Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Nebular emission from composite star-forming galaxies -- I. A novel modelling approach

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Direct-method oxygen abundances in metal-rich galaxies can underestimate true O/H by factors of up to several.

desk verdict A genuinely useful method paper for composite galaxy emission; the qualitative direct-method bias is solid, but the 'factors of several' at high metallicity rests on an unvaried input distribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05424 v2 pith:ZHK5GKWP submitted 2025-01-09 astro-ph.GA

Christophe Morisset , Stéphane Charlot , Sebastián F. Sánchez , Carlos Espinosa-Ponce , Eric Barat , Thomas Dautreme This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HIIregionsnebularemissionoxygenabundancesdirectmethodmachinelearningsyntheticgalaxiesdiffuseionizedgasphotoionizationmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a way to calculate the integrated emission-line spectrum of a star-forming galaxy as a sum of many individual H II regions, each with its own ionization, temperature, density, age, and dust, rather than treating the galaxy as one single region. A regression neural network trained on about a million photoionization models makes this feasible: predicting the line ratios, electron temperature, and H-alpha luminosity of an H II region takes a fraction of a second, so the authors can assemble 250,000 synthetic galaxies containing 100 to roughly 3000 regions each, plus a diffuse ionized-gas component. They then ask whether the standard direct method, applied to the integrated spectrum, recovers the true H-alpha-weighted oxygen abundance of the constituent H II regions. The answer is no: the direct method underestimates O/H at both low and high metallicity, and at high metallicity the underestimate can reach factors of up to several. The paper argues that the bias is intrinsic to compositeness, because regions of different temperature contribute unequally to the strong lines and to the temperature-sensitive auroral lines.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is a regression artificial neural network used as a fast surrogate for the photoionization code Cloudy. The network has three hidden layers with 256, 512, and 256 GELU activation cells, is trained on 800,000 of the one-million-model H II region grid, takes 13 input parameters (ionization parameter, hydrogen density, gas filling factor, geometric form factor, stellar age, oxygen, carbon-to-oxygen, nitrogen-to-oxygen, neon-to-oxygen, sulfur-to-oxygen, argon-to-oxygen abundance ratios, the H-$\beta$ fraction of matter-bounded models, and the dust-to-metal mass ratio), and returns 14 emission-line ratios, the electron temperature, and the H-$\alpha$ luminosity. It predicts these quantities with roughly one percent (in dex) scatter, and runs a million predictions in under 0.2 seconds on one GPU. The composite-galaxy construction then draws H II regions from tunable distributions around a galactic baseline: oxygen abundance scatters by $\sigma_{\mathrm{O/H}} = 0.15$ dex, ionization parameter follows the inverse relation $\log U = -2.5 - [\log(\mathrm{O/H})+4]$ with a scatter of 0.5 dex, and regions are kept according to an H-$\alpha$ luminosity function with slope $\alpha_{\mathrm{LF}} = -1.9$. A separate network, the DIG-ANN, adds diffuse ionized gas photoionized by old low-mass evolved stars, and each region receives random dust attenuation before a global H-$\alpha$/H-$\beta$ correction is applied.

What would settle it

Compute integrated spectra for a set of galaxies both by summing measured individual H II region spectra and DIG and by running Cloudy directly on the same region populations; if the direct method on the integrated spectra does not reproduce the factor-of-several O/H deficits predicted at $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) > 8.5$ with large temperature spreads, the pipeline's distribution assumptions or its ANN interpolation in that metallicity range would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that compositeness itself produces a systematic error in direct-method oxygen abundances. When many H II regions with different physical conditions are summed, the integrated [O III] 4363/5007 and [N II] 5755/6584 ratios are not those of the average region: cold, metal-rich regions contribute most of the strong-line flux, while the faint auroral lines come disproportionately from hotter regions, so the derived electron temperature is biased upward and the derived O/H downward. In the 250,000 synthetic galaxies, this produces a small underestimation of about 0.05 dex at $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) < 7.5$ (from the neglect of O$^{3+}$), and a much larger underestimation at $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) > 8.5$, reaching factors of up to several. The most severe high-metallicity deficits occur in galaxies with the largest H-$\alpha$-weighted spread in electron temperature among their H II regions ($t^2 > 0.03$), supporting the idea that temperature fluctuations, not just a single-region temperature, govern the bias.

