Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 106 references

Inadequate turbulent support in low-metallicity molecular clouds

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Molecular clouds in metal-poor environments are subvirial: their turbulent energy is inadequate to counterbalance self-gravity, and a magnetic field likely supplies the missing support.

desk verdict Genuinely new outer-disk 13CO data and careful analysis, but the alpha_vir-metallicity trend is partly built in by the adopted H2/13CO gradients; the solid core is the sigma_v decline. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07636 v2 pith:AGVBFOF2 submitted 2025-01-13 astro-ph.GA

Lingrui Lin , Zhi-Yu Zhang , Junzhi Wang , Padelis P. Papadopoulos , Yong Shi , Yan Gong , Yan Sun , Yichen Sun
show 11 more authors
Thomas G. Bisbas Donatella Romano Di Li Hauyu Baobab Liu Keping Qiu Lijie Liu Gan Luo Chao-Wei Tsai Jingwen Wu Siyi Feng Bo Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords virialparametermolecularcloudslowmetallicity13COmappingGalacticouterdiskdwarfgalaxiesmagneticfieldsupportstarformationinitialconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the virial parameter of molecular clouds — the ratio of turbulent kinetic energy to gravitational binding energy — is not universally near unity but falls systematically with metallicity. Using new, sensitive maps of the optically thin $^{13}$CO lines in the Milky Way's outer disk, combined with archival data from the inner Galaxy and four nearby metal-poor dwarf galaxies, it finds that clouds shift from supervirial states ($\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}} > 1$) in metal-rich regions to extremely subvirial states ($\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}}$ as low as about 0.1) at low metallicity. The authors conclude that turbulence alone cannot hold such clouds up, and that a volumetric magnetic field — at strengths already typical of the inner Galaxy — likely takes over as the dominant support. If the paper is right, the long-standing picture of molecular clouds hovering near virial equilibrium breaks down, and the initial conditions for star formation in galaxy outskirts, dwarf galaxies, and the early Universe must be revised.

What carries the argument

The organizing quantity is the virial parameter $\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}} = 5\sigma_v^2 R_{\mathrm{cloud}}/(G M_{\mathrm{mol}})$, measured for every cloud within the half-peak isophote of the H$_2$ column density reconstructed from the optically thin $^{13}$CO lines. Cloud masses come from converting $^{13}$CO column density to H$_2$ through a metallicity-dependent abundance ratio (Eq. 6) built from the adopted $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C and O/H radial gradients, which makes $\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}}$ inversely proportional to the assumed H$_2$/$^{13}$CO ratio. The supporting argument then shifts to the general virial theorem (Eq. 12), whose volumetric magnetic term is the only support term besides kinetic energy; from it, Eq. 14 relates the magnetic field strength needed to support a subvirial cloud to the measured $\sigma_v^2/R_{\mathrm{cloud}}$ and gas surface density, and the paper compares those required fields with the empirical $B$–$n_{\mathrm{H}}$ relation for the solar neighborhood.

What would settle it

Recompute cloud masses in the same outer-disk and dwarf-galaxy clouds with a tracer independent of the metallicity-scaled $^{13}$CO-to-H$_2$ ratio, for example, dust continuum with an independently calibrated dust-to-gas ratio, and see whether the subvirial values (down to $\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}} \approx 0.1$) survive; if they return to near unity, the trend is an artifact of the abundance conversion. Directly, Zeeman measurements toward outer-disk clouds should detect volume-averaged fields of order 100 microgauss if Eq. 14 describes their support; field strengths well below 10 microgauss would rule out the proposed magnetic-support mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the virial parameter $\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}}$ declines monotonically with gas-phase metallicity, from supervirial states ($\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}} \gtrsim 1$) in the metal-rich inner Galaxy to extremely subvirial states at $Z \lesssim 0.5\,Z_\odot$, with the trend continuing through the Magellanic Clouds, NGC 6822, and the extremely metal-poor dwarf DDO 70. This implies that kinetic energy and self-gravitational energy are not in balance in low-metallicity molecular clouds: turbulence alone is inadequate to counterbalance self-gravity. Invoking the general virial theorem, the paper shows that a magnetic field of roughly the magnitude expected from the empirical $B$–$n_{\mathrm{H}}$ relation in the solar neighborhood (of order 100 microgauss volume-averaged) would suffice to support these clouds, and it proposes that higher ionization fractions and weaker turbulence in the parent atomic gas at low metallicity let the magnetic field dominate.

