Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Oscillons in AdS space

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Oscillons in anti-de Sitter space are long-lived, and when the AdS radius is small, boundary-reflected radiation converts the decaying lump into a persistent oscillatory solution.

desk verdict A clean numerical study of oscillons in fixed AdS with a genuinely new recurrence observation, but the 'stable oscillatory solution' is a finite-time extrapolation that needs either softening or a convergence argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19468 v2 pith:LUVOQLJZ submitted 2024-12-27 hep-th hep-phnlin.PS

Takaaki Ishii , Takaki Matsumoto , Kanta Nakano , Ryosuke Suda , Kentaroh Yoshida This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-phnlin.PS
keywords oscillonsanti-deSitterspacescalarfieldtheoryrecurrenceasymmetricdouble-wellpotentialGaussianinitialdatashellenergyAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that the familiar oscillon—a localized, long-lived oscillating lump in a real scalar field—survives in a (3+1)-dimensional global anti-de Sitter spacetime, and that the AdS boundary changes its fate. Starting from the same Gaussian initial data used in Minkowski space, the authors find numerically that the lump oscillates for a long time, then decays; but because AdS acts as a reflecting box, the emitted radiation travels to the boundary and returns to the origin periodically, with round-trip time $\pi L$. When the AdS radius $L$ is small enough, the returning waves arrive before the oscillon can finish decaying, and the origin settles into a persistent oscillatory state—what the authors call a transition from a metastable oscillon to a stable oscillatory solution. The result matters because it shows recurrence in a non-integrable system and because long-lived localized states in AdS could be the gravitational side of long-lived fluctuations in a dual field theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the conformal compactification $r=L\tan\theta$, which maps the infinite AdS radius onto the finite interval $\theta\in[0,\pi/2)$, together with the rescaled time $\tau=t/L$. The boundary condition $\varphi(t,\theta=\pi/2)=0$ turns AdS into a reflecting box, and the natural clock of that box is the null round-trip time $\pi L$: radiation emitted toward the boundary returns to the origin after exactly this interval, matching the spacing of the small bumps and return peaks in the numerical data. The shell energy $E_s(t)$, defined by integrating the energy density out to a fixed shell radius, is the diagnostic that distinguishes the localized oscillon from outgoing radiation and shows that the returning signal is a wave packet rather than a moving lump. Finally, the Gaussian ansatz with a time-dependent amplitude $q(t)$ reduces the field equation to an effective nonlinear oscillator; demanding that its fluctuation squared-frequency become negative in some region gives the necessary bounds on the core size $R_0$ and on the AdS radius $L$ in Eqs. (C.14) and (C.17).

What would settle it

Repeat the $L=500$, $L=100$, and $L=50$ runs with a different treatment at the compactified edge—an absorbing layer, an outgoing boundary condition, or the power-law falloff appropriate for a massive scalar in AdS—and check whether sharp energy returns at intervals of $\pi L$ still appear and whether $L=50$ still oscillates without decay. If either phenomenon depends on the choice of boundary treatment, or if refining the spatial grid spacing near $\theta=\pi/2$ changes the height of the return peaks, the central claims fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central claim is that a real scalar field with the asymmetric double-well potential $V(\varphi)=\frac12\varphi^2-\frac{\alpha}{3}\varphi^3+\frac14\varphi^4$ in $d=3$ global AdS supports oscillons from Gaussian initial data, and that the AdS geometry controls their lifetime in a specific way. For a large radius ($L=500$), the solution follows the Minkowski pattern: a long oscillon regime, then an abrupt decay around $t\simeq 10000$, followed by recurrent returns of radiation every $500\pi$. As $L$ is reduced to $250$ and then $100$, the reflected waves return before the shell energy can drop to zero; at $L=50$, the oscillation at the origin is effectively stabilized, which the authors interpret as a transition from a metastable oscillon to a stable oscillatory solution. They also show that recurrence appears for non-oscillon Gaussian data, so the periodic reflection is a property of the AdS box rather than of the oscillon itself.

