Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Metallicity and Anomalous Hall Effect in Epitaxially-Strained, Atomically-thin RuO2 Films

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fully strained, atomically thin RuO2 films stay metallic and show a saturated anomalous Hall effect below 9 T, traced to strain-stabilized non-compensated magnetism.

desk verdict A strong growth-and-characterization paper with a credible but under-documented AHE extraction; the DFT is independent and the strain-driven non-compensated state is a real result, but the transport decomposition needs referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11204 v1 pith:5JAR3XJX submitted 2025-01-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Seung Gyo Jeong , Seungjun Lee , Bonnie Lin , Zhifei Yang , In Hyeok Choi , Jin Young Oh , Sehwan Song , Seung wook Lee
show 9 more authors
Sreejith Nair Rashmi Choudhary Juhi Parikh Sungkyun Park Woo Seok Choi Jong Seok Lee James M. LeBeau Tony Low Bharat Jalan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords RuO2thinfilmsmagnetismepitaxialstrainhybridmolecularbeamepitaxyanomalousHalleffectaltermagnetismmetallicitydensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to settle whether ultrathin RuO2 can be both metallic and magnetic, and to find the cause of its anomalous Hall effect. It reports that fully strained RuO2 layers as thin as 0.8 nm, sandwiched between TiO2 layers, stay metallic and show a nonlinear Hall signal that fits as an ordinary Hall term plus a saturated anomalous Hall term with $\rho_{\rm AHE} \approx 0.3\,\mu\Omega\,{\rm cm}$ at 1.8 K. Previous anomalous Hall signals in RuO2 appeared only in thicker relaxed films and required fields near 50 T, so the key advance is that strain lowers the field scale below 9 T. Density functional theory adds the mechanism: full epitaxial strain breaks a symmetry of the rutile lattice and stabilizes a non-compensated antiferromagnetic ground state with a net moment of $0.156\,\mu_B$ per cell, even without a Hubbard U. If correct, this makes strained RuO2 a practical epitaxial testbed for altermagnet-like transport and for ultrathin spintronic elements.

What carries the argument

The central object is the (110)-oriented epitaxial strain state of RuO2 on TiO2, with in-plane lattice constants locked to the substrate. In the calculations, strain $\varepsilon$ is interpolated from bulk RuO2 ($\varepsilon=0$) to full TiO2 lattice matching ($\varepsilon=1$); at $\varepsilon=1$ the stabilized magnetic ground state is a non-compensated antiferromagnet, described by the averaged Ru sublattice moment difference $|\mu_{RuA} - \mu_{RuB}|/2 = 0.366\,\mu_B$, with a net moment of $0.156\,\mu_B$ per cell. The load-bearing symmetry is $[C_2 \parallel C_{4t}]$, a two-fold spin rotation combined with a four-fold crystal rotation plus half-translation; breaking it under strain is what permits the non-compensated order. On the transport side, the analysis uses $\rho_H(H) = R_o H + \rho_{\rm AHE}\tanh(cH)$, where $R_o$ is the ordinary Hall coefficient and the tanh term represents a saturated anomalous Hall contribution; the Berry-curvature calculation of $\sigma_{\rm AHE}$ ties the transport signal to the magnetic orientation angle $\theta$.

