Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Constraining eV-scale axion-like particle dark matter: insights from the M87 Galaxy

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Non-detection of an ALP decay line in M87's halo excludes axion-like particle dark matter with couplings an order of magnitude below previous limits for masses of 8 to 20 eV.

desk verdict M87 ALP decay constraints are an interesting and well-written application, but the headline order-of-magnitude improvement rests on comparing a narrow line to broadband photometry without filter convolution, which likely weakens the limits by ~10. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01860 v3 pith:TVXNW6IR submitted 2025-01-03 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Arpan Kar , Sourov Roy , Pratick Sarkar This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HE
keywords axion-likeparticlesdarkmatterALP-photoncouplingM87galaxymonochromaticdecaylineinfrared-optical-UVobservationsindirectdetectioneV-scaleALPs
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the non-detection of a narrow emission line in multi-wavelength observations of M87's core constrains axion-like particle dark matter more strongly than any previous bound for masses near 8--20 eV. It assumes ALPs make up all of the dark matter in M87's halo and that their decay to two photons produces a monochromatic line in the infrared-optical-ultraviolet range. Comparing the predicted line flux with flux measurements and upper limits from Swift-UVOT, AstroSat-UVIT, Kanata, and historical Spitzer and IUE data, the authors obtain excluded couplings down to roughly $10^{-13}\,\text{GeV}^{-1}$. If the claim is right, a slice of the eV-scale ALP parameter space that was previously open is now closed, and similar line searches in other dark-matter-rich systems become a sharper probe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the predicted monochromatic decay line, with peak flux density $S_{\rm decay} = \frac{\Gamma_a}{4\pi} \int d\theta\, 2\pi\sin\theta \int_{\rm l.o.s.} dl\, \frac{\rho_a(r(l,\theta))}{\Delta\nu(r(l,\theta))}$, where $\Delta\nu = \nu_c \sigma_d/c$ is the line width set by the DM velocity dispersion. The decay rate entering it is $\Gamma_a = g_{a\gamma\gamma}^2 m_a^3/64\pi$, so the signal scales as the square of the coupling and the cube of the mass. The DM density $\rho_a$ is taken from an NFW profile for M87, with checks against alternative profiles; the line is then compared telescope-by-telescope with infrared-optical-UV flux measurements and upper limits. This comparison is what turns 'no line seen' into an upper bound on $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$.

What would settle it

Take one mass bin, such as $m_a=9.51\,\text{eV}$, convolve the Gaussian decay line of width $\Delta\nu=\nu_c\sigma_d/c$ with the Swift-UVOT filter bandpass, and recompute the 95% C.L. upper limit on $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$; if the bound moves by more than a factor of about two, the reported order-of-magnitude improvement depends on the bandpass correction being negligible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is a set of upper limits on the ALP-photon coupling $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$ in the mass window $2\,\text{eV}\lesssim m_a\lesssim 20\,\text{eV}$, derived from the absence of the predicted ALP decay line in M87 data. For the conservative no-background approach, the authors exclude $g_{a\gamma\gamma}\gtrsim 10^{-11}$ to $10^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$; the $\chi^2$-fit analysis gives 95% C.L. limits that are strongest for $4\,\text{eV}\lesssim m_a\lesssim13\,\text{eV}$. In the range $8\,\text{eV}\lesssim m_a\lesssim 20\,\text{eV}$, these bounds are about an order of magnitude stronger than existing limits, which is the paper's headline claim. The narrow decay line is predicted by integrating the DM density along the line of sight and dividing by the velocity-dispersion width; the observed fluxes are broadband photometry, and the comparison yields the constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The whole bound rests on treating a very narrow predicted emission line as if the telescope would register its full peak strength in a much wider frequency band.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Couplings above roughly $10^{-13}$ to $10^{-11}$ GeV$^{-1}$ for ALP masses between 2 and 20 eV are excluded, assuming ALPs are all of M87's dark matter.
  • In the 8--20 eV window the new limits are about an order of magnitude stronger than previous bounds, making the eV-scale ALP parameter space substantially narrower.
  • Wide-field instruments such as Swift-UVOT, AstroSat-UVIT, and Kanata drive the tightest constraints, while HST's small field of view contributes little.
  • The result is not very sensitive to the DM halo profile: a cored Burkert profile weakens the limits by roughly a factor of 1.8, and adding a central spike changes them by less than about 1%.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to convolve the predicted line with each instrument's filter bandpass; since the filters are 50--200 times wider than the line, the quoted coupling bounds would weaken roughly by the square root of that ratio if the convolution matters.
  • The same line-search logic can be applied to other dark-matter-rich galaxies with well-measured UV-optical SEDs; the reach is set by the integrated dark-matter column along the line of sight and the telescope's angular aperture.
  • Extending the search to longer-wavelength infrared data would push the same method below the current 2 eV lower edge of the mass window.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper searches for a narrow emission line from the decay of eV-scale axion-like particle dark matter in the M87 halo, using IR-optical-UV photometric data from the 2018 EHT multi-wavelength campaign (Swift-UVOT, AstroSat-UVIT, Kanata, HST) and historical data (Spitzer, IUE). It derives 95% C.L. upper limits on the ALP-photon coupling gaγγ for 2 eV ≲ ma ≲ 20 eV via a conservative 'signal does not exceed observed flux' method and via χ² fits with two background models. The headline claim is that the new bounds are stronger than existing ones by an order of magnitude in the 8–20 eV range. Appendices discuss DM profile dependence and systematic uncertainties.