Load-bearing premise

All recurrence and stabilization results assume the AdS boundary acts as a perfect mirror, with the field set to zero at the compactified edge; if the correct boundary condition for a massive scalar instead lets radiation escape, or if the reflection is caused by the numerical grid at that edge, then the periodic returns and the stabilized oscillatory solution would not be genuine.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gaussian initial data of the Minkowski form produce long-lived oscillons in global AdS, so the oscillon does not depend on having a flat-space boundary at infinity.
  • In AdS, decay radiation returns to the origin every $\pi L$; the recurrence is observed for oscillon and non-oscillon Gaussian pulses alike, making it a geometric effect of the reflecting boundary.
  • When $L$ is comparable to the initial core size (roughly $L\sim 3R_0$), the reflected radiation interrupts the decay and the oscillon becomes a persistent oscillatory solution.
  • The Gaussian-ansatz stability analysis gives a necessary inequality: oscillons exist only above a minimal core size, and equivalently only above a minimal AdS radius, Eq. (C.17).
  • Long-lived oscillons in fixed AdS are a first step toward holographic applications, where such states would be dual to long-lived fluctuations in the boundary field theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the round-trip time $\pi L$ is fixed, the small-$L$ stabilization can be read as an externally forced oscillator driven periodically by reflected radiation; one testable extension is to scan $L$ continuously between $50$ and $100$ and look for resonance-like amplitude windows.
  • The numerics keep the AdS metric fixed; including gravitational backreaction may restore the known weakly turbulent instability of scalar fields in AdS, in which case the stable oscillatory state at $L=50$ could be a fixed-background artifact rather than a genuine nonlinear solution.
  • A clean way to isolate the box effect is to repeat the same Gaussian initial data in Poincaré AdS, where there is no reflecting boundary; recurrence and stabilization should disappear, confirming that they come from the global-AdS boundary rather than from curvature alone.
  • The Appendix C bound comes from a single-Gaussian ansatz; a two-mode or modulated-Gaussian ansatz could sharpen the predicted minimal AdS radius, giving an analytical cross-check independent of the numerics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a massive real scalar field with the asymmetric double-well potential (2.4) on a fixed (3+1)-dimensional global AdS background. Using Gaussian initial data (2.11) and a compactified radial coordinate (3.1), the authors numerically evolve the field and report three findings: long-lived oscillons for L=500; a recurrence phenomenon with period pi L after the oscillon decays, attributed to wave reflection in AdS; and an L-dependent behavior in which smaller L (L=250, 100, 50) prevents complete decay, culminating in what the abstract calls a transition from a metastable oscillon to a stable oscillatory solution. Appendix C derives a necessary bound on the core size R0 and, equivalently, on the AdS radius L. The paper also discusses potential AdS/CFT applications of these states.

