Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Gravity potential determination based on China Space Station Dual-frequency microwave links frequency transfer

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A dual-frequency microwave-link model can measure gravity potential from the China Space Station to centimeter-level accuracy.

desk verdict A genuinely new dual-frequency X-configuration model for CSS microwave links, but the cm-level accuracy claim is supported only by a round-trip simulation with TLE-as-truth; deserves review with a demand for real-data or realistic error analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00304 v1 pith:UOGKMREJ submitted 2024-12-31 physics.geo-ph gr-qc

Peng Fei Zhang , Chen Xiang Wang , Li Hong Li , Lei Wang , Zi Yu Shen , Rui Xu , An Ning , Abdelrahim Ruby
show 1 more author
Wen-Bin Shen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.geo-phgr-qc
keywords GravitypotentialfrequencyshiftChinaSpaceStationMicrowavelinksGeneralRelativityrelativisticgeodesyopticalatomicclockdual-frequencytransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the China Space Station's microwave time-and-frequency links can act as a gravity instrument: by measuring the frequency shift of a signal travelling between the station and a ground clock, the difference in gravity potential between the two sites can be recovered. The authors derive a one-way frequency-transfer expansion to order $c^{-4}$, adding Doppler, gravitational, ionospheric, tropospheric, and tide terms, and then combine uplink and downlink signals at the same 30.4 GHz frequency with opposite circular polarizations so the largest propagation and Doppler errors cancel. A one-month simulation over the station's orbital arcs recovers the ground gravity potential with standard deviations of about 0.7 to 1.2 $\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$, corresponding to roughly 7 to 12 cm in height. If the result carries over to real data, clock-based relativistic geodesy becomes practical from an ordinary space station.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the one-way frequency-transfer expansion to order $c^{-4}$, following the post-Newtonian formalism for time and frequency transfer in the field of an axisymmetric rotating body. The ratio of received to emitted proper frequencies is expanded into Doppler terms and gravitational terms, and then the dual-frequency (X-configuration) combination is built so that uplink and downlink at 30.4 GHz with opposite circular polarizations cancel the first-order Doppler effect, most of the ionosphere (including its second-order term), and the troposphere. The remaining signal is the gravity frequency shift, i.e., the gravitational redshift $\Delta\nu/\nu \approx \Delta W/c^2$, which is converted to the static gravity potential $W = U + v^2/2$ of the ground station. The residual error budget after all corrections is dominated by the optical atomic clock stability, which is why the model's accuracy scales with the clock.

What would settle it

Use real CSS microwave-link data over a ground station whose gravity potential is independently known from levelling and absolute gravimetry, with an independent GNSS-based orbit solution rather than the simulated orbit. The central claim fails if the recovered potential differs from the independent value by more than the predicted $\sim 1\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$ scatter after clock noise is characterized.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the gravity potential of a ground station can be measured from the China Space Station by using the gravitational frequency shift of a microwave carrier, after the special-relativistic Doppler shift and the atmospheric propagation delays are removed. The key design is an X-configuration dual-frequency transfer: the ground station and the station transmit to each other at the same carrier frequency (30.4 GHz) but with opposite circular polarizations, so the first-order Doppler terms nearly cancel, the ionospheric terms (which depend on polarization) partially cancel, and the non-dispersive tropospheric delay drops out of the combination. What remains is dominated by the gravity frequency shift and by the optical clocks' noise. In a 31-day simulation with the station's clock stability of about $2\times10^{-15}/\sqrt{\tau}$, the ground potential is recovered as $(62636468.67 \pm 0.71)\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$ for a 5° cutoff elevation, with biases between $0.09$ and $1.13\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$ across cutoffs. The authors conclude that this demonstrates centimeter-level accuracy in height, since $1\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$ is roughly 10 cm of geopotential height.

