Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 74 references

Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry as a diagnostic for questions of fundamental Physics. What we learned from the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE)

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The IXPE X-ray polarimeter can probe fundamental physics by searching for axion-like particles in galaxy clusters.

desk verdict A useful but rough conference review of IXPE's fundamental-physics results; the ALP cluster-polarization sales pitch needs a band-averaged check before being taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17214 v1 pith:Y65PTLSC submitted 2024-12-23 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

Paolo Soffitta , Enrico Costa This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HE
keywords X-raypolarimetryIXPEaxion-likeparticlesgalaxyclustersvacuumbirefringencemagnetarsblackholespinLorentzinvarianceviolation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review makes the case that the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) has turned X-ray polarimetry into a working probe of fundamental physics, not only a tool for studying astrophysical sources. It surveys nearly three years of IXPE results, from vacuum birefringence in magnetars to strong-field general relativity around black holes, neutron-star equations of state, Lorentz-violation searches, and axion-like particles. Its most concrete claim is that a long IXPE pointing on the Perseus or Coma galaxy cluster can detect polarization above 4 percent, whereas the thermal X-ray emission of such clusters should be polarized below 0.1 percent; a detection at that level would be evidence of photon-to-axion conversion in the cluster magnetic field. That makes cluster polarimetry, in the authors' assessment, one of the most promising uses of IXPE for a measurement of fundamental physics.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the ALP-photon oscillation mechanism. In a magnetic field, the component of a photon's polarization parallel to the field can convert into an axion-like particle while the perpendicular component survives, so an initially unpolarized beam acquires linear polarization, and a polarized beam's plane can rotate. The conversion probability is divided into weak- and strong-mixing regimes whose boundaries depend on photon energy, ALP mass and two-photon coupling, plasma frequency, and magnetic-field strength; IXPE's 2–8 keV band falls in the low-energy weak-mixing region, where the probability oscillates strongly with energy but integrates to a significant effect over cluster-scale distances. This is the machinery used to turn galaxy clusters, which should be nearly unpolarized emitters, into detection targets.

What would settle it

A long IXPE observation of Perseus or Coma in the 2–8 keV band settles the case: if the measured polarization is statistically consistent with the <0.1% thermal prediction rather than the simulated >4% distribution, the specific ALP scenario highlighted by the review is excluded for the assumed parameters; a few-percent detection with the expected energy dependence would support photon-axion conversion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that IXPE's 2–8 keV polarimetric window enables an entirely new approach to fundamental physics, both alone and combined with spectra, light curves, and multi-wavelength data. For the cleanest test, the paper adopts ALP parameters $g_{a\gamma\gamma}=0.5\times10^{-11}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$ and $m_a\le10^{-11}\,\mathrm{eV}$; simulations then give a high probability of final linear polarization $\Pi_L$ above 4% at 1 keV and 10 keV for Perseus, with numbers of the same order for Coma, starting from zero initial polarization. The predicted thermal polarization of these cluster X-rays is below 0.1%, so a measured polarization above 4% is attributed to ALP-photon conversion. The review also reports that for blazars the ALP signal is harder to separate from intrinsic variability, which is why clusters are singled out as the preferred target.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the assumed ALP parameters ($g_{a\gamma\gamma}=0.5\times10^{-11}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$, $m_a\le10^{-11}\,\mathrm{eV}$) and the cluster magnetic-field model used in the simulations are representative of reality; if the true coupling is smaller or the fields less organized, the predicted >4% signal falls below IXPE's sensitivity and the cluster test loses its promised reach.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A dedicated long IXPE exposure on Perseus or Coma can detect polarization above 4%, which would be evidence of ALP-photon conversion rather than intrinsic cluster emission.
  • A null or low result would turn the same observation into a limit on the ALP coupling and mass that complements existing searches.
  • For black-hole X-ray binaries, IXPE polarimetry favors high spin ($a_*>0.96$) for 4U 1957+11 and Cyg X-1, while LMC X-3 gives low spin ($\sim0.2$) and 4U 1630-47 requires a geometrically thick disk with mildly relativistic outflows and $a_*\le0.7$.
  • Combining IXPE extragalactic polarization measurements with optical data improves the anisotropic Lorentz-invariance-violation limits by about four orders of magnitude and the isotropic limit by one order.
  • Magnetar observations show distinct polarization behavior per source, but vacuum birefringence is not strictly required by the data; the definitive test would require very high polarization together with a very small pulsed fraction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same ALP-conversion test could be extended to a small sample of bright relaxed clusters, turning a single detection into a statistical measurement of the coupling and field geometry.
  • Beyond the paper: if a few-percent polarization is seen, fitting its energy dependence could separate the ALP coupling from the magnetic-field model; the review does not work out this inversion.
  • Beyond the paper: for magnetars, the review's stated criterion linking high polarization to a very small pulsed fraction suggests a targeted multi-epoch campaign to settle whether vacuum birefringence is really required.
  • Beyond the paper: the polarization-based black-hole spin values, where they agree with continuum fitting, could be used to arbitrate the known disagreement among spin-estimation methods once more sources are observed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper is a conference-proceedings review by two members of the IXPE collaboration. It surveys IXPE results from the first three years of operation that bear on fundamental physics: vacuum polarization and birefringence in magnetars, strong-field general relativity and black-hole spin measurements from X-ray binaries, constraints on the neutron-star equation of state, Lorentz-invariance violation from X-ray polarimetry, and axion/axion-like-particle (ALP) searches. The review concludes that the most promising forward-looking fundamental-physics use of IXPE is the search for ALP-photon conversion in galaxy clusters, where the authors claim that long pointings on Perseus or Coma could detect polarization above 4%.

