Enabling Strong Neutrino Self-interaction with an Unparticle Mediator

Kevin J. Kelly; Mudit Rai; Saeid Foroughi-Abari; Yue Zhang

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Enabling Strong Neutrino Self-interaction with an Unparticle Mediator

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A continuum 'unparticle' mediator can mediate strong neutrino self-interactions while evading the early-universe and IceCube bounds.

desk verdict Smart, careful phenomenology that opens a new direction for strong neutrino self-interactions, but the central result rests on an unparticle spectral ansatz that a UV completion may not support. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02049 v1 pith:HUMSHYEJ submitted 2025-01-03 hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ex

Saeid Foroughi-Abari , Kevin J. Kelly , Mudit Rai , Yue Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ex

keywords neutrinoself-interactionsunparticlegappedcontinuummediatorDeltaN_effIceCubecosmogenicneutrinosKallen-LehmannspectraldensitybeyondStandardModel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the strong neutrino self-interactions favored by some cosmic-microwave-background and large-scale-structure analyses can be mediated by a 'gapped unparticle': a hidden-sector state whose mass is spread over a continuous interval rather than fixed at one value. It shows that two of the leading constraints on such interactions are both weakened when the mediator is a continuum. The early-universe bound on the effective number of extra neutrino species, $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$, is suppressed even for sub-MeV mass gaps because only the low-mass tail of the continuum is thermally populated. The IceCube bound from ultra-high-energy cosmogenic neutrinos is also weakened because scattering through a continuum is less resonant than scattering through a single particle. The paper concludes that an unparticle mediator with scaling dimension $d_u\gtrsim1.1$ reopens ample parameter space for $G_{\rm eff}\sim(10\text{--}100\,\mathrm{MeV})^{-2}$ self-interactions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gapped unparticle's Källén–Lehmann spectral density, $\rho_{KL}(m^2)=A_{d_u}(m^2-\mu_{\rm IR}^2)^{d_u-2}\,\Theta(m^2-\mu_{\rm IR}^2)$ (Eq. (2)), normalized so that the integrated spectral weight equals one particle's worth, $\int \rho_{KL}\,dm^2/(2\pi)=\Lambda^{2(d_u-1)}$ (Eq. (4)). This continuum replaces the $\delta$-function of an ordinary mediator: the Feynman propagator becomes $(q^2-\mu_{\rm IR}^2)^{d_u-2}$, the $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ integral is dominated by Boltzmann-suppressed high-mass states, yielding the $(T_{\rm BBN}/\Lambda)^{2d_u-2}$ suppression, and the scattering amplitude's pole is broadened because the absorptive self-energy $\mathrm{Im}\Sigma$ enters the denominator. The ratio $\mu_{\rm IR}/\Lambda$ controls both $G_{\rm eff}$ and the suppression.