Significance. If the stabilization claim were rigorously established, it would be a genuinely new result: a mechanism by which boundary reflection converts a metastable oscillon into a time-periodic solution in AdS. The recurrence phenomenon is clearly demonstrated and is consistent with the box-like nature of global AdS, though it is not by itself evidence of integrability. The analytic bound in Appendix C is a useful generalization of the Minkowski bound [3] and correctly reduces to it as L tends to infinity. The paper also reports energy conservation to 1e-4 and identifies an oscillon in a weakly coupled parameter regime (Appendix B). However, the central new claim (the transition to a stable oscillatory solution) rests on a single finite-time run without convergence or stability analysis, so the current significance is conditional on additional evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.4 and Abstract] The claim that a transition from a metastable oscillon to a stable oscillatory solution occurs for L=50 is not supported by the evidence. The only supporting data are finite-time runs in Fig. 10 (t <= 8000) and the shell-energy behavior; no infinite-time, Floquet, or attractor argument is given. The body text itself says 'effectively stabilized' and 'a kind of transition' (Section 3.4), while the abstract and conclusion state 'stable oscillatory solution.' This is a load-bearing upgrade. The authors should either soften the claim to a long-lived metastable state on accessible timescales or provide additional diagnostics, such as decay-rate extraction, variation of L around 50, longer runs, or different initial amplitudes.
  2. [Section 3.2] The numerical evidence lacks a convergence study. The paper reports a single set of grid parameters (dtheta=1.0e-4, dt=3.0e-7) and global energy conservation to 1e-4, but does not show that the observed recurrence period and especially the stabilization at L=50 are independent of resolution or of the boundary treatment at theta=pi/2. Because the recurrence and stabilization interpretations rely on wave reflection, a test with different outer-boundary implementations, such as a buffer or absorption zone or a slightly shifted boundary, is needed to rule out numerical reflection artifacts.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4] The statement that 'L=50 satisfies the bound but is close to Lmin' (with Lmin=3.73) is misleading, since L=50 is more than an order of magnitude above Lmin and the bound in Eq. (C.14) is only a necessary condition; it does not predict the stabilization transition.
  2. [Section 3.3] The recurrence is described as 'surprising' and 'integrable-ish' (Section 3.3, last paragraph), but in a reflecting box a non-integrable system can exhibit wave-reflection recurrences with period pi L; this language overstates the significance of the observation.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract repeats 'In particular' in the third and fourth sentences; consider rephrasing for clarity.
  4. [Figure 5] The caption of Figure 5 says 'The oscillon behavior around the decay time' but does not state that the plot is a density plot of phi(t,r) in the (theta, t) plane; please make the plotted quantity explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the numerical results are self-contained observations, and the derived bound reduces only to the known Minkowski limit, not to the target claims.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—oscillon longevity, recurrence with period πL, and the L-dependent transition toward an effectively stabilized oscillation—are obtained by direct numerical evolution of Eq. (3.2) from the explicit initial conditions (2.8)–(2.11). The Gaussian initial shape is an input, but the reported phenomena (long lifetime, radiation return, stabilization for small L) are observed outputs of the dynamics rather than restatements of that input. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed as a prediction. The recurrence period is independently fixed by the AdS travel time πL and is checked against the numerical periodicity, not imposed. The core-size bound in Appendix C is an explicit effective-Lagrangian calculation following [3], and the paper verifies that its L→∞ limit reproduces the Minkowski result; it is used only as a necessary condition to choose parameters, not as a derivation of longevity. The self-citations ([15], [18]) appear only in speculative future-application passages and are not load-bearing for the central numerical results. The paper even explicitly states in Sec. 3.3 that the fundamental mechanism for the recurrence is not yet understood, which further confirms that no derivation is being presented that could reduce to its own assumptions. The abstract's wording 'stable oscillatory solution' is stronger than the body's 'effectively stabilized,' and the finite-time evidence without a convergence study is a legitimate correctness concern, but that is an evidentiary weakness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are numerical, and the free parameters listed above are the hand-chosen simulation inputs. No new physical entities are introduced. The variational bound relies on the Gaussian ansatz, which is listed as a domain assumption.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha (dimensionless cubic coupling) = 2.3
    Chosen by hand following the Minkowski oscillon study [3]; all main figures use alpha = 2.3, and Appendix B uses alpha0 = 0.7.
  • R0 (initial Gaussian core size) = 3.8 (main), 2.4 (non-oscillon)
    Chosen by hand in Eq. (2.11); the core-size bound in Appendix C depends on R0, and the non-oscillon example uses R0 = 2.4.
  • L (dimensionless AdS radius) = 500, 250, 100, 50
    Scanned to demonstrate L-dependence; the transition to a stable oscillatory solution is observed at L = 50, and L = 500 is the main large-box case.
  • Initial amplitude A = 1 (main text), 4.0 (Appendix B)
    The Gaussian profile in Eq. (2.11) has unit amplitude in the main text; amplitude is a free choice and affects oscillon formation.
  • Rs (shell radius) = 15
    Used to define the shell energy Es in Eq. (2.12); changing Rs would change quantitative lifetime estimates, though the qualitative behavior likely remains.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scalar field propagates on a fixed, non-dynamical AdS background with no gravitational backreaction.
    The action (2.2) uses the fixed metric (2.1); no Einstein equations are solved, so the AdS shape is assumed rigid. This enters all simulations and the AdS/CFT discussion.
  • domain assumption The field vanishes at spatial infinity, phi(t, r=infinity) = 0 (Eq. 2.10), making the spacetime behave like a reflecting box.
    This boundary condition is imposed numerically after compactification in Section 3.1; recurrence and stabilization are consequences of this condition.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian profile e^{-r^2/R0^2} is a sufficient initial condition to produce oscillons, following the Minkowski case [3].
    Used in Eq. (2.11) and in the variational bound of Appendix C; no proof is given that other profiles behave the same.
  • domain assumption The variational Gaussian ansatz phi(t,r) = q(t) e^{-r^2/R0^2} approximates the oscillon shape for the bound derivation.
    Appendix C's necessary condition comes from this ansatz; it is not derived from the full PDE, so the bound is a variational estimate rather than a rigorous existence condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Oscillons in AdS space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LUVOQLJZ