Significance. The paper provides a useful, compact status report from instrument experts, with qualitative summaries that largely match the cited literature. Its caution on magnetar vacuum birefringence (not strictly necessary) is appropriate and avoids overclaiming. The main value is in organizing the fundamental-physics questions that IXPE can address. However, the paper's most concrete quantitative claim—the >4% cluster polarization from ALPs—is not adequately supported in the text, and because this claim is highlighted in the abstract and Section 3.2 as the most promising new-physics use, it should be either properly substantiated or substantially softened.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Figure 3] Figure 3 presents probability densities for the final polarization degree at 1 keV and 10 keV, but IXPE measures over 2–8 keV. Since the text states that in the weak-mixing regime the conversion probability has high oscillations with energy, the polarization degree and angle measured by IXPE are band-averaged quantities. The two monoenergetic PDFs do not determine the distribution of the band-averaged Stokes parameters, so the sentence 'IXPE with a long pointing can detect polarizations above 4%' is not a logical consequence of the figure. A band-averaged simulation, including the IXPE response, is needed to support the claim.
  2. [§3.2, 'high probability' sentence] The text says the computations for Perseus and Coma predict 'a high probability to find higher values' and that IXPE can detect polarizations above 4%, but it gives neither the cumulative probability that Π_L exceeds 4% nor the exposure time required to reach a 3σ or 99% confidence detection given the clusters' surface brightness. Without these numbers, the reader cannot assess whether the >4% signal is a realistic target or a rare tail of the distribution. Please add the corresponding cumulative probabilities and an IXPE sensitivity estimate, or explicitly state that the detection claim is conditional on a favorable realization.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'ddata' should be 'data'.
  2. [§2.1] The magnetar name '4U 0162+61' appears to be a typo for '4U 0142+61', which is the source in the cited Taverna et al. Science paper.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (2)] The SME vacuum dispersion relation is garbled: the coefficients and parentheses are not properly defined or typeset, making the equation unintelligible as printed.
  4. [§3.1, Eq. (3)] The Stokes evolution equation is incomplete: the vector components of ζ are missing and the text includes the typo '𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ'.
  5. [§3.2, Eq. (4)] The axion-photon coupling relation is dimensionally inconsistent as printed: '2×GeV^{-1}' should presumably be '2×10^{-10} GeV^{-1}' or similar, and the factor ζ is undefined.
  6. [§3.2] The phrase 'In 3 we show' should be 'In Fig. 3'; the same paragraph also contains typos 'not knowna priori' and a duplicated 'and'.
  7. [References] Reference [1] has a truncated arXiv identifier ('arXiv:2112.0126' instead of a complete arXiv number).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No derivation reduces to its inputs; the ALP cluster feasibility claim is an extrapolation with a minor self-citation, not a circular result.

