Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

A structure-preserving collisional particle method for the Landau kinetic equation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A stochastic particle method for the Landau equation uses the spherical-Brownian-motion structure of paired collisions to make its time discretization exact, preserving conservation laws and entropy dissipation at O(N) per step.

desk verdict A genuinely new exact time discretization for a paired particle system, but the jump from particle system to Landau equation is still a belief, not a theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00263 v1 pith:YTYAXVEI submitted 2024-12-31 math.NA cs.NAphysics.comp-ph

Kai Du , Lei Li , Yongle Xie , Yang Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NAphysics.comp-ph MSC 65M7582C4082D1065C30
keywords LandauequationcollisionalparticlemethodsphericalBrownianmotionexacttimediscretizationstructurepreservationentropydissipationVlasov–Poisson–LandauCoulombcollision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a stochastic particle method for the Landau equation, the kinetic model of grazing collisions in a plasma. Its central claim is that the relative velocity of each colliding pair evolves as a spherical Brownian motion, and that a scheme which samples that motion exactly reproduces the continuous-time collisional particle system at every discrete time point. The paper argues that this exact temporal discretization preserves mass, momentum, and energy, and dissipates entropy, while costing only $O(N)$ per step. If correct, the method gives long-time stable simulations of collisional plasmas, including the Coulomb case, without the energy blow-up that a naive Euler–Maruyama discretization exhibits.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spherical Brownian motion representation of a collision pair. Because $\sigma(z)z=0$, the relative velocity $Z_i$ has constant magnitude within each window and satisfies a Stratonovich SDE equivalent to a standard spherical Brownian motion on the sphere of radius $|Z_i|$, with time scaled by $k=4\Lambda|Z_i|^{\gamma}$. Algorithm 1 replaces time integration of the pair by an exact SBM sample over $k\Delta t$, which is the step that removes temporal discretization error and carries every structure-preservation property in the paper.