Significance. If the analysis were correct as presented, the derived exclusion down to gaγγ ~ 10^-13 GeV^-1 would be a noteworthy improvement over existing bounds and a useful demonstration of using galaxy-halo photometry to constrain ALP dark matter. The paper's strengths are its use of the publicly available MWL2018 dataset, the inclusion of multiple DM halo profiles, and the explicit discussion of systematics. However, the central comparison between the predicted narrow line and broadband photometric fluxes is made without filter convolution, which directly affects the headline constraints; the claimed significance therefore cannot be assessed until that comparison is redone.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (2.3), Table 1] The paper compares the peak flux density of a narrow ALP line, with width Δν/ν ≈ σ_d/c ≈ 10^-3, directly to broadband photometric flux densities from Swift-UVOT, AstroSat-UVIT, Kanata, and HST. Those instruments measure flux averaged over a filter bandpass with Δν_filter/ν ≈ 0.2–0.35, so the observed flux density from a narrow unresolved line is diluted by a factor of roughly 100–350 relative to the line peak. Since the signal scales as gaγγ^2, the derived upper limits on gaγγ are too strong by a factor of about 10–18. This directly affects the Swift-UVOT points at 1.15×10^15, 1.33×10^15, and 1.55×10^15 Hz and the AstroSat-UVIT point at 1.95×10^15 Hz, which are exactly the points driving the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement in the 8–20 eV range. The comparison must be redone using S_obs = ∫ S_line(ν) R(ν) dν / ∫ R(ν) dν (or an equivalent convolution), which will substantially weaken the headline constraints.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.1), Table 2] The same omission enters the χ² analysis: S_signal is the line-center flux density added to the background, while S_obs is a broadband flux. Therefore the 95% C.L. limits in Table 2 and Fig. 3, e.g., gaγγ = 1.07×10^-12 GeV^-1 at ma = 9.51 eV, are also too strong by the same dilution factor. A full convolution of the Gaussian line with each instrument's filter transmission is required before these numbers can be compared with existing bounds, including for the HST data point.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.2] The polynomial background is fitted to the same seven IR-optical-UV data points that are subsequently used to constrain an ALP signal, so any ALP line present at one of the fitted frequencies is partially absorbed by the polynomial parameters. This makes the constraints from the fitted-background method (Fig. 4) stronger than statistically justified. The paper should either perform a simultaneous fit of background and signal or use a cross-validation / leave-one-out procedure to assess the impact of this circularity.
  4. [Eq. (2.3) vs. Table 1] Eq. (2.3) defines S_decay as the radiated power per unit area per unit frequency, i.e., F_ν, while Table 1 and Fig. 1 report νSν. In Eq. (4.1), S_obs is used without stating whether it is F_ν or νF_ν. If S_obs is the tabulated νSν, then the ALP signal must be multiplied by the central frequency ν_c before comparison; if S_obs is intended to be F_ν, the tabulated values must be divided by the pivot frequency. Without this correction, the limits change by an order of magnitude in frequency, which is comparable to the claimed improvement, so the dimensional consistency of the comparison must be clarified and fixed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The telescope name is written inconsistently as 'Astrosat' (Abstract, Conclusion) and 'AstroSat-UVIT' (Table 1); please standardize the spelling.
  2. [Sec. 4.1] The text states that the observed fluxes are used as upper limits, but the table lists νSν values; please specify explicitly how the conversion from νSν to the quantity used in Eq. (4.1) is performed.
  3. [Fig. 2] The red band is said to demonstrate the observational uncertainty in the data, but no details are given for how the band was computed; a sentence in the text describing the propagation of the quoted 1σ errors would be helpful.
  4. [Sec. 2] The velocity dispersion near the SMBH is written as sqrt(2 G_N M_BH / r); since the line-of-sight integral samples a range of r, the paper should state how the position-dependent σ_d is evaluated in Eq. (2.3).
  5. [Sec. 4.2.2] The number of fitted data points (seven) and the resulting number of degrees of freedom should be stated explicitly in the main text, not only via the quoted χ²/d.o.f. value.
