Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

The effect of outflow launching radial efficiency of accretion disk on the shape of emission-line profiles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Low-ionization line shapes trace cloud illumination more than the disk-outflow radial law.

desk verdict A modest but honest FRADO parameter study; the new flux-threshold result is real but hinges on a step-function cut that the paper itself admits is too simple. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18772 v1 pith:7DJX22NC submitted 2024-12-25 astro-ph.GA

Mohammad Hassan Naddaf This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords broadlineregionoutflowrateactivegalacticnucleiradiationpressureemissionprofilesFRADOmodeldustywindsphotonfluxthreshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the radial steepness of mass loss from an accretion disk controls the shapes of low-ionization broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei. Using the FRADO model, a failed radiatively accelerated dusty outflow that forms the broad line region (BLR), it compares two radial outflow laws, $\dot{M}_z(r)\propto r^{-0.5}$ and $\propto r^{-1.5}$, for a benchmark quasar. When every cloud contributes equally to the line, the two laws give different profiles: double-peaked for the shallower scaling and single-peaked for the steeper one. But when only clouds with a photon flux above about $10^{18}\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$ (the illumination needed to form H$\beta$/MgII) are allowed to emit, both scalings produce the same single-peaked profile. The paper concludes that the observed line shape depends more critically on the clouds' physical conditions and the adopted emissivity than on the radial behavior of the disk outflow, while still favoring the $r^{-3/2}$ scaling as the better match to the mean quasar.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is FRADO (Failed Radiatively Accelerated Dusty Outflow), a model upgraded to 2.5D in which dusty clumps are lifted from the surface of a Shakura-Sunyaev accretion disk by radiation pressure, lose their dust as they rise, and fall back ballistically; the model self-consistently outputs the BLR cloud distribution with no free launching parameters. The paper varies the radial outflow efficiency through the power-law index $s$ in $\dot M_z(r)\propto r^s$: $s=-0.5$ comes from an energy-wise approach with dust opacity scaling as $r^{-0.5}$, and $s=-1.5$ comes from single-scattering momentum balance. Emission-line profiles are then computed by Doppler-shifting cloud velocities at the mean viewing angle of $39^\circ$ under two emissivity assumptions: uniform emission from all clouds, or emission only from clouds meeting the photon-flux threshold $\log\phi\gtrsim17$-$18\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$. The threshold is the mechanism that makes the two outflow scalings converge, and it is what carries the argument that cloud conditions, not the outflow law, dominate the line shape.

