Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Can solvents tie knots? Helical folds of biopolymers in liquid environments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By simulating the folding of a short flexible tube in a hard-sphere solvent, this paper establishes that the solvent alone can select the polymer's shape—producing symmetric double helices and, in a large region of fluid parameters, an…

desk verdict Genuinely new computational result, but the 'solvent ties a knot' claim outruns the optimization evidence; worth reviewing with convergence controls requested. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20181 v2 pith:SAPCUCNX submitted 2024-12-28 cond-mat.soft math.GT

Rhoslyn Coles , Myfanwy E. Evans This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softmath.GT
keywords solvationfreeenergymorphometricapproachbiopolymerfoldingdoublehelixoverhandknothard-spherefluidphasediagramsimulatedannealing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the surrounding solvent, by itself, can determine the folded shape of a biopolymer-like tube. Using the morphometric approach to solvation, the authors simulate a short, homogeneous, self-avoiding tube that carries no bending stiffness or sequence-specific interactions; the only drive is the free energy of the hard-sphere fluid in which it sits. They find that different solvent conditions select different geometries: a compact crossing structure, a symmetric double helix, and an overhand knot. The central claim is that in a large region of the solvent phase diagram the double helix and the overhand knot are the global free-energy minima, more stable than the tight alpha-helix motif associated with proteins. If true, this means a fluid environment can not only shape but also topologically tie a simple polymer, offering a physical basis for knotted biopolymers.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the morphometric approach to solvation combined with a free-folding optimization. In that approach the solvation free energy is a linear combination of four geometric measures of the solvent-accessible surface, $F_{\mathrm{sol}} = pV + \sigma A + \kappa C + \bar{\kappa} X$, justified by Hadwiger's characterization of rigid-motion invariant valuations; the coefficients $p$, $\sigma$, $\kappa$, $\bar{\kappa}$ are thermodynamic properties of the fluid and are here derived for a hard-sphere solvent as explicit functions of packing fraction $\eta$ and solvent radius $r_s$. The shape is an open equilateral polygonal tube with 101 vertices and length $\ell=25$, kept self-avoiding through the simple-tube property, and folded by parallel simulated annealing with crankshaft moves. This setup removes all configurational bias—there is no bending energy or polymer stiffness—so the observed double helix and knot are selected purely by the geometry–thermodynamics coupling.

What would settle it

Re-optimize the same tube at a fluid condition inside region C (for example $\eta \approx 0.4$, $r_s \approx 0.03$) starting from many independent initial states—fully extended, random coil, and pre-formed alternative knots—with a substantially longer annealing schedule or a different global optimizer; if any configuration has a lower solvation free energy than the overhand knot, the phase diagram's assignment fails. A cheaper check is to compute $F_{\mathrm{sol}}$ for other candidate shapes, such as a trefoil knot tied in the open chain or a tighter globular packing, at the same parameters and compare.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' terms, the discovery is that solvation alone—no intramolecular forces, no bending energy—drives a short flexible tube of length $\ell=25$ and unit radius to fold into distinct helical motifs. The phase diagram over solvent packing fraction $\eta$ and solvent radius $r_s$ splits into three regions: a compact geometry (A), a symmetric double helix with the string folded back on itself (B), and an overhand knot (C). At fixed solvent radius, energy profiles show that as the fluid becomes denser the double helix and overhand knot sink well below the tight helical curves, including the configuration corresponding to the protein $\alpha$-helix. The paper therefore claims thermodynamic stability for the overhand knot and double helix in solution, and interprets this as evidence that the solvent can drive fundamental rearrangements up to tying a simple knot.