Load-bearing premise

The simulation treats a two-line-element orbit of the station as the true orbit and adds only ±0.1 m and ±1 mm/s white noise, while using the same atmospheric, tidal, and gravity models to generate and then invert the observations, so real orbit errors and model biases are not independently tested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model works with real CSS data, ground gravity potential can be monitored at roughly decimeter height accuracy from orbit, providing an independent check on levelling networks and geoid models.
  • The same frequency-cancellation scheme could be applied to any satellite with identical uplink and downlink carriers, not just the China Space Station.
  • Because the residual error budget is clock-dominated, replacing the current optical clock with a $10^{-19}$-level clock would push the achievable height accuracy toward 1 cm, as the paper notes.
  • The derivation to order $c^{-4}$ gives a complete reference formalism for future space-clock chronometric geodesy experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The simulation is largely self-consistent: the same TLE-based orbit, ionosphere model, troposphere mapping, and gravity model are used to generate the synthetic observations and then to invert them, so orbit and atmosphere model errors mostly cancel in the round trip; real data will likely show larger scatter unless independent orbit and atmosphere products are used.
  • The bias pattern across cutoff elevations (about 1.1 m²/s² at 5°, 0.1 at 10°, 0.7 at 15°) suggests residual low-elevation modeling error; a test would be to check whether the recovered potential drifts systematically with cutoff angle on real data.
  • The method is essentially a two-way satellite time-and-frequency transfer, so it could be combined with a network of ground clocks to produce a unified global vertical datum without physical levelling across oceans.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a relativistic one-way frequency-transfer model up to order c^-4 and a dual-frequency (uplink/downlink) combination for the China Space Station microwave links, including tropospheric, ionospheric, and solid-Earth-tide effects. It then simulates one month of CSS-to-LJTF observations at 30.4 GHz with simulated optical-clock noise and reports recovered ground gravity-potential values with biases and standard deviations around 0.1-1.2 m^2/s^2, which the authors translate into a claim of centimeter-level GP accuracy. The theoretical derivation follows standard post-Newtonian frequency-transfer references, and the simulation is carefully constructed, but the validation is a closed-loop experiment in which the same orbit and the same environmental models are used both to generate and to invert the signals.

