Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 59 references

Hybridization between surface flat bands and bulk bands in the topological nodal-line semimetal Sn$_{0.15}$NbSe$_{1.75}$ probed via soft-point-contact spectroscopy

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that asymmetric double peaks in the differential conductance of Sn0.15NbSe1.75 come from Fano interference between flat drumhead surface states and bulk bands, and that the resulting hybridization opens a pseudogap.

desk verdict New point-contact data on Sn0.15NbSe1.75, but the flat-band/hybridization interpretation rests on analogy and a borrowed scaling factor, not on evidence specific to this composition. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09721 v1 pith:RITA34WT submitted 2025-01-16 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

K. Kumarasinghe , C. Dissanayake , R. Munir , M. Tomlinson , Y. Nakajima This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords topologicalnodal-linesemimetalflatbandsdrumheadsurfacestatesFanoresonancepoint-contactspectroscopypseudogapuppercriticalfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that Sn0.15NbSe1.75, a superconducting topological nodal-line semimetal candidate, has flat surface bands derived from bulk nodal lines, and that these flat bands hybridize with bulk dispersive bands. The evidence is the shape of point-contact spectra: asymmetric double peaks in $\mathrm{d}I/\mathrm{d}V$ that fit a double Fano resonance model, with a peak separation that closes at 23 K. Interpreting that separation through an empirical conversion yields a 5.3 meV hybridization gap, and a pseudogap opens below 6.8 K with a matching gap-to-temperature ratio. If right, this places drumhead surface-state physics and surface-bulk hybridization at the center of this material's low-energy behavior, extending heavy-fermion-style hybridization phenomenology to topological flat bands.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the phenomenological double Fano resonance model $G_{\mathrm{DFR}}(V) = s[G_{\mathrm{FR}}(\varepsilon_+) + G_{\mathrm{FR}}(\varepsilon_-)] + G_0$, where each Fano term $G_{\mathrm{FR}}(\varepsilon) = |q-\varepsilon|^2/(1+\varepsilon^2)$ describes quantum interference between a discrete state and a continuum, here the flat surface band and the bulk band continuum, with $\varepsilon_\pm = (eV-\lambda\pm\Delta/2)/\Gamma$. The peak separation $\Delta$ is the hybridization energy scale; fitting $\Delta(T)=\Delta(0)\sqrt{1-(T/T_{\mathrm{hyb}})^2}$ gives $T_{\mathrm{hyb}}=23$ K, and an empirical factor $\eta=1.64$ taken from the heavy-fermion compound EuNi2P2 converts $\Delta$ into the hybridization gap $\Delta_{\mathrm{hyb}}$. The same fitted curve supplies the background against which the zero-bias pseudogap is isolated by normalizing the measured $\mathrm{d}I/\mathrm{d}V$ by $G_{\mathrm{DFR}}$.

