Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Cepheids in spectroscopic binary systems -- current status and recent discoveries

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports a tenfold increase in double-lined binary Cepheids, from six to sixty confirmed systems, plus nine new double-Cepheid binaries.

desk verdict A useful conference status report with a plausible order-of-magnitude census, but the 'confirmed 60' count needs a per-system table and sharper language before it is treated as a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09793 v1 pith:VC4G7DT3 submitted 2025-01-16 astro-ph.SR

Bogumi{l} Pilecki This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords CepheidsSB2spectroscopicbinariesdoublestellarmassesMagellanicCloudsbinaryevolutionmergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This status report describes a project to turn the handful of known Cepheids in double-lined spectroscopic binaries into a population large enough for statistical studies. The paper reports that sixty such systems are now confirmed, up from about six, with anticorrelated orbital motion detected for thirty-seven, and that nine new binary systems composed of two Cepheids have been spectroscopically confirmed when only one such system was known before. The goal is to use these systems to measure Cepheid masses directly, test the predicted mass-luminosity relation, and investigate the proposal that a large fraction of Cepheids formed through binary interactions and mergers. One system, OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347, is highlighted as the second known Cepheid of binary origin, with an orbital period of 58.6 days and a companion mass ratio of 0.56.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the photometric selection method for SB2 candidates: a Cepheid that is excessively bright for its pulsation period, has similar or redder colors, and has lower-than-average pulsation amplitude is flagged as a likely double-lined spectroscopic binary (SB2, a system whose spectrum shows lines from both stars and whose components' masses can therefore be measured). The candidates are then confirmed spectroscopically by detecting two sets of spectral lines moving in opposite directions. Orbital radial-velocity curves, supplemented by light-travel-time analysis of photometric time series for long-period systems, turn these detections into orbits and mass ratios.

What would settle it

Take the photometrically selected candidates outside the original 18-star calibration sample, obtain phase-resolved high-resolution spectra for each, and count how many show two sets of lines with anticorrelated radial velocities; if the confirmation rate falls much below 95% in the SMC or Milky Way, the reported sixty-system census and the binary fraction inferred from it are biased. A reader could also check whether a complete table of the 60 systems and their confirmation status exists, since 23 of them are claimed without detected anticorrelated orbital motion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a photometric selection criterion—Cepheids that are too bright for their period, have similar or redder colors, and pulsate with lower-than-average amplitude—is about 95% efficient at finding double-lined spectroscopic Cepheid binaries, and applying it has raised the confirmed count from six to sixty systems. Of these, 37 show clear orbital motion of both components, and 24 have preliminary orbital solutions. Nine newly confirmed binary double (BIND) Cepheid systems, each containing two Cepheids, bring the known double-Cepheid binaries from one to ten. The 58.6-day orbit of OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347 and mass ratios far from unity in several systems are presented as evidence that binary interactions, including mergers, can create Cepheids and shape their properties.

