Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 140 references

Streams, Shells, and Substructures in the Accretion-Built Stellar Halo of NGC 300

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Deep resolved-star imaging shows NGC 300's halo was built by a dwarf-galaxy merger.

desk verdict First wide-field resolved-star map of NGC 300's halo reveals a 40 kpc stream and shells; the accretion interpretation is plausible but still photometric until stream stars get spectra. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04089 v1 pith:TIQHQHLM submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.GA

Catherine E. Fielder , David J. Sand , Michael G. Jones , Denija Crnojević , Alex Drlica-Wagner , Paul Bennet , Jeffrey L. Carlin , William Cerny
show 22 more authors
Amandine Doliva-Dolinsky Laura C. Hunter Ananthan Karunakaran Guilherme Limberg Burçin Mutlu-Pakdil Andrew B. Pace Sarah Pearson Adam Smercina Kristine Spekkens Tjitske Starkenburg Jay Strader Guy S. Stringfellow Erik Tollerud Clecio R. Bom Julio A. Carballo-Bello Astha Chaturvedi Yumi Choi David J. James Clara E. Martínez-Vázquez Alex Riley Joanna Sakowska Kathy Vivas
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords NGC300stellarhalostreamsgalaxyaccretiondwarfgalaxiesredgiantbranchstarsglobularclustersMagellanicCloudanalogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using deep wide-field imaging that resolves individual stars in the outskirts of NGC 300, an LMC-mass spiral galaxy at 2.01 Mpc, this paper finds a stellar halo full of substructure rather than a smooth exponential disk. The authors identify a low-surface-brightness stream extending more than 40 kpc to the north, a possible southern counterpart, two shell-like features, and a smooth metal-poor halo component. The stream and shells are photometrically metal-poor ([Fe/H] around -1.2 to -1.4), in contrast with the more metal-rich inner halo, and their summed luminosity suggests a single Fornax-like dwarf progenitor with a mass ratio near 1:15 to NGC 300. If the interpretation is correct, this provides direct evidence that accretion is an important assembly mechanism for the halos of dwarf galaxies at the LMC mass scale, and it naturally explains previously reported breaks in the outer light profile and a twisted outer H i disk.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a resolved red giant branch (RGB) star census: a color-magnitude selection box isolating RGB stars at the adopted 2.01 Mpc distance, from which the authors build smoothed stellar density maps and identify overdensities by eye. For each feature they construct background-subtracted color-magnitude diagrams and metallicity distribution functions, interpolating photometric metallicities from a grid of 10 Gyr stellar evolution isochrones in 0.25 dex steps. Luminosities are corrected for the fraction of light below the magnitude limit using a standard initial mass function, and stellar masses follow from a published color-magnitude relation. The decisive interpretive step is comparing the features' photometric metallicities and combined luminosity to the dwarf-galaxy metallicity-luminosity relation and to minor-merger simulations, which yields the single-progenitor, Fornax-like interpretation.

What would settle it

Take spectra of roughly ten to twenty resolved stars along the northern stream and compare their radial velocities with NGC 300's systemic velocity of about 144 km/s: if the stars scatter around the velocity of the Milky Way or background rather than clustering near 144 km/s with a tidal-stream gradient, the stream would not be physically associated with NGC 300, and the accretion-built halo interpretation would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that NGC 300, long regarded as a pristine exponential disk galaxy, actually has an accretion-built stellar halo. In resolved red giant branch star maps, the authors report a northern stream ($M_V \sim -8.5$; $\langle[\mathrm{Fe/H}]\rangle = -1.4 \pm 0.15$) that reaches a projected distance of about 40 kpc, a southern feature that may be the stream's wrap, two shell-like overdensities at 19 and 25 kpc, and a smooth, predominantly metal-poor halo. All of the discrete features are more metal-poor than the inner halo, and the combined light is consistent with a single progenitor of roughly Fornax's luminosity, corresponding to a mass ratio near 1:15 with NGC 300. The paper also reports a metal-poor globular cluster ($R_{\mathrm{proj}} = 23.3$ kpc; $M_V = -8.99 \pm 0.16$; $[\mathrm{Fe/H}] \approx -1.6 \pm 0.6$) that is plausibly an accreted remnant of the same event. The conclusion is that substructure around NGC 300 represents the richest set of accretion features seen in a Magellanic Cloud analog to date.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the faint overdensities seen in the red-giant-star map are real stars at NGC 300's distance rather than clumps of unresolved background galaxies or foreground stars, since no individual stream star has yet been confirmed spectroscopically.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NGC 300's halo is substantially built by accretion: a single dwarf, roughly Fornax-like in luminosity and with a 1:15 mass ratio, can produce the northern stream, southern wrap, shells, and part of the smooth halo.
  • The previously puzzling features of NGC 300—breaks in the outer stellar density profile and the twisted outer neutral-hydrogen disk—are coherently explained by the same accretion event.
  • The newly found metal-poor globular cluster GCF25 is probably an accreted cluster, making it the farthest confirmed globular cluster of NGC 300 and a tracer of the merger.
  • A stellar stream can survive out to roughly 40 kpc around an LMC-mass galaxy at the current detection depth, meaning shallow or narrow surveys can miss most of a dwarf's accretion history.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stream membership is confirmed with radial velocities, the straight northern stream would be a useful probe of the shape of NGC 300's dark-matter halo, much as straight streams have been used for more massive hosts.
  • The resemblance to NGC 4449 and to the NGC 2403/DDO 44 system suggests dwarf-dwarf accretion may be common at LMC mass; a systematic survey of more isolated LMC analogs could test whether such features are typical or rare.
  • The photometric metallicities carry systematic uncertainty from isochrone choice; narrow-field space-based photometry of the stream and shells could reveal metallicity or distance gradients that would distinguish the single-progenitor scenario from multiple accretion events.
  • The shells' positions between the stream and the globular cluster hint that the cluster may share the progenitor's orbit; measuring velocities of the cluster and shell stars could test that connection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents deep g/i DECam imaging from the DELVE-DEEP survey around NGC 300, an LMC-mass galaxy at 2.01 Mpc, and reports the discovery of a low-surface-brightness northern stellar stream extending ~40 kpc, a possible southern stream wrap, two shell-like features, and a smooth halo component, plus a spectroscopically confirmed metal-poor globular cluster (GCF25). The authors argue from RGB-selected resolved-star density maps, background-subtracted CMDs, and photometric metallicity distributions that these features are metal-poor ([Fe/H] ~ -1.2 to -1.4) and most plausibly result from the accretion and disruption of a single Fornax-like dwarf, with an inferred mass ratio of roughly 1:15 relative to NGC 300. They place this result in the context of prior HST, Gemini, and H I studies and argue that accretion is an important assembly mechanism for dwarf galaxy stellar halos.