What would settle it

A direct angle-resolved photoemission or scanning-tunneling measurement of Sn0.15NbSe1.75 that maps flat drumhead surface states near the Fermi energy and shows a ~5 meV hybridization gap closing near 23 K would settle the claim; observing the same double-peaked Fano line shape in a non-topological control compound, or showing the features vanish when the surface is modified, would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the normal-state differential conductance of Sn0.15NbSe1.75 carries a spectroscopic fingerprint of topological drumhead surface states: asymmetric double peaks near $\pm 4$ mV (at 14 T) that cannot be explained by thermal smearing or bulk resistivity, and that instead match a double Fano resonance. The model's peak separation $\Delta(T)$ closes at $T_{\mathrm{hyb}} = 23$ K, which the paper converts through an empirical scaling factor into a hybridization gap $\Delta_{\mathrm{hyb}}(0) = 5.3 \pm 0.1$ meV between the flat surface band and the bulk continuum. Below $T_{\mathrm{PG}} = 6.8$ K the same spectra show a pseudogap with $2\Delta_{\mathrm{PG}}(0)/k_BT_{\mathrm{PG}} \approx 5.8$, close to $2\Delta_{\mathrm{hyb}}(0)/k_BT_{\mathrm{hyb}} \approx 5.4$, and the paper reads this agreement as evidence that the pseudogap is hybridization-driven. It further reports that the upper critical field grows linearly with decreasing temperature from $0.4T_c$ down to $0.01T_c$, which it takes as a possible sign of an exotic superconducting state with spin-split Fermi surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the asymmetric double peaks in dI/dV are uniquely caused by Fano interference between a flat surface band and a bulk band continuum, with the fitted peak separation measuring a hybridization gap through a scaling factor borrowed from a different compound; if another mechanism produces the line shape, the central claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The ~5.3 meV hybridization gap and the 23 K closing temperature imply that surface flat bands in Sn0.15NbSe1.75 sit close enough to the Fermi energy to shape normal-state tunneling and transport.
  • Because $2\Delta_{\mathrm{hyb}}(0)/k_BT_{\mathrm{hyb}}$ and $2\Delta_{\mathrm{PG}}(0)/k_BT_{\mathrm{PG}}$ agree within quoted errors, the pseudogap below 6.8 K is attributed to the same surface-bulk hybridization rather than to an independent instability.
  • The near-constant resonance energy $\lambda \approx 0.48$ meV places the flat band within about half a millielectronvolt of the Fermi energy, so the drumhead states are active low-energy electronic states.
  • The linear-in-T upper critical field from $0.4T_c$ to $0.01T_c$ is inconsistent with standard Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg and dirty two-gap models, suggesting that pairing here involves spin-split Fermi surfaces, possibly a Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov-type state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the double-peaked Fano signature is generic for drumhead surface states, point-contact spectroscopy could serve as a fast bulk-sensitive screening tool for nodal-line flat bands before more expensive surface probes.
  • Beyond the paper: the empirical scaling factor $\eta=1.64$ taken from EuNi2P2 is the least anchored link in the chain; a direct measurement of the hybridization gap in Sn0.15NbSe1.75 by angle-resolved photoemission, scanning tunneling microscopy, or optics would test whether the 5.3 meV gap is real or a scaling artifact.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper's picture of a hybridization-driven pseudogap predicts that other flat-band/dispersive-band systems, such as kagome metals or twisted moiré materials, should show the same ratio $2\Delta/k_BT \approx 5$–$6$ across a flat-band-bulk hybridization crossover.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports soft-point-contact spectroscopy (PCS) on the off-stoichiometric compound Sn0.15NbSe1.75, a candidate topological nodal-line semimetal. In the normal state, the authors observe asymmetric double peaks in dI/dV, which they interpret as Fano resonance between topological drumhead surface flat bands and bulk bands. A phenomenological double-Fano model (Eq. 3) yields a peak separation Δ(T) that follows Δ(0)√(1-(T/T_hyb)²) with Δ(0)=8.37 meV and T_hyb=23 K. Using an empirical scaling factor η=1.64 from EuNi2P2, they convert Δ to a hybridization gap Δ_hyb(0)=5.3 meV. Below 7 K, a pseudogap-like dip appears; its amplitude 2Δ_PG(0)=3.4 meV and characteristic temperature T_PG=6.8 K give a ratio 2Δ_PG(0)/k_BT_PG=5.8, close to the hybridization-gap ratio 2Δ_hyb(0)/k_BT_hyb=5.4. The authors take this agreement as evidence that the pseudogap is hybridization-driven. In the superconducting state, they observe a zero-bias conductance peak (likely extrinsic) and a linear-in-T upper critical field below 0.4T_c, which they suggest may indicate an exotic superconducting state. The paper concludes that Sn0.15NbSe1.75 hosts surface flat bands and surface-bulk hybridization.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, these results would provide experimental evidence for drumhead surface flat bands in the SnxNbSe2−δ family and for a hybridization-driven pseudogap analogous to heavy-fermion systems, which would be a notable step toward understanding flat-band physics in topological semimetals. The manuscript has several strengths: the point-contact spectra are presented over a wide temperature and field range; the authors carefully rule out the thermal regime for their junctions; they explicitly acknowledge that the ZBCP is likely of extrinsic origin; and they are transparent about the lack of theoretical predictions for the off-stoichiometric composition and about the need for further studies of the Hc2 behavior. However, the central claim rests on two load-bearing assumptions that are not independently verified: the existence of topological surface flat bands in the specific off-stoichiometric compound, and the validity of the scaling factor η imported from EuNi2P2. As a result, the evidence is suggestive but not yet conclusive.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, after Fig. 2] The central identification of the asymmetric double peaks with Fano interference between surface flat bands and bulk bands rests on the assumption that Sn0.15NbSe1.75 is a topological nodal-line semimetal with drumhead surface states. The manuscript itself states that "theoretical predictions to off-stoichiometric Sn0.15NbSe1.75 are currently lacking" and proposes this "from analogy to the stoichiometric SnNbSe2." Because 15% Sn intercalation and 25% Se deficiency can shift the chemical potential, introduce disorder, or destroy the nodal lines, this premise is load-bearing. Please provide band-structure calculations for the specific composition or a direct surface-sensitive probe (e.g., ARPES), or reframe the paper's claims as a candidate interpretation rather than a demonstrated effect.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (3) and Fig. 4(a)] The conversion Δ → Δ_hyb using η=1.64 from EuNi2P2 is not justified. The ratio of the fitted peak separation to the actual hybridization gap is expected to be material-dependent; the observation of a similar temperature dependence in EuNi2P2 does not establish the same numerical scale factor in Sn0.15NbSe1.75. Since the derived Δ_hyb(0)=5.3 meV is then used in the ratio 2Δ_hyb(0)/k_BT_hyb that is compared with the pseudogap ratio, the main "same mechanism" claim depends on this unvalidated number. Please either fit the data to a microscopic hybridization model, determine Δ_hyb independently, or explicitly treat η as an uncontrolled parameter and assess how the central conclusion changes.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 5] The pseudogap amplitude is defined by the deviation of (dI/dV)/G_DFR from unity, where G_DFR is the double-Fano fit used as the background. This makes the pseudogap and the Fano background non-independent: any low-temperature deviation from the model is, by construction, labeled a pseudogap. The agreement between the ratios 2Δ_hyb(0)/k_BT_hyb and 2Δ_PG(0)/k_BT_PG is therefore at least partly a property of the fitting procedure. Please demonstrate that the pseudogap feature survives when the background is modeled differently (e.g., a smooth polynomial or a two-band tunneling model).
  4. [Section III, Eq. (3)] The double-Fano model is not tested against alternative line-shape models. Asymmetric double peaks in point-contact spectra can also arise from two independent tunneling channels, superconducting proximity effects, contact inhomogeneities, or multiband tunneling. Please fit the data with at least one alternative model and report quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ²) to support the uniqueness of the Fano interpretation.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction, p. 2] The phrase "topological nodals line semimetal" contains a typo and should read "topological nodal-line semimetal."
  2. [Introduction, p. 2] The word "anomalus" should be "anomalous."
  3. [Fig. 1(c,d)] The definition of the ZBCP height is not precise; please specify whether it is the zero-bias conductance relative to a linear background or to the conductance at a fixed voltage.
  4. [Section III, Eq. (3)] The parameter s in Eq. (3) is not defined beyond "a scaling factor"; please clarify whether it is a constant or voltage-dependent, and provide its fitted value.
  5. [Section III, Fig. 6(a)] The normalization (dI/dV)_n = [dI/dV(V)]/[dI/dV(−5 mV)] is used for the superconducting spectra, but the Fano background is asymmetric; please justify why −5 mV is a suitable normalization point.
  6. [Section III, Fig. 6(b)] The WHH fit with λ_SO=1.1 is stated without justification; please provide a reference or a physical argument for this value, and propagate the uncertainty in λ_SO into the fitted curve.
  7. [Section III, after Fig. 5] The uncertainty quoted for 2Δ_hyb(0)/k_BT_hyb does not include the uncertainty in η; please propagate all errors when comparing the two ratios.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fano-fit and gap-ratio comparisons are empirical consistency checks rather than equations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