  6. [Reference [84]] Reference [84] is given only as a GitHub URL; consider citing the associated paper or documentation for the AxionLimits data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the g_aγγ bounds follow from standard ALP decay physics applied to external M87 data and an external background model; self-citations are peripheral and no fitted quantity is presented as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs. The ALP decay signal (Eq. 2.3) is computed from the standard effective Lagrangian (Eq. 2.1, cited to external refs [30, 38] in addition to self-ref [67]), the standard decay rate (Eq. 2.2), and externally published M87 halo parameters (NFW from [71] with an alternative from [72], Burkert from [73]); no parameter is fitted in the paper to the target quantity g_aγγ. The observational data are external (MWL2018 campaign [56], historical [57-66]), and the χ² background (modified Model A) is taken from the external MWL2018 paper, with χ²_min corresponding to the best-fit background without signal. The conservative approach (Sec. 4.1) requires the computed signal not to exceed the observed flux at each frequency: S_decay(m_a, g) ≤ S_obs, a direct non-circular comparison; the headline order-of-magnitude claim at 8-20 eV is driven by this comparison plus the standard-background χ² result, not by any fit to the target. The self-citations ([22, 23, 53, 67]) are contextual (ALP origins, M87* motivation, standard Lagrangian) and are not load-bearing, since the same statements are independently cited or are standard physics. Section 4.2.2 fits a fourth-order polynomial to the same seven IR-Opt-UV data points and then uses it as the background for the χ² constraint; this is a mildly self-referential background choice, but the resulting limit is controlled by the fit residuals (quoted χ²/d.o.f = 0.98) and could have been weak if the residuals were large, so it is not definitionally forced, and the paper presents it as a secondary cross-check giving only 'slightly stronger constraints at the lower end of the mass range' rather than as the source of the headline improvement. Appendix C honestly lists systematic limitations (background models, detector calibration, DM profile dependence), and none of these amount to an input that is renamed as a prediction. The reader's 'weakest assumption' (comparing the narrow ALP line peak to broadband photometric flux densities without filter convolution) is a potential correctness issue that could invalidate the numerical limits, but even if correct it is a modeling error, not circularity, because the bound is not equivalent to any fitted input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central analysis rests on standard ALP physics and an assumed dark matter distribution in M87. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The main free choices are the halo model, the assumed velocity dispersion, and the fitted polynomial background in the secondary analysis. The most fragile input is the implicit assumption about spectral resolution, which is not stated as an assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • Polynomial background coefficients a0-a4 = -2.05e-10, 9.92e-10, -1.605e-9, 1.08e-9, -2.56e-10 erg cm^-2 s^-1
    Fitted in Section 4.2.2 to 7 IR-optical-UV data points and used as a background model for the secondary chi-square constraints; the polynomial order is chosen ad hoc to minimize chi-square per degree of freedom.
  • DM velocity dispersion sigma_d = 10^-3 c (assumed)
    Used in Eq 2.3 to set the ALP line width; the paper takes an outer halo value of order 10^-3 c without deriving it from M87 dynamics. The line width directly controls the peak flux density and thus the derived limits.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ALPs constitute all of the dark matter in the M87 halo
    The entire analysis assumes the DM density is equal to the assumed halo density and that ALPs are 100% of the dark matter. This enters in Section 2 when computing the decay signal.
  • domain assumption NFW halo profile with rho0=6.96e5 M_sun/kpc^3 and r0=403.8 kpc from HAWC [71]
    Adopted in Section 2; governs the DM column and thus the signal flux. The paper checks alternative profiles in Appendix B but uses this profile for the main results.
  • domain assumption The line width equals nu_c sigma_d/c with sigma_d ~ 10^-3 c
    Used in Eq 2.3 to convert the decay flux into a peak flux density. The velocity dispersion of the M87 halo is not directly measured in this paper.
  • domain assumption The modified Model A background from [56] is a valid description of the M87 SED
    Used in the chi-square analysis of Section 4.2.1; its parameters are fixed to the [56] best fit and treated as known, without propagating their uncertainties.
  • ad hoc to paper Broadband photometric flux densities can be compared directly to the narrow ALP line peak without filter convolution
    The paper does not convolve the predicted line with the telescope filter bandpass before comparing to the observed flux densities. This is the key unstated assumption that affects the reported sensitivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining eV-scale axion-like particle dark matter: insights from the M87 Galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TVXNW6IR