Significance. If the stream and shells are genuine NGC 300 members, the paper provides one of the richest resolved-star views of an accretion-built stellar halo around a dwarf galaxy and would materially strengthen the case that LMC-mass galaxies assemble part of their halos through minor mergers. The paper's strengths include the wide, deep DELVE-DEEP data, the use of background-subtracted CMDs and MDFs to characterize the features, the radial-velocity confirmation of the newly found globular cluster, and a generally cautious tone (luminosities are labeled as lower limits, and the single-progenitor assumption is stated rather than hidden). The main weakness is that the central stream detection rests entirely on photometric overdensities selected by eye; no spectroscopic membership for individual stream RGB stars is presented, and the quantitative significance of the features relative to realistic background contamination is not demonstrated. Because the accretion-built claim and the derived progenitor properties are directly built on these detections, the paper is important but currently requires additional analysis before the strong conclusions are fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, §4.2] The identification and membership of Stream N rest on a visually identified overdensity of RGB-selected point sources and on background subtraction with either a large annulus (130'<r<160') or a single same-distance box. Since the star-galaxy classifier efficiency 'starts to diminish below i~23' (§2.1) while the RGB selection extends to i=24.4, a radially varying population of compact galaxies misclassified as stars could in principle produce a narrow overdensity that survives annulus subtraction. No spectrum of a stream RGB star is presented; the SOAR spectrum in §2.2 confirms only GCF25. I request (1) a quantitative significance map of the stream relative to the local background, computed in bins of magnitude and color, (2) a demonstration that the feature persists with a more conservative star-galaxy cut (e.g., 0≤class≤1), and (3) an explicit test of whether a radial gradient in unresolved background galaxies could mimic the stream.
  2. [§5.2, Table 1] The progenitor luminosity, stellar mass, and the quoted 1:15 mass ratio are derived by summing the photometric excesses of all features under the assumption of a single progenitor, but Table 1 lists no uncertainties for M_V, log L_V, or M*, and the text states these are lower limits. The selection boxes were drawn by eye, and §5.1 concedes that Stream S and the shells may be unrelated or partly in situ. The 'Fornax-like' conclusion therefore rests on an unquantified combination of selection choices and an untested physical assumption. Please propagate the luminosity-function correction (76%/84% in §3) and the background-subtraction uncertainty into error bars, and state explicitly how the conclusions change if only Stream N is treated as securely accreted.
  3. [§4.2, §4.3] The background-subtracted CMDs and MDFs are the main evidence that the features are real stellar populations at the distance of NGC 300, but the background definition is not validated. For Stream N a same-distance box is used, while the other features use the outer annulus, and the text notes that the Stream N result is similar with the annulus without showing this comparison. A systematic offset in the background MDF would coherently shift the mean metallicities used to argue for a common metal-poor progenitor. Please show the sensitivity of the mean [Fe/H] and the background-subtracted counts to the background choice, for example by using several same-distance boxes at different azimuths or varying the annulus width.
  4. [§3] The features are identified by eye in smoothed density maps (Figure 2), and the selection boxes are drawn by eye (Figure 3). For low-count features such as Shell 1 (N=25 in Figure 6), the probability that the overdensity is a Poisson fluctuation or a mask/depth artifact is not quantified. I request an automated or at least a statistically grounded detection procedure—for example, a matched-filter or wavelet decomposition with a false-positive estimate—or, failing that, an explicit statement of the detection significance of each feature relative to the local background.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.3, Figure 6, §5.2] There are several typos that should be corrected: 'metallicites' in §4.3 and the Figure 6 caption, 'The means that' in §5.2, and 'Copenagen' in the author affiliations.
  2. [Table 1, §4.3] The paper notes that some MDFs are not well fit by a Gaussian, but Table 1 quotes only the Gaussian mean with a uniform 0.15 dex error. Please also tabulate the median background-subtracted metallicity, which is already computed but not reported in the table.
  3. [§4.2] The sentence about 'the abundances of features around NGC 300' is unclear; please rephrase to describe why same-distance background boxes are difficult to define.
  4. [§2.1] The paper reports average 5σ and 10σ depths but does not quantify the depth variation across the field. Since differential depth between the stream region and the background annulus could create or suppress apparent overdensities, a depth map or per-field depth range would strengthen the analysis.
  5. [§4.4] The half-light radius of GCF25 is large (11.4±1.5 pc), and the text notes that a nearby background galaxy may contaminate the measurement. A two-component photometric fit or an explicit masking test would make the 'possible nuclear star cluster remnant' suggestion in §5.4 more robust.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stream and shell detection is data-driven, and the single-progenitor luminosity is an explicitly conditional estimate, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

