Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Transport coefficients of dense nucleon matter at low temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For cold dense matter, a positive bulk viscosity forces a new sign constraint on the thermodynamic potential that is independent of the usual stability conditions.

desk verdict A clean shear-viscosity derivation and a solid Walecka-model application, but the advertised bulk-viscosity sign constraint rests on an unjustified replacement of the sound speed and is not established. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20454 v2 pith:PWVG33ZA submitted 2024-12-29 nucl-th cond-mat.str-elhep-phhep-th

Jianing Li , Weiyao Ke This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thcond-mat.str-elhep-phhep-th
keywords bulkviscosityshearFermiliquidtheoryrelaxationtimeapproximationWaleckamodelcolddensenuclearmattertransportcoefficientsthermodynamicstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the shear and bulk viscosities of cold fermionic matter in the regime $T/\mu_B \ll 1$, where nucleons are described as Fermi-liquid quasiparticles with effective mass $m^*$ and effective baryon chemical potential $\mu^*$ set by scalar and vector condensates. Working in the relaxation time approximation, the paper derives explicit formulas in which $\eta$ and $\zeta$ are fixed by the quasiparticle Fermi momentum, the relaxation time, and second derivatives of the mean-field effective potential $\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}$ with respect to the two condensates. The central result is that a positive bulk viscosity, $\zeta>0$, requires the sign combination in Eq. (33) to hold, which the paper claims is a new constraint on the thermodynamic potential, separate from the usual Hessian stability conditions. Applied to the Walecka model, the constraint restricts the stable density range to $n_B\lesssim 6\,n_{\mathrm{sat}}$ and predicts that the bulk viscosity is about twice the shear viscosity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the derivative $dm^*/d\mu^*$ — the rate at which the quasiparticle effective mass changes with the effective chemical potential — obtained from the gap equations of the mean-field effective potential $\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}(\mu;\bar\sigma,\bar\omega_0)$. Through Eq. (31), this derivative is expressed as $-\,f'(\bar\sigma)/g'(\bar\omega_0)$ times the ratio of the mixed curvature $\partial^2\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}/\partial\bar\omega_0\partial\bar\sigma$ to the scalar curvature $\partial^2\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}/\partial\bar\sigma^2$, and that same ratio controls the bulk viscosity in Eq. (32b). The relaxation time $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}$, computed from leading-order $2\leftrightarrow 2$ quasiparticle scattering via $\sigma$ and $\omega$ meson fluctuations, sets the overall scale of both viscosities, while the free-gas speed-of-sound identity (23) is used to simplify the bulk-viscosity integrand.