@misc{pith2026250101860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining eV-scale axion-like particle dark matter: insights from the M87 Galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TVXNW6IR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01860}
}
abstract

Axion-like particles (ALPs) can account for the observed dark matter (DM) of the Universe and if their masses are at the eV scale, they can decay into infrared, optical and ultraviolet photons with a decay lifetime larger than the age of the Universe.We analyze multi-wavelength data obtained from the central region of Messier 87 (M87) galaxy by several telescopes, such as, Swift, Astrosat, Kanata, Spitzer and International Ultraviolet Explorer in the infrared to ultraviolet frequencies ($\sim 2\times10^{14} \, {\rm Hz} - 3\times10^{15}$ Hz), to constrain the narrow emission lines indicative of the eV scale ALP DM decay. We derive constraints on the ALP coupling to two photons ($g_{a\gamma\gamma}$) for ALP mass range $2 \, {\rm eV} \lesssim m_a \lesssim 20 \, {\rm eV}$, assuming ALPs form the DM in the M87 halo. We find that our bounds on ALP-two-photon coupling can become stronger than the existing ones by an order of magnitude in the ALP mass range $8 \, {\rm eV} \lesssim m_a \lesssim 20 \, {\rm eV}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constraints on High-Frequency Gravitational Waves from Graviton-Photon Conversion in the M87 Galaxy

    hep-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Graviton–photon conversion in M87's magnetic field sets h_c and Ωgw h² limits 1–5 orders of magnitude tighter than Milky Way-based bounds across 10^10–10^27 Hz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440

    1977

  3. [3]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791

    1977

  4. [4]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223

    1978

  5. [5]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279

    1978

  6. [6]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? , Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493

    1980

  7. [7]

    Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian) , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  8. [8]

    Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys

    J.E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    1979

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199

    1981

  2. [10]

    Pendlebury et al., Revised experimental upper limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys

    J.M. Pendlebury et al., Revised experimental upper limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 092003 [ 1509.04411]. – 14 –

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  4. [12]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    1983

  5. [13]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137

    1983

  6. [14]

    Khlopov, A

    M. Khlopov, A. Sakharov and D. Sokoloff, The nonlinear modulation of the density distribution in standard axionic cdm and its cosmological impact , Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 72 (1999) 105

    1999

  7. [15]

