Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 192 references

On-chip frequency-bin quantum photonics

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This Perspective argues that putting frequency-bin quantum circuits on photonic chips is a necessary, though not sufficient, step toward scalable quantum information processing, especially for quantum communications and networking.

desk verdict A solid, honest Perspective whose roadmap value is real, but whose 'necessary' integration claim needs a quantitative systems budget before it carries weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17683 v1 pith:PJM47VV5 submitted 2024-12-23 quant-ph physics.optics

Karthik V. Myilswamy , Lucas M. Cohen , Suparna Seshadri , Hsuan-Hao Lu , Joseph M. Lukens This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords frequency-binencodingquantumfrequencyprocessorintegratedphotonicsmicroringresonatorsthin-filmlithiumniobatespectralpurityhyperentanglementnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Perspective argues that integrating frequency-bin quantum photonics onto chips is a necessary, though not sufficient, step toward scalable quantum information processing. Frequency-bin encoding stores quantum data in discrete optical frequencies, which naturally matches fiber-optic wavelength-division multiplexing, but tabletop demonstrations are limited by loss, size, and bandwidth. The paper surveys recent on-chip sources, pulse shapers, modulators, and hyperentangled states, and claims that the remaining bottleneck is material integration: the best microring pulse shapers are CMOS-compatible, while the best electro-optic modulators are made of thin-film lithium niobate, which is not. It envisions a future where on-chip frequency-bin circuits, particularly in quantum communications and networking, fulfill critical roles.

What carries the argument

The central object is the microring resonator, a compact waveguide loop that resonates at discrete frequencies and both generates frequency-bin-entangled photon pairs through spontaneous four-wave mixing (or second-order nonlinearity in lithium niobate) and filters or shapes individual bins. The operational framework is the quantum frequency processor (QFP), which alternates electro-optic phase modulators (mode mixers that scatter light into sidebands) with Fourier-transform pulse shapers (spectral phase masks), a combination theoretically capable of universal quantum processing. A third mechanism, the electro-optic photonic molecule, consists of two or more coupled microrings driven by fast RF modulation and performs frequency beamsplitting and shifting with high efficiency while suppressing unwanted sidebands.

What would settle it

A direct test is to build a fully integrated quantum frequency processor—on-chip pulse shapers plus electro-optic modulators acting on frequency-bin qudits—and compare its process fidelity with the tabletop three-element version; if the integrated chip cannot match that fidelity at comparable loss, the claim that integration is the critical scaling step loses force. A confirming observation would be a hybrid CMOS-TFLN device with simultaneously low insertion loss and more than 30 GHz modulation bandwidth, which would remove the stated impediment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that photonic integration is the pivotal step that will carry frequency-bin quantum information processing from proof-of-principle tabletop experiments to scalable systems. The authors argue this by assembling evidence that every necessary ingredient now exists on chip: microring resonators generate frequency-bin-entangled photon pairs directly; microring-based and arrayed-waveguide-grating pulse shapers provide spectral phase control; thin-film lithium niobate modulators and electro-optic photonic molecules provide fast frequency mixing; and integrated sources can be hyperentangled across time, path, and polarization. They further claim that the microring resonator is the natural unifying device, since it sources, filters, and shapes frequency bins in almost any platform. The paper does not claim integration is sufficient; it identifies the unresolved material mismatch between CMOS-compatible shapers and high-performance electro-optic modulators as the most challenging impediment, with no obvious winning integration strategy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the mismatch between CMOS-compatible microring pulse shapers and high-performance thin-film lithium niobate modulators can be overcome through one of the three integration strategies the paper sketches; the authors themselves say no obvious winner exists among them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A fully integrated QFP would lift the current three-element ceiling of tabletop demonstrations, allowing larger unitary circuits in a single device.
  • Frequency-bin sources with free spectral ranges of 20–50 GHz are now compatible with electro-optic manipulation, and two-qudit Hilbert spaces up to 8×8 have been fully characterized.
  • Spectral purity beyond the 93% single-ring bound is achievable through coupling engineering or pump-pulse shaping, with estimated purities as high as 99.7%.
  • Integrated microring sources have demonstrated time-, path-, and polarization-frequency hyperentanglement, positioning frequency bins to support qubits encoded in other degrees of freedom.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the material-mismatch bottleneck is solved, a chip could host many modulator-and-shaper stages rather than the three elements of today's tabletop QFPs, and the natural next milestone would be a multi-qudit gate on a single chip.
  • Because the same microring hardware that sources entangled pairs can also act as a spectral filter, the incremental cost of multipartite frequency-bin states such as GHZ and W states on chip may be lower than in path encoding, where fusion requires separate beamsplitter networks.
  • A testable extension would be to operate a chip-scale frequency-bin Bell-state source inside a live dense-WDM fiber link: success would show frequency-bin processing can coexist with classical traffic, settling part of the paper's multiplexing-versus-encoding question empirically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Perspective reviews recent work on frequency-bin quantum photonics in integrated platforms, organizing the field into state generation (single and multiple microring sources, multiphoton states, spectral purity), state manipulation (quantum frequency processors, pulse shapers, electro-optic modulators, non-QFP approaches including photonic molecules and nonlinear optics), and hyperentanglement (time-frequency, path-frequency, and polarization-frequency). The authors argue that photonic integration is a necessary, though not sufficient, step toward realizing the full potential of frequency-bin quantum information processing, and they highlight the microring resonator as the natural building block for this platform. The paper is explicitly forward-looking: it surveys demonstrated components, identifies open challenges such as the mismatch between CMOS-compatible pulse shapers and high-performance TFLN modulators, and offers an opinion on the most promising integration paths.