What would settle it

Compute the profiles with a photoionization-based continuous emissivity, assigning each cloud a line emissivity that rises gradually with incident flux and depends on density, and compare the $s=-0.5$ and $s=-1.5$ cases; if the profiles diverge again, the paper's central claim fails. Observationally, a sample of quasars with independent kinematic measures of outflow steepness, such as blueshifted absorption features, that shows line profiles tracking outflow steepness would contradict the conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the radial power-law index of the disk mass-loss rate is a secondary factor in shaping low-ionization broad emission lines; the primary factor is how cloud emissivity is treated. In the 2.5D FRADO setup, the shallower scaling $s=-0.5$ spreads clouds over a wider, slower BLR and, under uniform emissivity, yields a double-peaked line, while $s=-1.5$ concentrates clouds near the black hole and yields a single-peaked line. Imposing the physically motivated photon-flux condition $\log\phi\gtrsim17$-$18\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$ for H$\beta$/MgII formation erases this distinction: only clouds launched from a narrow radial range near the black hole are bright enough to contribute, so both scalings give nearly identical single-peaked profiles. The paper therefore concludes that the shapes of low-ionization lines are dictated more by the illumination and dynamics of the inner clouds than by the specific radial form of the outflow, with the steeper $r^{-3/2}$ scaling still preferred for the mean quasar benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The key load-bearing premise is the step-function emissivity threshold: a cloud either contributes to the line once its photon flux exceeds about $10^{18}\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$ or not at all; if real emissivity varies smoothly with flux, or if the threshold sits at a different value, the radial outflow scaling would regain a visible role.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observed single-peaked low-ionization profiles cannot uniquely determine the radial outflow law, because the photon-flux threshold makes both $s=-0.5$ and $s=-1.5$ produce the same shape.
  • The steeper $r^{-3/2}$ scaling predicts a more compact, higher-velocity BLR, so BLR size and velocity dispersion measurements can still constrain the outflow efficiency even when profile shape cannot.
  • Across the transition to the dust-free inner region, the outflow launching efficiency should drop much more steeply, with power-law indices below $-2$ and down to roughly $-3.5$, concentrating high-ionization emission near the black hole.
  • For the mean SDSS quasar benchmark, the model yields broad lines with FWHM near 5000$-$6000 km/s and a slight blueshift, placing it in Population B2 (the moderate-accretion tile of the Eigenvector 1 classification) with negligible gravitational redshift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I read the flux-threshold result as implying that the observable low-ionization BLR is effectively a narrow, well-illuminated annulus; if true, reverberation-mapping size measurements trace the illumination-limited annulus rather than the full radial extent of the outflow.
  • A direct extension is to model H$\beta$ and MgII together: because the two lines form under different threshold fluxes, the profile difference between them should be a diagnostic of the radial outflow law.
  • The coincidence that $r^{-3/2}$ matches the Keplerian orbital-frequency scaling hints at a feedback loop in which returning failed-wind clouds disturb the disk surface and trigger new cloud launches; a hydrodynamical simulation of cloud re-impact could test whether such feedback self-regulates the outflow rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses the 2.5D FRADO model to compute BLR cloud distributions and Doppler-broadened emission-line profiles for two radial scalings of the disk outflow rate, s = -0.5 and s = -1.5. With uniform emissivity the two scalings give different profiles (double-peaked for s = -0.5 versus single-peaked for s = -1.5); with a photon-flux threshold (log φ ≈ 17–18) the profiles become similar. The paper concludes that the emission-line shape depends more critically on cloud physical conditions and the adopted emissivity treatment than on the radial outflow scaling, while still tentatively favoring the steeper s = -1.5 scaling for the mean SDSS quasar benchmark.