@misc{pith2026241219468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Oscillons in AdS space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LUVOQLJZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19468}
}
read the original abstract

We study oscillons in a real scalar field theory in a (3+1)-dimensional AdS space with global coordinates. The initial configuration is given by a Gaussian shape with an appropriate core size as in Minkowski spacetime. The solution exhibits a long lifetime. In particular, since the AdS space can be seen as a box, the recurrence phenomenon can be observed under suitable conditions. In particular, as the AdS radius decreases, one can see a transition from a metastable oscillon to a stable oscillatory solution. Finally, we discuss some potential applications of the oscillon in the context of AdS/CFT duality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19468 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Now one can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) .       t   [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time evolution of the total and shell energies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) . As a possibility, one might think that a localized lump begins to move without decay and then is reflected to r = 0 . However, this can be excluded by seeing the green, red, pink and purple lines in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time evolution of energies in different integral regions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The oscillon behavior around the decay time. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) in the non-oscillon case.       t     [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time evolution of energies in the non-oscillon case. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) and the shell energy for L = 250 This tendency becomes even more pronounced when L = 100 as displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) and the shell energy for L = 100 In the case with L = 50 , the decay process itself is severely disrupted by the reflected waves as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) and the shell energy for L = 50 On the other hand, as derived in Appendix C, possible values of the AdS radius L are bounded from below. Hence, it is interesting to investigate the oscillon behavior around the bound. For the parameters d …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Oscillon with small α and λ . Time evolution of φ(t, r = 0) and the shell energy are displayed on the left and right sides, respectively. C A bound on the oscillon core size In the case of Minkowski spacetime, a possible bound for the size of the oscillon core has bee…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Resonances in Lifetimes of AdS Oscillon

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AdS oscillon lifetimes show resonance peaks both in initial core size and in spacetime curvature radius, with fitted logarithmic exponents and bifurcating peaks under reflected waves.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [3]

    Oscillons: Resonant co nfigurations during bubble collapse,

    E. J. Copeland, M. Gleiser and H. R. Muller, “Oscillons: Resonant co nfigurations during bubble collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995), 1920-1933 [arXiv:hep-ph/9503217 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1995

  2. [1]

    Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models f or elementary par- ticles,

    G. H. Derrick, “Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models f or elementary par- ticles,” J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964), 1252-1254

    work page 1964

  3. [2]

    Pseudostable bubbles,

    M. Gleiser, “Pseudostable bubbles,” Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994), 2978-2981 [arXiv:hep-ph/9308279 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    Analytical Characterization of Oscillon Ene rgy and Life- time,

    M. Gleiser and D. Sicilia, “Analytical Characterization of Oscillon Ene rgy and Life- time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), 011602 [arXiv:0804.0791 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    A General Theory of Oscillon Dynamics,

    M. Gleiser and D. Sicilia, “A General Theory of Oscillon Dynamics,” Phy s. Rev. D 80 (2009), 125037 [arXiv:0910.5922 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Oscillons in gapless theories,

    P. Dorey, T. Romanczukiewicz, Y. Shnir and A. Wereszczynski, “ Oscillons in gapless theories,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.8, 085017 [arXiv:2312.05308 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Positive energy in anti-de sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Positive energy in anti-de sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982), 197

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    On weakly turbulent instability of a nti-de Sitter space,

    P. Bizon and A. Rostworowski, “On weakly turbulent instability of a nti-de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011), 031102 [arXiv:1104.3702 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2011

