Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Magnetic Interactions in the Polar Ferrimagnet with a Bipartite Structure

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In Mn2Mo3O8, octahedral and tetrahedral spins produce separate magnon bands, and one spin model explains both the spectra and the ferrimagnetism.

desk verdict Solid INS study of Mn2Mo3O8 that provides a useful spin Hamiltonian, but the nine fitted parameters lack error bars and the DM dismissal is too quick. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07894 v1 pith:ONJITXDA submitted 2025-01-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Junbo Liao , Zhentao Huang , Bo Zhang , Yanyan Shangguan , Shufan Cheng , Hao Xu , Zihang Song , Shuai Dong
show 3 more authors
Devashibhai Adrojia Song Bao Jinsheng Wen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Mn2Mo3O8bipartitehoneycombstructuremagnondispersioninelasticneutronscatteringlinearspin-wavetheoryL-typeferrimagnetismsingle-ionanisotropymean-field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports inelastic neutron scattering on single crystals of Mn2Mo3O8, a polar magnet in the A2Mo3O8 family, and shows that its magnetic excitations consist of two distinct magnon dispersions: one associated with Mn ions in octahedral oxygen coordination and one with Mn ions in tetrahedral coordination. The authors claim that a single spin Hamiltonian combining Heisenberg exchange couplings and single-ion anisotropy terms, with parameters fitted to the data, describes both magnon bands quantitatively. Using the same effective model in a self-consistent mean-field calculation, they reproduce the unusual temperature dependence of the L-type ferrimagnetic susceptibility, in which a net moment appears just below the ordering temperature and then vanishes at low temperature. The paper reads this as evidence that the bipartite crystal structure, rather than only the individual ion properties, controls the spin dynamics and the L-type ferrimagnetism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin Hamiltonian of Eq. (1), which treats the two bipartite sublattices as distinguishable spin-5/2 degrees of freedom: inter-sublattice exchange $J_{i,j}$ between octahedral ($S$) and tetrahedral ($S'$) spins, intra-sublattice exchanges $J^O$ and $J^T$, and single-ion anisotropy terms $\Delta^O(S^z)^2$ and $\Delta^T(S'^z)^2$. The bipartite honeycomb structure, in which Mn ions occupy two crystallographically distinct oxygen-coordination sites, fixes the connectivity of these terms. The analysis combines linear spin-wave theory (implemented with the SPINW program) to fit the observed dispersions and a self-consistent mean-field approximation to compute the temperature-dependent sublattice moments, so the same parameter set explains both dynamic and thermodynamic data.