Load-bearing premise

The entire trend rests on the assumed abundance ratio used to turn $^{13}$CO emission into gas mass rising with distance from the Galactic center; if the true gradients of this ratio are gentler than adopted, the decline in the virial parameter — including the extremely subvirial values — could largely disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Virial equilibrium ($\alpha_{\mathrm{vir}} \approx 1$) is not a universal state of molecular gas: the dynamical state is set by the environment, chiefly metallicity.
  • Below roughly half solar metallicity, turbulent kinetic energy no longer balances self-gravity, and the volumetric magnetic field becomes the dominant cloud-supporting mechanism.
  • The field strength needed to support the subvirial clouds is no larger than field strengths already inferred in the inner Galaxy, so low-metallicity clouds require no special magnetization.
  • The supervirial clouds of the metal-rich inner Galaxy are most plausibly confined by external boundary pressure rather than being unbound or collapsing.
  • Established uses of the virial-equilibrium assumption — calibrating the CO-to-H2 conversion factor and setting the initial conditions for star formation in simulations — lose their footing in metal-poor environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Surveying a single spiral galaxy whose metallicity spans the $Z \approx 0.5\,Z_\odot$ boundary could map the supervirial-to-subvirial transition continuously and reveal whether it is sharp or gradual; the present data sample only the two sides separately.
  • If magnetic support is what holds these clouds up, star formation should proceed on timescales set by ion-neutral coupling rather than by turbulent crossing — a difference that would show up in the core-formation rates of metal-poor galaxies.
  • The mechanism implies that molecular clouds inherit their weak turbulence from the cold atomic gas around them, so joint HI and CO surveys of metal-poor dwarfs should find the velocity dispersion dropping together in both phases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new 13CO J=1->0 and J=2->1 mapping observations of molecular clouds in the Galactic outer disk at Galactocentric radii of roughly 9-24 kpc, and combines these with archival inner-disk clouds from the Galactic Ring Survey and with CO data for the LMC, SMC, NGC 6822, and DDO 70. Cloud masses are derived from 13CO column densities using an LTE excitation analysis and a metallicity-dependent H2/13CO abundance ratio, after which the authors measure cloud radii, velocity dispersions, masses, and the virial parameter. The headline claim is that alpha_vir declines systematically with decreasing gas-phase metallicity, from supervirial states in the metal-rich inner Galaxy to extremely subvirial states in metal-poor outer-disk and dwarf-galaxy clouds, implying that turbulence alone cannot support low-metallicity molecular clouds and that magnetic fields may become the dominant support mechanism. The paper includes extensive tests of resolution, sensitivity, and selection effects, and it releases reduced data cubes, spectra, maps, and distance PDFs.

Significance. If the alpha_vir-metallicity trend is real, the result is significant: it would challenge the common assumption of universal virial equilibrium for molecular clouds, and it would point to environment-dependent cloud support with consequences for star-formation initial conditions in low-metallicity galaxies and at high redshift. The paper has real strengths: the new 13CO observations fill a genuine gap in the outer Galaxy, the direct measurement of declining velocity dispersion with Galactocentric radius is robust, and the authors provide careful mock-cloud tests of resolution and sensitivity effects as well as a public data release. The principal weakness is that the headline alpha_vir trend is not independent of the adopted H2/13CO abundance scaling; the manuscript itself shows that a constant-abundance test flattens the trend, and the most extreme subvirial points are those most sensitive to the steepest, least-constrained part of the adopted gradient. The magnetic-support interpretation inherits this same conversion uncertainty.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (6) and Eq. (11); Supplementary Fig. 3] The central alpha_vir-metallicity trend is not directly observed; it is substantially generated by the adopted mass conversion. Combining Eqs. (6), (9), and (11) gives alpha_vir proportional to d^{-1}(H2/13CO)^{-1} for fixed 13CO surface brightness and line width. With the adopted 12C/13C gradient (5.87 Rgc + 13.25, ref. 35) and H2/12CO proportional to 10^{+0.044(Rgc-Rgc,sun)} (ref. 31), H2/13CO increases by roughly a factor of 7 toward Rgc=20 kpc and more than a factor of 10 toward Rgc=23 kpc. A decreasing alpha_vir with decreasing metallicity is therefore partly built into the mass estimate. The paper's own constant-abundance test (Supplementary Fig. 3) makes the alpha_vir trend flatter, and the extremely subvirial values at Rgc>20 kpc in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 are exactly the points most amplified by the extrapolated gradient. The paper also states that 12C/13C is poorly measured beyond about 12 kpc and that the O/H gradient is poorly constrained beyond 18 kpc, so the steepness of the adopted gradient is not empirically forced. The 12CO sanity check in Supplementary Fig. 11 adopts X_CO proportional to Z^{-1}, so it is not an independent confirmation either.
  2. [Methods, 'H2 surface density'] The dwarf-galaxy extension of the trend rests on the same assumption. The text fixes H2/13CO = 3 x 10^6 for the LMC and adopts H2/13CO = 7.5 x 10^6 for the SMC and NGC 6822, scaled from the LMC value through the metallicity ratio. Since alpha_vir is inversely proportional to H2/13CO, this choice automatically lowers alpha_vir as metallicity decreases. The LMC, SMC, and NGC 6822 points in Fig. 3 therefore cannot serve as independent evidence for the claimed trend; they partly restate the metallicity scaling that was put into the mass conversion. To make the dwarf-galaxy extension convincing, the authors need either an independent mass calibration, such as dust continuum or a CO-to-H2 conversion that does not already assume the O/H gradient, or a quantitative uncertainty treatment that propagates a range of abundance-ratio priors into alpha_vir.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (14); Supplementary Fig. 8] The magnetic-support conclusion inherits the same conversion uncertainty. In Eq. (14), the magnetic field required for support is solved from sigma_v^2/R and the mass surface density Sigma_mol; if H2/13CO is overestimated at low metallicity, Sigma_mol is overestimated, alpha_vir is underestimated, and the required field strength B is overestimated. Because the volume density n_H used in Supplementary Fig. 8 is also derived from the same mass, the comparison with the B-n_H relation of Crutcher+2010 is not independent of the abundance assumption. The authors should demonstrate how the required B field changes when H2/13CO is varied within a plausible range, or when the constant-abundance test is used, before concluding that magnetic fields can replace turbulence in low-metallicity clouds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, IRAM 30 m observations] There is a typo: 'Janunary' should be 'January'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption refers to the 'bottom axis' and 'top axis' for metallicity and Galactocentric radius, respectively; please check that the printed axis placement matches this description consistently in the final version.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (6)] The notation '12CO/13CO' and 'H2/12CO' in Eq. (6) is clear in context, but explicitly writing N12CO/N13CO and N_H2/N12CO immediately before the equation would avoid ambiguity about whether the ratios are column-density ratios or abundance ratios.
  4. [Methods, 'Physical properties of molecular clouds'] For DDO 70, the mass estimate depends on the assumed density profile exponent k=1.8; a brief justification of this choice, or a statement of how alpha_vir would change for the plausible range of k, would make the DDO 70 point easier to evaluate.
  5. [Supplementary Fig. 5] The heliocentric-distance control test uses only two clouds at Rgc around 13 kpc in the distance range of 15-20 kpc; the small size of this comparison sample should be acknowledged explicitly in the text.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The declining αvir–Z trend is substantially constructed by the adopted metallicity-dependent H2/13CO conversion; extreme subvirial values rest on extrapolated abundance gradients.

