Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

A White Dwarf Binary Candidate Discovered by LAMOST Using Dynamical Method

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The unseen companion in J2308 is a white dwarf, the authors argue, using radial velocities and light-curve fits to pin its mass below 0.8 solar masses.

desk verdict A solid single-object RV+SED characterization, but the white dwarf conclusion leans on a PHOEBE inclination that the authors themselves admit does not fit the data; the candidate status is right, the conclusion overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11865 v1 pith:ICA4IBDG submitted 2025-01-21 astro-ph.SR

Haifan Zhu , Wei Wang , Xue Lib , Jia-jia Li , Pengfu Tian This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords whitedwarfbinaryradialvelocityLAMOSTmassfunctionTESSlightcurveellipsoidalmodulationKstars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that LAMOST J230854.08+355132.4 is a non-interacting binary consisting of a K-type dwarf and an unseen white dwarf, with an orbital period of about 0.953 days. The claim rests on a radial-velocity mass function of 0.129 solar masses, an SED-derived visible-star mass of 0.68 solar masses, and an inclination preference above 60 degrees from fitting the 2019 TESS light curve. If correct, the system is a rare, directly discovered white-dwarf binary where the compact object was found dynamically rather than through accretion or pulsations. The authors also use the Roche lobe radius and thin-disk kinematics to argue that no mass transfer is occurring and that the companion is not a neutron star.

What carries the argument

The central identity is the binary mass function f(M2) = (M2 $sin^{3}$ i)/(1+q)^2 = P $K^{3}$ (1-$e^{2}$)^{3/2}/(2πG), which ties the unseen companion's mass to the system's inclination. The paper drives this relation with a SED-derived visible star mass (0.68 Msun) from astroARIADNE and MIST, and a PHOEBE light-curve fit to the 2019 TESS data to push the inclination above 60 degrees. The Roche lobe radius from Eggleton's approximation then shows that the visible star is detached, which rules out mass transfer and leads to weak ellipsoidal modulation. The kinematic integration with galpy provides a thin-disk orbit that the authors take as evidence against a natal-kick neutron star.

What would settle it

If future Gaia astrometry yields an astrometric orbit with an inclination below about 35 degrees and a companion mass above 1.4 solar masses, the white-dwarf classification is ruled out. Alternatively, a direct detection of a hot white-dwarf photosphere in the ultraviolet would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the invisible star in J2308 is a white dwarf. The radial velocity curve gives P=0.953 d and f(M2)=0.129 Msun; SED fitting gives the visible K dwarf a mass of 0.68 Msun. Combining these in the mass function shows the unseen companion stays below the Chandrasekhar limit for inclinations above about 35 degrees, and the PHOEBE fits to the 2019 TESS ellipsoidal modulation favor inclinations above 60 degrees, which places the companion below roughly 0.8 Msun. The Roche lobe is larger than the visible star, so the system is detached, and the Galactic orbit is consistent with a thin-disk population. Therefore the authors conclude that the hidden companion is a white dwarf rather than a neutron star or a more massive compact object.