    Duffy and K

    L.D. Duffy and K. van Bibber, Axions as Dark Matter Particles , New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105008 [0904.3346]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Hui, J.P

    L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043541 [ 1610.08297]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chadha-Day, J

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Ellis and D.J.E. Marsh, Axion dark matter: What is it and why now? , Sci. Adv. 8 (2022) abj3618 [ 2105.01406]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Adams et al., Axion Dark Matter , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022 [ 2203.14923]

    C.B. Adams et al., Axion Dark Matter , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022 [ 2203.14923]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan, Dark Matter , 2406.01705

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions In String Theory , JHEP 06 (2006) 051 [ hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 123530 [ 0905.4720]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Maity, S

    D. Maity, S. Roy and S. SenGupta, Constraining the Randall-Sundrum modulus in the light of recent PVLAS data, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015010 [ 0709.3940]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Haque, S

    S. Haque, S. Roy and S. SenGupta, Translating current ALP photon coupling strength bounds to the Randall-Sundrum model , 2411.08396

  16. [24]

    Roach, S

    B.M. Roach, S. Rossland, K.C.Y. Ng, K. Perez, J.F. Beacom, B.W. Grefenstette et al., Long-exposure NuSTAR constraints on decaying dark matter in the Galactic halo , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 023009 [ 2207.04572]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bernal, A

    J.L. Bernal, A. Caputo, G. Sato-Polito, J. Mirocha and M. Kamionkowski, Seeking dark matter with γ-ray attenuation, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103046 [ 2208.13794]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bessho, Y

    T. Bessho, Y. Ikeda and W. Yin, Indirect detection of eV dark matter via infrared spectroscopy , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 095025 [ 2208.05975]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. Roy, C. Blanco, C. Dessert, A. Prabhu and T. Temim, Sensitivity of JWST to eV-Scale Decaying Axion Dark Matter , 2311.04987

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dekker, E

    A. Dekker, E. Peerbooms, F. Zimmer, K.C.Y. Ng and S. Ando, Searches for sterile neutrinos and axionlike particles from the galactic halo with erosita , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Wang et al., Spectroscopic search for optical emission lines from dark matter decay , Phys

    H. Wang et al., Spectroscopic search for optical emission lines from dark matter decay , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103007 [ 2311.05476]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Lucente and E. Vitagliano, Probing the blue axion with cosmic optical background anisotropies, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 083032 [ 2301.06560]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Porras-Bedmar, M

    S. Porras-Bedmar, M. Meyer and D. Horns, Novel bounds on decaying axionlike particle dark matter from the cosmic background , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103501 [ 2407.10618]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. Grin, G. Covone, J.-P. Kneib, M. Kamionkowski, A. Blain and E. Jullo, A Telescope Search for Decaying Relic Axions , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 105018 [ astro-ph/0611502]. – 15 –

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Regis, M

    M. Regis, M. Taoso, D. Vaz, J. Brinchmann, S.L. Zoutendijk, N.F. Bouch´ e et al., Searching for light in the darkness: Bounds on ALP dark matter with the optical MUSE-faint survey , Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136075 [ 2009.01310]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. Vittino, N. Fornengo, M. Regis and M. Taoso, Searching for axion-like particle decay in the near-infrared background: an updated analysis , JCAP 05 (2021) 046 [ 2012.09179]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Wadekar and Z

    D. Wadekar and Z. Wang, Strong constraints on decay and annihilation of dark matter from heating of gas-rich dwarf galaxies , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 075007 [ 2111.08025]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nakayama and W

    K. Nakayama and W. Yin, Anisotropic cosmic optical background bound for decaying dark matter in light of the LORRI anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103505 [ 2205.01079]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Todarello, M

    E. Todarello, M. Regis, J. Reynoso-Cordova, M. Taoso, D. Vaz, J. Brinchmann et al., Robust bounds on ALP dark matter from dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the optical MUSE-Faint survey , JCAP 05 (2024) 043 [ 2307.07403]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Janish and E

    R. Janish and E. Pinetti, Hunting Dark Matter Lines in the Infrared Background with the James Webb Space Telescope, 2310.15395