What would settle it

Measure the magnon spectrum of Mn2Mo3O8 in a magnetic field applied perpendicular to the c-axis so that the ordered moment tilts away from its zero-field direction; if a finite in-plane DM component exists, the tilt would activate it and alter the magnon gap or dispersion in a way the no-DM Hamiltonian cannot reproduce. Alternatively, fit the same inelastic neutron scattering data with a Hamiltonian that includes the allowed in-plane DM term and compare the goodness of fit and the resulting exchange parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the magnon spectrum of Mn2Mo3O8 separates into a higher-energy band (maximum 6.8 meV at the K point) carried by the octahedral Mn spins and a lower-energy band (maximum 5.4 meV) carried by the tetrahedral Mn spins. The full spin-wave data, including a ~0.48 meV gap, are described by a Hamiltonian of Heisenberg exchanges among octahedral-tetrahedral, octahedral-octahedral, and tetrahedral-tetrahedral neighbors plus single-ion anisotropies with opposite signs for the two sites ($\Delta^O>0$, $\Delta^T<0$). Linear spin-wave theory with the fitted parameters yields four magnon branches that group into two observable pairs, matching the experiment. With the same parameters, self-consistent mean-field theory explains the L-type ferrimagnetism: the octahedral sublattice orders first because it carries the largest exchange $J_1^O$ and an easy-axis anisotropy, the tetrahedral sublattice is then dragged into antiparallel order through antiferromagnetic inter-sublattice couplings, and the different ordering rates produce a transient net moment that vanishes once both sublattices fully polarize.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, though symmetry-allowed in the a-b plane, has no component parallel to the ordered magnetic moment and therefore does not affect the spin waves; if that symmetry assessment is wrong, the fitted exchange parameters would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bipartite structure sets the excitation spectrum: octahedral and tetrahedral Mn spins have different leading exchange couplings and opposite anisotropy signs, which is why their magnon bands separate in energy.
  • The leading magnetic interactions in Mn2Mo3O8 are ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor couplings ($J_1^O$ and $J_1^T$), in contrast to other A2Mo3O8 compounds where the nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange dominates.
  • The same spin model reproduces the hallmark L-type ferrimagnet behavior: a net magnetization appears just below the ordering temperature and then decays toward zero as the sublattice moments fully polarize and compensate.
  • The fitted parameters imply that the octahedral sublattice orders first; the antiferromagnetic inter-sublattice exchange drags the tetrahedral sublattice into antiparallel order, and the difference in the alignment rates produces the transient net moment.
  • The effective model provides a basis for computing other properties of Mn2Mo3O8, such as field-dependent magnon spectra or magnetoelectric responses, within linear spin-wave theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the DM-exclusion argument is correct, field-dependent neutron scattering with the field applied along the easy c-axis should leave the magnon gap essentially unchanged; a measurable field-induced change would signal that an in-plane DM component becomes active once the moment tilts.
  • The fitted parameters could be used to predict the magnon dispersion in lightly Fe- or Zn-doped Mn2Mo3O8, where the bipartite structure is preserved but site occupancies and anisotropies change, offering a testable interpolation within the A2Mo3O8 family.
  • The mean-field treatment neglects fluctuations, so the quantitative agreement near the ordering temperature could be sharpened by a more refined many-body method applied to the same effective Hamiltonian.
  • Polarized neutron scattering could directly confirm the assignment of the higher-energy band to octahedral spins and the lower-energy band to tetrahedral spins by measuring sublattice-resolved spectral weights.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports inelastic neutron scattering measurements on single crystals of the polar ferrimagnet Mn2Mo3O8 and observes two dispersive magnon bands. The authors fit a Heisenberg plus single-ion anisotropy Hamiltonian to the spectra using linear spin-wave theory, obtaining nine exchange/anisotropy parameters, and then use the same model in a self-consistent mean-field calculation to reproduce the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility and explain the L-type ferrimagnetism. The central claim is that the bipartite octahedral/tetrahedral structure controls the spin dynamics of this compound.

