Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Chain-of-Reasoning: Towards Unified Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via a Multi-Paradigm Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11110 v4 pith:SEA2ZNMK submitted 2025-01-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningmodelslanguagemathematicaltasksacrosschain-of-reasoningcor-math-7b
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made notable progress in mathematical reasoning, yet often rely on single-paradigm reasoning, limiting their effectiveness across diverse tasks. We introduce Chain-of-Reasoning (CoR), a novel unified framework integrating multiple reasoning paradigms--Natural Language Reasoning (NLR), Algorithmic Reasoning (AR), and Symbolic Reasoning (SR)--to enable synergistic collaboration. CoR generates multiple potential answers via different reasoning paradigms and synthesizes them into a coherent final solution. We propose a Progressive Paradigm Training (PPT) strategy for models to progressively master these paradigms, leading to CoR-Math-7B. Experimental results demonstrate that CoR-Math-7B significantly outperforms current SOTA models, achieving up to a 41.0% absolute improvement over GPT-4o in theorem proving and a 15.0% improvement over RL-based methods on the MATH benchmark in arithmetic tasks. These results show the enhanced mathematical comprehension ability of our model, enabling zero-shot generalization across tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning How to Use Tools, Not Just When: Pattern-Aware Tool-Integrated Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage pattern-aware tool-integrated reasoning method raises code usage and code-plus-correct metrics on math benchmarks, but the paper conflates Code@1 with problem-solving accuracy in its headline claims.

  2. LLMs as World Models: Data-Driven and Human-Centered Pre-Event Simulation for Disaster Impact Assessment

    cs.CY 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors show that prompting LLMs with earthquake parameters, local building, demographic, and street view data yields Modified Mercalli Intensity estimates that track USGS 'Did You Feel It?' reports for the 2014 N...

  3. Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jointly training and voting across natural language, code, and truth-table reasoning modalities improves LLM logical reasoning accuracy by up to 11.7 percentage points.

  4. SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SwS uses failures during RL training to synthesize targeted math problems, improving reasoning accuracy on eight benchmarks.

Pith tools