Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Classification of kink clusters for scalar fields in dimension 1+1

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every kink n-cluster converges to the same explicit Toda asymptotics: after modulation, $a_{k+1}(t)-a_k(t) \to 2\log(\kappa t)-\log(M k(n-k)/2)$ and $t v_k(t)\to -(n+1-2k)$.

desk verdict A serious gap in the error estimates behind Theorem 1: the proof of Lemma 6.4 is incomplete as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16274 v1 pith:7MWOWO5G submitted 2024-12-20 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Jacek Jendrej , Andrew Lawrie This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35L7135B4037K40
keywords kinkclustersmultikinkdynamicsscalarfieldequationsTodasystemmodulationmethodtopologicalmanifolduniversalprofilesparabolicmotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Kink clusters are the solutions of a 1+1 scalar field theory whose energy is exactly $n$ times the mass of one kink and which, for large times, look like $n$ well-separated alternating kinks and antikinks moving with speeds tending to zero. This paper proves that every such cluster has the same leading-order fate, determined by an attractive Toda lattice with no free parameters: the gaps between neighbouring kinks grow as $2\log(\kappa t)-\log(M k(n-k)/2)$, and the $k$-th velocity decays as $-(n+1-2k)/t$. It then shows that any sufficiently separated initial positions can be realized by some kink cluster, that the set of all clusters is an $n$-dimensional topological manifold parameterized by positions, and that clusters are universal profiles for the formation or collapse of multikink configurations. The result is new even for the integrable sine-Gordon equation, where explicit clusters exist for small $n$.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the modulation method: the field is decomposed as $\varphi(t)=H(\vec a(t),\vec v(t))+g(t)$ with unique parameters satisfying orthogonality to the symplectic symmetries (Lemma 1.5), and the error $g$ is controlled by coercivity of the linearized energy. The PDE then reduces to approximate Newtonian motion for localized momenta $p_k(t)$ (Lemma 4.7): $|M v_k-p_k|\le C\rho$ and $|p'_k-F_k(\vec a)|\le C\rho|\log\rho|$, where $F_k=2\kappa^2(e^{-y_k}-e^{-y_{k-1}})$ is the nearest-neighbour attractive force. Dropping the error terms gives the attractive Toda system (1.25); its explicit parabolic solution (1.26) is the asymptotic law, and a no-return lemma for the projected variables rules out other limits. Existence uses the Poincaré–Miranda fixed-point theorem plus an ejection/compactness argument, while uniqueness uses Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction whose linearized problem is diagonalized by Legendre vectors, yielding a contraction on perturbation trajectories.