What would settle it

Extend Hall measurements on the same 1.7 nm film to 50 T: if the nonlinear component keeps rising rather than following the saturating tanh form, or if a two-carrier fit accounts for the curvature without any magnetic term, the claimed anomalous Hall effect would be falsified. A complementary check is to measure the predicted strain-stabilized net moment of about $0.156\,\mu_B$ per cell by element-specific magnetometry on the fully strained sample.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that epitaxial strain, not chemical doping or an added Hubbard U, is what produces the magnetic order behind the anomalous Hall effect in RuO2 (110). In fully strained films between 0.8 and 3.9 nm thick, the authors observe metallicity down to the ultrathin limit and a saturated anomalous Hall resistivity near $0.3\,\mu\Omega\,{\rm cm}$ at temperatures below about 13 K, appearing at magnetic fields within $\pm 9$ T. First-principles calculations at $U=0$ show that at full strain the non-compensated antiferromagnetic state becomes the ground state, carrying a net moment of $0.156\,\mu_B$ per cell, because the (110) strain breaks the $[C_2 \parallel C_{4t}]$ symmetry and shifts narrow Ru $4d$ $t_{2g}$-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ states toward the Fermi level. The calculated anomalous Hall conductivity is negative, matching the measured sign, and grows as the spin orientation angle $\theta$ increases, which the authors use to explain the thickness dependence of the Hall signal.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes the measured Hall resistivity can be cleanly split into a linear ordinary part plus an anomalous part that has already saturated within the 9 T field range, so that the high-field slope near 9 T is purely the ordinary Hall effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fully strained RuO2 (110) films in the 0.8–3.9 nm range can be used as metallic magnets whose anomalous Hall effect appears below 9 T, removing the need for the roughly 50 T fields used in earlier RuO2 Hall experiments.
  • Epitaxial strain becomes a switch for magnetic order: the DFT phase sequence predicts non-compensated antiferromagnetism at full strain and ferromagnetism near $\varepsilon=0.9$, so choosing substrates or buffer layers should tune the ground state.
  • The anomalous Hall conductivity is expected to grow with spin reorientation angle $\theta$ and saturate near $\theta=90^\circ$, so manipulating the magnetic easy axis (in-plane [001]) or applying fields should control the sign and magnitude of the Hall response.
  • Because the magnetic anisotropy energy is about 1.1 meV per cell (roughly 13 K), the anomalous Hall effect should appear only at low temperatures even though the magnetic order itself may persist to much higher temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to measure the Hall nonlinearity under continuously varied biaxial stress on a single film rather than across different thicknesses, isolating strain's role from interface and dimensionality effects; the paper's strain-only DFT predicts the anomalous Hall signal should track $\varepsilon$ continuously.
  • If strain-stabilized non-compensated order is real in RuO2, other rutile or altermagnetic oxides grown on substrates with suitable lattice mismatch may show the same low-field anomalous Hall signature, making strain a general route to non-compensated magnetism.
  • The tanh saturation form implies a well-defined spin-reorientation angle at 9 T; a direct magnetization or Kerr measurement on the same films could verify that the anomalous Hall magnitude tracks $\theta$, which the paper currently infers from DFT.
  • The sharp drop in $\sigma_{\rm AHE}$ at 0.8 nm may indicate a percolation or interface limit rather than an intrinsic magnetic transition; this could be distinguished by growing the same thickness on substrates with different terrace widths and checking whether the drop shifts with step density.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports hybrid-MBE growth of fully strained ultrathin RuO2(110) films sandwiched between TiO2 layers, with detailed structural characterization (RHEED, XRR, XRD, RSM, ptychography, XPS/XAS) demonstrating high crystalline quality and atomically sharp interfaces. Electrical transport shows metallic behavior down to 0.8 nm thickness, with the 0.4 nm film insulating. For a 1.7 nm fully strained film, the Hall resistivity is nonlinear below ~15 K, and the authors attribute this to the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) by fitting ρ_H(H) = R0H + ρ_AHE tanh(cH), with R0 obtained from a linear fit near 9 T. DFT calculations predict that epitaxial strain stabilizes a non-compensated antiferromagnetic ground state with a net moment of 0.156 μB/cell, and the computed intrinsic σ_AHE is negative, matching the sign of the extracted experimental σ_AHE. The paper claims that ultrathin strained RuO2 exhibits a sizeable AHE below 9 T, unlike thicker relaxed films that require ~50 T.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper is significant: it identifies epitaxial strain as a control parameter for magnetic ordering in a candidate altermagnet, extends AHE observations to the ultrathin limit, and provides a first-principles rationale for a non-compensated magnetic ground state. The growth and structural work is convincing and the metallicity down to 0.8 nm is well supported by multiple complementary techniques. The DFT study is a valuable, independent prediction, and the fact that the sign of the computed σ_AHE matches experiment is encouraging. However, the transport evidence for AHE rests on a three-parameter fit to a smooth Hall curve whose model assumptions are not fully tested, and no direct magnetic measurement is presented. These issues need to be resolved before the AHE claim can be considered robust.