  1. self definitional [Methods, 'H2 surface density' (Eq. 6) and 'Systematic errors in Mmol and αvir']
    "NH2 = N13CO × 12CO/13CO × H2/12CO. (6) ... (12C/13C= 5.87Rgc + 13.25) ... αvir∝ d−1(H2/13CO)−1."

    Because αvir is inversely proportional to H2/13CO and H2/13CO is assumed to increase monotonically with Rgc through the adopted 12C/13C and O/H gradients, the plotted decline of αvir with decreasing metallicity is substantially imposed by the conversion factor before any cloud dynamics are measured. The paper's own constant-abundance test (Supplementary Fig. 3) flattens the trend, and the extreme subvirial values for Rgc>20 kpc are exactly those amplified by the extrapolated gradient. Thus the 'revealed' αvir–Z trend is in large part a restatement of the assumed abundance–metallicity relation rather than an independent dynamical measurement.

  2. self definitional [Methods, 'H2 surface density' (dwarf galaxies)]
    "We assumed H2/13CO = 3 ×10^6 (ref. 9,67) for molecular clouds in the LMC. We adopted H2/13CO = 7.5 × 10^6 for the SMC and NGC 6822, which was scaled from the LMC value through their metallicity ratio."

    For the dwarf galaxies, the H2/13CO conversion factor is set directly from metallicity (fixed for the LMC, then scaled for the SMC and NGC 6822 by their metallicity ratio). Since Mmol and hence αvir are inversely proportional to this conversion factor, each dwarf-galaxy point's αvir–Z placement is partly manufactured by the assumed abundance scaling. The 'extension' of the trend to extremely low metallicity, including DDO 70's literature values, therefore inherits the same construction rather than being an independent test.

full rationale

The paper uses new 13CO maps and archival data to measure cloud sizes, velocity dispersions, and line intensities, which are genuine observational inputs. However, the conversion from 13CO emission to H2 mass is explicitly made through an abundance ratio that is assumed to vary with Galactocentric radius (and hence metallicity), and the paper itself derives αvir ∝ (H2/13CO)^{-1}. Consequently, a monotonic decrease of αvir with decreasing Z is partly hard-wired into the analysis. The authors acknowledge the slope sensitivity and provide a constant-abundance test showing the trend flattens, so the claim is not wholly circular: the residual trend and the actual σ_v–Rcloud data retain independent content. The most extreme subvirial values, especially at Rgc>20 kpc and in dwarfs, are strongly amplified by the assumed gradient and the metallicity-scaled dwarf conversion factors. No load-bearing self-citation was found; the key abundance gradients come from external references (refs. 31, 35). Overall, the central dynamical trend is partially constructed from the input abundance–Z relation, warranting a score of 5 on the circularity scale.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The magnetic support mechanism is standard interstellar medium physics. The key inputs pulled from outside the paper are the abundance ratios and gradients used to convert 13CO emission into H2 mass, which directly control the alpha_vir values that drive the central conclusion.