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED , 2402.07976

    W. Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED , 2402.07976

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Regis, M

    M. Regis, M. Taoso and J.T. Calvo, Searching for axion-like particles with SPHEREx , 2412.12286

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Todarello and M

    E. Todarello and M. Regis, Bounds on axions-like particles shining in the ultra-violet , 2412.02543

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    McLean, S.K

    I.S. McLean, S.K. Ramsay and H. Takami, eds., Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV , vol. 8446 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Sept., 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    Tandon, J.B

    S.N. Tandon, J.B. Hutchings, S.K. Ghosh, A. Subramaniam, G. Koshy, V. Girish et al., In-orbit performance of uvit and first results , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Ghosh, P

    S.K. Ghosh, P. Joseph, A. Kumar, J. Postma, C.S. Stalin, A. Subramaniam et al., In-orbit performance of UVIT over the past 5 years , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 42 (2021) 20 [2012.13525]

    2021

  37. [45]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L2 [ 1906.11239]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L3 [ 1906.11240]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L4 [ 1906.11241]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L5 [ 1906.11242]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L6 [1906.11243]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Akiyama et al., First m87 event horizon telescope results

    K. Akiyama et al., First m87 event horizon telescope results. vii. polarization of the ring , The Astrophysical Journal Letters 910 (2021) L12

    2021

  43. [51]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon , Astrophys. J. Lett. 910 (2021) L13 [2105.01173]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Nomura, K

    K. Nomura, K. Saito and J. Soda, Observing axions through photon ring dimming of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 123505 [ 2212.03020]. – 16 –

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. Roy, P. Sarkar, S. Sau and S. SenGupta, Exploring axions through the photon ring of a spherically symmetric black hole , JCAP 11 (2023) 099 [ 2310.05908]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan and Y. Zhao, Probing Axions with Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetric Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 061102 [ 1905.02213]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Event Horizon Telescope, Fermi-LAT, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS, EA VN collaboration, Broadband Multi-wavelength Properties of M87 during the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope Campaign, Astrophys. J. Lett. 911 (2021) L11 [ 2104.06855]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Event Horizon Telescope - Multi-wavelength science working group, Event Horizon Telescope, Fermi Large Area Telescope, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS, EA VN, Event Horizon Telescope Multi-wavelength Sciencecollaboration, Broadband Multi-wavelength Properties of M87 during the 2018 E...

    2024

  49. [57]

    Perola and M

    G.C. Perola and M. Tarenghi, IUE spectra of the jet and the nucleus of M 87. , The Astrophysics Journal 240 (1980) 447

    1980

  50. [58]

    Biretta, C.P

    J.A. Biretta, C.P. Stern and D.E. Harris, The Radio to X-ray Spectrum of the M87 Jet and Nucleus, The Astronomical Journal 101 (1991) 1632

    1991

  51. [59]

    Despringre, D

    V. Despringre, D. Fraix-Burnet and E. Davoust, First millimeter mapping of the jet and nucleus of M 87. , Astronomy and Astrophysics 309 (1996) 375

    1996

  52. [60]

    Biretta, W.B

    J.A. Biretta, W.B. Sparks and F. Macchetto, Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Superluminal Motion in the M87 Jet , The Astrophysics Journal 520 (1999) 621

    1999

  53. [61]

    Marshall, B.P

    H.L. Marshall, B.P. Miller, D.S. Davis, E.S. Perlman, M.W. Wise, C.R. Canizares et al., A High resolution x-ray image of the jet in M87 , Astrophys. J. 564 (2002) 683 [ astro-ph/0109160]

    2002 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Perlman, D.E

    E.S. Perlman, D.E. Harris, J.A. Biretta, W.B. Sparks and F.D. Macchetto, Month-timescale optical variability in the m87 jet , The Astrophysical Journal 599 (2003) L65

    2003

  55. [63]

    Beuther, E.B

    H. Beuther, E.B. Churchwell and C.F. McKee, The formation of massive stars , in Protostars and Planets V , 2, 2006 [ astro-ph/0602012]