Significance. If the accuracy claim could be independently supported, the paper would be a useful contribution to chronometric geodesy: the same-frequency, opposite-polarization two-link combination is an interesting way to suppress Doppler, ionospheric, and tropospheric effects, and the c^-4 treatment is more complete than in many earlier satellite-clock studies. The simulation infrastructure is a strength: clock-noise synthesis is checked with the modified Allan deviation, and the analysis of cutoff-elevation angle on observation duration and precision is informative. However, the central claim is currently supported only by a self-consistent simulation in which TLE orbit error and atmospheric/tidal model errors cancel by construction. The reported biases and STDs in Table 5 therefore do not yet establish centimeter-level GP determination for real CSS data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1, Figure 4, Table 5] The load-bearing validation step is self-consistent in a way that hides the dominant error sources. Section 4.1 states that the CSS trajectory is 'calculated by the TLEs and used as the real orbital data', and only white-noise errors of ±0.1 m and ±1 mm/s are added; however TLE ephemerides are not accurate at that level, and the 10-cm/1-mm-s values cited from [66] are post-processing POD design values, not TLE accuracies. Because the same TLE orbit is used both to generate the synthetic Doppler and gravitational frequency shifts and to invert them through Eq. (3.18), any TLE orbit error cancels in the round trip and never enters the biases and STDs of Table 5. The conclusion in Section 5 that the model yields centimeter-level GP is therefore not established by this experiment. The simulation should inject a realistic TLE error covariance, including correlated along-track errors, or use a POD-quality orbit for the inversion that differs from the orbit used in generation, and propagate the resulting errors through Eq. (3.18).
  2. [Section 4.1, Table 4] The atmospheric and tidal corrections are also generated and inverted with the same models, so the residual-error budget in Table 4 is assumed rather than realized. Section 4.1 and Figure 4 show that IRI2016 is used to simulate the ionospheric frequency shifts and also to correct them, VMF3/ZTD is used for the troposphere on both sides of the loop, and EGM2008 plus the same solid-Earth-tide model supplies both the forward GP and the inverse corrections. The quoted residuals in Table 4 (e.g., ionospheric < 1.5e-19, tropospheric < 2.1e-17, total < 4.3e-17) therefore do not come from any independent mismatch between the forward and inverse models; they are bounds taken from external references. The statement that 'the main errors come from the clock errors' is a consequence of this self-consistency, not a demonstrated result. A supporting experiment should either process real MWL frequency data with independent atmospheric products, or inject deliberately mismodeled TEC, weather, and tidal corrections into the forward path so that the inversion is tested against errors of realistic magnitude.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.4)] Equation (3.4) and the sentence following it state that 'there are two nonvanishing post-Newtonian parameters, gamma = 1 and beta = 0. This indicates that equation (3.4) applies solely to stationary gravitational fields [44].' In the standard PPN framework, general relativity corresponds to gamma = beta = 1, so beta = 0 is not general relativity and needs either a definition of the nonstandard beta used here, a correction to beta = 1, or an explicit explanation of why the stationary-field limit of Linet and Teyssandier [44] leads to beta = 0. Because the c^-4 term is estimated at about 5e-19 in Section 3.1, this issue is unlikely to change the GP accuracies in Table 5, but it undermines the paper's separate claim that the model is 'suitable for measurements at the magnitude of 10^-19' and should be fixed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The 'centimeter-level accuracy' wording is stronger than the reported statistics in Table 5. At a 5-degree cutoff the bias is 1.13 m^2/s^2 (about 11 cm in height) and at 15 degrees the STD is 1.18 m^2/s^2 (about 12 cm); please state which statistic supports the centimeter-level claim and qualify the statement accordingly.
  2. [Section 3.2, Table 2] The term 'dual-frequency' is misleading because the selected working points are the same carrier frequency 30.4 GHz for uplink and downlink with opposite circular polarizations; please use 'dual-link' or 'dual-polarization' where appropriate, or explain why the two links are called dual-frequency.
  3. [Section 4.2, Figure 10] The text says that except for the 15-degree case all observations fall within the 3-sigma range; please state how many 15-degree outliers were identified and whether they were excluded before the weighted average in Table 5.
  4. [Section 4.1] The reproducibility of the clock-noise simulation would be improved by reporting the noise-type coefficients (WFM/RWFM), the integration time, and the random seed used with Allantools, in addition to the MDEV check in Figure 6.
  5. [Table 1] The abbreviation for the cold atomic microwave clock appears as both 'CAMC' and 'CMAC'; please make it consistent throughout the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Centimeter-level accuracy claim is a round-trip test: the synthetic frequency signal is generated by the same Eq. (3.18) model that is then inverted, so the recovered GP is the input GP by construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.1 (simulation setup, Eq. 3.18, Fig. 4), Section 4.2 (Table 5), Conclusion]
    "By simulating all these frequency shifts and combining them with the up and down MWLs at proper frequency 30.4 GHz, we can obtain the observation data (See Figure 4). We generate all 31 days of data for the simulation experiment. The GP of the LJTF can be determined by the dual-frequency transfer model (see equation 3.18) proposed in this study. ... This study demonstrates that the proposed model allows for the measurement of the GP with centimeter-level accuracy."

    The 'observation data' are produced by the same forward equations (3.10)-(3.18), with the same EGM2008 gravitational potential and tide inputs, IRI2016/IGRF ionosphere, and VMF3/ZTD troposphere that the inversion via (3.18) then uses. Equation (3.18) was obtained by algebraically solving those same equations for the ground-station gravity potential, so in the noiseless limit the recovered GP is the input GP by construction. Hence the reported biases (1.13/0.09/0.66 m²/s²) and STDs (0.71/0.89/1.18 m²/s²) measure the internal consistency of the model under injected clock noise, not the effect of independent orbit, atmospheric, tidal, or clock errors. The Conclusion's 'centimeter-level accuracy' therefore extends a self-consistency check into a measurement-capability claim.