Load-bearing premise

The search reliably finds the true lowest-energy shape for every point in the phase diagram, so the three regions really are the global minimizers; the authors themselves note that for solvent radius below 0.04 the runs were initialized close to already-known folded structures, which weakens reliability in exactly the region where the overhand knot is claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Solvent conditions alone can determine a polymer's topology, implying that knotting in biopolymers need not require sequence-specific or active mechanisms.
  • The protein alpha-helix is not the solvation-free-energy minimum for short strings, so the prevalence of alpha-helices must be attributed to intramolecular forces such as hydrogen bonding rather than to the aqueous environment.
  • The overhand knot's thermodynamic stability provides a concrete physical route by which knotted configurations arise in biopolymers.
  • Because fluid parameters select between double helix and knot, the same polymer can behave as if flexible or stiff depending on its solvent, offering a mechanism for solvent-actuated shape change.
  • The phase diagram gives a mapping from measurable fluid properties to the preferred fold, which could guide experiments on crowding agents or co-solutes that push a biopolymer into a knot or double helix.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This result suggests a generic mechanism: any sufficiently long chain in a strongly excluding, hard-sphere-like environment may tend to knot even without attractive interactions between monomers; testing this with longer tubes would show whether a critical length for solvent-driven knotting exists.
  • The morphometric coefficients used here are specific to hard-sphere fluids; running the same free-folding simulation with coefficients fitted to water-like models would test whether the knot and double-helix regions survive in more realistic solvents.
  • The stability of the overhand knot at small solvent radius hints that molecular crowding, which effectively raises packing fraction, could be a controllable switch for knotting in laboratory polymer systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents computer experiments in which a short flexible tube (length ℓ=25, discretized as an equilateral polygon) is folded by minimizing the morphometric solvation free energy (Eq. 1) with hard-sphere solvent coefficients from the White Bear mark II DFT (Eqs. 3-6). A phase diagram over solvent packing fraction η and solvent radius rs is constructed from simulated-annealing runs, yielding three empirically classified geometries: compact (A), double helix (B), and overhand knot (C). The authors claim that the solvent alone can drive folding up to tying an overhand knot, and that B and C are more stable than the optimal tight helix in large regions of the phase diagram. The supplement derives exact formulas for the four geometric measures of a simple tubular string (Proposition 0.1).

Significance. The question addressed—whether an implicit solvation free energy can select non-trivial topologies such as knots and double helices for a homogeneous flexible tube—is novel and potentially significant for understanding solvent contributions to biopolymer folding. The modeling setup is clean: the morphometric coefficients are externally given, the tube is free to fold without a helical ansatz, and the geometric derivation in the supplement is clear and appears broadly correct. The work also ships open-source code, which aids reproducibility. However, the central claim of global stability of the knot and double helix rests on a heuristic optimization whose reliability in the relevant parameter region is explicitly called into question by the authors; as it stands, the evidence supports these configurations as low-energy states reachable from biased starts, not as proven global minima.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1.2 (Discussion) and Fig. 4] The central claim that configuration C (overhand knot) is the most stable structure in the large region of the phase diagram is not supported for the parameter range in which it is made. The paper states that for rs < 0.04 'experiments were initialised in configurations similar to the early experiment structures shown in Fig. 2' and that this 'effects the reliability of the results in the corresponding regions of the phase diagram.' Since region C appears precisely for small solvent radius across all packing fractions, the optimization in that region is biased toward the basin of the initialization, and the possibility that other initializations would find lower-energy configurations is left open. The authors should provide control runs with unbiased initializations (e.g., straight tube or random coil) and multiple independent seeds for the (η, rs) points in region C, or at least demonstrate that the final configuration and energy are independent of the starting state for those conditions.
  2. [Section 1.1 and Fig. 5] The energy profiles and phase boundaries are presented without uncertainty quantification. The curves in Fig. 5 are single example shapes from each empirical class, with no error bars, no number of replicas, and no measure of within-class variation. Given the authors' own statement that energy differences at low packing fraction are marginal, the phase boundaries at low η are not statistically robust, and the wording 'proving more stable than the optimal helix seen in protein alpha-helices' overstates the evidence, since the comparison is limited to a small family of tight helical curves and no global minimization over all admissible shapes is certified.
  3. [Section 1.3 (Methods)] The simulated-annealing protocol is not specified to a degree that allows assessment of convergence. The manuscript gives a runtime of about 20 hours per interval and an approximate upper bound of 10^6 steps, but does not report the cooling schedule, the total number of iterations, the number of independent runs per (η, rs) point, or any energy-versus-iteration convergence diagnostics. Because moves that violate the simple-tube property are discarded, the move set is not obviously ergodic, so the final configuration may depend on the initial curve. This lack of convergence evidence is load-bearing for the global-minimum interpretation of the phase diagram.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplementary, proof of Proposition 0.1] In the volume calculation, the term '2π/3 (r - e/2)^2 (2r - e/2)' should read '2π/3 (r - e/2)^2 (2r + e/2)' (and the first term should be '4π/3 r^3'); the stated final formula is correct with the plus sign.
  2. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 captions] The captions for Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 are incomplete: each ends with 'the solvent radius' without giving the value.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'this effects the reliability' should be 'this affects the reliability'; 'persepctive' should be 'perspective'; 'metropolis criterium' should be 'Metropolis criterion'; and in the supplement 'this is is not seen' should be 'this is not seen'.
  4. [References] Reference [31] is cited as J. Phys. Chem. B 103.22 (1990), but the article (Lum, Chandler, and Weeks) was published in 1999; please correct the year.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'Assembly of the helical biopolymers' reads awkwardly; consider 'Assembly of helical biopolymer structures'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the morphometric energy model and its coefficients are external inputs, and the knot and double-helix outcomes are unconstrained simulation outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the morphometric solvation free energy (Eq. 1) with coefficients p, sigma, kappa, and bar-kappa supplied by the external hard-sphere DFT of Hansen-Goos and Roth (ref [18]); the solute is a fixed-length self-avoiding tube with no prescribed fold (Methods, Eq. 2). The claim that solvent conditions stabilize an overhand knot or double helix is obtained by simulated annealing over crankshaft moves minimizing Fsol; no parameter is fitted to reproduce the reported configurations, and the phase diagram is populated by energy evaluation and empirical classification, not by construction. The tight-helix family from refs [19, 47] is used only as a comparison set, and the cited ropelength and thickness results are standard external mathematics. The one self-citation (ref [14], Evans and Roth) merely illustrates prior uses of the morphometric approach and is not load-bearing. The authors' own caveat that low rs and high eta runs were initialized near early folding structures and may affect reliability is a convergence and global-minimization concern, not a circularity: even a biased search still evaluates the true energy function, and a failure to certify global optimality would weaken the 'most stable' claim empirically rather than make it true by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the morphometric solvation model (Eq 1) and the hard-sphere coefficients (Eq 3), both taken from prior literature, plus the simulation's ability to find minima. No new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced; the only chosen input is the tube length and discretization.