What would settle it

The two layers can be tested separately. For exactness, compare Algorithm 1 with a finely resolved simulation of the continuous-time paired SDE on the same grid: any distributional difference beyond SBM sampling error would refute exactness. For Landau fidelity, run the scheme with very large $N$ on a case with a known solution, such as the BKW solution for Maxwell molecules, and check whether the mollified empirical density converges to it as $N$ grows; a persistent $O(1)$ discrepancy would falsify the connection to the Landau equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Algorithm 1, the spherical Brownian motion (SBM) scheme, is claimed to be an exact time discretization of the paired collision system: at every grid point the particle distribution matches the continuous-time system's distribution, so no temporal discretization error is introduced. The mechanism is that the relative velocity $Z_i = V_i - V_{\theta(i)}$ obeys the Stratonovich equation $dZ_i = 2\sigma(Z_i) \circ dW_i$ with $\sigma(z)=\sqrt{\Lambda}|z|^{\gamma/2+1}(I_d - z\otimes z/|z|^2)$, and this equation is solved by a time-rescaled spherical Brownian motion, so $|Z_i|$ stays constant within a collision window. Sampling that rescaling with exact spherical Brownian motion algorithms lets each step update velocities without numerical time integration, while preserving momentum and energy pathwise and dissipating entropy. The same collision update is embedded in an energy-conserving particle-in-cell splitting for the Vlasov–Poisson–Landau equation, and the paper shows numerically that Euler–Maruyama instead inflates energy at a rate proportional to $\sum_i |z_i|^{2\gamma+2}\Delta t^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme exactly simulates a continuous-time particle system, but the paper's convergence proof for that system covers only the independent-Brownian case; the paired-Brownian version is asserted to converge to the Landau equation, and if that assertion fails the method is exact for the wrong equation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long-time simulations will not accumulate energy error, so temperature and entropy evolution stay reliable far beyond the time horizon accessible to Euler–Maruyama.
  • The numerical error separates into particle-sampling error and SBM simulation error; at fixed time step the mollified density converges roughly like $N^{-1/2}$ as the particle number grows.
  • The $O(N)$ per-step cost and pair-wise structure make the method scalable and naturally parallelizable over pairs.
  • The exact collision update composes with an energy-conserving particle-in-cell scheme, preserving total energy for the Vlasov–Poisson–Landau system rather than only kinetic energy.
  • For singular kernels such as the Coulomb case, the scheme avoids both the energy blow-up of Euler–Maruyama and the need for a small-velocity cutoff, because the relative-speed magnitude is frozen inside each collision window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exactness is with respect to the paired-particle system; the scheme's fidelity to the Landau equation itself rests on the unproved conjecture that the paired Brownian coupling has the same mean-field limit as the independent-Brownian system. If that conjecture fails, the method exactly simulates a process that is not Landau.
  • Because the exactness proof uses only the spherical structure of the relative velocity, the same sampling idea should extend to collision kernels that preserve that spherical structure; a direct test would be to run the scheme on an anisotropic kernel and check whether momentum, energy, and entropy remain exact.
  • The paper's entropy diagnostics use a mollified empirical measure as a proxy for the joint $N$-particle entropy; a sharper check would estimate the joint-law entropy or a many-particle Wasserstein distance, separating genuine dissipation from particle-noise effects.
  • The pairing step is formally a random batch of size two, but the mechanism is not a generic random-batch approximation of the mean-field SDE; this suggests the statistical error may scale differently with $N$, which could be probed by comparing against batch sizes larger than two at matched cost.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a stochastic particle method for the Landau collision operator. The method is based on a collisional particle system (CP) in which particles are randomly paired over time windows and each pair evolves with opposite Brownian motions; the relative velocity is a spherical Brownian motion. The main algorithmic contribution, Algorithm 1, uses Stroock's representation to sample the relative velocity exactly at discrete times, making the discrete-time distribution of the particle system equal to the continuous-time CP distribution. The paper proves pathwise conservation of momentum and energy (Proposition 2.1), gives a formal entropy-dissipation identity (Proposition 2.2), shows that the Euler-Maruyama discretization inflates energy (Proposition 3.1), reports O(N) complexity, and extends the method to the Vlasov-Poisson-Landau equation through an energy-conserving PIC scheme. Numerical experiments include 2D and 3D BKW solutions, a 2D Coulomb case, and Landau damping.