Load-bearing premise

The census rests on the assumption that a Cepheid that looks too bright for its period, has normal or redder colors, and pulses with lower amplitude is almost always a double-lined binary; that 95% efficiency was measured on only 18 Large Magellanic Cloud candidates and is then applied to the rest of the sample in the LMC, SMC, and Milky Way.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With 60 SB2 Cepheids instead of six, dynamical masses can be measured for dozens of Cepheids, turning the mass-luminosity relation from a sparsely tested curve into a directly calibrated one.
  • The nine confirmed BIND systems give the first sample in which two same-age, same-composition Cepheids can be compared, so models must reproduce both components' masses and pulsation periods at once.
  • Systems with orbital periods as short as 58.6 days and mass ratios far from unity imply that a significant fraction of Cepheids may be merger or mass-transfer products, which would change how their masses and luminosities are interpreted.
  • The enlarged sample should allow the Cepheid binary fraction in the Magellanic Clouds to be measured from spectroscopy rather than inferred from photometry or proper motions.
  • If the selection method transfers to the Milky Way, it should reveal SB2 Cepheids in the Galactic disk, where current surveys find mostly single-lined binaries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that a 95% efficiency on 18 candidates implies nearly all of the roughly 100 photometrically selected Magellanic Cloud candidates are binaries, so the true SB2 Cepheid population in those galaxies may be close to a hundred rather than sixty.
  • A natural extension is to map the SB2 Cepheid binary fraction as a function of pulsation period, environment, and metallicity, testing whether the high multiplicity expected from proper-motion studies is uniform across galaxies.
  • The BIND sample could sharpen the Cepheid mass-discrepancy problem: a model that fails to predict both masses and both pulsation periods of a same-age, same-composition pair would be ruled out more decisively than by single stars.
  • Monitoring the period change of OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347 over the next decade would test the merger interpretation, since a binary-origin first-crossing Cepheid might show a distinct period-evolution pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This conference-proceedings-style paper summarizes the current status of a project to find Cepheids in double-lined spectroscopic binary (SB2) systems. The main claims are that the number of known SB2 Cepheids has grown from about six to 60, that 37 of these show anticorrelated orbital motion and 24 have preliminary orbital solutions, and that nine new systems composed of two Cepheids (BIND Cepheids) have been confirmed, whereas only one was known before. The selection method, introduced in Pilecki et al. (2021), uses photometric criteria (excess brightness for the period, similar or redder colors, lower pulsation amplitudes) and was calibrated as approximately 95% efficient on 18 LMC candidates. The paper also highlights OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347, a double-mode Cepheid in a 58.6-day orbit, as a likely merger product and discusses its implications for Cepheid mass and evolution.

Significance. If the census is accurate, the paper reports an order-of-magnitude increase in the number of SB2 Cepheids, a population that enables direct mass measurements and constraints on binary interactions and merger origins of Cepheids. The work builds on a series of peer-reviewed publications by the author and collaborators, which is a strength; the orbital RV curves for the nine BIND systems and the detailed discussion of OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347 provide useful visual summaries and highlight a remarkable object. However, the central quantitative claims are made without the supporting data tables or a clear definition of what counts as 'confirmed,' and the extrapolation of the selection efficiency across galaxies is not justified in this manuscript. These issues need to be addressed before the headline numbers can be accepted as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, paragraph 2] The abstract states 'we have confirmed 60 SB2 systems,' but the body says only that the sample 'consists of 60 objects,' with 37 showing anticorrelated orbital motion and 24 having preliminary orbital solutions. The paper does not define what constitutes 'confirmed' for the remaining 23 objects, nor does it provide a table listing the 60 objects and their individual confirmation status (photometric candidate, detection of two line sets, anticorrelated orbital motion, or full orbital solution). Without such a table, readers cannot audit the central claim or distinguish spectroscopically confirmed SB2 systems from photometric candidates selected by the indirect method.
  2. [Section 4, paragraph 2] The claimed 95% detection efficiency is based on 17 of 18 analyzed LMC Cepheids (Pilecki et al., 2021; Pilecki, 2022) and is then applied to the full candidate sample in the LMC, SMC, and Milky Way. The Milky Way has different reddening and crowding, and the SMC has lower metallicity, so the transferability of the efficiency is not obvious. The paper provides no per-galaxy confirmation statistics or discussion of how the candidate selection differs across these environments. If the true efficiency is lower than 95%, the reported count of 60 confirmed SB2 systems and the inferred growth by an order of magnitude would be overstated; this is a load-bearing point that needs direct support.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Figure 1 caption] The caption states that for several systems the orbital period is 'set to match the data' rather than derived from an orbital solution or LTTE; this phrase is ambiguous and should be clarified, for example by saying the period is not well constrained by the current RV data and is adopted for plotting purposes.
  2. [Section 3, first paragraph] The text refers to 'nine candidates for new genuine binary double (BIND) Cepheids' and then says that spectroscopic observations 'proved the binarity of all of them'; the wording could mislead readers into thinking they are still candidates, so it would be clearer to state that the nine systems are now spectroscopically confirmed binaries.
  3. [Section 4, paragraph 1] The number 'about 100 such candidates in the Magellanic Clouds' is not referenced; please provide the exact count from Pilecki et al. (2021) or specify that it is a rough estimate.
  4. [General] The paper lacks a conclusions or outlook section; a brief summary of the current status and the next steps toward the goal of more than 100 SB2 systems would help readers place the reported numbers in context.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the reported SB2 and BIND Cepheid counts are observational updates supported by radial-velocity data, and the self-citations point to published data papers rather than unverified premises.