free parameters (1)
  • Tube length ℓ = 25 (n=101, e=0.25, rt=1.00778) = 25/rt = 24.8065 (chosen, not fitted)
    The string length is a modeling choice set for computational feasibility and comparison with prior tight-helix geometries; the authors note that a length study is needed and is inhibited by computation time, so results may depend on this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Solvation free energy is exactly a linear combination of volume, surface area, mean curvature, and Gaussian curvature measures (Eq 1).
    Invoked at Eq (1); this is the standard morphometric approximation from refs [27, 49], not derived within this paper.
  • domain assumption The coefficients p, σ, κ, κ̄ for a hard-sphere solvent are given by the White Bear mark II density functional theory (Eq 3).
    Taken from Hansen-Goos and Roth [18]; these formulas model the aqueous environment under physiological conditions and are not validated by experiment for this tube system.
  • domain assumption Self-avoidance is enforced by the discrete simple-tube property (condition 2) for radius rt, which fixes the solute volume.
    Used to define physical arrangements of the solute; the proposition in the supplement gives the measures, but the property is a geometric idealization of polymer excluded volume.
  • domain assumption Simulated annealing with crankshaft deformations and parallel tempering finds the global minimum of the solvation free energy.
    The paper does not provide convergence guarantees; the authors note computation time and initialization issues, so this is assumed.
  • standard math Hadwiger's characterization theorem and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem justify the use of the four geometric measures and the value X = 4πχ.
    Standard results in integral geometry, cited in the introduction and used in the supplementary derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can solvents tie knots? Helical folds of biopolymers in liquid environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAPCUCNX

@misc{pith2026241220181,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can solvents tie knots? Helical folds of biopolymers in liquid environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAPCUCNX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20181}
}
read the original abstract

