Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Second order estimates for $\chi$-semi convex solutions of Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that admissible, χ-semi-convex solutions of complex Hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds satisfy a uniform second-order bound.

desk verdict A plausible and useful weakening of the convexity assumption for complex Hessian second-order estimates, held up by a non-self-contained concavity lemma that needs referee verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01017 v2 pith:E4ZXQACU submitted 2025-01-02 math.AP

Xiaojuan Chen , Qiang Tu , Ni Xiang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J1553C5558J0535B45
keywords complexHessianequationssecondorderestimatessemi-convexityHermitianmanifoldsconcavityinequalityapriorielementarysymmetricfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a uniform second-order estimate, a bound of the form $|D\bar D u|\le C$, for smooth admissible solutions of complex Hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds. The estimate is established under the assumption that the form $\chi$ is semi-convex, meaning all its eigenvalues are bounded below by a constant $-A$, rather than under the stronger assumption $\chi\in\Gamma_{k+1}(M)$ used in earlier work. Because the equation carries gradient terms on both sides and the background metric may have torsion, the main difficulty is controlling third-order terms; the paper's response is a modified concavity inequality for the $k$-th elementary symmetric function. A uniform $C^2$ bound of this kind is the key a priori estimate needed to run the continuity method for the equation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified concavity inequality (Lemma 1.2) for the $k$-th elementary symmetric function $\sigma_k$ of the eigenvalues of a Hermitian tensor. The inequality says that when the eigenvalues lie in the Gårding cone $\Gamma_k$ with $\lambda_1\ge\cdots\ge\lambda_n>-A$ and $\lambda_1$ is large, the negative second-derivative terms from differentiating the equation twice are bounded below by a positive multiple of $\sigma_k^{11}|\omega_{11j}|^2/(\lambda_1\sigma_k)$ plus lower-order terms, with the loss factor $(1-\epsilon_0)$ for arbitrarily small $\epsilon_0$. The proof transfers the real-case estimates (3.27) and (3.73) of [43] to complex Hermitian tensors, and the final section feeds this inequality into the auxiliary function $Q=\log\lambda_1+\varphi(|\nabla u|^2)+\phi(u)$, using the perturbation argument of [6] to make the largest eigenvalue smooth and the Hermitian commutation formulas of [37] together with the symmetric-function identities of [2] to control all third-order terms.