full rationale

Section 3's frequency-shift formulas are independently grounded in external relativity and atmospheric references, and no parameter is fitted to the target GP, so this is not a case of a fitted prediction. The circularity enters at the validation stage. The 'simulation frequency signal' is constructed with the same EGM2008/IRI2016/VMF3/tide/PPN algorithms that the dual-frequency inversion (3.18) applies, and (3.18) is the algebraic inverse of that construction to the retained order. Recovering the input GP from such a signal tests numerical implementation and noise averaging only. Table 5's biases and STDs therefore support an internal-consistency statement, not the conclusion's unqualified 'cm-level accuracy' measurement claim. The use of TLE as 'real orbital data' with only ±0.1 m/1 mm/s added noise is a related external-validity limitation: real TLE errors would appear in both Doppler and geometry terms and would not cancel as in this round-trip setup. The minor self-citation [35] for clock stability is not load-bearing, since the stability values are also externally documented; hence the score reflects the construction-equivalent simulation, not citation practice.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the target gravity potential; the clock stabilities are design values and the residual error percentages are taken from cited models. The model relies on imported relativistic formulas, atmospheric and tidal model assumptions, and an optimistic orbit truth assumption. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption One-way frequency shift formulas to order c^-4 from Linet and Teyssandier (2002) are valid
    Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.6) are imported from [44]; the paper does not derive them.
  • ad hoc to paper PPN parameters gamma=1 and beta=0 describe the Earth's stationary gravitational field
    Section 3.1, after Eq. (3.4); this is nonstandard (GR has beta=1) and unexplained, which casts doubt on the c^-4 gravitational terms.
  • domain assumption Ionospheric frequency shift can be modeled with Eq. (3.10) and second-order terms, with residual correction 5%
    Section 3.1 and Section 4.2; IRI2016 and IGRF used for TEC and geomagnetic field.
  • domain assumption Tropospheric frequency shift can be modeled with Eq. (3.12), with residual correction 10% via VMF3/ZTD
    Section 3.1 and Section 4.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The TLE-derived CSS orbit can serve as truth with only ±0.1 m and ±1 mm/s white noise added
    Section 4.1; real TLE error is orders of magnitude larger, so this is an optimistic modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Tidal potential is adequately captured by second-order Legendre terms and Love numbers, with indirect tide negligible
    Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption For the X configuration, the uplink and downlink propagation angles satisfy theta_u + theta_d ≈ 180°, so cos theta_u ≈ -cos theta_d
    Section 3.2; used to justify second-order ionospheric cancellation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravity potential determination based on China Space Station Dual-frequency microwave links frequency transfer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOGKMREJ

@misc{pith2026250100304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravity potential determination based on China Space Station Dual-frequency microwave links frequency transfer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOGKMREJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00304}
}
abstract

The China Space Station (CSS) is currently in orbit and carries the high-precision optical atomic clock with stability of approximately $2.0 \times 10^{-15} / \sqrt{\tau}$ in its experiment module. We have developed a model to determine the gravity potential (GP) based on the gravity frequency shift equation and have created both one-way and dual-frequency transfer models up to $c^{-4}$. These models consider effects from the troposphere, ionosphere, and solid Earth tides. The proposed model is suitable for measurements at the magnitude of $10^{-19}$. Based on the CSS mission, we conducted the simulation experiments. The results indicate that when processing the simulation frequency signal using the proposed model, we can obtain the GP with the accuracies of $ (1.13\pm0.71)\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$, $ (0.09\pm0.89)\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$, and $(0.66\pm1.18)\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2}$ for cutoff elevation angles of $5^{\circ}$, $10^{\circ}$ and $15^{\circ}$, respectively. With the high-precision optical atomic clock onboard the CSS, the proposed model enables us to measure the GP differences in the magnitude of centimeter-level accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [66]

    Wang,Precise orbit determination of space station based on GNSS measurement, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    W. Wang,Precise orbit determination of space station based on GNSS measurement, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [44]

    Linet and P

    B. Linet and P. Teyssandier,Time transfer and frequency shift to the order1/c4 in the field of an axisymmetric rotating body, Physical Review D66 (2002) 024045

    work page 2002

  3. [1]

    Einstein,Die feldgleichungen der gravitation, 25 nov 1915, inSitzungsberichte der Koniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp

    A. Einstein,Die feldgleichungen der gravitation, 25 nov 1915, inSitzungsberichte der Koniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 844–847, 1915

    work page 1915

  4. [2]

    Delva, J

    P. Delva, J. Lodewyck, S. Bilicki, E. Bookjans, G. Vallet, R. Le Targat et al.,Test of special relativity using a fiber network of optical clocks, Physical Review Letters118 (2017) 221102

    work page 2017

  5. [3]

    Will,Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge university press (2018)

    C.M. Will,Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge university press (2018)

    2018

  6. [4]

    Mougiakakos and P

    S. Mougiakakos and P. Vanhove,Schwarzschild geodesics from scattering amplitudes to all orders in GN, Journal of High Energy Physics2024 (2024) 1

    work page 2024

  7. [5]

    Bjerhammar,On a relativistic geodesy, Bulletin géodésique 59 (1985) 207

    A. Bjerhammar,On a relativistic geodesy, Bulletin géodésique 59 (1985) 207

    work page 1985

  8. [6]

    W. Shen, D. Chao and J. Ning,On relativistic geoid, Boll Geod Sci Affni52 (1993) 207

    work page 1993

Show all 73 references
  1. [7]

    Delva and J

    P. Delva and J. Geršl,Theoretical tools for relativistic gravimetry, gradiometry and chronometric geodesy and application to a parameterized post-newtonian metric, Universe 3 (2017) 24. – 21 –

    2017

  2. [8]

    Denker, L

    H. Denker, L. Timmen, C. Voigt, S. Weyers, E. Peik, H.S. Margolis et al.,Geodetic methods to determine the relativistic redshift at the level of 10−18 in the context of international timescales: a review and practical results, Journal of Geodesy92 (2018) 487

    2018

  3. [9]

    Guéna, S

    J. Guéna, S. Weyers, M. Abgrall, C. Grebing, V. Gerginov, P. Rosenbusch et al.,First international comparison of fountain primary frequency standards via a long distance optical fiber link, Metrologia 54 (2017) 348

    2017

  4. [10]

    Oelker, R

    E. Oelker, R. Hutson, C. Kennedy, L. Sonderhouse, T. Bothwell, A. Goban et al., Demonstration of 4.8×10−17 stability at 1 s for two independent optical clocks, Nature Photonics 13 (2019) 714

    2019

  5. [11]

    McGrew, X

    W.F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R.J. Fasano, S.A. Schäffer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi et al.,Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level, Nature 564 (2018) 87

    2018

  6. [12]

    Zhiqiang, J

    Z. Zhiqiang, J. Arnold, Kyle, R. Kaewuam and D. Barrett, Murray,176Lu+ clock comparison at the 10−18 level via correlationspectroscopy, Applied Physics 9 (2023) eadg1971

    2023

  7. [13]

    Vessot, M.W

    R.F.C. Vessot, M.W. Levine, E.M. Mattison, E.L. Blomberg, T.E. Hoffman, G.U. Nystrom et al.,Test of relativistic gravitation with a space-borne hydrogen maser, Physical Review Letters 45 (1980) 2081

    1980

  8. [14]

    Shen, W.B

    Z. Shen, W.B. Shen and S. Zhang,Formulation of geopotential difference determination using optical-atomic clocks onboard satellites and on ground based on Doppler cancellation system, Geophysical Journal International206 (2016) 1162

    2016

  9. [15]

    Clock, O

    I. Clock, O. Networking, A. Amy-Klein, E. Benkler, P. Blondé, K. Bongs et al.,International comparison of optical frequencies with transportable optical lattice clocks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22973 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Takamoto, Y

    M. Takamoto, Y. Tanaka and H. Katori,A perspective on the future of transportable optical lattice clocks, Applied Physics Letters120 (2022)

    2022

  11. [17]

    Grotti, S

    J. Grotti, S. Koller, S. Vogt, S. Häfner, U. Sterr, C. Lisdat et al.,Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock, Nature Physics 14 (2018) 437

    2018

  12. [18]