What would settle it

Take the sine-Gordon equation, where kink clusters for $n=2$ and $3$ can be written explicitly, and at large times measure the gap $a_2(t)-a_1(t)$ and the velocity $v_1(t)$. The prediction is $a_2-a_1=2\log(\kappa t)-\log(M/2)+o(1)$ and $t v_1\to -1$; any logarithmic-in-time deviation or different constant falsifies Theorem 1. A fully numerical test with a non-integrable potential $U$ comparing cluster trajectories to (1.17) would serve the same purpose.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1 (equation (1.17)): for any kink $n$-cluster $\varphi$, once the modulation parameters $\vec a(t)=(a_1,\dots,a_n)$ and $\vec v(t)=(v_1,\dots,v_n)$ are fixed by the orthogonality conditions (1.15), one has $$\lim_{t\to\infty}\Big[\max_{k}|(a_{k+1}-a_k)-(2\log(\kappa t)-\log(Mk(n-k)/2))|+\max_k|t v_k+(n+1-2k)|+t\|\varphi(t)-H(\vec a(t),\vec v(t))\|_{$H^{1}$\times $L^{2}$}\Big]=0.$$ Thus every cluster, regardless of how it was prepared, approaches the same explicit parabolic solution of the attractive Toda system with interaction coupling $\kappa$ and kink mass $M$. The same machinery yields existence of a cluster with any prescribed widely separated initial positions, uniqueness and continuous dependence near the asymptotic configuration, the manifold structure of the cluster set, and the characterization of clusters as universal profiles of multikink collapse.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the PDE dynamics is faithfully captured, up to exponentially small errors, by the approximate ODE for the modulation parameters: the localized momenta satisfy $|M v_k-p_k|\le C\rho$ and $|p'_k-F_k(\vec a)|\le C\rho|\log\rho|$ (Lemma 4.7). If this forcing law failed at any order, the universal asymptotics of Theorem 1 and the ejection property behind Theorems 2 and 4 would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every kink $n$-cluster approaches the same explicit configuration: $a_{k+1}-a_k\sim 2\log(\kappa t)-\log(Mk(n-k)/2)$ and $v_k\sim-(n+1-2k)/t$, so no fine-tuning of initial velocities is needed to identify the cluster's fate.
  • Any given set of $n$ well-separated initial positions is realized by some kink cluster, giving a complete existence theory at large separation.
  • The collection of all kink $n$-cluster initial data is a topological manifold of dimension $n$, locally parameterized by the kink positions, and every cluster eventually enters this local manifold.
  • Kink clusters are universal profiles: any sequence of solutions entering a small neighborhood of the infinitely separated multikink state must, while still outside, be close to a superposition of separated kink clusters.
  • For clusters satisfying the local uniqueness condition, the error term decays faster than $t^{-\gamma}$ for every $\gamma<2$, and the trajectory parameters obey $t^2(|a'_1-v|+|v'_1|)<\infty$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the parametric rigidity of the asymptotics suggests that kink clusters near their limit may be governed by the conserved quantities of the Toda hierarchy; exploiting them could produce explicit higher-order corrections that numerical clusters could test.
  • The paper leaves smoothness of the manifold $M_n$ open, noting that a full non-self-intersection proof in a neighborhood of the multikink family is missing; upgrading the topological manifold to a smooth invariant manifold is a concrete next step.
  • The paper does not address the $t\to-\infty$ kink-collision problem; an editorial extension is that the time-reversed cluster family should serve as the unstable manifold whose elements are the universal profiles of kink collisions.
  • For $n>2$, the universal-profile theorem suggests that multikink collapse can partially split into smaller subclusters; a testable extension is to classify which subsets of neighbouring kinks coalesce by analyzing the separation limits in Theorem 4.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the real scalar field equation in 1+1 dimensions with an even double-well potential and develops a full dynamical classification of kink n-clusters, defined as minimal-energy solutions containing n transitions between the two vacua. The main theorem gives a parameter-free leading-order asymptotic formula for every n-cluster, showing that the kink positions and velocities converge to the explicit attractive Toda solution at rate t^{-1} and t^{-2} respectively. The paper also constructs kink n-clusters with prescribed large initial separations, proves that the set of kink n-clusters is an n-dimensional topological manifold, and shows that kink clusters are universal profiles for multikink formation and collapse. The proof combines modulation theory, a reduction to an n-body system with exponential interactions, an ODE analysis of parabolic motions, a Poincaré-Miranda argument, and a Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction; the claimed results are substantial and, if correct, constitute a major advance in the rigorous understanding of multisoliton dynamics in the strongly interacting regime.

Significance. The results are significant: Theorem 1 provides an explicit, parameter-free asymptotic law for all kink n-clusters, and Theorems 2-4 establish existence, classification, and universality for arbitrary n. The reduction to the attractive Toda system is conceptually central and, modulo the technical gap described below, is derived rather than assumed. The paper also contains several genuinely useful technical tools, including the localized-momentum estimates, the ejection property, and the Lyapunov-Schmidt scheme with weighted norms. The main concern is that one error estimate used in the core ODE analysis is not justified by the stated lemmas, and that estimate is load-bearing for the proof of Theorem 1 and for the related ejection arguments used in Theorems 2 and 4.