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on the light-curve fits preferring an inclination above 60 degrees even though the paper acknowledges those fits do not reproduce the observed 2019 TESS light curve, so if the true inclination is lower, the unseen companion could be more massive than the Chandrasekhar limit and not a white dwarf.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If confirmed, J2308 joins a short list of non-interacting white-dwarf binaries discovered dynamically from LAMOST spectra.
  • The system is detached, so it offers a clean laboratory for white-dwarf mass constraints without accretion contamination.
  • The preference for high inclination from imperfect light-curve fits implies that a better spot model could refine the companion mass to a narrower range than 0.8 solar masses.
  • The consistency with a thin-disk orbit argues against a neutron-star natal kick, supporting the white-dwarf interpretation.
  • The 0.953-day period places J2308 among the shortest-period non-interacting K-dwarf plus white-dwarf binaries known.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test is to search for the white dwarf's ultraviolet flux with GALEX or future UV surveys; a hot WD photosphere would directly confirm the companion's nature, though a non-detection would not rule it out if the WD is old and cool.
  • The ASAS-SN classification as a rotational variable suggests that some 'rotational variables' in time-domain catalogs could hide similar compact companions, and a systematic RV mass-function cut on LAMOST MRS stars with large radial-velocity variations may reveal more such systems.
  • If spot-induced variability dominates the photometric modulation, multi-epoch TESS observations could map spot evolution and break the inclination degeneracy that currently limits the companion mass estimate.
  • The argument that systems with large RV variations are preferentially high-inclination could be quantified by comparing the observed K distribution of the LAMOST sample with simulated binary populations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and characterization of LAMOST J230854.08+355132.4, a single-lined spectroscopic binary with an orbital period of about 0.953 days and a radial-velocity mass function of 0.129 Msun. The visible star is a K-dwarf with Teff ~4160 K, radius ~0.67 Rsun, and isochrone mass ~0.68 Msun, obtained from SED fitting with astroARIADNE and MIST isochrones. The mass function plus the visible star mass yields a mass-inclination relation for the unseen companion, and the Roche lobe radius is larger than the visible star's radius, implying no ongoing mass transfer. TESS, ASAS-SN, and CRTS light curves show ~0.95 day periodic variability, with ellipsoidal modulation claimed only in one 2019 TESS epoch; strong H-alpha emission is interpreted as chromospheric activity from the K-dwarf. PHOEBE light-curve fits in Section 4.3 are used to argue for an inclination greater than 60 degrees, leading to the conclusion that the unseen companion is a white dwarf with mass below 0.8 Msun. The abstract more cautiously calls the object a 'white dwarf candidate'.