free parameters (6)
  • H2/13CO abundance ratio for LMC = 3e6
    Adopted from Fujii+2014 (ref. 67); directly scales all LMC cloud masses and hence alpha_vir.
  • H2/13CO abundance ratio for SMC and NGC 6822 = 7.5e6
    Scaled from the LMC value by the metallicity ratio; sets the dwarf galaxy alpha_vir values.
  • 12C/13C gradient = 12C/13C = 5.87 Rgc + 13.25
    Adopted from Jacob+2020 (ref. 35); extrapolated to Rgc > 12 kpc despite sparse measurements; controls H2/13CO and thus masses and alpha_vir in the outer disk.
  • O/H gradient = decreasing by 0.044 dex/kpc from solar circle
    Adopted from Mendez-Delgado+2022 (ref. 31); extrapolated beyond 18 kpc; sets the metallicity axis and part of the H2/13CO scaling.
  • Excitation temperature Tex for clouds without 12CO = 15 K
    Assumed typical kinetic temperature for IRDCs and Planck cold clumps; changes N13CO by about 20 percent for J=1-0.
  • DDO 70 density profile exponent k = 1.8
    Used to convert the projected boundary surface density from Shi+2020 into a mean surface density for the five DDO 70 clumps.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption 13CO emission is optically thin for the bulk of the molecular gas and traces H2 column density under LTE.
    Methods, Eqs. 4-6. If 13CO is optically thick or subthermally excited in low-metallicity clouds, both masses and linewidths would be biased.
  • domain assumption 12CO lines are optically thick and share the excitation temperature with 13CO when both are observed.
    Methods, Eq. 2. This is used to derive Tex from the 12CO peak temperature.
  • domain assumption The B versus nH relation of Crutcher+2010, established in the solar neighborhood and inner Galaxy, holds in the outer Galaxy and in metal-poor dwarf galaxies.
    Supplementary Fig. 8. The magnetic support argument requires that fields similar to inner-Galaxy values, about 100 microgauss, exist in low-metallicity clouds.
  • standard math The general virial theorem in the form of Eq. 12 applies to these clouds, with magnetic and external pressure terms written as specified.
    Standard textbook result (Spitzer; Bertoldi and McKee), but the application neglects tidal terms and assumes quasi-static, non-accelerating clouds.
  • domain assumption The gas-phase O/H gradient measured from H II regions represents the metallicities of the molecular clouds themselves.
    Main text and Fig. 3. If molecular gas is enriched or depleted relative to H II regions, the Z axis would be shifted and the trend slope changed.
  • domain assumption Ion-neutral coupling is effective at scales larger than 0.01 pc, so the magnetic field is well coupled to the neutral gas in these clouds.
    Methods section 'The general virial theorem'. This underpins the claim that magnetic pressure can support subvirial clouds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inadequate turbulent support in low-metallicity molecular clouds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGVBFOF2

@misc{pith2026250107636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inadequate turbulent support in low-metallicity molecular clouds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGVBFOF2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07636}
}
abstract

The dynamic properties of molecular clouds are set by the interplay of their self-gravity, turbulence, external pressure and magnetic fields. Extended surveys of Galactic molecular clouds typically find that their kinetic energy ($E_{\rm k}$) counterbalances their self-gravitational energy ($E_{\rm g}$), setting their virial parameter $\alpha_{\rm vir}=2E_{\rm k}/|E_{\rm g}|\approx1$. However, past studies either have been biased by the use of optically-thick lines or have been limited within the solar neighborhood and the inner Galaxy (Galactocentric radius $R_{\rm gc}<R_{\rm gc,\odot} \approx 8$ kpc). Here we present sensitive mapping observations of optically thin $^{13}$CO lines towards molecular clouds in the low-metallicity Galactic outer disk ($R_{\rm gc}\sim9-24$ kpc). By combining archival data from the inner Galaxy and four nearby metal-poor dwarf galaxies, we reveal a systematic trend of $\alpha_{\rm vir}$, which declines from supervirial dynamic states in metal-rich clouds to extremely subvirial dynamic states in metal-poor clouds. In these metal-poor environments, turbulence alone is insufficient to counterbalance the self-gravity of a cloud. A cloud-volumetric magnetic field may replace turbulence as the dominant cloud-supporting mechanism in low-metallicity conditions, for example, the outermost galactic disks, dwarf galaxies and galaxies in the early Universe, which would then inevitably impact the initial conditions for star formation in such environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of molecular clouds on the Galactic plane. Spiral arm models from the Bar and Spiral Structure Legacy (BeSSeL) Survey36 are overlaid, including the 3-kpc arm (gray dotted line), the Local arm/spur (gray dashed line), the Sagittarius–Carina arm (gray dash-dotted line), the Perseus arm (black thick dotted line), the Norma-Outer arm (brown thick dash-dotted line), and the Scutum–Centaurus–OSC arm (blue thi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variations of the cloud velocity dispersion. a, σv versus Rgc. Purple stars, red triangles, and green dots are the outer disk molecular clouds observed with ALMA Total Power, IRAM 30-m, and SMT, respectively. The gray hexagons show inner disk molecular clouds from the Galactic Ring Survey3 . The vertical black-dotted line shows the Galactocentric radius of the Sun (Rgc,⊙). b, σv versus Rcloud. The outer disk molecul… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Variation of cloud virial parameter as a function of the gas-phase metallicity. Purple stars, red triangles, and green dots are the outer disk molecular clouds observed with ALMA Total Power, IRAM 30-m, and SMT, respectively. The gray hexagons show inner disk molecular clouds from the Galactic Ring Survey3 . Molecular clouds from metal-poor galaxies, i.e, LMC (olive cross, median), SMC (blue thin-diamond, median), N… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Larson, R. B. Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 194, 809–826 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    M., Rivolo, A

    Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J. & Yahil, A. Mass, Luminosity, and Line Width Relations of Galactic Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 319, 730 (1987)

    1987

  3. [3]

    & Jackson, J

    Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J. & Jackson, J. M. Re-Examining Larson’s Scaling Relationships in Galactic Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 699, 1092–1103 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    & Lee, E

    Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Murray, N. & Lee, E. J. Physical Properties of Molecular Clouds for the Entire Milky Way Disk. Astrophys. J. 834, 57 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    D., Leroy, A

    Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., Rosolowsky, E., Walter, F. & Blitz, L. The Resolved Properties of Extragalactic Giant Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 686, 948–965 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    & Kawamura, A

    Fukui, Y . & Kawamura, A. Molecular Clouds in Nearby Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48, 547–580 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Hughes, A. et al. Physical properties of giant molecular clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, 2065–2086 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Schruba, A. et al. Physical Properties of Molecular Clouds at 2 pc Resolution in the Low-metallicity Dwarf Galaxy NGC 6822 and the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 835, 278 (2017)

    2017

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    Relations between Molecular Cloud Structure Sizes and Line Widths in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Wong, T.et al. Relations between Molecular Cloud Structure Sizes and Line Widths in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 885, 50 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Saldaño, H. P. et al. CO(2−1) survey at 9 pc resolution in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 672, A153 (2023). 25/32

    2023

  3. [11]

    Elmegreen, B. G. A Pressure and Metallicity Dependence for Molecular Cloud Correlations and the Calibration of Mass. Astrophys. J. 338, 178 (1989)

    1989

  4. [12]

    Six myths on the virial theorem for interstellar clouds

    Ballesteros-Paredes, J. Six myths on the virial theorem for interstellar clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 443–449 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    & McKee, C

    Bertoldi, F. & McKee, C. F. Pressure-confined Clumps in Magnetized Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 395, 140 (1992)

    1992

  6. [14]

    Sun, J. et al. Cloud-scale Molecular Gas Properties in 15 Nearby Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 860, 172 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Federrath, C. et al. The Link between Turbulence, Magnetic Fields, Filaments, and Star Formation in the Central Molecular Zone Cloud G0.253+0.016. Astrophys. J. 832, 143 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Liu, L. et al. WISDOM Project - IX. Giant molecular clouds in the lenticular galaxy NGC 4429: effects of shear and tidal forces on clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 4048–4085 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Petkova, M. A. et al. Kinematics of Galactic Centre clouds shaped by shear-seeded solenoidal turbulence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 962–968 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    D., Wolfire, M

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. The CO-to-H2 Conversion Factor. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 207–268 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Swinbank, A. M. et al. The Interstellar Medium in Distant Star-forming Galaxies: Turbulent Pressure, Fragmentation, and Cloud Scaling Relations in a Dense Gas Disk at z = 2.3. Astrophys. J. 742, 11 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    McKee, C. F. & Tan, J. C. The Formation of Massive Stars from Turbulent Cores. Astrophys. J. 585, 850–871 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    & Körtgen, B

    Völschow, M., Banerjee, R. & Körtgen, B. Star formation in evolving molecular clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 605, A97 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    & Goldsmith, P

    Hacar, A., Alves, J., Burkert, A. & Goldsmith, P. Opacity broadening and interpretation of suprather- mal CO linewidths: Macroscopic turbulence and tangled molecular clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A104 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Wilson, T. L. & Rood, R. Abundances in the Interstellar Medium. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.32, 191–226 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    M., Johnson, A

    Rathborne, J. M., Johnson, A. M., Jackson, J. M., Shah, R. Y . & Simon, R. Molecular Clouds and Clumps in the Boston University-Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory Galactic Ring Survey. Astrophys. Js 182, 131–142 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    H., Carpenter, J

    Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J. M. & Snell, R. L. The Equilibrium State of Molecular Regions in the Outer Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 551, 852–866 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Benedettini, M. et al. Molecular cloud catalogue from 13CO (1-0) data of the Forgotten Quadrant Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 654, A144 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    M., Heyer, M., Rathborne, J

    Roman-Duval, J., Jackson, J. M., Heyer, M., Rathborne, J. & Simon, R. Physical Properties and Galactic Distribution of Molecular Clouds Identified in the Galactic Ring Survey. Astrophys. J. 723, 492–507 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Rigby, A. J. et al. CHIMPS: physical properties of molecular clumps across the inner Galaxy.Astron. Astrophys. 632, A58 (2019). 26/32

    2019

  21. [29]