Significance. If the central conclusion survives scrutiny, it is a useful caution against overinterpreting line-profile shape as a direct diagnostic of the radial mass-loss profile in the BLR, and it motivates a more detailed treatment of cloud emissivity. The paper's strengths include a self-consistent calculation of the launching radii (no arbitrary inner/outer radius inputs), the use of an external photoionization constraint for the photon-flux threshold, and an explicit comparison of two outflow scalings. However, the quantitative support for the secondary preference for s = -1.5 is not yet established, and the central emissivity conclusion rests on a single binary threshold with no sensitivity analysis. The paper therefore presents a plausible and interesting exploratory result, but the evidence is currently provisional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (5)] The derivation in Eqs. (4)–(5) gives ˙M_z(r) ∝ r^{α-1}; with the quoted α ≈ -0.5, the predicted index is s = -1.5, not s = -0.5. The shallower case s = -0.5 is never derived from the stated optically thin or dust-opacity scalings (Eqs. 2, 3, and 5). Since the paper presents both s values as physically motivated outflow scenarios, the s = -0.5 branch needs either an explicit derivation or a clear label as an exploratory ad hoc case; otherwise the comparison in Figures 1, 2, and 4 is not between two model predictions.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 2; Section 5, Discussion] The preference for s = -1.5 is asserted from a visual comparison with the 'overall shape of the low-ionization broad emission profile' of the SDSS mean quasar, but the observed composite profile is not shown and no quantitative goodness-of-fit or profile metric is provided. The statement that s = -1.5 'better reproduces observed profiles' is therefore not supported by the evidence presented. An overlay with the Vanden Berk et al. composite, or a quantitative measure such as peak-to-wing ratio or FWHM comparison, is needed to justify this secondary claim.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4; Section 5, Discussion] The central conclusion that the emissivity treatment dominates over the outflow scaling rests on a binary photon-flux threshold: Section 4 quotes log φ ≳ 17–18 cm⁻² s⁻¹, but Figure 3 and Section 5 use φ ≳ 10^18 cm⁻² s⁻¹, so the exact threshold used in the profile calculation is not specified reproducibly. No sensitivity analysis is performed: varying the threshold within the stated range, smoothing the step function, or adopting a gradually rising emissivity could restore differences between the s = -0.5 and s = -1.5 profiles. Given that Section 5 itself concedes that 'a more sophisticated treatment of the cloud emissivity' is needed, the headline claim is currently provisional.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] Several grammatical issues should be corrected, e.g., 'how the mass ejection rate contribute' and 'Overally' in Section 2.
  2. [Section 3] 'Thompson scattering' should be 'Thomson scattering'.
  3. [Section 4] The model is referred to inconsistently as '2.5 FRADO' and '2.5D FRADO'; use the latter throughout.
  4. [References] Some reference entries contain malformed arXiv identifiers (e.g., 'arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0306389') and one reference (ref. 19) is cited only as an arXiv e-print without journal details; these should be cleaned up.
  5. [Front matter] The manuscript uses placeholder journal metadata ('Universe 2024, 1, 0' and a placeholder DOI); these need to be completed before formal submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the line-profile comparison is a forward model against external SDSS and photoionization constraints, with no fitted parameter embedded in the prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward-modeling exercise: it takes the FRADO cloud distributions from prior work, computes Doppler-broadened line profiles under two radial outflow scalings and two emissivity treatments, and compares the results with the external SDSS mean quasar composite. The photon-flux threshold adopted in Section 4 is taken from an external photoionization study (Pandey et al. 2023, ref. [37]), not derived from or fitted to the target line profiles. The preference for s = -1.5 is a scenario comparison against an external benchmark, not a fitted-input prediction or a result forced by construction. Self-citations to the author's own FRADO papers supply the model, but the central claim - that the emissivity treatment strongly shapes the line profile - is demonstrated by varying the emissivity prescription while holding the model fixed; it does not reduce to those self-citations. The acknowledged limitations (e.g., the binary threshold and the need for detailed radiative transfer) are correctness risks, not circularity. No equation is used to predict a quantity that was already an input, and no fitted constant is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's results rest on the FRADO model developed in prior work by the same research group, on the standard Shakura-Sunyaev disk, on the single-scattering and energy-wise scaling arguments, and on the photon-flux threshold from external photoionization calculations. The two radial scaling indices are inputs chosen by hand; the paper provides no code, data, or grid parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Radial outflow power-law index s = -0.5 and -1.5
    Two scenarios are adopted by hand. The -1.5 value follows from the radiative-driving scalings in Section 3, while -0.5 is not derived from the stated assumptions and appears to be an ad hoc comparison case.
  • Photon-flux emissivity threshold log(phi) = ~17-18, used ~18 cm^-2 s^-1
    Hard cutoff for cloud contribution to H-beta and MgII lines, taken from [37] but applied as a binary step; not varied in this paper, yet load-bearing for the main conclusion.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard Shakura-Sunyaev thin disk flux F(r) = 3GM Mdot/(8 pi r^3)
    Invoked in Section 3 to derive radial outflow scaling; valid only for radiatively efficient thin disks at Eddington ratios roughly 0.01 to 1.
  • domain assumption Dusty clumps are optically thin and momentum transfer is single-scattering
    Used in Section 3 to derive dotM_z proportional to r^-1.5; ignores multiple scatterings.
  • domain assumption Dust opacity scales as r^alpha with alpha approximately -0.5
    Adopted in the optically thick energy-wise regime (Section 3, Eq. 5), citing refs [15, 33]; the specific alpha is not justified within this paper.
  • domain assumption Terminal outflow velocity equals the local escape velocity sqrt(GM/r)
    Assumed in Section 3, Eq. (1), following [32]; load-bearing for the derived scaling.
  • domain assumption Photon flux threshold log(phi) ~ 18 cm^-2 s^-1 for H-beta and MgII line formation
    Applied as a binary cut in Section 4, citing [37]; the step-function form and value are load-bearing for the central claim.
  • domain assumption 2.5D FRADO cloud distributions are physically correct
    The whole analysis rests on cloud positions and velocities from the author's model; no independent validation is provided in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The effect of outflow launching radial efficiency of accretion disk on the shape of emission-line profiles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7DJX22NC