What would settle it

The most direct check is algebraic: for $n=2$ and $k=2$, compute both sides of (1.5) explicitly for a Hermitian matrix $W$ with eigenvalues in $\Gamma_k$, $\lambda_n>-A$, and $\lambda_1$ large, for each index $j$ and for arbitrarily small $\epsilon_0>0$; a single violation would refute Lemma 1.2, and since that lemma is the step importing the real estimates, Theorem 1.1 would be left without proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: on a compact Hermitian manifold $(M,\omega)$ of complex dimension $n$, if $\chi'(z,u)\ge\epsilon\omega$ and $u$ is an admissible, $\chi$-semi-convex $C^\infty$ solution of the Hessian equation $\chi^k\wedge\omega^{n-k}=\psi(z,Du,u)\omega^n$, then all second covariant derivatives of $u$ are bounded by a constant depending only on $(M,\omega)$, $n$, $k$, $\epsilon$, $\chi'$, $\psi$, $a$, $\sup_M|u|$, and $\sup_M|Du|$. The proof establishes a complex version of the real-variable concavity inequality, adjusting the coefficients so that the good third-order terms are retained even though complex conjugacy removes some terms that the real proof could use. A direct consequence is that the second-order estimate survives under the weaker and more natural semi-convexity assumption instead of the full cone condition $\chi\in\Gamma_{k+1}(M)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the real-variable concavity estimates (3.27) and (3.73) of [43] continue to hold for complex Hermitian tensors with torsion, a transfer the proof invokes rather than reproduces; if that transfer fails, the key inequality (1.5) and with it Theorem 1.1 collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1.1 is correct, the uniform second-order estimate requires only semi-convexity of $\chi$, not the stronger condition $\chi\in\Gamma_{k+1}(M)$ used in earlier second-order estimates.
  • Corollary 1 follows directly: the same estimate holds whenever $\sigma_{k+1}(\chi)>-A$, since this lower bound implies $\chi$-semi-convexity.
  • The bound is the main a priori estimate in the continuity method, so a proof of existence of smooth admissible solutions of (1.2) reduces to establishing zero-order and gradient estimates.
  • The estimate covers equations with the gradient term $\psi(z,Du,u)$ on the right-hand side and with torsion terms from the Hermitian metric, extending the earlier $\Gamma_{k+1}$ result to the semi-convex regime.
  • The constant in the estimate does not depend on higher derivatives of $u$, only on the fixed data and on $\sup_M|u|$ and $\sup_M|Du|$, so the bound remains stable along a continuity path.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transferred real-variable estimates genuinely survive in the complex Hermitian setting, the same concavity inequality should be reusable for parabolic or degenerate variants of (1.2) where the $\Gamma_{k+1}$ assumption was previously the bottleneck.
  • The coefficient optimization from $2$ to $1-\epsilon_0$ suggests the method may tolerate position-dependent lower bounds on the eigenvalues, which would be useful for geometric applications where curvature terms enter the estimates.
  • One could stress-test the inequality in the model case $n=k=2$ with explicit formulas for $\sigma_k$; if the constants are not sharp, the proof may yield stronger estimates, and if a violation appears, it would pinpoint the transfer from the real case as the fragile step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies uniform second-order a priori estimates for admissible, χ-semi-convex solutions of the complex Hessian equation (1.2) on compact Hermitian manifolds, where the right-hand side depends on the gradient and the unknown function. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts a bound |DDu| ≤ C under χ′ ≥ εω and χ-semi-convexity, generalizing earlier estimates that required χ ∈ Γ_{k+1}. The proof follows the standard maximum-principle route with an auxiliary function Q = log λ1 + φ(|Du|²) + ϕ(u), a perturbation argument for the largest eigenvalue, and a new 'modified concavity inequality' (Lemma 1.2) that is meant to control the bad third-order terms. The paper is organized into a preliminary section, a section proving Lemma 1.2, and a section proving Theorem 1.1.

Significance. If the proof is correct, the result is a meaningful improvement: it replaces the convexity assumption χ ∈ Γ_{k+1} by the weaker χ-semi-convexity, matching recent developments for real k-Hessian equations, and it does so in the presence of gradient terms and torsion on Hermitian manifolds. The paper is clearly written and follows a natural strategy, with a sensible choice of auxiliary functions and a perturbation argument for the eigenvalue degeneracy. The main weakness is that the central Lemma 1.2 is not self-contained: it imports the key inequalities (3.27) and the deduction of (3.73) from Zhang's real-case paper [43] without reproducing the Hermitian adaptation, and the application of Lemma 1.2 in (4.15) involves a normalization and sign rearrangement that is not explained. These points are load-bearing because Theorem 1.1 rests directly on (1.5). No machine-checked proofs or code are supplied; the contribution is a classical analytic proof whose verification currently depends on unavailable details.