The central inference chain is not circular by construction. The double-Fano model (Eq. 3) is a two-peak line shape fitted to the dI/dV data; its fitted peak separation Delta is converted to a 'hybridization gap' Delta_hyb using an empirical scaling factor eta=1.64 taken from EuNi2P2 (Ref. 41), not from the same data. The pseudogap amplitude 2Delta_PG is defined as the residual deviation of the normalized conductance from that same fitted G_DFR, so the two gap scales are extracted from the same spectra, but no equation forces the ratio 2Delta_PG(0)/kB T_PG = 5.8 to match 2Delta_hyb(0)/kB T_hyb = 5.4; the agreement is an empirical consistency check, not a tautology. The paper explicitly acknowledges its load-bearing topological premise is an analogy: 'While theoretical predictions to off-stoichiometric Sn0.15NbSe1.75 are currently lacking, we propose that Sn0.15NbSe1.75 is a topological nodal-line semimetal from analogy to the stoichiometric SnNbSe2.' That is an evidentiary gap concerning model uniqueness and off-stoichiometric band structure, which belongs to correctness risk rather than circularity. Refs. [24,25] are self-citations for sample growth and prior superconducting characterization, but the nodal-line premise rests mainly on the external calculation [26] and on the new point-contact data; the self-citations are not load-bearing in the derivation. I find no circular step satisfying the 'by construction' or 'fitted parameter renamed as prediction' test; the score of 2 reflects only the minor structural role of the authors' own prior 'topological nodal-line semimetal candidate' characterization.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim relies on: (1) the analogy from SnNbSe2 to the off-stoichiometric compound, (2) the Fano interpretation of the conductance line shape, (3) the transfer of the eta scaling factor from EuNi2P2, (4) empirical gap-closing forms, and (5) the Kondo expression for Gamma(T). None of these is independently evidenced in the paper, and the pseudogap ratio check is internal to the fits. The Hc2 analysis additionally assumes the applicability of WHH theory and a chosen lambda_SO.