Significance. The SBM mechanism is genuinely attractive: the exact-in-time property for CP is derived from the geometry of the problem rather than from a fitted parameter, the conservation proofs in Section 2 are clean, and the cost per step is linear. If the convergence of CP to the Landau equation under the anti-correlated coupling is established, this would be a valuable structure-preserving particle method for collisional plasmas. At present, however, the link between CP and the Landau equation is the weakest point: the paper's convergence argument is heuristic, and the rigorous result in [14] is for independent Brownian motions, not the paired coupling used here. The numerical experiments are promising but do not by themselves close this gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, CP system; Section 3, Algorithm 1] The exactness claim for Algorithm 1 is with respect to the CP process defined in (2.1) with W_i = -W_theta(i). The justification that CP approximates the Landau equation is only heuristic, introduced by 'To intuitively explain...' in Section 2, and the authors write 'We believe that under both settings, the particle system converges to the same limit equation. Establishing this convergence under more general conditions will be a focus of our future work.' The convergence theorem in the authors' prior work [14] is for system (1.4) with independent Brownian motions. The anti-correlated coupling freezes pair centers of mass and changes two-particle correlations, so the relative-entropy argument in [14] does not transfer automatically. This is load-bearing: an exact scheme for a process not known to converge to Landau may be exactly simulating a different kinetic equation. I ask for either a proof of mean-field convergence for the paired coupling or a quantitative numerical demonstration that the bias is negligible, for example by showing convergence of the empirical measure to an independent high-accuracy Landau solution as N tends to infinity with the mollifier error controlled separately.
  2. [Section 5, Figures 2(a) and 4(a)] The reported N^{-1/2} rates measure the total mollified L2 error against a reference and do not separate the 1/sqrt(N) sampling noise from a possible systematic bias of the CP model. In the Coulomb test in Section 5.2, the reference is itself a random-batch particle method; if the same mean-field-limit issue affects that method, the comparison cannot validate the limit. The paper should provide bias diagnostics, for instance by fixing a very accurate spectral or deterministic reference, varying N at fixed mollification width, and reporting multiple independent runs with error bars. Without such a separation, the observed agreement with BKW or the reference solution could be a coincidence of two approximations rather than evidence that CP converges to the Landau equation.
  3. [Section 2, Proposition 2.2 and Remark 2.1] Entropy dissipation is derived formally from the Liouville equation (2.4) under an unverified regularity assumption, and Remark 2.1 explicitly defers well-posedness. In addition, the numerical quantity in Section 5 is H(f^N_epsilon), the entropy of a mollified one-particle marginal, which is related to H_N(f^N) only under an approximate i.i.d. chaos assumption that is exactly what remains unproved for the paired system. The paper should state more prominently that Proposition 2.2 is a formal statement and that the numerical entropy plots are illustrative rather than a verification of the proposition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, after (4.6)] The definition v^{n+1/2}_i := 1/2(v^n_i + x^{n+1}_i) appears to contain a typo; the second term should presumably be v^{n+1}_i.
  2. [Section 3, Algorithm 1] The statement that the discretization introduces no additional errors is conditional on exact simulation of the spherical Brownian motion. For d >= 3 the paper says the Wright-Fisher diffusion can be exactly simulated or well-approximated when the time step is small; please state clearly for which experiments the SBM sampling is exact and for which it is approximate, and quantify the approximation error.
  3. [Section 4, Algorithm 3] The handling of cells with an odd number of particles is described only heuristically: 'with probability 1/2, the extra one collides with a randomly selected one in the post-collision particles.' As written, this may break the pair-symmetry structure and the conservation proof; please clarify the procedure and its effect on the conservation properties.
  4. [Section 5.4, Figure 6] The y-axis of Figure 6(c) shows raw total-energy values without a clear legend, and the caption says curves for Lambda = 0 and Lambda = 1 are stacked; a legend and explicit labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the SBM scheme's exactness and invariants are proved from the CP SDE; the unproved mean-field limit of the paired system is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Algorithm 1 is constructed from the CP dynamics (2.1); the exactness claim is a direct consequence of the identity dZ_i = 2σ(Z_i)∘dW_i and Stroock's representation of spherical Brownian motion, not of the Landau equation. Proposition 2.1 and 2.2 prove momentum/energy conservation and entropy dissipation within the same system by explicit calculus (d|Z_i|^2=0 and the Liouville form (2.4)). The BKW and Coulomb reference comparisons are external benchmarks with no fitted parameters. The one weakness is that the CP-to-Landau limit is asserted heuristically: the paper cites [14] for a convergence theorem, but immediately notes that [14] used independent Brownian motions rather than the paired W_i=-W_θ(i) used here, and states "We believe that under both settings, the particle system converges to the same limit equation. Establishing this convergence under more general conditions will be a focus of our future work." This is a missing proof/assumption, not a reduction of the scheme's output to its inputs. The exact discretization and conservation laws do not depend on that limit being Landau; they are properties of the CP system itself. Therefore no fitted input is renamed as a prediction and no self-citation chain forces the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger captures the unproven convergence of the exact scheme's underlying particle system as its main assumption; no new physical entities are introduced, and the only user-chosen parameters are the collision window and the post-processing mollifier width.