Significance. If the outlook presented here is correct, the paper provides a valuable and timely synthesis of a rapidly maturing subfield. Its central contribution is agenda-setting: it makes a credible, evidence-grounded case that frequency-bin encoding, which already benefits from natural compatibility with fiber and WDM infrastructure, can become a practical on-chip technology through the component advances catalogued in the paper. The survey is careful in its attribution of numbers to cited works (e.g., 99.7% purity from a 24-ring cascade, 641 GHz frequency shift, six-channel 3 GHz pulse shaper), and the authors explicitly flag limitations such as fabrication sensitivity and the unresolved TFLN/CMOS material mismatch. This transparency is a strength, and the paper should be judged as a perspective rather than as an original research claim.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V] The paper candidly concedes that the mismatch between CMOS-compatible pulse shapers and high-performance TFLN modulators is 'the most challenging impediment to a fully on-chip QFP' and that 'no obvious winner' exists among CMOS, monolithic TFLN, and hybrid integration. This is an honest limitation, but the abstract's phrase that integration is 'necessary' is stronger than the evidence presented. The force of the argument would be improved by either tempering this to 'likely necessary' or by adding a sentence listing the quantitative benchmarks (insertion loss, Vπ, bandwidth, crosstalk) that would validate a particular integration path.
  2. [Sec. III.A.2] 'galium arsenide' should read 'gallium arsenide'.
  3. [Sec. IV.C] The integrated polarization-frequency source of Ref. [167] has not yet explicitly verified hyperentanglement; the text says that hyperentanglement is 'expected to coexist' and shows a density matrix 'similar to what we would expect.' This hedging is appropriate, but one sentence explicitly stating that full hyperentanglement verification remains open would clarify the status for readers.
  4. [Sec. II.D] The definition of spectral purity is typeset in a way that reads as 'P = 1 /K = P n λ2 n' in the text; please use a clear equation environment, e.g., P = 1/K = Σ_n λ_n², to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a Perspective that synthesizes independent experimental and theoretical results, and its self-citations serve as literature pointers rather than as derivation inputs.

full rationale

This is a Perspective, not a derivation. It surveys integrated frequency-bin sources, manipulation platforms, and hyperentanglement, and its central claim that photonic integration is a necessary (though not sufficient) step is an argumentative synthesis rather than a result forced by equations. The QFP universality statement in Sec. I cites Ref. [17] by one of the authors, but that citation points to a peer-reviewed theoretical result used as background framing; no prediction in the paper reduces to it. The numerous self-citations in Secs. II–IV report specific experimental demonstrations (e.g., Refs. [29,31,32,59,67]), and the paper neither fits parameters to data nor claims to predict a quantity defined by those demonstrations. The Conclusion candidly concedes that the CMOS/TFLN materials mismatch is “the most challenging impediment to a fully on-chip QFP” and that there is “no obvious winner in our view.” That is a stated limitation of the practical forecast and a legitimate correctness risk for the “necessary” claim, but it is not circularity: it does not transform the paper's inputs into its outputs by construction. No step satisfies the definition of a circular reduction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a Perspective, the paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. Its outlook depends on several domain assumptions inherited from prior literature, especially that microring SFWM produces frequency-bin entanglement, that the QFP architecture is universal for frequency-bin computation, and that the TFLN/CMOS material tradeoff is the key integration challenge. These are accepted results or open questions from the cited literature, not new postulates.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Microring resonators automatically produce frequency-bin-entangled photons via spontaneous four-wave mixing, making them the defining integrated biphoton frequency comb source.
    Introduced in Sec. I and detailed in Sec. II A; this is a well-established result from prior literature (e.g., Refs. [60,61,62]) and is the basis for the source section.
  • domain assumption The QFP architecture (electro-optic modulators alternating with Fourier-transform pulse shapers) is theoretically capable of scalable universal quantum information processing.
    Cited from Ref. [17] in Sec. I and Sec. III A; the paper's roadmap for on-chip manipulation depends on this theoretical framework, which originates from one of the authors.
  • domain assumption Efficient electro-optic phase modulation with low optical loss is achievable in TFLN, which is not CMOS-compatible.
    Discussed in Sec. III A and the conclusion; this material compatibility tension is the central technical obstacle the paper identifies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On-chip frequency-bin quantum photonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PJM47VV5

@misc{pith2026241217683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On-chip frequency-bin quantum photonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PJM47VV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17683}
}
read the original abstract

Frequency-bin encoding furnishes a compelling pathway for quantum information processing systems compatible with established lightwave infrastructures based on fiber-optic transmission and wavelength-division multiplexing. Yet although significant progress has been realized in proof-of-principle tabletop demonstrations, ranging from arbitrary single-qubit gates to controllable multiphoton interference, challenges in scaling frequency-bin processors to larger systems remain. In this Perspective, we highlight recent advances at the intersection of frequency-bin encoding and integrated photonics that are fundamentally transforming the outlook for scalable frequency-based quantum information. Focusing specifically on results on sources, state manipulation, and hyperentanglement, we envision a possible future in which on-chip frequency-bin circuits fulfill critical roles in quantum information processing, particularly in communications and networking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17683 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Integrated sources of frequency-bin-entangled qudits. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Integrated demonstrations of spectrally pure pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Integrated approaches for frequency-bin ma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Examples of hyperentanglement involving frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pulse shapers Fourier-transform pulse shapers allow for controllable amplitude and phase modulation of the frequency com- ponents of an optical signal, typically achieved by spec- trally dispersing the signal’s spectrum, routing spectral regions to unique amplitude and phase modulators, and then recombining them into a single spatial mode. In the bulk, sp...

  2. [2]

    Electro-optic modulators Single-tone optical phase modulation scatters the car- rier light into sidebands at harmonics of the modulation frequency, as described by the Jacobi–Anger expansion. Characteristics of an ideal EOM are low insertion loss, low chirp, large electro-optic bandwidth, a compact foot- print, and a low half-wave voltage Vπ—the voltage r...