Significance. If the model is accepted, the paper provides a quantitative spin Hamiltonian for Mn2Mo3O8 and a concrete mechanism for the unusual L-type susceptibility, with implications for the broader A2Mo3O8 family. Strengths include the direct INS data, the transparent comparison of measured and simulated spectra using SpinW, and the cross-validation of the fitted model against an independent bulk susceptibility measurement, which is a genuine cross-validation rather than a circular derivation. The main weaknesses are the unquantified parameter fit, the reliance on an external anisotropy assignment, and a not fully justified exclusion of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, after Eq. (1)] The exclusion of in-plane DM interactions is not justified by the given argument. The statement that 'only the DM interaction with component parallel to the magnetic moment will contribute to the spin wave dynamics' is not a symmetry proof; in linear spin-wave theory an in-plane DM term generates terms linear in the transverse boson operators, which tilt the classical ground state and renormalize the quadratic magnon dispersion. Since the authors acknowledge that in-plane DM is symmetry-allowed in P63mc, and the single-ion anisotropy is small (Delta_O+Delta_T is approximately 0.08 meV), the fitted J values in Table I could be biased if any in-plane DM is present. Reference [52] concerns a kagome ferromagnet with out-of-plane DM and does not establish cancellation in Mn2Mo3O8. Please provide a Moriya-rule analysis of the DM vectors on the relevant bonds, or include DM terms in the model and report bounds on their magnitude.
  2. [Section III, Table I and text after Eq. (1)] The nine fitted parameters are reported without uncertainties, and the two single-ion anisotropies are not independently constrained by the INS data: the text states that LSWT gives the same gap for any split of Delta_O+Delta_T=0.08 meV with little distinction in fit quality, and the signs are imposed from Ref. [51]. Because the interpretation of octahedral easy-axis and tetrahedral easy-plane anisotropy, as well as the mean-field susceptibility calculation, depend on the individual values of Delta_O and Delta_T, please report confidence intervals or a Delta_O-Delta_T scan and discuss parameter correlations.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B2)-(B6)] The mean-field derivation contains an inconsistency that affects the reproducibility of the susceptibility claim. Equation (B2) states <S^z_i>=<S^z> for all sites, yet Eqs. (B3)-(B6) use distinct averages <S^z_o> and <S^z_t> for the two sublattices. In addition, the Zeeman term is written as -k_B S^z without defining the field value or units. Please clarify the two-sublattice mean-field ansatz, specify the field used in the calculation, and state explicitly that the comparison with the measured susceptibility is made after an arbitrary global rescaling. As written, the 'successfully reproduce' claim is qualitative and not fully reproducible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III, first paragraph] The sentence 'making it challenge to distinguish them' should read 'making it challenging to distinguish them'.
  2. [Section III, after Fig. 3] Please clarify why four calculated magnon branches reduce to two observable modes in the simulated intensities; a one-sentence spectral-weight explanation would remove ambiguity in the octahedral/tetrahedral assignment.
  3. [Appendix B] The symbol k_B is used for the Zeeman coupling, which conflicts with the standard Boltzmann constant; it should be renamed (e.g., h or mu_B B) and its value should be specified.
  4. [Fig. 1(d) caption] The caption says 'calculated net spin as shown in Fig. 4', but the comparison curve in Fig. 1(d) is a scaled susceptibility; please rephrase to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The paper is a fitting-plus-cross-validation study; no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The spin Hamiltonian parameters in Table I are obtained by fitting linear spin-wave theory to inelastic neutron scattering spectra (Section III, Fig. 3). The subsequent mean-field calculation of the L-type ferrimagnetic susceptibility uses those same fitted parameters, but on an independent observable (bulk magnetization versus temperature, Figs. 1(d) and 4). This is a cross-check, not a circular derivation: the susceptibility is not used to constrain the Hamiltonian, and the paper explicitly labels the calculation as reproducing or validating rather than predicting from first principles. The anisotropy signs are imported from prior THz work [51], an external experimental result, and the DM interaction is excluded via a cited symmetry argument [52]; both are modeling assumptions that could be wrong, but neither makes the central claim definitionally equivalent to its inputs. The only self-citations (Refs. [9,30]) are background context for topological magnons and magnon polarons and are not load-bearing for the Mn2Mo3O8 fit. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The spin Hamiltonian is a fitted phenomenological model; its parameters are not derived from first principles. The calculations further rely on linear spin-wave theory and mean-field theory, on a collinear spin configuration, and on the neglect of DM interactions and longer-range exchanges. No novel physical entities are proposed.