    Hoang, Z

    A.T. Hoang, Z. Shen, K. Wu, A. Ning and W. Shen,Test of determining geopotential difference between two sites at wuhan based on optical clocks’ frequency comparisons, Remote Sensing 14 (2022) 4850

    2022

  13. [19]

    Hoang, Z

    A.T. Hoang, Z. Shen, W. Shen, C. Cai, W. Xu, A. Ning et al.,Determination of the orthometric height difference based on optical fiber frequency transfer technique, Geodesy and Geodynamics 12 (2021) 405

    2021

  14. [20]

    W. Xu, W. Shen, C. Cai, L. Li, L. Wang, A. Ning et al.,Comparison and evaluation of carrier phase PPP and single difference time transfer with multi-GNSS ambiguity resolution, GPS Solutions 26 (2022) 58

    2022

  15. [21]

    Cai, W.B

    C. Cai, W.B. Shen, Z. Shen and W. Xu,Geopotential determination based on precise point positioning time comparison: A case study using simulated observation, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 204283

    2020

  16. [22]

    Defraigne, N

    P. Defraigne, N. Guyennon and C. Bruyninx,GPS Time and Frequency Transfer: PPP and Phase-Only Analysis, International Journal of Navigation & Observation(2008)

    2008

  17. [23]

    Cheng, W

    P. Cheng, W. Shen, X. Sun, C. Cai, K. Wu and Z. Shen,Measuring height difference using two-way satellite time and frequency transfer, Remote Sensing 14 (2022) 451. – 22 –

    2022

  18. [24]

    Huang, M

    Y.-J. Huang, M. Fujieda, H. Takiguchi, W.-H. Tseng and H.-W. Tsao,Stability improvement of an operational two-way satellite time and frequency transfer system, Metrologia 53 (2016) 881

    2016

  19. [25]

    Jiang, V

    Z. Jiang, V. Zhang, T.E. Parker, G. Petit, Y.-J. Huang, D. Piester et al.,Improving two-way satellite time and frequency transfer with redundant links for UTC generation, Metrologia 56 (2019) 025005

    2019

  20. [26]

    Wu and W.-B

    Y. Wu and W.-B. Shen,Simulation experiments on high-precision VGOS time transfer for future geopotential difference determination, Advances in Space Research68 (2021) 2453

    2021

  21. [27]

    P. Wang, G. Wang, Y. Gao, H. Cai and N. Liu,Comparison of VLBI and GNSS common view for time transfer, International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering10 (2019) 15

    2019

  22. [28]

    Chou, D.B

    C.-W. Chou, D.B. Hume, T. Rosenband and D.J. Wineland,Optical clocks and relativity, Science 329 (2010) 1630

    2010

  23. [29]

    Takamoto, I

    M. Takamoto, I. Ushijima, N. Ohmae, T. Yahagi, K. Kokado, H. Shinkai et al.,Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks, Nature Photonics 14 (2020) 411

    2020

  24. [30]

    Cacciapuoti and C

    L. Cacciapuoti and C. Salomon,Atomic clock ensemble in space, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 327, p. 012049, 2011

    2011

  25. [31]

    Meynadier, P

    F. Meynadier, P. Delva, C. le Poncin-Lafitte, C. Guerlin and P. Wolf,Atomic clock ensemble in space (ACES) data analysis, Classical and Quantum Gravity35 (2018) 035018

    2018

  26. [32]

    Guo,A precise time synchronization method between satellite and ground and its analysis of motion delay error, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    Y. Guo,A precise time synchronization method between satellite and ground and its analysis of motion delay error, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    2021

  27. [33]

    Y. Guo, S. Gao, Y. Bai, Z. Pan, Y. Liu, X. Lu et al.,A new space-to-ground microwave-based two-way time synchronization method for next-generation space atomic clocks, Remote Sensing 14 (2022)

    2022

  28. [34]

    tiangong

    H. Yang,The "tiangong" chinese space station project, Fronter of Engineer Management5 (2018) 278

    2018

  29. [35]

    W. Shen, P. Zhang, Z. Shen, R. Xu, X. Sun, M. Ashry et al.,Testing gravitational redshift based on microwave frequency links onboard the china space station, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 064031