  3. [3]

    Photonic molecule Coupled resonant cavities enable coherent, dynamic control of the supported energy levels via fast phase mod- ulation within each cavity [134, 151, 152]. By precisely controlling the frequency and amplitude of the radio- frequency (RF) driving waveform, unitary frequency-bin transformations can be achieved, provided the photon lifetime i...

  4. [4]

    Originally es- tablished for quantum frequency conversion [155, 156], this approach enables shifting a photon’s frequency while preserving its quantum information

    Nonlinear optics Nonlinear frequency mixing is one of the earliest and most straightforward methods for manipulating the fre- quency components of single photons. Originally es- tablished for quantum frequency conversion [155, 156], this approach enables shifting a photon’s frequency while preserving its quantum information. When the infor- mation is dire...

  5. [5]

    Agrell, M

    E. Agrell, M. Karlsson, F. Poletti, S. Namiki, X. V. Chen, L. A. Rusch, B. Puttnam, P. Bayvel, L. Schmalen, Z. Tao, F. R. Kschischang, A. Alvarado, B. Mukherjee, R. Casellas, X. Zhou, D. van Veen, G. Mohs, E. Wong, A. Mecozzi, M.-S. Alouini, E. Diamanti, and M. Uysal, J. Opt. 26, 093001 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    International Telecommunications Union, Recommen- dation G.694.2 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    International Telecommunications Union, Recommen- dation G.694.1 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Gerstel, M

    O. Gerstel, M. Jinno, A. Lord, and S. B. Yoo, IEEE Commun. Mag. 50, S12 (2012)

    2012

Show all 192 references
  1. [9]

    Jinno, J

    M. Jinno, J. Light. Technol. 35, 1116 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Townsend, Electron

    P. Townsend, Electron. Lett. 33, 188 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    N. A. Peters, P. Toliver, T. E. Chapuran, R. J. Runser, S. R. McNown, C. G. Peterson, D. Rosenberg, N. Dall- mann, R. J. Hughes, K. P. McCabe, J. E. Nordholt, 11 and K. T. Tyagi, New J. Phys. 11, 045012 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    T. E. Chapuran, P. Toliver, N. A. Peters, J. Jackel, M. S. Goodman, R. J. Runser, S. R. McNown, N. Dallmann, R. J. Hughes, K. P. McCabe, J. E. Nordholt, C. G. Peterson, K. T. Tyagi, L. Mercer, and H. Dardy, New J. Phys. 11, 105001 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Eraerds, N

    P. Eraerds, N. Walenta, M. Legr´ e, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, New J. Phys. 12, 063027 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    K. A. Patel, J. F. Dynes, I. Choi, A. W. Sharpe, A. R. Dixon, Z. L. Yuan, R. V. Penty, and A. J. Shields, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041010 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    H. C. Lim, A. Yoshizawa, H. Tsuchida, and K. Kikuchi, Opt. Express 16, 16052 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Herbauts, B

    I. Herbauts, B. Blauensteiner, A. Poppe, T. Jennewein, and H. H¨ ubel, Opt. Express21, 29013 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Wengerowsky, S

    S. Wengerowsky, S. K. Joshi, F. Steinlechner, H. H¨ ubel, and R. Ursin, Nature 564, 225 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    N. B. Lingaraju, H.-H. Lu, S. Seshadri, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Optica 8, 329 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    D. L. Moehring, M. J. Madsen, K. C. Younge, J. R. N. Kohn, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, C. Monroe, and B. B. Blinov, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 300 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    S.-Y. Lan, S. D. Jenkins, T. Chaneli` ere, D. N. Matsuke- vich, C. J. Campbell, R. Zhao, T. A. B. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 123602 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    J. M. Lukens and P. Lougovski, Optica 4, 8 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, J. M. Lukens, W. J. Munro, A. M. Weiner, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Nat. Photon. 13, 170 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    H.-H. Lu, A. M. Weiner, P. Lougovski, and J. M. Lukens, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 31, 1858 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    H.-H. Lu, M. Liscidini, A. L. Gaeta, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Optica 10, 1655 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Ikuta, S. Yasui, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Nat. Photon. 10, 441 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Clemmen, A

    S. Clemmen, A. Farsi, S. Ramelow, and A. L. Gaeta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 223601 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Kobayashi, D

    T. Kobayashi, D. Yamazaki, K. Matsuki, R. Ikuta, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Opt. Express 25, 12052 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    H.-H. Lu, J. M. Lukens, N. A. Peters, O. D. Odele, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and P. Lougovski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030502 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Imany, O

    P. Imany, O. D. Odele, M. S. Alshaykh, H.-H. Lu, D. E. Leaird, and A. M. Weiner, Opt. Lett. 43, 2760 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    H.-H. Lu, J. M. Lukens, N. A. Peters, B. P. Williams, A. M. Weiner, and P. Lougovski, Optica 5, 1455 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Khodadad Kashi and M

    A. Khodadad Kashi and M. Kues, Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2000464 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    R. Xue, X. Liu, H. Li, L. You, Y. Huang, and W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 024045 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki, L. R. Cort´ es, S. Sciara, B. Wetzel, Y. Zhang, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, L. Caspani, J. Aza˜ na, and R. Morandotti, Nature 546, 622 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Imany, J

    P. Imany, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, O. D. Odele, K. Han, D. E. Leaird, J. M. Lukens, P. Lougovski, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Opt. Express 26, 1825 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    H.-H. Lu, K. V. Myilswamy, R. S. Bennink, S. Seshadri, M. S. Alshaykh, J. Liu, T. J. Kippenberg, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Nat. Commun. 13, 4338 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Clementi, F