The core detection chain is photometric and data-driven: RGB stars are selected with an isochrone-based CMD box at the adopted TRGB distance, and the streams and shells are identified as spatial overdensities in that resolved-star map. The background-subtracted CMDs and MDFs are consistency checks on the same photometric selection rather than fitted predictions, and the mean metallicities are interpolated from external Dartmouth isochrones with an adopted 0.15 dex model uncertainty. Luminosities and stellar masses are computed from standard IMF and mass-to-light calibrations (Kroupa; Taylor et al.), with the paper explicitly labeling them approximate lower limits. The single-progenitor luminosity is introduced with the conditional phrase 'assuming all of the features are from one or more accretion events' and is a sum of the observed feature luminosities; this is a transparent if-then estimate rather than a hidden derivation, and the accretion interpretation is supported independently by the metal-poor MDFs, the absence of young populations, the twisted outer H I disk, and morphological analogies to M31 and simulations. Self-citations (DELVE survey papers, Tan et al. data reduction, Mutlu-Pakdil et al. host halo mass, Crnojevic et al. MDF method) are infrastructure, methodology, or external literature measurements; none is a uniqueness theorem, a fitted input, or an ansatz that forces the stream properties. The main scientific risk is photometric membership and background contamination without stream-star spectroscopy, which is a correctness and robustness concern, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger captures the main chosen inputs: a hand-defined RGB box, a single background annulus, a 10 Gyr age, a 0.15 dex metallicity error floor, and subjective feature boxes. The strongest interpretive claims additionally assume that the features are at NGC 300's distance, that background subtraction is unbiased, that the IMF extrapolation holds, and that a single progenitor produced all features. No new physical entities are introduced; the stream, shells, and GC are observations, not postulates.

free parameters (5)
  • Photometric metallicity error floor = 0.15 dex
    Adopted as half of the 0.25 dex isochrone spacing rather than derived from the data; used for all quoted [Fe/H] uncertainties.
  • Isochrone age for RGB selection and MDFs = 10 Gyr (8 and 12 Gyr tested for the GC only)
    Selected based on prior literature for NGC 300 outskirts; the CMD and metallicity scale depend on this age assumption.
  • RGB selection box = mi <= 24.4 with color bounds for [Fe/H] about -2 to -0.5 at 10 Gyr
    Hand-defined CMD box; defines which stars enter the density maps, luminosities, and MDFs. Results are reported as similar at 5-sigma depth, but the boundary choice is not derived from data.
  • Background annulus = 130 arcmin < r < 160 arcmin (7.59 square degrees)
    Chosen as a single distant background region for most subtractions; spatial variation of contamination is not modeled.
  • Feature selection boxes for streams and shells = Hand-drawn boxes around apparent overdensities
    Areas, luminosities, and masses depend on these subjective boundaries; authors note boundaries are non-trivial and some boxes overlap.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption NGC 300 is at a TRGB distance of 2.01 +/- 0.03 Mpc.
    Adopted from Dalcanton 2009; all physical sizes, magnitudes, and luminosities assume this distance.
  • domain assumption 10 Gyr Dartmouth and PARSEC isochrones with [alpha/Fe]=0 adequately represent the old metal-poor stellar populations.
    Used for RGB selection, photometric metallicity interpolation, and GC metallicity; systematic isochrone errors are acknowledged but not quantified.
  • domain assumption The overdensity features are physical stellar structures at the distance of NGC 300.
    No spectroscopy for individual stream stars; membership is inferred from CMD positions consistent with metal-poor RGB stars at that distance.
  • domain assumption The large-annulus background subtraction accurately removes unrelated contamination for each feature.
    Used for all CMDs, MDFs, and luminosity estimates; contamination may vary with radius.
  • domain assumption A Kroupa IMF can be used to extrapolate the luminosity below the RGB completeness limit.
    Used to correct luminosities for missing fainter stars; the IMF at these low masses is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper All detected features are debris from a single accretion event when estimating the progenitor.
    The single progenitor luminosity and 1:15 mass ratio assume one disrupted dwarf; alternatives are acknowledged but not modeled.
  • domain assumption The Munshi 2021 stellar-to-halo mass relation and Kirby 2013 mass-metallicity relation apply to disrupted dwarfs.
    Used to convert summed stellar mass to halo mass; the authors note uncertainties and differing virial definitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Streams, Shells, and Substructures in the Accretion-Built Stellar Halo of NGC 300." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TIQHQHLM

