Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 70 references

High-efficiency, high-count-rate 2D superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 64-pixel superconducting nanowire detector array reaches 77.7% per-pixel efficiency at 1550 nm with 645 Mcps count rate.

desk verdict Solid engineering paper with a usable 64-pixel SNSPD camera, but the per-pixel efficiency uniformity claim is weaker than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07357 v1 pith:URKOCD4D submitted 2025-01-13 quant-ph physics.ins-detphysics.optics

Fiona Fleming , Will McCutcheon , Emma E. Wollman , Andrew D. Beyer , Vikas Anant , Boris Korzh , Jason P. Allmaras , Lautaro Narváez
show 4 more authors
Saroch Leedumrongwatthanakun Gerald S. Buller Mehul Malik Matthew D. Shaw
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.ins-detphysics.optics
keywords superconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectorSNSPDarrayimagingSWIRdetectionphotonefficiencytimingjittermaximumcountratedirectreadout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates a self-contained 64-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) array for the short-wave infrared, claiming record-class performance across all key metrics at once: an average per-pixel photon detection efficiency of 77.7% at 1550 nm, a system detection efficiency of 65%, 20 dark counts per second per pixel, 100 ps timing jitter, a 3-dB maximum count rate of 645 Mcps, and no detectable crosstalk at the 0.1% level. The authors argue that direct readout, with one coaxial cable per pixel, is the practical path to simultaneously high efficiency, count rate, and low jitter at this pixel count. If the numbers hold, the system is a record-class SWIR single-photon camera and a ready platform for high-dimensional quantum photonics, LiDAR, and photon-starved imaging.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SNSPD array itself: 64 NbTiN nanowire pixels, each meandered over a roughly 27.5 by 27.8 micron active area on a 30 micron pitch, giving an 80 to 85 percent fill factor, with a gold back mirror and anti-reflection coating forming a low-quality-factor optical cavity at 1550 nm to boost absorption. The array is read out directly, one coaxial cable per pixel, with cryogenic amplifiers at 40 K and a 64-channel time-to-digital converter; the direct-readout architecture is the mechanism that avoids the count-rate and multi-photon tradeoffs of multiplexed arrays. The key identity in the efficiency measurement is $\text{SPDE} = (R_{\text{counts}} - R_{\text{dcr}})/R_{\text{input}}$, though the authors use the total array count rate for $R_{\text{counts}}$ rather than per-pixel counts.

What would settle it

Re-measure the single-photon detection efficiency of each pixel using that pixel's own count rate, with the focused spot contained within the pixel, and compare the per-pixel distribution to the claimed 77.7% average and 0.6% standard deviation; a discrepancy larger than the stated error bars would invalidate the uniform per-pixel efficiency claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors report the fabrication and full characterisation of an 8x8 array of 27.5x27.8 micron NbTiN nanowire pixels on a 30 micron pitch, with a gold back mirror and bilayer anti-reflection coating forming a low-finesse cavity centred at 1550 nm. They measure a mean per-pixel single-photon detection efficiency of 77.7% with a standard deviation of 0.6%, a maximum system detection efficiency of 65%, an average dark count rate of about 20 counts per second per pixel, per-pixel timing jitter around 100 ps FWHM, a 3-dB maximum count rate of about 645 Mcps for the array, and inter-pixel crosstalk constrained below 0.1%. They conclude this is the most optimally performing time-correlated single-photon counting imaging SNSPD array to date in the SWIR, and that the direct-readout architecture is what allows all parameters to remain high simultaneously.