full rationale

This paper is a status report on an observational program, not a derivation chain, so there is no equation or fitted parameter that is renamed as a prediction. The growth in SB2 Cepheids (60 objects, 37 with anticorrelated orbital motion, 24 with preliminary orbits) and the nine new double-Cepheid systems are presented as spectroscopic results, with anticorrelated orbital motion called the ultimate proof of binarity. The selection method of Pilecki et al. (2021) uses photometric criteria, and its 95% efficiency was calibrated on 17 of 18 LMC candidates; extrapolating that rate to the larger LMC/SMC/Milky Way sample is a statistical transfer, not a definitional reduction. The abstract's 'confirmed 60 SB2 systems' is stronger than the body's 'sample ... consists of 60 objects', and the paper does not tabulate per-system confirmation status; these are evidentiary and terminology caveats, not circularity. The figure caption's statement that some orbital periods 'are set to match the data' is a modeling limitation, also not a circular step. The many self-citations are to published, data-bearing papers, which count as independent support under the review rules; no claim reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted in this status-report paper; the central numbers are observational counts. The main load-bearing assumptions are the photometric selection criteria for candidate SB2 Cepheids and the extrapolation of the 95% efficiency measured on 18 LMC objects to the full sample. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Cepheids that are excessively bright for their periods, with similar or redder colors and lower pulsation amplitudes are likely members of SB2 binaries.
    Section 4; this is the photometric selection criterion used to build the candidate sample that led to the 60 claimed SB2 systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The 95% detection efficiency measured on 18 LMC candidates (17/18) applies to the whole candidate sample in LMC, SMC, and MW.
    Section 4; the paper uses this single calibration to characterize a program covering different galaxies and metallicities.
  • domain assumption Residual radial velocity variations after subtracting pulsation are caused by orbital motion.
    Section 3 and Figure 1; all binary confirmations rest on this interpretation of the RV curves.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cepheids in spectroscopic binary systems -- current status and recent discoveries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VC4G7DT3

@misc{pith2026250109793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cepheids in spectroscopic binary systems -- current status and recent discoveries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VC4G7DT3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09793}
}
read the original abstract

We present a summary of the current knowledge about Cepheids in binary systems. We focus on the most recent findings and discoveries, such as the highly increasing number of confirmed and candidate spectroscopic binary Cepheids and the progress in determining their physical parameters. This includes new and newly analyzed binary Cepheids in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds. We will provide an update on the project to increase the number of the most valuable Cepheids in double-lined binary (SB2) systems from six to more than 100. To date, we have confirmed 60 SB2 systems, including detecting a significant orbital motion for 37. We identified systems with orbital periods up to five times shorter than the shortest period reported before and systems with mass ratios significantly different from unity (suggesting past binary interactions, including merger events). Both features are essential to understanding how multiplicity affects the formation and destruction of Cepheid progenitors and how this influences global Cepheid properties. We will also present nine new systems composed of two Cepheids. Only one such double Cepheid system was known before.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09793 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Orbital RV curves for nine new BIND Cepheids. Only for OGLE-SMC– CEP-2893 and OGLE-LMC-CEP-0571 do the orbital periods come from an orbital solution. For three SMC systems (1526, 2699, 3674) and one in the LMC (0835), the period is taken from the LTTE model, while for the rest, it is set to match the data and not to produce unphysical results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Preliminary orbits for four example double-lined binary Cepheids. The or￾bital period is not yet constrained for the last one. two less massive stars, which makes it the second known classical Cepheid of binary origin. The orbital and pulsational radial velocity curves are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (left) Orbital radial velocity curve with the 1O-mode pulsation of the Cepheid subtracted. The orbit is circular, and the amplitude ratio indicates the com￾panion is about 2 times less massive. (right) Pulsational RV curve for 1O mode with orbital motion subtracted. The scatter of the Cepheid RVs around the fits comes mostly from the unaccounted 2O pulsation. Bono, G., Braga, V. F., & Pietrinferni, A., Cepheids as d… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Axelrod , T