@misc{pith2026241218772,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The effect of outflow launching radial efficiency of accretion disk on the shape of emission-line profiles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7DJX22NC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18772}
}
read the original abstract

This paper presents a preliminary investigation into the influence of radial behavior of disk outflow on the structure and dynamics of the broad line region (BLR) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs), with the emphasis on how the mass ejection rate contribute in shaping the broad emission line profiles. Specifically, we analyze how varying the radial efficiency of mass loss from accretion disks, driven by radiative dust-based mechanisms, contribute to the distribution of material in the BLR. By exploring different radial scenarios of disk mass loss behavior, we uncover connections between outflow radial efficiency and emission line profiles, particularly for lowly ionized lines. Our findings reveal that while the observed shape of broad emission lines is partially influenced by the radial behavior of the disk outflow, it ultimately depends more critically on the physical conditions of the clouds and the specific approach adopted to the emissivity for their contribution to the line formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18772 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Projected perspective of the spatial distribution of BLR clouds for the mean quasar model, based on the two adopted radial outflow rate functions. The left panel represents the shallower outflow scaling with s = −0.5, while the right panel illustrates the steeper scaling with s = −1.5. The horizontal and vertical axes denote the radial position and height of the clouds, expressed in units of the gravitational radius… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The emission line profiles for the model of mean quasar observed at the mean viewing angle of 39◦ for the two cases of radial functions of outflow rate. The left and right panels correspond to the cases with s = −0.5, and s = −1.5, respectively. The line flux is normalized to one and expressed in arbitrary units. We then introduce a physical condition which sets a threshold for clouds to contribute in the line shape… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of BLR clouds for the same model as in figure 1, though distinguished with the photon flux. Dusty and dustless clouds are shown in blue and red, respectively (if their photon flux ϕ >∼ 1018 cm−2 s −1 ); otherwise shown in cyan and magenta, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The emission line profiles for the same model as in figure 2; but with the new condition for emissivity of clouds based on the photon flux. 5. Discussion We considered two cases for the radial behavior of outflow from the disk, which contributes to the formation of the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift

    Schmidt, M. 3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift. Nature 1963, 197, 1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/1971040a0

    doi:10.1038/1971040a0 1963

  2. [2]

    Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars

    Antonucci, R. Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars. ARA&A 1993, 31, 473–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    arXiv 1993

  3. [3]

    Revisiting the Unified Model of Active Galactic Nuclei

    Netzer, H. Revisiting the Unified Model of Active Galactic Nuclei. ARA&A 2015, 53, 365–408, [1505.00811]. https://doi.org/10.1 146/annurev-astro-082214-122302

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Nuclear obscuration in active galactic nuclei

    Ramos Almeida, C.; Ricci, C. Nuclear obscuration in active galactic nuclei. Nature Astronomy 2017, 1, 679–689, [arXiv:astro- ph.GA/1709.00019]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    What broad emission lines tell us about how active galactic nuclei work

    Gaskell, C.M. What broad emission lines tell us about how active galactic nuclei work. NewAR 2009, 53, 140–148, [0908.0386]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2009.09.006

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    The environment of active galactic nuclei

    Collin-Souffrin, S.; Dyson, J.E.; McDowell, J.C.; Perry, J.J. The environment of active galactic nuclei. I - A two-component broad emission line model. MNRAS 1988, 232, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/232.3.539. Universe 2024, 1, 0 10 of 11

    doi:10.1093/mnras/232.3.539 1988

  7. [7]

    Accretion disk wind in the AGN broad-line region: Spectroscopically resolved line profile variations in Mrk110