free parameters (10)
  • J1 = -0.118 meV
    Nearest-neighbor octahedral-tetrahedral exchange, fitted to INS data via LSWT; no error bar given.
  • J2 = 0.030 meV
    Second-neighbor octahedral-tetrahedral exchange, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • J3/J4 = -0.15 meV
    Further octahedral-tetrahedral exchanges treated as equal, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • J_O1 = 0.194 meV
    First-neighbor octahedral-octahedral exchange, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • J_O2 = 0.035 meV
    Second-neighbor octahedral-octahedral exchange, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • J_T1 = 0.159 meV
    First-neighbor tetrahedral-tetrahedral exchange, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • J_T2 = 0.015 meV
    Second-neighbor tetrahedral-tetrahedral exchange, fitted to INS data; no error bar given.
  • Delta_O = 0.085 meV
    Single-ion anisotropy of octahedral Mn, positive (easy axis); fitted, with sign from Ref [51].
  • Delta_T = -0.01 meV
    Single-ion anisotropy of tetrahedral Mn, negative (easy plane); fitted, with sign from Ref [51].
  • Global susceptibility scale factor = not specified
    Multiplication factor to compare the calculated spin moment with the measured susceptibility in Fig. 1(d); does not alter the temperature dependence.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Linear spin-wave theory validity
    The magnon dispersions are computed with LSWT, which assumes a classical ordered ground state and small spin deviations; this is standard for S=5/2 and low temperature (7 K).
  • standard math Mean-field approximation
    The susceptibility calculation uses a self-consistent homogeneous mean field (Appendix B), which neglects fluctuations and is expected to be approximate in the paramagnetic phase.
  • domain assumption Collinear ferrimagnetic order with moments along c
    The model assumes a collinear L-type ferrimagnetic ground state, based on prior magnetization and structural studies (Refs [23,28,43]), but no magnetic structure refinement is presented in this paper.
  • domain assumption S=5/2 local moments
    Mn2+ is treated as a high-spin S=5/2 ion with g approximately 2.14 and 2.08 from Curie-Weiss fits; this is well established for Mn2+.
  • domain assumption Limited exchange pathways
    The Hamiltonian includes only nearest-neighbor J1/J2 and next-nearest-neighbor J3/J4 and intrasublattice couplings up to second neighbor; additional exchange paths are neglected (Eq. 1).
  • domain assumption DM interaction absent
    The paper argues that symmetry allows an in-plane DM vector but its component parallel to the ordered moment is zero in this magnetic structure, so DM is omitted (Section III).
  • domain assumption Anisotropy signs from Ref [51]
    The individual signs of Delta_O and Delta_T are not determined by the INS data alone; the paper adopts Delta_O>0 and Delta_T<0 based on THz measurements in Ref [51].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic Interactions in the Polar Ferrimagnet with a Bipartite Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONJITXDA

@misc{pith2026250107894,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic Interactions in the Polar Ferrimagnet with a Bipartite Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONJITXDA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07894}
}
abstract

The polar magnets A$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$ (A=Fe, Mn, Co, and Ni) feature a bipartite structure, where the magnetic A$^{2+}$ ions occupy two different sites with octahedral and tetrahedral oxygen coordinations. This bipartite structure provides a platform for the emergence of nontrivial magnetoelectric (ME) effects and intriguing excitation behaviors, and thus creates significant research interest. In this study, we conduct inelastic neutron scattering measurements on single crystals of Mn$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$, an L-type ferrimagnet in the A$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$ family, to investigate its spin dynamics. The obtained magnetic excitation spectra reveal two distinct magnon dispersions corresponding to the octahedral and tetrahedral spins in Mn$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$. These magnon bands can be well described by a spin Hamiltonian including Heisenberg and single-ion anisotropy terms. Employing our effective spin model, we successfully reproduce the unusual temperature dependence of the L-type ferrimagnetic susceptibility through self-consistent mean-field theory. This research reveals the significance of the bipartite structure in determining the excitation properties of the polar magnets $\rm{A_{2}Mo_{3}O_{8}}$ and provides valuable insights into the spin dynamics of L-type ferrimagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07894 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic structures of the primitive cell of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) and (d) INS results of the magnetic excitation spectra along high-symmetry paths for the in-plane and out-of-plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparisons between the measured (EXP, left side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [51]

    Szaller, K

    D. Szaller, K. Sz´ asz, S. Bord´ acs, J. Viirok, T. R˜ o om, U. Nagel, A. Shuvaev, L. Weymann, A. Pimenov, A. A. Tsirlin, A. Jesche, L. Prodan, V. Tsurkan, and I. K´ ezsm´ arki, Magnetic anisotropy and exchange paths for octahedrally and tetrahedrally coordinated Mn2+ ions in the honeycomb multiferroic Mn2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [52]

    Chisnell, J

    R. Chisnell, J. S. Helton, D. E. Freedman, D. K. Singh, R. I. Bewley, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Topological magnon bands in a kagome lattice ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 147201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [1]

    Feldmeier, F

    J. Feldmeier, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Emergent Glassy Dynamics in a Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 040601 (2019)

    2019

  4. [2]