What would settle it

Compute the spectral function of a concrete gapped conformal field theory and check whether it equals Eq. (2); observationally, a measurement by a CMB-S4-class experiment of $\Delta N_{\rm eff}>0.3$ for parameters in the paper's open region, or an IceCube-Gen2 observation of no off-resonance UHE-neutrino depletion where the model predicts a universal deficit, would falsify the scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the gapped-unparticle model of Eq. (1) yields an effective neutrino self-interaction strength $G_{\rm eff}\simeq |B_{d_u}\lambda^2|\,\mu_{\rm IR}^{-1}\,(\mu_{\rm IR}/\Lambda)^{2d_u-2}$ (Eq. (7)), while the contribution to $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ is $\simeq [1920\,d_u(2d_u+1)\zeta(2d_u+2)/(7(2\pi)^{2d_u+2})]\,g\,(T_{\rm BBN}/\Lambda)^{2d_u-2}$ (Eq. (9)), independent of the gap $\mu_{\rm IR}$ in the regime $\mu_{\rm IR}\ll T_{\rm BBN}\ll\mu_{\rm UV}$. The paper further writes the $\nu\nu\to\nu\nu$ cross section with an unparticle propagator whose s-channel term behaves as $(s-\mu_{\rm IR}^2)^{-(4-2d_u)}$, so the sharp Breit-Wigner resonance of a particle mediator is smoothed out. It then fits the resulting ultra-high-energy neutrino fluxes to the IceCube 7.5-year HESE data with an MCMC scan over astrophysical and neutrino-mass parameters, finding that the excluded region shrinks as $d_u$ rises from 1.1 to 1.3. The central discovery is that a continuum mediator evades both the BBN/CMB and IceCube constraints while retaining $G_{\rm eff}$ in the cosmologically interesting range.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the hidden sector's mass distribution has exactly the smooth power-law form $\rho_{KL}(m^2)\propto(m^2-\mu_{\rm IR}^2)^{d_u-2}$ with one particle's worth of weight; if a real conformal sector instead has a sharp resonance, a different threshold exponent, or extra spectral structure, the $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ and IceCube relief calculated here would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A sub-MeV mass gap $\mu_{\rm IR}$ is no longer excluded by $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ for $d_u\gtrsim1.1$, unlike the 2.0–3.1 MeV lower bound for real and complex scalar mediators.
The IceCube exclusion of $\nu_\tau$-philic mediators below roughly 40 MeV is lifted, and the remaining allowed region still hosts $G_{\rm eff}\sim(10\text{--}100\,\mathrm{MeV})^{-2}$.
The cosmological target region preferred by CMB and matter-power-spectrum analyses remains open, giving upcoming surveys a concrete continuum-mediator benchmark.
The invisible-$Z$-width constraint continues to bound the coupling $\lambda$ from above, but it does not close the low-$\mu_{\rm IR}$ window of interest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extension: if a realistic gapped conformal sector has a sharp delta-function component or a different threshold exponent, the relief from $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ and IceCube would shrink; the paper does not derive Eq. (2) from a UV completion.
Extension: the broadband suppression mechanism is not specific to neutrinos, so the same $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ relief should open parameter space for other unparticle-mediated dark-sector portals.
Extension: rerunning the transport analysis with flavor-specific self-interactions or alternative neutrino mass orderings would sharpen the projected reach of IceCube-Gen2.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague,

Read the unparticle-mediated neutrino self-interaction paper. The core idea is new: replace the scalar mediator with a continuum of states (a gapped unparticle), and the two leading constraints, Delta N_eff and IceCube, both weaken. The paper shows this explicitly. In the particle limit du -> 1, the formulas reduce to known results, which is reassuring. The IceCube analysis uses the public nuSIprop code and a proper MCMC with astrophysical nuisance parameters, so the exclusion regions in Fig. 1 are made with the right toolkit.

The two physical effects are clean. The broadband point is that at BBN temperature only modes with m <~ T are populated; for a continuous spectrum, that fraction is suppressed by (T_BBN/Lambda)^{2du-2}. That is a simple and robust argument for any smooth continuum. The IceCube point is that the s-channel resonance is softened because the propagator is a power law rather than a Breit-Wigner. That is also transparent.

The soft spot is the input, not the algebra. The spectral density in Eq. (2) is a pure power law above the gap, with one-particle normalization Eq. (4). The paper does not derive this from a UV completion. The stress-test raised a fair point: a gapped conformal sector often has a discrete state at the gap or a threshold exponent set by phase space, not a free parameter. If a delta-function piece sits at the gap, the UHE neutrino scattering becomes resonant again and the IceCube rescue disappears. If the threshold is steeper, the Delta N_eff suppression is diluted. The paper's closing hedge covers smooth continuous spectra, but not the discrete-component case. That is a genuine model-dependence caveat, not an internal inconsistency. The authors present this as a phenomenological example and are clear about it, so it does not invalidate the work, but it should be discussed more prominently.

There are a couple of smaller issues. The Fig. 1 caption says M = 500 TeV while the top-left panel labels M = 500 GeV. That inconsistency should be fixed. The code is not released, which makes the IceCube constraint harder to reproduce, though the method is documented.

Overall, this is a solid, honest phenomenological study. It does not settle the cosmological hints, but it offers a concrete benchmark for IceCube-Gen2, FCC-ee, and CMB-S4. I would send it to peer review, and I would ask the referee to push the authors on the spectral density assumptions and the M benchmark.