free parameters (8)
  • Peak separation Delta(0) (hybridization gap proxy) = 8.37 +/- 0.04 meV
    Fit parameter in the double Fano model (Eq. 3 and Fig. 4a), later converted to Delta_hyb(0)=5.3 meV using eta from EuNi2P2.
  • Hybridization temperature T_hyb = 23 +/- 1 K
    Extracted from fitting Delta(T) = Delta(0)*sqrt(1-(T/T_hyb)^2) to the temperature dependence of the Fano peak separation.
  • Resonance energy lambda = 0.48 meV (average over T)
    Fitted parameter in Eq. 3, interpreted as the flat-band energy relative to the chemical potential.
  • Fano broadening parameters alpha and T_K = alpha = 4.0 +/- 0.1, T_K = 31.0 +/- 0.4 K
    Fitted to Gamma(T) = sqrt((alpha*k_B*T)^2 + 2*(k_B*T_K)^2), a single-site Kondo expression adopted without microscopic justification for this material.
  • Pseudogap amplitude 2Delta_PG(0) = 3.4 +/- 0.1 meV
    Fit parameter for the zero-bias dip observed below 7 K, defined as deviation from the double Fano model (Fig. 5).
  • Pseudogap temperature T_PG = 6.8 +/- 0.2 K
    Fit parameter from 2Delta_PG(T) = 2Delta_PG(0)*sqrt(1-(T/T_PG)^2).
  • Scaling factor eta from EuNi2P2 = 1.64 +/- 0.03
    Borrowed from point-contact work on EuNi2P2 to convert Fano peak separation Delta into hybridization gap Delta_hyb; its transferability to Sn0.15NbSe1.75 is assumed.
  • WHH spin-orbit scattering parameter lambda_SO = 1.1
    Chosen to match the measured Hc2(T) above 2 K; the Maki parameter alpha_M=0.88 is derived from the initial slope and Pauli limit.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Sn0.15NbSe1.75 is a topological nodal-line semimetal with drumhead surface flat bands by analogy to stoichiometric SnNbSe2.
    The paper states theoretical predictions for the measured composition are lacking and infers the topological character from the parent compound (Section III, nodal-line discussion).
  • domain assumption The asymmetric double peaks in dI/dV are caused by Fano interference between a localized flat band and a continuum bulk band.
    No microscopic model or independent surface probe is given; the double Fano model is adopted from heavy-fermion point-contact spectroscopy (Section III, Eq. 3).
  • domain assumption The Fano peak separation Delta is proportional to the bulk hybridization gap with the same proportionality eta as in EuNi2P2.
    The scaling factor is taken from Ref. [41] and applied without independent calibration in this material (Section III, Fig. 4a).
  • ad hoc to paper The temperature dependence of the gap follows Delta(T)=Delta(0)*sqrt(1-(T/T_hyb)^2).
    An empirical expression used to extract T_hyb and T_PG; the underlying mean-field or two-fluid justification is not established for surface-bulk hybridization.
  • ad hoc to paper The broadening Gamma(T) follows a single-site Kondo resonance expression in a nodal-line semimetal.
    The Kondo form is chosen by analogy to heavy-fermion systems, but no Kondo impurities or f-electrons are present in this material.
  • standard math WHH theory with alpha_M and lambda_SO describes Hc2(T) in the conventional regime.
    Usage of Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg theory as background for fitting the upper critical field (Section III, Fig. 6b).
  • domain assumption The junction is in the spectroscopic regime and not the thermal regime.
    The thermal-regime check (Fig. 3) rules out local heating but assumes the Wiedemann-Franz law and the validity of Eq. 1.
invented entities (1)
  • Drumhead surface flat bands in Sn0.15NbSe1.75
    purpose: Provide the localized state needed for Fano interference and the hybridization gap that explains the pseudogap.
    The bands are inferred from fitting dI/dV with a phenomenological Fano model and from analogy to SnNbSe2; no ARPES, STM, or calculation for this composition is presented, and no quantitative prediction testable beyond the fit is made.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybridization between surface flat bands and bulk bands in the topological nodal-line semimetal Sn$_{0.15}$NbSe$_{1.75}$ probed via soft-point-contact spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RITA34WT