Load-bearing premise

The size and location of the reported bias rest on the assumed distributions of H II region properties inside real galaxies: the width of oxygen-abundance scatter, the inverse ionization-parameter relation, the spread parameters, and the H-alpha luminosity function slope, none of which are validated against observed composite spectra or direct Cloudy calculations of full galaxy spectra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Direct-method metallicity measurements of metal-rich star-forming galaxies should no longer be treated as unbiased estimates of the mean oxygen abundance; the composite nature of the galaxy pulls them low.
  • The effect predicts that galaxies with the largest internal temperature spread will show the largest negative offset between direct-method O/H and the H-alpha-weighted truth, a correlation observable with spatially resolved spectroscopy.
  • The ANN surrogate makes it practical to run fitting algorithms such as MCMC over millions of H II region models, opening parameter estimation for resolved regions and galaxies that was previously computationally prohibitive.
  • The synthetic sample lands in the observed regions of standard diagnostic diagrams such as BPT and VO87, so the model can be used to re-interpret line-ratio sequences in terms of underlying H II region populations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the high-metallicity bias applies to real galaxies, direct-method mass-metallicity relations may be too shallow at the metal-rich end, and part of the discrepancy between direct-method and strong-line abundances could trace to which galaxies have large temperature spreads.
  • A testable extension is to fit integrated lines with the same ANN in an inversion mode, recovering the H-alpha-weighted distribution of region temperatures and abundances rather than a single-region abundance; the paper's methodology supports this but does not attempt it.
  • The adopted inverse relation between ionization parameter and oxygen abundance is a key driver of where the bias appears; re-running the pipeline with a flat or positive log U-O/H relation, as some surveys report, would produce a different bias map and is a direct way to bound the model's assumptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a new method for modelling the integrated nebular emission of star-forming galaxies. A regression ANN is trained on approximately 800,000 Cloudy photoionization models of individual HII regions, predicts 16 output quantities (line ratios, electron temperature, H-alpha luminosity) from 13 input parameters, and is validated on a held-out test set. The ANN is then used to assemble 250,000 synthetic composite galaxies containing up to about 3000 HII regions each, with randomly drawn physical parameters, a prescribed H-alpha luminosity function, individual dust attenuation, and a diffuse ionized-gas component photoionized by HOLMES. The main scientific application is an assessment of the direct method for oxygen abundances: the authors find that direct-method O/H estimates can be biased low by about 0.05 dex at low metallicity and, more dramatically, can underestimate the true O/H by factors of up to several at high metallicity, with the largest deficits occurring in galaxies with the largest H-alpha-weighted electron-temperature spread among their constituent HII regions.