@misc{pith2026250104089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Streams, Shells, and Substructures in the Accretion-Built Stellar Halo of NGC 300},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TIQHQHLM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04089}
}
abstract

We present deep optical observations of the stellar halo of NGC 300, an LMC-mass galaxy, acquired with the DEEP sub-component of the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey (DELVE) using the 4 m Blanco Telescope. Our resolved star analysis reveals a large, low surface brightness stellar stream ($M_{V}\sim-8.5$; [Fe/H] $= -1.4\pm0.15$) extending more than 40 kpc north from the galaxy's center. We also find other halo structures, including potentially an additional stream wrap to the south, which may be associated with the main stream. The morphology and derived low metallicities of the streams and shells discovered surrounding NGC 300 are highly suggestive of a past accretion event. Assuming a single progenitor, the accreted system is approximately Fornax-like in luminosity, with an inferred mass ratio to NGC 300 of approximately $1:15$. We also present the discovery of a metal-poor globular cluster ($R_{\rm{proj}}=23.3$~kpc; $M_{V}=-8.99\pm0.16$; [Fe/H] $\approx-1.6\pm0.6$) in the halo of NGC 300, the furthest identified globular cluster associated with NGC 300. The stellar structures around NGC 300 represent the richest features observed in a Magellanic Cloud analog to date, strongly supporting the idea that accretion and subsequent disruption is an important mechanism in the assembly of dwarf galaxy stellar halos.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04089 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Color-magnitude diagram of a subset of DELVE￾DEEP sources in the field of NGC 300 out to 0.5 × rvir. We over-plot our RGB selection box in cyan. For reference we also plot a few 10 Gyr Dartmouth isochrones (Dotter et al. 2008) of different metallicities (see legend), shifted to the distance of NGC 300. of point sources in DELVE-DEEP within 0.5 × rvir of NGC 300. Note that in the CMDs of the various halo features the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A red giant branch map of NGC 300 constructed from the DELVE-DEEP data. Crowding within the galaxy itself led to non-detections, hence the hole at the center of the density map. We draw a dashed ellipse to denote NGC 300 using a position angle of θ = 109◦ (de Vaucouleurs & Page 1962) for the major axis (which spans southeast to northwest), axis ratio b/a = 0.67 (Lauberts & Valentijn 1989), and R25 = 10.9 ′ (Bland-Ha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Same as the right column of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CMDs of the various features in proximity to NGC 300. The cyan box marks the RGB selection used to construct the RGB density maps (same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: MDFs for each feature identified around NGC 300, derived by interpolating metallicity values for individual RGB stars between isochrones of fixed age and varied metallicity. The background MDF has been subtracted from each other MDF, which are then normalized to the to…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of GCs within NGC 300, first iden￾tified by Kim et al. (2002) and Olsen et al. (2004) and con￾firmed in Nantais et al. (2010). High confidence GCs are marked by filled points (14), while lower confidence GCs are marked by open points (3). Our newly discove…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The normalized SOAR spectrum of NGC 300- GCF25. We highlight the strong Balmer lines as well as the Mg b and NaD absorption lines, which are common GC absorption features. and then radializes the rest of the debris (Vasiliev et al. 2022). Alternatively, the shells migh…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The stellar metallicity ([Fe/H]) - luminosity (MV ) relation for dwarf galaxies, adapted from Collins & Read (2022). Observations of isolated Local Group dwarfs and dwarfs around well-studied massive hosts are included, in addition to a few stream progenitor estimates …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: H i column density contours from Westmeier et al. (2011) taken with the ATCA overlaid on the same RGB point source map as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbott, T. M. C., Adam´ ow, M., Aguena, M., et al. 2021, ApJS, 255, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 2021

  2. [2]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    Akeson, R., Armus, L., Bachelet, E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 2019

  3. [3]

    Amorisco, N. C. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2882, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2229

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2229 2017

  4. [4]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 5101, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3185 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Annibali, F., Beccari, G., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5101, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3185 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaborat...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3185 2020

  5. [5]

