Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

The Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope on board Aditya-L1

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that SUIT on Aditya-L1 is the first instrument to image the full solar disk continuously in the 200–400 nm range at 1.4 arcseconds, and that it will deliver spatially resolved measurements of solar broadband ultraviolet…

desk verdict SUIT is a genuine first: a full-disk 200–400 nm solar imager, and the paper reports the hardware in enough detail to be the standard reference; the irradiance-measurement claim, however, is not yet backed by in-orbit radiometric verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02274 v2 pith:EV2GQUFT submitted 2025-01-04 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM

Durgesh Tripathi , A. N. Ramaprakash , Sreejith Padinhatteeri , Janmejoy Sarkar , Mahesh Burse , Anurag Tyagi , Ravi Kesharwani , Sakya Sinha
show 70 more authors
Bhushan Joshi Rushikesh Deogaonkar Soumya Roy V. N. Nived Rahul Gopalakrishnan Akshay Kulkarni Aafaque Khan Avyarthana Ghosh Chaitanya Rajarshi Deepa Modi Ghanshyam Kumar Reena Yadav Manoj Varma Raja Bayanna Pravin Chordia Mintu Karmakar Linn Abraham H. N. Adithya Abhijit Adoni Gazi A. Ahmed Dipankar Banerjee Bhargava Ram Rani Bhandare Subhamoy Chatterjee Kalpesh Chillal Arjun Dey Achim Gandorfer Girish Gowda T. R. Haridas Anand Jain Melvin James R. P. Jayakumar Evangeline Leeja Justin Nagaraju K. Deepak Kathait Pravin Khodade Mandeep Kiran Abhay Kohok Natalie Krivova Nishank Kumar Nidhi Mehandiratta Vilas Mestry Srikanth Motamarri Sajjade F. Mustafa Dibyendu Nandy S. Narendra Sonal Navle Nashiket Parate Anju M Pillai Sujit Punnadi A. Rajendra A. Ravi Bijoy Raha K. Sankarasubramanian Ghulam Sarvar Nigar Shaji Nidhi Sharma Aditya Singh Shivam Singh Sami K. Solanki Vivek Subramanian Rethika T Srikanth T Satyannarayana Thatimattala Hari Krishna Tota Vishnu TS Amrita Unnikrishnan Kaushal Vadodariya D. R. Veeresha R. Venkateswaran
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IM PACS 95.55.Fw96.60.-s
keywords SolarUltravioletImagingTelescopeAditya-L1nearchromospherephotospherespectralirradiancefilterimagerflaredynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (SUIT) as the first instrument to image the full solar disk continuously in the near and mid ultraviolet, 200–400 nm, with 1.4 arcseconds per pixel and 11 narrow- and broad-band filters. Its aim is to show that SUIT opens a new observational window on the photosphere and chromosphere, allowing the magnetic coupling of the lower and middle solar atmosphere to be studied at high cadence, and providing spatially resolved measurements of solar broadband ultraviolet radiation for the first time. Such measurements are the missing ingredient for constraining how solar spectral irradiance varies in a wavelength range that drives stratospheric ozone chemistry and influences Earth's climate. The paper documents the telescope design, filter system, detector, calibration, onboard flare intelligence, and data products that are supposed to deliver this capability.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the telescope and its two-stage spectral selection: a custom-coated thermal filter at the entrance aperture that blocks about 99.75% of visible and 99.5% of infrared light while transmitting roughly 0.2–0.3% of the 200–400 nm band, followed by two independently rotating filter wheels carrying eleven science filters (eight narrow-band, three broad-band) and five complementary blocking filters. Images are recorded by a back-thinned, UV-enhanced 4096×4096 CCD cooled to −55 °C, with the field of view of 1.5 solar radii at 0.7 arcsecond pixels. The effective-area model, $EA(\lambda) = A \cdot TF(\lambda) \cdot PMR(\lambda) \cdot SMR(\lambda) \cdot SF(\lambda) \cdot CF(\lambda) \cdot L(\lambda) \cdot QE(\lambda)$, combines the measured transmission and reflectivity of every element along the ray path and is the basis for converting raw counts into photometry; a field-corrector lens on a piezo stage and tilted filter mounts suppress ghost images.