Significance. If the quantitative results are robust, the paper provides a fast and flexible tool for an important problem: modelling galaxy-scale nebular emission as a superposition of many HII regions rather than as a single representative region. The use of a held-out test set for the ANN, the generation of a very large public synthetic-galaxy sample, and the reproducibility-oriented release of scripts and trained networks are clear strengths. The qualitative conclusion that direct-method O/H estimates can be biased by temperature-spread effects is consistent with earlier work and is physically plausible. However, the headline quantitative claim of 'factors of up to several' at high metallicity is not yet demonstrated to be independent of the assumed distribution of HII-region properties, particularly the adopted inverse relation between ionization parameter and oxygen abundance. Because the paper presents this bias as a motivation for the new method, the robustness of that result needs to be established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.2 / Eq. (3)] The high-metallicity direct-method bias in Fig. 10 is computed from synthetic galaxies built with a single assumed relation between ionization parameter and oxygen abundance. Equation (3) sets log U = -2.5 - [12+log(O/H)-8] plus offsets, so at 12+log(O/H)=9 the baseline log U is -3.5, with sigma_U=0.5; this creates a low-U, low-Te population whose high-Te tail dominates the auroral [O III] 4363 flux. The paper's own Fig. 6 shows that changing the U-O/H relation, for instance to the positive relation of Ji & Yan (2022), substantially moves the models in line-ratio and Te-sensitive diagrams. No experiment in Section 5.2 varies the slope, sign, or scatter of Eq. (3). I therefore ask for a robustness test: recompute the bias map of Fig. 10 for at least a few alternative U-O/H relations (including the positive relation shown in Fig. 6 and a flat relation) and state explicitly how the 'factors of up to several' change. Without such a test, the quantitative magnitude of the high-metallicity bias is a property of the assumed input distribution rather than a demonstrated property of real galaxies.
  2. [Section 3.2 / Fig. 2] The ANN test error grows toward high oxygen abundance: Fig. 2 shows visibly increasing 5th-95th percentile spreads for 12+log(O/H) > 9, and the text in Section 3.2 acknowledges that the regression model 'starts to lose accuracy' there. This is exactly the regime in which Fig. 10 reports the largest direct-method bias. The paper quotes global standard deviations of 0.01-0.02 dex for the BPT-filtered test set, but it does not propagate the per-region ANN errors through the galaxy-integration procedure into the derived O/H bias. At minimum, the authors should quantify the contribution of ANN interpolation error to the high-metallicity tail of Fig. 10; for example, by Monte Carlo perturbing the ANN outputs by their O/H-dependent error distribution and recomputing the bias map, or by comparing a sample of integrated synthetic galaxies built from ANN predictions against the same galaxies built directly from the underlying Cloudy models.
  3. [Section 4.2 / Section 5.2] The entire synthetic-galaxy pipeline is validated only at the level of individual HII regions against Cloudy, and in aggregate against observed diagnostic diagrams. There is no direct validation of the integrated composite spectra: no test shows that summing the emission of many Cloudy HII regions with the same parameter distributions and then applying the PyNeb direct method reproduces the integrated line ratios and O/H offsets claimed in Fig. 10. I request a direct comparison for a small subset of galaxies (e.g. a few dozen) in which the full set of constituent HII regions is run with Cloudy, the emission is summed in the same way, and the direct-method O/H is compared with the ANN-based result. This would simultaneously test the ANN systematics at high O/H and the integration procedure, and it would make the bias claim independent of emulation error.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 3] The row for log(Ne/O) gives the description as 'N/O abundance ratio'; this should be 'Ne/O abundance ratio'.
  2. [Section 5.1] In the discussion of the C/O distribution, the text reads 'corresponding to -3.7 <~ 12+log(O/H) <~ 3.0'; the upper limit should presumably be 9.0 rather than 3.0.
  3. [Fig. 7 / Section 4.2] The text in Section 4.2 states that the example galaxy shown in Fig. 7 contains 1616 HII regions, while the Fig. 7 caption says 2002 HII regions; these numbers should be reconciled.
  4. [Section 6] In the summary, 'generic algorithms' should be 'genetic algorithms'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the direct-method bias is an emergent property of the synthetic-galaxy construction, and the ANN is validated on a held-out test set.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: a Cloudy model grid -> a regression ANN emulator (validated on a 20% held-out test set, with standard deviations below ~0.02 dex per Table A1 and Fig. 2) -> 250,000 synthetic composite galaxies built by summing individual HII regions with tunable parameter distributions -> a direct-method O/H bias quantified in Fig. 10. No step reduces a claimed result to an input by construction. The high-metallicity direct-method underestimate is an emergent property of summing many HII regions with different electron temperatures: the integrated auroral-line flux is dominated by the high-T_e tail, whereas the 'true' H-alpha-weighted O/H is computed from input abundances, so the bias is not a restatement of Eq. (3) or of any fitted parameter. The ANN is not fitted to the bias; its target outputs are Cloudy line ratios, and the bias appears only after the synthetic-galaxy summation and the independent PyNeb two-zone direct-method analysis. Equation (3) is an assumed input relation, explicitly attributed to Carton et al. (2017), and the paper itself displays the alternative positive U-O/H relation of Ji & Yan (2022) in Fig. 6, so the assumption is not smuggled in through self-citation. The many self-references (3MdB, PyNeb, AI4Neb, pyCloudy) are software tools or databases rather than load-bearing uniqueness claims. The paper also labels its results 'primarily illustrative' in Section 6, dampening any claim that the quantitative bias map is a universal prediction. The only caveats are robustness/sensitivity concerns rather than circularity: the assumed U-O/H relation and spread parameters in Table 3 are not directly validated against observations, and Fig. 2 shows the ANN loses accuracy at 12+log(O/H) near and above 9, which overlaps the highest-metallicity tail of Fig. 10. These concerns affect the strength of the quantitative claim, but they do not make any equation in the paper equivalent to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central bias result rests on the assumed distributions of HII-region parameters and the accuracy of the ANN emulator; these are either chosen by hand or inherited from prior literature. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters listed are the hand-chosen spreads and normalizations that directly shape the synthetic galaxy population.