free parameters (2)
  • Collision time window Delta t = 0.1 (homogeneous cases), 0.02 (Vlasov-Poisson-Landau)
    Duration between random re-pairings. The exact SBM update eliminates temporal discretization error within the window, but the model's approximation to the Landau equation still depends on this user-chosen window size.
  • Gaussian mollifier width epsilon = 0.01
    Post-processing smoothing width used to estimate densities, L2 errors, and entropy from particle samples. Fixed across experiments; reported error and entropy values depend on this choice.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The paired-Brownian collisional particle system (CP) converges in the mean-field limit to the Landau equation.
    Section 2 gives only an intuitive explanation and states convergence 'will be a focus of our future work'; the cited rigorous result [14] uses independent Brownian motions, not W_i=-W_theta(i).
  • domain assumption The joint density f^N is smooth enough for the Liouville equation (2.4) and the entropy dissipation calculation.
    Proposition 2.2 assumes f^N is properly regular; Remark 2.1 defers well-posedness to standard PDE theory and future work.
  • domain assumption Particle chaos or approximate independence holds at the start of each collision window.
    The heuristic Landau-limit derivation in Section 2 and the entropy approximation H_N(f^N) approximately equal to H(f_epsilon^N) in Section 5 assume particles are approximately i.i.d.
  • standard math Spherical Brownian motion on S^{d-1} can be sampled exactly or accurately enough by the cited algorithms [21,25].
    Algorithm 1 relies on SBM sampling; correctness of the discrete-time exactness claim depends on these external samplers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A structure-preserving collisional particle method for the Landau kinetic equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YTYAXVEI

@misc{pith2026250100263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A structure-preserving collisional particle method for the Landau kinetic equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YTYAXVEI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00263}
}
abstract

In this paper, we propose and implement a structure-preserving stochastic particle method for the Landau equation. The method is based on a particle system for the Landau equation, where pairwise grazing collisions are modeled as diffusion processes. By exploiting the unique structure of the particle system and a spherical Brownian motion sampling, the method avoids additional temporal discretization of the particle system, ensuring that the discrete-time particle distributions exactly match their continuous-time counterparts. The method achieves $O(N)$ complexity per time step and preserves fundamental physical properties, including the conservation of mass, momentum and energy, as well as entropy dissipation. It demonstrates strong long-time accuracy and stability in numerical experiments. Furthermore, we also apply the method to the spatially non-homogeneous equations through a case study of the Vlasov--Poisson--Landau equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00263 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time evolution of relative L2 error, energy and entropy for different N, where (a)(b) shows the results of both SBM and EM schemes and (c) show the results of SBM scheme. 10000 40000 70000 100000 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 (a) Order of accuracy at t = 5 10000 40000 70000 100000 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 (b) CPU time per time step (in seconds) with re￾spect to particle number N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Convergence rate (left) and CPU time (right) of SBM scheme [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time evolution of relative L2 error, energy for different N , where (a)(b) shows the results of both SBM and EM schemes. and the initial condition is chosen as f(0, v) = 1 4π h 0.4 exp  − (v − u1) 2 2  + 1.6 exp  − (v − u2) 2 2 i, u1 = (−2, 1), u2 = (1, −1). For this problem, we do not have analytical solution. Here, we use the Type 1 Random Batch Method (Algorithm 3 in [9]) with ∆t = 0.2, n0 = 200 (particle num… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Convergence order (left) and CPU time (right) of SBM scheme [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time evolution of relative L2 error and energy for different N. Algorithm 4 Solve electric field in grid centers Require: Number of particles N, particle positions xi (i = 1, · · · , N), particle charge q, number of spatial grids n0, and grid size ∆x. 1: Compute the ch…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a,b) Electric field L2 norm using SBM scheme for α = 0.1, 0.5; (c) Total energy using the SBM scheme. Note that the curves for Λ = 0 and Λ = 1 stacked together. 6 Conclusion In this work, we introduced a stochastic particle method for the Landau kinetic equation that …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Kac's Program for the Landau Equation

    math.AP 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The k-particle velocity marginals of Kac's particle system converge to the factorized law of the Landau solution for all power-law potentials, including Coulomb collisions, in weak, Wasserstein, entropic, and strong L...