What would settle it

Recompute $\zeta$ for the Walecka model using the full mean-field speed of sound $v_s^2=dp/d\varepsilon$ from the pressure (46) and energy density (64) instead of the free-gas value (23), and check whether the sign combination in Eq. (33) is still necessary for $\zeta>0$; if it is not, the claimed constraint is an artifact of that substitution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for a cold, dense Fermi liquid whose quasiparticles are dressed by scalar and vector condensates ($m^*=m+f(\bar\sigma)$, $\mu^*=\mu+g(\bar\omega_0)$), the relaxation-time approximation to the Boltzmann equation yields closed-form transport coefficients: $\eta = p_F^{*5}/(30\pi^2\mu^*)\,\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}$ and $\zeta = -\,p_F^{*5}/(18\pi^2\mu^*)\,[m^* f'(\bar\sigma)/(\mu^* g'(\bar\omega_0))]\,(\partial^2\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}/\partial\bar\omega_0\partial\bar\sigma)\,(\partial^2\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}/\partial\bar\sigma^2)^{-1}\,\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}$. Because a positive bulk viscosity is required for irreversible, entropy-producing (and hence stable) dissipative dynamics, the combination of effective-potential derivatives entering $\zeta$ must satisfy Eq. (33), a condition the paper argues is independent of the standard thermodynamic stability conditions (positive-definite Hessian of $\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}$). In the Walecka model, imposing this condition restricts the model to baryon densities below roughly $6\,n_{\mathrm{sat}}$, and the resulting dimensionless bulk viscosity is approximately twice the shear viscosity.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the speed of sound of the interacting system is the free Fermi gas value $v_s^2=(1/3)(1-m^{*2}/\mu^{*2})$, even though the physical speed of sound in the Walecka application is $dp/d\varepsilon$ of the mean-field pressure and energy density that include condensate contributions; the bulk-viscosity formula (32b) and the sign condition (33) rely on that substitution, and no proof of equality is given.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any mean-field model with scalar and vector condensates, the low-temperature bulk viscosity is fixed (up to $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}$) by the curvature ratio of $\bar V_{\mathrm{eff}}$, so transport calculations become a direct probe of the effective potential.
  • Hydrodynamic stability can be used as a model-selection criterion: a mean-field model that passes the Hessian tests of Eq. (27) but violates Eq. (33) cannot support a stable dissipative fluid description.
  • For the Walecka model parameter set used here, both viscosities scale as $p_F^*/(\pi\bar h_W)$ at leading order, with $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}\sim \mu_B^*/(\pi T)^2$, so the viscosities grow as $1/T^2$ at low temperature.
  • The predicted hierarchy $\zeta\approx 2\eta$ implies that volumetric deformations are damped roughly twice as strongly as shear deformations in cold dense nucleon matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the independence of Eq. (33) from the Hessian conditions is an artifact of the relaxation-time approximation (a possibility the paper itself raises), then a full linearized-Boltzmann solution for the same Walecka model should restore $\zeta>0$ wherever the thermodynamic stability conditions hold; this is a direct test of the paper's central claim.
  • The same curvature ratio that sets the sign of $\zeta$ also controls $dm^*/d\mu^*$, so the constraint could be checked indirectly through observables sensitive to the effective mass, such as the density dependence of the symmetry energy or quasiparticle masses extracted from nuclear structure or heavy-ion data, without measuring bulk viscosity directly.
  • Extending the relaxation-time machinery from the strong-interaction viscosity considered here to weak-interaction processes would connect this transport framework to neutron-star phenomena such as r-mode damping and cooling, where the long-timescale bulk viscosity is set by weak reactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a relaxation-time-approximation (RTA) treatment of the Boltzmann equation for cold, dense fermionic matter with scalar and vector condensates, and derives expressions for shear viscosity η and bulk viscosity ζ at leading order in T/μ. The central advertised result is that positivity of ζ imposes a constraint, Eq. (33), on the thermodynamic potential that is independent of the usual stability conditions. The authors apply the formalism to the Walecka model, computing the relaxation time from tree-level σ/ω exchange amplitudes by Monte Carlo integration, and they present enthalpy-scaled viscosities as functions of density.