major comments (1)
  1. [§6, Eq. (6.8); Lemma 4.7; Lemma 6.4] The error term in equation (6.8) does not follow from Lemmas 2.8 and 4.7, and the gap is load-bearing. Lemma 4.7 (4.25) gives |p'_k - F_k(a)| ≤ C ρ |log ρ|. Under the bounds of Section 6, ρ is comparable to e^{-y_min} (by (4.22), (6.5), and the definition ρ = Σ e^{-y_k} + Σ v_k^2), so the Lemma 4.7 error is O(y_min e^{-y_min}). After forming q_k = M^{-1}(p_{k+1} - p_k), the error in q' is likewise O(y_min e^{-y_min}), which is larger than the claimed O(y_min^{-1} e^{-y_min}) by a factor y_min^2. Lemma 2.8 contributes only O(y_min e^{-2y_min}) to each F_k and cannot remove the ρ|logρ| contribution. This is not a cosmetic discrepancy: in Lemma 6.4 the derivative of β is estimated as β' = -Σ q_k^2 e^{-y_k} - A^2 e^{-y}·Δ e^{-y} + O(y_min^{-1} e^{-2y_min}). The negative terms are of size e^{-2y_min}, so the stated error permits monotonicity, but with a genuine O(y_min e^{-2y_min}) error the positive term dominates for large y_min and the Lyapunov argument fails. Since Lemma 6.4 supplies the lower bound y_min ≥ 2 log t - C that is used in Proposition 6.9 and Theorem 1, the proof of the main asymptotic theorem is incomplete unless a stronger version of Lemma 4.7, or a different estimate for q', is proved. The same β argument is reused in Lemma 7.3 and in Section 8, so Theorems 2 and 4 inherit this issue.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1.2] The abstract says kink n-clusters are the solutions of minimal possible energy containing 'n-1 transitions between the vacua', but Definition 1.1 and the rest of the paper consistently use n transitions; this appears to be a typo.
  2. [Eq. (4.26)] In the long formula in the proof of Lemma 4.7, the term written as 'xBxχkBxg, Bxgy' appears to have a typographical inconsistency with the neighboring terms; it should likely be 'xχ_k B_x g, B_x g y' or a similarly corrected expression.
  3. [Remark 4.8] The remark refers to '(approximate) Newton's second law', which is helpful; a short pointer to the fact that Lemma 4.7 is later used in a stronger form in Section 6 would alert the reader to the need for the refined estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the asymptotic constants are computed from the potential U and the n-body reduction is derived with error estimates, not fitted.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Theorem 1's constants κ (1.16) and M (2.11) are computed from the potential U and the kink profile H; they are not fitted to kink-cluster dynamics. Lemma 2.8 obtains F_k = 2κ²(e^{-y_k} − e^{-y_{k-1}}) from Proposition 2.1's asymptotic expansion of H, which is proved in the paper. Lemma 4.7 derives the approximate Newton law (4.24)-(4.25) for localized momenta via the modulation equations, with explicit error terms, and the ODE analysis in Section 6 proves the parabolic asymptotics (6.23) without importing the conclusion of Theorem 1. Theorem 2 constructs clusters by a Poincaré-Miranda argument and weak limits, and Theorem 3 proves uniqueness via Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction and contraction. The paper does cite the authors' prior work [26] for auxiliary estimates such as the exponential-integral bounds in Lemma 2.3, the coercivity estimate in Lemma 2.12, and the first-order kink expansion recalled in Proposition 2.1; these are supporting technical inputs, not equivalent to the target asymptotic formulas, and they do not determine the classification conclusions by themselves. The skeptical concern about Lemma 4.7's error rate versus equation (6.8) is a possible technical gap in the estimates, not a circular reduction of the theorem to its own inputs. Overall, no prediction or classification result in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, to a renamed known result, or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the kink dynamics: κ is defined from U by (1.16), M by (2.11), and all asymptotic constants are derived. The proof relies on standard functional-analytic tools, on prior published lemmas from [26], and on the explicit domain assumptions on U. No new physical entities are introduced; the asymptotic multikink state H^∞_n is a limit point, not a new object.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The potential U is even, positive on (-1,1), with U(±1)=0 and U''(±1)=1 (Section 1.1).
    All theorems are stated for this class of potentials, which includes sine-Gordon and phi^4 models.
  • standard math There exists a unique increasing odd kink profile H defined by (2.5) with exponential decay (Proposition 2.1).
    This is derived from the Bogomolny equations under the domain assumptions on U.
  • standard math Coercivity of the linearized operator D²E(H(a,v)) on the orthogonality complement, Proposition 2.14 and Lemmas 2.12-2.13.
    This spectral fact is proved in Section 2.5 using partitions of unity and known results from [26]; it underpins the Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction.
  • standard math Local and global well-posedness of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with finite speed of propagation, Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.3.
    The paper states these standard results and skips or sketches the proofs, referring to [17] and [15]. The Cauchy theory is needed for the construction and comparison arguments in Theorems 2 and 4.
  • standard math Brouwer's fixed point theorem in the form of the Poincaré-Miranda theorem, Theorem 7.1.
    This topological result is the engine behind the existence theorem for prescribed initial positions.
  • standard math Spectral facts for the discrete Dirichlet Laplacian and Perron-Frobenius arguments, Lemmas 6.2 and 6.3.
    These linear algebra results control the asymptotics of the approximate n-body problem in Section 6.
  • domain assumption For Proposition 1.4 only, the potential is restricted to the phi^4 model U(φ)=(1-φ²)²/8 (Section 5.2).
    The characterization of asymptotically static solutions as kink clusters is proved only for this model, as stated in the proposition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of kink clusters for scalar fields in dimension 1+1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7MWOWO5G