Load-bearing premise

The reported per-pixel efficiency claims assume that using the total array count rate in place of each pixel's own count rate faithfully represents individual pixel performance; if per-pixel counting were used, the 77.7% average and 0.6% uniformity might differ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An SWIR single-photon camera with roughly 78% per-pixel efficiency and about 100 ps timing resolution would enable single-shot multi-spatial-mode measurements for high-dimensional quantum key distribution and entanglement certification.
  • The 645 Mcps array count rate, about 8 to 11 Mcps per pixel, is sufficient for fast-acquisition single-photon LiDAR and high-data-rate optical communication, and it exceeds multiplexed arrays by orders of magnitude, as the 400,000-pixel camera runs at roughly 10 kcps.
  • The measured 65% system detection efficiency, given the 80 to 85% fill factor and window and filter losses, implies the per-pixel internal detection efficiency is near the 77.7% level and that residual losses are mostly geometric and optical.
  • The absence of crosstalk at the 0.1% level over a 10 ns correlation window means the array can be used for coincidence-based quantum measurements without corrections for correlated noise.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the per-pixel efficiency is computed from the total array count rate, the reported 0.6% uniformity may partly reflect the constancy of the total count rate rather than true pixel-to-pixel variation; a genuine per-pixel measurement could reveal a larger spread that matters for imaging uniformity.
  • The same pixel design scaled to smaller pixels would trade fill factor for higher per-pixel count rate and lower geometric jitter, suggesting a design family where pixel size is chosen to match the application's required frame rate and timing precision.
  • The rack-mounted, self-contained cryostat and direct-readout electronics make this a turnkey detector; a natural next step is to connect it to a multi-plane light converter or complex-medium circuit to perform projective measurements on high-dimensional spatial modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: The authors report the fabrication and full characterisation of an 8x8 array of 27.5x27.8 micron NbTiN nanowire pixels on a 30 micron pitch, with a gold back mirror and bilayer anti-reflection coating forming a low-finesse cavity centred at 1550 nm. They measure a mean per-pixel single-photon detection efficiency of 77.7% with a standard deviation of 0.6%, a maximum system detection efficiency of

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a rack-mounted, direct-readout 64-pixel NbTiN superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array operating at 920 mK, with each pixel read out through a 64-channel time-to-digital converter. The authors claim an average per-pixel photon detection efficiency of 77.7% with a standard deviation of ±0.6% at 1550 nm, a system detection efficiency (SDE) of 65%, a dark count rate of ~20 cps per pixel, a per-pixel FWHM jitter of ~100 ps, a 3-dB maximum count rate of 645 Mcps, and no evidence of crosstalk at the 0.1% level. The central claim is that this is the highest-performing time-correlated single-photon counting SWIR imaging array for this pixel count.

Significance. If the per-pixel efficiency claim is properly supported, this system is a notable advance for SWIR single-photon imaging: it combines high system efficiency with high per-pixel count rates, low dark counts, and low crosstalk in a self-contained apparatus. The paper's strengths include direct experimental characterization with stated power-meter uncertainty, a detailed description of the cryogenic and optical setup, and a useful comparison with commercial 36-pixel direct-readout arrays. However, the headline per-pixel efficiency and uniformity numbers are not justified by the measurement as described, which materially weakens the central claim and needs to be addressed before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3, Fig. 2b] The per-pixel SPDE values are computed from the total array count rate R_counts, as the text explicitly states: 'R_counts is taken as the total array count rate rather than the count rate measured for each individual pixel.' Therefore the 77.7% average and σ=±0.6% describe the array-level response when the focused spot is centered at each pixel, not the intrinsic detection efficiency of each pixel. Counts from neighboring pixels, inter-pixel wiring, and any other pixels intercepting the ~27 µm Gaussian tails are included in the numerator for every pixel, so the measurement cannot detect a dead or inefficient pixel that is masked by its neighbors. The conclusion that 'all 64 pixels achieving a maximum SPDE in the range 76.2–79.2%' is not supported by the described measurement. Please reanalyze the data using per-pixel counts from the 64-channel TDC, or alternatively revise the abstract and conclusion to state 'array-level efficiency when the spot is centered on each pixel' and remove the per-pixel uniformity claim.
  2. [Sec. 3, Fig. 2b caption] The paper reports a per-measurement error of approximately ±5% from power-meter uncertainty and spot-alignment error, yet claims a uniformity spread of only ±0.6% standard deviation and all values within about 3%. Under this stated error budget, the observed pixel-to-pixel differences are not statistically significant. The uniformity claim should either be supported by a proper uncertainty propagation that separates common-mode systematic error from pixel-to-pixel variation, or be presented as a reproducibility check of the array-level measurement rather than as evidence of per-pixel uniformity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3, Crosstalk] The crosstalk discussion refers to Figures 4, 5, and 6 inconsistently (e.g., 'as shown in Fig. 6' followed by 'In Fig. 4' and 'As seen in Fig. 5'); please renumber the figures and ensure all citations point to the correct panels.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'the highlighted red and blue lines represent thefrom 2 individual pixels' should read 'represent two individual pixels'.
  3. [Sec. 2, Optical setup] The text describes a '50/50 beamsplitter' but Fig. 1c labels a '45:55 Beamsplitter'; please make the split ratio consistent between text and figure.
  4. [Sec. 3, SDE measurement] The array SDE of 65% is the maximum over the spot sizes shown in Fig. 2c; the abstract's phrase 'the observed system detection efficiency (SDE) across the entire array was 65%' would be clearer if it stated that this is the maximum value obtained with an optimized, expanded spot and that the SDE varies with illumination size.
  5. [Supplemental document] The supplemental document contains a typo: 'crysostat' should be 'cryostat'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity found: the reported efficiencies, dark counts, jitter, count-rate, and crosstalk figures are measured directly, and the only caveat is the disclosed aggregate-rate method for per-pixel SPDE, which is a measurement limitation rather than a circular argument.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization, not a derivation, so the circularity patterns of fitted inputs renamed as predictions, self-cited uniqueness theorems, or ansatz-by-citation do not apply. The headline numbers are measured quantities: SDE is computed as (R_counts − R_dcr)/R_input, jitter is the FWHM of measured histograms, the MCR is taken at the 3-dB compression point, and crosstalk is assessed against a zero-crosstalk Poisson model. The one caveat is exactly what the authors disclose in Sec. 3 and the Fig. 2b description: “R_counts is taken as the total array count rate rather than the count rate measured for each individual pixel… the laser spot overfills each pixel.” Thus the 77.7% “per-pixel” SPDE and σ = ±0.6% are aggregate, spot-centered array responses rather than isolated single-pixel efficiencies. This weakens the semantic claim of per-pixel measurement, but it is not circular: no target quantity is used as an input to produce itself, and the aggregate-count choice is a stated measurement assumption, not a fitted parameter. Likewise, the 65% SDE is the maximum over several spot sizes (“the maximum value of 65% being recorded for the spot size shown”), i.e., selection rather than circularity. Self-citations are contextual (e.g., refs. 6, 11, 51) and none is load-bearing. Bias-current and comparator-threshold choices are operational settings, not fitted values. Overall, no derivation reduces to its inputs; the score of 1 only flags the disclosed per-pixel measurement limitation, which does not rise to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental device demonstration; it does not introduce new physical entities or a parametric model fitted to the target results. The only hand-chosen settings are the operating bias, comparator thresholds, and spot size used for the headline efficiency, all of which influence the reported numbers.