Significance. If the central derivation were correct, the proposed link between the sign of the bulk viscosity and the curvature of the effective potential would be a novel and useful cross-check for effective models of dense matter. The paper has genuine strengths: the relaxation time is computed from explicit microscopic amplitudes rather than adjusted to reproduce the viscosities, the numerical work (homotopy gap-solution search, Monte Carlo phase-space integration) is substantial, and the authors explicitly disclose the possibility that the sign constraint is an RTA artifact. However, the main new result is not established in the submitted form because the derivation of the simplified bulk-viscosity formula and the sign constraint rests on an unjustified replacement of the thermodynamic speed of sound by the free Fermi gas value, and the quantitative 'physical region' in the Walecka application is affected by an apparent algebraic inconsistency.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.B, Eqs. (19b), (23), (24), (32b), (33)] The reduction of φ2 to Eq. (24) inserts the free Fermi gas speed of sound v_s^2 = (1/3)(1 - m*^2/μ*^2) from Eq. (23) into Eq. (19b). In the Boltzmann derivation, v_s^2 is the thermodynamic dp/dε of the full system (Eq. (15)); for the Walecka application that quantity is computed from the mean-field pressure (46) and energy density (64), which contain condensate contributions and are not equal to the free Fermi gas expression. No justification is given for the substitution, and Fig. 3(c) itself shows a v_s^2 that deviates from the free gas benchmark. As a result, the simplified φ2 in Eq. (24), the bulk viscosity formula (32b), and the sign constraint (33) do not follow from Eqs. (19b)-(21b); additional terms involving the full v_s^2 survive in φ2. This gap is load-bearing because Eq. (33) is the headline new result of the paper.
  2. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (50) and (51a)] The denominator of Eq. (50), which defines the 'physical region' used in Figs. 3-6, contains -(3/2) g_σ^2 m_N^* cosh^{-1}(μ_B^*/m_N^*), whereas Eq. (51a) multiplied by π^2 gives -3 g_σ^2 m_N^{*2} cosh^{-1}(μ_B^*/m_N^*). One factor of m_N^* and a factor of 2 are missing. Since positivity of Eq. (50) determines the brown shaded physical region in the figures, the quantitative stability boundary and the conclusions drawn from it are additionally uncertain.
  3. [Sec. II.B, passage following Eq. (33)] The authors state that the new constraint may be an artifact of the RTA and that a beyond-RTA analysis is left to future work. In view of this caveat and the v_s^2 issue, the claim that ζ > 0 imposes an independent constraint on the thermodynamic potential is presented as an established result even though the manuscript itself provides concrete grounds to doubt it. The claim should be reformulated as a conditional observation, or supported by a calculation that goes beyond the RTA, before it can be regarded as a robust finding.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption and Sec. III.A] The quantity labeled v_s^2 in panel (c) is not defined; the text should specify whether it is the full mean-field dp/dε from Eqs. (46) and (64) or the free Fermi gas expression (23).
  2. [Abstract and Sec. II.A] The phrase 'hydrodynamic stability (ζ > 0)' is imprecise; positivity of the bulk viscosity is only one of several conditions required for linear stability of relativistic hydrodynamics.
  3. [Eq. (63) and Fig. 5] The rational fit for τrel has a denominator that may vanish on the displayed x interval; the text should state the domain of validity of the fit and explain how the apparent pole is handled.
  4. [Sec. IV] The statement that the bulk viscosity is approximately twice the shear viscosity should specify the density interval over which this holds and the caveat that the behavior is nonmonotonic and changes sign outside the physical region, as shown in Fig. 6(b).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transport relations are derived from the Boltzmann equation, the relaxation time is computed from scattering amplitudes rather than fitted to viscosities, and the stability inequality (33) is a derived consequence, not an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Equations (19)-(21) solve the linearized Boltzmann equation under the relaxation time approximation, and the relaxation time in Sec. II C is computed from the 2-to-2 collision kernel and MC phase-space integrals, not adjusted to reproduce eta or zeta. Equations (32) are algebraic consequences of the generic quasiparticle ansatz (7), the gap equations (26), and the chain rule (28)-(31). The stability constraint (33) is obtained by imposing zeta > 0 on the derived expression (32b), so it is a derived inequality rather than a fitted input or a self-imported uniqueness condition. The only noticeable self-citation is Ref. [65] for the standard free-fermion thermodynamic functions (22); those formulas are textbook results and are not load-bearing for the paper's main claim. The main caveat is not circularity but a possible approximation: Eq. (24) inserts the free-fermion v_s^2 of Eq. (23) into the general phi_2 of Eq. (19b), whereas the thermodynamic v_s^2 = dp/d epsilon of the full mean-field EOS (46)+(64) is not shown to equal that free-gas value. This affects the validity of Eq. (33) but does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on RTA, neglect of pairing and antiparticles, and the free-gas sound-speed substitution. The Walecka application adds four mean-field couplings fitted to nuclear matter and a rational-function fit to the Monte Carlo relaxation time.

