REVIEW 1 cited by
A Bureaucratic Theory of Statistics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This commentary proposes a framework for understanding the role of statistics in policy-making, regulation, and bureaucratic systems. I introduce the concept of "ex ante policy," describing statistical rules and procedures designed before data collection to govern future actions. Through examining examples, particularly clinical trials, I explore how ex ante policy serves as a calculus of bureaucracy, providing numerical foundations for governance through clear, transparent rules. The ex ante frame obviates heated debates about inferential interpretations of probability and statistical tests, p-values, and rituals. I conclude by calling for a deeper appreciation of statistics' bureaucratic function and suggesting new directions for research in policy-oriented statistical methodology.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Aggregated Individual Reporting for Post-Deployment Evaluation
The authors formalize a mechanism for collecting and aggregating public reports about deployed AI systems, aiming to surface unknown harms and enable accountability.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.