  2. Numerical analysis of the homogeneous Landau equation: approximation, error estimates and simulation

    math.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Fourier spectral scheme for the Landau-Coulomb equation is proven to converge with explicit error bounds: larger truncated domains and more Fourier modes push the error below any prescribed tolerance on any fixed ti...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [14]

    A collision-oriented interacting particle system for Landau-type equa- tions and the molecular chaos

    Kai Du and Lei Li. A collision-oriented interacting particle system for Landau-type equa- tions and the molecular chaos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16252 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    The Collisional Particle-In-Cell Method for the Vlasov-Maxwell-Landau Equations

    Rafael Bailo, Jos´ e A Carrillo, and Jingwei Hu. The collisional particle-in-cell method for the Vlasov-Maxwell-Landau equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01689 , 2024. 18

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Molecular gas dynamics

    Graeme Austin Bird. Molecular gas dynamics. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A , 76:40225, 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [3]

    Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, PIC-MCC

    Charles K Birdsall. Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, PIC-MCC. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , 19(2):65–85, 1991

    work page 1991

  5. [4]

    A. V. Bobylev. Landau equation, Boltzmann-type equations, discrete models, and numerical methods. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    A. V. Bobylev and K. Nanbu. Theory of collision algorithms for gases and plasmas based on the Boltzmann equation and the Landau–Fokker–Planck equation. Physical Review E , 61(4):4576, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [6]

    Comparison of numerical schemes for Fokker–Planck–Landau equation

    Christophe Buet, St´ ephane Cordier, and Francis Filbet. Comparison of numerical schemes for Fokker–Planck–Landau equation. In ESAIM: Proceedings, volume 10, pages 161–181. EDP Sciences, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [7]

    J. A. Carrillo, X. Feng, S. Guo, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Relative entropy method for particle approximation of the Landau equation for Maxwellian molecules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15035, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    A particle method for the homogeneous Landau equation

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo, Jingwei Hu, Li Wang, and Jeremy Wu. A particle method for the homogeneous Landau equation. Journal of Computational Physics: X , 7:100066, 2020

    2020

  2. [9]

    Random batch particle methods for the homogeneous Landau equation

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo, Shi Jin, and Yijia Tang. Random batch particle methods for the homogeneous Landau equation. Commun. Comput. Phys. , 31(4):997–1019, 2022

    2022

  3. [10]

    G. Chen, L. Chac´ on, and D.C. Barnes. An energy- and charge-conserving, implicit, elec- trostatic particle-in-cell algorithm. Journal of Computational Physics , 230(18):7018–7036, 2011

    2011

  4. [11]

    Derouillat, A

    J. Derouillat, A. Beck, F. P´ erez, T. Vinci, M. Chiaramello, A. Grassi, M. Fl´ e, G. Bouchard, I. Plotnikov, N. Aunai, J. Dargent, C. Riconda, and M. Grech. Smilei : A collaborative, open-source, multi-purpose particle-in-cell code for plasma simulation. Computer Physics Comm...

    2018

  5. [12]

    On the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for hard potentials part i: existence, uniqueness and smoothness

    Laurent Desvillettes and C´ edric Villani. On the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for hard potentials part i: existence, uniqueness and smoothness. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 25(1-2):179–259, 2000

    2000

  6. [13]

    Numerical methods for plasma physics in collisional regimes

    Giacomo Dimarco, Qin Li, Lorenzo Pareschi, and Bokai Yan. Numerical methods for plasma physics in collisional regimes. Journal of Plasma Physics , 81(1):305810106, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Conservative numerical schemes for the vlasov equation