    Alcock , C., Allsman , R. A., Axelrod , T. S., et al. , The MACHO Project LMC Variable Star Inventory.I.Beat Cepheids-Conclusive Evidence for the Excitation of the Second Overtone in Classical Cepheids . 1995, , 109 , 1653, DOI: 10.1086/117392

    work page doi:10.1086/117392 1995

  2. [2]

    I., On Cepheid distances in the H_0 measurement

    Anderson , R. I., On Cepheid distances in the H_0 measurement . 2024, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.02801, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02801

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.02801 2024

  3. [3]

    I., Saio , H., Ekstr \"o m , S., Georgy , C., & Meynet , G., On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids

    Anderson , R. I., Saio , H., Ekstr \"o m , S., Georgy , C., & Meynet , G., On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids. II. Pulsation analysis for metallicities 0.014, 0.006, and 0.002 . 2016, , 591 , A8, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201528031

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528031 2016

  4. [4]

    I., Viviani , G., Shetye , S

    Anderson , R. I., Viviani , G., Shetye , S. S., et al. , VELOcities of CEpheids (VELOCE). I. High-precision radial velocities of Cepheids . 2024, , 686 , A177, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348400

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348400 2024

  5. [5]

    F., & Pietrinferni , A., Cepheids as distance indicators and stellar tracers

    Bono , G., Braga , V. F., & Pietrinferni , A., Cepheids as distance indicators and stellar tracers . 2024, , 32 , 4, DOI: 10.1007/s00159-024-00153-0

    doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00153-0 2024

  6. [6]

    Bono , G., Caputo , F., Castellani , V., & Marconi , M., Theoretical Models for Classical Cepheids. II. Period-Luminosity, Period-Color, and Period-Luminosity-Color Relations . 1999, , 512 , 711, DOI: 10.1086/306815

    doi:10.1086/306815 1999

  7. [7]

    , Classical Cepheid Pulsation Models

    Bono , G., Marconi , M., Cassisi , S., et al. , Classical Cepheid Pulsation Models. X. The Period-Age Relation . 2005, , 621 , 966, DOI: 10.1086/427744

    doi:10.1086/427744 2005

  8. [8]

    Cassisi , S. & Salaris , M., A Classical Cepheid in a Large Magellanic Cloud Eclipsing Binary: Evidence Of Shortcomings in Current Stellar Evolutionary Models? 2011, , 728 , L43, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/728/2/L43

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/728/2/l43 2011

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Espinoza-Arancibia , F., Pilecki , B., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Smolec , R., & Kervella , P., Empirical instability strip for classical Cepheids. I. The Large Magellanic Cloud galaxy . 2024, , 682 , A185, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347804

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., et al

    Evans , N. R., Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., et al. , The Orbit and Mass of the Cepheid AW Per . 2024 a , , 972 , 145, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e7d

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    R., Proffitt , C., Carpenter , K

    Evans , N. R., Proffitt , C., Carpenter , K. G., et al. , The Mass of the Cepheid V350 Sgr . 2018, , 866 , 30, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aade03

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    R., Schaefer , G

    Evans , N. R., Schaefer , G. H., Gallenne , A., et al. , The Orbit and Dynamical Mass of Polaris: Observations with the CHARA Array . 2024 b , , 971 , 190, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e7a

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    R., Kervella , P., et al

    Gallenne , A., Evans , N. R., Kervella , P., et al. , Multiplicity of Galactic Cepheids from long-baseline interferometry V. High-accuracy orbital parallax and mass of SU Cygni . 2024, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.06647, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06647

