Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Understand, Solve and Translate: Bridging the Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning Gap

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.02448 v2 pith:76M2JRFT submitted 2025-01-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningperformancebenchmarkcapabilitiesenglishhrm8kkoreanlanguages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance on complex reasoning tasks. However, despite their strong reasoning capabilities in high-resource languages (e.g., English and Chinese), a significant performance gap persists in other languages. To investigate this gap in Korean, we introduce HRM8K, a benchmark comprising 8,011 English-Korean parallel bilingual math problems. Through systematic analysis of model behaviors, we identify a key finding: these performance disparities stem primarily from difficulties in comprehending non-English inputs, rather than limitations in reasoning capabilities. Based on these findings, we propose UST (Understand, Solve, and Translate), a method that strategically uses English as an anchor for reasoning and solution generation. By fine-tuning the model on 130k synthetically generated data points, UST achieves a 10.91% improvement on the HRM8K benchmark and reduces the multilingual performance gap from 11.6% to 0.7%. Additionally, we show that improvements from UST generalize effectively to different Korean domains, demonstrating that capabilities acquired from machine-verifiable content can be generalized to other areas. We publicly release the benchmark, training dataset, and models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    An integrated survey organizing AI mathematical reasoning into informal, formal, discovery, and technique axes while cataloging benchmarks and assessing failure modes.

  2. EfficientXLang: Towards Improving Token Efficiency Through Cross-Lingual Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reasoning in non-English languages reduces thinking tokens by 20-40% while largely preserving math accuracy, with savings persisting after translation to English.

  3. Simulating LLM-to-LLM Tutoring for Multilingual Math Feedback

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A large LLM-to-LLM math tutoring simulation across 11 languages shows English-language hints often yield the largest accuracy gains for student models, but the low-resource-language results lack statistical support.

  4. BenchHub: A Unified Benchmark Suite for Holistic and Customizable LLM Evaluation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BenchHub is an automatically categorized, customizable LLM benchmark suite covering 303K questions across 38 benchmarks in English and Korean.

Pith tools