major comments (4)
  1. [p. 8–9, 'To quantitatively analyze...' and Fig. 2e] The decomposition ρ_H(H) = R0H + ρ_AHE tanh(cH) is introduced without justifying the tanh form or demonstrating that the anomalous term is saturated at 9 T. The ordinary coefficient R0 is obtained from a linear fit near 9 T, which assumes that no anomalous contribution remains at that field. No fitted values for c, R0, or ρ_AHE, nor residuals or uncertainties, are reported in the main text. This is load-bearing because if the assumed functional form is inappropriate or the anomalous contribution is not saturated at 9 T, the extracted ρ_AHE and the inferred magnetic origin of the nonlinearity are not established. Please report the fitted parameters and uncertainties, show the residuals, test the saturation assumption (e.g., by verifying that the high-field slope is field-independent over a range of fitting windows), and compare with alternative saturating functional forms to demonstrate that the AHE extraction is unique.
  2. [p. 8, 'Nonlinear Hall effects can arise...' and SI Note S1/Fig. S7] The main text rules out multi-carrier ordinary Hall conduction only by a statement that a multiple-conduction model fails, with the quantitative evidence deferred entirely to the supplementary information (Note S1, Fig. S7). This is a load-bearing step: the 9.1 nm partially relaxed film that shows a linear Hall effect does not control for the 1.7 nm fully strained film, because strain and quantum confinement change the Fermi-surface topology and can give rise to two-band or field-dependent carrier contributions that mimic a saturating AHE. Please present the multi-carrier fit results and their residuals in the main text, or at least provide a clear criterion for why the nonlinearity cannot be reproduced by ordinary multi-band transport.
  3. [p. 8–9, linear Hall control (Fig. 2d) vs. nonlinear Hall in t=1.7 nm] The linear Hall response of the t=9.1 nm partially relaxed film is used as a control, but it cannot rule out a multi-carrier origin of the nonlinearity in the 1.7 nm film because the electronic structure differs between fully strained ultrathin and partially relaxed thick films. The authors should explicitly address why a two-band or multiple-carrier scenario would not become relevant in the fully strained ultrathin limit, or provide a direct transport test (e.g., field-dependent Hall coefficient at several temperatures, or comparison with the DFT Fermi surface of the strained film). Without this, the assignment of the nonlinearity to AHE rather than to ordinary magnetotransport is not unique.
  4. [p. 9–10, DFT prediction and comparison with experiment (Fig. 3f)] The DFT calculation of the magnetic ground state and intrinsic σ_AHE is independent of the experimental transport data, which is a strength. However, the comparison in Fig. 3f is made with experimental σ_AHE values that were extracted using the model in the first major comment. Therefore the DFT results cannot independently validate the tanh/linear decomposition; at most they show that a non-compensated magnetic state with a negative σ_AHE is plausible under strain. The manuscript should clearly state this limitation and, ideally, provide a direct magnetic probe (SQUID, MOKE, XMCD, or μSR) of the films to support the claim that epitaxial strain stabilizes a non-compensated magnetic ground state. As written, the phrase 'decisive evidence' in the introduction is stronger than what the current data support.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and p. 5] The abstract and introduction state that films 'remain metallic down to the unit cell limit' and 'down to a thickness of 2 unit cell', but the thinnest metallic film is 0.8 nm (roughly 2–3 unit cells) while the 0.4 nm film is insulating. Please rephrase to avoid overstatement, e.g., 'down to ~0.8 nm (about two unit cells)'.
  2. [p. 9, Fig. 2e] The experimental Hall data in Fig. 2e are shown as markers and the fit as a solid line, but no error bars, residuals, or fit parameters are displayed. Adding these would allow readers to judge the quality of the fit and the reliability of the extracted ρ_AHE.
  3. [p. 11, 'matching the temperature for the onset of AHE in Fig. 2g'] This sentence appears to reference Fig. 2g, but Fig. 2g plots σ_AHE at 1.8 K versus thickness; the temperature-dependent onset is shown in Fig. 2f. Please correct the figure reference.
  4. [p. 7, XRR thickness determination] The XRR fitting is described as determining each layer thickness precisely, but no uncertainties are given for the fitted thicknesses. Reporting these would support the claimed agreement with ptychography (2.0 nm vs. 2.1 nm).
  5. [p. 11, MAE and AHE onset] The statement that 'AHE only appears below temperatures set by the MAE (~13 K)' is based on data at T ≤ 15 K; the onset temperature is not resolved with fine temperature steps. Please clarify whether the onset was determined from temperature sweeps or from the presence of nonlinearity at selected temperatures, and consider adding a finer temperature dependence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: transport extraction and DFT are independent; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central experimental claim rests on fitting ρH(H) = RoH + ρAHE tanh(cH) and removing the ordinary Hall effect by a high-field linear fit. This is a data-reduction model with an assumed functional form, not a circular derivation: the extracted ρAHE is a measured quantity, and the DFT calculation of the magnetic ground state and σAHE is performed from first principles (PBE, Wannier interpolation, Berry curvature) without feeding in any experimental ρAHE value. The computed negative σAHE is compared with, not derived from, the measured σAHE. The attribution of the nonlinear Hall signal to AHE rather than multi-carrier conduction is supported by DFT and by the SI multi-carrier analysis; even if that attribution is debatable, it is an inference with independent evidence rather than a tautology. Several citations to the authors' prior work appear (e.g., refs 13, 20, 25, 54), but none is load-bearing: ref 13 is used for the [C2 || C4t] symmetry classification while the non-compensated magnetic order is directly computed in the present DFT, and refs 20/21/25/54 are growth or comparison benchmarks. The SI-only multi-carrier dismissal is a robustness/completeness concern, not a circularity, because the main-text DFT provides independent evidence. No prediction reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central interpretation rests on a small number of modeling choices: the tanh form for the AHE field dependence, removal of the ordinary Hall term by a high-field linear fit, PBE-GGA DFT at U=0 for the magnetic ground state, and assignment of the nonlinear Hall signal to intrinsic magnetic order rather than multi-carrier effects. These are reasonable choices, but they are not all independently verified in the main text.