    Y. Shen, J. Sears, G. Fabbris, A. Weichselbaum, W. Yin, H. Zhao, D. G. Mazzone, H. Miao, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, R. Acevedo-Esteves, C. Nelson, A. M. Barbour, C. Maz- zoli, G. Cao, and M. P. M. Dean, Emergence of Spinons in Layered Trimer Iridate Ba 4Ir3O10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 207201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    Z. Yan, R. Samajdar, Y. Wang, S. Sachdev, and Z. Meng, Triangular lattice quantum dimer model with variable dimer density, Nat. Commun. 13, 5799 (2022). 7

    work page 2022

  6. [4]

    Y. Wang, H. Wu, G. McCandless, J. Chan, and M. Ali, Quantum states and intertwining phases in kagome ma- terials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 635 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [5]

    Ghimire and I

    N. Ghimire and I. Mazin, Topology and correlations on the kagome lattice, Nat. Mater. 19, 137 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [6]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 407 (2011)

    2011

Show all 56 references
  1. [7]

    M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041002 (2016)

    2016

  2. [8]

    L. Chen, J. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. Stone, A. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, and P. Dai, Topological Spin Excitations in Honeycomb Ferromagnet CrI3, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018)

    2018

  3. [9]

    S. Bao, J. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Cai, S. Li, Z. Ma, D. Wang, K. Ran, Z. Dong, D. Abernathy, et al., Discov- ery of coexisting Dirac and triply degenerate magnons in a three-dimensional antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 9, 2591 (2018)

    2018

  4. [10]

    F. Zhu, L. Zhang, X. Wang, F. Dos Santos, J. Song, T. Mueller, K. Schmalzl, W. Schmidt, A. Ivanov, J. Park, et al., Topological magnon insulators in two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets CrSiTe 3 and CrGeTe 3: Toward intrinsic gap-tunability, Sci. Adv. 7, eabi7532 (2021)

    2021

  5. [11]

    P. A. McClarty, Topological Magnons: A Review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 171 (2022)

    2022

  6. [12]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017)

    2017

  7. [13]

    L. S. and L. B., Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

  8. [14]

    J. Wen, S. Yu, S. Li, W. Yu, and J. Li, Experimental identification of quantum spin liquids, npj Quant. Mater. 4, 12 (2019)

    2019

  9. [15]

    Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  10. [16]

    Sharafullin, M

    I. Sharafullin, M. Kharrasov, and H. Diep, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in magnetoferro- electric superlattices: Spin waves and skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214420 (2019)

    2019

  11. [17]

    Vedmedenko, P

    E. Vedmedenko, P. Riego, J. Arregi, and A. Berger, In- terlayer Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257202 (2019)

    2019

  12. [18]

    Junquera, Y

    J. Junquera, Y. Nahas, S. Prokhorenko, L. Bellaiche, J. ´I˜ niguez, D. Schlom, L. Chen, S. Salahuddin, D. Muller, L. Martin, and R. Ramesh, Topological phases in po- lar oxide nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025001 (2023)

    2023

  13. [19]

    Kurumaji, S

    T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Doping- Tunable Ferrimagnetic Phase with Large Linear Magne- toelectric Effect in a Polar Magnet Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031034 (2015)

    2015

  14. [20]

    Y. Wang, G. L. Pascut, B. Gao, T. A. Tyson, K. Haule, V. Kiryukhin, and S.-W. Cheong, Unveiling hidden ferri- magnetism and giant magnetoelectricity in polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8, Sci. Rep. 5, 12268 (2015)

    2015

  15. [21]

    Chang, Y

    Y. Chang, Y. Weng, Y. Xie, B. You, J. Wang, L. Li, J. Liu, S. Dong, and C. Lu, Colossal Linear Magneto- electricity in Polar Magnet Fe 2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136701 (2023)

    2023

  16. [22]

    Y. S. Tang, S. M. Wang, L. Lin, C. Li, S. H. Zheng, C. F. Li, J. H. Zhang, Z. B. Yan, X. P. Jiang, and J.-M. Liu, Collinear magnetic structure and multiferroicity in the polar magnet Co 2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134112 (2019)

    2019

  17. [23]

    Kurumaji, S

    T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Diagonal mag- netoelectric susceptibility and effect of Fe doping in the polar ferrimagnet Mn 2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 95, 045142 (2017)

    2017

  18. [24]

    Y. S. Tang, J. H. Zhang, L. Lin, R. Chen, J. F. Wang, S. H. Zheng, C. Li, Y. Y. Zhang, G. Z. Zhou, L. Huang, Z. B. Yan, X. M. Lu, D. Wu, X. K. Huang, X. P. Jiang, and J.-M. Liu, Metamagnetic transitions and mag- netoelectricity in the spin-1 honeycomb antiferromagnet Ni2Mo3O8,...