free parameters (7)
  • delta(O/H) galaxy baseline spread = 1.2 dex (chosen)
    Sets the range of baseline galactic 12+log(O/H) via eq. (1); not fitted to data.
  • sigma(O/H) HII-region spread = 0.15 dex (chosen)
    Controls the O/H dispersion of regions within a galaxy (eq. 2), directly affecting the H-alpha-weighted true abundance and the temperature spread.
  • log U canonical normalization and slope = -2.5 at 12+log(O/H)=8, slope -1 (eq. 3)
    The assumed inverse relation between ionization parameter and O/H determines which regions dominate integrated emission and the low-metallicity O3+ bias.
  • sigma_U ionization parameter spread = 0.5 dex (chosen)
    Spread of U among HII regions; influences scatter in line ratios and Te fluctuations.
  • alpha_LF H-alpha luminosity function slope = -1.9 (adopted from Rousseau-Nepton et al. 2018; Santoro et al. 2022)
    Determines which HII regions enter the galaxy emission budget (eq. 6); adopted from observations, not fitted here.
  • delta(X/O) and sigma(X/O) abundance ratio spreads = 0.3 and 0.2 dex (chosen)
    Per-galaxy and per-region scatter in C/O, N/O, S/O, Ne/O, Ar/O, affecting line ratios used in the direct method.
  • DIGFrac diffuse ionized gas fraction = uniform in [0, 0.4] (chosen)
    Fraction of DIG added to each galaxy; affects integrated auroral-to-nebular ratios and thus the direct-method bias.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cloudy v17.03 photoionization code computes accurate emission-line luminosities for HII regions across the drawn parameter space.
    All individual HII-region line fluxes come from Cloudy models; if Cloudy atomic physics is inaccurate, the synthetic galaxies and the bias test inherit those errors.
  • domain assumption BPASS v2.23 binary stellar population models provide reliable ionizing spectra.
    The ionizing SEDs determine the ionization balance and line ratios; adoption is from prior literature, not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Nicholls et al. (2017) abundance relations and Dopita et al. (2013) depletion factors describe real metal abundances.
    Used to draw total abundances and gas-phase depletion; if these relations are wrong, the region-to-region abundance patterns in synthetic galaxies are unrealistic.
  • domain assumption ANN interpolation errors are small enough not to change the integrated line ratios and the derived bias.
    The paper shows small test-set errors inside a BPT triangle but does not validate composite galaxy predictions against direct Cloudy runs; at high O/H the ANN is acknowledged to lose accuracy.
  • ad hoc to paper Diffuse ionized gas is entirely produced by HOLMES, with no contribution from HII-region photon leakage.
    The authors explicitly exclude leakage and cite Lugo-Aranda et al. 2024 noting it may dominate in some star-forming galaxies; this simplification could affect DIG line ratios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nebular emission from composite star-forming galaxies -- I. A novel modelling approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZHK5GKWP