    M. Clementi, F. A. Sabattoli, M. Borghi, L. Gianini, N. Tagliavacche, H. E. Dirani, L. Youssef, N. Bergam- asco, C. Petit-Etienne, E. Pargon, J. E. Sipe, M. Lisci- dini, C. Sciancalepore, M. Galli, and D. Bajoni, Nat. Commun. 14, 176 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Borghi, N

    M. Borghi, N. Tagliavacche, F. A. Sabattoli, H. E. Di- rani, L. Youssef, C. Petit-Etienne, E. Pargon, J. Sipe, M. Liscidini, C. Sciancalepore, M. Galli, and D. Bajoni, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064026 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    H.-H. Lu, J. M. Lukens, B. P. Williams, P. Imany, N. A. Peters, A. M. Weiner, and P. Lougovski, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 24 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    H.-H. Lu, E. M. Simmerman, P. Lougovski, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 120503 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    H.-H. Lu, N. B. Lingaraju, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Opt. Express 30, 10126 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    N. B. Lingaraju, H.-H. Lu, D. E. Leaird, S. Estrella, J. M. Lukens, and A. M. Weiner, Optica 9, 280 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    H.-H. Lu, N. A. Peters, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 29, 6300112 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Henry, D

    A. Henry, D. A. Fioretto, L. M. Procopio, S. Mon- fray, F. Boeuf, L. Vivien, E. Cassan, C. Alonzo-Ramos, K. Bencheikh, I. Zaquine, and N. Belabas, Adv. Pho- ton. 6, 036003 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Politi, M

    A. Politi, M. J. Cryan, J. G. Rarity, S. Yu, and J. L. O’brien, Science 320, 646 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, R. Augusiak, L. Manˇ cinska, D. Bacco, D. Bonneau, J. W. Silverstone, Q. Gong, A. Ac ´ ın, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. L. O’Brien, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Science 360, 285 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Nat. Photon. 14, 273 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walsmley, Optica 3, 1460 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Erhard, M

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Nature Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    G. B. Xavier and G. Lima, Commun. Phys. 3, 9 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    I. Nape, B. Sephton, P. Ornelas, C. Moodley, and A. Forbes, APL Photon. 8, 051101 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    X. Chen, Z. Fu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Adv. Photon. 3, 064002 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Moody, V

    G. Moody, V. J. Sorger, D. J. Blumenthal, P. W. Juodawlkis, W. Loh, C. Sorace-Agaskar, A. E. Jones, K. C. Balram, J. C. F. Matthews, A. Laing, M. Da- vanco, L. Chang, J. E. Bowers, N. Quack, C. Gal- land, I. Aharonovich, M. A. Wolff, C. Schuck, N. Sin- clair, M. Lonˇ car, T. K...

    2022

  46. [54]

    Labont´ e, O

    L. Labont´ e, O. Alibart, V. D’Auria, F. Doutre, 12 J. Etesse, G. Sauder, A. Martin, ´E. Picholle, and S. Tanzilli, PRX Quantum 5, 010101 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    T. Kaur, D. Peace, and J. Romero, arXiv:2409.03224 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bogaerts, P

    W. Bogaerts, P. De Heyn, T. Van Vaerenbergh, K. De Vos, S. Kumar Selvaraja, T. Claes, P. Dumon, P. Bienstman, D. Van Thourhout, and R. Baets, Laser Photon. Rev. 6, 47 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    M. S. Dahlem, C. W. Holzwarth, A. Khilo, F. X. K¨ artner, H. I. Smith, and E. P. Ippen, Opt. Express 19, 306 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    L. M. Cohen, S. Fatema, V. V. Wankhade, N. B. Lin- garaju, B. Zhang, D. Onural, M. Popovi´ c, and A. M. Weiner, J. Light. Technol. 42, 4503 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Agarwal, P

    A. Agarwal, P. Toliver, R. Menendez, S. Etemad, J. Jackel, J. Young, T. Banwell, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, Wei Chen, Wenlu Chen, J. Hryniewicz, F. John- son, D. Gill, O. King, R. Davidson, K. Donovan, and P. J. Delfyett, J. Light. Technol. 24, 77 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    M. H. Khan, H. Shen, Y. Xuan, L. Zhao, S. Xiao, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and M. Qi, Nat. Photon. 4, 117 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    J. Wang, H. Shen, L. Fan, R. Wu, B. Niu, L. T. Vargh- ese, Y. Xuan, D. E. Leaird, X. Wang, F. Gan, A. M. Weiner, and M. Qi, Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    B. E. Nussbaum, A. J. Pizzimenti, N. B. Lingaraju, H.- H. Lu, and J. M. Lukens, J. Light. Technol. 40, 7648 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    L. M. Cohen, K. Wu, K. V. Myilswamy, S. Fatema, N. B. Lingaraju, and A. M. Weiner, Nat. Commun. 15, 7878 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Clemmen, K

    S. Clemmen, K. P. Huy, W. Bogaerts, R. G. Baets, P. Emplit, and S. Massar, Opt. Express 17, 16558 (2009)

    2009

  57. [65]

    J. Chen, Z. H. Levine, J. Fan, and A. L. Migdall, Opt. Express 19, 1470 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Azzini, D

    S. Azzini, D. Grassani, M. J. Strain, M. Sorel, L. G. Helt, J. E. Sipe, M. Liscidini, M. Galli, and D. Bajoni, Opt. Express 20, 23100 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    C. L. Morrison, F. Graffitti, P. Barrow, A. Pickston, J. Ho, and A. Fedrizzi, APL Photon. 7, 066102 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Chiriano, J

    F. Chiriano, J. Ho, C. L. Morrison, J. W. Webb, A. Pick- ston, F. Graffitti, and A. Fedrizzi, Opt. Express 31, 35131 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Shukhin, I