Helices are the quintessential geometric motif of the microscale, from alpha-helices in proteins to double helices in DNA. Assembly of the helical geometry of biopolymers is a foundational step in a hierarchy of structure that eventually leads to biological activity. By simulating folding in a simplified setting we probe the role of the solvent in the collaborative processes governing biomaterials. Using a simulation technique based on the morphometric approach to solvation, we performed computer experiments in which a short, flexible tube-modelling a biopolymer in an aqueous environment-folds solely based on the interaction of the tube with the solvent. Our findings reveal a variety of helical structures that assemble depending on solvent conditions, including overhand knots and symmetric double helices. By differentiating the role of solvation, our work illuminates the environment of all soluble biomolecules, demonstrating that the solvent can drive fundamental rearrangements, even up to tying a simple overhand knot.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Helical Tubes in Crowded Environments

    Y. Snir and R. D. Kamien. “Helical Tubes in Crowded Environments”. In: Phys. Rev. E 75 (5 2007), p. 051114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.051114

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.75.051114 2007

  2. [1]

    Knotting matters: orderly molecular entanglements

    Z. Ashbridge et al. “Knotting matters: orderly molecular entanglements”. In: Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (18 2022), pp. 7779–7809. doi: 10.1039/d2cs00323f

    work page doi:10.1039/d2cs00323f 2022

  3. [2]

    Water as an Active Constituent in Cell Biology

    P. Ball. “Water as an Active Constituent in Cell Biology”. In: Chem. Rev. 108.1 (2008), pp. 74–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068037a

    work page doi:10.1021/cr068037a 2008

  4. [3]

    Structural motifs of biomolecules

    J. R. Banavar et al. “Structural motifs of biomolecules”. In: PNAS 104.44 (2007), pp. 17283–17286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704594104. url: https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0704594104

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0704594104 2007

  5. [4]

    Free Energy Landscape and Dynamics of Supercoiled DNA by High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy

    T. Brouns et al. “Free Energy Landscape and Dynamics of Supercoiled DNA by High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy”. In: ACS Nano 12.12 (2018), pp. 11907– 11916. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06994

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b06994 2018

  6. [5]

    On the minimum ropelength of knots and links

    J. Cantarella, R. B. Kusner, and J. M. Sullivan. “On the minimum ropelength of knots and links”. In: J. Invent. Math. 150.2 (2002), pp. 257–286. doi: 10.1007/ s00222-002-0234-y

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Solvent effects on the collapse dynamics of poly- mers

    R. Chang and A. Yethiraj. “Solvent effects on the collapse dynamics of poly- mers”. In: J. Chem. Phys. 114 (17 2001), pp. 7688–7699. doi: 10 . 1063 / 1 . 1361071

    work page 2001

  8. [7]

    Emergence of secondary motifs in tubelike polymers in a sol- vent

    P. Chiara et al. “Emergence of secondary motifs in tubelike polymers in a sol- vent”. In: Phys. Rev. E 77.6 (2008), p. 061804. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevE . 77 . 061804. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.061804

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.77.061804 2008

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    R. Coles. disSolve. https://github.com/rhocoles/disSolve.git. 2024

    2024

  2. [9]

    Developing the tube theory for polymer knots

    L. Dai. “Developing the tube theory for polymer knots”. In: Phys.Rev. Research 2 (2 2020), p. 022014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022014. url: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022014

    2020 doi

  3. [10]

    Protein Folding and Misfolding

    M. C Dobson. “Protein Folding and Misfolding”. In: Nature 426 (2003), pp. 884–

    2003

  4. [11]

    The Union of Balls and Its Dual Shape

    H. Edelsbrunner. “The Union of Balls and Its Dual Shape”. In: Discrete Com- put. Geom. 13.3 (1995), pp. 415–440. doi: 10 .1007 /BF02574053. url: https : //doi.org/10.1007/BF02574053

    1995 doi

  5. [12]

    The Geometry of Biomolecular Solvation

    H. Edelsbrunner and P. Koehl. “The Geometry of Biomolecular Solvation”. In: Combinatorial and Computational Geometry . Vol. 52. MSRI Book Series. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 243–275

    2005

  6. [13]

    Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding

    D. Eisenberg and A. D. McLachlan. “Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding”. In: Nature 319 (1986), pp. 199–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ 319199a0. 14

    1986

  7. [14]