    2021

  19. [25]

    Bertrand and H

    D. Bertrand and H. Kerner-Czeskleba, Structural and magnetic study of transition-element molybdates, J. Phys. 36, 379 (1975)

    1975

  20. [26]

    Strobel and Y

    P. Strobel and Y. Le Page, Growth and morphology of single crystals of hexagonal molybdates(IV) M 2Mo3O8 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni), J. Cryst. Growth 61, 329 (1983)

    1983

  21. [27]

    Strobel, Y

    P. Strobel, Y. Le Page, and S. P. McAlister, Growth and physical properties of single crystals of Fe II 2 MoIV 3 O8, J. Solid State Chem. 42, 242 (1982)

    1982

  22. [28]

    S. P. McAlister and P. Strobel, Magnetic order in M2Mo3O8 single crystals (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni), J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 30, 340 (1983)

    1983

  23. [29]

    Ideue, T

    T. Ideue, T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Giant thermal hall effect in multiferroics, Nat. Mater. 16, 797 (2017)

    2017

  24. [30]

    S. Bao, Z. Gu, Y. Shangguan, Z. Huang, J. Liao, X. Zhao, B. Zhang, Z. Dong, W. Wang, R. Kajimoto, et al., Direct observation of topological magnon polarons in a multifer- roic material, Nat. Commun. 14, 6093 (2023)

    2023

  25. [31]

    Kurumaji, Y

    T. Kurumaji, Y. Takahashi, J. Fujioka, R. Masuda, H. Shishikura, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Electro- magnon resonance in a collinear spin state of the po- lar antiferromagnet Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 95, 020405 (2017)

    2017

  26. [32]

    F. Wu, S. Bao, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Sun, J. Wen, Y. Wan, and Q. Zhang, Fluctuation-enhanced phonon magnetic moments in a polar antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 19, 1868 (2023)

    2023

  27. [33]

    Reschke, D

    S. Reschke, D. Farkas, A. Strini´ c, S. Ghara, K. Guratin- der, O. Zaharko, L. Prodan, V. Tsurkan, D. Szaller, S. Bord´ acs,et al., Confirming the trilinear form of the optical magnetoelectric effect in the polar honeycomb antiferromagnet Co 2Mo3O8, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 1 (2022)

    2022

  28. [34]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, C. Huang, Y. Qiu, G. Xu, J. Liebman, L. Chen, M. Stone, E. Feng, H. Cao, X. Wang, X. Xu, S. Cheong, S. Winter, and P. Dai, Disorder-induced ex- citation continuum in a spin- 1 2 cobaltate on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 024431 (2023)

    2023

  29. [35]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, X. Wu, M. Flynn, C. Duan, L. Chen, C. Huang, J. Liebman, S. Li, F. Ye, et al., Diffusive excitonic bands from frustrated triangular sublattice in a singlet-ground-state system, Nat. Commun. 14, 2051 (2023)

    2023

  30. [36]

    Reschke, A

    S. Reschke, A. A. Tsirlin, N. Khan, L. Prodan, V. Tsurkan, I. K´ ezsm´ arki, and J. Deisenhofer, Structure, phonons, and orbital degrees of freedom in Fe 2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094307 (2020)

    2020

  31. [37]

    Csizi, S

    B. Csizi, S. Reschke, A. Strini´ c, L. Prodan, V. Tsurkan, I. K´ ezsm´ arki, and J. Deisenhofer, Magnetic and vibronic terahertz excitations in Zn-doped Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. 8 B 102, 174407 (2020)

    2020

  32. [38]

    T. N. Stanislavchuk, G. L. Pascut, A. P. Litvinchuk, Z. Liu, S. Choi, M. J. Gutmann, B. Gao, K. Haule, V. Kiryukhin, S.-W. Cheong, and A. A. Sirenko, Spectro- scopic and first principle DFT + eDM F Tstudy of com- plex structural, electronic, and vibrational properties of M2Mo3...