What would settle it

Compare SUIT's full-disk photometry in each of its 200–400 nm filter bands with contemporaneous, independently calibrated measurements of solar spectral irradiance in the same wavelength range (for example, from a solar ultraviolet radiometer on another platform); if the SUIT-derived fluxes disagree by more than the stated calibration uncertainties, the effective-area model is falsified. A simpler in-flight check is to measure the point-spread function on a sharp solar feature: a FWHM clearly broader than about 1.4 arcseconds would falsify the imaging-performance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SUIT provides, for the first time, near-simultaneous full-disk and region-of-interest images of the Sun in the 200–400 nm range, at 1.4 arcsecond resolution and 0.7 arcsecond pixels, slicing through the photosphere and chromosphere with 11 filters that include the Mg ii h and k and Ca ii H lines. By combining a thermal filter at the entrance aperture with two filter wheels and a 4096×4096 UV-enhanced CCD, the instrument is designed to measure the spatially resolved contribution of solar features to the near- and mid-ultraviolet solar spectral irradiance, a quantity that has until now only been estimated from disk-integrated measurements or models. The paper also claims that the onboard flare detection and region-of-interest tracking, with a 4-second cadence, will capture flare energy distributions in the near ultraviolet, and that the instrument's calibration, the effective-area model built from measured transmissions, reflectivities, and quantum efficiencies, supports photometric science.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction that SUIT will deliver science-ready photometry depends on the assumption that the ground-based calibration of the thermal filter, science filters, mirrors, and CCD, the effective-area model, remains valid after launch, during five years at L1, and after radiation exposure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SUIT's full-disk 200–400 nm images will let researchers separate the disk-integrated ultraviolet irradiance into contributions from active regions, sunspots, and quiet Sun for the first time.
  • Combined with Aditya-L1's other remote-sensing and in-situ instruments, SUIT observations will cover the solar atmosphere from photosphere to corona and the solar wind at L1 from one platform.
  • The combination of Mg ii h and k and Ca ii H narrow-band filters with a 4-second region-of-interest cadence provides a new channel for studying chromospheric dynamics and flare energy release in the near ultraviolet.
  • The 1.4 arcsecond resolution across the full disk enables studies of MHD waves and their role in energy transfer between the photosphere and the overlying chromosphere.
  • Science-ready Level-1 and radiometrically calibrated Level-2 data products will be publicly archived, making the 200–400 nm window available to the whole community.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the effective-area calibration holds in flight, SUIT's spatially resolved fluxes can be integrated to produce a daily solar spectral irradiance record in the near ultraviolet with detail that disk-averaged instruments cannot give.
  • The simultaneous Mg ii h and k and Ca ii H filters might be used as a chromospheric heating diagnostic without needing a spectrograph, by comparing the line-to-continuum ratio across the disk.
  • A natural test of the photometric calibration is to compare SUIT's broadband flux in overlapping bands with quasi-contemporaneous measurements from other space-based ultraviolet instruments; disagreement beyond stated uncertainties would pinpoint degradation of the thermal filter or mirrors.
  • The onboard flare trigger, which uses signals from the HEL1OS and SoLEXS instruments to repoint the region of interest, foreshadows a standard operating mode for multi-wavelength flare campaigns that could be adopted by future solar observatories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper describes the Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (SUIT) on Aditya-L1, a two-mirror off-axis Ritchey-Chrétien telescope with an effective focal length of 3500 mm, a 4096x4096 UV-enhanced CCD, 0.7 arcsec/pixel plate scale, and 1.5 R_sun field of view. It presents the optical design, CODE V tolerance analysis, measured PSFs for the eleven science filters, the effective-area model EA(λ), component-level ground measurements (thermal filter transmission, mirror reflectance, filter profiles, lens transmission, CCD QE), mechanisms, electronics, structural and thermal design, and the data pipeline. The central scientific claim is that SUIT provides, for the first time, near-simultaneous full-disk and region-of-interest images of the Sun in 200-400 nm, enabling spatially resolved measurements of solar broad-band NUV/MUV radiation and thereby constraining solar ultraviolet irradiance variability relevant to Earth's atmosphere.