    Kollatschny, W. Accretion disk wind in the AGN broad-line region: Spectroscopically resolved line profile variations in Mrk 110. A&A 2003, 407, 461–472, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0306389]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030928

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    The dust origin of the Broad Line Region and the model consequences for AGN unification scheme

    Czerny, B.; Modzelewska, J.; Petrogalli, F.; Pych, W.; Adhikari, T.P .;˙Zycki, P .T.; Hryniewicz, K.; Krupa, M.;´Swie¸ to ´ n, A.; Nikołajuk, M. The dust origin of the Broad Line Region and the model consequences for AGN unification scheme. Advances in Space Research 2015, 55, 1806–1815, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1409.7312]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.004

    arXiv 2015

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Photoionization Models of the Broad-line Region

    Leighly, K.M.; Casebeer, D. Photoionization Models of the Broad-line Region. In Proceedings of the The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei; Ho, L.C.; Wang, J.W., Eds., 2007, Vol. 373, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , p. 365, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph...

    2007 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Systematic effects in measurement of black hole masses by emission-line reverberation of active galactic nuclei: Eddington ratio and inclination

    Collin, S.; Kawaguchi, T.; Peterson, B.M.; Vestergaard, M. Systematic effects in measurement of black hole masses by emission-line reverberation of active galactic nuclei: Eddington ratio and inclination. A&A 2006, 456, 75–90, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0603460]. https://doi.org...

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale

    Gravity Collaboration.; Sturm, E.; Dexter, J.; Pfuhl, O.; Stock, M.R.; Davies, R.I.; Lutz, D.; Clénet, Y.; Eckart, A.; Eisenhauer, F.; et al. Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale. Nature 2018, 563, 657–660, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/181...

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dust in the Polar Region as a Major Contributor to the Infrared Emission of Active Galactic Nuclei

    Hönig, S.F.; Kishimoto, M.; Tristram, K.R.W.; Prieto, M.A.; Gandhi, P .; Asmus, D.; Antonucci, R.; Burtscher, L.; Duschl, W.J.; Weigelt, G. Dust in the Polar Region as a Major Contributor to the Infrared Emission of Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 2013, 771, 87, [arXiv:astro-ph.CO...

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Doughnut

    Elitzur, M.; Shlosman, I. The AGN-obscuring Torus: The End of the “Doughnut” Paradigm? ApJL 2006, 648, L101–L104, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0605686]. https://doi.org/10.1086/508158

    2006 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Proga, D.; Stone, J.M.; Kallman, T.R. Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 2000, 543, 686–696, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0005315]. https://doi.org/10.1086/317154

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    The Picture of BLR in 2.5D FRADO: Dynamics and Geometry

    Naddaf, M.H.; Czerny, B.; Szczerba, R. The Picture of BLR in 2.5D FRADO: Dynamics and Geometry. ApJ 2021, 920, 30, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2102.00336]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac139d

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dust in the Narrow-Line Region of Active Galactic Nuclei

    Netzer, H.; Laor, A. Dust in the Narrow-Line Region of Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJL 1993, 404, L51. https://doi.org/10.1086/18 6741

    1993 doi

  9. [17]

    Broad Emission Line Regions in Active Galactic Nuclei: The Link with the Accretion Power

    Nicastro, F. Broad Emission Line Regions in Active Galactic Nuclei: The Link with the Accretion Power. ApJL 2000, 530, L65–L68, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9912524]. https://doi.org/10.1086/312491

    2000 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The origin of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei

    Czerny, B.; Hryniewicz, K. The origin of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei. A&A 2011, 525, L8, [arXiv:astro- ph.CO/1010.6201]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016025

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Radiation pressure on dust explains the Low Ionized Broad Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Naddaf, M.H.; Czerny, B. Radiation pressure on dust explains the Low Ionized Broad Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei. arXiv e-prints 2021, p. arXiv:2111.14963, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2111.14963]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Accretion Disk Winds from Active Galactic Nuclei