free parameters (3)
  • Nominal bias current = 21 µA
    Chosen from the measured PCR and DCR versus bias curves (Fig. 2a) to maximize efficiency while keeping dark counts at 20 cps per pixel; all reported performance numbers are measured at this operating point.
  • Per-pixel comparator thresholds = not stated
    The jitter measurement section notes the TDC comparator threshold for each pixel was chosen to minimize jitter; the values are not reported, so the jitter result includes an optimized, undisclosed setting.
  • Spot size for maximum SDE = not quantified
    The reported 65% system detection efficiency is the maximum over several defocused spot sizes shown in Fig. 2c; the spot size and power distribution for the maximum are not specified.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption SNSPD hotspot model
    The operation and pulse generation rely on the standard hotspot formation model for superconducting nanowire single-photon detection, used throughout Sections 1 and 3.
  • domain assumption Poisson statistics for uncorrelated channels
    The crosstalk analysis in Fig. 4 assumes that counts from independent channels follow independent Poisson processes, so any deviation from the exponential inter-arrival distribution would indicate crosstalk.
  • domain assumption Power-meter calibration accuracy
    Input photon flux is measured with a free-space power meter with stated ±5% uncertainty; all efficiency values inherit this calibration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-efficiency, high-count-rate 2D superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URKOCD4D