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Shi, G.H

    Y. Shi, G.H. Rieke, D.C. Hines, K.D. Gordon and E. Egami, Thermal and non-thermal infrared emission from M87 , Astrophys. J. 655 (2007) 781 [ astro-ph/0610494]

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J.C. Tan, H. Beuther and F. Walter, A Search for Molecular Gas in the Nucleus of M87 and Implications for the Fueling of Supermassive Black Holes , Astrophys. J. 689 (2008) 775 [astro-ph/0610488]

    2008 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Perlman, R.E

    E.S. Perlman, R.E. Mason, C. Packham, N.A. Levenson, M. Elitzur, J.J. Schaefer et al., The Mid-Infrared Emission of M87 , Astrophys. J. 663 (2007) 808 [ 0704.1156]

    2007 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A. Kar, T. Kumar, S. Roy and J. Zupan, Searching for relativistic axions in the sky , JCAP 08 (2023) 056 [ 2212.04647]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Caputo, M

    A. Caputo, M. Regis, M. Taoso and S.J. Witte, Detecting the Stimulated Decay of Axions at RadioFrequencies, JCAP 03 (2019) 027 [ 1811.08436]

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Edwards, M

    T.D.P. Edwards, M. Chianese, B.J. Kavanagh, S.M. Nissanke and C. Weniger, Unique Multimessenger Signal of QCD Axion Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 161101 [1905.04686]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The Structure of cold dark matter halos , Astrophys. J. 462 (1996) 563 [ astro-ph/9508025]

    1996 arXiv

  63. [71]

    HA WCcollaboration, Search for decaying dark matter in the Virgo cluster of galaxies with HA WC, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043034 [ 2309.03973]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lacroix, C

    T. Lacroix, C. Bœhm and J. Silk, Ruling out thermal dark matter with a black hole induced spiky profile in the M87 galaxy , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 043510 [ 1505.00785]. – 17 –

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    De Laurentis and P

    M. De Laurentis and P. Salucci, The Accurate Mass Distribution of M87, the Giant Galaxy with Imaged Shadow of Its Supermassive Black Hole, as a Portal to New Physics , Astrophys. J. 929 (2022) 17 [ 2206.01997]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1719 [ astro-ph/9906391]

    1999 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Balaji, D

    S. Balaji, D. Sachdeva, F. Sala and J. Silk, Dark matter spikes around Sgr A* in γ-rays, JCAP 08 (2023) 063 [ 2303.12107]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Phoroutan-Mehr and H.-B

    M. Phoroutan-Mehr and H.-B. Yu, Relaxing Constraints on Dark Matter Annihilation Near the Supermassive Black Hole in M87 , 2411.18751

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    https://eventhorizontelescope.org/for-astronomers/data

  70. [78]

    Lister, H.D

    M.L. Lister, H.D. Aller, M.F. Aller, M.H. Cohen, D.C. Homan, M. Kadler et al., MOJA VE: Monitoring of Jets in Active Galactic Nuclei with VLBA Experiments. V. Multi-Epoch VLBA Images, The Astronomical Journal 137 (2009) 3718 [ 0812.3947]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Harris, C.C

    D.E. Harris, C.C. Cheung, L. Stawarz, J.A. Biretta and E.S. Perlman, Variability Timescales in the M87 Jet: Signatures of E 2 Losses, Discovery of a Quasi Period in HST-1, and the Site of TeV Flaring , The AstrophysicsbJournal 699 (2009) 305 [ 0904.3925]

    2009 arXiv

  72. [80]

    et al, Fermi Large Area Telescope Gamma-Ray Detection of the Radio Galaxy M87 , The Astrophysics Journal 707 (2009) 55 [ 0910.3565]

    A. et al, Fermi Large Area Telescope Gamma-Ray Detection of the Radio Galaxy M87 , The Astrophysics Journal 707 (2009) 55 [ 0910.3565]

    2009 arXiv

  73. [81]

    collaboration, Discovery of very high energy gamma-rays associated with an x-ray binary, Science 309 (2005) 746 [ astro-ph/0508298]