Best, [Name]

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that strong neutrino self-interactions can be mediated by a gapped unparticle, a scalar with a continuous Källén–Lehmann spectral density rather than a single mass pole. The authors identify two effects that relax the two leading constraints on light neutrinophilic mediators: (i) the broadband nature of the unparticle suppresses its contribution to ΔNeff during BBN even for sub-MeV mass gaps, because only the low-mass part of the continuum is thermally populated; and (ii) the s-channel resonance in UHE–CνB scattering is softened, weakening the IceCube cosmogenic-neutrino constraint. They compute the effective neutrino self-coupling, the ΔNeff contribution, the scattering cross sections, and the invisible Z-width constraint, and they use a modified version of the public nuSIprop code with an MCMC scan to map the allowed parameter space. For du > 1.1 they find that a large region with Geff ~ (10–100 MeV)^{-2} survives, opening up parameter space for cosmologically interesting neutrino self-interactions.

Significance. If the gapped-unparticle spectral ansatz is accepted, the paper gives a clear, internally consistent demonstration that a continuum mediator can evade two constraints that severely restrict simple particle mediators. The analytic results in the main text and appendices are useful, the du → 1 limit correctly recovers the particle-mediator results, and the use of the public nuSIprop code with explicit generalized cross-section formulas is a strength. The paper is of interest to the self-interacting neutrino community and provides concrete targets for IceCube-Gen2, FCC-ee, and CMB-S4. The main caveat is that the central conclusions are contingent on the assumed form of the spectral density and its normalization, which are not derived from a UV-complete construction.

major comments (2)

[Gapped unparticle mediator, Eqs. (2), (4), (9), (10), Fig. 1] The two effects that carry the paper's conclusions are direct consequences of the assumed pure power-law Källén–Lehmann ansatz in Eq. (2), with no discrete component, together with the one-particle normalization in Eq. (4). The manuscript does not derive this spectral shape from a UV-complete gapped conformal sector. In standard mechanisms that generate a mass gap in a conformal theory (confinement, a relevant deformation, or a hard-wall AdS model), the spectral function of the scalar operator generically contains a discrete low-lying mode in addition to a continuum, and the continuum threshold exponent is fixed by phase space rather than by a free parameter du. If a δ-function component is present at µIR, UHE–CνB scattering retains a sharp Breit–Wigner resonance and the IceCube constraint in Fig. 1 is not weakened; if the continuum threshold exponent is larger than assumed, the suppression factor in Eq. (9) is diluted. A concrete check would be to compute ρKL(m²) in a simple UV completion (for example, a deformed CFT or a hard-wall extra-dimensional model) and recompute the three exclusion regions in Fig. 1, or to state explicitly the conditions under which a pure continuum with no pole is guaranteed. As it stands, the 'ample parameter space' statement is a property of the assumed spectral ansatz rather than a robust prediction of gapped unparticle sectors in general.
[Fig. 1 and Appendix D] The comparison of the Z-width constraint is not presented on a fully consistent footing. The top-left panel of Fig. 1 is labeled 'Z decay (M = 500 GeV)' while the caption fixes M = 500 TeV for all panels, and the unparticle panels use the same Z-width calculation with an integration over the spectral density. Because the bound on λ depends logarithmically on M (Eq. (36) and Fig. 7), the reader cannot tell whether the change in the purple region between the particle and unparticle panels is a physical effect of the continuum mediator or a consequence of choosing different UV mass scales. The authors should state the value of M used for each panel and verify that the comparison is apples-to-apples.

minor comments (3)