Significance. If the claims hold, SUIT opens a genuinely new observational window: no previous instrument has combined full-disk coverage with 1.4 arcsec resolution and 11 filters across 200-400 nm, a wavelength range central to solar atmospheric coupling and Earth's atmospheric chemistry. The paper's strengths include detailed, measured component characterizations (thermal filter transmission over 30 samples, mirror reflectivity, filter profiles, CCD QE), an end-to-end measured PSF for each science filter, a transparent effective-area formula, and a thorough description of mechanisms, electronics, and thermal design. The design and ground-calibration work are reported in enough detail to be reproducible, and companion papers provide additional depth on the thermal filter, detector, and flare-trigger intelligence. The main limitation is that no in-orbit or first-light data are presented, so the absolute radiometric/irradiance capability remains a pre-flight expectation rather than a demonstrated result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (1)] The effective-area formula labels A as the area of the entrance aperture and gives A = 0.01561 m^2, but Section 2 and Table 2 specify an entrance aperture diameter of 146 mm, whose area is 0.01675 m^2. The value 0.01561 m^2 corresponds to a 141 mm diameter, i.e., the primary mirror clear aperture. Because Eq. (1) is the basis for all absolute flux and SSI-related predictions, this inconsistency must be resolved: either correct the label or justify using the primary-mirror area in the effective-area model.
  2. [Abstract and Sections 2, 3, 10] The paper states that SUIT 'continuously provides' full-disk images and 'allows the measurements of spatially resolved solar broad-band radiation' for SSI variability, but it presents no first-light or in-orbit calibration data even though the mission launched in September 2023. The in-orbit validity of the pre-flight EA(λ) model in Section 3 is not demonstrated: the LED calibration unit (Section 4.3) samples only 258 nm and 356 nm and cannot constrain wavelength-dependent degradation or out-of-band leakage across 200-400 nm. I recommend explicitly stating that the science capabilities are pre-flight expectations and, if available, adding a brief commissioning status, while separating the demonstrated imaging capability from the not-yet-demonstrated absolute radiometric/irradiance capability.
  3. [Section 9] The data product description is internally inconsistent: 'Level 1 data is fully science-ready data' is immediately followed by 'Level-2 processing produces data products that will be fully calibrated for radiometric calibration.' Please clarify which level contains the radiometric calibration and what 'science-ready' means; this matters for user expectations of the photometric accuracy that underpins the SSI claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Tables 1, 4 and text] Filter nomenclature is inconsistent between Table 1 (NB1-NB8, BB1-BB3), the text (NB01, NB02, ...), and Table 4 (NB04, BP02, BP03, BP04); standardize the IDs across tables and text.
  2. [Section 4.1] The text says the TF blocks 99.75% of visible light (0.25% transmission) but later says visible transmission falls to ≈0.1%; reconcile these numbers or specify different spectral sub-ranges.
  3. [Table 2] Table 2 contains the incomplete line 'Filters Entrance aperture blocking (out band)'; either complete the entry or delete it.
  4. [Section 3] Eq. (1) is unnumbered; number it and all other display equations for cross-referencing.
  5. [Section 4.5] The sentence 'the optical surfaces were polished the optical surfaces to 1.5 nm RMS micro-roughness' contains a duplicated phrase; rephrase.
  6. [References] References to companion papers (Sarkar et al. 2024; Sreejith et al. 2024; Tripathi et al. 2025) are marked 'in preparation'; if they are now published or accepted, update the citations before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: instrument description grounded in direct measurements and external benchmarks.