major comments (4)
  1. [3, Lemma 1.2 and Eq. (1.5)] The proof of Lemma 1.2 is not self-contained. The first line invokes (3.27) of Zhang [43], and the nontrivial case (3.4) is dismissed with 'refer to the deduction of (3.73) in [43]' without reproducing the argument. Zhang's inequalities are proved for real k-Hessian equations with symmetric Hessians and real test vectors, whereas the present setting involves a Hermitian tensor W with non-symmetric covariant derivatives and torsion terms coming from (2.4). Since (1.5) is the engine behind (4.15) and hence behind Theorem 1.1, the paper must either prove the Hermitian version of these inequalities or state and prove a precise transfer lemma. As written, the central estimate rests on an unverified import.
  2. [3, proof of Lemma 1.2, display before (3.5)] The displayed calculation preceding (3.5) uses parameters a and M and constants C1, C2, C3, C3' without defining them or explaining their dependencies. The text says 'by assuming λ1 > Mk and M large enough' and later 'by choosing M ≥ 2C3'(c0+1)/(c0ε0)', but the order of choices is not fixed and the parameter a is never assigned a value. Because the final comparison in (3.5) depends on these choices, the proof of (1.5) under the assumption (3.4) cannot be checked as written.
  3. [4, Eq. (4.15)] The application of Lemma 1.2 in (4.15) does not match the statement of the lemma. Lemma 1.2 contains the term -∑ σ^{pp,qq}ω_{ppj}ω_{qqj}/σ_k, while (4.15) has -λ1^{-1}∑σ^{pp,qq}D1χ_{pp}D1χ_{qq} without the /σ_k factor. The lemma's positive K|Djσk|²/σk² term becomes -K|D1ψ|²/(λ1σk) in (4.15), and the lemma's positive (1-ε0)∑_{i>1}... term appears with a negative sign. These discrepancies can be reconciled by multiplying (1.5) by σ_k, moving terms to the other side, and using D1σk = D1ψ, but this rearrangement is not stated. Moreover, such a step needs the boundedness and positivity of σk = ψ, which is available but not explicitly invoked at that point. As written, (4.15) does not follow by direct substitution.
  4. [2, Lemma 2.3] Lemma 2.3, in particular inequalities (2.9) and (2.10), is imported from Dong [10] without proof. These formulas encode the commutator and torsion terms that are specific to the Hermitian setting and are used directly in the proof of Theorem 1.1. The paper should either prove them in an appendix or state the precise hypotheses under which they apply to equation (1.2); relying on a computation lemma with no verification of the current hypotheses leaves a gap in the main proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [1, Introduction, p.2] There is a typo: 'a natural problem is weather we can weaken' should read 'whether we can weaken'.
  2. [2, Notation] The notation σ^{pq}_k is introduced in (2.6) for ∂σ_k/∂χ_{pq}, but the connection to F^{ij} in Lemma 2.1 is not explicit; this creates confusion in formulas such as (2.9) and (4.4) where σ^{pq}_k and F are used interchangeably.
  3. [4, Eq. (4.16)] The chain σ^{ii}_k ≥ σ^{11}_k ≥ kσ_k/(nλ1) used in (4.16) is asserted without proof. It can be justified from Proposition 2.1(8) together with the eigenvalue ordering, but the paper should spell this out.
  4. [References, [43]] Reference [43] is an arXiv preprint (arXiv:2408.10781v1, 2024). Since the proof of Lemma 1.2 depends critically on inequalities (3.27) and (3.73) of that paper, the authors should clarify the version used and, ideally, cite the published version if one exists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is not assumed as an input, and the external dependencies are prior results by non-overlapping authors.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular under the audit criteria. The target second-order estimate (Theorem 1.1) is never used as an input; it is a genuine a priori bound on |DDu| under the weaker χ-semi-convex hypothesis. The two load-bearing external dependencies—Zhang's real-case concavity inequalities (3.27)/(3.73) in [43] and Dong's computation lemmas (2.9)-(2.10) in [10]—are cited results by authors with no overlap with Chen, Tu, and Xiang, and neither cited result contains the target estimate. Section 3 proves Lemma 1.2 by reducing the complex Hermitian inequality to those real-case inequalities, and Section 4 applies Lemma 1.2 to control third-order terms; this is an ordinary dependency on prior work, not a circular reduction. The semi-convex assumption is a hypothesis, not the conclusion, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main caveats, such as the proof of Lemma 1.2 saying 'refer to the deduction of (3.73) in [43]' without reproducing the real-case argument, are completeness or robustness concerns about whether the cited inequalities survive in the Hermitian setting, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities. The theorem's inputs are the geometric data (M, omega), chi', psi, a, A, and epsilon; these are hypotheses, not fitted values. Proof-internal constants N, Lambda, beta, and epsilon_0 are chosen by hand to close the maximum principle, and their exact values do not enter the final estimate. The main external dependencies are concavity inequalities imported from Zhang [43] and computation lemmas from Dong [10].