    2020

  33. [39]

    Kurumaji, Y

    T. Kurumaji, Y. Takahashi, J. Fujioka, R. Masuda, H. Shishikura, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Opti- cal Magnetoelectric Resonance in a Polar Magnet (Fe, Zn)2Mo3O8 with Axion-Type Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077206 (2017)

    2017

  34. [40]

    Liu and G

    H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudospin exchange interac- tions in d7 cobalt compounds: Possible realization of the Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 014407 (2018)

    2018

  35. [41]

    R. Sano, Y. Kato, and Y. Motome, Kitaev-heisenberg hamiltonian for high-spin d7 mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 97, 014408 (2018)

    2018

  36. [42]

    Morey, A

    J. Morey, A. Scheie, J. Sheckelton, C. Brown, and T. Mc- Queen, Ni 2Mo3O8: Complex antiferromagnetic order on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 014410 (2019)

    2019

  37. [43]

    S. P. McAlister, Unusual ferrimagnetism in Mn 2Mo3O8 and Sm2In, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2343 (1984)

    1984

  38. [44]

    Arnold, J

    O. Arnold, J. C. Bilheux, J. M. Borreguero, A. Buts, S. I. Campbell, L. Chapon, M. Doucet, N. Draper, R. Fer- raz Leal, et al., Mantid—Data analysis and visualiza- tion package for neutron scattering andµSR experiments, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 764, 156 (2014)

    2014

  39. [45]

    R. A. Ewings, A. Buts, M. Le, J. van Duijn, I. Bustin- duy, and T. Perring, Horace: Software for the analysis of data from single crystal spectroscopy experiments at time-of-flight neutron instruments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth- ods Phys. Res., Sect. A 834, 132 (2016)

    2016

  40. [46]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  41. [47]

    N´ eel, Magnetic properties of ferrites: ferrimagnetism and antiferromagnetism, Ann

    L. N´ eel, Magnetic properties of ferrites: ferrimagnetism and antiferromagnetism, Ann. Phys. 12, 137 (1948)

    1948

  42. [48]

    Long, A M¨ ossbauer Effect And Magnetic Study of Fe2(SO4)3 and Fe2(MoO4)3, Two L-Type Ferrimagnets, in Chemical M¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy, edited by Herber, R

    G. Long, A M¨ ossbauer Effect And Magnetic Study of Fe2(SO4)3 and Fe2(MoO4)3, Two L-Type Ferrimagnets, in Chemical M¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy, edited by Herber, R. H. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1984) pp. 95–111

    1984

  43. [49]

    Saito, R

    T. Saito, R. Yamada, C. Ritter, M. Senn, J. Attfield, and Y. Shimakawa, Control of L-type Ferrimagnetism by the Ce/Vacancy Ordering in the A-Site-Ordered Perovskite Ce1/2Cu3Ti4O12, Inorg. Chem. 53, 1578 (2014)

    2014

  44. [50]

    Tiwari, D

    A. Tiwari, D. Kakarla, M. Hsieh, J. Lin, C. Wang, L. Tseng, C. Lu, A. Pal, T. Kuo, M. Chou, and H. Yang, Observation of magnetic field-induced second magnetic ordering and peculiar ferroelectric polarization in L-type ferrimagnetic Fe2(MoO4)3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 094412 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    G. L. Squires, Introduction to the theory of thermal neu- tron scattering (Courier Corporation, 1996)

    1996

  46. [54]

    Shirane, S

    G. Shirane, S. M. Shapiro, and J. M. Tranquada, Neu- tron scattering with a triple-axis spectrometer: basic tech- niques (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    Ravot, A

    D. Ravot, A. Mauger, and O. Gorochov, Magnetic sus- ceptibility of Sm 2In: theory and experiment, J. Alloy. Compd. 225, 461 (1995)

    1995

  48. [56]

    Nolting and A

    W. Nolting and A. Ramakanth, Quantum theory of mag- netism (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.