full rationale

This is a review by IXPE mission members, so self-citation is pervasive, but the cited instrument, calibration, and source papers are peer-reviewed and externally falsifiable; they are not used to prove a new result by definition. The one self-citation touching the central forward-looking claim is the ALP cluster computation of Galanti et al. [69], on which E. Costa is a co-author. That computation is a parameter-space simulation with explicitly stated ALP parameters (g_aγγ=0.5e-11 GeV^-1, m_a<=1e-11 eV) and cluster magnetic-field assumptions; it is not fitted to IXPE data, and the resulting >4% polarization prediction is falsifiable by a future long IXPE pointing. Thus the review's central assertion does not reduce to a fitted parameter, a definition, or an unverified self-citation chain. The more serious scientific weakness is non-circular: Figure 3 shows monochromatic probability densities at 1 and 10 keV, while IXPE integrates over 2-8 keV, and the text itself notes that in the low-energy weak-mixing regime the conversion probability has high oscillations with energy. The statement that IXPE can detect polarizations above 4% on Perseus or Coma is therefore an extrapolation from monoenergetic PDFs rather than a band-averaged feasibility demonstration. That is a correctness and robustness concern, not circularity. Score 2 reflects one minor self-citation in an otherwise independent review-level synthesis.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper pulls assumptions and parameters entirely from prior literature. The free parameters are the ALP simulation inputs, which are not fitted by the paper but are load-bearing for the most concrete forward-looking claim. All other axioms are standard working assumptions in the cited fields. No new entities are postulated by this paper.

free parameters (2)
  • g_aγγ (axion-photon coupling) = 0.5 × 10^-11 GeV^-1
    Used as an input in the Perseus/Coma cluster simulations (Section 3.2) to predict detectable ALP-induced polarization. The value is chosen from the allowed range, not derived or fitted by this paper, and the predicted >4% polarization depends on it.
  • m_a (axion mass) = ≤ 10^-11 eV
    Simulation input for the ALP-photon oscillation computations in Section 3.2. The detectability claim for cluster polarization is conditional on this mass range.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption QED vacuum birefringence in strong magnetic fields
    Assumed as the physical mechanism for polarization evolution in magnetar magnetospheres (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Rotating Vector Model for pulsar polarization geometry
    Used in Sections 2.1 and 2.3 to infer magnetic field geometry and constrain neutron star equation of state.
  • domain assumption Novikov-Thorne standard disk model for black hole accretion
    Adopted in Section 2.2 to fit IXPE polarization data and infer black hole spin.
  • domain assumption ALP-photon oscillation mechanism in magnetic fields
    Underpins the predicted polarization signal in galaxy clusters (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption Cluster thermal X-ray emission is initially unpolarized (<0.1%)
    Stated in Section 3.2 to attribute any >4% polarization to ALPs; based on Komarov et al. [70].
  • domain assumption SME framework for Lorentz violation
    Adopted in Section 3.1 to interpret IXPE polarization constraints on Lorentz/CPT violation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry as a diagnostic for questions of fundamental Physics. What we learned from the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y65PTLSC

@misc{pith2026241217214,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry as a diagnostic for questions of fundamental Physics. What we learned from the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y65PTLSC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17214}
}
read the original abstract

X-ray Astrophysics, which addresses extreme physics in extreme conditions, is particularly well suited for answering questions related to known physics. Reversely tiny effects, but integrated along sidereal distances, allow to probe extensions of known physics or even new physics. The new window into polarimetry in this energy band, opened by the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) a NASA-ASI Small Explorer mission launched on 9th December 2021 enables an entirely novel approach, whether used alone or in combination with standard observables such as light curves and spectra and with data in other wavelengths. In this paper, we review IXPE's results after nearly three years of successful operation, focusing on their implications for key questions in Fundamental Physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17214 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The length scale of the electric-field variation of the radiation coming from the neutron star l𝐸 , compared with the length scale of variation of the magnetic field of the magnetosphere of a magnetar l𝐵. at relatively smaller distance from the neutron star the electric-field changes on a very short length scale so it can adapt to the local magnetic field, The polarization of the X-ray beam therefore is frozen. At r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The region below 𝐸𝐿 and above 𝐸𝐻 are those of Weak Coupling. The region in between is that of Strong Coupling. Axion Like Particles (ALP) are predicted by many models extending Standard Model in particular from Superstring and Brane. They resemble Axions but are different in the sense that do not couple with gluons and fermions and the coupling constant and the mass are not related. They are a strong candidate for d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Perseus Cluster. Probability density function for the final degree of linear polarization Π𝐿 at 1 keV (upper panel) and 10 keV (lower panel)[69] In the past it was proposed that if the intergalactic fields ar organized in domains with magnetic fields aligned on a few MPc scale, the photons polarized at the source could be depolarized at the observer. Conversely a significant polarization could be detected from an or… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [69]

    Bassan, A

    N. Bassan, A. Mirizzi, and M. Roncadelli,Axion-like particle effects on the polarization of cosmic high-energy gamma sources, JCAP 5 (May, 2010) 10, [arXiv:1001.5267]

    arXiv 2010

  2. [1]