@misc{pith2026241216274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of kink clusters for scalar fields in dimension 1+1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7MWOWO5G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16274}
}
abstract

We consider a real scalar field equation in dimension 1+1 with an even, positive self-interaction potential having two non-degenerate zeros (vacua) 1 and -1. Such a model admits non-trivial static solutions called kinks and antikinks. We define a kink n-cluster to be a solution approaching, for large positive times, a superposition of n alternating kinks and antikinks whose velocities converge to $0$. They can be equivalently characterized as the solutions of minimal possible energy containing n transitions between the vacua, or as the solutions whose kinetic energy decays to 0 in large time. Our first main result is a determination of the main-order asymptotic behavior of any kink n-cluster. The proof relies on a reduction,using appropriately chosen modulation parameters, to an n-body problem with attractive exponential interactions. We then construct a kink n-cluster for any prescribed initial positions of the kinks and antikinks, provided that their mutual distances are sufficiently large. Next, we prove that the set of all the kink n-clusters is an n-dimensional topological manifold, and we show how it can be parametrized by the positions of the kinks in the configuration. The proof relies on energy estimates and the contraction mapping principle, using the Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction technique. Finally, we show that kink clusters are universal profiles for the formation/collapse of multikink configurations. In this sense, they can be interpreted as forming the stable/unstable manifold of the multikink state given by a superposition of n infinitely separated alternating kinks and antikinks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V. I. Arnold, V. V. Kozlov, and A. I. Neishtadt. Mathematical Aspects of Classical and Celestial Me- chanics, volume 3 of EMS. Springer, 3rd edition, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and Danchin R. Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equa- tions, volume 343 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    E. B. Bogomolny. The stability of classical solutions. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , 24(4):449–454, 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Chen and J

    G. Chen and J. Jendrej. Kink networks for scalar fields in d imension 1` 1. Nonlinear Anal., 215(112643), 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    G. Chen, J. Liu, and B. Lu. Long-time asymptotics and stab ility for the sine-Gordon equation. Preprint, arXiv:2009.04260, 2020

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Chow and J

    S.-N. Chow and J. K. Hale. Methods of Bifurcation Theory , volume 251 of Grundlehren der mathema- tischen Wissenschaften . Springer, 1982

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    R. Côte. On the soliton resolution for equivariant wave m aps to the sphere. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 68(11):1946–2004, 2015

    work page 1946

  8. [8]

    R. Côte, Y. Martel, and F. Merle. Construction of multi-s oliton solutions for the L2-supercritical gKdV and NLS equations. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 27(1):273–302, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Côte and C

    R. Côte and C. Muñoz. Multi-solitons for nonlinear Klein –Gordon equations. Forum Math. Sigma , 2:e15, 38 pages, 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Côte and H

    R. Côte and H. Zaag. Construction of a multisoliton blow up solution to the semilinear wave equation in one space dimension. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 66(10):1541–1581, 2013. 96 JACEK JENDREJ AND ANDREW LA WRIE

    2013

  3. [11]

    J. M. Delort and N. Masmoudi. Long-Time Dispersive Estimates for Perturbations of a Kink Solution of One-Dimensional Cubic Wave Equations . Memoirs of the European Mathematical Society. EMS Press, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Dunajski and N

    W. Dunajski and N. S. Manton. Reduced dynamics of Ward so litons. Nonlinearity, 18:1677–1689, 2005

    2005

  5. [13]

    Schwartz

    Nelson Dunford and Jacob T. Schwartz. Linear operators. Part III . Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988. Spectral operators, With the as sistance of William G. Bade and Robert G. Bartle, Reprint of the 1971 original, A Wiley-Interscien ce Publication

    1988

  6. [14]

    Duyckaerts and F

    T. Duyckaerts and F. Merle. Dynamics of threshold solut ions for energy-critical wave equation. Int. Math. Res. Pap. IMRP , 2008

    2008

  7. [15]