    H., Lee, J

    Knapen, J. H., Lee, J. C. & de Paz, A. G. Outskirts of galaxies (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    G., McKee, C

    Wolfire, M. G., McKee, C. F., Hollenbach, D. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. Neutral Atomic Phases of the Interstellar Medium in the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 587, 278–311 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Méndez-Delgado, J. E. et al. Gradients of chemical abundances in the Milky Way from H II regions: distances derived from Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and temperature inhomogeneities.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 4436–4455 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    The chemical evolution of the galactic thick and thin disks

    Chiappini, C. The chemical evolution of the galactic thick and thin disks. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 4, 191–196 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Inefficient star formation in extremely metal poor galaxies

    Shi, Y .et al. Inefficient star formation in extremely metal poor galaxies. Nature 514, 335–338 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Hunt, L. K. et al. ALMA observations of cool dust in a low-metallicity starburst, SBS 0335-052. Astron. Astrophys. 561, A49 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Jacob, A. M. et al. First detection of 13CH in the interstellar medium. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A125 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Reid, M. J. et al. Trigonometric Parallaxes of High-mass Star-forming Regions: Our View of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 885, 131 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Russell, S. C. & Dopita, M. A. Abundances of the Heavy Elements in the Magellanic Clouds. III. Interpretation of Results. Astrophys. J. 384, 508 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    Jameson, K. E. et al. First Results from the Herschel and ALMA Spectroscopic Surveys of the SMC: The Relationship between [C II]-bright Gas and CO-bright Gas at Low Metallicity. Astrophys. J. 853, 111 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Pagel, B. E. J. CNO Abundances in Dwarf and Spiral Galaxies (invited review). In Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D. & Meynet, G. (eds.) CNO in the Universe, vol. 304 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 187 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    & Hernández-Martínez, L

    García-Rojas, J., Peña, M., Flores-Durán, S. & Hernández-Martínez, L. The planetary nebulae and H II regions in NGC 6822 revisited. Clues to AGB nucleosynthesis. Astron. Astrophys. 586, A59 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Oversized Gas Clumps in an Extremely Metal-poor Molecular Cloud Revealed by ALMA’s Parsec-scale Maps

    Shi, Y .et al. Oversized Gas Clumps in an Extremely Metal-poor Molecular Cloud Revealed by ALMA’s Parsec-scale Maps. Astrophys. J. 892, 147 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Ohno, T. et al. An Unbiased CO Survey Toward the Northern Region of the Small Magellanic Cloud with the Atacama Compact Array. II. CO Cloud Catalog. Astrophys. J. 949, 63 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Physical processes in the interstellar medium (John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    Spitzer Jr, L. Physical processes in the interstellar medium (John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    P., Bergin, E

    Williams, J. P., Bergin, E. A., Caselli, P., Myers, P. C. & Plume, R. The Ionization Fraction in Dense Molecular Gas. I. Low-Mass Cores. Astrophys. J. 503, 689–699 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    M., Wandelt, B., Heiles, C., Falgarone, E

    Crutcher, R. M., Wandelt, B., Heiles, C., Falgarone, E. & Troland, T. H. Magnetic Fields in Interstellar Clouds from Zeeman Observations: Inference of Total Field Strengths by Bayesian Analysis. Astrophys. J. 725, 466–479 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Kobayashi, M. I. N. et al. Metallicity Dependence of Molecular Cloud Hierarchical Structure at Early Evolutionary Stages. Astrophys. J. 954, 38 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    The interstellar medium (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    Lequeux, J. The interstellar medium (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004). 27/32

    2004

  40. [48]

    B., Blackman, E

    Field, G. B., Blackman, E. G. & Keto, E. R. Does external pressure explain recent results for molecular clouds? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 710–714 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    J., Camacho, V

    Ramírez-Galeano, L., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Smith, R. J., Camacho, V . & Zamora-Avilés, M. Why most molecular clouds are gravitationally dominated. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 2822–2836 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Curtis-Lake, E. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z = 10.3-13.2. Nature Astronomy 7, 622–632 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Wouterloot, J. G. A. & Brand, J. IRAS sources beyond the solar circle. I. CO observations. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 80, 149–187 (1989)

    1989

  44. [52]

    A Possible Extension of the Scutum-Centaurus Arm into the Outer Second Quadrant

    Sun, Y .et al. A Possible Extension of the Scutum-Centaurus Arm into the Outer Second Quadrant. Astrophys. J. Let. 798, L27 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Li, H.-K. et al. Oxygen isotopic ratios toward molecular clouds in the Galactic disk. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 16, 47 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Molecular Clouds in the Extreme Outer Galaxy between l = 34.°75 to 45.°25