free parameters (6)
  • Walecka coupling g_sigma^2/(4 pi) = 6.003
    Fitted to nuclear matter saturation properties in Ref. [67]; used in gap equations and the relaxation time calculation.
  • Walecka coupling g_omega^2/(4 pi) = 5.948
    Fitted to nuclear matter saturation properties in Ref. [67]; used in gap equations and the relaxation time calculation.
  • Walecka potential coefficient b = 7.950e-3
    Fitted to nuclear matter saturation properties; enters U(sigma) and the gap equations.
  • Walecka potential coefficient c = 6.952e-4
    Fitted to nuclear matter saturation properties; enters U(sigma) and the gap equations.
  • Relaxation time fit coefficients in Eq. (63) = Numerator: 1966.8, -2.37, 5.44, -5.63, 1.90; denominator: 1, 2.25, -3.60
    Rational function fitted to Monte Carlo evaluation of the collision integral; used to produce Figures 5 and 6 and the reported viscosities.
  • Temperature T for numerical demonstration = 8 MeV
    Chosen by hand to stay in the T/mu* << 1 regime while avoiding thermal excitation; affects the relaxation time scale and the numerical results.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Relaxation time approximation C[f] = -delta f / tau_rel
    Sec. II.A after Eq. (10); the collision term is replaced by a single relaxation scale, which the authors themselves note may make the bulk-viscosity sign constraint an artifact.
  • domain assumption Antiparticles neglected for mu/T >> 1
    Footnote 2 in Sec. II.A; reasonable at cold densities but excludes pair contributions.
  • domain assumption No nucleon pairing; normal Fermi liquid state
    Sec. I states that the temperature is not so low as to induce significant pairing; real cold dense baryon matter is likely paired, which changes transport.
  • domain assumption Isospin symmetric nuclear matter with m_n = m_p
    Sec. III.A; protons and neutrons are treated as degenerate, so neutron-rich matter is outside the application.
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation with condensates and no meson fluctuations in the thermodynamics
    Sec. III.A; the gap equations (48) and pressure (46) omit vacuum and medium corrections to meson masses.
  • domain assumption Tree-level t and u channel scattering only for the relaxation time
    Sec. III.B and Fig. 4; s-channel and meson fluctuations beyond quadratic terms are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The speed of sound in Eq. (19b) is replaced by the free Fermi gas expression Eq. (23)
    Sec. II.B between Eqs. (23) and (24); this substitution is not derived and is load-bearing for the bulk viscosity formula and sign constraint.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic stability of the mean field is defined by positive-definite Hessian of Veff, Eqs. (27)
    Sec. II.B; for the vector condensate this criterion may be too restrictive, and the paper's Walecka application never satisfies it, making the 'physical region' definition ambiguous.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transport coefficients of dense nucleon matter at low temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PWVG33ZA

@misc{pith2026241220454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transport coefficients of dense nucleon matter at low temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PWVG33ZA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20454}
}
abstract

The transport property of cold and dense nucleon matter is important for nuclear physics but is relatively less studied than that at finite temperatures. In this paper, we present a primary study of bulk and shear viscosities in the limit $T/\mu_B \ll 1$, where $T$ and $\mu_B$ are the temperature and the baryon chemical potential. The analysis is performed for a generic system where nucleons are dressed by the condensation of both scalar and vector interactions. Under the relaxation time approximation of the Boltzmann equation, we compute the viscosities of the system to leading power in $T/\mu_B$ expansion and establish a relation between the thermodynamic potential and transport coefficients, including bulk viscosity ($\zeta$) and shear viscosity ($\eta$). It is found that hydrodynamic stability ($\zeta>0$) imposes additional constraints on the thermodynamic potential. As an example, these relations are applied to the Walecka model. The fluid properties of the cold and dense nucleon matter are characterized by the dimensionless combination of viscosities times the quasi-Fermi momentum over the enthalpy. Furthermore, we discuss the implication of the stability condition on the range of applicability of the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20454 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic representation of Fermi liquid at zero temper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A sketch of the Sommerfeld expansion at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Static properties of nucleon matter depicted by the Walecka [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Feynman diagrams of leading-order nucleon-nucleon scat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The dimensionless scaled (a) shear viscosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fermi-liquid view of viscosity in cold and dense nucleon matter

    nucl-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a quasiparticle Fermi liquid with medium-dependent mass, imposing Landau matching makes the bulk viscosity manifestly non-negative and parametrically smaller than shear viscosity at low temperature, ζ/η ∝ (T/μ*)⁴.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Accardi et al., Electron ion collider: The next QCD frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur

    A. Accardi et al., Electron ion collider: The next QCD frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 268 (2016), arXiv:1212.1701 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    D. P. Anderle et al., Electron-ion collider in China, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64701 (2021), arXiv:2102.09222 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    ∂q1 ∂m∗ + 1 f′ ( ¯σ) ∂q1 ∂ ¯σ # dm∗ dµ + ∂q1 ∂µ∗ dµ∗ dµ = 0, (29a) ∂q2 ∂m∗ dm∗ dµ +

    With this, we have ϕ2 = τrel 3E∗p δ (µ∗− p· u) µ∗2− m∗2 m∗ µ∗ dm∗ dµ∗ . (24) From this, we can notice that the sign of ζ is determined by dm∗/dµ∗. In the MFA, the e ffective potential ¯Veff can gener- ally be expressed as ¯Veff (µ; ¯σ, ¯ω0) =−p (µ; ¯σ, ¯ω0) =− X i p0 m∗ i ( ¯σ),µ∗ i ( ¯ω) + U ( ¯σ, ¯ω0) , (25) where the subscript i sums over all particle ...