    K. O. Friedrichs. Symmetric hyperbolic linear differen tial equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 7:345– 392, 1954

    1954

  8. [16]

    Germain and F

    P. Germain and F. Pusateri. Quadratic Klein-Gordon equ ations with a potential in one dimension. Forum Math. Pi , 10:1–172, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Ginibre and G

    J. Ginibre and G. Velo. The global Cauchy problem for the non linear Klein-Gordon equation. Math. Z., 189:487–505, 1985

    1985

  10. [18]

    Gustafson and I

    S. Gustafson and I. M. Sigal. Effective dynamics of magne tic vortices. Adv. Math. , 199:448–498, 2006

    2006

  11. [19]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. I. Naumkin. Quadratic nonlinear Klein -Gordon equation in one dimension. J. Math. Phys., 53(10):103711, 36 pages, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    M. Hénon. Integrals of the Toda lattice. Phys. Rev. B , 9(4):1921–1923, 1974

    1921

  13. [21]

    Henry, J

    D. Henry, J. Perez, and W. Wreszinski. Stability theory for solitary-wave solutions of scalar field equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 85(3):351 – 361, 1982

    1982

  14. [22]

    J. Jendrej. Construction of two-bubble solutions for t he energy-critical NLS. Anal. PDE , 10(8):1923– 1959, 2017

    1923

  15. [23]

    J. Jendrej. Dynamics of strongly interacting unstable two-solitons for generalized Korteweg-de Vries equations. Ann. Inst. Fourier, to appear , arXiv:1802.06294, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J. Jendrej. Nonexistence of radial two-bubbles with op posite signs for the energy-critical wave equation. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , XVIII:1–44, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    J. Jendrej. Construction of two-bubble solutions for e nergy-critical wave equations. Amer. J. Math. , 141(1):55–118, 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    Jendrej, M

    J. Jendrej, M. Kowalczyk, and A. Lawrie. Dynamics of str ongly interacting kink-antikink pairs for scalar fields on a line. Duke Math. J. , 171(18):3643–3705, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Jendrej and A

    J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. Two-bubble dynamics for thres hold solutions to the wave maps equation. Invent. Math. , 213(3):1249–1325, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Jendrej and A

    J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. Soliton resolution for equiva riant wave maps. Preprint, to appear in J. Amer. Math. Soc. , arXiv:2106.10738, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jendrej and A

    J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. An asymptotic expansion of two -bubble wave maps in high equivariance classes. Anal. PDE , 15(2):327–403, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Jendrej and A

    J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. Soliton resolution for the ene rgy-critical nonlinear wave equation in the radial case. arXiv E-Prints , 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Jendrej and A

    J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. Dynamics of kink clusters for s calar fields in dimension 1+1. arXiv E-Prints , 03 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Continuous time solit on resolution for two-bubble equivariant wave maps

    Jacek Jendrej and Andrew Lawrie. Continuous time solit on resolution for two-bubble equivariant wave maps. Math. Res. Lett. , 29(6):1745–1766, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Jia and C

    H. Jia and C. Kenig. Asymptotic decomposition for semil inear wave and equivariant wave map equa- tions. Amer. J. Math. , 139(6):1521–1603, 2017

    2017

  26. [34]

    P. G. Kevrekidis and J. Cuevas-Maraver, editors. A Dynamical Perspective on the φ 4 Model, volume 26 of Nonlinear Systems and Complexity . Springer, 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kowalczyk, Y

    M. Kowalczyk, Y. Martel, and C. Muñoz. Kink dynamics in t he φ 4 model: asymptotic stability for odd perturbations in the energy space. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 30(3):769–798, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Krieger, Y

    J. Krieger, Y. Martel, and P. Raphaël. Two-soliton solu tions to the three-dimensional gravitational Hartree equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 62(11):1501–1550, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Krieger, K

    J. Krieger, K. Nakanishi, and W. Schlag. Center-stable manifold of the ground state in the energy space for the critical wave equation. Math. Ann. , 361(1–2):1–50, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    P. D. Lax. Functional analysis . Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). Wiley-Interscie nce [John Wiley & Sons], New York, 2002. CLASSIFICATION OF KINK CLUSTERS 97

    2002

  31. [39]

    Lührmann and W

    J. Lührmann and W. Schlag. Asymptotic stability of the s ine-Gordon kink under odd perturbations. Preprint, arXiv:2106.09605, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Maderna and A