Significance. If the white-dwarf classification is secure, J2308 would be a useful addition to the small sample of non-interacting K-dwarf plus white-dwarf binaries with short orbital periods, and the paper demonstrates a practical LAMOST search strategy based on the mass function. The RV analysis is well executed and the fitted Keplerian parameters are consistent with the independent prior measurement of Liu et al. (2024); the SED fitting procedure is standard and yields precise stellar parameters; the conclusion that the visible star does not fill its Roche lobe is straightforward from the adopted masses and period. The paper also makes appropriate use of archival TESS, ASAS-SN, and CRTS photometry and identifies the role of stellar spots in masking weak ellipsoidal modulation. However, the central classification claim rests on an inclination constraint obtained from PHOEBE models that, by the authors' own admission, do not reproduce the observed 2019 TESS light curve; this weakens the paper's strongest conclusion and makes the current support for 'white dwarf' considerably weaker than the support for 'unseen compact-object candidate'.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.3, Figures 8 and 9, and Section 5] The conclusion in Section 5 that 'we can conclude that the invisible star in this system is a white dwarf' is not supported by the evidence presented. Section 4.3 states that the spotless PHOEBE model fails to accurately capture the observed light curve and that the single-spot model does not adequately describe the second peak. A model that does not fit the data cannot provide a reliable posterior constraint on the inclination. This is not a minor caveat: the inclination is the only quantity separating a white-dwarf companion from a neutron-star companion, since Eq. (1) gives M2 = f(1+q)^2/sin^3 i, and an inclination near 30 degrees would imply M2 > ~1.8 Msun. The posterior degeneracy is visible in Figure 8, where q@binary is essentially unconstrained; the ellipsoidal signal therefore carries almost no joint information on q and i. The authors should either obtain an independent geometric inclination constraint, or explicitly present the white-dwarf identification as a candidate classification contingent on the assumed isotropic-inclination prior, not as a demonstrated conclusion.
  2. [Section 4.3, PHOEBE model setup] The PHOEBE models fix the unseen companion to be dark and compact (R2 = 3e-6 Rsun, Teff2 = 300 K). This is a reasonable modeling choice for a putative compact object, but it means the light-curve fit cannot independently validate that the companion is compact. The inclination posterior derived from such a model should be reported together with a clear statement that it assumes the companion is dark and small; the current text moves from this assumption to a mass estimate and then uses that mass estimate to support the white-dwarf classification. The logic would be less circular if the companion's luminosity or radius were allowed to vary and the resulting constraints on the dark-companion hypothesis were assessed.
  3. [Section 4.3, kinematic analysis] The thin-disk orbital kinematics do not robustly exclude a neutron-star companion. The paper argues that neutron stars receive natal kicks of 100-500 km/s and hence would produce atypical Galactic orbits, but the cited reference [55] itself cautions that the current space velocities of older neutron stars provide little direct information about their birth kicks. The integration over 250 Myr with a single Galactic potential is also far too simple to support a strong population-level exclusion. At minimum, the authors should quantify the fraction of neutron-star binaries that would be consistent with the observed orbit, or explicitly weaken the kinematic argument to 'consistent with a thin-disk population, as expected for a white-dwarf companion'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] The text says 'identifying sources with a false alarm probability greater than 0.005'; this should presumably be 'less than 0.005' for a periodicity selection threshold.
  2. [Section 3.2] The sentence 'the radius of the visible star, approximately R⊙ as obtained from the SED fitting' appears garbled; it should read 'approximately 0.67 Rsun' or similar.
  3. [Section 4.1] There is a typographical artifact '=In addition' in the final paragraph of Section 4.1; this should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3.3] The phrase 'the periods of the light curves were 0.9453 days and 0.9530 days, respectively' is grammatically awkward; the plural 'periods' refers to the two TESS epochs but the sentence structure is confusing.
  5. [Figures 8 and 9] The corner plots do not include convergence diagnostics or the prior ranges used for the PHOEBE parameters; reporting these would help readers interpret the unconstrained q posteriors and the very broad inclination posteriors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the RV mass function, SED stellar mass, and Eq. (1) mass-inclination algebra are independent; the PHOEBE inclination is a fitted input, and the paper itself flags the light-curve fits as imperfect.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs. The Joker RV fit (Sec. 3.1) gives P = 0.953307 d, K = 109.611 km/s, and f(M2) = 0.129 Msun through Eq. (1); this is an independent measurement. The SED fit (Sec. 3.2, Table 2) independently gives M1 = 0.68 Msun for the visible star. Combining these via Eq. (1) yields M2(i); the statement that M2 is below the Chandrasekhar limit for i > 35 degrees is a direct algebraic rearrangement, not a fitted prediction, and the 0.82 probability is an explicitly stated isotropic cos i prior. In Sec. 4.3 the PHOEBE fit models the 2019 TESS light curve with a dark companion (R2 = 3e-6 Rsun, Teff2 = 300 K) and outputs an inclination preference i > 60 degrees; that inclination is a fitted parameter, not an input, and M2 < 0.8 Msun follows from Eq. (1) rather than from the light-curve model itself. The paper openly acknowledges that the spotless model 'fails to accurately capture the observed light curve' and that the single-spot model 'does not adequately describe the second peak,' which is a model-fidelity and statistical-validity caveat rather than a circular reduction: the mass function is not fitted to those light curves, and the inclination is not defined in terms of the white-dwarf conclusion. The thin-disk kinematic argument is a separate supporting check, not the basis for the mass estimate. The only self-citations are minor and non-load-bearing: [30] is used only to exclude previously studied sources, and [59] supports a standard thin-disk criterion; neither imports the paper's conclusion. No equation or parameter is defined in terms of the target result, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Keplerian mass function, the Eggleton Roche lobe formula, and several modeling assumptions: that the unseen companion is dark and small, that the visible star's SED/isochrone mass is accurate, that inclinations follow an isotropic prior, and that H-alpha emission is chromospheric rather than accreting. No free parameters beyond those fitted to the RV and light-curve data are used; no new physical entities are introduced beyond standard surface spots.