    2024 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    R., et al

    Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., Evans , N. R., et al. , A Geometrical 1\ Distance to the Short-period Binary Cepheid V1334 Cygni . 2018, , 867 , 121, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae373

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    , The Araucaria Project

    Gieren , W., Pilecki , B., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., et al. , The Araucaria Project. OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718: An Exotic Eclipsing Binary System Composed of Two Classical Overtone Cepheids in a 413 Day Orbit . 2014, , 786 , 80, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/80

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    , Multiplicity of Galactic Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars from Gaia DR2

    Kervella , P., Gallenne , A., Remage Evans , N., et al. , Multiplicity of Galactic Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars from Gaia DR2. I. Binarity from proper motion anomaly . 2019, , 623 , A116, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834210

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Leavitt , H. S. & Pickering , E. C., Periods of 25 Variable Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. 1912, Harvard College Observatory Circular , 173 , 1

    1912

  10. [18]

    H., Note on the Long-Period System of Polaris

    Moore , J. H., Note on the Long-Period System of Polaris . 1929, , 41 , 56, DOI: 10.1086/123907

    1929 doi

  11. [19]

    R., Izzard , R

    Neilson , H. R., Izzard , R. G., Langer , N., & Ignace , R., The strange evolution of the Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid OGLE-LMC-CEP1812 . 2015, , 581 , L1, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526716

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    2021, , 71 , 205, DOI: 10.32023/0001-5237/71.3.2

    Pietrukowicz , P., Soszy \'n ski , I., & Udalski , A., Classical Cepheids in the Milky Way . 2021, , 71 , 205, DOI: 10.32023/0001-5237/71.3.2

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    B., Gieren , W., et al

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Thompson , I. B., Gieren , W., et al. , The dynamical mass of a classical Cepheid variable star in an eclipsing binary system . 2010, , 468 , 542, DOI: 10.1038/nature09598

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    B., Graczyk , D., et al

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Thompson , I. B., Graczyk , D., et al. , The Araucaria Project: Accurate Determination of the Dynamical Mass of the Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing System OGLE-LMC-CEP-1812 . 2011, , 742 , L20, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L20

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    in , XL Polish Astronomical Society Meeting , ed

    Pilecki , B., Revealing a numerous population of double-lined binary Cepheids . in , XL Polish Astronomical Society Meeting , ed. E. Szuszkiewicz , A. Majczyna , K. Ma ek , M. Ratajczak , E. Niemczura , U. B a k-St e \'s licka , R. Poleski , M. Bilicki , & . Wyrzykowski , Vol....

  16. [24]

    2024, , 970 , L14, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5b54

    Pilecki , B., Fundamentalization of Periods for First- and Second-overtone Classical Cepheids . 2024, , 970 , L14, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5b54

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    , The Araucaria Project: High-precision Cepheid Astrophysics from the Analysis of Variables in Double-lined Eclipsing Binaries

    Pilecki , B., Gieren , W., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., et al. , The Araucaria Project: High-precision Cepheid Astrophysics from the Analysis of Variables in Double-lined Eclipsing Binaries . 2018, , 862 , 43, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacb32

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    , The Araucaria Project: the First-overtone Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing System OGLE-LMC-CEP-2532

    Pilecki , B., Graczyk , D., Gieren , W., et al. , The Araucaria Project: the First-overtone Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing System OGLE-LMC-CEP-2532 . 2015, , 806 , 29, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/29

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    , Physical parameters and the projection factor of the classical Cepheid in the binary system OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227

    Pilecki , B., Graczyk , D., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., et al. , Physical parameters and the projection factor of the classical Cepheid in the binary system OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227 . 2013, , 436 , 953, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1529

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    I., et al

    Pilecki , B., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Anderson , R. I., et al. , Cepheids with Giant Companions. I. Revealing a Numerous Population of Double-lined Binary Cepheids . 2021, , 910 , 118, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe7e9