    Francis Filbet, Eric Sonnendr¨ ucker, and Pierre Bertrand. Conservative numerical schemes for the vlasov equation. Journal of Computational Physics , 172(1):166–187, 2001

    2001

  8. [16]

    Particle approximation of some Landau equations

    Nicolas Fournier. Particle approximation of some Landau equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2(3):451–464, 2009. 19

    2009

  9. [17]

    Well-posedness of the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for soft potentials

    Nicolas Fournier and H´ elene Gu´ erin. Well-posedness of the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for soft potentials. Journal of Functional Analysis , 256(8):2542–2560, 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Propagation of chaos for the Landau equation with moderately soft potentials

    Nicolas Fournier and Maxime Hauray. Propagation of chaos for the Landau equation with moderately soft potentials. The Annals of Probability , 44(6):3581–3660, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    Stability, well-posedness and regularity of the homogeneous Landau equation for hard potentials

    Nicolas Fournier and Daniel Heydecker. Stability, well-posedness and regularity of the homogeneous Landau equation for hard potentials. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire, 38(6):1961–1987, 2021

    1961

  12. [20]

    The Landau equation does not blow up

    Nestor Guillen and Luis Silvestre. The Landau equation does not blow up. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09420, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Jenkins and Dario Span` o

    Paul A. Jenkins and Dario Span` o. Exact simulation of the Wright–Fisher diffusion. The Annals of Applied Probability , 27(3), June 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    Random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Jian-Guo Liu. Random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems. Journal of Computational Physics , 400:108877, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Kinetic equation for the case of Coulomb interaction

    Lev Davidovich Landau. Kinetic equation for the case of Coulomb interaction. Phys. Zs. Sov. Union , 10:154–164, 1936

    1936

  16. [24]

    Adaptive sampling accelerates the hybrid deviational particle simulations

    Zhengyang Lei and Sihong Shao. Adaptive sampling accelerates the hybrid deviational particle simulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19584 , 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    A note on the exact sim- ulation of spherical Brownian motion

    Aleksandar Mijatovi´ c, Veno Mramor, and Ger´ onimo Uribe Bravo. A note on the exact sim- ulation of spherical Brownian motion. Statistics & Probability Letters, 165:108836, October 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Cubic interpolated propagation scheme for solving the hyper-dimensional vlasov—poisson equation in phase space

    Takashi Nakamura and Takashi Yabe. Cubic interpolated propagation scheme for solving the hyper-dimensional vlasov—poisson equation in phase space. Computer Physics Com- munications, 120(2):122–154, 1999

    1999

  19. [27]

    Russo, and Giuseppe Toscani

    Lorenzo Pareschi, G. Russo, and Giuseppe Toscani. Fast spectral methods for the Fokker– Planck–Landau collision operator. Journal of Computational Physics, 165(1):216–236, 2000

    2000

  20. [28]

    Particle-in-cell plus direct simulation Monte Carlo (PIC-DSMC) approach for self-consistent plasma-gas simulations

    Vladimir V Serikov, Shinji Kawamoto, and Kenichi Nanbu. Particle-in-cell plus direct simulation Monte Carlo (PIC-DSMC) approach for self-consistent plasma-gas simulations. IEEE transactions on plasma science , 27(5):1389–1398, 1999

    1999

  21. [29]

    On the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for Maxwellian molecules

    C´ edric Villani. On the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for Maxwellian molecules. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 8(06):957–983, 1998

    1998

  22. [30]

    A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory

    C´ edric Villani. A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory. Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics , 1(71-305):3–8, 2002

    2002

  23. [31]

    James C. Whitney. Finite difference methods for the Fokker–Planck equation. Journal of Computational Physics , 6(3):483–509, 1970

    1970

  24. [32]

    A hybrid method with deviational particles for spatial inhomogeneous plasma

    Bokai Yan. A hybrid method with deviational particles for spatial inhomogeneous plasma. Journal of Computational Physics , 309:18–36, 2016. 20

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.