@misc{pith2026250109721,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybridization between surface flat bands and bulk bands in the topological nodal-line semimetal Sn$_0.15$NbSe$_1.75$ probed via soft-point-contact spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RITA34WT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09721}
}
abstract

We report a detailed study of soft-point-contact spectroscopy of the superconducting topological nodal-line semimetal Sn$_{0.15}$NbSe$_{1.75}$ with the superconducting transition temperature $T_{c}=9.5$ K. In the normal state, we observe prominent asymmetric double peaks in the differential conductance $dI/dV$. The asymmetric $dI/dV$ curves are attributed to Fano resonance, quantum interference between two distinct tunneling paths of transmitting electrons into flat energy bands and dispersive bands. A phenomenological double Fano resonance model reveals the hybridization between these bands below the hybridization temperature $T_{\mathrm{hyb}}=23$ K. This hybridization drives an opening of a pseudogap below a characteristic temperature $T_{\mathrm{PG}}=6.8$ K. In the superconducting state, we observe an unusual upper critical field that increases linearly with decreasing temperatures from $0.4T_{c}$ to $0.01T_{c}$, suggestive of a possible exotic superconducting state. Our results suggest the presence of surface flat energy bands that stem from nontrivial topological nature of nodal lines in the bulk band structure and the hybridization between the surface flat bands and bulk bands in Sn$_{0.15}$NbSe$_{1.75}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09721 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Differential conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Differential resistance dV/dI as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Temperature dependence of the peak separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Normalized differential conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized differential conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    01Tc, suggestive of a possible exotic superconducting state

    4Tc to 0. 01Tc, suggestive of a possible exotic superconducting state. Ou r results suggest the presence of surface flat energy bands that stem from nontrivi al topological nature of nodal lines in the bulk band structure and the hybridization between the su rface flat bands and bulk bands in Sn0. 15NbSe1. 75. I. INTRODUCTION Flat energy band systems repres...