full rationale

This paper is an instrument description, not a derivation of a scientific result from fitted inputs. Its central claims are that SUIT provides near-simultaneous full-disk and region-of-interest images in 200–400 nm with 11 filters, and that this opens a new observational window for spatially resolved NUV/MUV irradiance studies. The load-bearing technical quantity, the effective area EA(lambda) in Eq. (1), is the product of laboratory-measured component responses (thermal filter transmission, mirror reflectivities, filter transmissions, lens transmission, and CCD quantum efficiency). Each component characterization is reported with its own measurements (e.g., the thermal filter transmission from 30 representative samples in Figure 8, mirror reflectance in Figure 10, filter transmission profiles in Figure 12, CCD QE in Figure 15), and the effective-area model is not fitted to any target radiance or irradiance result. The 'for the first time' claim is supported by a survey of previous facilities (SMM/UVSP, IRIS, Sunrise/SuFI, SUSI) cited from the external literature, so it does not rest on self-citation. The cited companion papers by the SUIT team (Ghosh et al. 2022; Varma et al. 2023a,b; Sarkar et al. 2024; Sreejith et al. 2024; Tripathi et al. 2025) describe component development, detector characterization, onboard flare intelligence, and the science plan; none is invoked as an external uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the present measurements. The absence of in-orbit calibration data and first-light verification is a genuine validation gap for the radiometric science goals, but it is not a circularity: an unverified forward model is not a loop in which an output is defined or fitted in terms of itself. The paper therefore exhibits no self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing, uniqueness-importation, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its claims rest on standard optical engineering plus the domain assumption that ground calibration transfers to the flight environment. The detector and coating characterizations are, in part, inherited from prior qualification of similar devices.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The ground-measured transmission, reflectivity, and QE profiles are accurate for the flight instrument after launch and in orbit.
    The effective area model EA(λ) in Section 3 multiplies these measured profiles, and the paper's performance claims depend on them remaining valid in flight; no in-orbit calibration data are shown.
  • standard math The optical prescription and CODE V tolerance analysis correctly predict the delivered image quality.
    Section 3 uses standard ray-tracing software; this assumes the model inputs match the as-built optics.
  • domain assumption The CCD272-84 detector characterization is representative of the flight device.
    Section 4.6 relies on a reduced lot acceptance test and similarity to Euclid VIS devices rather than full flight-unit testing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope on board Aditya-L1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EV2GQUFT

@misc{pith2026250102274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope on board Aditya-L1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EV2GQUFT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02274}
}
read the original abstract

The Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (SUIT) is an instrument on the Aditya-L1 mission of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) launched on September 02, 2023. SUIT continuously provides, near-simultaneous full-disk and region-of-interest images of the Sun, slicing through the photosphere and chromosphere and covering a field of view up to 1.5 solar radii. For this purpose, SUIT uses 11 filters tuned at different wavelengths in the 200{--}400~nm range, including the Mg~{\sc ii} h~and~k and Ca~{\sc ii}~H spectral lines. The observations made by SUIT help us understand the magnetic coupling of the lower and middle solar atmosphere. In addition, for the first time, it allows the measurements of spatially resolved solar broad-band radiation in the near and mid ultraviolet, which will help constrain the variability of the solar ultraviolet irradiance in a wavelength range that is central for the chemistry of the Earth's atmosphere. This paper discusses the details of the instrument and data products.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02274 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A CAD model of the Aditya-L1 spacecraft. SUITis labeled. • Solar flare dynamics and their energy distribution: at what wavelength do flares radiate most of their energy and what fraction of a flare’s energy is contained within the NUV range? What is the spectral energy distribution in flares? • Physics of eruptions at various spatio-temporal scales: what are chromo￾spheric signatures and counterparts of eruptive phe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: CAD model of SUIT assembly with the top cover and radiator assembly removed, showing the internal configuration of the telescope. Various components of the telescopes are labeled. Right: SUITwithout the top cover panel. shutter, and the focusing mechanisms. The telescope assembly and the FWE are connected to the PE via SpaceWire harness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2D layout of SUIT optical design. The tilted filter configuration has been derived from ghost image analysis. The reference axes is shown for defining tilts. Light rays of different colors show incident light of various field angles. on a linear piezo-driven stage to allow for possible focus adjustments during the instrument’s in-orbit calibration. The PE box executes the operational modes, including the on board in… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cumulative probability plot for SUIT 80% diffraction scaled encircled energy after applying the tolerance in CODE-V. alignment tolerances. The wave-front differential method in Code V is used to estimate the effect of simultaneous errors, and the change in 80% encircle…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effective area as a function of wavelength of different filter combinations. EA(λ) =A [T F(λ) PMR(λ) SMR(λ) SF(λ) CF(λ) L(λ) QE(λ)] where, A = Area of the entrance aperture = 0.01561 m2 , TF(λ) = Thermal filter transmission profile, PMR(λ) = Primary mirror reflectivity…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measured SUIT PSF in detector centre for the various science filter combinations. The colorbar is normalized over the plotted region to add up to unity. The shape of the peak represents the shape of the PSF, where the height corresponds to the normalized intensity whic…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Isometric view (left) and actual photo (right) of the thermal filter assembly mounted on the SUIT optical bench. remove residual particles and organic contamination before loading into the coating chamber. Once inside the chamber, the substrate was Ion-cleaned with Arg…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Absolute transmission profile of the thermal filter as a function of wavelength. The solid yellow curve shows a mean transmission profile based on measurements over 30 repre￾sentative samples. The red and blue dashed curves enclose the variations in the transmission va…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Flight model of the Primary (left) and the secondary (right) mirror assemblies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Absolute reflectance of primary and secondary mirrors. to low-stress flexures on invar rings. The mirror and invar ring assemblies are mounted on stands made of Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). The mirrors, with their respective ring and mount along with the ring and the s…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spectrum for LED1 (left) and LED2 (right) The LED calibration unit is located between the shutter and the filter wheel. It is designed to provide uniform detector illumination for calibration and long-term degradation studies. The LED calibration unit consists of sixt…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Absolute transmission profiles of the eleven SUIT Science filters (top and middle) and complementary filters (bottom) as a function of wavelength. common mechanical housing to allow for better co-alignment of the wheels and reduce the overall mass. Two independent ste…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top: Isometric CAD view of the filter wheel (left) and cut section of the filter mounting arrangement with the tapered support ring to control the filter tilt with respect to the beam (right). Mid: CAD model of the filter wheel assembly. Bottom: Assembled flight model…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Left: Flight model of field corrector lens assembly. Right: Absolute transmission of the field corrector lens as a function of wavelength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Top left: Quantum efficiency curve for CCD 272-84 with custom anti-reflection coating. Top right: A CAD representation (sectioned view) of the detector Assembly showing the mounting scheme and cooling chain for the detector. Bottom: Detector Assembly and heat pipe mou…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Image of the flight model CCD in the transport container recorded during post-delivery inspection. SOLA: manuscript.tex; 13 January 2025; 1:18; p. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: A CAD representation of the multi-operational door mechanisms showing the stowed (top-left) and deployed (top-right) configurations. The door mechanism mounted on the external baffle of SUIT (bottom). coil excitation. The detent torque and bearing friction are suffici…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Image of the flight model of the shutter mechanism assembly. The motor with the blade is co-mounted on the secondary baffle mount next to the filter wheel assembly. For exposures less than ≈ 300 ms, the blade is continuously rotated to sweep the beam with the blade op…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Block diagram of the SUIT electronics showing the six PCBs and their interfaces with various internal and external subsystems. 6.1. Processing Electronics (PE) Board The Processing Electronics (PE) board is built around Microsemi make space￾qualified FPGA, the main ce…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Top-level Block Schematic of the SUIT Processing Electronics board. The PE firmware is a combination of native VHDL module(s) and on-chip 8051 IP core microcode. 8051 IP core acts as a master controller that controls and monitors all the operations. SUIT operational s…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Top-level Isometric CAD view of the SUITpackage (left) and the finite element model of SUITshowing the mesh elements for the full model (right top) and the internal view with FEM meshes for the assemblies (right bottom). due to the low thermal expansion coefficient. T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Study of Quasi-Periodic Pulsations in Solar and Stellar Flares with SKA