    Shaping the Skin: The Interplay of Mesoscale Geom- etry and Corneocyte Swelling

    M. E. Evans and R. Roth. “Shaping the Skin: The Interplay of Mesoscale Geom- etry and Corneocyte Swelling”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 112.3 (2014), p. 038102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.038102

    2014 doi

  8. [15]

    Global curvature, thickness, and the ideal shapes of knots

    O. Gonzalez and J. H. Maddocks. “Global curvature, thickness, and the ideal shapes of knots”. In: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96.9 (1999), pp. 4769–4773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4769. url: https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/ pnas.96.9.4769

    1999 doi

  9. [16]

    Mechanics of two filaments in tight orthogonal con- tact

    Paul Grandgeorge et al. “Mechanics of two filaments in tight orthogonal con- tact”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118.15 (2021), e2021684118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021684118. url: https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2021684118

    2021 doi

  10. [17]

    Hadwiger

    H. Hadwiger. Vorlesungen ¨Uber Inhalt, Geometrie, Oberfl¨ ache und Isoperime- trie. Vol. 93. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1957. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 642- 94702-5

    1957 doi

  11. [18]

    Density functional theory for hard–sphere mix- tures: The White Bear version mark II

    H. Hansen-Goos and R. Roth. “Density functional theory for hard–sphere mix- tures: The White Bear version mark II”. In:J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 (2006), pp. 8413–8425. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/37/002

    2006 doi

  12. [20]

    A morphometric approach for the accurate solvation thermodynamics of proteins and ligands

    Yuichi Harano, Roland Roth, and Shuntaro Chiba. “A morphometric approach for the accurate solvation thermodynamics of proteins and ligands”. In: Journal of Computational Chemistry 34.23 (2013), pp. 1969–1974. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jcc.23348. eprint: https://onlinelibra...

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA

    R. Irobalieva et al. “Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA”. In: Nat Commun 6 (2015), p. 8440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9440

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    The shapes of physical trefoil knots

    Paul Johanns et al. “The shapes of physical trefoil knots”. In: Extreme Mechanics Letters 43 (2021), p. 101172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101172. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352431621000043

    2021

  15. [23]

    Stability of secondary structural elements in a solvent–free environment: the alpha Helix

    I. A. Kaltashov and C. Fenselau. “Stability of secondary structural elements in a solvent–free environment: the alpha Helix”. In: Proteins 27.2 (1997), pp. 165–

    1997

  16. [24]

    The generic geometry of helices and their close-packed structures

    O. Kasper and J. Bohr. “The generic geometry of helices and their close-packed structures”. In: Theor. Chem. Acc 125 (2009), pp. 207–215. doi: 0.1007/s00214- 009-0639-4

    2009

  17. [25]

    Geometry and physics of knots

    V. Katritch et al. “Geometry and physics of knots”. In: Nature 384 (1996), pp. 142–145. doi: 10.1038/384142a0

    1996 doi

  18. [26]

    Derivatives of Molecular Surface Area and Volume: Simple and Exact Analytical Formulas

    K. V. Klenin et al. “Derivatives of Molecular Surface Area and Volume: Simple and Exact Analytical Formulas”. In: J. Comput. Chem. 32 (2011), pp. 2647–

    2011

  19. [27]

    Morphological Thermodynamics of Fluids: Shape Dependence of Free Energies

    P. M. K¨ onig, R. Roth, and K. R. Mecke. “Morphological Thermodynamics of Fluids: Shape Dependence of Free Energies”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 93.16 (2004), p. 160601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.160601

    2004 doi

  20. [28]

    The Interpretation of Protein Structures: Estima- tion of Static Accessibility

    B. Lee and F. M. Richards. “The Interpretation of Protein Structures: Estima- tion of Static Accessibility”. In: J. Mol. Biol. 55.3 (1971), pp. 379–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X

    1971 doi

  21. [29]

    Thickness of knots

    R. A. Litherland et al. “Thickness of knots”. In: Topol. Appl. 91.3 (1999), pp. 233–244. doi: 10.1016/S0166-8641(97)00210-1

    1999 doi

  22. [31]

    Hydrophobicity at Small and Large Length Scales

    K. Lum, D. Chandler, and J. D. Weeks. “Hydrophobicity at Small and Large Length Scales”. In: J. Phys. Chem. B. 103.22 (1990), pp. 4570–4577. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1021/jp984327m