    1966

  4. [4]

    Central and tensor components of three-nucleon forces in low-energy proton-deuteron scattering

    S. Ishikawa, M. Tanifuji, and Y . Iseri, Central and ten- sor components of three nucleon forces in low-energy pro- ton deuteron scattering, Phys. Rev. C 67, 061001 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0304070

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Pang, Y .-L

    D.-Y . Pang, Y .-L. Ye, and F.-R. Xu, Energy-dependent opti- cal model potentials for α and deuteron with 12c, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 39, 095101 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    C. Yuan, C. Qi, and F. Xu, Shell evolution in neutron-rich car- bon isotopes: Unexpected enhanced role of neutron-neutron correlation, Nucl. Phys. A 883, 25 (2012), arXiv:1209.5583 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Y . Shi, J. Dobaczewski, S. Frauendorf, W. Nazarewicz, J. C. Pei, F. R. Xu, and N. Nikolov, Self-consistent tilted- axis-cranking study of triaxial strongly deformed bands in 158Er at ultrahigh spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 092501 (2012), arXiv:1112.1345 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Andronic et al., Hadron Production in Ultra-relativistic Nu- clear Collisions: Quarkyonic Matter and a Triple Point in the Phase Diagram of QCD, Nucl

    A. Andronic et al., Hadron Production in Ultra-relativistic Nu- clear Collisions: Quarkyonic Matter and a Triple Point in the Phase Diagram of QCD, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 65 (2010), arXiv:0911.4806 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Muller, J

    B. Muller, J. Schukraft, and B. Wyslouch, First Results from Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 361 (2012), arXiv:1202.3233 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Shuryak, Strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma in heavy ion collisions, Rev

    E. Shuryak, Strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma in heavy ion collisions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035001 (2017), arXiv:1412.8393 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Anisotropic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 132302 (2016), arXiv:1602.01119 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bzdak, S

    A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V . Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan, Phys. Rept. 853, 1 (2020), arXiv:1906.00936 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. J. Ethier and E. R. Nocera, Parton Distributions in Nucle- 14 ons and Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 43 (2020), arXiv:2001.07722 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Abdul Khalek et al

    R. Abdul Khalek et al. , Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Re- port, Nucl. Phys. A 1026, 122447 (2022), arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Shen and B

    C. Shen and B. Schenke, Longitudinal dynamics and particle production in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064905 (2022), arXiv:2203.04685 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    W. Zhao, C. Shen, and B. Schenke, Collectivity in Ultraperiph- eral Pb+Pb Collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 252302 (2022), arXiv:2203.06094 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Collectivity in Ultra- peripheral Heavy-ion and e + A Collisions, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 18, 1 (2025), arXiv:2411.18407 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Abir et al., The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, (2023), arXiv:2305.14572 [hep-ph]

    R. Abir et al., The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, (2023), arXiv:2305.14572 [hep-ph]

    2023

  12. [20]

    U. W. Heinz, Concepts of heavy ion physics, in 2nd CERN- CLAF School of High Energy Physics (2004) pp. 165–238, arXiv:hep-ph/0407360

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Pasechnik and M

    R. Pasechnik and M. ˇSumbera, Phenomenological Review on Quark–Gluon Plasma: Concepts vs. Observations, Universe 3, 7 (2017), arXiv:1611.01533 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    G. F. Burgio and I. Vidana, The Equation of State of Nuclear Matter : from Finite Nuclei to Neutron Stars, Universe 6, 119 (2020), arXiv:2007.04427 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Deng, D.-Q