    2020, PASA, 37, e046, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.38

    Baumgardt, H., Sollima, A., & Hilker, M. 2020, PASA, 37, e046, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.38

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.38 2020

  6. [6]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 5957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1474

    Baumgardt, H., & Vasiliev, E. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1474

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1474 2021

  7. [7]

    A., Leaman, R., Gallart, C., et al

    Beasley, M. A., Leaman, R., Gallart, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1986, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1349

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1349 2019

  8. [8]

    J., et al

    Belokurov, V., Erkal, D., Deason, A. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3357

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3357 2017

Show all 140 references
  1. [9]

    C., & Draine, B

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., Vlaji´ c, M., Freeman, K. C., & Draine, B. T. 2005, ApJ, 629, 239, doi: 10.1086/430512

    2005 doi

  2. [10]

    2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    2022 doi

  3. [12]

    P., & Strader, J

    Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 193, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092441

    2006

  4. [13]

    L., & Norman, M

    Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 495, 80, doi: 10.1086/305262

    1998 doi

  5. [14]

    S., & Johnston, K

    Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, doi: 10.1086/497422

    2005 doi

  6. [15]

    J., Mart ´ ınez-Delgado, D., & Brandner, W

    Butler, D. J., Mart ´ ınez-Delgado, D., & Brandner, W. 2004, AJ, 127, 1472, doi: 10.1086/381922

    2004 doi

  7. [16]

    1985, ApJS, 58, 107, doi: 10.1086/191031

    Carignan, C. 1985, ApJS, 58, 107, doi: 10.1086/191031

    1985 doi

  8. [17]

    L., Sand, D

    Carlin, J. L., Sand, D. J., Price, P., et al. 2016, ApJL, 828, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L5

    2016 doi

  9. [18]

    L., Garling, C

    Carlin, J. L., Garling, C. T., Peter, A. H. G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c32

    2019 doi

  10. [19]

    L., Sand, D

    Carlin, J. L., Sand, D. J., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dcd

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    Chen, Y., Bressan, A., Girardi, L., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    2015 doi

  12. [21]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    Chen, Y., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    2014 doi

  13. [22]

    C., Crain, J

    Clemens, J. C., Crain, J. A., & Anderson, R. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 331–340, doi: 10.1117/12.550069

    2004 doi

  14. [23]

    Collins, M. L. M., & Read, J. I. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 647, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01657-4

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    Collins, M. L. M., Tollerud, E. J., Rich, R. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3496, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3252

    2020 doi

  16. [25]

    Collins, M. L. M., Chapman, S. C., Rich, R. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/172

    2013 doi

  17. [26]

    Collins, M. L. M., Read, J. I., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1624

    2021 doi

  18. [27]

    D., van Dokkum, P., et al

    Conroy, C., Johnson, B. D., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.13048, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.13048

    2023 doi arXiv

  19. [29]

    R., Gilbert, K

    Cullinane, L. R., Gilbert, K. M., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad003b

    2023 doi

  20. [30]

    C., Hunt, J

    Cunningham, E. C., Hunt, J. A. S., Price-Whelan, A. M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187b

    2024 doi

  21. [31]

    J., Williams, B

    Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Seth, A. C., et al. 2009a, ApJS, 183, 67, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/1/67 —. 2009b, ApJS, 183, 67, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/1/67 de Vaucouleurs, G., & Page, J. 1962, ApJ, 136, 107, doi: 10.1086/147355

    1962 doi

  22. [32]

    J., Belokurov, V., & Sanders, J

    Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., & Sanders, J. L. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2793

    2019 doi

  23. [33]

    J., Bose, S., Fattahi, A., et al

    Deason, A. J., Bose, S., Fattahi, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4044, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3524

    2022 doi

  24. [34]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    2019 doi

  25. [35]

    A., Peter, A

    Dooley, G. A., Peter, A. H. G., Carlin, J. L., et al. 2017a, MNRAS, 472, 1060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2001

    doi

  26. [36]

    A., Peter, A

    Dooley, G. A., Peter, A. H. G., Yang, T., et al. 2017b, MNRAS, 471, 4894, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1900

    doi

  27. [37]

    2008, ApJS, 178, 89, doi: 10.1086/589654

    Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi´ c, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89, doi: 10.1086/589654

    2008 doi

  28. [38]

    L., Nidever, D

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Carlin, J. L., Nidever, D. L., et al. 2021, ApJS, 256, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac079d 21

    2021 doi

  29. [39]

    S., Adam´ ow, M., et al

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Ferguson, P. S., Adam´ ow, M., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac78eb

    2022 doi

  30. [40]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 131, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/131 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, et al

    El-Badry, K., Wetzel, A., Geha, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 131, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/131 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13491, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13491

    2016 doi

  31. [41]

    2022, ApJS, 258, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac26c1

    Everett, S., Yanny, B., Kuropatkin, N., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac26c1

    2022 doi

  32. [42]