    H.E.S.S. collaboration, Discovery of very high energy gamma-rays associated with an x-ray binary, Science 309 (2005) 746 [ astro-ph/0508298]

    2005 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Acciari et al., Observation of gamma-ray emission from the galaxy M87 above 250 GeV with VERITAS, Astrophys

    V.A. Acciari et al., Observation of gamma-ray emission from the galaxy M87 above 250 GeV with VERITAS, Astrophys. J. 679 (2008) 397 [ 0802.1951]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Astrophys

    MAGIC collaboration, A lower bound on intergalactic magnetic fields from time variability of 1ES 0229+200 from MAGIC and Fermi/LAT observations , Astron. Astrophys. 670 (2023) A145 [2210.03321]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    C. O’Hare. https://github.com/cajohare/AxionLimits

  77. [85]

    https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/luvoir/

  78. [86]

    Kulkarni et al., Science with the Ultraviolet Explorer (UVEX) , 2111.15608

    S.R. Kulkarni et al., Science with the Ultraviolet Explorer (UVEX) , 2111.15608

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Fermi-LAT collaboration, The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter, Astrophys. J. 840 (2017) 43 [ 1704.03910]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Poole et al., Photometric Calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope , Mon

    T.S. Poole et al., Photometric Calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 383 (2008) 627 [ 0708.2259]

    2008 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Breeveld, W

    A.A. Breeveld, W. Landsman, S.T. Holland, P. Roming, N.P.M. Kuin and M.J. Page, An Updated Ultraviolet Calibration for the Swift/UVOT , AIP Conf. Proc. 1358 (2011) 373 [1102.4717]

    2011 arXiv

  82. [90]

    H. Zhou, S. Covino, Z.-P. Jin, Y.-Z. Fan, D.-M. Wei and N.P. Kuin, Extracting Cleaned Swift/UVOT Ultraviolet Grism Spectra with the uvotpy Package , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 277 (2025) 27 [ 2502.10241]

    2025 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Tandon, J

    S.N. Tandon, J. Postma, P. Joseph, A. Devaraj, A. Subramaniam, I.V. Barve et al., Additional Calibration of the Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope on Board AstroSat , The Astrophysics Journal 159 (2020) 158 [ 2002.01159]

    2020 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Ikejiri et al., Photopolarimetric Monitoring of Blazars in the Optical and Near-Infrared Bands with the Kanata Telescope: I

    Y. Ikejiri et al., Photopolarimetric Monitoring of Blazars in the Optical and Near-Infrared Bands with the Kanata Telescope: I. Correlations between Flux, Color, and Polarization , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 63 (2011) 639 [ 1105.0255]. – 18 –

    2011 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Sasada et al., Multi-Wavelength Photometric and Polarimetric Observations of the Outburst of 3C 454.3 in Dec

    M. Sasada et al., Multi-Wavelength Photometric and Polarimetric Observations of the Outburst of 3C 454.3 in Dec. 2009 , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 64 (2012) 58 [ 1112.4583]

    2012 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Itoh et al., A Study of the Long-term Spectral Variations of 3C 66A Observed with the Fermi and Kanata Telescopes, Publ

    R. Itoh et al., A Study of the Long-term Spectral Variations of 3C 66A Observed with the Fermi and Kanata Telescopes, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 65 (2013) 18 [ 1301.2664]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Bohlin, K.D

    R.C. Bohlin, K.D. Gordon and P.E. Tremblay, Techniques and Review of Absolute Flux Calibration from the Ultraviolet to the Mid-Infrared , Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 126 (2016) 711 [1406.1707]

    2016 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Spitzer Science Center, Spitzer irac instrument handbook , 2024

    2024

  89. [97]

    Massa and E.L

    D. Massa and E.L. Fitzpatrick, A recalibration of iue newsips low dispersion data , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 126 (2000) 517 [ astro-ph/9812152]

    2000 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Bohlin and L

    R.C. Bohlin and L. Bianchi, A Correction for IUE UV Flux Distributions from Comparisons with CALSPEC , The Astrophysics Journal 155 (2018) 162 [ 1802.03419]. – 19 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.