    2023

  30. [36]

    manned space engineering office,China Space Station Science Experiment Resource Manual, 2019

    C. manned space engineering office,China Space Station Science Experiment Resource Manual, 2019

    2019

  31. [37]

    Sun, W.-B

    X. Sun, W.-B. Shen, Z. Shen, C. Cai, W. Xu and P. Zhang,Test of gravitational red-shift based on tri-frequency combination of microwave frequency links, The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021) 1

    2021

  32. [38]

    Cacciapuoti and C

    L. Cacciapuoti and C. Salomon,Space clocks and fundamental tests: The ACES experiment, European Physical Journal Special Topics172 (2009) 57

    2009

  33. [39]

    Katori,Optical lattice clocks and quantum metrology, Nature Photonics 5 (2011) 203

    H. Katori,Optical lattice clocks and quantum metrology, Nature Photonics 5 (2011) 203

    2011

  34. [40]

    Z. Zhu, D. Luo, L. Zhou, Z. Deng, Y. Liu, C. Gu et al.,High-power femtosecond optical frequency comb, inAdvanced Solid State Lasers, pp. JM5A–20, Optical Society of America, 2019. – 23 –

    2019

  35. [41]

    D. Wei, S. Takahashi, K. Takamasu and H. Matsumoto,Analysis of the temporal coherence function of a femtosecond optical frequency comb, Optics express 17 (2009) 7011

    2009

  36. [42]

    Lv,Program of space stationyb atomic clock, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    B. Lv,Program of space stationyb atomic clock, inThe 12th China Satellite Navigation Conference, CSNC 2021, 2021

    2021

  37. [43]

    Tanaka and H

    Y. Tanaka and H. Katori,Exploring potential applications of optical lattice clocks in a plate subduction zone, Journal of Geodesy95 (2021) 1

    2021

  38. [45]

    Wu and C.-G

    B. Wu and C.-G. Huang,The gravitational field outside a spatially compact stationary source in a generic fourth-order theory of gravity, Journal of High Energy Physics2023 (2023) 1

    2023

  39. [46]

    Blanchet, C

    L. Blanchet, C. Salomon, P. Teyssandier and P. Wolf,Relativistic theory for time and frequency transfer to orderc−3, Astronomy & Astrophysics370 (2001) 320

    2001

  40. [47]

    Jacobs and T

    J.A. Jacobs and T. Watanabe,Doppler frequency changes in radio waves propagating through a moving ionosphere, Radio Science 1 (1966) 257

    1966

  41. [48]

    Bennett,The ray theory of doppler frequency shifts, Australian Journal of Physics21 (1968) 259

    J. Bennett,The ray theory of doppler frequency shifts, Australian Journal of Physics21 (1968) 259

    1968

  42. [49]

    Millman and M.C

    G.H. Millman and M.C. Arabadjis,Tropospheric and ionospheric phase perturbations and doppler frequency shift effects, Tech. Rep. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SYRACUSE NY MILITARY ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS OPERATION (1984)

    1984

  43. [50]

    Shen, W.B

    Z. Shen, W.B. Shen, T. Zhang, L. He, Z. Cai, X. Tian et al.,An improved approach for testing gravitational redshift via satellite-based three frequency links combination, Advances in Space Research68 (2021) 2776

    2021

  44. [51]

    Hoque and N

    M.M. Hoque and N. Jakowski,Higher order ionospheric effects in precise GNSS positioning, Journal of Geodesy81 (2007) 259

    2007

  45. [52]

    Hoque and N

    M.M. Hoque and N. Jakowski,Ionospheric propagation effects on gnss signals and new correction approaches, Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Signal, Theory and Applications (2012)

    2012

  46. [53]

    Zhang, W.-B

    P. Zhang, W.-B. Shen, C. Wang, Z. Shen, C. Cai, X. Sun et al.,Higher order ionospheric effects in testing gravitational redshift by space frequency signal transfer, Astronomy & Astrophysics 679 (2023) A86

    2023

  47. [54]