    E. Maderna and A. Venturelli. Globally minimizing para bolic motions in the newtonian N -body prob- lem. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. , 194:283–313, 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe. Topological solitons. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    2004

  34. [42]

    N. S. Manton, K. Oleś, T. Romańczukiewicz, and A. Weresz czyński. Kink moduli spaces: Collective coordinates reconsidered. Phys. Rev. D , 103(025024), 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Y. Martel. Asymptotic N -soliton-like solutions of the subcritical and critical ge neralized Korteweg-de Vries equations. Amer. J. Math. , 127(5):1103–1140, 2005

    2005

  36. [44]

    Martel, F

    Y. Martel, F. Merle, and P. Raphaël. Blow up for the criti cal gKdV equation I: dynamics near the soliton. Acta Math. , 212(1):59–140, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Martel, F

    Y. Martel, F. Merle, and P. Raphaël. Blow up for the criti cal gKdV equation II: minimal mass dynamics. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 17:1855–1925, 2015

    1925

  38. [46]

    Martel, F

    Y. Martel, F. Merle, and P. Raphaël. Blow up for the criti cal gKdV equation III: exotic regimes. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. , XIV:575–631, 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Martel and P

    Y. Martel and P. Raphaël. Strongly interacting blow up b ubbles for the mass critical NLS. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. , 51(3):701–737, 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    F. Merle. Construction of solutions with exactly k blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearity. Commun. Math. Phys. , 129(2):223–240, 1990

    1990

  41. [49]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Existence and classification of cha racteristic points at blowup for a semi-linear wave equation in one space dimension. Amer. J. Math. , 134(3):581–648, 2012

    2012

  42. [50]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Isolatedness of characteristic po ints at blowup for a 1-dimensional semilinear wave equation. Duke Math. J. , 161(15):2837–2908, 2012

    2012

  43. [51]

    C. Miranda. Un’osservazione su un teorema di Brouwer. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. , 3:5–7, 1940

    1940

  44. [52]

    Moutinho

    A. Moutinho. On the collision problem of two kinks for th e φ 6 model with low speed. Preprint, arXiv:2211.09749, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Moutinho

    A. Moutinho. Dynamics of two interacting kinks for the φ 6 model. Comm. Math. Phys. , 401:1163–1235, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Moutinho

    A. Moutinho. Approximate kink-kink solutions for the φ 6 model in the low-speed limit. Asympt. Anal. , 140(3–4):191–280, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Nakanishi and W

    K. Nakanishi and W. Schlag. Global dynamics above the gr ound state energy for the focusing nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. J. Differential Equations , 250(5):2299–2333, 2011

    2011

  48. [56]

    Nakanishi and W

    K. Nakanishi and W. Schlag. Global dynamics above the gr ound state for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation without a radial assumption. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 203(3):809–851, 2011

    2011

  49. [57]

    T. V. Nguyen. Strongly interacting multi-solitons wit h logarithmic relative distance for the gKdV equation. Nonlinearity, 30(12):4614–4648, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Yu. N. Ovchinnikov and I. M. Sigal. The Ginzburg–Landau equation III. Vortex dynamics. Nonlinearity, 11:1277–1294, 1998

    1998

  51. [59]

    Raphaël and J

    P. Raphaël and J. Szeftel. Existence and uniqueness of m inimal mass blow up solutions to an inhomo- geneous L2-critical NLS. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 24(2):471–546, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics . Academic Press, New York, 1975

    1975

  53. [61]

    D. G. Saari and N. D. Hulkower. On the manifolds of total c ollapse orbits and of completely parabolic orbits for the n-body problem. J. Differential Equations , 41:27–43, 1981

    1981

  54. [62]

    T. H. R. Skyrme. Selected Papers With Commentary of Tony Hilton Royle Skyrme , volume 3. World Scientific, 1994

    1994

  55. [63]

    D. M. A. Stuart. The geodesic approximation for the Yang -Mills-Higgs equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 166:149–190, 1994

    1994

  56. [64]

    M. Toda. Waves in nonlinear lattice. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. , 45:174–200, 1970

    1970

  57. [65]

    Wadati and K

    M. Wadati and K. Ohkuma. Multiple-pole solutions of mod ified Korteweg-de Vries equation. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , 51:2029–2035, 1982. Jacek Jendrej Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu, Sorbonne Université 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France 98 JACEK JENDREJ AND ANDREW LA WRIE je...

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.