[Eq. (4)] The text says the spectral function is required to 'normalize to unity', but the integral is set equal to Λ^{2(du−1)}, which is not dimensionless for du ≠ 1. The wording should be clarified to 'normalized to one particle's worth of spectral weight' as used later in the text.
[Fig. 2 and Eq. (9)] The value of g (real vs complex unparticle) used in the ΔNeff curves and in the parameter scans is not stated. Since Eq. (9) scales linearly with g, the excluded regions depend on this choice; please specify g for each figure.
[Outlook] The closing statement that 'qualitatively similar results hold' for any continuous smooth spectral density is broader than what the calculations demonstrate; the suppression in Eq. (9) depends on the high-mass scaling of the spectral weight and on the absence of a discrete pole. A sentence qualifying the generalization would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the unparticle effects are derived from the stated spectral-density ansatz and checked against external constraints; no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The model inputs are the gapped unparticle spectral density (Eq. (2)), Georgi's A_du (Eq. (3)), and the normalization convention (Eq. (4)); these are assumed model definitions, not outputs of the analysis. The two headline effects are computed, not fit: Delta N_eff follows from integrating the thermal energy density Eq. (8) with the same rho_KL and yields the analytic suppression Eq. (9), and the softened s-channel resonance follows from the propagator Eq. (5) and appears in the differential cross section Eq. (10). The IceCube exclusion is obtained by running the external nuSIProp code with the model cross section and comparing to the published HESE data; the astrophysical nuisance parameters are fit, but the model parameters lambda and mu_IR are scanned and the constraints are independent measurements. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [15,16,54,56]) concern the particle-mediator baseline, radiatively corrected Z width, and CMB decay effects; none of them supplies the unparticle spectral ansatz or the comparison to BBN/IceCube data, so none is load-bearing. The central result is contingent on the assumed smooth continuum spectral shape, including the absence of a discrete pole at the gap; that is a model-dependence or correctness concern, not a circularity, because the assumption is stated explicitly and is not itself derived from the conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the gapped unparticle model (spectral density, normalization, propagator) and on benchmark choices for Lambda and M. These are not fitted to the target result but are assumed inputs from prior unparticle literature. The IceCube fit includes astrophysical nuisance parameters that are constrained by data.

free parameters (6)

lambda
Dimensionless Yukawa coupling between the unparticle and tau neutrino, Eq. (1). Scanned in Fig. 1 and fitted in the MCMC with unconstrained prior.
mu_IR
Mass gap of the unparticle spectral density, Eq. (2). Scanned in Fig. 1 and fitted in the MCMC.
Lambda = 100 GeV (benchmark)
UV scale entering the spectral normalization, Eq. (4), and the effective interaction strength, Eq. (7). Fixed to 100 GeV in all figures.
d_u = 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 (benchmarks)
Scaling dimension of the unparticle. Discrete benchmark values chosen to illustrate the du dependence.
M = 500 GeV (Fig. 1); range 100 GeV to 100 TeV in Fig. 7
UV mass scale in the Z invisible width calculation, Eq. (36). The bound strengthens with M; Fig. 1 fixes M = 500 GeV.
gamma_astro, Phi_astro, sum m_nu
Astrophysical and neutrino mass nuisance parameters in the IceCube fit, Eq. (34). Marginalized over in the MCMC.

assumptions (6)

ad hoc to paper The hidden sector is described by a gapped unparticle with Kallen-Lehmann spectral density rho_KL(m^2) = A_du (m^2 - mu_IR^2)^{du-2} for m^2 > mu_IR^2.
Introduced in Eq. (2). Assumes a pure power-law continuum with a hard gap, not derived from a specific UV completion.
domain assumption The unparticle field U couples only to tau neutrinos via Eq. (1); other flavor couplings are set to zero.
Flavor structure assumed to evade pion/kaon constraints; tau-philic coupling is a motivated choice.
ad hoc to paper The spectral density normalizes to one particle's worth: integral rho/(2 pi) dm^2 = Lambda^{2(du-1)}, leading to Eq. (4).
This normalization is needed for the Delta N_eff suppression; it is a convention, not a measurable input from data.
ad hoc to paper The unparticle propagator is approximated by Eq. (5) with mu_UV >> mu_IR, |q^2|, and the absorptive part is resummed into ImSigma(q^2).
Used for all cross sections. Assumes the width resummation is valid and that the neutrino bubble dominates the self-energy.
domain assumption The unparticle states are fully thermalized at BBN temperature.
The Delta N_eff calculation assumes equilibrium; no detailed thermalization calculation is provided, though the interaction rate appears sufficient for the shown parameter space.
domain assumption The IceCube HESE data are described by a single power-law astrophysical flux plus atmospheric background.
Standard assumption carried over from Ref. [28] and used in the MCMC fit.