    work page

  2. [2]

    in FIG.3. FIG. 2. dI/dV of Sn0. 15NbSe1. 75 in an applied magnetic field of 14 T. The magnetic field is applied along the c axis. For clarity, the dI/dV curves are successively shifted upward by 0.0015 Ω − 1. The blue solid lines are fits to the data using the double Fano resonance model, Eq.( 3). (b) Schematic dia- grams of density of states (DOS) for renor...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Tasaki, From Nagaoka’s Ferromagnetism to Flat- Band Ferromagnetism and Beyond: An Introduc- tion to Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard Model, Prog

    H. Tasaki, From Nagaoka’s Ferromagnetism to Flat- Band Ferromagnetism and Beyond: An Introduc- tion to Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard Model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 489 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional su- perconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Rev

    G. Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755 (1984)

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High- Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange Metal in Magic- Angle Graphene with near Planckian Dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    I. Das, X. Lu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Symmetry-broken Chern insulators and Rashba-like Landau-level crossings in magic-angle bi- layer graphene, Nat. Phys. 17, 710 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vish- wanath, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Frac- tional Chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600,...

    2021

  3. [11]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.- Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Obser- vation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüp- pel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evi- dence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe 2, Nature 622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Z. Li, J. Zhuang, L. Wang, H. Feng, Q. Gao, X. Xu, W. Hao, X. Wang, C. Zhang, K. Wu, S. X. Dou, L. Chen, Z. Hu, and Y. Du, Realization of flat band with possible nontrivial topology in electronic Kagome lattice, Sci. Adv. 4, eaau4511 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Wang, S. S. Tsirkin, Z. Guguchia, B. Lian, H. Zhou, K. Jiang, I. Belopolski, N. Shumiya, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, T. A. Cochran, H. Lin, Z. Wang, T. Neupert, S. Jia, H. Lei, and M. Z. Hasan, Negative flat band mag- netism in a spin–orbit-co...

    2019

  8. [16]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Ye, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxi- ras, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, Topolog- ical flat bands in frustrated kagome lattice CoSn, Nat. Commun. 11, 4004 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev, E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. van den Brink, M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin,...

    2020

  10. [18]

    L. Ye, S. Fang, M. Kang, J. Kaufmann, Y. Lee, C. John, P. M. Neves, S. Y. F. Zhao, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, D. C. Bell, O. Janson, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Hopping frustration-induced flat band and strange metallicity in a kagome m...

    2024

  11. [19]

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Topological nodal semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    R. Yu, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and X. Hu, Topological Node-Line Semimetal and Dirac Semimetal State in Antiperovskite Cu 3PdN, 8 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036807 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    H. Weng, Y. Liang, Q. Xu, R. Yu, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and Y. Kawazoe, Topological node-line semimetal in three-dimensional graphene networks, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045108 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Liu, D. Vanderbilt, and W. Duan, Topological nodal-line semimetals in alkaline- earth stannides, germanides, and silicides, Phys. Rev. B 93, 201114 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    N. B. Kopnin, T. T. Heikkilä, and G. E. Volovik, High-temperature surface superconductivity in topolog- ical flat-band systems, Phys. Rev. B 83, 220503 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Chang, P.-J

    T.-R. Chang, P.-J. Chen, G. Bian, S.-M. Huang, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopol- ski, G. Chang, B. Wang, F. Chou, A. Bansil, H.-T. Jeng, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological Dirac sur- face states and superconducting pairing correlations in PbTaSe2, Phys. ...