    Rüeger,Refractive index formulae for radio waves

    J. Rüeger,Refractive index formulae for radio waves. FIG XXII international congress, washington, dc, 13 pp, 2002

    2002

  48. [55]

    Duchayne, F

    L. Duchayne, F. Mercier and P. Wolf,Orbit determination for next generation space clocks, Astronomy & Astrophysics504 (2009) 653

    2009

  49. [56]

    Mehlstäubler, G

    T.E. Mehlstäubler, G. Grosche, C. Lisdat, P.O. Schmidt and H. Denker,Atomic clocks for geodesy, Reports on Progress in Physics81 (2018) 064401

    2018

  50. [57]

    Müller, D

    J. Müller, D. Dirkx, S.M. Kopeikin, G. Lion, I. Panet, G. Petit et al.,High performance clocks and gravity field determination, Space Science Reviews214 (2018) 1

    2018

  51. [58]

    Riesing,Orbit determination from two line element sets of iss-deployed cubesats,

    K. Riesing,Orbit determination from two line element sets of iss-deployed cubesats,

  52. [59]

    Pavlis, S.A

    N.K. Pavlis, S.A. Holmes, S.C. Kenyon and J.K. Factor,The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008), Journal of geophysical research: solid earth 117 (2012) . – 24 –

    2012

  53. [60]

    Petit and B

    G. Petit and B. Luzum,IERS conventions (2010), Tech. Rep. Bureau International des Poids et mesures sevres (france) (2010)

    2010

  54. [61]

    Boisits, D

    J. Boisits, D. Landskron and J. Böhm,VMF3o: the Vienna Mapping Functions for optical frequencies, Journal of Geodesy94 (2020) 1

    2020

  55. [62]

    Landskron and J

    D. Landskron and J. Böhm,VMF3/GPT3: refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping functions, Journal of Geodesy92 (2018) 349

    2018

  56. [63]

    D.W. Allan et al.,Time and frequency(time-domain) characterization, estimation, and prediction of precision clocks and oscillators, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control34 (1987) 647

    1987

  57. [64]

    Allan, M.A

    D.W. Allan, M.A. Weiss and J.L. Jespersen,A frequency-domain view of time-domain characterization of clocks and time and frequency distribution systems, inProceedings of the 45th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control 1991, pp. 667–678, IEEE, 1991

    1991

  58. [65]

    Zucca and P

    C. Zucca and P. Tavella,A mathematical model for the atomic clock error in case of jumps, Metrologia 52 (2015) 514

    2015

  59. [67]

    Munk and D.E

    W.H. Munk and D.E. Cartwright,Tidal spectroscopy and prediction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 259 (1966) 533

    1966

  60. [68]

    Cartwright,Oceanic tides, Reports on Progress in Physics40 (1977) 665

    D.E. Cartwright,Oceanic tides, Reports on Progress in Physics40 (1977) 665

    1977

  61. [69]

    A. Liu, N. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Wang and H. Yuan,Assessment of NeQuick and IRI-2016 models during different geomagnetic activities in global scale: Comparison with GPS-TEC, dSTEC, Jason-TEC and GIM, Advances in Space Research63 (2019) 3978

    2019

  62. [70]

    Alken, E

    P. Alken, E. Thebault, C. Beggan, J. Aubert, J. Baerenzung, W.J. Brown et al.,Evaluation of candidate models for the 13th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Earth, Planets and Space73 (2021) 1

    2021

  63. [71]

    Saastamoinen,Introduction to practical computation of astronomical refraction, Bulletin Géodésique (1946-1975) 106 (1972) 383

    J. Saastamoinen,Introduction to practical computation of astronomical refraction, Bulletin Géodésique (1946-1975) 106 (1972) 383

    1972

  64. [72]

    Hartmann and H.-G

    T. Hartmann and H.-G. Wenzel,The hw95 tidal potential catalogue, Geophysical research letters 22 (1995) 3553

    1995

  65. [73]

    Su and X

    L. Su and X. Zhou,Adaptive determination algorithm of wavelet decomposing scale based on 3 sigma criterion, in2009 International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications, pp. 1–4, IEEE, 2009. – 25 –

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.