free parameters (6)
  • Visible star isochrone mass M1 = 0.68 Msun (0.66-0.71)
    Interpolated from MIST isochrones using the SED-fitted Teff, log g, and [Fe/H]; enters the mass function inversion and Roche lobe calculation.
  • RV semi-amplitude K = 109.6 km/s
    Fitted with The Joker to LAMOST MRS RVs; sets the mass function f(M)=0.129 Msun.
  • Orbital period P = 0.953307 d
    Fitted with The Joker; consistent with the prior value of 0.95 d in [32].
  • Eccentricity e = 0.009
    Fitted with The Joker; near circular.
  • Orbital inclination i = posterior medians 65.7 deg (spotless) and 92.3 deg (single-spot); >60 deg used
    Not directly measured; inferred from the 2019 TESS light curve via PHOEBE with spot models that do not fully fit the data; critical for converting the mass function into a companion mass.
  • Spot parameters (relative temperature, radius, longitude, latitude) = e.g., relteff 1.013, radius 17 deg, longitude 167 deg (single-spot model)
    Fitted PHOEBE single-spot model parameters; used to model the spotted light curve.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Keplerian mass function relation f(M) = M2 sin^3 i / (1+q)^2 = P K^3 (1-e^2)^(3/2) / (2 pi G)
    Invoked in Eq. 1 to convert RV parameters into the mass function.
  • standard math Eggleton Roche lobe approximation RRL = 0.49 q^(2/3) a / (0.6 q^(2/3) + ln(1+q^(1/3)))
    Invoked in Eq. 2 to compute the Roche lobe radius and conclude no mass transfer.
  • ad hoc to paper The unseen companion is dark and small (R2 = 3e-6 Rsun, Teff2 = 300 K) in the PHOEBE model
    Adopted in Section 4.3 from refs [22,51]; presumes the companion is a compact object, which is the hypothesis under test; biases the light-curve interpretation.
  • domain assumption Orbital inclinations are uniformly distributed in cos i
    Used in Section 3.2 to state an 82% probability that the unseen mass is below the Chandrasekhar limit; a prior, not a measurement.
  • domain assumption The visible star's SED and isochrone parameters are accurate and the companion contributes negligible flux
    Used in Section 3.2; if the companion were a main-sequence star, the SED and light-curve fits would differ, and the mass function alone would not distinguish a WD from a low-mass star.
  • domain assumption H-alpha emission originates from chromospheric activity rather than accretion
    Invoked in Section 4.2 to argue the system is non-interacting; supported by the Roche lobe argument, but not directly proven.
invented entities (1)
  • Surface hot spots on the K-dwarf visible star independent evidence
    purpose: Explain the rotational-like light-curve variability, the single-peaked H-alpha emission, and the absence of ellipsoidal modulation in most epochs.
    Starspots are an established stellar phenomenon; the paper uses phase-dependent H-alpha behavior, ASAS-SN classification as a rotational variable, and multi-epoch TESS/CRTS light curves as evidence, but does not provide a direct spot imaging constraint.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A White Dwarf Binary Candidate Discovered by LAMOST Using Dynamical Method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ICA4IBDG

@misc{pith2026250111865,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A White Dwarf Binary Candidate Discovered by LAMOST Using Dynamical Method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ICA4IBDG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11865}
}
abstract

We present the discovery of a binary system containing a white dwarf candidate using data from the LAMOST. Our analysis of the radial velocity data allowed us to determine an orbital period of approximately 0.953 days and a mass function of 0.129 $M_\odot$. Through spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, we obtained the stellar parameters of the visible star. By combining these results with the mass function, we established a relationship between the mass of the invisible star and the system's inclination angle, along with the Roche lobe radius. We find that the mass of the invisible star is below the Chandrasekhar limit when the inclination angle exceeds $35^\circ$. Given that systems with large variations in radial velocity typically have high inclination angles, we classify the invisible star as a white dwarf candidate. The Roche lobe radius exceeds the physical radius of the visible star, indicating that no mass transfer occurs, which results in a weak ellipsoidal modulation effect. Additionally, we obtained light curves from the TESS, ASAS-SN, and CRTS surveys. The light curves also exhibit a periodicity of approximately 0.95 days, with ellipsoidal modulation only in the 2019 TESS observations. Coupled with the strong $\rm H_{\alpha}$ emission line observed in the LAMOST MRS spectrum, we infer that the surface of the visible star contains significant hot spots. This obscures the system's inherently weak ellipsoidal modulation, resulting in a manifestation of rotational variables. Furthermore, an analysis of the dynamical characteristics of this system indicates that it has a high inclination angle ($>60$ degrees) and its orbital properties are consistent with those of typical thin disk stars, supporting the hypothesis that the invisible object is a white dwarf.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11865 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top panel: The corner plot illustrates the distribution of or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SED fitting of J2308. The photometric data used for fitting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panel: the relationship between the mass of the invis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: the phase-folded TESS light curve. The top panel shows the 2019 observation data, while the bottom panel presents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panel: top panel is the phase-folded light curve using ASAS-SN data. Bottom panel is the phase-folded light curve using CRTS data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The fitting results using PyHammer. The black curve rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: the phase-dependent Hα emission from J2308 in the LAM￾OST MRS spectra. The position marked by the red line corresponds to a wavelength of 6562.8 Å. tion, and other parameters that are consistent with those previously reported. We performed SED fitting using photometric…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: Fitting results and residuals using the spot-free [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The top panel shows the variation of the source’s position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [55]