@misc{pith2026250105424,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nebular emission from composite star-forming galaxies -- I. A novel modelling approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZHK5GKWP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05424}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a novel approach to modelling the nebular emission from star-forming galaxies by combining the contributions from many HII regions incorporating loose trends in physical properties, random dust attenuation, a predefined Halpha luminosity function and a diffuse ionized-gas component. Using a machine-learning-based regression artificial neural network trained on a grid of models generated by the photoionization code Cloudy, we efficiently predict emission-line properties of individual HII regions over a wide range of physical conditions. We generate 250,000 synthetic star-forming galaxies composed of up to 3000 HII regions and explore how variations in parameters affect their integrated emission-line properties. Our results highlight systematic biases in oxygen-abundance estimates derived using traditional methods, emphasizing the importance of accounting for the composite nature of star-forming galaxies when interpreting integrated nebular emission. Future work will leverage this approach to explore in detail its impact on parameter estimates of star-forming galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05424 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distributions of selected input parameters of one million CLOUDY models with 𝑡c < 7 Myr and H𝛽Frac > 0.65 produced using the distributions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Density maps of the difference between true and ANN-predicted values (both in logarithm) of 14 emission-line ratios, the electronic temperature and the absolute H𝛼 luminosity, plotted against 12 + log (O/H), for the 20 per cent of models from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Analogue of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: True (stars) and predicted (circles) line ratios in the [O iii]𝜆5007/H𝛽-versus-[N ii]𝜆6584/H𝛼 (BPT) diagram, for a random subset of 40 models from the sample shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Properties of 10,000 regression-ANN models with both N/O and 𝑈 tied to O/H (according to the relations shown in the leftmost panels) in six dia￾grams: the [O iii]𝜆5007/H𝛽-versus-[N ii]𝜆6584/H𝛼 (BPT) diagram; the [O iii]𝜆5007/H𝛽-versus-[S ii]𝜆6725/H𝛼 and [O iii]𝜆5007/H𝛽…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The top eight panels show the analogue of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distributions of individual parameters of the 2002 H ii regions constituting one of the composite star-forming galaxies built as described in Section 4.1 (the meaning of the different parameters is described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distributions of various properties of the 250,000 composite star-forming galaxies built as described in Section 4 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of the 250,000 composite star-forming galaxies of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of the logarithmic difference between O/H de￾rived from the direct method and true, H𝛼-weighted O/H as a function of 12 + log (O/H), for the subset of 207,750 composite star-forming galaxies of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. End-to-end differentiable retrieval of molecular spectra using hydrodynamics, chemistry, and radiative transfer

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An end-to-end differentiable JAX pipeline couples 1D hydrodynamics, time-dependent chemistry, and radiative transfer, and recovers shock and rate parameters from synthetic HCO+ spectra.

  2. Recovering the properties of the interstellar medium through integrated spectroscopy: application to the z~0 ECO volume-limited star-forming galaxy sample

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Integrated optical spectra of 2052 ECO star-forming galaxies, modeled as superpositions of many H II regions, reveal low-excitation gas with average metallicity near 0.3 solar and a mass-metallicity relation consisten...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abadi M., et al., 2015, TensorFlow : Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems

    2015

  2. [2]

    H., Liller W., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146695 , 130, 45

    Aller L. H., Liller W., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146695 , 130, 45

    work page doi:10.1086/146695 1959

  3. [3]

    Alloin D., Collin-Souffrin S., Joly M., Vigroux L., 1979, , 78, 200

    1979

  4. [4]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  5. [5]

    E., et al., 2022, , 926, 161

    Backhaus B. E., et al., 2022, , 926, 161

    2022

  6. [6]

    Badenas-Agusti M., Via \ n a J., Vanderburg A., Blouin S., Dufour P., Xu S., Sha L., 2024, , 529, 1688

    2024

  7. [7]

    M., Terlevich R., 1981, , 93, 817

    Baldwin A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, , 93, 817

    1981

  8. [8]

    arXiv:1904.07248

    Baron D., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1904.07248

    arXiv 2019

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    aosabook.org

    Bayer M., 2012, in Brown A., Wilson G., eds, , The Architecture of Open Source Applications Volume II: Structure, Scale, and a Few More Fearless Hacks. aosabook.org

    2012

  2. [10]

    K., Peiris H

    Bird S., Rogers K. K., Peiris H. V., Verde L., Font-Ribera A., Pontzen A., 2019, , 2019, 050

    2019

  3. [11]

    Bron E., et al., 2021, , 645, A28

    2021

  4. [12]