    1990 doi

  23. [32]

    Integral and Current Representation of Federer’s Curvature Mea- sures

    Z¨ ahle M. “Integral and Current Representation of Federer’s Curvature Mea- sures”. In: Arch. Math 44 (1986), pp. 557–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01195026

    1986

  24. [33]

    Kinetics of polymer collapse: effect of temperature on cluster growth and aging

    S. Majumder, J. Zierenberg, and W. Janke. “Kinetics of polymer collapse: effect of temperature on cluster growth and aging”. In: Soft Matter 13 (6 2017), pp. 1276–1290. doi: 10.1039/C6SM02197B

    2017 doi

  25. [34]

    Knots are Generic Stable Phases in Semiflexible Polymers

    S. Majumder et al. “Knots are Generic Stable Phases in Semiflexible Polymers”. In: Macromolecules 54.12 (2021), pp. 5321–5334. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol. 0c02584

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    DNA–DNA interactions in bacteriophage capsids are responsible for the observed DNA knotting

    Davide Marenduzzo et al. “DNA–DNA interactions in bacteriophage capsids are responsible for the observed DNA knotting”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106.52 (2009), pp. 22269–22274. doi: 10 . 1073 / pnas . 0907524106. eprint: https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/...

    2009 doi

  27. [36]

    Knots as a Topological Order Parameter for Semi- flexible Polymers

    M. Marenz and W. Janke. “Knots as a Topological Order Parameter for Semi- flexible Polymers”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (12 2016), p. 128301. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.128301. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 116.128301

    2016 doi

  28. [37]

    Optimal Shapes of Compact Strings

    A. Maritan et al. “Optimal Shapes of Compact Strings.” In: Nature 406 (2000), pp. 287–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/35018538

    2000 doi

  29. [38]

    A morphological model for complex fluids

    K R Mecke. “A morphological model for complex fluids”. In: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 8.47 (1996), p. 9663. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/8/47/080. url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/8/47/080

    1996 doi

  30. [39]

    Energy, ropelength, and other physical aspects of equilateral knots

    K. Millett and E .J. Rawdon. “Energy, ropelength, and other physical aspects of equilateral knots”. In: J. C. P. 186.2 (2003), pp. 426–456. doi: 10.1016/S0021- 9991(03)00026-3

    2003 doi

  31. [40]

    Collapse of semiflexible polymer in a poor solvent

    A. Montesi, M. Pasquali, and C. MacKintosh. “Collapse of semiflexible polymer in a poor solvent”. In: Phys. Rev. E. 69 (2 2004), p. 021916. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevE.69.021916. 16

    2004

  32. [41]

    Inclusion–Exclusion–Bonferroni Identities and Inequalities for Discrete Tube–Like Problems via Euler Characteristics

    D. Q. Naiman and H. P. Wynn. “Inclusion–Exclusion–Bonferroni Identities and Inequalities for Discrete Tube–Like Problems via Euler Characteristics”. In: Ann. Statist. 20.1 (1992), pp. 43–76. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176348512

    1992

  33. [42]

    Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules

    A. V. Onufriev and D. A. Case. “Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules.” In: Annu Rev Biophys. 48 (2019), pp. 275–296. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-biophys-052118-115325

    2019

  34. [43]

    Water models for biomolecular simulations

    A. V. Onufriev and S. Izadi. “Water models for biomolecular simulations”. In: WIREs Comp. Mol. Sci 8.2 (2018), e1347. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1347

    2018 doi

  35. [44]

    Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides

    T Ooi et al. “Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84.10 (1987), pp. 3086–3090. issn: 0027-8424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3086. url: h...

    1987 doi

  36. [45]

    Simulation of short–chain polymer collapse with an explicit solvent

    J. M. Polson and M. J. Zuckermann. “Simulation of short–chain polymer collapse with an explicit solvent”. In: J. Chem. Phys. 116.16 (2002), pp. 7244–7249. doi: 10.1063/1.1464819

    2002 doi

  37. [46]

    Role of water in the formation of macro- molecular structures

    P.L. Privalov and C. Crane-Robinson. “Role of water in the formation of macro- molecular structures”. In: Eur, Biophys, J. 46 (2017), pp. 203–224. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00249-016-1161-y

    2017 doi

  38. [47]

    Helical close packings of ideal ropes

    S. Przyby l and P. Piera´ nski. “Helical close packings of ideal ropes”. In: Eur. Phys. J. E 4 (2001), pp. 445–449. doi: 10.1007/s101890170099

    2001 doi

  39. [48]

    Can Computers Discover Ideal Knots?