    Sun, Y .et al. Molecular Clouds in the Extreme Outer Galaxy between l = 34.°75 to 45.°25. Astrophys. Js 230, 17 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Jackson, J. M. et al. The Boston University-Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory Galactic Ring Survey. Astrophys. Js 163, 145–159 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Pietrzy´nski, G. et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent.Nature 567, 200–203 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Graczyk, D. et al. A Distance Determination to the Small Magellanic Cloud with an Accuracy of Better than Two Percent Based on Late-type Eclipsing Binary Stars. Astrophys. J. 904, 13 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Rich, J. A. et al. A New Cepheid Distance Measurement and Method for NGC 6822. Astrophys. J. 794, 107 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Whiting, M. T. DUCHAMP: a 3D source finder for spectral-line data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 3242–3256 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Di Teodoro, E. M. & Fraternali, F. 3D BAROLO: a new 3D algorithm to derive rotation curves of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 3021–3033 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Mangum, J. G. & Shirley, Y . L. How to Calculate Molecular Column Density.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 127, 266 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Tang, X. D. et al. Kinetic temperature of massive star forming molecular clumps measured with formaldehyde. Astron. Astrophys. 598, A30 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Chira, R. A. et al. Characterization of infrared dark clouds. NH 3 observations of an absorption- contrast selected IRDC sample. Astron. Astrophys. 552, A40 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Fehér, O. et al. Ammonia Emission in Various Star-forming Environments: A Pilot Study of Planck Galactic Cold Clumps. Astrophys. Js 258, 17 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    P., Hayashi, M., Gatley, I., Hasegawa, T

    Garden, R. P., Hayashi, M., Gatley, I., Hasegawa, T. & Kaifu, N. A Spectroscopic Study of the DR 21 Outflow Source. III. The CO Line Emission. Astrophys. J. 374, 540 (1991)

    1991

  58. [66]

    H., Sneden, C., Kim, H

    Lacy, J. H., Sneden, C., Kim, H. & Jaffe, D. T. H2, CO, and Dust Absorption through Cold Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 838, 66 (2017). 28/32

    2017

  59. [67]

    Fujii, K. et al. Dense Molecular Clumps Associated with the Large Magellanic Cloud Supergiant Shells LMC 4 and LMC 5. Astrophys. J. 796, 123 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    Condon, J. J. Errors in Elliptical Gaussian Fits. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.109, 166–172 (1997)

    1997

  61. [69]

    E., Shirley, Y

    Mueller, K. E., Shirley, Y . L., Evans, I., Neal J. & Jacobson, H. R. The Physical Conditions for Massive Star Formation: Dust Continuum Maps and Modeling. Astrophys. Js 143, 469–497 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    Wouterloot, J. G. A. & Brand, J. IRAS sources beyond the solar circle. VII. The ˆ12 ˆC/ˆ13 ˆC ratio in the far outer Galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 119, 439–457 (1996)

    1996

  63. [71]

    N., Savage, C., Brewster, M

    Milam, S. N., Savage, C., Brewster, M. A., Ziurys, L. M. & Wyckoff, S. The 12C/13C Isotope Gradient Derived from Millimeter Transitions of CN: The Case for Galactic Chemical Evolution. Astrophys. J. 634, 1126–1132 (2005)

    2005

  64. [72]

    An improved method to measure 12C/13 and 14N/15N abundance ratios: revisiting CN isotopologues in the Galactic outer disc

    Sun, Y .et al. An improved method to measure 12C/13 and 14N/15N abundance ratios: revisiting CN isotopologues in the Galactic outer disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 527, 8151–8192 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Sz˝ ucs, L., Glover, S. C. O. & Klessen, R. S. The12CO/13CO ratio in turbulent molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 4055–4072 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    Dickman, R. L. The ratio of carbon monoxide to molecular hydrogen in interstellar dark clouds. Astrophys. Js 37, 407–427 (1978)

    1978

  67. [75]

    A., Langer, W

    Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D. & Wilson, R. W. The relationship between carbon monoxide abundance and visual extinction in interstellar clouds. Astrophys. J. 262, 590–605 (1982)

    1982

  68. [76]

    Romano, D., Matteucci, F., Zhang, Z.-Y ., Ivison, R. J. & Ventura, P. The evolution of CNO isotopes: the impact of massive stellar rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 2838–2854 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    Glover, S. C. O. & Clark, P. C. Star formation in metal-poor gas clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 377–388 (2012)

    2012

  70. [78]

    & Goldsmith, P

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T. & Goldsmith, P. F. Low Virial Parameters in Molecular Clouds: Implications for High-mass Star Formation and Magnetic Fields. Astrophys. J. 779, 185 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    Meidt, S. E. et al. A Model for the Onset of Self-gravitation and Star Formation in Molecular Gas Governed by Galactic Forces. I. Cloud-scale Gas Motions. Astrophys. J. 854, 100 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    Physical conditions of molecular gas in the Circinus galaxy Multi-J CO and Ci 3PP0 observations

    Zhang, Z.-Y .et al. Physical conditions of molecular gas in the Circinus galaxy Multi-J CO and Ci 3PP0 observations. Astron. Astrophys. 568, A122 (2014)

    2014

  73. [81]

    Papadopoulos, P. P. & Seaquist, E. R. The State of the Molecular Gas in a Luminous Starburst/Seyfert 2 Galaxy: NGC 1068 Revisited. Astrophys. J. 516, 114–126 (1999)

    1999

  74. [82]