    M. C. Weisskopf, P. Soffitta, L. Baldini, B. D. Ramsey, S. L. O’Dell, R. W. Romani, G. Matt, W. D. Deininger, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, E. Costa, J. J. Kolodziejczak, L. Latronico, H. L. Marshall, F. Muleri, S. D. Bongiorno, A. Tennant, N. Bucciantini, M. Dovciak, F. Marin, A. Marscher, J. Poutanen, P. Slane, R. Turolla, W. Kalinowski, A. Di Marco...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Soffitta, L

    P. Soffitta, L. Baldini, R. Bellazzini, E. Costa, L. Latronico, F. Muleri, E. Del Monte, S. Fabiani, M. Minuti, M. Pinchera, C. Sgro’, G. Spandre, A. Trois, F. Amici, H. Andersson, P. Attina’, M. Bachetti, M. Barbanera, F. Borotto, A. Brez, D. Brienza, C. Caporale, C. Cardelli, R. Carpentiero, S. Castellano, M. Castronuovo, L. Cavalli, E. Cavazzuti, M. Ce...

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Di Marco, E

    A. Di Marco, E. Costa, F. Muleri, P. Soffitta, S. Fabiani, F. La Monaca, J. Rankin, F. Xie, M. Bachetti, L. Baldini, W. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, A. Brez, S. Castellano, E. Del Monte, N. Di Lalla, R. Ferrazzoli, L. Latronico, S. Maldera, A. Manfreda, S. L. O’Dell, M. Perri, M. Pesce-Rollins, S. Puccetti, B. D. Ramsey, A. Ratheesh, C. Sgrò, G. Spandre, A...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Di Marco, S

    A. Di Marco, S. Fabiani, F. La Monaca, F. Muleri, J. Rankin, P. Soffitta, F. Xie, F. Amici, P. attinà, M. Bachetti, L. Baldini, M. Barbanera, W. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, F. Borotto, A. Brez, D. Brienza, C. Caporale, C. Cardelli, R. Carpentiero, S. Castellano, M. Castronuovo, L. Cavalli, E. Cavazzuti, M. Ceccanti, M. Centrone, S. Citraro, E. Costa, E. D...

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    170, [arXiv:2202.0109]

    work page arXiv

  7. [6]

    Baldini, M

    L. Baldini, M. Barbanera, R. Bellazzini, R. Bonino, F. Borotto, A. Brez, C. Caporale, C. Cardelli, S. Castellano, M. Ceccanti, S. Citraro, N. Di Lalla, L. Latronico, L. Lucchesi, C. Magazzu’, G. Magazzu’, S. Maldera, A. Manfreda, M. Marengo, A. Marrocchesi, P. Mereu, M. Minuti, F. Mosti, H. Nasimi, A. Nuti, C. Oppedisano, L. Orsini, M. Pesce-Rollins, M. P...

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Di Marco, P

    A. Di Marco, P. Soffitta, E. Costa, R. Ferrazzoli, F. La Monaca, J. Rankin, A. Ratheesh, F. Xie, L. Baldini, E. Del Monte, S. R. Ehlert, S. Fabiani, D. E. Kim, F. Muleri, S. L. O’Dell, B.D.Ramsey,A.Rubini,C.Sgrò,S.Silvestri,A.F.Tennant,andM.C.Weisskopf, Handling the Background in IXPE Polarimetric Data, AJ165 (Apr., 2023) 143, [arXiv:2302.0292]. 10 Fundam...

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    A. K. Harding and D. Lai,Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars,Reports on Progress in Physics69(Sept., 2006) 2631–2708, [astro-ph/0606674]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Thompson and R

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan,The Soft Gamma Repeaters as Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars. II. Quiescent Neutrino, X-Ray, and Alfven Wave Emission, ApJ473 (Dec.,

  3. [10]

    J. S. Heyl and N. J. Shaviv,Polarization evolution in strong magnetic fields, MNRAS311 (Jan., 2000) 555–564, [astro-ph/]

    2000

  4. [11]

    Schubert,Vacuum polarisation tensors in constant electromagnetic fields: Part I, Nuclear Physics B585 (Oct., 2000) 407–428, [hep-ph/0001288]

    C. Schubert,Vacuum polarisation tensors in constant electromagnetic fields: Part I, Nuclear Physics B585 (Oct., 2000) 407–428, [hep-ph/0001288]

    2000 arXiv

  5. [12]

    S. Zane, R. Taverna, D. González-Caniulef, F. Muleri, R. Turolla, J. Heyl, K. Uchiyama, M. Ng, T. Tamagawa, I. Caiazzo, N. Di Lalla, H. L. Marshall, M. Bachetti, F. La Monaca, E. Gau, A. Di Marco, L. Baldini, M. Negro, N. Omodei, J. Rankin, G. Matt, G. G. Pavlov, T. Kitaguchi,...