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    B., Espinoza-Arancibia , F., et al

    Pilecki , B., Thompson , I. B., Espinoza-Arancibia , F., et al. , Discovery of a Binary-origin Classical Cepheid in a Binary System with a 59 day Orbital Period . 2022, , 940 , L48, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9fcc

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    B., Espinoza-Arancibia , F., et al

    Pilecki , B., Thompson , I. B., Espinoza-Arancibia , F., et al. , Cepheids with giant companions. II. Spectroscopic confirmation of nine new double-lined binary systems composed of two Cepheids . 2024, , 686 , A263, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349138

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Catalog of Variable Stars

    Pojmanski , G., Pilecki , B., & Szczygiel , D., The All Sky Automated Survey. Catalog of Variable Stars. V. Declinations 0 arcd - +28 arcd of the Northern Hemisphere . 2005, , 55 , 275, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0508017

    2005 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    S., Hajdu , G., Smolec , R., et al

    Rathour , R. S., Hajdu , G., Smolec , R., et al. , Non-evolutionary effects on period change in Magellanic Cepheids. I. New binary systems revealed from light travel time effect . 2024, , 686 , A268, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349117

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    G., Casertano , S., Yuan , W., Macri , L

    Riess , A. G., Casertano , S., Yuan , W., Macri , L. M., & Scolnic , D., Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1\ Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond CDM . 2019, , 876 , 85, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    G., Yuan , W., Macri , L

    Riess , A. G., Yuan , W., Macri , L. M., et al. , A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s ^ -1 Mpc ^ -1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team . 2022, , 934 , L7, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    , The VMC survey - XLVIII

    Ripepi , V., Chemin , L., Molinaro , R., et al. , The VMC survey - XLVIII. Classical cepheids unveil the 3D geometry of the LMC . 2022, , 512 , 563, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac595

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    E., de Koter , A., et al

    Sana , H., de Mink , S. E., de Koter , A., et al. , Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars . 2012, Science , 337 , 444, DOI: 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    S., Viviani , G., Anderson , R

    Shetye , S. S., Viviani , G., Anderson , R. I., et al. , VELOcities of CEpheids (VELOCE): II. Systematic search for spectroscopic binary cepheids . 2024, , 690 , A284, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450185

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    , The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

    Soszynski , I., Poleski , R., Udalski , A., et al. , The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. I. Classical Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud . 2008, , 58 , 163

    2008

  31. [39]

    K., et al

    Soszy \'n ski , I., Udalski , A., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., et al. , Additional Galactic Cepheids from the OGLE Survey . 2020, , 70 , 101, DOI: 10.32023/0001-5237/70.2.2

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    K., et al

    Soszy \'n ski , I., Udalski , A., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., et al. , Concluding Henrietta Leavitt's Work on Classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System and Other Updates of the OGLE Collection of Variable Stars . 2017, , 67 , 103, DOI: 10.32023/0001-5237/67.2.1

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    , Calibrating the Cepheid period-luminosity relation from the infrared surface brightness technique

    Storm , J., Gieren , W., Fouqu \'e , P., et al. , Calibrating the Cepheid period-luminosity relation from the infrared surface brightness technique. I. The p-factor, the Milky Way relations, and a universal K-band relation . 2011, , 534 , A94, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117155

    2011 doi

  34. [42]

    2003, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars , 5394 , 1

    Szabados , L., Database on Binaries among Galactic Classical Cepheids . 2003, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars , 5394 , 1

    2003

  35. [43]

    & Neh \'e z , D., Binarity among Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds

    Szabados , L. & Neh \'e z , D., Binarity among Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds . 2012, , 426 , 3148, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21872.x

    2012

  36. [44]

    G., Uncertainties on the theoretical predictions for classical Cepheid pulsational quantities

    Valle , G., Marconi , M., Degl'Innocenti , S., & Prada Moroni , P. G., Uncertainties on the theoretical predictions for classical Cepheid pulsational quantities . 2009, , 507 , 1541, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912004

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid....

  38. [46]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.