    Murray, N.; Chiang, J.; Grossman, S.A.; Voit, G.M. Accretion Disk Winds from Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 1995, 451, 498. https://doi.org/10.1086/176238

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    A Test of the Formation Mechanism of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Czerny, B.; Du, P .; Wang, J.M.; Karas, V . A Test of the Formation Mechanism of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 2016, 832, 15, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1610.00420]. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/15

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Failed Radiatively Accelerated Dusty Outflow Model of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Czerny, B.; Li, Y.R.; Hryniewicz, K.; Panda, S.; Wildy, C.; Sniegowska, M.; Wang, J.M.; Sredzinska, J.; Karas, V . Failed Radiatively Accelerated Dusty Outflow Model of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Analytical Solution. ApJ 2017, 846, 154, [arXiv:astro-ph...

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Infrared Radiation from Dust in Seyfert Galaxies

    Rees, M.J.; Silk, J.I.; Werner, M.W.; Wickramasinghe, N.C. Infrared Radiation from Dust in Seyfert Galaxies. Nature 1969, 223, 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/223788a0

    1969 doi

  16. [24]

    Broad-line Balmer decrements in blue active galactic nuclei

    Dong, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Yuan, W.; Zhou, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, K. Broad-line Balmer decrements in blue active galactic nuclei. MNRAS 2008, 383, 581–592, [arXiv:astro-ph/0710.1458]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    BLR size in Realistic FRADO Model

    Naddaf, M.H.; Czerny, B.; Szczerba, R. BLR size in Realistic FRADO Model. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 2020, 7, 15, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1912.00278]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.00015

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Black holes in binary systems

    Shakura, N.I.; Sunyaev, R.A. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. A&A 1973, 500, 33–51

    1973

  19. [27]

    The Wind Dynamics of Super-Eddington Sources in FRADO.Dynamics 2022, 2, 295–305, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2209.09304]

    Naddaf, M.H.; Czerny, B.; Zajaˇ cek, M. The Wind Dynamics of Super-Eddington Sources in FRADO.Dynamics 2022, 2, 295–305, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2209.09304]. https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics2030015

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Active Galactic Nuclei Disk Winds, Absorption Lines, and Warm Absorbers

    Murray, N.; Chiang, J. Active Galactic Nuclei Disk Winds, Absorption Lines, and Warm Absorbers. ApJL 1995, 454, L105. https://doi.org/10.1086/309775

    1995 doi

  21. [29]

    Radiation-driven winds in Of stars

    Castor, J.I.; Abbott, D.C.; Klein, R.I. Radiation-driven winds in Of stars. ApJ 1975, 195, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1086/153315

    1975 doi

  22. [30]

    Predictions of the effect of clumping on the wind properties of O-type stars

    Muijres, L.E.; de Koter, A.; Vink, J.S.; Krtiˇ cka, J.; Kubát, J.; Langer, N. Predictions of the effect of clumping on the wind properties of O-type stars. A&A 2011, 526, A32. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014290

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    The Role of Radiative Acceleration in Outflows from Broad Absorption Line QSOs

    Arav, N.; Li, Z.Y. The Role of Radiative Acceleration in Outflows from Broad Absorption Line QSOs. I. Comparison with O Star Winds. ApJ 1994, 427, 700. https://doi.org/10.1086/174177

    1994 doi

  24. [32]

    Terminal Velocities and the Bistability of Stellar Winds

    Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.; Snow, T.P .; Lindholm, D.M. Terminal Velocities and the Bistability of Stellar Winds. ApJ 1995, 455, 269. https://doi.org/10.1086/176575

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    Rosseland and Planck mean opacities for protoplanetary discs

    Semenov, D.; Henning, T.; Helling, C.; Ilgner, M.; Sedlmayr, E. Rosseland and Planck mean opacities for protoplanetary discs. A&A 2003, 410, 611–621, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0308344]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20031279. Universe 2024, 1, 0 11 of 11

    2003 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Composite Quasar Spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.AJ 2001, 122, 549–564, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0105231]

    Vanden Berk, D.E.; Richards, G.T.; Bauer, A.; Strauss, M.A.; Schneider, D.P .; Heckman, T.M.; York, D.G.; Hall, P .B.; Fan, X.; Knapp, G.R.; et al. Composite Quasar Spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.AJ 2001, 122, 549–564, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0105231]. https://doi....