    Deceleration of kicked objects due to the Galactic potential

    P. Disberg, N. Gaspari, A. J. Levan, Deceleration of kicked objects due to the galactic potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06436 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Mullally, C

    F. Mullally, C. Badenes, S. E. Thompson, R. Lupton, Twins: The two shortest period non-interacting double degenerate white dwarf stars, The Astrophysical Journal 707 (1) (2009) L51

    work page 2009

  3. [2]

    Casewell, I

    S. Casewell, I. Braker, S. Parsons, J. Hermes, M. Burleigh, C. Belardi, A. Chaushev, N. Finch, M. Roy, S. Littlefair, et al., The first sub-70 min non-interacting wd–bd system: Epic212235321, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (1) (2018) 1405–1411

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Jayasinghe, D

    T. Jayasinghe, D. Rowan, T. A. Thompson, C. Kochanek, K. Stanek, A search for compact object companions to high mass function single-lined spectroscopic binaries in gaia dr3, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 521 (4) (2023) 5927–5939

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Duch ˆene, A

    G. Duch ˆene, A. Kraus, Stellar multiplicity, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 51 (1) (2013) 269–310

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    A. P. Whitworth, O. Lomax, Are the majority of sun-like stars single?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448 (2) (2015) 1761–1766

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    R. A. Remillard, J. E. McClintock, X-Ray Properties of Black- Hole Binaries, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 44 (1) (2006) 49–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44. 051905.092532

    arXiv 2006

  8. [7]

    Rebassa-Mansergas, A

    A. Rebassa-Mansergas, A. Nebot G ´omez-Mor´an, M. R. Schreiber, B. G ¨ansicke, A. Schwope, J. Gallardo, D. Koester, Post-common envelope binaries from sdss–xiv. the dr7 white dwarf–main-sequence binary catalogue, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 419 (1) (2012) 806–816

    work page 2012

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    X. Chen, Z. Liu, Z. Han, Binary stars in the new millennium, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics (2023) 104083

    2023

  2. [9]

    Cui, Y .-H

    X.-Q. Cui, Y .-H. Zhao, Y .-Q. Chu, G.-P. Li, Q. Li, L.-P. Zhang, H.-J. Su, Z.-Q. Yao, Y .-N. Wang, X.-Z. Xing, et al., The large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope (lamost), Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics 12 (9) (2012) 1197

    2012

  3. [10]

    Zhao, Y .-H

    G. Zhao, Y .-H. Zhao, Y .-Q. Chu, Y .-P. Jing, L.-C. Deng, Lam- ost spectral survey—an overview, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 12 (7) (2012) 723

    2012

  4. [11]

    Gu, H.-J

    W.-M. Gu, H.-J. Mu, J.-B. Fu, L.-L. Zheng, T. Yi, Z.-R. Bai, S. Wang, H.-T. Zhang, Y .-J. Lei, Y . Bai, et al., A method to search for black hole candidates with giant companions by lam- ost, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 872 (2) (2019) L20. 11

    2019

  5. [12]

    J. Liu, H. Zhang, A. W. Howard, Z. Bai, Y . Lu, R. Soria, S. Justham, X. Li, Z. Zheng, T. Wang, et al., A wide star–black- hole binary system from radial-velocity measurements, Nature 575 (7784) (2019) 618–621

    2019

  6. [13]

    S. Wang, X. Zhao, F. Feng, H. Ge, Y . Shao, Y . Cui, S. Gao, L. Zhang, P. Wang, X. Li, et al., A potential mass-gap black hole in a wide binary with a circular orbit, Nature Astronomy (2024) 1–9

    2024

  7. [14]

    S. J. Swihart, J. Strader, E. Aydi, L. Chomiuk, K. C. Dage, L. Shishkovsky, Discovery of a new redback millisecond pul- sar candidate: 4fgl j0940. 3–7610, The Astrophysical Journal 909 (2) (2021) 185

    2021

  8. [15]

    Yi, W.-M

    T. Yi, W.-M. Gu, Z.-X. Zhang, L.-L. Zheng, M. Sun, J. Wang, Z. Bai, P. Wang, J. Wu, Y . Bai, et al., A dynamically discov- ered and characterized non-accreting neutron star–m dwarf bi- nary candidate, Nature Astronomy 6 (10) (2022) 1203–1212

    2022

  9. [16]

    El-Badry, E

    K. El-Badry, E. Quataert, H.-W. Rix, D. R. Weisz, T. Kupfer, K. J. Shen, M. Xiang, Y . Yang, X. Liu, Lamost j0140355 + 392651: an evolved cataclysmic variable donor transitioning to become an extremely low-mass white dwarf, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505...

