiber, “Worldline path integral for the massive Dirac propagator: A four-dimensional approach,” Phys. Rev. A59 (1999) 1762–1776, hep-th/9809101

    1999 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Worldline formalism in a gravitational background,

    F. Bastianelli and A. Zirotti, “Worldline formalism in a gravitational background,” Nucl. Phys. B642 (2002) 372–388, hep-th/0205182

    2002 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,

    B. Maybee, D. O’Connell, and J. Vines, “Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,” JHEP 12 (2019) 156, 1906.09260

    2019 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Universality of ultra-relativistic gravitational scattering,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “Universality of ultra-relativistic gravitational scattering,” Phys. Lett. B811 (2020) 135924, 2008.12743

    2020 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G,

    T. Damour, “Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G,” Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 12, 124008, 2010.01641

    2020 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Tidal effects for spinning particles,

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Tidal effects for spinning particles,” JHEP 03 (2021) 097, 2012.05256

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 17, 171601, 2101.07254. 48

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.