    A. Shukhin, I. Hurvitz, S. Trajtenberg-Mills, A. Arie, and H. Eisenberg, Opt. Express 32, 10158 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    K. V. Myilswamy, J. A. Gaines, J. D. McKinney, J. M. Lukens, and A. M. Weiner, arXiv:2410.24188 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Seshadri, K

    S. Seshadri, K. V. Myilswamy, Z.-H. Ma, Y.-P. Huang, and A. M. Weiner, inCLEO: Fundamental Science (Op- tica Publishing Group, 2024) p. FTu4F.3

    2024

  64. [72]

    Banic, J

    M. Banic, J. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013505 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Engin, D

    E. Engin, D. Bonneau, C. M. Natarajan, A. S. Clark, M. G. Tanner, R. H. Hadfield, S. N. Dorenbos, V. Zwiller, K. Ohira, N. Suzuki, H. Yoshida, N. Iizuka, M. Ezaki, J. L. O’Brien, and M. G. Thompson, Opt. Express 21, 27826 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Savanier, R

    M. Savanier, R. Kumar, and S. Mookherjea, Opt. Ex- press 24, 3313 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    Alexander, A

    K. Alexander, A. Bahgat, A. Benyamini, D. Black, D. Bonneau, S. Burgos, B. Burridge, G. Campbell, G. Catalano, A. Ceballos, C.-M. Chang, C. Chung, F. Danesh, T. Dauer, M. Davis, E. Dudley, P. Er-Xuan, J. Fargas, A. Farsi, C. Fenrich, J. Frazer, M. Fukami, Y. Ganesan, G. Gibson...

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, P. Imany, O. D. Odele, D. E. Leaird, Z.-Y. Ou, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Optica 4, 655 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Imany, O

    P. Imany, O. D. Odele, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, D. E. Leaird, and A. M. Weiner, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013813 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    Samara, A

    F. Samara, A. Martin, C. Autebert, M. Karpov, T. J. Kippenberg, H. Zbinden, and R. Thew, Opt. Express 27, 19309 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Joshi, A

    C. Joshi, A. Farsi, A. Dutt, B. Y. Kim, X. Ji, Y. Zhao, A. M. Bishop, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 143601 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    K. Wu, Q. Zhang, and A. W. Poon, Opt. Express 29, 24750 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Mahmudlu, R

    H. Mahmudlu, R. Johanning, A. van Rees, A. Kho- dadad Kashi, J. P. Epping, R. Haldar, K.-J. Boller, and M. Kues, Nat. Photon. 17, 518 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Chen, Y.-H

    R. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, J. Long, B. Shi, C. Shen, and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 083803 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Reimer, L

    C. Reimer, L. Caspani, M. Clerici, M. Ferrera, M. Kues, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, L. Razzari, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Opt. Express 22, 6535 (2014)

    2014

  76. [84]

    Roztocki, M

    P. Roztocki, M. Kues, C. Reimer, B. Wetzel, S. Sciara, Y. Zhang, A. Cino, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Opt. Express 25, 18940 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    Reimer, S

    C. Reimer, S. Sciara, P. Roztocki, M. Islam, L. R. Cort´ es, Y. Zhang, B. Fischer, S. Loranger, R. Kashyap, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, L. Caspani, W. J. Munro, J. Aza˜ na, M. Kues, and R. Morandotti, Nat. Phys. 15, 148 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Sugiura, Z

    K. Sugiura, Z. Yin, R. Okamoto, L. Zhang, L. Kang, J. Chen, P. Wu, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, and S. Takeuchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 224001 (2020)

    2020

  79. [87]

    T. J. Steiner, J. E. Castro, L. Chang, Q. Dang, W. Xie, J. Norman, J. E. Bowers, and G. Moody, PRX Quan- tum 2, 010337 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Y. K. Chembo, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033820 (2016)

    2016

  81. [89]

    A. E. Afifi, M. Hammood, N. A. Jaeger, S. Shekhar, L. Chrostowski, and J. F. Young, Opt. Express 29, 25173 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    Goswami and B

    A. Goswami and B. Krishna Das, Opt. Lett. 47, 1474 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Ma, J.-Y

    Z. Ma, J.-Y. Chen, Z. Li, C. Tang, Y. M. Sua, H. Fan, and Y.-P. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 263602 (2020). 13

    2020

  84. [92]

    U. A. Javid, R. Lopez-Rios, J. Ling, A. Graf, J. Staffa, and Q. Lin, Nat. Photon. 17, 883 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    Hwang, W

    H. Hwang, W. Noh, M. R. Nurrahman, G. Kim, K. Moon, J. J. Ju, H. Lee, and M.-K. Seo, Opt. Lett. 49, 5379 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Guo, C.-l

    X. Guo, C.-l. Zou, C. Schuck, H. Jung, R. Cheng, and H. X. Tang, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16249 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    Zhang, C

    L. Zhang, C. Cui, J. Yan, Y. Guo, J. Wang, and L. Fan, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 57 (2023)

    2023

  88. [96]

    Zatti, N

    L. Zatti, N. Bergamasco, E. Lomonte, F. Lenzini, W. Pernice, and M. Liscidini, Opt. Lett. 47, 1766 (2022)

    2022

  89. [97]

    Liscidini and J

    M. Liscidini and J. E. Sipe, Opt. Lett. 44, 2625 (2019)

    2019

  90. [98]

    F. A. Sabattoli, L. Gianini, A. Simbula, M. Clementi, A. Fincato, F. Boeuf, M. Liscidini, M. Galli, and D. Ba- joni, Opt. Lett. 47, 6201 (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    Seshadri, H.-H

    S. Seshadri, H.-H. Lu, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 230505 (2022)

    2022

  92. [100]

    J. I. Cirac, A. Ekert, S. F. Huelga, and C. Macchiavello, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4249 (1999)

    1999

  93. [101]

    S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 57, 822 (1998)

    1998

  94. [102]