    2021

  10. [17]

    G. Li, S. Deheuvels, J. Ballot, F. Ligni `eres, Magnetic fields of 30 to 100 kG in the cores of red giant stars, Nature 610 (7930) (2022) 43–46. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05176-0

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Qi, W.-M

    S. Qi, W.-M. Gu, T. Yi, Z.-X. Zhang, S. Wang, J. Liu, Searching for compact object candidates from lamost time-domain survey of four k2 plates, The Astronomical Journal 165 (5) (2023) 187

    2023

  12. [19]

    Zheng, M

    L.-L. Zheng, M. Sun, W.-M. Gu, T. Yi, Z.-X. Zhang, P. Wang, J. Wang, J. Wu, S.-S. Weng, S. Wang, et al., The nearest neutron star candidate in a binary revealed by optical time-domain sur- veys, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66 (12) (2023) 129512

    2023

  13. [20]

    D. M. Rowan, T. Jayasinghe, M. A. Tucker, C. Y . Lam, T. A. Thompson, C. S. Kochanek, N. S. Abrams, B. J. Fulton, I. Ilyin, H. Isaacson, et al., A hidden population of massive white dwarfs: two spotted k + wd binaries, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 529 (1) ...

    2024

  14. [21]

    Jayasinghe, K

    T. Jayasinghe, K. Stanek, T. A. Thompson, C. Kochanek, D. Rowan, P. Vallely, K. Strassmeier, M. Weber, J. Hinkle, F. Hambsch, et al., A unicorn in monoceros: the 3 m⊙ dark companion to the bright, nearby red giant v723 mon is a non- interacting, mass-gap black hole candidate, ...

    2021

  15. [22]

    Jayasinghe, T

    T. Jayasinghe, T. A. Thompson, C. Kochanek, K. Stanek, D. Rowan, D. Martin, K. El-Badry, P. Vallely, J. Hinkle, D. Hu- ber, et al., The ‘giraffe’: discovery of a stripped red giant in an interacting binary with an 2 m⊙ lower giant, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soc...

    2022

  16. [23]

    El-Badry, R

    K. El-Badry, R. Seeburger, T. Jayasinghe, H.-W. Rix, S. Al- mada, C. Conroy, A. M. Price-Whelan, K. Burdge, Unicorns and giraffes in the binary zoo: stripped giants with subgiant com- panions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 512 (4) (2022) 5620–5641

    2022

  17. [24]

    M. E. Camisassa, L. G. Althaus, A. H. C ´orsico, F. C. De Ger ´onimo, M. M. M. Bertolami, M. L. Novarino, R. D. Rohrmann, F. C. Wachlin, E. Garc ´ıa-Berro, The evolution of ultra-massive white dwarfs, Astronomy & Astrophysics 625 (2019) A87

    2019

  18. [25]

    S. J. Kleinman, S. O. Kepler, D. Koester, I. Pelisoli, V . Pecanha, A. Nitta, J. E. d. S. Costa, J. Krzesinski, P. Dufour, F.-R. Lachapelle, et al., Sdss dr7 white dwarf catalog, The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement Series 204 (1) (2012) 5

    2012

  19. [26]

    Tremblay, J

    P.-E. Tremblay, J. Cummings, J. Kalirai, B. G ¨ansicke, N. Gentile-Fusillo, R. Raddi, The field white dwarf mass dis- tribution, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (2) (2016) 2100–2114

    2016

  20. [27]

    N. R. Lomb, Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data, Astrophysics and space science 39 (1976) 447–462

    1976

  21. [28]

    J. D. Scargle, Studies in astronomical time series analysis. I - Modeling random processes in the time domain, The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement 45 (1981) 1–71

    1981

  22. [29]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, D. W. Hogg, D. Foreman-Mackey, H.-W. Rix, The joker: A custom monte carlo sampler for binary-star and exoplanet radial velocity data, The Astrophysical Journal 837 (1) (2017) 20

    2017

  23. [30]