free parameters (2)
  • c (AHE field-dependence parameter in tanh fit) = not stated in main text
    Fitted to the Hall resistivity data of each sample; the reported ρAHE and its separation from the ordinary Hall term depend on this choice.
  • Ro (ordinary Hall coefficient) = not stated in main text
    Obtained from linear fitting of ρH near 9 T; assumed to isolate the ordinary Hall contribution from the AHE.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The field dependence of the anomalous Hall contribution is described by tanh(cH) and saturates within the ±9 T range.
    Used in the equation for ρH(H) on page 8; this functional form is assumed, not derived from a microscopic model.
  • domain assumption The component of ρH linear in H near 9 T is entirely ordinary Hall effect.
    The paper subtracts the ordinary Hall effect by linear fitting at high field (page 9); this assumes no AHE curvature remains there.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT without Hubbard U reliably predicts the magnetic ground state of strained RuO2.
    DFT at U=0 is used to claim a strain-stabilized non-compensated AFM state; the contested nature of RuO2 magnetism makes this nontrivial.
  • domain assumption The AHE signal originates from intrinsic magnetic order in the RuO2 layer, not from TiO2 layers or interfaces.
    Supported by a t=0 nm control and by oxygen-annealing tests in the SI, but no direct magnetic characterization is provided.
  • domain assumption Epitaxial strain in the calculations is modeled by imposing TiO2 in-plane lattice constants and relaxing out-of-plane.
    Standard practice for strained films, but interface octahedral distortions in ultrathin RuO2 may go beyond this simple model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metallicity and Anomalous Hall Effect in Epitaxially-Strained, Atomically-thin RuO2 Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5JAR3XJX

@misc{pith2026250111204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metallicity and Anomalous Hall Effect in Epitaxially-Strained, Atomically-thin RuO2 Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5JAR3XJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11204}
}
read the original abstract

The anomalous Hall effect (AHE), a hallmark of time-reversal symmetry breaking, has been reported in rutile RuO2, a debated metallic altermagnetic candidate. Previously, AHE in RuO2 was observed only in strain-relaxed thick films under extremely high magnetic fields (~50 T). Yet, in ultrathin strained films with distinctive anisotropic electronic structures, there are no reports, likely due to disorder and defects suppressing metallicity thus hindering its detection. Here, we demonstrate that ultrathin, fully-strained 2 nm TiO2/t nm RuO2/TiO2 (110) heterostructures, grown by hybrid molecular beam epitaxy, retain metallicity and exhibit a sizeable AHE at a significantly lower magnetic field (< 9 T). Density functional theory calculations reveal that epitaxial strain stabilizes a non-compensated magnetic ground state and reconfigures magnetic ordering in RuO2 (110) thin films. These findings establish ultrathin RuO2 as a platform for strain-engineered magnetism and underscore the transformative potential of epitaxial design in advancing spintronic technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin-Splitting Magnetoresistance in Altermagnetic RuO2 Thin Films