    2023

  6. [13]

    Taverna, R

    R. Taverna, R. Turolla, F. Muleri, J. Heyl, S. Zane, L. Baldini, D. González-Caniulef, M. Bachetti, J. Rankin, I. Caiazzo, N. Di Lalla, V. Doroshenko, M. Errando, E. Gau, D.Kırmızıbayrak,H.Krawczynski,M.Negro,M.Ng,N.Omodei,A.Possenti,T.Tamagawa, K. Uchiyama, M. C. Weisskopf, I...

    2022

  7. [14]

    Caiazzo, S

    J.Heyl,R.Taverna,R.Turolla,G.L.Israel,M.Ng,D.Kırmızıbayrak,D.González-Caniulef, I. Caiazzo, S. Zane, S. R. Ehlert, M. Negro, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, M. Bachetti, L. Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. Bianchi, S. D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, N. Bucciantini, F...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Turolla, R

    R. Turolla, R. Taverna, G. L. Israel, F. Muleri, S. Zane, M. Bachetti, J. Heyl, A. Di Marco, E. Gau, H. Krawczynski, M. Ng, A. Possenti, J. Poutanen, L. Baldini, G. Matt, M. Negro, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. Bianchi, S. D. Bongiorno, R. Bon...

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Einstein,Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Annalen der Physik354 (Jan., 1916) 769–822

    A. Einstein,Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Annalen der Physik354 (Jan., 1916) 769–822

    1916

  10. [17]

    D. Lai,IXPE detection of polarized X-rays from magnetars and photon mode conversion at QED vacuum resonance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science120 (Apr., 2023) e2216534120, [arXiv:2209.1364]

    2023

  11. [18]

    D. M. Lucchesi and R. Peron,Accurate Measurement in the Field of the Earth of the General-Relativistic Precession of the LAGEOS II Pericenter and New Constraints on Non-Newtonian Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (Dec., 2010) 231103, [arXiv:1106.2905]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [19]

    C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  13. [20]

    Lucchesi, M

    D. Lucchesi, M. Visco, R. Peron, M. Bassan, G. Pucacco, C. Pardini, L. Anselmo, and C. Magnafico,A 1% Measurement of the Gravitomagnetic Field of the Earth with Laser-Tracked Satellites,Universe 6 (Aug., 2020) 139

    2020

  14. [21]

    D. M. Lucchesi and R. Peron,LAGEOS II pericenter general relativistic precession (1993-2005): Error budget and constraints in gravitational physics, Phys. Rev. D89 (Apr.,

    1993

  15. [22]

    Lucchesi, M

    D. Lucchesi, M. Visco, C. Lefevre, M. Lucente, F. Santoli, F. Sapio, M. Cinelli, A. Di Marco, E. Fiorenza, P. Loffredo, C. Magnafico, R. Peron, and F. Vespe,Fundamental physics measurements with Galileo FOC satellites and the Galileo for science project. I. A 3D-CAD and a box ...

  16. [23]

    Lucchesi, L

    D. Lucchesi, L. Anselmo, M. Bassan, M. Lucente, C. Magnafico, C. Pardini, R. Peron, G. Pucacco, and M. Visco,Testing Gravitational Theories in the Field of the Earth with the SaToR-G Experiment, Universe 7(June, 2021) 192

    2021

  17. [24]

    Ciufolini, A

    I. Ciufolini, A. Paolozzi, E. C. Pavlis, G. Sindoni, J. Ries, R. Matzner, R. Koenig, C. Paris, V. Gurzadyan, and R. Penrose,An improved test of the general relativistic effect of frame-dragging using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites,European Physical Journal C79 (Oct., 2019) 87...

    2019

  18. [25]

    Ciufolini and E

    I. Ciufolini and E. C. Pavlis,A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense-Thirring effect, Nature431(Oct., 2004) 958–960

    2004

  19. [26]

    Touboul, G

    P. Touboul, G. Métris, M. Rodrigues, J. Bergé, A. Robert, Q. Baghi, Y. André, J. Bedouet, D. Boulanger, S. Bremer, P. Carle, R. Chhun, B. Christophe, V. Cipolla, T. Damour, P. Danto, L. Demange, H. Dittus, O. Dhuicque, P. Fayet, B. Foulon, P.-Y. Guidotti, D. Hagedorn, E. Hardy...