    X. Li, S. Wang, X. Zhao, Z. Bai, H. Yuan, H. Zhang, J. Liu, Binaries with possible compact components discovered from the lamost time-domain survey of four k2 plates, The Astrophysical Journal 938 (1) (2022) 78

    2022

  24. [31]

    Zhang, Y .-J

    B. Zhang, Y .-J. Jing, F. Yang, J.-C. Wan, X. Ji, J.-N. Fu, C. Liu, X.-B. Zhang, F. Luo, H. Tian, et al., The spectroscopic bina- ries from the lamost medium-resolution survey. i. searching for double-lined spectroscopic binaries with a convolutional neural network, The Astrop...

    2022

  25. [32]

    Liu, W.-M

    H.-B. Liu, W.-M. Gu, Z.-X. Zhang, T. Yi, J.-Z. Liu, M. Sun, A sample of compact object candidates in single-lined spectro- scopic binaries from lamost medium resolution survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09825 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    J. I. Vines, J. S. Jenkins, ARIADNE: Measuring accurate and precise stellar parameters through SED fitting, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Apr. 2022). arXiv:2204. 03769, doi:10.1093/mnras/stac956

    2022 doi

  27. [34]

    Brown, A

    A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J. De Bruijne, C. Babusiaux, C. Bailer-Jones, M. Biermann, D. W. Evans, L. Eyer, F. Jansen, et al., Gaia data release 2-summary of the contents and survey properties, Astronomy & astrophysics 616 (2018) A1

    2018

  28. [35]

    K. C. Chambers, E. Magnier, N. Metcalfe, H. Flewelling, M. Huber, C. Waters, L. Denneau, P. Draper, D. Farrow, D. Finkbeiner, et al., The pan-starrs1 surveys, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.05560 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  29. [36]

    G. R. Ricker, J. N. Winn, R. Vanderspek, D. W. Latham, G. ´A. Bakos, J. L. Bean, Z. K. Berta-Thompson, T. M. Brown, L. Buchhave, N. R. Butler, et al., Transiting exoplanet survey satellite, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 1 (1) (2015) 014003–014003

    2015

  30. [37]

    Skrutskie, R

    M. Skrutskie, R. Cutri, R. Stiening, M. Weinberg, S. Schnei- der, J. Carpenter, C. Beichman, R. Capps, T. Chester, J. Elias, et al., The two micron all sky survey (2mass), The Astronomical Journal 131 (2) (2006) 1163

    2006

  31. [38]

    E. L. Wright, P. R. Eisenhardt, A. K. Mainzer, M. E. Ressler, R. M. Cutri, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Padgett, R. S. McMillan, M. Skrutskie, et al., The wide-field infrared survey explorer (wise): mission description and initial on-orbit perfor- mance, The Astronomical ...

    2010

  32. [39]

    T. D. Morton, isochrones: Stellar model grid package, Astro- physics Source Code Library (2015) ascl–1503

    2015

  33. [40]

    Dotter, Mesa isochrones and stellar tracks (mist) 0: meth- ods for the construction of stellar isochrones, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 222 (1) (2016) 8

    A. Dotter, Mesa isochrones and stellar tracks (mist) 0: meth- ods for the construction of stellar isochrones, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 222 (1) (2016) 8

    2016

  34. [41]

    Vallenari, A

    A. Vallenari, A. G. Brown, T. Prusti, J. H. De Bruijne, F. Arenou, C. Babusiaux, M. Biermann, O. L. Creevey, C. Ducourant, D. W. Evans, et al., Gaia data release 3-summary of the content and survey properties, Astronomy & Astrophysics 674 (2023) A1

    2023

  35. [42]

    P. P. Eggleton, Approximations to the radii of roche lobes, As- trophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 268, May 1, 1983, p. 368, 369. 268 (1983) 368

    1983

  36. [43]

    B. J. Shappee, J. Prieto, D. Grupe, C. Kochanek, K. Stanek, G. De Rosa, S. Mathur, Y . Zu, B. Peterson, R. Pogge, et al., The man behind the curtain: X-rays drive the uv through nir 12 variability in the 2013 active galactic nucleus outburst in ngc 2617, The Astrophysical Jour...