    A., Weinberg, M

    Fardal, M. A., Weinberg, M. D., Babul, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1121

    2013 doi

  33. [43]

    S., et al

    Fitts, A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 319, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1488

    2018 doi

  34. [44]

    T., Honscheid, K., et al

    Flaugher, B., Diehl, H. T., Honscheid, K., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    2015 doi

  35. [45]

    P., Guhathakurta, P., et al

    Geha, M., van der Marel, R. P., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 361, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/361

    2010 doi

  36. [46]

    2010, ApJ, 719, 229, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/229 Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., Madore, B

    Genel, S., Bouch´ e, N., Naab, T., Sternberg, A., & Genzel, R. 2010, ApJ, 719, 229, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/229 Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., Madore, B. F., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 185, doi: 10.1086/516636

    2010 doi

  37. [47]

    M., Dalcanton, J

    Gogarten, S. M., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 858, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/858

    2010 doi

  38. [48]

    2025, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.15.0, v1.15.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14593523

    Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Haberland, M., et al. 2025, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.15.0, v1.15.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14593523

    2025 doi

  39. [49]

    F., Smercina, A., et al

    Gozman, K., Bell, E. F., Smercina, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbe3a

    2023 doi

  40. [50]

    J., & Carlin, J

    Grillmair, C. J., & Carlin, J. L. 2016, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 420, Tidal Streams in the Local Group and Beyond, ed. H. J. Newberg & J. L. Carlin, 87, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19336-6 4

    2016 doi

  41. [51]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 2, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/2

    Gu, M., Conroy, C., & Behroozi, P. 2016, ApJ, 833, 2, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/2

    2016 doi

  42. [52]

    2014, AJ, 148, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/53

    Gullikson, K., Dodson-Robinson, S., & Kraus, A. 2014, AJ, 148, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/53

    2014 doi

  43. [53]

    F., et al

    Harmsen, B., Monachesi, A., Bell, E. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1491, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2992

    2017 doi

  44. [54]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  45. [55]

    Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487, doi: 10.1086/118116

    1996 doi

  46. [56]

    G., Choi, A., Amon, A., et al

    Hartley, W. G., Choi, A., Amon, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 3547, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3055

    2022 doi

  47. [57]

    R., Majewski, S

    Hayes, C. R., Majewski, S. R., Hasselquist, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab62ad

    2020 doi

  48. [58]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 205, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917

    Helmi, A. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 205, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917

    2020 doi

  49. [59]

    Hernquist, L., & Quinn, P. J. 1987, ApJ, 312, 1, doi: 10.1086/164844

    1987 doi

  50. [60]

    2009, ApJ, 705, 704, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/704

    Gallart, C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 704, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/704

    2009 doi

  51. [61]

    R., & McConnachie, A

    Higgs, C. R., & McConnachie, A. W. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 2766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1754

    2021 doi

  52. [62]

    J., Williams, B

    Hillis, T. J., Williams, B. F., Dolphin, A. E., Dalcanton, J. J., & Skillman, E. D. 2016, ApJ, 831, 191, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/191

    2016 doi

  53. [63]

    A., Malhan, K., & Martin, N

    Ibata, R. A., Malhan, K., & Martin, N. F. 2019, ApJ, 872, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0080

    2019 doi

  54. [64]

    A., Lewis, G

    Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., McConnachie, A. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 128, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/128 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    2014 doi

  55. [65]

    S., de Jong, R

    Jang, I. S., de Jong, R. S., Minchev, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038651

    2020 doi

  56. [66]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 2245, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw990

    Jarvis, M., Sheldon, E., Zuntz, J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2245, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw990

    2016 doi

  57. [67]

    D., Conroy, C., Naidu, R

    Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abab08

    2020 doi

  58. [68]

    E., Huang, S., et al

    Kado-Fong, E., Greene, J. E., Huang, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacc2

    2020 doi

  59. [69]

    E., Greene, J

    Kado-Fong, E., Sanderson, R. E., Greene, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6c88

    2022 doi

  60. [70]

    2016, A&A, 585, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527041

    Kang, X., Zhang, F., Chang, R., Wang, L., & Cheng, L. 2016, A&A, 585, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527041

    2016 doi

  61. [71]

    D., Makarov, D

    Karachentsev, I. D., Makarov, D. I., & Kaisina, E. I. 2013, AJ, 145, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/101

    2013 doi

  62. [72]

    Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/264.1.201

    1993 doi

  63. [73]

    C., Sung, H., & Lee, M

    Kim, S. C., Sung, H., & Lee, M. G. 2002, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 35, 9, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2002.35.1.009

    2002 doi

  64. [74]

    C., Sung, H., Park, H

    Kim, S. C., Sung, H., Park, H. S., & Sung, E.-C. 2004, ChJA&A, 4, 299, doi: 10.1088/1009-9271/4/4/299

    2004 doi

  65. [75]

    N., Cohen, J

    Kirby, E. N., Cohen, J. G., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/102

    2013 doi

  66. [76]