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A phase-shifted magnetoresistance in (101)-RuO2/Co bilayers is attributed to spin-splitting magnetoresistance, indicating altermagnetism with a Néel vector near [001] in epitaxial RuO2 thin films.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1 Metallicity and Anomalous Hall Effect in Epitaxially-Strained, Atomically-thin RuO2 Films Seung Gyo Jeong1,☨,*, Seungjun Lee2,☨,*, Bonnie Lin3, Zhifei Yang1, 2, In Hyeok Choi5, Jin Young Oh6, Sehwan Song7, Seung wook Lee5, Sreejith Nair1, Rashmi Choudhary1, Juhi Parikh1, Sungkyun Park7, Woo Seok Choi6, Jong Seok Lee5, James M. LeBeau3, Tony Low2,*, and ...

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Z. H. Zhu et al., Anomalous Antiferromagnetism in Metallic RuO2 Determined by Resonant X-ray Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Berlijn et al., Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in RuO2

    T. Berlijn et al., Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Keßler et al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from μSR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction

    P. Keßler et al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from μSR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction. npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Hiraishi et al., Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation

    M. Hiraishi et al., Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Z. X. Feng et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide. Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Fedchenko et al., Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2

    O. Fedchenko et al., Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2. Sci. Adv. 10 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Karube et al., Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2

    S. Karube et al., Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Bai et al., Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2

    H. Bai et al., Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    G u o et al., Direct and Inverse Spin Splitting Effects in Altermagnetic RuO2

    Y. G u o et al., Direct and Inverse Spin Splitting Effects in Altermagnetic RuO2. Adv. Sci., 2400967 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Bai et al., Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO2

    H. Bai et al., Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Zhou et al., Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO2

    X. Zhou et al., Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Tschirner et al., Saturation of the anomalous Hall effect at high magnetic fields in altermagnetic RuO2

    T. Tschirner et al., Saturation of the anomalous Hall effect at high magnetic fields in altermagnetic RuO2. APL Mater. 11, 101103 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Song et al., Spin-Orbit Coupling Driven Magnetic Response in Altermagnetic RuO2

    J. Song et al., Spin-Orbit Coupling Driven Magnetic Response in Altermagnetic RuO2. Small n/a, 2407722 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    arXiv.2405.05838 (2024)

    Seung Gyo Jeong et al., Altermagnetic Polar Metallic phase in Ultra-Thin Epitaxially-Strained RuO2 Films. arXiv.2405.05838 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Wang et al., Emergent zero-field anomalous Hall effect in a reconstructed rutile antiferromagnetic metal

    M. Wang et al., Emergent zero-field anomalous Hall effect in a reconstructed rutile antiferromagnetic metal. Nat. Commun. 14, 8240 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Weber et al., All optical excitation of spin polarization in d-wave altermagnets

    M. Weber et al., All optical excitation of spin polarization in d-wave altermagnets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05187 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    R. M. Fernandes, V . S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets. Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Bhowal, N

    S. Bhowal, N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically Ordered Magnetic Octupoles in d-Wave Altermagnets. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Nair et al., Engineering metal oxidation using epitaxial strain

    S. Nair et al., Engineering metal oxidation using epitaxial strain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1005-1011 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    B. Z. Gregory et al., Strain-induced orbital-energy shift in antiferromagnetic RuO2 revealed by resonant elastic x-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. B 106, 195135 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    J. P. Ruf et al., Strain-stabilized superconductivity. Nat. Commun. 12, 59 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Nunn et al., Solid-source metal–organic molecular beam epitaxy of epitaxial RuO2

    W. Nunn et al., Solid-source metal–organic molecular beam epitaxy of epitaxial RuO2. APL Mater. 9 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    A. K. Rajapitamahuni et al., Thickness-dependent insulator-to-metal transition in epitaxial RuO2 films. Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 075002 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Chen et al., Electron ptychography achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations

    Z. Chen et al., Electron ptychography achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations. Science 372, 826-831 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Cheong, F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong, F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins. npj Quantum Mater. 9, 13 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    S. G. Jeong et al., Dimensionality Engineering of Magnetic Anisotropy from the Anomalous Hall Effect in Synthetic SrRuO3 Crystals. Nano Lett. 24, 7979-7986 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    M. W. Tate et al., High Dynamic Range Pixel Array Detector for Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis 22, 237-249 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Smolyanyuk, I

    A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, R. Valentí, Fragility of the magnetic order in 19 the prototypical altermagnet RuO2. Phys. Rev. B 109, 134424 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    K. Wakonig et al., PtychoShelves, a versatile high-level framework for high-performance analysis of ptychographic dataThis article will form part of a virtual special issue of the journal on ptychography software and technical developments. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 53, 574-586 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    J. M. LeBeau, S. D. Findlay, L. J. Allen, S. Stemmer, Position averaged convergent beam electron diffraction: Theory and applications. Ultramicroscopy 110, 118-125 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Thibault, A

    P. Thibault, A. Menzel, Reconstructing state mixtures from diffraction measurements. Nature 494, 68-71 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Thibault, M

    P. Thibault, M. Guizar-Sicairos, Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging. New Journal of Physics 14, 063004 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Physical Review 140, A1133-A1138 (1965)

    1965

  27. [35]

    E. H. R. Tsai, I. Usov, A. Diaz, A. Menzel, M. Guizar-Sicairos, X-ray ptychography with extended depth of field. Opt. Express 24, 29089-29108 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953-17979 (1994)

    1994

  29. [37]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169-11186 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868 (1996)

    1996

  31. [39]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758-1775 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications

    G. Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    A. A. Mostofi et al., An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309-2310 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Okuma, Y

    H. Okuma, Y . Katayama, K. Otomo, K. Ueno, Transport properties around the metal-insulator transition for SrVO3 ultrathin films fabricated by electrochemical etching. Phys. Rev. B 105, 045138 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    K. S. Takahashi, Y . Tokura, M. Kawasaki, Metal–insulator transitions in dimensionality controlled LaxSr1−xVO3 films. APL Mater. 10, 111114 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Wang et al., Metal-insulator transition of SrVO3 ultrathin films embedded in SrVO3/SrTiO3 superlattices

    J. Wang et al., Metal-insulator transition of SrVO3 ultrathin films embedded in SrVO3/SrTiO3 superlattices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 133105 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Fouchet et al., Study of the electronic phase transition with low dimensionality in SrVO3 thin films

    A. Fouchet et al., Study of the electronic phase transition with low dimensionality in SrVO3 thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 212, 7-13 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Kim et al., Capping and gate control of anomalous Hall effect and hump structure in ultra-thin SrRuO3 films

    D. Kim et al., Capping and gate control of anomalous Hall effect and hump structure in ultra-thin SrRuO3 films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 173102 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Y. J . C h a n g et al., Fundamental Thickness Limit of Itinerant Ferromagnetic SrRuO3 Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 057201 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    P. D. C. King et al., Atomic-scale control of competing electronic phases in ultrathin LaNiO3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 443-447 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Golalikhani et al., Nature of the metal-insulator transition in few-unit-cell-thick LaNiO3 films

    M. Golalikhani et al., Nature of the metal-insulator transition in few-unit-cell-thick LaNiO3 films. Nat. Commun. 9, 2206 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Kimura et al., Large phonon drag thermopower boosted by massive electrons and phonon leaking in LaAlO3/LaNiO3/LaAlO3 heterostructure

    M. Kimura et al., Large phonon drag thermopower boosted by massive electrons and phonon leaking in LaAlO3/LaNiO3/LaAlO3 heterostructure. Nano Lett. 21, 9240-9246 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Gallego et al., Reversible metal-insulator transition in SrIrO3 ultrathin layers by field effect control of inversion symmetry breaking

    F. Gallego et al., Reversible metal-insulator transition in SrIrO3 ultrathin layers by field effect control of inversion symmetry breaking. Commun. Mater. 4, 36 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Liao et al., Origin of the metal-insulator transition in ultrathin films of La2/3Sr1/3MnO3