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Time-Periodic Solutions in an E instein AdS Massless-Scalar-Field System,

    M. Maliborski and A. Rostworowski, “Time-Periodic Solutions in an E instein AdS Massless-Scalar-Field System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), 051102 [arXiv:1303.3186 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Geons and the instability of an ti-de Sitter spacetime,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, “Geons and the instability of an ti-de Sitter spacetime,” Surveys Diff. Geom. 20 (2015) no.1, 321-335 [arXiv:1408.5906 [gr-qc]]. 20

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Scalar field br eathers on anti-de Sitter background,

    G. Fodor, P. Forg´ acs and P. Grandcl´ ement, “Scalar field br eathers on anti-de Sitter background,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) no.6, 065027 [arXiv:1312.7562 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theo ries and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theo ries and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 231-252 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Green-Schwarz s tring in AdS 5× S5: Semi- classical partition function,

    N. Drukker, D. J. Gross and A. A. Tseytlin, “Green-Schwarz s tring in AdS 5× S5: Semi- classical partition function,” JHEP 04 (2000), 021 [arXiv:hep-th/0001204 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Non-relativistic superstrin gs: A New soluble sector of AdS 5× S5,

    J. Gomis, J. Gomis and K. Kamimura, “Non-relativistic superstrin gs: A New soluble sector of AdS 5× S5,” JHEP 12 (2005), 024 [arXiv:hep-th/0507036 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Non-relativistic string and D-br anes on AdS 5× S5 from semiclassical approximation,

    M. Sakaguchi and K. Yoshida, “Non-relativistic string and D-br anes on AdS 5× S5 from semiclassical approximation,” JHEP 05 (2007), 051 [arXiv:hep-th/0703061 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,

    S. J. Rey and J. T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379 [arXiv:hep-th/9803001]

    2001 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Wilson loops in large N field theories,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859 [arXiv:hep-th/9803002]

    1998 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Holography of Non-relativistic S tring on AdS 5× S5,

    M. Sakaguchi and K. Yoshida, “Holography of Non-relativistic S tring on AdS 5× S5,” JHEP 02 (2008), 092 [arXiv:0712.4112 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    All-genus calculation of Wilson loops using D -branes,

    N. Drukker and B. Fiol, “All-genus calculation of Wilson loops using D -branes,” JHEP 02 (2005), 010 [arXiv:hep-th/0501109 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Wilson loops of anti-symmetric representation a nd D5-branes,

    S. Yamaguchi, “Wilson loops of anti-symmetric representation a nd D5-branes,” JHEP 05 (2006), 037 [arXiv:hep-th/0603208 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Holographic Wilson Loops,

    J. Gomis and F. Passerini, “Holographic Wilson Loops,” JHEP 08 (2006), 074 [arXiv:hep-th/0604007 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Wilson Loops as D3-Branes,

    J. Gomis and F. Passerini, “Wilson Loops as D3-Branes,” JHEP 01 (2007), 097 [arXiv:hep-th/0612022 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Holography and def ect conformal field theories,

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman and H. Ooguri, “Holography and def ect conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002), 025009 [arXiv:hep-th/0111135 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Exploring improved holographic theor ies for QCD: Part I,

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theor ies for QCD: Part I,” JHEP 02 (2008), 032 [arXiv:0707.1324 [hep-th]]. 21

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Exploring improved holograph ic theories for QCD: Part II,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holograph ic theories for QCD: Part II,” JHEP 02 (2008), 019 [arXiv:0707.1349 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    A Hidden Symmetry of AdS Resonance s,

    O. Evnin and C. Krishnan, “A Hidden Symmetry of AdS Resonance s,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.12, 126010 [arXiv:1502.03749 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A Saddle Point Solution in the W einberg-Salam Theory,

    F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, “A Saddle Point Solution in the W einberg-Salam Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984), 221

    1984

  20. [28]

    Simplest oscillon and its s phaleron,

    N. S. Manton and T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, “Simplest oscillon and its s phaleron,” Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.8, 085012 [arXiv:2301.09660 [hep-th]]. 22

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.