    E., Gilmore, G., Walker, M

    Koposov, S. E., Gilmore, G., Walker, M. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 146, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/146

    2011 doi

  67. [77]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x —

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x —. 2002, Science, 295, 82, doi: 10.1126/science.1067524

    2001

  68. [78]

    2016, A&A, 596, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628397

    Laine, J., Laurikainen, E., & Salo, H. 2016, A&A, 596, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628397

    2016 doi

  69. [79]

    Lauberts, A., & Valentijn, E. A. 1989, The surface photometry catalogue of the ESO-Uppsala galaxies (Simbad)

    1989

  70. [80]

    S., Ji, A

    Li, T. S., Ji, A. P., Pace, A. B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac46d3 22

    2022 doi

  71. [81]

    Limberg, G., Queiroz, A. B. A., Perottoni, H. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb694

    2023 doi

  72. [82]

    T., & Bovy, J

    Mackereth, J. T., & Bovy, J. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3631, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa047

    2020 doi

  73. [83]

    2017, ApJ, 835, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77

    Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77

    2017 doi

  74. [84]

    2005, in Maps of the Cosmos, ed

    Martin, C., & GALEX Team. 2005, in Maps of the Cosmos, ed. M. Colless, L. Staveley-Smith, & R. A. Stathakis, Vol. 216, 221, doi: 10.1017/S0074180900196664

    2005 doi

  75. [85]

    F., Ibata, R

    Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/167 Mart ´ ınez-Delgado, D., Romanowsky, A. J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2012, ApJL, 748, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L24 Mart ´ ınez-Delgado, D., Roca-F` abrega, S., Mir´ o-...

    2016 doi

  76. [86]

    2012, ApJL, 755, L35, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L35

    Mashchenko, S. 2012, ApJL, 755, L35, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L35

    2012 doi

  77. [87]

    Minniti, D., & Zijlstra, A. A. 1996, ApJL, 467, L13, doi: 10.1086/310189 Mir´ o-Carretero, J., Mart ´ ınez-Delgado, D., G´ omez-Flechoso, M. A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A196, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451685

    1996 doi

  78. [88]

    2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 35, doi: 10.1007/s12036-019-9603-4

    Mondal, C., Subramaniam, A., & George, K. 2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 35, doi: 10.1007/s12036-019-9603-4

    2019 doi

  79. [89]

    A., Menanteau, F., et al

    Morganson, E., Gruendl, R. A., Menanteau, F., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 074501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef Mu˜ noz, R. R., Cˆ ot´ e, P., Santana, F. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac16b Mu˜ noz-Mateos, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., et al. 2007, ...

    2018 doi

  80. [90]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1247, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01493-y M¨ uller, O., Fahrion, K., Rejkuba, M., et al

    Mucciarelli, A., Massari, D., Minelli, A., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1247, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01493-y M¨ uller, O., Fahrion, K., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039359

    2021 doi

  81. [91]

    M., Applebaum, E., et al

    Munshi, F., Brooks, A. M., Applebaum, E., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db6

    2021 doi

  82. [92]

    J., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al

    Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Sand, D. J., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db8

    2021 doi

  83. [93]

    P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d2d

    2021 doi

  84. [94]

    B., Huchra, J

    Nantais, J. B., Huchra, J. P., Barmby, P., & Olsen, K. A. G. 2010, AJ, 139, 1178, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1178

    2010 doi

  85. [95]

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., & Johnston, K. V. 2023, ApJ, 954, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc

    2023 doi

  86. [96]

    L., Olsen, K., Choi, Y., et al

    Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., Choi, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafaf7

    2019 doi

  87. [97]

    Niederste-Ostholt, M., Belokurov, V., & Evans, N. W. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 207, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20602.x

    2012

  88. [98]

    Okamoto, S., Arimoto, N., Ferguson, A. M. N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab44a7

    2019 doi

  89. [99]

    Olsen, K. A. G., Miller, B. W., Suntzeff, N. B., Schommer, R. A., & Bright, J. 2004, AJ, 127, 2674, doi: 10.1086/383297

    2004 doi

  90. [100]

    Pace, A. B. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07424, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.07424 pandas development team, T. 2024, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, v2.2.3, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13819579

    2024 doi

  91. [101]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 5666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz725 —

    Pastorelli, G., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 5666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz725 —. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 3283, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2565

    2019 doi

  92. [102]

    M., Hogg, D

    Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfb

    2022 doi

  93. [103]

    E., et al

    Pearson, S., Besla, G., Putman, M. E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 1827, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw757

    2016 doi

  94. [104]

    C., Besla, G., et al

    Pearson, S., Privon, G. C., Besla, G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 3069, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2052

    2018 doi

  95. [105]

    W., Jord´ an, A., Blakeslee, J

    Peng, E. W., Jord´ an, A., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 42, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/42

    2009 doi

  96. [106]

    L., Willman, B., et al

    Pucha, R., Carlin, J. L., Willman, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29fb

    2019 doi

  97. [107]