    X.-G. Deng, D.-Q. Fang, and Y .-G. Ma, Shear viscosity of nu- cleonic matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136, 104095 (2024), arXiv:2401.02293 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. V . Delacretaz, Y .-H. Du, U. Mehta, and D. T. Son, Nonlin- ear bosonization of Fermi surfaces: The method of coadjoint orbits, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033131 (2022), arXiv:2203.05004 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    L. D. Landau, The Theory of a Fermi Liquid, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 1058 (1956)

    1956

  18. [26]

    C. Y . Tsang, M. B. Tsang, W. G. Lynch, R. Kumar, and C. J. Horowitz, Determination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations, Nature Astron. 8, 328 (2024), arXiv:2310.11588 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, J. N¨attil¨a, and A. Vuorinen, Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars, Nature Commun. 14, 8451 (2023), arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. Astrophys. 380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    K. A. Van Riper, Neutron star thermal evolution, Astrophysi- cal Journal Supplement Series (ISSN 0067-0049), vol. 75, Feb. 1991, p. 449-462. DOE-supported research. 75, 449 (1991)

    1991

  22. [30]

    D. G. Yakovlev and C. J. Pethick, Neutron star cooling, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 42, 169 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0402143

    2004

  23. [31]

    D. Page, U. Geppert, and F. Weber, The Cooling of compact stars, Nucl. Phys. A 777, 497 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508056

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    P. A. Evans et al. , Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: detection of a blue kilonova, Science 358, 1565 (2017), arXiv:1710.05437 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Multi-messenger Observations of a Bi- nary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    E. A. Paschos, Electroweak Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    Schmitt and P

    A. Schmitt and P. Shternin, Reaction rates and transport in neutron stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 457, 455 (2018), arXiv:1711.06520 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Hoyos, N

    C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, and A. Vuorinen, Holographic approach to compact stars and their binary mergers, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 126, 103972 (2022), arXiv:2112.08422 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hoyos, M

    C. Hoyos, M. J ¨arvinen, N. Jokela, J. G. Subils, J. Tarr ´ıo, and A. Vuorinen, Transport in strongly coupled quark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241601 (2020), arXiv:2005.14205 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cruz Rojas, T

    J. Cruz Rojas, T. Gorda, C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, M. J ¨arvinen, A. Kurkela, R. Paatelainen, S. S ¨appi, and A. Vuorinen, Esti- mate for the Bulk Viscosity of Strongly Coupled Quark Matter Using Perturbative QCD and Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 071901 (2024), arXiv:2402.00621 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. P. Harris, Bulk viscosity in dense nuclear matter, in Bulk Properties of Dense Hadronic Matter , edited by M. Buballa, S. Plumari, I. Bombaci, and D. P. Menezes (CRC Press, 2023) pp. 153–174, arXiv:2407.16157 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Goldreich and A

    P. Goldreich and A. Reisenegger, Magnetic field decay in iso- lated neutron stars, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004- 637X), vol. 395, no. 1, p. 250-258. 395, 250 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    A. P. Igoshev, S. B. Popov, and R. Hollerbach, Evolution of Neutron Star Magnetic Fields, Universe 7, 351 (2021), arXiv:2109.05584 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Lindblom, B

    L. Lindblom, B. J. Owen, and S. M. Morsink, Gravitational ra- diation instability in hot young neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4843 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9803053

    1998 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Lindblom and B

    L. Lindblom and B. J. Owen, E ffect of hyperon bulk viscos- ity on neutron star r modes, Phys. Rev. D 65, 063006 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0110558

    2002 arXiv

  36. [44]

    L. V . Delacr ´etaz, S. D. Chowdhury, and U. Mehta, Sym- metry and causality constraints on Fermi liquids, (2025), arXiv:2501.02073 [hep-th]

    2025

  37. [45]

    Aarts, Complex Langevin dynamics and other approaches at finite chemical potential, PoS LATTICE2012, 017 (2012), arXiv:1302.3028 [hep-lat]

    G. Aarts, Complex Langevin dynamics and other approaches at finite chemical potential, PoS LATTICE2012, 017 (2012), arXiv:1302.3028 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    J. D. Walecka, A Theory of highly condensed matter, Annals Phys. 83, 491 (1974)

    1974

  39. [47]