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    SKA’s radio imaging spectroscopy and polarisation will enable decisive tests of QPP mechanisms in solar and stellar flares, including weak events and solar–stellar comparisons.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Barthol, P., Gandorfer, A., Solanki, S.K., Sch¨ ussler, M., Chares, B., Curdt, W., Deutsch, W., Feller, A., Germerott, D., Grauf, B., Heerlein, K., Hirzberger, J., Kolleck, M., Meller, R., M¨ uller, R., Riethm¨ uller, T.L., Tomasch, G., Kn¨ olker, M., Lites, B.W., Card, G., Elmore, D., Fox, J., Lecinski, A., Nelson, P., Summers, R., Watt, A., Mart ´ ınez ...

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    DOI. ADS. Bohlin, J.D., Frost, K.J., Burr, P.T., Guha, A.K., Withbroe, G.L.: 1980, Solar Maximum Mission. Sol. Phys. 65,

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    DOI. ADS. Krivova, N.A., Solanki, S.K., Fligge, M., Unruh, Y.C.: 2003, Reconstruction of solar irradiance variations in cycle 23: Is solar surface magnetism the cause? Astron. Astrophys. 399, L1. DOI. ADS. Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., Augu` eres, J.-L., Brinchmann, J., Cole, R., Cropper, M., Dabin, C., Duvet, L., Ealet, A., Garilli, B., Gondoin,...

    arXiv 2003

  4. [5]

    DOI. ADS. Cropper, M., Cole, R., James, A., Mellier, Y., Martignac, J., Di Giorgio, A.-M., Paltani, S., Genolet, L., Fourmond, J.-J., Cara, C., Amiaux, J., Guttridge, P., Walton, D., Thomas, P., Rees, K., Pool, P., Endicott, J., Holland, A., Gow, J., Murray, N., Duvet, L., Augueres, J.-L., Laureijs, R., Gondoin, P., Kitching, T., Massey, R., Hoekstra, H.:...

    work page 2012

  5. [9]

    DOI. ADS. Rochus, P., Auch` ere, F., Berghmans, D., Harra, L., Schmutz, W., Sch¨ uhle, U., Addison, P., Appourchaux, T., Aznar Cuadrado, R., Baker, D., Barbay, J., Bates, D., BenMoussa, A., Bergmann, M., Beurthe, C., Borgo, B., Bonte, K., Bouzit, M., Bradley, L., B¨ uchel, V., Buchlin, E., B¨ uchner, J., Cab´ e, F., Cadiergues, L., Chaigneau, M., Chares, ...

    work page 2020

  6. [12]

    DOI. ADS. Solanki, S.K., del Toro Iniesta, J.C., Woch, J., Gandorfer, A., Hirzberger, J., Alvarez-Herrero, A., Appourchaux, T., Mart ´ ınez Pillet, V., P´ erez-Grande, I., Sanchis Kilders, E., Schmidt, W., G´ omez Cama, J.M., Michalik, H., Deutsch, W., Fernandez-Rico, G., Grauf, B., Gizon, L., Heerlein, K., Kolleck, M., Lagg, A., Meller, R., M¨ uller, R.,...

    work page 2020

  7. [14]

    DOI. ADS. Tripathi et al., D.: 2025, Critical Science Plan with SUIT. Sol. Phys. in prepatation. Varma, M., Padinhatteeri, S., Sinha, S., Tyagi, A., Burse, M., Yadav, R., Kumar, G., Ramaprakash, A., Tripathi, D., Sankarasubramanian, K., Nagaraju, K., Vadodariya, K., Tadepalli, S., Deogaonkar, R., Olekar, M., Azaruddin, M., Unnikrishnan, A.: 2023a, The Sol...