@misc{pith2026250107357,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-efficiency, high-count-rate 2D superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URKOCD4D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07357}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) are the current leading technology for the detection of single-photons in the near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectral regions, due to record performance in terms of detection efficiency, low dark count rate, minimal timing jitter, and high maximum count rates. The various geometry and design parameters of SNSPDs are often carefully tailored to specific applications, resulting in challenges in optimising each performance characteristic without adversely impacting others. In particular, when scaling to larger array formats, the key challenge is to manage the heat load generated by the many readout cables in the cryogenic cooling system. Here we demonstrate a practical, self-contained 64-pixel SNSPD array system which exhibits high performance of all operational parameters, for use in the strategically important SWIR spectral region. The detector is an 8x8 array of 27.5 x 27.8 {\mu}m pixels on a 30 {\mu}m pitch, which leads to an 80 -- 85% fill factor. At a wavelength of 1550nm, a uniform average per-pixel photon detection efficiency of 77.7% was measured and the observed system detection efficiency (SDE) across the entire array was 65%. A full performance characterisation is presented, including a dark count rate of 20 cps per pixel, full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) jitter of 100 ps per pixel, a 3-dB maximum count rate of 645 Mcps and no evidence of crosstalk at the 0.1% level. This camera system therefore facilitates a variety of picosecond time-resolved measurement-based applications that include biomedical imaging, quantum communications, and long-range single-photon light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and 3D imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07357 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the optical alignment and imaging system for the 64-pixel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Graph of normalised photon count rate (red) and dark count rate (black) as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Normalised efficiency of the 64 pixel SNSPD array versus measured count [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Probability of detecting an event on Channel 13 following an event on Channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Photograph of rack containing the SNSPD camera cryostat, cryogenic control [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Lowered cryostat housing and rack-mounted lowering mechanism. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Crysostat internal components including the cryogenic amplifiers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SNSPD array and chip carrier mounted onto the cryostat 1K stage with the final [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SNSPD array packaged in a pin grid array (PGA) chip carrier. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications,

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. Chang, J. W. N. Los,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 190502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Long-range depth imaging with 13ps temporal resolution using a superconducting nanowire singlephoton detector,

    G. G. Taylor, A. McCarthy, B. Korzh,et al., “Long-range depth imaging with 13ps temporal resolution using a superconducting nanowire singlephoton detector,” inConference on Lasers and Electro-Optics,(Optica Publishing Group, 2020), p. SM2M.6

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single-photon detection,

    A. McCarthy, N. J. Krichel, N. R. Gemmell,et al., “Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single-photon detection,” Opt. Express21, 8904–8915 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing,

    R. H. Hadfield, J. Leach, F. Fleming,et al., “Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing,” Optica10, 1124–1141 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Krenn, M

    M. Krenn, M. Malik, T. Scheidl,et al.,Quantum Communication with Photons(Springer Nature, 2016), vol. 84 of Optics in Our Time, p. 455–482

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    An snspd-based detector system for nasa’s deep space optical communications project,

    E. E. Wollman, J. P. Allmaras, A. D. Beyer,et al., “An snspd-based detector system for nasa’s deep space optical communications project,” arXiv (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector,

    G. N. Gol’tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova,et al., “Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector,” Appl. Phys. Lett.79, 705–707 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,

    D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,” Optica7, 1649–1653 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Detecting telecom single photons with99.5+0.5 −2.07% system detection efficiency and high time resolution,

    J. Chang, J. W. N. Los, J. O. Tenorio-Pearl,et al., “Detecting telecom single photons with99.5+0.5 −2.07% system detection efficiency and high time resolution,” APL Photonics6, 036114 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Detecting single infrared photons toward optimal system detection efficiency,

    P. Hu, H. Li, L. You,et al., “Detecting single infrared photons toward optimal system detection efficiency,” Opt. Express 28, 36884–36891 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,

    B. Korzh, Q.-Y. Zhao, J. P. Allmaras,et al., “Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,” Nat. Photonics14, 250–255 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    High-speed detection of 1550 nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors,

    I. Craiciu, B. Korzh, A. D. Beyer,et al., “High-speed detection of 1550 nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors,” Optica10, 183–190 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Gigahertz detection rates and dynamic photon-number resolution with superconducting nanowire arrays,

    G. V. Resta, L. Stasi, M. Perrenoud,et al., “Gigahertz detection rates and dynamic photon-number resolution with superconducting nanowire arrays,” Nano Lett.23, 6018–6026 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    A compact multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array supporting gigabit space-to-ground communications,

    H. Hao, Q.-Y. Zhao, Y.-H. Huang,et al., “A compact multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array supporting gigabit space-to-ground communications,” Light. Sci. & Appl.13, 25 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Superconducting single-photon detector with a speed of 5 GHz and a photon number resolution of 61,

    T. Zhang, J. Huang, X. Zhang,et al., “Superconducting single-photon detector with a speed of 5 GHz and a photon number resolution of 61,” Photon. Res.12, 1328–1333 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    New constraints on dark photon dark matter with superconducting nanowire detectors in an optical haloscope,