invented entities (1)

Gapped unparticle mediator U independent evidence
purpose: Mediates strong neutrino self-interactions via a continuum of masses; the mass gap mu_IR sets the low-energy effective scale, and du > 1 broadens the resonance and suppresses Delta N_eff.
The model is falsifiable through future IceCube-Gen2 UHE neutrino observations, FCC-ee invisible Z width measurements, and CMB-S4 Delta N_eff measurements. No direct signal has been observed yet, but the paper provides explicit experimental targets.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enabling Strong Neutrino Self-interaction with an Unparticle Mediator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HUMSHYEJ

@misc{pith2026250102049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enabling Strong Neutrino Self-interaction with an Unparticle Mediator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HUMSHYEJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02049}
}

abstract

Recent explorations of the cosmic microwave background and the large-scale structure of the universe have indicated a preference for sizable neutrino self-interactions, much stronger than what the Standard Model offers. When interpreted in the context of simple particle-physics models with a light, neutrinophilic scalar mediator, some of the hints are already in tension with the combination of terrestrial, astrophysical and cosmological constraints. We take a novel approach by considering neutrino self-interactions through a mediator with a smooth, continuous, spectral density function. We consider Georgi's unparticle with a mass gap as a concrete example and point out two useful effects for mitigating two leading constraints. 1) The Unparticle is ``broadband'' -- it occupies a wide range of masses which allows it to pass the early universe constraint on effective number of extra neutrinos ($\Delta N_{\rm eff.}$) even if the mass gap lies below the MeV scale. 2) Scattering involving unparticles is less resonant -- which lifts the constraint set by IceCube based on a recent measurement of ultra-high-energy cosmogenic neutrinos. Our analysis shows that an unparticle mediator can open up ample parameter space for strong neutrino self-interactions of interest to cosmology and serves a well-motivated target for upcoming experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02049 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Self-interacting neutrino parameter space for particle (top-left) and unparticle (others) mediator cases, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Contribution to ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Near-resonance behavior of the neutrino self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Posterior distributions of the parameters of interest for an unparticle scenario with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Neutrino flux at Earth in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Constraints on the particle case as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Widen the Resonance at Ultra-High Energies: Novel Probes of Neutrino Self-interactions in the High-Mass Regime
hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

If one neutrino species in the cosmic neutrino background is still relativistic today, UHE neutrinos scattering off it can resonantly disappear over a broad energy range, and GRAND could detect that dip to probe neutr...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

C. D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and O. Dor´ e, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123505 (2020), arXiv:1902.00534 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2020
[2]

This will lead to a slightly higher ∆Neff

The future FCC-ee collider can measure the invisible Z width by 8 times more precisely [50, 51] using the ra- diative return channel; 3) With a mass gap below MeV, part of the unparticle states freeze out by decaying into neutrinos at temperatures between BBN and CMB. This will lead to a slightly higher ∆Neff. for CMB [52–54] and be tested by the upcoming...

work page
[3]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh, JCAP 07, 038 (2021), arXiv:2011.12315 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2021
[4]

Roy Choudhury, S

S. Roy Choudhury, S. Hannestad, and T. Tram, JCAP 03, 084 (2021), arXiv:2012.07519 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2021
[5]

Brinckmann, J

T. Brinckmann, J. H. Chang, and M. LoVerde, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063523 (2021), arXiv:2012.11830 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2021
[6]

C. D. Kreisch et al., Phys. Rev. D 109, 043501 (2024), arXiv:2207.03164 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2024
[7]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh, JCAP 09, 042 (2023), arXiv:2303.08843 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2023
[8]

A. He, R. An, M. M. Ivanov, and V. Gluscevic, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103527 (2024), arXiv:2309.03956 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2024

Show all 57 references

[9]