    2022

  20. [27]

    A. M. Nobili, M. Shao, R. Pegna, G. Zavattini, S. G. Turyshev, D. M. Lucchesi, A. De Michele, S. Doravari, G. L. Comandi, T. R. Saravanan, F. Palmonari, G. Catastini, and A. Anselmi,‘Galileo Galilei’ (GG): space test of the weak equivalence principle to 10−17 and laboratory de...

    2012

  21. [28]

    C. S. Reynolds,Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin, ARA&A59(Sept., 2021) 117–154, [arXiv:2011.0894]

    2021

  22. [29]

    A.C.Fabian, M.J.Rees, L.Stella, andN.E.White, X-rayfluorescencefromtheinnerdiscin Cygnus X-1., MNRAS238 (May, 1989) 729–736

    1989

  23. [30]

    R. F. Stark and P. A. Connors,Observational test for the existence of a rotating black hole in CYG X-1, Nature266 (1977) 429

    1977

  24. [31]

    P. A. Connors and R. F. Stark,Observable gravitational effects on polarised radiation coming from near a black hole, Nature269 (Sept., 1977) 128–129

    1977

  25. [32]

    R. C. Reis, A. C. Fabian, R. R. Ross, and J. M. Miller,Determining the spin of two stellar-mass black holes from disc reflection signatures, MNRAS395 (May, 2009) 1257–1264

    2009

  26. [33]

    P. A. Connors, R. F. Stark, and T. Piran,Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes, ApJ235(1980) 224

    1980

  27. [34]

    M. A. Abramowicz and W. Kluźniak,A precise determination of black hole spin in GRO J1655-40, A&A374 (Aug., 2001) L19–L20, [astro-ph/0105077]

    2001 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Shafee, J

    R. Shafee, J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L.-X. Li, and R. A. Remillard, Estimating the Spin of Stellar-Mass Black Holes by Spectral Fitting of the X-Ray Continuum, ApJ 636 (Jan., 2006) L113–L116, [astro-ph/0508302]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Marra, M

    L. Marra, M. Brigitte, N. Rodriguez Cavero, S. Chun, J. F. Steiner, M. Dovčiak, M. Nowak, S. Bianchi, F. Capitanio, A. Ingram, G. Matt, F. Muleri, J. Podgorný, J. Poutanen, J. Svoboda, R. Taverna, F. Ursini, A. Veledina, A. De Rosa, J. A. García, A. A. Lutovinov, I. A. Meremin...

    1957

  30. [37]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne,Astrophysics of black holes., inBlack Holes (Les Astres Occlus) (C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt, eds.), pp. 343–450, Jan., 1973

    1973

  31. [38]

    Barillier, V

    E. Barillier, V. Grinberg, D. Horn, M. A. Nowak, R. A. Remillard, J. F. Steiner, D. J. Walton, and J. Wilms,NICER/NuSTAR Characterization of 4U 1957+11: A Near Maximally Spinning Black Hole Potentially in the Mass Gap, ApJ944 (Feb., 2023) 165, [arXiv:2301.0922]. 15 Fundamental...

    1957

  32. [39]

    J. F. Steiner, E. Nathan, K. Hu, H. Krawczynski, M. Dovčiak, A. Veledina, F. Muleri, J. Svoboda, K. Alabarta, M. Parra, Y. Bhargava, G. Matt, J. Poutanen, P.-O. Petrucci, A. F. Tennant, M. C. Baglio, L. Baldini, S. Barnier, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Bianchi, M. Brigitte, M. Cabezas...

    2024

  33. [40]

    Svoboda, M

    J. Svoboda, M. Dovčiak, J. F. Steiner, F. Muleri, A. Ingram, A. Yilmaz, N. Rodriguez Cavero, L. Marra, J. Poutanen, A. Veledina, M. R. Mojaver, S. Bianchi, J. A. García, P. Kaaret, H. Krawczynski, G. Matt, J. Podgorný, M. C. Weisskopf, F. Kislat, P.-O. Petrucci, M. Brigitte, M...