    J. Chiles, I. Charaev, R. Lasenby,et al., “New constraints on dark photon dark matter with superconducting nanowire detectors in an optical haloscope,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 231802 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Quantum imaging technologies,

    M. Malik and R. W. Boyd, “Quantum imaging technologies,” Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento37, 273 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Imaging with quantum states of light,

    P.-A. Moreau, E. Toninelli, T. Gregory, and M. J. Padgett, “Imaging with quantum states of light,” Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 367–380 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Advances in quantum imaging,

    H. Defienne, W. P. Bowen, M. Chekhova,et al., “Advances in quantum imaging,” Nat. Photonics18, 1024–1036 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of laguerre–gaussian modes,

    M. Krenn, M. Malik, M. Erhard, and A. Zeilinger, “Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of laguerre–gaussian modes,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A375, 20150442 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    High-dimensional quantum communication: Benefits, progress, and future challenges,

    D. Cozzolino, B. D. Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, “High-dimensional quantum communication: Benefits, progress, and future challenges,” Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1900038 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Entangled ripples and twists of light: radial and azimuthal Laguerre–Gaussian mode entanglement,

    N. H. Valencia, V. Srivastav, S. Leedumrongwatthanakun,et al., “Entangled ripples and twists of light: radial and azimuthal Laguerre–Gaussian mode entanglement,” J. Opt.23, 104001 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Quick quantum steering: Overcoming loss and noise with qudits,

    V. Srivastav, N. H. Valencia, W. McCutcheon,et al., “Quick quantum steering: Overcoming loss and noise with qudits,” Phys. Rev. X12, 041023 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Conservation of angular momentum on a single-photon level,

    L. Kopf, R. Barros, S. Prabhakar,et al., “Conservation of angular momentum on a single-photon level,” (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light,

    M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, M. N. O’Sullivan,et al., “High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light,” New J. Of Phys.17, 033033 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Inverse design of high-dimensional quantum optical circuits in a complex medium,

    S. Goel, S. Leedumrongwatthanakun, N. H. Valencia,et al., “Inverse design of high-dimensional quantum optical circuits in a complex medium,” Nat. Phys.20, 232–239 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons,

    F. Brandt, M. Hiekkamäki, F. Bouchard,et al., “High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons,” Optica7, 98–107 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Processing entangled photons in high dimensions with a programmable light converter,

    O. Lib, K. Sulimany, and Y. Bromberg, “Processing entangled photons in high dimensions with a programmable light converter,” Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 014063 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Simultaneously sorting overlapping quantum states of light,

    S. Goel, M. Tyler, F. Zhu,et al., “Simultaneously sorting overlapping quantum states of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 143602 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Advances in high dimensional quantum entanglement,

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Advances in high dimensional quantum entanglement,” Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 365–381 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    High-Dimensional Pixel Entanglement: Efficient Generation and Certification,

    N. H. Valencia, V. Srivastav, M. Pivoluska,et al., “High-Dimensional Pixel Entanglement: Efficient Generation and Certification,” Quantum4, 376 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Quantifying high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a single-photon- sensitive time-stamping camera,

    B. Courme, C. Vernière, P. Svihra,et al., “Quantifying high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a single-photon- sensitive time-stamping camera,” Opt. Lett.48, 3439–3442 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Full waveform lidar for adverse weather conditions,

    A. M. Wallace, A. Halimi, and G. S. Buller, “Full waveform lidar for adverse weather conditions,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol.69, 7064–7077 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Robust real-time 3D imaging of moving scenes through atmospheric obscurant using single-photon lidar,

    R. Tobin, A. Halimi, A. McCarthy,et al., “Robust real-time 3D imaging of moving scenes through atmospheric obscurant using single-photon lidar,” Sci. Reports11, 11236 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Transmissionbyhazeandfoginthespectralregion0.35to10microns ∗,

    A.Arnulf,J.Bricard,E.Curé,andC.Véret,“Transmissionbyhazeandfoginthespectralregion0.35to10microns ∗,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.47, 491–498 (1957)

    1957

  28. [36]

    Three-dimensional single-photon imaging through obscurants,

    R. Tobin, A. Halimi, A. McCarthy,et al., “Three-dimensional single-photon imaging through obscurants,” Opt. Express 27, 4590–4611 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Terrestrial solar spectral data sets,

    R. Bird, R. Hulstrom, and L. Lewis, “Terrestrial solar spectral data sets,” Sol. Energy30, 563–573 (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Photon counting carbon dioxide gas sensing at 2.05µm wavelength,

    E. N. MacKenzie, T. Staffas, V. Zwiller, and R. H. Hadfield, “Photon counting carbon dioxide gas sensing at 2.05µm wavelength,” inQuantum Optics and Photon Counting 2023,vol. 12570 I. Prochazka and R. Sobolewski, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2023...