    2016

  17. [25]

    Guan, P.-J

    S.-Y. Guan, P.-J. Chen, M.-W. Chu, R. Sankar, F. Chou, H.-T. Jeng, C.-S. Chang, and T.-M. Chuang, Superconducting topological surface states in the noncentrosymmetric bulk superconductor PbTaSe 2, Sci. Adv. 2 (2016), 10.1126/sciadv.1600894

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Munir, K

    R. Munir, K. A. M. H. Siddiquee, C. Dissanayake, X. Hu, Y. Takano, E. S. Choi, and Y. Naka- jima, Unusual upper critical fields of the topo- logical nodal-line semimetal candidate Sn xNbSe2− δ , J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 23LT01 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Munir, K

    R. Munir, K. A. M. H. Siddiquee, C. Dissanayake, K. Kumarasinghe, X. Hu, Y. Takano, E. S. Choi, and Y. Nakajima, Unusual superconductivity in the topo- logical nodal-line semimetal candidate Sn xNbSe1− δ , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2164, 012008 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Chen, T.-R

    P.-J. Chen, T.-R. Chang, and H.-T. Jeng, Ab initio study of the PbTaSe 2-related superconducting topolog- ical metals, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165148 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Bian, T.-R

    G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, G. Chang, I. Be- lopolski, D. S. Sanchez, M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, C. Liu, B. Wang, C.-C. Lee, H.-T. Jeng, C. Zhang, Z. Yuan, S. Jia, A. Bansil, F. Chou, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topologi...

    2016

  22. [30]

    M. N. Ali, Q. D. Gibson, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Noncentrosymmetric superconductor with a bulk three- dimensional Dirac cone gapped by strong spin-orbit cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B 89, 020505 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    J. Wang, X. Xu, N. Zhou, L. Li, X. Cao, J. Yang, Y. Li, C. Cao, J. Dai, J. Zhang, Z. Shi, B. Chen, and Z. Yang, Upward Curvature of the Upper Critical Field and the V-Shaped Pressure Dependence of Tcin the Noncentrosymmetric Superconductor PbTaSe 2, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28...

    2015

  24. [32]

    Zhang, Z

    C.-L. Zhang, Z. Yuan, G. Bian, S.-Y. Xu, X. Zhang, M. Z. Hasan, and S. Jia, Superconducting properties in single crystals of the topological nodal semimetal PbTaSe2, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054520 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Sankar, G

    R. Sankar, G. N. Rao, I. P. Muthuselvam, T.- R. Chang, H. T. Jeng, G. S. Murugan, W.- L. Lee, and F. C. Chou, Anisotropic supercon- ducting property studies of single crystal PbTaSe 2, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 095601 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    H. Jang, V. Thi Anh Hong, J. Kim, X. Lu, and T. Park, Hybridization-Controlled Pseudogap State in the Quantum Critical Superconductor CeCoIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 076301 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Daghero and R

    D. Daghero and R. S. Gonnelli, Probing multi- band superconductivity by point-contact spectroscopy, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 043001 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Das and G

    S. Das and G. Sheet, A modular point con- tact spectroscopy probe for sub-Kelvin applications, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 103903 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Y. G. Naidyuk and I. K. Yanson, Point-Contact Spec- troscopy, Vol. 145 (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    W. K. Park, L. H. Greene, J. L. Sarrao, and J. D. Thompson, Andreev reflection at the normal- metal/heavy-fermion superconductor CeCoIn5 inter- face, Phys. Rev. B 72, 052509 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    G. Goll, T. Brugger, M. Marz, S. Kontermann, H. Löhneysen, T. Sayles, and M. Maple, Point- contact spectroscopy on heavy-fermion superconduc- tors, Physica B 378-380, 665 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    W. K. Park, P. H. Tobash, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, and L. H. Greene, Observation of the Hybridization Gap and Fano Resonance in the Kondo Lattice URu2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 246403 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Zhang, N

    X. Zhang, N. P. Butch, P. Syers, S. Ziemak, R. L. Greene, and J. Paglione, Hybridization, Inter-Ion Cor- relation, and Surface States in the Kondo Insulator SmB6, Phys. Rev. X 3, 011011 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    N. K. Jaggi, O. Mehio, M. Dwyer, L. H. Greene, R. E. Baumbach, P. H. Tobash, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thomp- son, and W. K. Park, Hybridization gap in the heavy- fermion compound UPd2Al3 via quasiparticle scattering spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165123 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Shiga, I