    2022, A&A, 666, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142830

    Ramos, P., Antoja, T., Yuan, Z., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142830

    2022 doi

  98. [108]

    2005, ApJ, 632, 227, doi: 10.1086/432707 Ry´ s, A., Grocholski, A

    Roussel, H., Gil de Paz, A., Seibert, M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 227, doi: 10.1086/432707 Ry´ s, A., Grocholski, A. J., van der Marel, R. P., Aloisi, A., & Annibali, F. 2011, A&A, 530, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015881

    2005 doi

  99. [109]

    J., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Jones, M

    Sand, D. J., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Jones, M. G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16345, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16345

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [110]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  101. [111]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  102. [112]

    Sellwood, J. A. 2013, ApJL, 769, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L24

    2013 doi

  103. [113]

    Sheldon, E. S. 2014, MNRAS, 444, L25, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu104

    2014 doi

  104. [114]

    2018, ApJ, 862, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacdab

    Shipp, N., Drlica-Wagner, A., Balbinot, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacdab

    2018 doi

  105. [115]

    Simon, J. D. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 375, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104453 23

    2019 doi

  106. [116]

    F., Price, P

    Smercina, A., Bell, E. F., Price, P. A., et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd5d1

    2023 doi

  107. [117]

    S., & White, S

    Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 2006, Nature, 440, 1137, doi: 10.1038/nature04805

    2006 doi

  108. [118]

    K., Helmi, A., & Sales, L

    Starkenburg, T. K., Helmi, A., & Sales, L. V. 2016, A&A, 595, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201528066

    2016 doi

  109. [120]

    C., & Caldwell, N

    Strader, J., Seth, A. C., & Caldwell, N. 2012, AJ, 143, 52, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/52

    2012 doi

  110. [121]

    2020, A&A, 635, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937240

    Taibi, S., Battaglia, G., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937240

    2020 doi

  111. [122]

    2018, A&A, 618, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833414

    Taibi, S., Battaglia, G., Kacharov, N., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833414

    2018 doi

  112. [123]

    Y., Cerny, W., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al

    Tan, C. Y., Cerny, W., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.00865, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00865

    2024 doi arXiv

  113. [124]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 4287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    Tang, J., Bressan, A., Rosenfield, P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    2014 doi

  114. [125]

    N., Hopkins, A

    Taylor, E. N., Hopkins, A. M., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1587, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19536.x

    2011

  115. [126]

    A., Bianchi, L., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Thilker, D. A., Bianchi, L., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2010, ApJL, 714, L171, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L171

    2010 doi

  116. [127]

    A., Galazutdinova, O

    Tikhonov, N. A., Galazutdinova, O. A., & Drozdovsky, I. O. 2005, A&A, 431, 127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047042

    2005 doi

  117. [129]

    1986b, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1986b, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154

    doi

  118. [130]

    J., et al

    Toloba, E., Guhathakurta, P., Romanowsky, A. J., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 824, 35, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/35

    doi

  119. [131]

    J., Spekkens, K., et al

    Toloba, E., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016b, ApJL, 816, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L5

    doi

  120. [132]

    A., Bergbusch, P

    VandenBerg, D. A., Bergbusch, P. A., & Dowler, P. D. 2006, ApJS, 162, 375, doi: 10.1086/498451 Vanseviˇ cius, V., Arimoto, N., Hasegawa, T., et al. 2004, ApJL, 611, L93, doi: 10.1086/423802

    2006 doi

  121. [133]

    Vasiliev, E., Belokurov, V., & Evans, N. W. 2022, ApJ, 926, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fbc

    2022 doi

  122. [134]

    Veronese, S., de Blok, W. J. G., & Walter, F. 2023, A&A, 672, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245423

    2023 doi

  123. [135]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 Vlaji´ c, M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Freeman, K. C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 361, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/361

    2020 doi

  124. [136]

    Westmeier, T., Braun, R., & Koribalski, B. S. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 2217, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17596.x

    2011

  125. [137]

    White, S. D. M., & Frenk, C. S. 1991, ApJ, 379, 52, doi: 10.1086/170483

    1991 doi

  126. [138]

    F., Dalcanton, J

    Williams, B. F., Dalcanton, J. J., Stilp, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, 120, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/120

    2013 doi

  127. [139]

    Willmer, C. N. A. 2018, ApJS, 236, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf

    2018 doi

  128. [140]

    M., Kirby, E

    Wojno, J., Gilbert, K. M., Kirby, E. N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ccb

    2020 doi

  129. [141]

    D., Cox, T

    Younger, J. D., Cox, T. J., Seth, A. C., & Hernquist, L. 2007, ApJ, 670, 269, doi: 10.1086/521976

    2007 doi

  130. [142]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac616f

    Yuan, Z., Malhan, K., Sestito, F., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac616f

    2022 doi

  131. [143]

    2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    2009

  132. [144]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 1149, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2219

    Zuntz, J., Sheldon, E., Samuroff, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1149, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2219

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.