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7

    Shen, Y.; Richards, G.T.; Strauss, M.A.; Hall, P .B.; Schneider, D.P .; Snedden, S.; Bizyaev, D.; Brewington, H.; Malanushenko, V .; Malanushenko, E.; et al. A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7. ApJs 2011, 194, 45, [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/100...

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Misaligned Disks as Obscurers in Active Galaxies

    Lawrence, A.; Elvis, M. Misaligned Disks as Obscurers in Active Galaxies. ApJ 2010, 714, 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004 -637X/714/1/561

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    Broad-line region in active galactic nuclei: Dusty or dustless? A&A 2023, 680, A102, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2310.05089]

    Pandey, A.; Czerny, B.; Panda, S.; Prince, R.; Jaiswal, V .K.; Martinez-Aldama, M.L.; Zajaˇ cek, M.;´Sniegowska, M. Broad-line region in active galactic nuclei: Dusty or dustless? A&A 2023, 680, A102, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/2310.05089]. https://doi.org/10.1 051/0004-6361/202347819

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Proga, D.; Kallman, T.R. Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Effects of Disk Radiation. ApJ 2004, 616, 688–695, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0408293]. https://doi.org/10.1086/425117

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Reverberation Mapping of the Broad Line Region: Application to a Hydrodynamical Line-driven Disk Wind Solution

    Waters, T.; Kashi, A.; Proga, D.; Eracleous, M.; Barth, A.J.; Greene, J. Reverberation Mapping of the Broad Line Region: Application to a Hydrodynamical Line-driven Disk Wind Solution. ApJ 2016, 827, 53, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1601.05181]. https: //doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/53

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Average Quasar Spectra in the Context of Eigenvector 1

    Sulentic, J.W.; Marziani, P .; Zamanov, R.; Bachev, R.; Calvani, M.; Dultzin-Hacyan, D. Average Quasar Spectra in the Context of Eigenvector 1. ApJL 2002, 566, L71–L75, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0201362]. https://doi.org/10.1086/339594

    2002 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gravitational redshift of emission lines in the AGN spectra.Ap&SS 2015, 360, 7, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1602.03688]

    Bon, N.; Bon, E.; Marziani, P .; Jovanovi´ c, P . Gravitational redshift of emission lines in the AGN spectra.Ap&SS 2015, 360, 7, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1602.03688]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2555-5

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Internal Redshift Difference and Central Mass in QSOs

    Zheng, W.; Sulentic, J.W. Internal Redshift Difference and Central Mass in QSOs. ApJ 1990, 350, 512. https://doi.org/10.1086/16 8407

    1990 doi

  35. [43]

    Our Search for an H-R Diagram of Quasars

    Sulentic, J.W.; Zamfir, S.; Marziani, P .; Dultzin, D. Our Search for an H-R Diagram of Quasars. In Proceedings of the Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 2008, Vol. 32, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, pp. 51–58, [arX...

    2008 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    The shape of broad-line profiles in active galactic nuclei

    Kollatschny, W.; Zetzl, M. The shape of broad-line profiles in active galactic nuclei. A&A 2013, 549, A100, [arXiv:astro- ph.CO/1211.3065]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219411

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A disc wind model for blueshifts in quasar broad emission lines

    Matthews, J.H.; Strong-Wright, J.; Knigge, C.; Hewett, P .; Temple, M.J.; Long, K.S.; Rankine, A.L.; Stepney, M.; Banerji, M.; Richards, G.T. A disc wind model for blueshifts in quasar broad emission lines. MNRAS 2023, 526, 3967–3986, [arXiv:astro- ph.GA/2309.14434]. https://d...

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.