free parameters (4)
  • A = A > 0, exists by hypothesis (Definition 1.1)
    Semi-convexity lower bound constant; it is an input hypothesis, not fitted to data, and appears in the final estimate constant.
  • N = large, unspecified
    Growth constant in the auxiliary function phi(s)=e^{Ns}; chosen large enough in Section 4 to make the final coefficient positive.
  • Lambda = large, unspecified
    Growth constant in the auxiliary function phi(t)=e^{Lambda(-t+T)}; chosen with Lambda >> N to satisfy the inequality in (4.1) and later steps.
  • beta and epsilon_0 = small, related by epsilon_0 = 3 beta
    Small constants used in Cauchy-Schwarz absorption arguments in Lemma 1.2 and Section 4; chosen after the fact to close the estimates.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The concavity inequalities (3.27) and the deduction (3.73) from Zhang [43] for real k-Hessian equations transfer to the complex Hermitian setting after the conjugacy modifications sketched in Section 3.
    Lemma 1.2 is the new technical core, but its proof starts from these real-case inequalities and says the rest is similar. If this transfer fails, Theorem 1.1 loses its key inequality.
  • domain assumption The local computation lemmas (2.9) and (2.10) from Dong [10] hold for equation (1.2) on a Hermitian manifold with gradient terms on both sides.
    The paper cites [10] instead of proving these long computations; they are used directly in Section 4 to differentiate the equation twice.
  • ad hoc to paper The auxiliary functions phi(s)=e^{Ns} and phi(t)=e^{Lambda(-t+T)} with N, Lambda large satisfy the coefficient inequalities (4.1), (4.16), and (4.17).
    The maximum principle estimate only closes after choosing N and Lambda with prescribed orderings; the paper asserts such choices exist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second order estimates for $\chi$-semi convex solutions of Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E4ZXQACU

@misc{pith2026250101017,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second order estimates for $\chi$-semi convex solutions of Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E4ZXQACU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01017}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we establish the modified concavity inequality for complex Hessian equations under the semi-convexity assumption inspired by Lu \cite{Lu23} and Zhang \cite{Z24} for real case. Then second order estimates for admissible solutions of complex Hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds with both sides of equations depending on gradient terms are obtained by taking advantage of the crucial inequality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    $C^2$ estimates for $k$-Hessian equations and a rigidity theorem

    R. Zhang, C 2 estimates for k-Hessian equations and a rigidity theorem, arXiv: 2408.10781v1, 2024. 18

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [10]

    Dong, Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations with gradient terms on both sides, J

    W. Dong, Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations with gradient terms on both sides, J. Differ. Equ., 271(2021), 128-151

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Alesker, M

    S. Alesker, M. Verbitsky, Quaternionic Monge-Amp` ere equation and Calabi problem for HKT- manifolds, Israel J. Math., 176(2010), 109-138

    work page 2010

  4. [2]

    Ball, Differentiability properties of symmetric and isotropic functions, Duke Math

    J. Ball, Differentiability properties of symmetric and isotropic functions, Duke Math. J., 51(1984), 699-728

    work page 1984

  5. [3]

    Blocki, Weak solutions to the complex Hessian equation, Ann

    Z. Blocki, Weak solutions to the complex Hessian equation, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 55(2005), 1735-1756

    work page 2005

  6. [4]

    Caffarelli, L

    L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg, J. Spruck, The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second order elliptic equations, III: Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian, Acta Math., 155(1985), 261-301

    work page 1985

  7. [5]

    Cherrier, ´Equations de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es Hermitiennes compactes, Bull