    L. P. Csernai and J. I. Kapusta, Entropy and Cluster Production in Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rept. 131, 223 (1986)

    1986

  40. [48]

    Herbert, K

    T. Herbert, K. Wehrberger, and F. Beck, The Pion propagator in the Walecka model with the delta baryon, Nucl. Phys. A 541, 699 (1992)

    1992

  41. [49]

    Das Gupta, A

    S. Das Gupta, A. Z. Mekjian, and M. B. Tsang, Liquid- gas phase transition in nuclear multifragmentation, Avd. Nucl. Phys. 26, 89 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0009033

    2001 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. R. De Groot, Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Ap- plications, edited by W. A. Van Leeuwen and C. G. Van Weert (1980)

    1980

  43. [51]

    Pines, Theory Of Quantum Liquids: Normal Fermi Liquids , 1st ed

    D. Pines, Theory Of Quantum Liquids: Normal Fermi Liquids , 1st ed. (CRC Press, 1989)

    1989

  44. [52]

    Nozieres, Theory of interacting Fermi systems, 1st ed

    P. Nozieres, Theory of interacting Fermi systems, 1st ed. (CRC Press, 1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid He-3, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 48, 357–357 (1976)]

    1975

  46. [54]

    Baym and S

    G. Baym and S. A. Chin, Landau Theory of Relativistic Fermi Liquids, Nucl. Phys. A 262, 527 (1976)

    1976

  47. [55]

    S. P. Klevansky, The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992)

    1992

  48. [56]

    Schwenk and J

    A. Schwenk and J. Polonyi, Towards density functional calcu- lations from nuclear forces, in 32nd International Workshop on Gross Properties of Nuclei and Nuclear Excitation: Probing Nuclei and Nucleons with Electrons and Photons (Hirschegg

  49. [57]

    Baldo and G

    M. Baldo and G. F. Burgio, Properties of the nuclear medium, Rept. Prog. Phys. 75, 026301 (2012), arXiv:1102.1364 [nucl- th]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Epelbaum, H.-W

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Modern 15 Theory of Nuclear Forces, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009), arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. W. Holt, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Chiral Fermi liquid ap- proach to neutron matter, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014338 (2013), arXiv:1209.5296 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Friman, K

    B. Friman, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Renormalization group and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 245 (2012), arXiv:1201.2510 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    R ¨opke, D

    G. R ¨opke, D. N. V oskresensky, I. A. Kryukov, and D. Blaschke, Fermi liquid, clustering, and structure factor in dilute warm nu- clear matter, Nucl. Phys. A 970, 224 (2018), arXiv:1710.08251 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. W. Holt, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Nuclear chiral dynam- ics and thermodynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 73, 35 (2013), arXiv:1304.6350 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Friman and W

    B. Friman and W. Weise, Neutron Star Matter as a Rel- ativistic Fermi Liquid, Phys. Rev. C 100, 065807 (2019), arXiv:1908.09722 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. W. Holt, N. Kaiser, and T. R. Whitehead, Tensor Fermi liquid parameters in nuclear matter from chiral e ffective field theory, Phys. Rev. C 97, 054325 (2018), arXiv:1712.05013 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J. Li, T. Guo, J. Zhao, and L. He, Do we need dense matter equation of state in curved spacetime for neutron stars?, Phys. Rev. D 106, 083021 (2022), arXiv:2206.02106 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Drischler, J

    C. Drischler, J. W. Holt, and C. Wellenhofer, Chiral E ffective Field Theory and the High-Density Nuclear Equation of State, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 403 (2021), arXiv:2101.01709 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  59. [67]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-temperature field theory: Prin- ciples and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemat- ical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    Sommerfeld, Zur elektronentheorie der metalle auf grund der fermischen statistik: i

    A. Sommerfeld, Zur elektronentheorie der metalle auf grund der fermischen statistik: i. teil: allgemeines, str ¨omungs-und austrittsvorg¨ange, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik 47, 1 (1928)

    1928

  61. [69]

    Shu and J.-R

    S. Shu and J.-R. Li, The CJT calculation in studying nuclear matter beyond mean field approximation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 1769 (2008), arXiv:nucl-th/0702058