    E. J. Rawdon. “Can Computers Discover Ideal Knots?” In: Experiment. Math. 12.3 (2003), pp. 287–302. doi: 10.1080/10586458.2003.10504499

    2003

  40. [49]

    Morphometric Approach to the Sol- vation Free Energy of Complex Molecules

    R. Roth, Y. Harano, and M. Kinoshita. “Morphometric Approach to the Sol- vation Free Energy of Complex Molecules”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 97.7 (2006), p. 078101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.078101

    2006 doi

  41. [50]

    Implicit solvent models

    B Roux and T Simonson. “Implicit solvent models”. en. In: Biophys. Chem. 78.1-2 (1999), pp. 1–20

    1999

  42. [51]

    Effective Interactions Cannot Replace Solvent Effects in a Lattice Model of Proteins

    G. Salvi and P. De Los Rios. “Effective Interactions Cannot Replace Solvent Effects in a Lattice Model of Proteins”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 91.25 (2003), p. 258102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.258102

    2003 doi

  43. [52]

    To knot or not to knot?

    Eugene Shakhnovich. “To knot or not to knot?” In: Nature Materials 10.2 (2011), pp. 84–86. doi: 10.1038/nmat2953. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2953

    2011 doi

  44. [53]

    Solvation Free Energies Estimated from Macroscopic Continuum Theory: An Accuracy Assessment

    Thomas Simonson and Axel T. Bruenger. “Solvation Free Energies Estimated from Macroscopic Continuum Theory: An Accuracy Assessment”. In: The Journal of Physical Chemistry 98.17 (1994), pp. 4683–4694. doi: 10 . 1021 / j100068a033. url: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100068a033

    1994 doi

  45. [55]

    Exotic self-assembly of hard spheres in a morphometric solvent

    Ivan Spirandelli et al. “Exotic self-assembly of hard spheres in a morphometric solvent”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121.15 (2024), e2314959121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2314959121. eprint: https://www.pnas.org/ doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2314959121. url: https://w...

    2024 doi

  46. [56]

    Electrophoretic mobility of DNA knots

    A. Stasiak et al. “Electrophoretic mobility of DNA knots”. In: Nature 384.6605 (1996), p. 122. doi: 10.1038/384122a0

    1996 doi

  47. [57]

    On folding of entangled proteins: knots, lassos, links and theta– curves

    J. I. Su lkowska. “On folding of entangled proteins: knots, lassos, links and theta– curves”. In: Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 60 (2020), pp. 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j. sbi.2020.01.007

    2020 doi

  48. [58]

    Tezuka and T

    Y. Tezuka and T. Deguchi, eds. Topological Polymer Chemistry. Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. isbn: 978-981-16-6807-4. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-6807-4

    2022 doi

  49. [59]

    On the Pseudo Phase Diagram of Single Semi-Flexible Polymer Chains: A Flat-Histogram Monte Carlo Study

    B. Werlich et al. “On the Pseudo Phase Diagram of Single Semi-Flexible Polymer Chains: A Flat-Histogram Monte Carlo Study”. In: Polymers 9.38 (2 2017). doi: 10.3390/polym9020038

    2017 doi

  50. [60]

    Water Mediation in Protein Folding and Molecular Recognition

    Y. Levy and J. N. Onuchic. “Water Mediation in Protein Folding and Molecular Recognition”. In: Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35 (2006), pp. 389–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102134. 18 Supplementary Materials Investigation of tight helical curves from the p...

    2006

  51. [170]

    doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199702)27:2 ⟨165::aid-prot2⟩3.0.co;2-f

    doi

  52. [890]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02261

    doi: 10.1038/nature02261. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02261

    doi

  53. [2653]

    doi: 10.1002/jcc.21844. 15

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.