    work page 2025

  8. [17]

    DOI. ADS. M¨ uller, D., St. Cyr, O.C., Zouganelis, I., Gilbert, H.R., Marsden, R., Nieves-Chinchilla, T., Antonucci, E., Auch` ere, F., Berghmans, D., Horbury, T.S., Howard, R.A., Krucker, S., Maksimovic, M., Owen, C.J., Rochus, P., Rodriguez-Pacheco, J., Romoli, M., Solanki, S.K., Bruno, R., Carlsson, M., Fludra, A., Harra, L., Hassler, D.M., Livi, S., L...

    work page 2020

Show all 16 references
  1. [35]

    DOI. ADS. Ghosh, A., Kesharwani, R., Khan, A.R., Padinhatteeri, S., Tripathi, D., Ramaprakash, A.N., Patel, K., Jalluri, T.D.P.V., Madhumalathi, G.R., Venkateshwaran, R., Elumalai, S., Gupta, SOLA: manuscript.tex; 13 January 2025; 1:18; p. 34 SUIT on board Aditya-L1 K., Nair, ...

    2025

  2. [73]

    DOI. ADS. SOLA: manuscript.tex; 13 January 2025; 1:18; p. 37

    2025

  3. [207]

    DOI. ADS. Singh, K.P., Tandon, S.N., Agrawal, P.C., Antia, H.M., Manchanda, R.K., Yadav, J.S., Seetha, S., Ramadevi, M.C., Rao, A.R., Bhattacharya, D., Paul, B., Sreekumar, P., Bhattacharyya, S., Stewart, G.C., Hutchings, J., Annapurni, S.A., Ghosh, S.K., Murthy, J., Pati, A.,...

    2014

  4. [256]

    DOI. ADS. Woodgate, B.E., Tandberg-Hanssen, E.A., Bruner, E.C., Beckers, J.M., Brandt, J.C., Henze, W., Hyder, C.L., Kalet, M.W., Kenny, P.J., Knox, E.D., Michalitsianos, A.G., Rehse, R., Shine, R.A., Tinsley, H.D.: 1980, The ultraviolet spectrometer and polarimeter on the Sol...

    1980

  5. [311]

    DOI. ADS. Solanki, S.K., Barthol, P., Danilovic, S., Feller, A., Gandorfer, A., Hirzberger, J., Riethm¨ uller, T.L., Sch¨ ussler, M., Bonet, J.A., Mart ´ ınez Pillet, V., del Toro Iniesta, J.C., Domingo, V., Palacios, J., Kn¨ olker, M., Bello Gonz´ alez, N., Berkefeld, T., Fra...

    2010

  6. [583]

    ADS. Tripathi, D., Chakrabarty, D., Nandi, A., Raghvendra Prasad, B., Ramaprakash, A.N., Shaji, N., Sankarasubramanian, K., Satheesh Thampi, R., Yadav, V.K.: 2023, The Aditya-L1 mission of ISRO. In: Cauzzi, G., Tritschler, A. (eds.) The Era of Multi-Messenger Solar Physics, IA...

    2023

  7. [2733]

    DOI. ADS. Ermolli, I., Matthes, K., Dudok de Wit, T., Krivova, N.A., Tourpali, K., Weber, M., Unruh, Y.C., Gray, L., Langematz, U., Pilewskie, P., Rozanov, E., Schmutz, W., Shapiro, A., Solanki, S.K., Woods, T.N.: 2013, Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and i...

    2013

  8. [3945]

    DOI. ADS. Feller, A., Gandorfer, A., Iglesias, F.A., Lagg, A., Riethm¨ uller, T.L., Solanki, S.K., Katsukawa, Y., Kubo, M.: 2020, The SUNRISE UV Spectropolarimeter and imager for SUNRISE III. In: Evans, C.J., Bryant, J.J., Motohara, K. (eds.) Ground-based and Airborne Instrume...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.