    2024

  34. [41]

    A. A. Zdziarski, S. Chand, S. Banerjee, M. Szanecki, A. Janiuk, P. Lubiński, A. Niedźwiecki, G. Dewangan, and R. Misra,What Is the Black Hole Spin in Cyg X-1?, ApJ 967 (May, 2024) L9, [arXiv:2402.1232]

    2024

  35. [42]

    J. D. Schnittman and J. H. Krolik,X-ray Polarization from Accreting Black Holes: Coronal Emission, ApJ712 (Apr., 2010) 908–924, [arXiv:0912.0907]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [43]

    J. F. Steiner, J. E. McClintock, J. A. Orosz, R. A. Remillard, C. D. Bailyn, M. Kolehmainen, and O. Straub,The Low-spin Black Hole in LMC X-3, ApJ793 (Oct., 2014) L29, [arXiv:1402.0148]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Poutanen,Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars, A&A641 (Sept., 2020) A166, [arXiv:2006.1044]

    J. Poutanen,Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars, A&A641 (Sept., 2020) A166, [arXiv:2006.1044]

    2020

  38. [45]

    Ratheesh, M

    A. Ratheesh, M. Dovčiak, H. Krawczynski, J. Podgorný, L. Marra, A. Veledina, V. Suleimanov, N. Rodriguez Cavero, J. Steiner, J. Svoboda, A. Marinucci, S. Bianchi, M. Negro, G. Matt, F. Tombesi, J. Poutanen, A. Ingram, R. Taverna, A. West, V. Karas, F. Ursini, P. Soffitta, F. C...

    2023 arXiv

  39. [46]

    A. L. Watts, N. Andersson, D. Chakrabarty, M. Feroci, K. Hebeler, G. Israel, F. K. Lamb, M. C. Miller, S. Morsink, F. Özel, A. Patruno, J. Poutanen, D. Psaltis, A. Schwenk, A. W. Steiner, L. Stella, L. Tolos, and M. van der Klis,Colloquium: Measuring the neutron star equation ...

    2016

  40. [47]

    Nättilä and J

    J. Nättilä and J. J. E. Kajava,Fundamental Physics with Neutron Stars, inHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics(C. Bambi and A. Sangangelo, eds.), p. 30. Springer Singapore, 2022

    2022

  41. [48]

    Viironen and J

    K. Viironen and J. Poutanen,Light curves and polarization of accretion- and nuclear-powered millisecond pulsars, A&A426 (Nov., 2004) 985–997, [astro-ph/]

    2004

  42. [49]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Ludlam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Okajima, G. Prigozhin, a...

    2019

  43. [50]

    Gambini and J

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin,Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999), no. 12 124021, [gr-qc/980]

    1999

  44. [51]

    Papitto, A

    A. Papitto, A. Di Marco, J. Poutanen, T. Salmi, G. Illiano, F. La Monaca, F. Ambrosino, A. Bobrikova, M. C. Baglio, C. Ballocco, L. Burderi, S. Campana, F. Coti Zelati, T. Di Salvo, R. La Placa, V. Loktev, S. Long, C. Malacaria, A. Miraval Zanon, M. Ng, M. Pilia, A. Sanna, L. ...

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    I. G. Mitrofanov,Astrophysics (communication arising): A constraint on canonical quantum gravity?, Nature426 (2003) 139

    2003

  46. [53]

    Coburn and S

    W. Coburn and S. E. Boggs,Polarization of the prompt𝛾-ray emission from the𝛾-ray burst of 6 December 2002, Nature423 (May, 2003) 415–417, [astro-ph/]

    2002

  47. [54]

    A. J. Dean, D. J. Clark, J. B. Stephen, V. A. McBride, L. Bassani, A. Bazzano, A. J. Bird, A. B. Hill, S. E. Shaw, and P. Ubertini,Polarized Gamma-Ray Emission from the Crab, Science 321 (2008) 1183

    2008

  48. [55]

    Kaaret,X-ray clues to viability of loop quantum gravity, Nature427(2004) 287

    P. Kaaret,X-ray clues to viability of loop quantum gravity, Nature427(2004) 287. 17 Fundamental Physics with IXPE Paolo Soffitta and Enrico Costa

    2004

  49. [56]

    M.Kole,N.DeAngelis,F.Berlato,J.M.Burgess,N.Gauvin,J.Greiner,W.Hajdas,H.C.Li, Z. H. Li, A. Pollo, N. Produit, D. Rybka, L. M. Song, J. C. Sun, J. Szabelski, T. Tymieniecka, Y. H. Wang, B. B. Wu, X. Wu, S. L. Xiong, S. N. Zhang, and Y. J. Zhang,The POLAR gamma-ray burst polariza...