Camarena, F.-Y

D. Camarena, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and J. Houghtel- ing, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103535 (2023), arXiv:2309.03941 [astro-ph.CO]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Camarena and F.-Y

D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, (2024), arXiv:2403.05496 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[11]

S. Pal, R. Samanta, and S. Pal, (2024), arXiv:2409.03712 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[12]

Racco, P

D. Racco, P. Zhang, and H. Zheng, (2024), 6 arXiv:2412.04959 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[13]

J. M. Berryman et al., Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101267 (2023), arXiv:2203.01955 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[14]

Gerbino et al., Phys

M. Gerbino et al., Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101333 (2023), arXiv:2203.07377 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[15]

A. S. Chou et al. , in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2211.09978 [hep-ex]

2022 arXiv
[16]

J. M. Berryman, A. De Gouvˆ ea, K. J. Kelly, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075030 (2018), arXiv:1802.00009 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[17]

Blinov, K

N. Blinov, K. J. Kelly, G. Z. Krnjaic, and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 191102 (2019), arXiv:1905.02727 [astro-ph.CO]

2019 arXiv
[18]

V. D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Rev. D 25, 907 (1982)

1982
[19]

Brdar, M

V. Brdar, M. Lindner, S. Vogl, and X.-J. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115001 (2020), arXiv:2003.05339 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[20]

K.-F. Lyu, E. Stamou, and L.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015004 (2021), arXiv:2004.10868 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[21]

P. S. B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha, and Y. Zhang, (2024), arXiv:2407.12738 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Pitrou, A

C. Pitrou, A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, Phys. Rept. 754, 1 (2018), arXiv:1801.08023 [astro-ph.CO]

2018 arXiv
[23]

A. G. Adame et al. (DESI), (2024), arXiv:2411.12022 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[24]

H. G. Escudero and K. N. Abazajian, (2024), arXiv:2412.05451 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[25]

Ioka and K

K. Ioka and K. Murase, PTEP 2014, 061E01 (2014), arXiv:1404.2279 [astro-ph.HE]

2014 arXiv
[26]

K. C. Y. Ng and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065035 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 089904 (2014)], arXiv:1404.2288 [astro-ph.HE]

2014 arXiv
[27]

Ibe and K

M. Ibe and K. Kaneta, Phys. Rev. D 90, 053011 (2014), arXiv:1407.2848 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[28]

Kamada and H.-B

A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113004 (2015), arXiv:1504.00711 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[29]

Esteban, S

I. Esteban, S. Pandey, V. Brdar, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123014 (2021), arXiv:2107.13568 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[30]

Abbasi et al

R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube), Phys. Rev. D 104, 022002 (2021), arXiv:2011.03545 [astro-ph.HE]

2021
[31]

Georgi, Phys

H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 221601 (2007), arXiv:hep- ph/0703260

2007
[32]

Georgi, Phys

H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 650, 275 (2007), arXiv:0704.2457 [hep-ph]

2007 arXiv
[33]

Arkani-Hamed and Y

N. Arkani-Hamed and Y. Grossman, Phys. Lett. B 459, 179 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9806223

1999 arXiv
[34]

Cacciapaglia, G

G. Cacciapaglia, G. Marandella, and J. Terning, JHEP 02, 049 (2009), arXiv:0804.0424 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[35]

Falkowski and M

A. Falkowski and M. Perez-Victoria, JHEP 12, 107 (2008), arXiv:0806.1737 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[36]

J. A. Cabrer, G. von Gersdorff, and M. Quiros, New J. Phys. 12, 075012 (2010), arXiv:0907.5361 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[37]

Chacko, P

Z. Chacko, P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, and Z. Liu, JHEP 03, 112 (2021), arXiv:2012.01443 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[38]

Cs´ aki, S

C. Cs´ aki, S. Hong, G. Kurup, S. J. Lee, M. Perel- stein, and W. Xue, Phys. Rev. D 105, 035025 (2022), arXiv:2105.07035 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[39]

J. D. Qualls, (2015), arXiv:1511.04074 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[40]

P. J. Fox, A. Rajaraman, and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075004 (2007), arXiv:0705.3092 [hep-ph]

2007 arXiv
[41]

