REVIEW 2 cited by
Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, but often at the cost of reduced output diversity. This trade-off between diversity and alignment quality remains a significant challenge. Drawing inspiration from curiosity-driven exploration in reinforcement learning, we introduce curiosity-driven RLHF (CD-RLHF), a framework that incorporates intrinsic rewards for novel states, alongside traditional sparse extrinsic rewards, to optimize both output diversity and alignment quality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CD-RLHF through extensive experiments on a range of tasks, including text summarization and instruction following. Our approach achieves significant gains in diversity on multiple diversity-oriented metrics while maintaining alignment with human preferences comparable to standard RLHF. We make our code publicly available at https://github.com/ernie-research/CD-RLHF.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Avoidance Decoding for Diverse Multi-Branch Story Generation
Avoidance Decoding penalizes token choices that resemble previously generated story branches, using a hybrid concept-level and narrative-level similarity penalty, and reports large diversity gains across several LLMs.
-
Quality-constrained Entropy Maximization Policy Optimization for LLM Diversity
Quality-constrained entropy maximization yields simple DPO-like objectives that increase LLM output diversity while preserving or slightly improving quality, with theoretical guarantees under tuned temperature conditions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.