    Hillery, V

    M. Hillery, V. Buˇ zek, and A. Berthiaume, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999)

    1999

  95. [103]

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990)

    1990

  96. [104]

    C.-Y. Lu, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020501 (2009)

    2009

  97. [105]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999)

    1999

  98. [106]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  99. [107]

    D¨ ur, G

    W. D¨ ur, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000)

    2000

  100. [108]

    Banic, J

    M. Banic, J. E. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, arXiv:2409.04250 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Meyer-Scott, C

    E. Meyer-Scott, C. Silberhorn, and A. Migdall, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 041101 (2020)

    2020

  102. [110]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Nat. Photon. 10, 631 (2016)

    2016

  103. [111]

    Takesue and K

    H. Takesue and K. Shimizu, Opt. Commun. 283, 276 (2010)

    2010

  104. [112]

    M. Pont, G. Corrielli, A. Fyrillas, I. Agresti, G. Car- vacho, N. Maring, P.-E. Emeriau, F. Ceccarelli, R. Al- biero, P. H. Dias Ferreira, N. Somaschi, J. Senellart, I. Sagnes, M. Morassi, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, P. Senellart, F. Scia- rrino, M. Liscidini, N. Belabas, and R. Osellame,...

    2024

  105. [113]

    Y. Liu, C. Wu, X. Gu, Y. Kong, X. Yu, R. Ge, X. Cai, X. Qiang, J. Wu, X. Yang, and P. Xu, Opt. Lett. 45, 73 (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    B. M. Burridge, I. I. Faruque, J. G. Rarity, and J. Bar- reto, Optica 10, 1471 (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    B. M. Burridge, I. I. Faruque, J. G. Rarity, and J. Bar- reto, Opt. Lett. 45, 4048 (2020)

    2020

  108. [116]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. We- infurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

    1997

  109. [117]

    J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998)

    1998

  110. [118]

    Merkouche, V

    S. Merkouche, V. Thiel, A. O. C. Davis, and B. J. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 063602 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    Zhong, Y

    H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, W. Li, L.-C. Peng, Z.-E. Su, Y. Hu, Y.-M. He, X. Ding, W. Zhang, H. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. You, X.-L. Wang, X. Jiang, L. Li, Y.-A. Chen, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250505 (2018)

    2018

  112. [120]

    Azuma, K

    K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, Nat. Commun. 6, 6787 (2015)

    2015

  113. [121]

    C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000)

    2000

  114. [122]

    W. P. Grice, A. B. U’Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063815 (2001)

    2001

  115. [123]

    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127903 (2004)

    2004

  116. [124]

    Vernon, M

    Z. Vernon, M. Menotti, C. C. Tison, J. A. Steidle, M. L. Fanto, P. M. Thomas, S. F. Preble, A. M. Smith, P. M. Alsing, M. Liscidini, and J. E. Sipe, Opt. Lett. 42, 3638 (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    Borghi, P

    M. Borghi, P. L. Pagano, M. Liscidini, D. Bajoni, and M. Galli, Opt. Lett. 49, 3966 (2024)

    2024

  118. [126]

    J. B. Christensen, J. G. Koefoed, K. Rottwitt, and C. J. McKinstrie, Opt. Lett. 43, 859 (2018)

    2018

  119. [127]

    I. I. Faruque, G. F. Sinclair, D. Bonneau, T. Ono, C. Sil- berhorn, M. G. Thompson, and J. G. Rarity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 054029 (2019)

    2019

  120. [128]

    Liscidini and J

    M. Liscidini and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 193602 (2013)

    2013

  121. [129]

    A. M. Weiner, Opt. Commun. 284, 3669 (2011)

    2011

  122. [130]

    M. K. Smit and C. Van Dam, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quan- tum Electron. 2, 236 (1996)

    1996

  123. [131]

    N. K. Fontaine, R. P. Scott, C. Yang, D. J. Geisler, J. P. Heritage, K. Okamoto, and S. J. B. Yoo, Opt. Lett. 33, 1714 (2008)

    2008

  124. [132]

    F. M. Soares, N. K. Fontaine, R. P. Scott, J. H. Baek, X. Zhou, T. Su, S. Cheung, Y. Wang, C. Junesand, S. Lourdudoss, K. Y. Liou, R. A. Hamm, W. Wang, B. Patel, L. A. Gruezke, W. T. Tsang, J. P. Heritage, and S. J. B. Yoo, IEEE Photon. J. 3, 975 (2011)

    2011

  125. [133]

    A. J. Metcalf, H.-J. Kim, D. E. Leaird, J. A. Jaramillo- Villegas, K. A. McKinzie, V. Lal, A. Hosseini, G. E. Hoefler, F. Kish, and A. M. Weiner, Opt. Express 24, 23925 (2016)

    2016

  126. [134]

    S. Feng, C. Qin, K. Shang, S. Pathak, W. Lai, B. Guan, M. Clements, T. Su, G. Liu, H. Lu, R. P. Scott, and S. J. B. Yoo, Opt. Express 25, 8872 (2017)

    2017

  127. [135]

    K. Wu, L. M. Cohen, K. V. Myilswamy, N. B. Lin- garaju, H.-H. Lu, J. M. Lukens, and A. M. Weiner, arXiv:2409.13638 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Kieninger, Y

    C. Kieninger, Y. Kutuvantavida, D. L. Elder, S. Wolf, H. Zwickel, M. Blaicher, J. N. Kemal, M. Lauermann, S. Randel, W. Freude, L. R. Dalton, and C. Koos, Optica 5, 739 (2018)

    2018

  129. [137]

    X. Wang, V. Mere, F. Valdez, and S. Mookherjea, Op- tica Quantum 1, 19 (2023)

    2023

  130. [138]