    2008 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Shu and J.-R

    S. Shu and J.-R. Li, Thermodynamical consistent CJT calcula- tion in studying nuclear matter, Nucl. Phys. A 760, 369 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0503056

    2005 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Chen and T.-Y

    T. Chen and T.-Y . Li, Homotopy continuation method for solv- ing systems of nonlinear and polynomial equations, Commun. Inform. Syst. 15, 119 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    L. D. Miller and A. E. S. Green, Relativistic Self-Consistent Meson Field Theory of Spherical Nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 5, 241 (1972)

    1972

  66. [74]

    K. L. Wang, S. X. Qin, Y . X. Liu, L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Existence and stability of multiple solu- tions to the gap equation, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114001 (2012), arXiv:1209.2757 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    G. P. Lepage, Adaptive multidimensional integration: VE- GAS enhanced, J. Comput. Phys. 439, 110386 (2021), arXiv:2009.05112 [physics.comp-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    K. S. Krane, Introductory nuclear physics (John Wiley & Sons, 1991)

    1991

  69. [77]

    L. Du, A. Sorensen, and M. Stephanov, The QCD phase dia- gram and Beam Energy Scan physics: a theory overview, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430008 (2024), arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Liao and V

    J. Liao and V . Koch, On the Fluidity and Super-Criticality of the QCD matter at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C 81, 014902 (2010), arXiv:0909.3105 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Da ¸browski and P

    J. Da ¸browski and P. Haensel, The deformation of the fermi sur- face in polarized nuclear matter, Annals of Physics 97, 452 (1976)

    1976

  72. [80]

    Bertsch, The collision integral in nuclear matter at zero tem- perature, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik A Atoms and Nuclei 289, 103 (1978)

    G. Bertsch, The collision integral in nuclear matter at zero tem- perature, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik A Atoms and Nuclei 289, 103 (1978)

    1978

  73. [81]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Nucleon - nucleon scattering from e ffective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 478, 629 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9605002

    1996 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Frick, H

    T. Frick, H. Muther, and A. Sedrakian, Interaction induced deformation in momentum distribution of spin polarized nu- clear matter, Phys. Rev. C 65, 061303 (2002), arXiv:nucl- th/0203048

    2002

  75. [83]

    G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Novel Relaxation Time Approximation to the Relativistic Boltzmann Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 042301 (2021), arXiv:2103.07489 [nucl- th]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    P. Wen, J. W. Holt, and M. Li, Generative Modeling of Nucleon- Nucleon Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 252501 (2024), arXiv:2306.13007 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Ke and Y

    W. Ke and Y . Yin, Does a Quark-Gluon Plasma Feature an Ex- tended Hydrodynamic Regime?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 212303 (2023), arXiv:2208.01046 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Hu, Relaxation time approximation revisited and pole /cut structure in retarded correlators, (2024), arXiv:2409.05131 [hep-ph]

    J. Hu, Relaxation time approximation revisited and pole /cut structure in retarded correlators, (2024), arXiv:2409.05131 [hep-ph]

    2024

  79. [87]

    Ke and Y

    W. Ke and Y . Yin, Non-hydrodynamic response in QCD-like plasma, JHEP 05, 171, arXiv:2312.08062 [nucl-th]

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Brewer, W

    J. Brewer, W. Ke, L. Yan, and Y . Yin, Far-from-equilibrium slow modes and momentum anisotropy in an expanding plasma, Phys. Rev. D 109, L091504 (2024), arXiv:2212.00820 [nucl- th]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Floerchinger, G

    S. Floerchinger, G. Giacalone, L. H. Heyen, and L. Tharwat, Qualifying collective behavior in expanding ultracold gases as a function of particle number, Phys. Rev. C105, 044908 (2022), arXiv:2111.13591 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Universality Classes of Relativistic Fluid Dynamics: Foundations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 222302 (2024), arXiv:2302.03478 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991)

    1991

  84. [92]

    Brandstetter et al

    S. Brandstetter et al. , Emergent interaction-driven elliptic flow of few fermionic atoms, Nature Phys. 21, 52 (2025), arXiv:2308.09699 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V . Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun.256, 107478 (2020), arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V . Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016), arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  87. [2004]

    (2004) arXiv:nucl-th/0403011

    2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.