    Z. Liao et al., Origin of the metal-insulator transition in ultrathin films of La2/3Sr1/3MnO3. Phys. Rev. B 92, 125123 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Scherwitzl, P

    R. Scherwitzl, P. Zubko, C. Lichtensteiger, J. M. Triscone, Electric-field tuning of the metal-insulator transition in ultrathin films of LaNiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 222114 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    S. Nair, Z. Yang, K. Storr, B. Jalan, High-Mobility Carriers in Epitaxial IrO2 Films Grown using Hybrid Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Nano Lett. 24, 10850-10857 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    J. K. Kawasaki et al., Engineering Carrier Effective Masses in Ultrathin Quantum Wells of IrO2. 20 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 176802 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    J. W. Tashman et al., Epitaxial growth of VO2 by periodic annealing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 063104 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Song et al., Surface reconstructions and electronic structure of metallic delafossite thin films

    Q. Song et al., Surface reconstructions and electronic structure of metallic delafossite thin films. APL Mater. 12, 081117 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Formica et al., Ultrastable and Atomically Smooth Ultrathin Silver Films Grown on a Copper Seed Layer

    N. Formica et al., Ultrastable and Atomically Smooth Ultrathin Silver Films Grown on a Copper Seed Layer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 5, 3048-3053 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Harada, K

    T. Harada, K. Fujiwara, A. Tsukazaki, Highly conductive PdCoO2 ultrathin films for transparent electrodes. APL Mater. 6, 046107 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Siniscalchi, D

    M. Siniscalchi, D. Tierno, K. Moors, Z. Tőkei, C. Adelmann, Temperature-dependent resistivity of alternative metal thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 043104 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    L. G. Wen et al., Atomic Layer Deposition of Ruthenium with TiN Interface for Sub-10 nm Advanced Interconnects beyond Copper. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8, 26119-26125 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Schaub et al., Gold nanolayer and nanocluster coatings induced by heat treatment and evaporation technique

    A. Schaub et al., Gold nanolayer and nanocluster coatings induced by heat treatment and evaporation technique. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 249 (2013)

    2013

  55. [63]

    F o u n t a et al., Properties of ultrathin molybdenum films for interconnect applications

    V. F o u n t a et al., Properties of ultrathin molybdenum films for interconnect applications. Materialia 24, 101511 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    J. W. Suk et al., Transfer of CVD-Grown Monolayer Graphene onto Arbitrary Substrates. ACS Nano 5, 6916-6924 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    Wang et al., Tuning magnetotransport in a compensated semimetal at the atomic scale

    L. Wang et al., Tuning magnetotransport in a compensated semimetal at the atomic scale. Nat. Commun. 6, 8892 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Ma et al., Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Single Crystalline CoTe2 Nanosheets with Tunable Thickness and Electronic Properties

    H. Ma et al., Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Single Crystalline CoTe2 Nanosheets with Tunable Thickness and Electronic Properties. Chemistry of Materials 30, 8891-8896 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Ma et al., Controlled Synthesis of Ultrathin PtSe2 Nanosheets with Thickness-Tunable Electrical and Magnetoelectrical Properties

    H. Ma et al., Controlled Synthesis of Ultrathin PtSe2 Nanosheets with Thickness-Tunable Electrical and Magnetoelectrical Properties. Adv. Sci. 9, 2103507 (2022)

    2022

  60. [69]

    Ma et al., Thickness-Tunable Synthesis of Ultrathin Type-II Dirac Semimetal PtTe2 Single Crystals and Their Thickness-Dependent Electronic Properties

    H. Ma et al., Thickness-Tunable Synthesis of Ultrathin Type-II Dirac Semimetal PtTe2 Single Crystals and Their Thickness-Dependent Electronic Properties. Nano Lett. 18, 3523-3529 (2018). 21 Figures Figure 1: Realization of metallicity in ultrathin RuO2 (110) heterostructures u...

    2018

  61. [200]

    Department of Energy through grant numbers DE-SC0020211, and DE-SC0024710

    Acknowledgements Film synthesis and structural characterization (S.G.J and B.J.) was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy through grant numbers DE-SC0020211, and DE-SC0024710. Electrical 17 transport and XPS (at UMN) were supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific R...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.