    Y. Hu, M. Yu, D. Zhu, N. Sinclair, A. Shams-Ansari, L. Shao, J. Holzgrafe, E. Puma, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, Nature599, 587 (2021)

    2021

  131. [139]

    G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thomson, Nat. Photon. 4, 518 (2010)

    2010

  132. [140]

    Rahim, A

    A. Rahim, A. Hermgans, B. Wohlfeil, D. Petousi, B. Kuyken, D. V. Thourhout, and R. G. Baets, Adv. Photon. 3, 024003 (2021)

    2021

  133. [141]

    Sinatkas, T

    G. Sinatkas, T. Christopoulos, O. Tsilipakos, and E. E. Kriezis, J. Appl. Phys. 130, 010901 (2021)

    2021

  134. [142]

    A. Boes, L. Chang, C. Langrock, M. Yu, M. Zhang, Q. Lin, M. Lonˇ car, M. Fejer, J. Bowers, and A. Mitchell, Science 379, eabj4396 (2023). 14

    2023

  135. [143]

    Karvounis, F

    A. Karvounis, F. Timpu, V. V. Vogler-Neuling, R. Savo, and R. Grange, Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 2001249 (2020)

    2020

  136. [144]

    Baboux, G

    F. Baboux, G. Moody, and S. Ducci, Optica 10, 917 (2023)

    2023

  137. [145]

    Wooten, K

    E. Wooten, K. Kissa, A. Yi-Yan, E. Murphy, D. Lafaw, P. Hallemeier, D. Maack, D. Attanasio, D. Fritz, G. McBrien, and D. Bossi, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quan- tum Electron. 6, 69 (2000)

    2000

  138. [146]

    D. Zhu, C. Chen, M. Yu, L. Shao, Y. Hu, C. J. Xin, M. Yeh, S. Ghosh, L. He, C. Reimer, N. Sinclair, F. N. C. Wong, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 327 (2022)

    2022

  139. [147]

    M. Lee, H. E. Katz, C. Erben, D. M. Gill, P. Gopalan, J. D. Heber, and D. J. McGee, Science 298, 1401 (2002)

    2002

  140. [148]

    Alloatti, R

    L. Alloatti, R. Palmer, S. Diebold, K. P. Pahl, B. Chen, R. Dinu, M. Fournier, J.-M. Fedeli, T. Zwick, W. Freude, C. Koos, and J. Leuthold, Light Sci. Appl. 3, e173 (2014)

    2014

  141. [149]

    Ummethala, J

    S. Ummethala, J. N. Kemal, A. S. Alam, M. Lauer- mann, A. Kuzmin, Y. Kutuvantavida, S. H. Nandam, L. Hahn, D. L. Elder, L. R. Dalton, T. Zwick, S. Ran- del, W. Freude, and C. Koos, Optica 8, 511 (2021)

    2021

  142. [150]

    Savage, Nat

    N. Savage, Nat. Photon. 4, 728 (2010)

    2010

  143. [151]

    L. Shao, N. Sinclair, J. Leatham, Y. Hu, M. Yu, T. Turpin, D. Crowe, and M. Lonˇ car, Opt. Express 28, 23728 (2020)

    2020

  144. [152]

    H. Zhao, B. Li, H. Li, and M. Li, Nat. Commun. 13, 5426 (2022)

    2022

  145. [153]

    Y. Zhou, F. Ruesink, M. Pavlovich, R. Behunin, H. Cheng, S. Gertler, A. L. Starbuck, A. J. Leenheer, A. T. Pomerene, D. C. Trotter, K. M. Musick, M. Gehl, A. Kodigala, M. Eichenfield, A. L. Lentine, N. Otter- strom, and P. Rakich, Nat. Commun. 15, 6796 (2024)

    2024

  146. [154]

    D. Fall, M. Duquennoy, M. Ouaftouh, N. Smagin, B. Pi- wakowski, and F. Jenot, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, EL108 (2017)

    2017

  147. [155]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, Y. Hu, A. Shams-Ansari, T. Ren, S. Fan, and M. Lonˇ car, Nat. Photon. 13, 36 (2019)

    2019

  148. [156]

    Buddhiraju, A

    S. Buddhiraju, A. Dutt, M. Minkov, I. A. D. Williamson, and S. Fan, Nat. Commun. 12, 2401 (2021)

    2021

  149. [157]

    Shams-Ansari, G

    A. Shams-Ansari, G. Huang, L. He, Z. Li, J. Holz- grafe, M. Jankowski, M. Churaev, P. Kharel, R. Cheng, D. Zhu, N. Sinclair, B. Desiatov, M. Zhang, T. J. Kippenberg, and M. Lonˇ car, APL Photon. 7, 081301 (2022)

    2022

  150. [158]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Shao, J. Yang, Z. Chen, K. Zhang, K.-M. Shum, D. Zhu, C. H. Chan, M. Lonˇ car, and C. Wang, Photon. Res. 10, 2380 (2022)

    2022

  151. [159]

    Kumar, Opt

    P. Kumar, Opt. Lett. 15, 1476 (1990)

    1990

  152. [160]

    Huang and P

    J. Huang and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2153 (1992)

    1992

  153. [161]

    Oliver, M

    R. Oliver, M. Blau, X. Ji, R. Guti´ errez-J´ auregui, A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, in Quantum 2.0 (Optica Publishing Group, 2023) p. QW4A.3

    2023

  154. [162]

    Serino, J

    L. Serino, J. Gil-Lopez, M. Stefszky, R. Ricken, C. Eigner, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, PRX Quan- tum 4, 020306 (2023)

    2023

  155. [163]

    Serino, C

    L. Serino, C. Eigner, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, arXiv:2410.03606 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  156. [164]

    X. Wang, X. Jiao, B. Wang, Y. Liu, X.-P. Xie, M.-Y. Zheng, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 38 (2023)