    P. Cherrier, ´Equations de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es Hermitiennes compactes, Bull. Sc. Math., 111(1987), 343-385

    work page 1987

  8. [6]

    Chu, A simple proof of curvature estimates for convex solution of k-Hessian equation, Proc

    J. Chu, A simple proof of curvature estimates for convex solution of k-Hessian equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 149(2021), 3541-3552

    work page 2021

Show all 45 references
  1. [7]

    J. Chu, L. Huang, X. Zhu, The Fu-Yau equation in higher dimensions, Peking Math. J., 2(2019), 71-97

    2019

  2. [8]

    J. Chu, L. Huang, X. Zhu, The Fu-Yau equation on compact astheno-K¨ ahler manifolds, Adv. Math., 346(2019), 908-945

    2019

  3. [9]

    Dinew, S

    S. Dinew, S. Kolodziej, A priori estimates for complex Hessian equations, Anal. PDE, 7(2014), 227-244

    2014

  4. [11]

    Dong, Second order estimates for a class of complex Hessian equations on Hermitian mani- folds, J

    W. Dong, Second order estimates for a class of complex Hessian equations on Hermitian mani- folds, J. Funct. Anal., 281(2021), 109121

    2021

  5. [12]

    W. Dong, C. Li, Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds, Discre. Cont. Dyna. Syst., 41(2021), 2619-2633

    2021

  6. [13]

    K. Feng, H. Ge, T. Zheng, The Dirichlet Problem of Fully Nonlinear Equations on Hermitian Manifolds, arXiv: 1905.02412, 2019

    1905 arXiv

  7. [14]

    A. Fino, Y. Li, S. Salamon, L. Vezzoni, The Calabi-Yau equation on 4-manifolds over 2-tori, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 365(2013), 1551-1575

    2013

  8. [15]

    J. Fu, S. Yau, A Monge-Amp` ere-type equation motivated by string theory, Comm. Anal. Geom., 15(2007), 29-75

    2007

  9. [16]

    J. Fu, S. Yau, The theory of superstring with flux on non-K¨ ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Amp` ere equation, J. Differ. Geom., 78(2008), 369-428

    2008

  10. [17]

    Gerhardt, Curvature problems, Series in Geometry and Topology, vol., International Press of Boston Inc., Sommerville, 39(2006)

    C. Gerhardt, Curvature problems, Series in Geometry and Topology, vol., International Press of Boston Inc., Sommerville, 39(2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    B. Guan, Q. Li, Complex Monge-Amp` ere equations on Hermitian manifolds, arXiv: 0906.3548, 2009

    2009 arXiv

  12. [19]

    B. Guan, X. Nie, Fully nonlinear elliptic equations with gradient terms on Hermitian manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not., 16(2023), 14006-14042. 17

    2023

  13. [20]

    Hanani, ´Equations du type de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es hermitiennes compactes, J

    A. Hanani, ´Equations du type de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es hermitiennes compactes, J. Funct. Anal., 137(1996), 49-75

    1996

  14. [21]

    Hou, Complex Hessian equation on K¨ ahler manifold, Int

    Z. Hou, Complex Hessian equation on K¨ ahler manifold, Int. Math. Res. Not., 2009(2009), 3098- 3111

    2009

  15. [22]

    Z. Hou, X. Ma, D. Wu, A second order estimate for complex Hessian equations on a compact K¨ ahler manifold, Math. Res. Lett., 17(2010), 547-561

    2010

  16. [23]

    Huisken, C

    G. Huisken, C. Sinestrari, Convexity estimates for mean curvature flow and singularities of mean convex surfaces, Acta Math., 183(1999), 45-70

    1999

  17. [24]

    Kolodziej, N

    S. Kolodziej, N. Nguyen, Weak solutions of complex Hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds, Compos. Math., 2016

    2016

  18. [25]

    Li, On the Dirichlet problems for symmetric function equations of the eigenvalues of the complex Hessian, Asian J