    2023

  31. [39]

    A near-infrared 64-pixel superconducting nanowire single photon detector array with integrated multiplexed readout,

    M. S. Allman, V. B. Verma, M. Stevens,et al., “A near-infrared 64-pixel superconducting nanowire single photon detector array with integrated multiplexed readout,” Appl. Phys. Lett.106, 192601 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Experimental fast quantum random number generation using high- dimensional entanglement with entropy monitoring,

    F. Xu, J. H. Shapiro, and F. N. C. Wong, “Experimental fast quantum random number generation using high- dimensional entanglement with entropy monitoring,” Optica3, 1266–1269 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states,

    O. Lib and Y. Bromberg, “Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states,” (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Real-time 3D reconstruction from single-photon lidar data using plug-and-play point cloud denoisers,

    J. Tachella, Y. Altmann, N. Mellado,et al., “Real-time 3D reconstruction from single-photon lidar data using plug-and-play point cloud denoisers,” Nat. Commun.10, 4984 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon sensing of cerebral blood flow,

    N. Ozana, A. I. Zavriyev, D. Mazumder,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon sensing of cerebral blood flow,” Neurophotonics8, 035006 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Three-dimensional imaging of stationary and moving targets in turbid underwater environments using a single-photon detector array,

    A. Maccarone, F. M. D. Rocca, A. McCarthy,et al., “Three-dimensional imaging of stationary and moving targets in turbid underwater environments using a single-photon detector array,” Opt. Express27, 28437–28456 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Frequency-multiplexed bias and readout of a 16-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array,

    S. Doerner, A. Kuzmin, S. Wuensch,et al., “Frequency-multiplexed bias and readout of a 16-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array,” Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 032603 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    A 64-pixel nbtin superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array for spatially resolved photon detection,

    S. Miki, T. Yamashita, Z. Wang, and H. Terai, “A 64-pixel nbtin superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array for spatially resolved photon detection,” Opt. Express22, 7811–7820 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Scalableimplementationofasuperconductingnanowiresingle-photon detector array with a superconducting digital signal processor,

    M.Yabuno,S.Miyajima,S.Miki,andH.Terai,“Scalableimplementationofasuperconductingnanowiresingle-photon detector array with a superconducting digital signal processor,” Opt. Express28, 12047–12057 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Amplitude-multiplexed readout of single photon detectors based on superconducting nanowires,

    A. Gaggero, F. Martini, F. Mattioli,et al., “Amplitude-multiplexed readout of single photon detectors based on superconducting nanowires,” Optica6, 823–828 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    A scalable multi-photon coincidence detector based on superconducting nanowires,

    D. Zhu, Q.-Y. Zhao, H. Choi,et al., “A scalable multi-photon coincidence detector based on superconducting nanowires,” Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 596–601 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Kilopixelarrayofsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectors,

    E.E.Wollman,V.B.Verma,A.E.Lita, etal.,“Kilopixelarrayofsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectors,” Opt. Express27, 35279–35289 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Demonstration of a thermally coupled row-column snspd imaging array,

    J. P. Allmaras, E. E. Wollman, A. D. Beyer,et al., “Demonstration of a thermally coupled row-column snspd imaging array,” Nano Lett.20, 2163–2168 (2020). PMID: 32091221

    2020

  44. [52]

    32× 32 nbn snspd array based on thermally coupled row-column multiplexing architecture,

    T. Zhang, Y. Xiao, H. Yu,et al., “32× 32 nbn snspd array based on thermally coupled row-column multiplexing architecture,” Superconductivity7, 100056 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Single-photon imager based on a superconducting nanowire delay line,

    Q.-Y. Zhao, D. Zhu, N. Calandri,et al., “Single-photon imager based on a superconducting nanowire delay line,” Nat. Photonics 11, 247–251 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels,

    B. G. Oripov, D. S. Rampini, J. Allmaras,et al., “A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels,” Nature622, 730–734 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Jitter characterization of a dual-readout snspd,