    2014

  37. [44]

    Drake, S

    A. Drake, S. Djorgovski, A. Mahabal, E. Beshore, S. Larson, M. Graham, R. Williams, E. Christensen, M. Catelan, A. Boat- tini, et al., First results from the catalina real-time transient sur- vey, The Astrophysical Journal 696 (1) (2009) 870

    2009

  38. [45]

    A. Y . Kesseli, A. A. West, M. Veyette, B. Harrison, D. Feldman, J. J. Bochanski, An empirical template library of stellar spec- tra for a wide range of spectral classes, luminosity classes, and metallicities using sdss boss spectra, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series...

    2017

  39. [46]

    B. R. Roulston, P. J. Green, A. Y . Kesseli, Classifying single stars and spectroscopic binaries using optical stellar templates, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 249 (2) (2020) 34

    2020

  40. [47]

    Y . Suwa, T. Yoshida, M. Shibata, H. Umeda, K. Takahashi, On the minimum mass of neutron stars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) (2018) 3305–3312

    2018

  41. [48]

    Jayasinghe, K

    T. Jayasinghe, K. Stanek, C. Kochanek, B. Shappee, T. W. Holoien, T. A. Thompson, J. Prieto, S. Dong, M. Pawlak, O. Pe- jcha, et al., The asas-sn catalogue of variable stars–ii. uniform classification of 412 000 known variables, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ...

    2019

  42. [49]

    Mu, W.-M

    H.-J. Mu, W.-M. Gu, T. Yi, L.-L. Zheng, H. Sou, Z.-R. Bai, H.-T. Zhang, Y .-J. Lei, C.-M. Li, Compact object candidates with k/m- dwarf companions from lamost low-resolution survey, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 65 (2) (2022) 229711

    2022

  43. [50]

    Tucker, A

    M. Tucker, A. Wheeler, D. Rowan, M. Huber, Weighing the op- tions: The unseen companion in lamost j2354 is likely a massive white dwarf, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19004 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  44. [51]

    isolated

    J. Lin, C. Li, W. Wang, H. Xu, J. Jiang, D. Yang, S. Yaqup, A. Iskanda, S. Ma, H. Niu, et al., An x-ray-dim “isolated” neu- tron star in a binary?, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 944 (1) (2023) L4

    2023

  45. [52]

    S. J. Swihart, J. Strader, L. Chomiuk, E. Aydi, K. V . Sokolovsky, P. S. Ray, M. Kerr, A new flaring black widow candidate and demographics of black widow millisecond pulsars in the galactic field, The Astrophysical Journal 941 (2) (2022) 199

    2022

  46. [53]

    K. E. Conroy, A. Kochoska, D. Hey, H. Pablo, K. M. Hambleton, D. Jones, J. Giammarco, M. Abdul-Masih, A. Pr ˇsa, Physics of eclipsing binaries. v. general framework for solving the inverse problem, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 250 (2) (2020) 34

    2020

  47. [54]

    Hobbs, D

    G. Hobbs, D. Lorimer, A. Lyne, M. Kramer, A statistical study of 233 pulsar proper motions, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society 360 (3) (2005) 974–992

    2005

  48. [56]

    Bovy, galpy: A python library for galactic dynamics, The As- trophysical Journal Supplement Series 216 (2) (2015) 29

    J. Bovy, galpy: A python library for galactic dynamics, The As- trophysical Journal Supplement Series 216 (2) (2015) 29

    2015

  49. [57]

    H. Liu, C. Du, D. Ye, J. Zhang, M. Deng, Exploration of halo substructures in integrals-of-motion space with gaia data release 3, The Astrophysical Journal 976 (2) (2024) 161

    2024

  50. [58]

    Y . Yan, C. Du, S. Liu, H. Li, J. Shi, Y . Chen, J. Ma, Z. Wu, Chemical and kinematic properties of the galactic disk from the lamost and gaia sample stars, The Astrophysical Journal 880 (1) (2019) 36

    2019

  51. [59]

    H. Zhu, C. Du, Y . Yan, J. Shi, J. Ma, H. J. Newberg, Ele- ment abundance analysis of the metal-rich stellar halo and high- velocity thick disk in the galaxy, The Astrophysical Journal 915 (1) (2021) 9

    2021

  52. [60]

    J. Liao, C. Du, H. Li, J. Ma, J. Shi, Hypervelocity stars track back to the galactic center in gaia dr3, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 944 (2) (2023) L39. 13

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.