    S. Li, On the Dirichlet problems for symmetric function equations of the eigenvalues of the complex Hessian, Asian J. Math., 8(2004), 87-106

    2004

  19. [26]

    Lu, Curvature estimates for semi-convex solutions of Hessian equations in hyperbolic space, Calc

    S. Lu, Curvature estimates for semi-convex solutions of Hessian equations in hyperbolic space, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 62(2023), 23

    2023

  20. [27]

    Lieberman, Second order parabolic differential equations, World Scientific, 1996

    G. Lieberman, Second order parabolic differential equations, World Scientific, 1996

    1996

  21. [28]

    Phong, S

    D. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, A second order estimate for general complex Hessian equations, Anal. PDE, 9(2016), 1693-1709

    2016

  22. [29]

    Phong, S

    D. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, The Fu-Yau equation with negative slope parameter, Invent. Math., 209(2017), 541-576

    2017

  23. [30]

    Phong, S

    D. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, On estimates for the Fu-Yau generalization of a Strominger system, J. Reine Angew. Math., 751(2019), 243-274

    2019

  24. [31]

    Phong, S

    D. Phong, S. Picard, X. Zhang, Fu-Yau Hessian equations, J. Differ. Geom., 118(2021), 147-187

    2021

  25. [32]

    J. Song, B. Weinkove, On the convergence and singularities of the J-flow with applications to the Mabuchi energy, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61(2008), 210-229

    2008

  26. [33]

    Spruck, Geometric aspects of the theory of fully nonlinear elliptic equations, Clay Mathe- matics Proceedings, 2(2005), 283-309

    J. Spruck, Geometric aspects of the theory of fully nonlinear elliptic equations, Clay Mathe- matics Proceedings, 2(2005), 283-309

    2005

  27. [34]

    Sun, On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equations on closed Hermitian manifolds, arXiv: 1412.5001, 2014

    W. Sun, On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equations on closed Hermitian manifolds, arXiv: 1412.5001, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Sz´ ekelyhidi, Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds, J

    G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds, J. Differ. Geom., 109(2018), 337-378

    2018

  29. [36]

    Sz´ ekelyhidi, V

    G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, V. Tosatti, B. Weinkove, Gauduchon metrics with prescribed volume form, Acta Math., 219(2017), 181-211

    2017

  30. [37]

    Tosatti, B

    V. Tosatti, B. Weinkove, Hermitian metrics, ( n − 1, n− 1) forms and Monge-Amp` ere equations, J. Reine Angew. Math., 755(2019), 67-101

    2019

  31. [38]

    Tosatti, B

    V. Tosatti, B. Weinkove, The complex Monge-Amp` ere equation with a gradient term, arXiv: 1906.10034, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Tosatti, B

    V. Tosatti, B. Weinkove, The complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on compact Hermitian mani- folds, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 23(2010), 1187-1195

    2010

  33. [40]

    Yuan, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations containing gradient terms on compact Hermitian manifolds, Canad

    R. Yuan, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations containing gradient terms on compact Hermitian manifolds, Canad. J. Math., 70(2018), 943-960

    2018

  34. [41]

    Yuan, Regularity of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Hermitian manifolds

    R. Yuan, Regularity of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Hermitian manifolds. II, arXiv: 2001.09238, 2020

    2001 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Zhang, Hessian equations on closed Hermitian manifolds, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 291(2017), 485-510

    D. Zhang, Hessian equations on closed Hermitian manifolds, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 291(2017), 485-510

    2017

  36. [44]

    Zhang, A priori estimates for complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on Hermitian manifolds, Int

    X. Zhang, A priori estimates for complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on Hermitian manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not., 2010(2010), 3814-3836

    2010

  37. [45]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Regularity estimates of solutions to complex Monge-Amp` ere equations on Hermitian manifolds, J. Funct. Anal., 260(2011), 2004-2026. Institute of Mathematics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China Email address : cxj@hnu.edu.cn F aculty of Mathematics an...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.