    J., Conroy C., Johnson B

    Byler N., Dalcanton J. J., Conroy C., Johnson B. D., Levesque E. M., Berg D. A., 2018, , 863, 14

    2018

  5. [13]

    M., Stanway E

    Byrne C. M., Stanway E. R., Eldridge J. J., McSwiney L., Townsend O. T., 2022, , 512, 5329

    2022

  6. [14]

    J., Katz H., Rey M

    Cameron A. J., Katz H., Rey M. P., 2023, , 522, L89

    2023

  7. [15]

    Carton D., et al., 2017, , 468, 2140

    2017

  8. [16]

    Chabrier G., 2003, , 586, L133

    2003

  9. [17]

    Charlot S., Longhetti M., 2001, , 323, 887

    2001

  10. [18]

    Cormier D., et al., 2019, , 626, A23

    2019

  11. [19]

    DeRose J., Chen S.-F., White M., Kokron N., 2022, , 2022, 056

    2022

  12. [20]

    A., Sutherland R

    Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Nicholls D. C., Kewley L. J., Vogt F. P. A., 2013, , 208, 10

    2013

  13. [21]

    J., Stanway E

    Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., Xiao L., McClelland L. A. S., Taylor G., Ng M., Greis S. M. L., Bray J. C., 2017, , 34, e058

    2017

  14. [22]

    J., et al., 2017, , 53, 385

    Ferland G. J., et al., 2017, , 53, 385

    2017

  15. [23]

    L., 1999, , 111, 63

    Fitzpatrick E. L., 1999, , 111, 63

    1999

  16. [24]

    Flores-Fajardo N., Morisset C., Stasi \'n ska G., Binette L., 2011, , 415, 2182

    2011

  17. [25]

    Froese Fischer C., Tachiev G., 2004, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 87, 1

    2004

  18. [26]

    Galliano F., 2018, , 476, 1445

    2018

  19. [27]

    G \'o mez-Llanos V., Morisset C., Garc \' a-Rojas J., Jones D., Wesson R., Corradi R. L. M., Boffin H. M. J., 2020, , 498, L82

    2020

  20. [28]

    P., Bovino S., Picogna G., Ercolano B., 2022, , 668, A139

    Grassi T., Nauman F., Ramsey J. P., Bovino S., Picogna G., Ercolano B., 2022, , 668, A139

    2022

  21. [29]

    Gutkin J., Charlot S., Bruzual G., 2016, , 462, 1757

    2016

  22. [30]

    R., et al., 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  23. [31]

    M., et al., 2011, , 730, 5

    Heckman T. M., et al., 2011, , 730, 5

    2011

  24. [32]

    arXiv:1606.08415

    Hendrycks D., Gimpel K., 2016, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1606.08415

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    S., Choi E., 2019, , 487, 333

    Hirschmann M., Charlot S., Feltre A., Naab T., Somerville R. S., Choi E., 2019, , 487, 333

    2019

  26. [34]

    T., 2019, , 485, 3569

    Ho I. T., 2019, , 485, 3569

    2019

  27. [35]

    J., Ilee J

    Holdship J., Viti S., Haworth T. J., Ilee J. D., 2021, , 653, A76

    2021

  28. [36]

    Hu W., et al., 2024, , 971, 21

    2024

  29. [37]

    D., 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  30. [38]

    B., Strom K

    Jensen E. B., Strom K. M., Strom S. E., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154773 , 209, 748

    1976 doi

  31. [39]

    Ji X., Yan R., 2022, , 659, A112

    2022

  32. [40]

    Katz H., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2657 , 518, 592

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, , 346, 1055

    2003

  34. [42]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., 2002, , 142, 35

    2002

  35. [43]

    J., Ellison S

    Kewley L. J., Ellison S. L., 2008, , 681, 1183

    2008

  36. [44]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001, , 556, 121

    2001

  37. [45]

    C., Sutherland R

    Kewley L., Nicholls D. C., Sutherland R. S., 2019, Understanding Galaxy Evolution Through Emission Lines, 57, 511

    2019

  38. [46]

    P., Ba J., 2014, arXiv e-prints, p

    Kingma D. P., Ba J., 2014, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    J., Ferland G