    M. Shiga, I. Maruyama, K. Okimura, T. Harada, T. Takahashi, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, Y. Ina- gaki, and T. Kawae, Evolution of lattice coher- ence in the intermediate-valence heavy-fermion com- pound EuNi2P2 studied by point contact spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 103, L041113 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    L. Yin, L. Che, T. Le, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Lee, D. Gnida, J. D. Thompson, D. Kaczorowski, and X. Lu, Point-contact spectroscopy of heavy fermion supercon- ductors Ce 2PdIn8 and Ce 3PdIn11 in comparison with CeCoIn5, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 205603 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Shiga, I

    M. Shiga, I. Maruyama, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, and T. Kawae, Electronic density of state in valence fluc- tuating kondo lattice systems studied by point-contact spectroscopy, Low Temp. Phys. 49, 876 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Inten- sities and Phase Shifts, Phys

    U. Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Inten- sities and Phase Shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961)

    1961

  39. [47]

    Maltseva, M

    M. Maltseva, M. Dzero, and P. Coleman, Electron Cotunneling into a Kondo Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 206402 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Yang, Fano effect in the point con- tact spectroscopy of heavy-electron materials, Phys

    Y.-f. Yang, Fano effect in the point con- tact spectroscopy of heavy-electron materials, Phys. Rev. B 79, 241107 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Nagaoka, T

    K. Nagaoka, T. Jamneala, M. Grobis, and M. F. Crom- mie, Temperature Dependence of a Single Kondo Impu- rity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077205 (2002) . 9

    2002

  42. [50]

    Gurevich, Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconduc- tors, Phys

    A. Gurevich, Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B 67, 184515 (2003)

    2003

  43. [51]

    Bristow, W

    M. Bristow, W. Knafo, P. Reiss, W. Meier, P. C. Can- field, S. J. Blundell, and A. I. Coldea, Competing pair- ing interactions responsible for the large upper criti- cal field in a stoichiometric iron-based superconductor CaKFe4As4, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134502 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Bristow, A

    M. Bristow, A. Gower, J. C. A. Prentice, M. D. Watson, Z. Zajicek, S. J. Blundell, A. A. Haghigh- irad, A. McCollam, and A. I. Coldea, Multiband description of the upper critical field of bulk FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184507 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Shibauchi, L

    T. Shibauchi, L. Krusin-Elbaum, Y. Kasahara, Y. Shi- mono, Y. Matsuda, R. D. McDonald, C. H. Mielke, S. Yonezawa, Z. Hiroi, M. Arai, T. Kita, G. Blatter, and M. Sigrist, Uncommonly high upper critical field of the pyrochlore superconductor KOs 2O6 below the enhanced paramagneti...

    2006

  46. [54]

    Tanaka and S

    Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Theory of Tunneling Spec- troscopy of d-Wave Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    Yamashiro, Y

    M. Yamashiro, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kashiwaya, Theory of tunneling spectroscopy in superconducting Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7847 (1997)

    1997

  48. [56]

    Sasaki, M

    S. Sasaki, M. Kriener, K. Segawa, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and Y. Ando, Topological Superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217001 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    P. A. Lee, Effect of Noise on the Current- Voltage Characteristics of a Josephson Junction, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 325 (1971)

    1971

  50. [58]

    L. Shan, H. J. Tao, H. Gao, Z. Z. Li, Z. A. Ren, G. C. Che, and H. H. Wen, s-wave pair- ing in MgCNi3 revealed by point contact tunneling, Phys. Rev. B 68, 144510 (2003)

    2003

  51. [59]

    He, Z.-X

    G. He, Z.-X. Wei, J. Brisbois, Y.-L. Jia, Y.-L. Huang, H.-X. Zhou, S.-L. Ni, A. V. Silhanek, L. Shan, B.- Y. Zhu, J. Yuan, X.-L. Dong, F. Zhou, Z.-X. Zhao, and K. Jin, Distinction between critical current effects and intrinsic anomalies in the point-contact Andreev reflection sp...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.