    Elmegreen, B. G. Magnetic diffusion and ionization fractions in dense molecular clouds: the role of charged grains. Astrophys. J. 232, 729–739 (1979)

    1979

  75. [83]

    On the origin of cosmic-ray ionisation in star-forming regions

    Padovani, M. On the origin of cosmic-ray ionisation in star-forming regions. In Physics and Chemistry of Star Formation: The Dynamical ISM Across Time and Spatial Scales, 237 (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    Crutcher, R. M. Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 29–63 (2012)

    2012

  77. [85]

    Ching, T. C. et al. An early transition to magnetic supercriticality in star formation. Nature 601, 49–52 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    & Li, H.-b

    Cao, Z. & Li, H.-b. Turbulence in Zeeman Measurements from Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. Let. 946, L46 (2023). 29/32

    2023

  79. [87]

    & Roy, S

    Basu, A. & Roy, S. Magnetic fields in nearby normal galaxies: energy equipartition. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433, 1675–1686 (2013)

    2013

  80. [88]

    Magnetic fields in the nearby spiral galaxy IC 342: A multi-frequency radio polarization study

    Beck, R. Magnetic fields in the nearby spiral galaxy IC 342: A multi-frequency radio polarization study. Astron. Astrophys. 578, A93 (2015)

    2015

  81. [89]

    & Chen, W

    Li, D., Kauffmann, J., Zhang, Q. & Chen, W. Massive Quiescent Cores in Orion: Dynamical State Revealed by High-resolution Ammonia Maps. Astrophys. J. Let. 768, L5 (2013)

    2013

  82. [90]

    Wang, K., Wang, Y . & Xu, F. Massive Star Formation Starts in Subvirial Dense Clumps Unless Resisted by Strong Magnetic Fields. Astrophys. J. Let. 974, L6 (2024)

    2024

  83. [91]

    & Scoville, N

    Koda, J., Sawada, T., Hasegawa, T. & Scoville, N. Z. The Elongations and Supersonic Motions of Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 638, 191–195 (2006)

    2006

  84. [92]

    C., Krumholz, M

    Tan, J. C., Krumholz, M. R. & McKee, C. F. Equilibrium Star Cluster Formation. Astrophys. J. Let. 641, L121–L124 (2006)

    2006

  85. [93]

    & Nordlund, Å

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Haugbølle, T. & Nordlund, Å. Supernova Driving. I. The Origin of Molecular Cloud Turbulence. Astrophys. J. 822, 11 (2016)

    2016

  86. [94]

    J., James, P

    Aouad, C. J., James, P. A. & Chilingarian, I. V . Coupling local to global star formation in spiral galaxies: the effect of differential rotation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 5211–5226 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    J., Miville-Deschênes, M.-A

    Lee, E. J., Miville-Deschênes, M.-A. & Murray, N. W. Observational Evidence of Dynamic Star Formation Rate in Milky Way Giant Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 833, 229 (2016)

    2016

  88. [96]

    Elia, D. et al. The Star Formation Rate of the Milky Way as Seen by Herschel. Astrophys. J. 941, 162 (2022)

    2022

  89. [97]

    Lada, C. J. Star formation: from ob associations to protostars. In Symposium-International astronomical union, vol. 115, 1–18 (Cambridge University Press, 1987)

    1987

  90. [98]

    E., Klein, R

    Hansen, C. E., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F. & Fisher, R. T. Feedback Effects on Low-mass Star Formation. Astrophys. J. 747, 22 (2012)

    2012

  91. [99]

    Li, H. et al. Outflows and Bubbles in Taurus: Star-formation Feedback Sufficient to Maintain Turbulence. Astrophys. Js 219, 20 (2015)

    2015

  92. [100]

    Discovery of H2O, CH3OH, and OH Masers in the Extreme Outer Galaxy

    Sun, Y .et al. Discovery of H2O, CH3OH, and OH Masers in the Extreme Outer Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 869, 148 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Shirley, Y . L. The Critical Density and the Effective Excitation Density of Commonly Observed Molecular Dense Gas Tracers. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.127, 299 (2015)

    2015

  94. [102]

    Carilli, C. L. & Walter, F. Cool Gas in High-Redshift Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.51, 105–161 (2013)

    2013

  95. [103]

    Draine, B. T. Physics of the interstellar and intergalactic medium, vol. 19 (Princeton University Press, 2010)

    2010

  96. [104]

    Oka, T. et al. Statistical Properties of Molecular Clouds in the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 562, 348–362 (2001)

    2001

  97. [105]

    Dataset for the paper — Inadequate turbulent support in low-metallicity molecular clouds

    Lin, L. Dataset for the paper — Inadequate turbulent support in low-metallicity molecular clouds. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27282924 (2024)

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    Detection of the Keplerian decline in the Milky Way rotation curve

    Jiao, Y .et al. Detection of the Keplerian decline in the Milky Way rotation curve. Astron. Astrophys. 678, A208 (2023). 30/32 Supplementary Table 2: Measured quantities for molecular clouds observed by IRAM 30-m and SMT. *: Clouds with strong VLASS or NVSS continuum. Target l...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.