    Kisielius R., Storey P. J., Ferland G. J., Keenan F. P., 2009, , 397, 903

    2009

  40. [48]

    P., Ferland G

    Kisielius R., Kulkarni V. P., Ferland G. J., Bogdanovich P., Lykins M. L., 2014, , 780, 76

    2014

  41. [49]

    A., Kennicutt Jr

    Kobulnicky H. A., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., Pizagno J. L., 1999, , 514, 544

    1999

  42. [50]

    Korobov A., 1959, in Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. pp 1207--1210

    1959

  43. [51]

    Lecroq M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3838 , 527, 9480

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    D., Tacchella S., Davies R., Belli S., Park M., Emami R., 2024, arXiv e-prints, p

    Li Y., Leja J., Johnson B. D., Tacchella S., Davies R., Belli S., Park M., Emami R., 2024, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2405.04598

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Liu D., Nocedal J., 1989, Mathematical Programming, 45, 503

    1989

  46. [54]

    Z., S \'a nchez S

    Lugo-Aranda A. Z., S \'a nchez S. F., Barrera-Ballesteros J. K., L \'o pez-Cob \'a C., Espinosa-Ponce C., Galbany L., Anderson J. P., 2024, , 528, 6099

    2024

  47. [55]

    A., 2015, , 573, A42

    Luridiana V., Morisset C., Shaw R. A., 2015, , 573, A42

    2015

  48. [56]

    Maltsev K., Schneider F. R. N., R \"o pke F. K., Jordan A. I., Qadir G. A., Kerzendorf W. E., Riedmiller K., van der Smagt P., 2024, , 681, A86

    2024

  49. [57]

    A., et al., 2013, , 559, A114

    Marino R. A., et al., 2013, , 559, A114

    2013

  50. [58]

    Mart \' nez-Paredes M., Bruzual G., Morisset C., Kim M., Mel \'e ndez M., Binette L., 2023, , 525, 2916

    2023

  51. [59]

    Mast D., et al., 2014, , 561, A129

    2014

  52. [60]

    McClymont W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1587 , 532, 2016

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    S., 1991, , 380, 140

    McGaugh S. S., 1991, , 380, 140

    1991

  54. [62]

    H., Heavens A

    Mootoovaloo A., Jaffe A. H., Heavens A. F., Leclercq F., 2022, Astronomy and Computing, 38, 100508

    2022

  55. [63]

    Edited by C

    Morisset C., 2014, in Asymmetrical Planetary Nebulae VI conference, Proceedings of the conference held 4-8 November, 2013. Edited by C. Morisset, G. Delgado-Inglada and S. Torres-Peimbert

    2014

  56. [64]

    Morisset C., Delgado-Inglada G., Flores-Fajardo N., 2015, , 51, 103

    2015

  57. [65]

    Morisset C., et al., 2016, , 594, A37

    2016

  58. [66]

    Morisset C., Luridiana V., Garc \' a-Rojas J., G \'o mez-Llanos V., Bautista M., Mendoza C., 2020, Atoms, 8, 66

    2020

  59. [67]

    C., Sutherland R

    Nicholls D. C., Sutherland R. S., Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Groves B. A., 2017, , 466, 4403

    2017

  60. [68]

    E., Ferland G

    Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  61. [69]

    Pagel B. E. J., Edmunds M. G., Blackwell D. E., Chun M. S., Smith G., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/189.1.95 , 189, 95

    1979 doi

  62. [70]

    Palud P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347074 , 678, A198

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    Pedregosa F., et al., 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  64. [72]

    Peimbert M., 1967, , 150, 825

    1967

  65. [73]

    Peimbert M., Costero R., 1969, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 5, 3

    1969

  66. [74]

    P \'e rez-Montero E., 2017, , 129, 043001

    2017

  67. [75]

    K., Bizyaev D., 2023, arXiv e-prints, p

    Postnikova V. K., Bizyaev D., 2023, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2307.01544

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Ramambason L., et al., 2022, , 667, A35

    2022

  69. [77]

    Ramirez S., Icaza-Lizaola M., Fromenteau S., Vargas-Maga \ n a M., Aviles A., 2024, , 2024, 049