    2020

  50. [57]

    Laurent, D

    P. Laurent, D. Götz, P. Binétruy, S. Covino, and A. Fernandez-Soto,Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation using integral/IBIS observations of GRB041219A, Phys. Rev. D83 (June, 2011) 121301, [arXiv:1106.1068]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [58]

    V. A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes,Constraints on Relativity Violations from Gamma-Ray Bursts,Physical Review Letters110 (May, 2013) 201601

    2013

  52. [59]

    J. A. Tomsick, S. E. Boggs, A. Zoglauer, D. Hartmann, M. Ajello, E. Burns, C. Fryer, C. Karwin, C. Kierans, A. Lowell, J. Malzac, J. Roberts, P. Saint-Hilaire, A. Shih, T. Siegert, C. Sleator, T. Takahashi, F. Tavecchio, E. Wulf, J. Beechert, H. Gulick, A. Joens, H. Lazar, E. ...

    2023 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Kislat,Searches for Lorentz-Violating Signals with Astrophysical Polarization Measurements,arXiv e-prints(July, 2019) arXiv:1907.06514, [arXiv:1907.0651]

    F. Kislat,Searches for Lorentz-Violating Signals with Astrophysical Polarization Measurements,arXiv e-prints(July, 2019) arXiv:1907.06514, [arXiv:1907.0651]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [61]

    A. S. Friedman, R. Gerasimov, D. Leon, W. Stevens, D. Tytler, B. G. Keating, and F. Kislat, Improved constraints on anisotropic birefringent Lorentz invariance and C P T violation from broadband optical polarimetry of high redshift galaxies, Phys. Rev. D102 (Aug., 2020) 043008...

    2020

  55. [62]

    Kislat and H

    F. Kislat and H. Krawczynski,Planck-scale constraints on anisotropic Lorentz and C P T invariance violations from optical polarization measurements, Phys. Rev. D95 (Apr., 2017) 083013, [arXiv:1701.0043]

    2017

  56. [63]

    Gerasimov, P

    R. Gerasimov, P. Bhoj, and F. Kislat,New Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation from Combined Linear and Circular Optical Polarimetry of Extragalactic Sources, Symmetry 13 (May, 2021) 880, [arXiv:2104.0023]

    2021

  57. [64]

    Kislat,Constraining Lorentz Invariance Violation Using IXPE Data, inAAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, vol

    F. Kislat,Constraining Lorentz Invariance Violation Using IXPE Data, inAAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, vol. 20 ofAAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, p. 100.72, Sept., 2023

    2023

  58. [65]

    Kislat,Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation from Optical Polarimetry of Astrophysical Objects, Symmetry 10 (Nov., 2018) 596

    F. Kislat,Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation from Optical Polarimetry of Astrophysical Objects, Symmetry 10 (Nov., 2018) 596. 18 Fundamental Physics with IXPE Paolo Soffitta and Enrico Costa

    2018

  59. [66]

    Galanti and M

    G. Galanti and M. Roncadelli,Behavior of axionlike particles in smoothed out domainlike magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D98(Aug., 2018) 043018, [arXiv:1804.0944]

    2018

  60. [67]

    Ayala, I

    A. Ayala, I. Domínguez, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi, and O. Straniero,Revisiting the Bound on Axion-Photon Coupling from Globular Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (Nov., 2014) 191302, [arXiv:1406.6053]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Galanti, M

    G. Galanti, M. Roncadelli, and F. Tavecchio,ALP-induced polarization effects on photons from blazars, Phys. Rev. D108 (Oct., 2023) 083017, [arXiv:2301.0820]

    2023

  62. [70]

    S. V. Komarov, I. I. Khabibullin, E. M. Churazov, and A. A. Schekochihin,Polarization of thermal bremsstrahlung emission due to electron pressure anisotropy, MNRAS461 (Sept.,

  63. [71]

    Galanti, M

    G. Galanti, M. Roncadelli, F. Tavecchio, and E. Costa,ALP induced polarization effects on photons from galaxy clusters, Phys. Rev. D107 (May, 2023) 103007, [arXiv:2202.1228]

    2023

  64. [74]

    Day and S

    F. Day and S. Krippendorf,Searching for Axion-Like Particles with X-ray Polarimeters, Galaxies 6 (Apr., 2018) 45, [arXiv:1801.1055]. 19

    2018

  65. [2016]

    2162–2173, [arXiv:1604.0866]

  66. [2022]

    026002, [arXiv:2112.0126]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.