Cacciapaglia, G

G. Cacciapaglia, G. Marandella, and J. Terning, JHEP 01, 070 (2008), arXiv:0708.0005 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[42]

Rajaraman, Phys

A. Rajaraman, Phys. Lett. B 671, 411 (2009), arXiv:0806.1533 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[43]

Delgado, J

A. Delgado, J. R. Espinosa, J. M. No, and M. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D 79, 055011 (2009), arXiv:0812.1170 [hep- ph]

2009 arXiv
[44]

Chen, X.-G

S.-L. Chen, X.-G. He, X.-P. Hu, and Y. Liao, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 317 (2009), arXiv:0710.5129 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[45]

Lee, Phys

S. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 58, 043004 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9604098

1998
[46]

Bhattacharjee and G

P. Bhattacharjee and G. Sigl, Phys. Rept. 327, 109 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9811011

2000 arXiv
[47]

IceCube Collaboration, in HESE 7.5 year data release (2021)

2021
[48]

Foreman-Mackey, D

D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Good- man, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific 125, 306–312 (2013)

2013
[49]

Navas et al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

S. Navas et al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[50]

M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube-Gen2), J. Phys. G 48, 060501 (2021), arXiv:2008.04323 [astro-ph.HE]

2021
[51]

Abada et al

A. Abada et al. (FCC), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019)

2019
[52]

Abada et al.(FCC), Eur

A. Abada et al.(FCC), Eur. Phys. J. ST228, 261 (2019)

2019
[53]

Chacko, L

Z. Chacko, L. J. Hall, T. Okui, and S. J. Oliver, Phys. Rev. D 70, 085008 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312267

2004 arXiv
[54]

Escudero Abenza, JCAP 05, 048 (2020), arXiv:2001.04466 [hep-ph]

M. Escudero Abenza, JCAP 05, 048 (2020), arXiv:2001.04466 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[55]

K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 041101 (2021), arXiv:2011.02487 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[56]

nusiprop: Numerical solver for neu- trino self-interactions in astrophysical environments,

I. Esteban, “nusiprop: Numerical solver for neu- trino self-interactions in astrophysical environments,” https://github.com/ivan-esteban-phys/nuSIprop/ blob/main/Details.pdf (2024), accessed: 2024-11-19

2024
[57]

2 (S−1)2(2−du) + S2w2 # , (26) where the integral is given by 2 w2 T +−T −

Y. Zhang, (2024), arXiv:2411.05070 [hep-ph]. 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL A. ∆Neff. contribution from unparticle with a small mass gap In this appendix, we derive an analytic formula for the unparticle contribution to ∆Neff. in the limit µIR ≪ TBBN ≪ µUV. While this range does no...

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

C. D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and O. Dor´ e, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123505 (2020), arXiv:1902.00534 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2020

[2] [2]

This will lead to a slightly higher ∆Neff

The future FCC-ee collider can measure the invisible Z width by 8 times more precisely [50, 51] using the ra- diative return channel; 3) With a mass gap below MeV, part of the unparticle states freeze out by decaying into neutrinos at temperatures between BBN and CMB. This will lead to a slightly higher ∆Neff. for CMB [52–54] and be tested by the upcoming...

work page

[3] [3]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh, JCAP 07, 038 (2021), arXiv:2011.12315 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

Roy Choudhury, S

S. Roy Choudhury, S. Hannestad, and T. Tram, JCAP 03, 084 (2021), arXiv:2012.07519 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2021

[5] [5]

Brinckmann, J

T. Brinckmann, J. H. Chang, and M. LoVerde, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063523 (2021), arXiv:2012.11830 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2021

[6] [6]

C. D. Kreisch et al., Phys. Rev. D 109, 043501 (2024), arXiv:2207.03164 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh, JCAP 09, 042 (2023), arXiv:2303.08843 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2023

[8] [8]

A. He, R. An, M. M. Ivanov, and V. Gluscevic, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103527 (2024), arXiv:2309.03956 [astro- ph.CO]

arXiv 2024