    2024

  70. [78]

    Rautio R. P. V., Watkins A. E., Comer \'o n S., Salo H., D \' az-Garc \' a S., Janz J., 2022, , 659, A153

    2022

  71. [79]

    Reza M., Zhang Y., Nord B., Poh J., Ciprijanovic A., Strigari L., 2022, in Machine Learning for Astrophysics. p. 20

    2022

  72. [80]

    P., Drissen L., Martin T., 2018, , 477, 4152

    Rousseau-Nepton L., Robert C., Martin R. P., Drissen L., Martin T., 2018, , 477, 4152

    2018

  73. [81]

    L., Shapley A

    Sanders R. L., Shapley A. E., Zhang K., Yan R., 2017, , 850, 136

    2017

  74. [82]

    Santoro F., et al., 2022, , 658, A188

    2022

  75. [83]

    L., Tremonti C., Belfiore F., Pace Z., Bershady M

    Schaefer A. L., Tremonti C., Belfiore F., Pace Z., Bershady M. A., Andrews B. H., Drory N., 2020, , 890, L3

    2020

  76. [84]

    I., 2019, , 622, L10

    Schaerer D., Fragos T., Izotov Y. I., 2019, , 622, L10

    2019

  77. [85]

    P., Mirocha J., Reines A

    Senchyna P., Stark D. P., Mirocha J., Reines A. E., Charlot S., Jones T., Mulchaey J. S., 2020, , 494, 941

    2020

  78. [86]

    V., Molyarova T., Semenov D

    Smirnov-Pinchukov G. V., Molyarova T., Semenov D. A., Akimkin V. V., van Terwisga S., Francheschi R., Henning T., 2022, , 666, L8

    2022

  79. [87]

    R., Eldridge J

    Stanway E. R., Eldridge J. J., 2018, , 479, 75

    2018

  80. [88]

    Stasi \'n ska G., 2005, , 434, 507

    2005

  81. [89]

    arXiv:1906.04520

    Stasinska G., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1906.04520

    2019 arXiv

  82. [90]

    V., 2006, , 371, 972

    Stasi \'n ska G., Cid Fernandes R., Mateus A., Sodr \'e L., Asari N. V., 2006, , 371, 972

    2006

  83. [91]

    Stasi \'n ska G., Izotov Y., Morisset C., Guseva N., 2015, , 576, A83

    2015

  84. [92]

    J., Sochi T., Badnell N

    Storey P. J., Sochi T., Badnell N. R., 2014, , 441, 3028

    2014

  85. [93]

    Tachiev G., Froese Fischer C., 2001, Canadian Journal of Physics, 79, 955

    2001

  86. [94]

    S., 2011, , 195, 12

    Tayal S. S., 2011, , 195, 12

    2011

  87. [95]

    S., Zatsarinny O., 2010, , 188, 32

    Tayal S. S., Zatsarinny O., 2010, , 188, 32

    2010

  88. [96]

    The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, preprint

    2013

  89. [97]

    R., et al., 2023, , 945, 35

    Trump J. R., et al., 2023, , 945, 35

    2023

  90. [98]

    Umeda H., Ouchi M., Nakajima K., Isobe Y., Aoyama S., Harikane Y., Ono Y., Matsumoto A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac602d , 930, 37

    2022 doi

  91. [99]

    Vale Asari N., Stasi \'n ska G., Morisset C., Cid Fernandes R., 2016, , 460, 1739

    2016

  92. [100]

    E., 1987, , 63, 295

    Veilleux S., Osterbrock D. E., 1987, , 63, 295

    1987

  93. [101]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  94. [102]

    pp 56 -- 61

    W es M c K inney 2010, in S t\'efan van der W alt J arrod M illman eds, P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference. pp 56 -- 61

    2010

  95. [103]

    F., Boada S., 2019, , 484, 4683

    Wu J. F., Boada S., 2019, , 484, 4683

    2019

  96. [104]

    R., et al., 2015, , 798, 29

    Zeimann G. R., et al., 2015, , 798, 29

    2015

  97. [105]

    pandas development team T., 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.