    D. F. Santavicca, B. Noble, C. Kilgore,et al., “Jitter characterization of a dual-readout snspd,” IEEE Trans. on Appl. Supercond. 29, 1–4 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Free-space coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with low dark counts,

    A. S. Mueller, B. Korzh, M. Runyan,et al., “Free-space coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with low dark counts,” Optica8, 1586–1587 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Opticalpropertiesofsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectors,

    V.Anant,A.J.Kerman,E.A.Dauler, etal.,“Opticalpropertiesofsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectors,” Opt. Express16, 10750–10761 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Ultra-high bandwidth quantum secured data transmission,

    J. F. Dynes, W. W.-S. Tam, A. Plews,et al., “Ultra-high bandwidth quantum secured data transmission,” Sci. Reports 6, 35149 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Quantum key distribution over a 40-db channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors,

    H. Takesue, S. W. Nam, Q. Zhang,et al., “Quantum key distribution over a 40-db channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors,” Nat. Photonics1, 343–348 (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Impedance-matched differential superconducting nanowire detectors,

    M. Colangelo, B. Korzh, J. P. Allmaras,et al., “Impedance-matched differential superconducting nanowire detectors,” Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 044093 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Superconducting nanowire single photon detectors for deep space optical communication (Conference Presentation),

    M. Shaw, F. Marsili, A. Beyer,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single photon detectors for deep space optical communication (Conference Presentation),” inFree-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXIX, vol. 10096 H. Hemmati and D. M. Boroson, eds., Internatio...

    2017

  54. [62]

    Quantum optical tomography based on time-resolved and mode-selective single-photon detection by femtosecond up-conversion,

    N. Namekata, N. Kobayashi, K. Nomura,et al., “Quantum optical tomography based on time-resolved and mode-selective single-photon detection by femtosecond up-conversion,” Sci. Reports13, 21080 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Advances in InGaAs/InP single-photon detector systems for quantum communication,

    J. Zhang, M. A. Itzler, H. Zbinden, and J.-W. Pan, “Advances in InGaAs/InP single-photon detector systems for quantum communication,” Light. Sci. & Appl.4, e286–e286 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Gigahertz-gated InGaAs/InP single-photon detector with detection efficiency exceeding 55% at 1550 nm,

    L. C. Comandar, B. Fröhlich, J. F. Dynes,et al., “Gigahertz-gated InGaAs/InP single-photon detector with detection efficiency exceeding 55% at 1550 nm,” J. Appl. Phys.117, 083109 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    Single-photon detection efficiency up to 50% at 1310 nm with an InGaAs/InP avalanche diode gated at 1.25 GHz,

    A. Restelli, J. C. Bienfang, and A. L. Migdall, “Single-photon detection efficiency up to 50% at 1310 nm with an InGaAs/InP avalanche diode gated at 1.25 GHz,” Appl. Phys. Lett.102, 141104 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Reduction of afterpulse and dark count effects on spad detectors using processing methods,

    A. Erfanian, M. Rahmanpour, M. Khaje,et al., “Reduction of afterpulse and dark count effects on spad detectors using processing methods,” Results Opt.15, 100617 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Free-running single-photon detection via ghz gated ingaas/inp apd for high time resolution and count rate up to 500 mcount/s,

    W. Wu, X. Shan, Y. Long,et al., “Free-running single-photon detection via ghz gated ingaas/inp apd for high time resolution and count rate up to 500 mcount/s,” Micromachines14 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Deep mouse brain two-photon near-infrared fluorescence imaging using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array,

    A. Tamimi, M. Caldarola, S. Hambura,et al., “Deep mouse brain two-photon near-infrared fluorescence imaging using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array,” ACS Photonics11, 3960–3971 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for laser communication,

    A. Guardiani, H. Vlot, L. Locht,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for laser communication,” inFree-Space Laser Communications XXXVI,vol. 12877 H. Hemmati and B. S. Robinson, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2024), p. 128770S. ...

    2024

  62. [70]

    Fig.6showstherack-mountedloweringmechanismthatallowsforthecryostathousing to be lowered

    Photographs of the Cryostat system Fig.5showsthearrayinusewithelectroniccablesleadingfromthecryostattothetime-to-digital convertor. Fig.6showstherack-mountedloweringmechanismthatallowsforthecryostathousing to be lowered. Fig. 7 shows the internal components of the crysostat in...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.