    2023

  157. [165]

    J.-Y. Chen, Z. Li, Z. Ma, C. Tang, H. Fan, Y. M. Sua, and Y.-P. Huang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064004 (2021)

    2021

  158. [166]

    Q. Li, M. Davan¸ co, and K. Srinivasan, Nat. Photon. 10, 406 (2016)

    2016

  159. [167]

    Singh, Q

    A. Singh, Q. Li, S. Liu, Y. Yu, X. Lu, C. Schneider, S. H¨ ofling, J. Lawall, V. Verma, R. Mirin, S. W. Nam, J. Liu, and K. Srinivasan, Optica 6, 563 (2019)

    2019

  160. [168]

    Simon and J.-W

    C. Simon and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 257901 (2002)

    2002

  161. [169]

    J. T. Barreiro, T.-C. Wei, and P. G. Kwiat, Nat. Phys. 4, 282 (2008)

    2008

  162. [170]

    T. M. Graham, H. J. Bernstein, T.-C. Wei, M. Junge, and P. G. Kwiat, Nat. Commun. 6, 7185 (2015)

    2015

  163. [171]

    Miloshevsky, L

    A. Miloshevsky, L. M. Cohen, K. V. Myilswamy, M. Al- showkan, S. Fatema, H.-H. Lu, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Optica Quantum 2, 254 (2024)

    2024

  164. [172]

    H.-H. Lu, M. Alshowkan, K. V. Myilswamy, A. M. Weiner, J. M. Lukens, and N. A. Peters, Opt. Lett. 48, 6031 (2023)

    2023

  165. [173]

    Imany, J

    P. Imany, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, M. S. Alshaykh, J. M. Lukens, O. D. Odele, A. J. Moore, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 59 (2019)

    2019

  166. [174]

    Reimer, M

    C. Reimer, M. Kues, L. Caspani, B. Wetzel, P. Roz- tocki, M. Clerici, Y. Jestin, M. Ferrera, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Nat. Commun. 6, 1 (2015)

    2015

  167. [175]

    R. T. Horn, P. Kolenderski, D. Kang, P. Abolghasem, C. Scarcella, A. D. Frera, A. Tosi, L. G. Helt, S. V. Zhukovsky, J. E. Sipe, G. Weihs, A. S. Helmy, and T. Jennewein, Sci. Rep. 3, 2314 (2013)

    2013

  168. [176]

    Kultavewuti, E

    P. Kultavewuti, E. Y. Zhu, X. Xing, L. Qian, V. Pusino, M. Sorel, and J. S. Aitchison, Sci. Rep. 7, 5785 (2017)

    2017

  169. [177]

    Matsuda, H

    N. Matsuda, H. Le Jeannic, H. Fukuda, T. Tsuchizawa, W. J. Munro, K. Shimizu, K. Yamada, Y. Tokura, and H. Takesue, Sci. Rep. 2, 817 (2012)

    2012

  170. [178]

    Olislager, J

    L. Olislager, J. Safioui, S. Clemmen, K. P. Huy, W. Bo- gaerts, R. Baets, P. Emplit, and S. Massar, Opt. Lett. 38, 1960 (2013)

    2013

  171. [179]

    J. Fan, M. D. Eisaman, and A. Migdall, Phys. Rev. A 76, 043836 (2007)

    2007

  172. [180]

    Vergyris, F

    P. Vergyris, F. Kaiser, E. Gouzien, G. Sauder, T. Lunghi, and S. Tanzilli, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 024007 (2017)

    2017

  173. [181]

    Alshowkan, J

    M. Alshowkan, J. M. Lukens, H.-H. Lu, B. T. Kirby, B. P. Williams, W. P. Grice, and N. A. Peters, Opt. Lett. 47, 6480 (2022)

    2022

  174. [182]

    J. Suo, S. Dong, W. Zhang, Y. Huang, and J. Peng, Opt. Express 23, 3985 (2015)

    2015

  175. [183]

    W. Wen, W. Yan, C. Lu, L. Lu, X. Wu, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 064032 (2023)

    2023

  176. [184]

    D. Dai, L. Liu, S. Gao, D.-X. Xu, and S. He, Laser Photon. Rev. 7, 303 (2013)

    2013

  177. [185]

    M. W. Pruessner, K. J. Walsh, N. F. Tyndall, N. M. Fahrenkopf, A. O. Antohe, and T. H. Stievater, Opt. Express 32, 16702 (2024)

    2024

  178. [186]

    Grassani, S

    D. Grassani, S. Azzini, M. Liscidini, M. Galli, M. J. Strain, M. Sorel, J. E. Sipe, and D. Bajoni, Optica 2, 88 (2015)

    2015

  179. [187]

    Ramelow, A

    S. Ramelow, A. Farsi, S. Clemmen, D. Orquiza, K. Luke, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, arXiv:1508.04358 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  180. [188]

    Reimer, M

    C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, B. Wetzel, F. Grazioso, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, T. Johnston, 15 Y. Bromberg, L. Caspani, D. J. Moss, and R. Moran- dotti, Science 351, 1176 (2016)

    2016

  181. [189]

    Z. Lu, J. Jhoja, J. Klein, X. Wang, A. Liu, J. Flueckiger, J. Pond, and L. Chrostowski, Opt. Express 25, 9712 (2017)

    2017

  182. [190]

    Bogaerts, Y

    W. Bogaerts, Y. Xing, and U. Khan, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 6100413 (2019)

    2019

  183. [191]

    A. W. Elshaari, W. Pernice, K. Srinivasan, O. Benson, and V. Zwiller, Nat. Photon. 14, 285 (2020)

    2020

  184. [192]

    Shekhar, W

    S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski, J. E. Bowers, M. Hochberg, R. Soref, and B. J. Shastri, Nat. Com- mun. 15, 751 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.